ELECTROCHEMISTRY Lab Report
ELECTROCHEMISTRY Lab Report
ELECTROCHEMISTRY Lab Report
Diaz
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
I. Introduction
Materials:
III. Methodology
Gathering of Materials
The surface of the Cu and Pb strips was cleaned with sandpaper. Following
cleaning, a half-filled beaker with 0.5 M Cu(NO3)2 was prepared, and the Cu strip was
immediately placed on the beaker. A second beaker half-filled with 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 was
also prepared, and a Pb strip was placed on it.
A funnel was used to fill the U-tube with 0.5 M KCl. A cotton plug was inserted at
both ends of the u-tube after it had been filled. It was also ensured that there was no
empty space on the u-tube. After that, the U-tube was inverted and its ends were placed
on the two beakers. The half-cells and salt bridge were configured as shown in Figure 1.
To connect the wire that leads to the metal strips, alligator clips were used. The
wire leads were connected directly to the voltmeter terminals. After that, the voltage was
measured and recorded in table 1. The wire-leads were then detached from the metal
strips after the voltage was measured.
Sandpaper was used to clean the surface of the Pb and Al strips. Following the
cleaning, a half-filled beaker with 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 was prepared, and the Pb strip was
immediately placed on the beaker. A second beaker half-filled with 0.5 M Al2(SO4)3 was
also prepared, and an Al strip was placed on it. A new salt bridge was also made between
the Pb half-cell and the Al half-cell. Following that, the voltage generated was instantly
measured. The half-cells and salt bridge were configured as shown in Figure 1.
Calculating the % Difference
The formula Ecell = Ered – Eox and table of standard electrode potentials was used
to calculate the theoretical value of the voltage for each electrochemical cell observed in
this experiment. The formula:
⃒ 𝑉𝑒𝑥𝑝 − 𝑉𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 ⃒
% difference = x 100
𝑉𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐
was used to calculate the percent difference between the voltage obtained from the
experiments and the theoretical value of voltage was recorded in table 2.
Results
Voltage (V)
Voltage (V)
Discussion
The objective of this experiment was to determine the voltage produced by various
electrochemical cells and to understand how galvanic cells work. The results show that
the voltage produced from the Pb half-cell and the Cu half-cell is 0.49, with a percent
difference of 4.3 percent, indicating that the calculated voltage and experimental voltage
have a little discrepancy. The voltage obtained from the Pb half-cell and the Al half-cell,
on the other hand, is 0.31, with a percent difference of 79.7 percent, indicating that the
value obtained is so far from the theoretical value of the voltage. This huge percent
difference could be due to experimental errors that caused the observed voltage to be
lower than the theoretical value of the said half-cell. Furthermore, the concentration
dependency of cell voltages is not included in the experiment, as Tanis (1990) did in his
publication "Galvanic cells and the standard reduction potential table." Tanis (1990) also
stressed the importance of electrode polarity in obtaining voltage data. He claimed that
the sign of the electrode reveals the direction of the half reaction at the electrode. When
the meter reading is positive, the half reaction occurring at the electrode attached to the
negative meter connector is supplying electrons. This shows that oxidation is occurring
at that electrode.
V. Summary ,Conclusion and Recommendation
VI. References
Tanis, David O. (1990). Galvanic cells and the standard reduction potential table. Journal
of Chemical Education, 67(7), 602–. doi:10.1021/ed067p602
VII. Appendices
Documentation
Ecell = 0.47 V
⃒ 0.49 − 0.47 ⃒
% difference = x 100
0.47
% difference = 4.3%
Ecell = 1.53 V
⃒ 0.31 − 1.53 ⃒
% difference = x 100
1.53
% difference = 79.7%