CONFLICT OF LAWS - Readings
CONFLICT OF LAWS - Readings
CORE TEXTS:
Hill, J. and M. Ní Shúilleabháin Clarkson & Hill’s conflict of laws. (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2016) fifth edition
Torremans, P. et al. (eds) Cheshire, North & Fawcett: private international law.
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) 15th edition
Chapter 1 – introduction
Core text
Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 4 ‘Contractual obligations’, Section III ‘Determining
the applicable law’ and Section IV ‘The limits of the applicable law’: A
‘Introduction’ and B ‘Limits on freedom of choice’
Practitioner text
-Lord Collins of Mapesbury and J. Harris (eds) Dicey, Morris & Collins: the conflict of
laws. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2022) 16th edition [ISBN 9780414102040].
Dicey, Morris & Collins is excellent for reference purposes; there are regular
supplements to the two bulky volumes (the supplements are themselves
substantial, and have their own ISBNs).
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 1 ‘Introduction’, Section II ‘The conflicts process’,
B.3(A)(ii)(a) ‘The lex fori’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 1 ‘Introduction’, Section II ‘The conflicts process’,
B.3(D) ‘The incidental question’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 1 ‘Introduction’, Section II ‘The conflicts process’, B.3(C)
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 1 ‘Introduction’, Section II ‘The conflicts process’, B.1
‘Rationale of choice of law rules’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 1 ‘Introduction’, Section II ‘The conflicts process’,
B.3(F) ‘Exclusion of foreign law’.
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 1 ‘Introduction’, Section II ‘The conflicts process’,
C ‘Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments’
Essential reading
-Case: Ogden v Ogden [1908] P 46
-Gotlieb, A.E. ‘The incidental question revisited – theory and practice in the
conflict of laws’ (1977) 26 ICLQ 734 (available in HeinOnline and JSTOR via the
Online Libary)
-Briggs, pp.17–21 (available in VLeBooks via the Online Library).
-Briggs, A. ‘In praise and defence of renvoi’ (1998) 47 ICLQ 877 (available in
multiple Online Library databases)
-Carter, P. ‘The role of public policy in English conflicts of law’ (1993) 42 ICLQ 1
(available multiple Online Library databases).
-Fentiman, R. ‘Foreign law in English courts’ (1992) 108 LQR 142 (available in
Westlaw via the Online Library)
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 6 ‘Domicile, nationality and habitual residence’.
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 6 ‘Domicile, nationality and habitual residence’, Section V
‘Habitual residence’
Essential reading
-Cases: Winans v AG [1904]; Ramsay v Liverpool Royal Infirmary [1930] ; IRC v Bullock
[1976]; Re Furse [1980]
Chapter 4 – jurisdiction
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 3 ‘Foreign judgments’, Section I ‘Introduction’
-Cheshire, North and Fawcett, pp.496–518 (available on the VLE)
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 2 ‘Civil jurisdiction’, Section II ‘Bases of jurisdiction in personam’
Essential reading
-Hartley, Chapter 3 ‘Jurisdiction under EU law’; Chapter 4 ‘EU law: special
jurisdiction’, Chapter 8 ‘Choice-of-court agreements’, Sections 1 ‘Introduction’
and 2 ‘The European Union’; Chapter 10 ‘Jurisdictional conflicts: the EU
approach’; and Chapter 14 ‘EU law’ (available in Cambridge Core via the Online
Library).
-Garvey, S. and K. Birch ‘Brussels Regulation (recast): an update’ (Allen & Overy
LLP, 2015) http://bit.ly/1PgnSIB
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 2 ‘Civil jurisdiction’, Section III ‘Declining jurisdiction
and staying proceedings’, B.1 ‘The development of the doctrine’, 2 ‘General
principles’ and 3 ‘The effect of a dispute-resolution clause’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 2 ‘Civil jurisdiction’, Section III ‘Declining jurisdiction
and staying proceedings’, B.5 ‘The Brussels I Regulation and non-Member States’,
Section IV ‘Provisional measures’ and Section V ‘Restraining foreign proceedings:
anti-suit injunctions’.
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 3 ‘Foreign judgments’, Section I ‘Introduction’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 3 ‘Foreign judgments’, Section II ‘Recognition and
enforcement at common law’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 3 ‘Foreign judgments’, Section IV ‘Recognition and
enforcement under the Brussels I Regulation’
Essential reading
-Hartley, Chapter 14 ‘EU law’ (available in Cambridge Core via the Online Library).
Chapter 8 - contracts
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 4 ‘Contractual obligations’.
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 4 ‘Contractual obligations’, Section VI ‘Particular
aspects of the contract’.
Essential reading
-Garcimartín Alférez, F.J. ‘The Rome I Regulation: Much ado about nothing?’
(2008) 2 The European Legal Forum (E), 61–80 (available on the VLE).
Chapter 9 - torts
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 5 ‘Non-contractual obligations’.
Chapter 11 - property
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 9 ‘Property’, Section I ‘Movables and immovables
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 9 ‘Property’, Section II ‘Transfers inter vivos’, B
‘Tangible movables’
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 2 ‘Civil jurisdiction’, Section III ‘Declining jurisdiction
and staying proceedings’, B.4 ‘Cases involving immovable property not
regulated by the Brussels I Regulation’.
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 9 ‘Property’, Section III ‘Matrimonial property’
Core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 9 ‘Property’, Section IV ‘Succession’.
-Cheshire, North and Fawcett, pp.1382–96 (available on the VLE)
Chapter 13 - Marriage and other adult relationships and the status of children
core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 7 ‘Marriage’.
Essential reading
-Hartley, T. ‘The policy basis of the English conflict of laws of marriage’ (1972) 35
MLR 571 (available in HeinOnline and JSTOR via the Online Library).
-Cheshire, North and Fawcett pp.724–31.
-There are differing views on Radwan. Read I. Karsten [1973] 36 MLR 291 for the view that
it is wrong; A. Jaffey [1978] 41 MLR 38 defends the decision.
-You may find Onobrauche v Onobrauche [1978] 8 Fam Law 107, Poon v Tan [1973] 4 Fam
Law 161 and Quoraishi v Quoraishi [1985] FLR 780 useful. They are discussed in Clarkson and
Hill, p.404
Chapter 14 – matrimonial causes
core text
-Clarkson and Hill, Chapter 8 ‘Matrimonial causes’
Essential reading -The rigidity of Article 11(2): read Truex [2001] Fam Law 233 and Mostyn
[2001] Fam Law 359