La Teoria Sintergia
La Teoria Sintergia
La Teoria Sintergia
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Mind and
Behavior
After the conclusion of this article in December of 1994, Dr. Jacobo Grinberg-Zylberbaum
disappeared without leaving trace. His family and coworkers continue to search for him. We
continue to follow his teachings, philosophy and the research he began. The author wishes to
thank Jenny Lewis for the help in translating this article, and also to Martha Luisa Pérez for
the transcription. The studies mentioned here were partly financed through CONACYT and
DGAPA. Requests for reprints should be sent to Dra. Leah B. Attie, Ahuehuetes Nte. 855,
Bosque de las Lomas, 11700, México, D. F. México.
This century has been witness to a struggle between two positions found in
the fields of neuro and psychophysiology: one can be called the elementarist
or localizationist position (see for example, Hubel and Wiesel, 1968; Konorski,
1967; Mountcastle, 1957) versus the Gestaltist or statistics position (for
example, John, 1972; Lashley, 1950; Lashley, Chow, and Semmens, 1951). I do
not have enough space to trace a complete history of the magnificent con-
frontation between these two positions yet I cannot resist the temptation of
presenting ideas on the subject. The elementarist position states that both
Experimental Evidence
Over the past two decades, studies in neurophysiology have shown that
interactions also take place between brains. I shall mention just a few of
these studies by way of evidence. In Mexico, Grinberg-Zylberbaum, Cueli,
and Szydio (1978) demonstrated that during human communication there is
a high correlation between the coherence of the brains of the participants in
Conclusion
The brain has solved the problem of the resistance put up by conductors by
using real biological superconductors: the sodium-potassium pump is an
active recovery mechanism where an action potential maintains the same
voltage all along the axon. The brain then has a hypercomplex network of
biological superconductors pressed together in a small volume and the infor-
mation that passes through that together with all the informational and
energy modifications that occur in the synapses and in the neuronal bodies,
the fluctuations of the membrane potentials as a result of ion flows etc., form
part of the structure of the neuronal field. The brain mimics the pre-space
organization because the stimulus that has interacted most constantly with
the brain structure since it appeared at the dawn of evolution has been, pre-
cisely, the pre-space structure. For this reason, it is tempting to think that the
brain has mimicked this structure in its neuronal wiring, and its result, the
activation of the neuronal field, would be the neuro-spatial mechanism that
is activated to transform this mimicry into fact. It is also possible that the
limit to brain capacity is related to the possibility that the human brain can
activate a neuronal field of the same syntergy as the pre-space structure.
Perhaps there we could perceive the high syntergic structure of pre-space,
and at that level our consciousness could reach unity. Be that as it may, the
distortion that the neuronal field exercises on the pre-space structure is per-
haps the mechanism that explains the relationships between brain, mind and
matter. The closer the neurosyntergy of the neuronal field to the syntergy of
pre-space, the greater will be these relationships. The new psychophysiology
of consciousness, called the syntergic theory, postulates the existence of the
neuronal field interacting with the fundamental pre-space structure. This
interaction creates a hypercomplex pre-space distortion that is the nearest
correlate of our conscious experience and is responsible for its unity.
References
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., and Roger, G. (1982). Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using
time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 45 ( 25), 1804-1807.
Attie, L.B. (1996). Actividad electroencefalográfico, y topografìa cerebral en relación a la interacción
humana: El potencial transferido. UNAM: México City.
Barlow, H.B. (1972). Single units and sensations: A neuron doctrine for perceptual physiology?
Perception, 1 , 371-394.
Bell, J.S. (1964). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics. 1 , 195-200.
Bell, J.S. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Review of Modem
Physics, 38(3), 447-452.
de Chardin, T. (1965). La activación de la energía. Madrid: Taurus.
Duane, T.D., and Behrendt, T. (1965). Extrasensory encephalographic induction between iden-
tical twins. Science, 150, 367.
Dunne, J.W. (1927). An experiment with time. London: Faber.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum mechanical description of real-
ity be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 171-180.
Goswami, A. (1989). The idealistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. Physics Essays, 2(4),
385-400.
Goswami, A. (1990). Consciousness in quantum physics and the mind-body problem, lhe
Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1 1 , 75-96.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1976). Retrieval of learned information. A neurophysiological con-
vergence-divergence theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 56, 95-110.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1982). Psychophysiological correlates of communication, gravitation
and unity. Psychoenergetics, 4, 227-256.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1987). La meditación autoalusiva. INPEC: Mexico City.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1987-1990). Los chamanes de Mexico, Volumes 1-7. INPEC: Mexico
City.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1988). Creation of experience. INPEC: Mexico City.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1994). La duración del presente. Revista Latina de Pensamiento y
Lenguaje, 1(2), 261-268.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Attie, L., Cerezo, R., Schettino, L., Pérez, M., and Meraz, P. (1995).
Electrofisiología de la interacción entre cerebros. Topografía del potencial transferido y la
teoría Sintérgica. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 2(1), 33-53.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Cueli, ]., Riefkhol, A., and Szydło, D. (1981), Correlativos electrofisi-
ológicos de la comunicación humana. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, VII( 2), 14.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Cueli, J., and Szydło, D. (1978). Comunicación terapeutica: Una
medida objetiva. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, IV( 1), 97.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Delaflor, M., Attie, L., and Goswami, A. (1994). The EPR paradox in
the brain: The transferred potential. Physics Essays, 7(4), 422-428.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Delaflor, M., Sánchez, M.E., Guevara, M.A. and Pérez, M. (1992).
Human communication and the electrophysiological activity of the brain. Subtle Energies,
3(3), 25-43.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Delaflor, M., and Sánches, A.M. (1989). El potencial transferido en el
cerebro humano. Revista Intercontinental de Psicología y Educación 2(1 and 2), 309-323.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., and John, E.R. (1981). Evoked potentials and concept in man.
Physiology and Behavior, 27 , 749-751.
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., and Ramos, J. (1987). Patterns of interhemispheric correlation during
human communication. International Journal of Neuroscience, 32(1-2), 41-45.
Harmony, T., Marosi, E., Becker, J., Bernal, J., Sanchez, L., Hinojosa, G., and Fernandez, T.
(1991). Estudio de la coherencia de la actividad electroencefalográfica en escolares con
diferente evaluación pedagógica. Memorias del XXXIV Congreso Nacional de Ciencias
Fisiológicas. Universidad de Colima, México.
Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional
architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 150, 106-154.
Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N. (1968). Receptive fields and functi
striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
John, E.R. (1972). Switchboard versus statistical theories of learn
850-864.
John, E.R. (1988). Resonating fields in the brain and the hy
Springer series in brain dynamics (pp. 368-377). Berlin: Springer V
Kaas, J.H. (1989). Changing concepts of visual cortex organi
Neuropsychology of visual perception (pp. 3-32). Hillsdale, New
Associates.
Köhler, W., and Held, R. (1949). The cortical correlate of pattern vision. Science, 1 10, 414-419.
Köhler, W., and O'Connell, D.N. (1957). Currents of the visual cortex in the cat. Journal of
Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 49, 1-43.
Konorski, J. (1967). Interactive activity of the brain. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Larson, V.A. (1987). An exploration of psychotherapeutic resonance. Psychotherapy, 24(3),
321-324.
Lashley, K.S. (1950). In search of the engram. Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology, 4,
454.
Lashley, K.S., Chow, K.L., and Semmens, J. (1951). An examination of the electrical field
theory of cerebral integration. Psychological Review, 56, 123-136.
Millay, J. (1981). Brainwave synchronization: A study of subtle forms of communication. The
Humanitic Psychology Institute Review, 3(1), 9-40.
Moruzzi, G., and Magoun, H.W. (1949). Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the
EEG. Electroencephabgraphic and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1 , 455-473.
Mountcastle, V.B. (1957). Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic
sensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 20, 408-434.
Müller, J. (1842). Elements of physiology. London: Taylor and Walton.
Orme-Johnson, D.W., Dillbeck, M., Wallace, R.K., and Landrith III, G.S. (1982), Intersubject
EEG coherence: Is consciousness a field? International Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 204-209.
Ouspensky, P.D. (1970). Tertium organum. New York: Vintage Books.
Pribram, K. (1991). Brain and perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwartz, E. L. (1985). On the mathematical structure of the retinotopic mapping of primate
striate cortex. Science, 227, 10-66.
Schwartz, E.L., Merker, E., Wolfson, E., and Shaw, A. (1988). Computational neuroscience.
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13, 13-23.
Spasskii, B.I., and Moskovkii, A.V. (1984). Nonlocality in quantum physics. Soviet Physics,
27(4), 273-283.
Targ, R., and Puthoff, H.E. (1974). Information transmission under conditions of sensory shield-
ing. Nature, 251 , 604-607.
Varela, E, Toro, A., John, E.R., and Schwartz, E.L. (1981). Perceptual framing and cortical
alpha rhythm. Neuropsychology, 1 9(5), 675-686.
von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press.
Wertheimer, M. (1912). Eperimentalle Studien uber das Sehen von Bewegung. Journal
Psychology, 61 , 161-265.
Wigner, E.P. (1962). In I.J. Good (Ed.), The scientist speculates (pp. 284-302). Kingswood: The
Windmill Press.
Wigner, E.P. (1967). Symmetries and reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.