Woodson Property Group's Conditional Use Permit Application

Conditional Use Application
Hubbard County Environmental Services

301 Court Ave., Park Rapids, MN 56470
Phone: 218.732.3890 Fax: 218.732.7993
vwvw.co.hubbard.mn.us/environmenta|.htm
This form must be legibly completed in INK.

Appiicaiii iiameisiiWoodson Property Group LLC Daiei 6/26/23
Owner name(s) (if different from applicant):
iiiiaiiiiigaddiessi 304 Lake Street NW, Warroad, MN 56763
E911 property Address; 24519 Fairwood Lane, Nevis Minnesota 56467
j:__::_
phone: 2187911108 Aii_ phone; 7206336256 Emaii: [email protected]
Tax Parcel Number(s): 2140-02700 ‘tr Zl ."-l?.<7“l“l'2.Cl
4/43. E595 0'8 0W 65-3
iegai desciipiioiii 1.66 AC NST HIGHLANDPARK w1/2 OF LOT 5 & ALL.OF LOTS 6-14 BLK 4
Sect: 0_9_
Twp: 14°”
Rng: 33_W_
Lake/river name: Belle Tame
Explain your requested conditional use: Give details of the type, size, purpose and any
other relevant information
regarding your proposed use. Be thorough. Attach additional sheets labeled “ConditionalUse Request”,
if necessary.
This application is for the request to re-build and open the old "Anchor Inn", to be called
"The Anchor".
There is an existing foundation, existing electrical service and some plumbing. The building
will be 1
story above grade at the road two stories facing the lake. Approximate foundation
dimension is ~24‘ x
56' and will have a ~16 ‘x 56' deck facing the lake. A separate septic system will
be installed to support
up to 90 persons and 6 employees (plan attached). This restaurant and bar would be
operated year
round. Hours willvary based on day of week and seasons based on usage and to preserve
the
tranquility of the lake. Parking would be in front of the restaurant, across F'airwood Lane on
our other
property and a 10-13 slip dock would also be available for watercraft.
Signature of applicant(s):
For Office Use

Date of application:
updated 01/01/2022
Page 8 of 785
Conditional Use Application
HUBBARD
CQUN-Ty
._ _ _.
"
Hubbard County Environmental Services
301 Court Ave., Park Rapids, MN 56470
Phone: 218.732.3890 Fax: 218.732.7993
vmIw.co.hubbard.mn.us/environmental.htm
Conditional Use Application Procedure

1. In order for Hubbard County to comply with Minnesota Statute 15.99 (processing time deadlines for agency action), a pre-
application meeting must be held between the applicant and Environmental Services staff to determine which of the
following additional information items must be provided:
A topographic survey showing (2 foot / 10 foot) contour intervals.

Location and size of all wetlands.
I Subsurface sewage treatment system (site evaluation /design.)
An approved MPCA Stormwater Permit if project disturbs over 1 acre.
A grading and erosion control plan with itemized 3-D dimensions (in ft.) and volumes (in cu. yds.)
for all proposed topographic alterations.
Other:
The pre-application meeting was held on M33’ 13 , 20_2_3.Itwas agreed by the applicant(s) and Environmental Services staff that
the items checked above are required for this conditional use application to be complete.
D“ II db R
‘
w d d
Signature of app|icant(s):
Ryan Woodward D32?2%Z€'5$.29’15Y§§o2?84?5ST
D,,,,,,
Ryan Woodward 8. Brad Woodward were present
Signature of Env. Services staff: Bryan Haugen & Eric Buitenwerf were present Date:
2. Submit your complete application to the Environmental Services Department along with the application fee.
3. lfthe Environmental Services Department determines that the application is complete, it will be placed on the next available
Planning Commission meeting agenda.
4. The Planning Commission (PC) and Environmental Services Director will visit the property on which the proposed use is to
be located. It is highly recommended that you be present at the site visit to explain your proposed use to the PC. You will be
noti?ed of the site visit date and time.
5. The PC will consider your application during a regularly scheduled meeting. it is highly recommended that you be present at
the meeting to explain your application and answer any questions the PC has concerning your application. You will receive
notice of the meeting date, time, and location. The PC may recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of your
application. The PC may also table your application.
6. Once the PC acts on your application, it is then placed on the next available County Board meeting agenda. You will receive
notice of the meeting date, time, and location. The County Board has final authority to approve, approve with conditions,
table, or deny your application.
7. lfthe County Board approves your application, you must then obtain a $100.00 conditional use operating permit before you
can legally start your approved conditional use. The County Board may place conditions on your application’s approval that
must be satis?ed before your operating permit can be issued. Also, be aware the Shoreland Management Ordinance
contains a two year sunset clause that states the allowed conditional use must commence within two years of the County
Board approval date or the conditional use permit is automatically deemed null and void.
8. Once your operating permit is issued, you may start and operate your conditional use as approved.
9. Your conditional use permit can only be modi?ed by applying for and receiving approval of an amendment.
updated 01/01/2022
Page 9 of 785
"’°5
NORYH T
pnac£L :.\ ‘~10-0"“”°

I T-'1 53: \7E_ L
‘375
«iv 7
2‘ 0
j‘ )Lo?E
R
3%
$ ;-
‘.35 W-
__
uew Danni FIE“)

(_
3: Q4’
‘K
5 '“1;;g;;;2f,.L.';,;* “*1 ,
r:-em 30
pan!
H0 ‘mm w/1-4' 924.5
H :\o-\\ 11 as up 15‘
A. _-.__.__.,.___4 -,
1‘
9 - -x.
mam; 3» 40.31100 “FL
am:1. we -
——+
‘WW5
-5 an-«P
g_.a"°“$e
L 113»-\5v...'zs
‘\0' ‘F I}
rue Aumoa
V55 LR:-u:NL~r.
ID \\
A
3 °‘
11'
"
Va 7
'1 S f,_AK"E (BELL; T5971’; _
>
1 Z 3
( ?H >
HAIEK W!€*~I.&|C1
“I 118 mm
10-13 (Boar .3 vun'E£ LEVEL?
QEM.
Page 10 of 785
Parcel 21.40.02700 lmgermeable Surface
1.66 Acres = 72,310 SQ FT
ALLOWABLE(25%) = 18,078 sq FT
ToTAL = 17,798 so FT
—
Restaurant (includes deck and stairs)
0 3,350 sq ft
—
Cabin 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
o 520 sq feet each (foundation is smaller)
0 4,160 sq feet
—
Cabin 3
o 780 sq feet (foundation is smaller)
—
Pump House
0 64 sq ft
—
Seating
o 1,048 sq ft
—
Gravel lot
0 3,000 sq ft
—
Paved Driveway
0 3,500 sq ft
—
Restaurant Parking
0 1,296 sq ft
-
Sidewalks/Stairs
o 600 sq ft
Page 11 of 785
Page 12 of 785
Page 13 of 785
Page 14 of 785
Page 15 of 785
Page 16 of 785
Page 17 of 785
Page 18 of 785
Page 19 of 785
Page 20 of 785
Page 21 of 785
Page 22 of 785
Page 23 of 785
Page 24 of 785
Page 25 of 785
Page 26 of 785
Page 27 of 785
Page 28 of 785
Page 29 of 785
Page 30 of 785
Page 31 of 785
4
1 1
3
1
||||||\
1
Page 32 of 785
Page 33 of 785
Page 34 of 785
Page 35 of 785
Page 36 of 785
Hubbard County Trench/Pressure Bed with Pump Design
Property Owner: Woodson Property Date: June 21, 2023
Mailing Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone Number: 218-791-1108 (Brad)
Site Address; 24519 Fairwood Ln
City: Nevis State: Mn Zip: 56467
Driving directions if no address issued:
Legal Description: 1 .66ac/ 1.54ac

Sec: 9 Twp: 140 Range: 33 Twp Name: Nevis
Parcel NUmb€T121.40.02700/ 21 .40.04920
Lake/ River: Belle Tame Lake/River Classi?cation: General Development El
Flow Data L__EstimatedFlow in Gallons er Da (GPD)
Bedrooms
Number of Bedrooms:
Dwelling Classi?cation: I E]
Other GPD
System Type: I E] Amount:
GPD: 2,229 2229
Wells
Deep Well: Exisiting Deep I3
Shallow Well: None [3
Wells to be sealed (if applicable)?
Setbacks
Tankgsl to: Well 50+ Drain?eld to: Well 100+ Sewer Line to well: 50+
House 17 House 100+ Air Test: No
Property Line 10+ Property Line 14
Additional System Notes and Information:

Restaurant septic 90 seats / 6 employees
Smeals / seat I day X 8 = 24gpd
24 gpd X 90 seats = 2160gpd
6 employees 11.5gpd = 69gpd
total ?ow 2229gpd
septic tanks 6687 gals (3-2250 septic tanks)
lift tank 2250gal
Designer Name: Don Umthun License Number: 1867
Address: P.O.Box 391
City: Nevis State: Mn Zip: 56467

Phone Number: 218-252-6411
E-Mail Address: donumthun@hotmai|.com
Page 37 of 785
Property Owner: Woodson Property Date: June 21, 2023 Designer's Initials: du
Tank Sizing
A. Septic Tank Capacity: 6750 Gallons
.
3 '3 .’.6o§6_Q
Tank Type: 1 Compartment Filter: No Se tic Tank
Bedrooms Minimum
:
gg?acjty GD/BL
Garbage Disposal/Basement Lift Station: No Disposal or Lift
B. Pump Tank Capacity: 2250 Gallons (7080.2l0O)

4 °' “SS "°°° l "500
{'
«
5 or 6 1,500 2,250
a. Alarm Type: Electric B 8 Org 2,000 3,000
Soils
C. Depth to Restricting Layer: 7 ft
Native SSF: 0.83 (Perc. Rate [Optional]: MP1)
Rock Trenches Trench width;

3.0 ft
*Choosc which systein size you will use by clicking the button to the lefI*
B06 in. Trench Depth: v-mi Sq- ft Cubic Yards of Rock: 68.5 yds‘
F.@ 12 in, Trench Depth: um. sq. ft Cubic Yards of Rock: 82.2 yds-‘
(}.O 18 in. Trench Depth: um sq. ft Cubic Yards of Rock: 90.4 yds’
H.024 in. Trench Depth: U100 sq_ ? Cubic Yards of Rock: 102.3 yds‘
I. Lincal Feet: 494.0
Chamber Trenches Dimensions of one chamber (L x W): 4.00 ft X 3.00 ft

J. Brand: Q-4 Chambers
K.O6-l l in. Chamber Depth: 1.550.: sq. ft
L. Q12 in. Chamber Depth: 1,480.1 sq. ft
M. Lineal Feet: 494.0
0. Total Chambers Needed: 124.0 Chambers
Pressure Bed
P. Pressure Bed: 1,350.1 sq. ft
i. Bed Dimensions: ft >< ft —-—-—-0 Rock Depth: ft
ii. Cubic Yards of Rock: yds3
Additional System Notes and Information:

500|in ft of drain ?eld
12in of rock under pipe or 124 Q-4 Hi Cap Chambers
Page 38 of 785
Hubbard County Trench/PressureBed with Pump Design
Property Owner: Woodson Property Date: June 21, 2023 Designer‘s Initials: du
Tablel
Determine Pump Capacity
Perforation Discharge (GPM/perf.)
1) Gravity Distribution Pump Capacity Range: 10 45 GPM -
Ft. of 7/32 Perf 1/4 Perf
*Skip to Pump Head Requirements if pumping to gravity Head Diameter Diameter

1.0 0.56 in. 0.74 in.
2) Pressure Distribution: 1.04 in.
2.0 0.80 in.
21)Number of laterals:
b) Lateral Size: 1.5 in. Table2

e) Perforation spacing: ft Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe
F r F
F1ow(GPM) 1.5” 2" J 3"

d) Check Table 4 to see the maximum number of perforations per lateral. I
20 2.47 0.7 0.1 1

3) Lateral Length (choose): 25 3.73 1.11 0.16
Rock Bed Length: fl
_ 30 5.23 _E.550.23 T.
21)End manifold: -2 ft 35 6.96 2.06 0.30

-1 r
b) Center manifold: -1 ft 40
‘L
8.91
F1640.39
45 _ 11.07 _ 3.28 0.48
e) Choose 33 or 3b: ft
50 13.46 3.99 0.58
F
4) Total Perforation Determination: 55 4.76 0.70
a) Perforations/ Lateral F
60
65
,1 ,_
.5.60:1
6.48
0.82
0.95
b) Total Number of Perforations 70 11441.09
e) Select perforation discharge from Table 1: GPM/Perf. Use 1.0 for single homes, 2.0 for everything else
10.0 GPM
(1) GPM/Perf. :
Table 3
PUMP HEAD REQUIREMENTS
Volume of Liquid in Pipe
5) Elevation difference: Gal/Ft.
FPipe
Diameter
a) Elevation difference between pump and point of discharge 40.0 ft 1.25 in. 0.078
1.5 in. 0.1 1
b) If pumping to a pressure distribution system: 45.0 it
2.0 in. 0.17
C) Choose @521if pumping to gravity or 0 5b for pressure: 40.0 ft
E
6) Friction loss: Table 4
a) Select a value from Table 2: 0.73 ft per 100 ft of pipe Max PerforationslLateral
Perf. 1.25" 1.5” 2”
b) Pipe length to drain?eldz 370 ft X 1.25 = 462-5 ft
Spacing Pipe Pipe Pipe
e) 3.4 Friction Loss V2.5
ft. 14 18 28
3 ft. 13 17 26
7) Drainback:
3.3 ft. 12 16 25 I
8) Total Head
a) Actual Pipe length
Required: 43-4
370 ft X .11 gal/ft (Table 3)= 40.7 gal 4 it.
5 Ft.
I1
10
15
14 +22 23
9) Minimum Pump Sizcao-0GPM & 43.4 ft. of dynamic head

Pump Model:Z0e11eI'161
Page 39 of 785
Property Owner: Woodson Property Date; June 21, 2023 Designer’s Initials: du
Proposed SiteBoring #1
|
‘
Depth (in) Texture Coarse Frag. % Color Structure Redox

041
#
sandy loam 0% 10yr 3/2 weak
7 no
4-12
12-60
?
a
4
" "
med sand
#
T
<35%
"
+ 10yr 5/4
10yr 6/4
1
"
s. grain
"
__ "
"
60-84 med sand "
JL 10yr 6/3 s. grain "
Proposed site Boring #2

r Redox
Depth (in)
0-6
Texture
sandy loam
Coarse Frag. .%
0%
?
I Color
10yr 3/1
Structure
weak
Y
F
no
‘
"
6-12 " "
<35% 10yr 5/3 " "
10yr 6/4 7 s. grain “

12-68 med sand "
A p
68-84 med sand " l 10yr 6/3 s. grain "
L
4L—
Alternate Site Borin #1 _

Depth (in) Texture Coarse Frag. % Color Structure Redox
T
* ¥
O-4 sandy loam 0% 10yr 3/2 weak no

4-10 " "
‘
<35% 10yr 5/4 1 " " “
4 +
"
10-64 med sand "
10yr 6/3 s. grain
J ___T
64-84 med sand "
10yr 7/4 s.grain "
L Ah _i
Alternate Site Boring!/2

Depth (in) Texture Coarse Frag. 96 Color Structure Redox
. t
k
5. .
#-
J?
Soil Sizing Factors/Hydraulic Loading Rates

“
Perc. Rate Texture SSF __ HLR I Perc. Rate.‘ Texture SSF HLR
<0.1 Coarse Sand 16 to 30 4 Loam 1.67
0.1 to 5 Sand 0.83 1.20 31 to 45 J Silt Loam 2.00 0.50
0.1 to 5 Fine Sand 1.67 0.60 46 to 60 Clay Loam 2.20 0.45
**"*
6 to 15 Sandy Loam 1.27 0.78 > 60 Clay Loam 0.24
Description of Soil Treatment Areas

Proposed Site Alternate Site
Disturbed Areas? no no
compacted Areas? no no
Flooding Potential? no no
r
Run-on Potential? ll
no no
Limiting Layer Depth Proposed #1:7ft Proposed #2:‘/ft Alternate #1:7ft | Alternate #2:
_
Slope % and Direction 2% South 2% South
4
Landscape Position lsidehill side hill

Vegetation Types dry dry
Soil Texture med sand med sand
Soil Sizing Factor .83 .83
Page 40 of 785
Property Owner: woodson property Date: June 21' 2323
Please show all that apply (Existing or Proposed):

Wells within lO0 ft. of a Drain?eld Disturbed/Compacted Areas Access Route for Tank Maintenance
Water lines within 10 ft. ofa Drain?eld Component Location Property Lines
Drain?eld Areas OHW Structures
Boring Locations Lot Easements Setbaeks
Elevations:
Benchmark Elevation: Pump Elevation:
F.levati0n of Sewer Line at House: Pump Discharge Elevation:
Tank Inlet Elevation: Restricting Layer Elevation:
Drain?eld Elevation:
Designer Signature: 9134K’ Date: License Number: 1867
C lick the "Submit Fonn" button to the left to submit the design sheet and an new e-mail
Submit message will open with the completed design sheet attached. Please attach the site drawing
and any other necessary paperwork to this e-mail before submitting.
C
A’
Reset Farm. Click the “Reset Form" button to the left to clear any infomiation you entered into the fonn.
Page 41 of 785
Su rfce w Tr mn mMn mnP|n
Property
Property Owner:W00dS0n Phone:218-791-1108 Date. 6/21/2023
Mailing Address: City:__________,_ Zip:
Site Address. 24519FairwoodLn City:NeViS

M" Zip: 56470
This management plan will identify the operation and maintenance activities necessary to ensure long-term
performance of your septic system. Some of these activities must be performed by you, the homeowner. Other tasks
must be performed by a licensed septic service provider.
SlfstemDesigner? Check eVe"Y_:___—__m°”th5- My System needs to be checked

Local Government: check every months. 12 1st tank
every—j'jm°nths'
State Requirement: check every 36 months.
Homeowner ManagementTasks
Leaks -Check (look, listen) for leaks in toilets and dripping faucets. Repair leaks promptly.
Surfacing sewage Regularly check for wet or spongy soil around your soil treatment area.
-
Ef?uentfi/ter—— Inspectandclean twice a year ormore.

A/arms —A|arm signals when there isa problem. Contact a service provider anytime an alarm signals.
Event counter or water meter Record your water use.
-
-recommend meter readings be conducted (choose one: DailyoMonthlyoYearlyo
Professional Management Tasks

Check to make sure tank is not leaking
Check and clean the in-tank effluent ?lter
Check the sludge/scum layer levels in all septictanks
Recommend iftank should be pumped
Check inlet and outlet baffles
Check the drain?eld effluent levels in the rock layer
Check the pump and alarm system functions
€ Check wiring for corrosion and function
E Check dissolved oxygen and effluent temperature in tank
6? Provide homeowner with list of results and any action to be taken
6. Flush and clean laterals ifcleanouts exist
"I understand it is my responsibility to properly operate and maintain the sewage treatment system on this property, utilizing the
Management Plan. If requirements in the Management Plan are not met, lwill promptly notify the permitting authority and take
necessary corrective actions. Ifl have a new system, lagree to adequately protect the reserve area for future use as a soil treatment
system."
Property Owner Name: W°°d5°“ P"°Pe”Y 6/21/2023
Designer Signature: W 6/21/2023
See Reverse Side for Home Owner Management Log
Page 42 of 785
Home Own r Maintenance Lo
I Activity Date Accomplished

_QheckfrequentIy:
Leaks: check for plumbing leaks
Soil treatment area check for surfacing
I
Lint?lter: check, clean if needed
Ef?uentscreen: ifowner-maintained
Water usage rate (monitor frequency
Check annually:
=
—
Caps: inspect, replace if needed j—
_
Sludge & Scum/Pump
Inlet & Outlet baffles —
——
Drainfield ef?ue_ntleaks
Pump, alarm, wiring
Flush & clean laterals if cleanouts exists
Other:
= Z
7
Other: i
>_ W i
1
5F 3 9'75 Tami: $7» I u

Notes: *
-to-04*» r ( 4 ’"@Q r\ I ‘II let!
Mitigation/corrective action plan:
P \PZSHARE\Fom\s\SSTS Management Plan.docx
Page 43 of 785
II‘ ‘Ta MINNESOTA POLLUTION
Compliance Inspection report form
' ' '
t CONWOL AGENCY
520 Lafayette Road Nam, Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS)
St‘ Pam’MN551554194 Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement
Instructions: Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and system owner within 15 days of
final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Instructions for ?lling out this form are located on the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) website at https;/lwvvw.pca.state.mn.us/sitesldefault/?les/wq-wwists4—31aspdt.
Propertv information Local trackin number:

Parcel ID# or SeclTwplRange: _2_'l.4_Q_./0g27_00 Reason for Inspection SALE _ _
Local regulatory authority info: HUBBARD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL

Property address: 24519lj‘__AlRV\l_OODLN_7NE_\/7|S_ _
Owner/representative: RIC_K_& KAY WOOLRICH Owner's phone: 218-265-0762 ___
Brief system description: 1700 GPD SYSTEM SERVICE THE ENTIRE EESORT,
P P
15oo,1ooo,1ooo/500 SEPTIC TANKS, 1500 LIFT

TANK WITH DUAL PUMPS, PUMPING TO A 500 GAL STILLINGTANKTHEN GRAVITY TO 7-100' SB2
TRENCHES
System status
System status on date (mm/ddlyyyy): 9/1/2021
IE Compliant —
Certificate of compliance‘ |:] Noncompliant —
Notice of noncompliance
(Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or
imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.
abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision Bis discovered or _ .
Ari imminent threat to publichealth safety(l_TPHS) must be and
t
3 shone, time frame exists in Loca, Ordinance.)

upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt
A
w°te" c°"'P"a”c° i"di‘at°5 °°"f°”"a"°° Wm’ M"’”- of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or
R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not unde, section 145A_ 04 Subdivision 8,
guarantee future performance.
Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable)
___
:1 Impact on public health (Compliance
-'
component #1) imminent threat to public health and safety
Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) Failing to protect groundwater
—
—
Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) Imminent threat to public health and safety
—
Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) Failing to protect groundwater —
:| System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 70802500 (Compliance component #3) Failing to protect groundwater —
C] Soil separation (Compliance component #5) Failing to protect groundwater

—
I: Operating permitlmonitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) Noncompliant local ordinance applies — -
Comments or recommendations
SOFTENER DATA SHOWS DAILY AVERAGE OF 382 GPD
Certification
I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of
future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system,
inadequate maintenance, or future water usage.
By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be true ct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be
used for the purpose of processing this form.
Business name: NORTHLAND INC
SEPTICMAINTENANCE 6
Certification number:‘_32Q6
Inspector signature: License number:§4§
(Thisrdocument
7
_ 7 7
has been electro ally signed) Phone: 218-947-4999

Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached)
XISoil observation logs El SystemlAs—Bui|t El Locally required forms Tank Integrity Assessment [:1 Operating Permit
Other information (list):
https://www.pca.state.mn.us - 651-296-6300 0 800-557-3864 - Use your preferred relay service 0 Available in alternative formats
wq-wwists4—31b - 4/28/2021 Page 1 of 4
Page 44 of 785
Property Address: 24519 FAIRWOOD LN NEVIS
INC
T
7
Business Name: SEPTIC

NORT_HLAND MAINTENANCE oatéz 9/1/2021)
1. Impact on publichealth —
Compliance component #1 of 5
c°mP§§LW ,,_: _, , _ _ :
Attached 5“PP°"ti"9 d°°“me"tati°"3
System discharges sewage to the D Yes‘ IZINo [I Other:
ground surface
[I Not applicable
System discharges sewage to drain El Yes‘ No
tileor surfacewaters.
System causes sewage backup into Cl Yes’ E No
dwellingor establishment. I
Any "yes” answer above indicates the system is an
imminentthreatjg gublic healthand safety.
Describe verification methods and results:
WALK TANK AND DRAINFIELD AREA
2. Tank integrity —
Compliance component #2 of 5
Compliance) griteia; _g
Attached supporting documentation:
System consists of a seepage pit, D Yes’ ElNo T
E] Empty tank(s) viewed by inspector
cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, '
or ptherupit? _ __ _ _
Name of maintenance business: NQ_RTljl_LAND
i
g_ , , , g g_
Sewage tank(s) leak below their ll] Yes‘ IE No License number of maintenance business: 519
designed operating depth? l Date of maintenance: 9/1/2021
l
i
l 3 Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach)
Date of maintenance
|fyes’VwDjgf1§§V?g§£a%(§1l§§Lsi;rV _ 7
(mm/dd/YYYY)I (must be within
three years)
Any “yes” answer above indicates the system (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with
is failing to protect groundwater. Min") R 70530700 SUbP- 4 B (1))
:1 Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary —

explain below)
C] Other:
PUMP AND INSPECT TANKS THROUGH MANHOLES, SOME ROOT INTRUSION ON TANKS 1 & 2
https://www.pca.state.mn.us - 651~296-6300 - 800657-3854 0 Use your preferred relay service - Available in alternative formats
wq-wwists4~31b 0
4/28/2021 Page 2 of 4
j
Page 45 of 785
Property Address: 24519 FA|RjWOOD__LN
NEVIS
rljatei 9/1/2021
1
Business Name: NORTHVLAND

g
sepnc MAINTENANQEJNC _>
Z
S
W W
3. Other compliance conditions Compliancecomponent #3 of 5 —
3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured?
:] Yes‘ No I] Unknown
3b. Other issues {electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? [I Yes‘ No 1: Unknown
*Yes to 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety.
3c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? I] Yes‘ IE No
3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? El Yes‘ 8 No
*Yes to 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater.
Attached supporting documentation: I: Not applicable E
4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* Compliance component —

#4 of 5 IX!Not applicable
is the system operated under an Operating Permit? E Yes I] No If “yes”, A below is required
_
Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP speci?ed in the system design? Yes 3 No If “yes”, B below is required
BMP = Best Management Practice(s) speci?ed in the system design
If the answer to both questions is “no”, this section does not need to be completed.
Compliance criteria:
a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? [:1 Yes El No
b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? I] Yes [:1 No
Any “no” answer indicates noncompliance.
Attached supporting documentation: I] Operating permit (Attach)
https://www.pca.state.mn.us 0 651-296-6300 0 800-657-3864 0 Use your preferred relay service - Available in alternative formats
wq—wwists4-31b 0
4/28/2021 Page 3 of4
Page 46 of 785
Property Address: 24519 FAlRWOOD_l_NNEVIS
9/1_r2o21
7 A
Business Name: _NQR_THLAlQS_EPTLC

_l\llA|NTENP_tlj{(_,‘.E
INC," Date: ,
5. Soilseparation —
Compliancecomponent #5 of 5
Date of installation 5/18/1995 [I Unknown
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Shorelandlwellhead protectionlFood E Yes [:1 No Attached supporting documentation:

beverage lodging?
2] Soil observation logs completed for the report
gqmp?ange cri_t§ria (select q_n§); _
:1 Two previous veri?cations of required vertical separation
5a.For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and l E] Yes I] No’ :1 Not applicable (N0 50" treatment area)
not located in Shoreland or Wellhead
Protection Area or not serving a food, D
beverage or lodging establishment:
Drain?eld has at least a two-foot vertical
separation distance from periodically
saturatedsoil or bedrock.
5b.Non-performance systems built W Yes No" Indicatedgepths or_eLeyati_qns V
__
April 1, 1996, or later or for non- _ _ _ , ;

performance systems located in Shoreland ~ A;_'5iQ11°!T!.9f9l$_"'b,U_I'?lmedia _
12
or Wellhead Protection Areas
or serving
food, beverage, or lodging establishment:
a B. periodica?saturated
1
” ’ ‘“
"
soil/bedpgk
’ ’
C.__S.yst.em 39
’
§gr2ara.ti2r1
Drain?eld has a three-foot vertical ,
_ ,
separation distance from periodically D._l3equired_gomplIanceseparatton* ; 36
‘
saturated soil or bedrock.‘

ll ‘May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local
'
T
Ordinance.
5c. "Experimental", “Other", or “Performance” _] Yes No‘
systems built under pre-2008 Rules;
Type IV or V systems built under 2008
Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080. 2400
L
(Intermediate Inspector License required 5
2, 500 gallons per day; Advanced Inspector
License required > 2,500 gallons per day)
Drain?eld meets the designed vertical
separation distance from periodically ,
saturatedsoilgribedrock. _
1
*Any “no” answer above indicates the system is
failing to protect groundwater.
SB
0-4 SL 10YR3/1
4-9 SL 1OYR4/4
9-17 MS 10YR4/6
17-38 MS 10YR5/4
38-51 FS 1OYR5/4
STOP
Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced,
or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the
system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by
local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as de?ned in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the
system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict.
This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food,
beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law.
https://www.pca.state.mn.us 0 651296-6300 - 800-657-3864 0 Use your preferred relay service 0 Available in alternative formats
wq—wwi5ts4»31b - 4/23/2021 Page 4 of 4
Page 47 of 785
/hunnara
uo. mte nvaluauon 1*orm.x1s Page 1 OI 1
IL
Borin Elevation: Location:
Soil Hori;ons
Depth
Texture
T5
iorin 1Elevation:
Soil HorizonsDepth
inches
’ 3
https://dm2—exce1.of?ceaDns.Iive.com/x/ lavouts/xlnrintview.nsnx‘?&NnAn?1==lA’rm=qainnTrl 1 /92/on-1;:
Page 48 of 785
Page 49 of 785
Transfer Entered On 11[9(2021 A0°°420534
( X )eCRV ( )N/A HUBBARD COUNTY, MINNESOTA
( X)No DelinquentTaxes
( )Current Taxes Paid In Full
( )N/A
(X )N/A
CERTIFIEE6
Fn'EDbA"D/OR
RE RDED N
11/9/2021 2:49:05 p"
Lauren Anderson, HubbardCounty Recorder ANDERSON
|_Au|u5u
HUBBARD courrrv RECORDER
BY DLH Deputy
Parce| No_ 21.4-0.02700 BY Dep PAGES: 3
21_40_04920 WELL DISCL RECD L
—
MTG REG TAX PD $ 0.00

DEED TAX PD $ 2392.50
TAX EXEMPT
DOCUMENT RECORDED ELECTRONICALLY
(Top3 Inchesreservedfor recordingdata)

A I I
WARRANTY
DEED MinnesotaUniformConveyance Blanks
Business Entityto Business Entity Form10.1.9(2013)
eCRVnumber: ____ __
DEEDTAXDUE:S 2392.50 DATE: October15.

2021
(month/day/year)
FORVALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, Resort Content.
LLC
(insert name 0! Granioij
a LimitedLiability Company underthe lawsof Minnesota ("Grantor").

herebyconveysand warrantsto WoodsonPropertyGroup.LI,§_ _p
__ _W
_____ I
Y
(insertnameofGrantee)
0
A
a LimitedLiabilityCompany underthe lawsof Minnesota ("Grantee"),

realpropertyin Hubbard County,Minnesota,legallydescribedas follows
SEE ATTACHED
EXHIBIT
'A"
Checkhere ifail or panof the describedrealpropertyis Registered(Torrens) [:1
thereto.subject to the lien of all unpaidspecial assessments and interestthereon and

together withallhereditamentsand appurtenancesbelonging
the following
additionalexceptions:
Page 1 of 3
Page 50 of 785
Pge 2 0!3 MinnesuaUnilorrnConv?ndggBianksForm10.1.9
Checkapplicablebox: Grantor
E] The Sellercertifiesthat the Seller does not knowof any wellson
the describedrealproperty. ResortContent,LLC
[8 A well disclosurecerti?cateaccompanies this documentor has ‘"3"’ °’ 9"""°"
? , Q2[5}
eiearonicarilniea.
tifalectronicallyitied,
_
been insertWDC
By. ,
number: ‘) (signature
‘VALE
[I I am familiarwiththe propertydescribedin thisinstrumentand I

certifythat the status and numberofwellson the describedreal "51
propertyhave not changed since the iast previousiy?ledwell “W”°"’"'"°"'Y’
_‘
disclosurecerti?cate.
By: x
(signature)
its: Member
{typeolauthorityi
Stateof Minnesota.
Countyof __ Hubbard
wasacknowledged
Thisinstrument beforeme on QC/'W€r..j.[«
\‘5. 2g}!
(month/daylyear)
.by RickyL.Wooldridge
(name ofauthorized
signer)
as W__
Member
(type ofauthority)
and by Catherine M.Wooldridge __

(name of authorizedsigner)
as _____of Reso Content.LLC

(typeofauthority)
ANNE
M.MCCARTHY
. . __ __ Notary Pubiic-Minnesota “"9 (°"‘ Ra“")"
My CommissionE:pIms.Ia.n 31. 2022
33?’;/‘.‘» Mycommissionexpires: l ..3 __ Q3
(month/tlaylyea?
THISINSTRUMENT
WASDRAFTED
BY: TAXSTATEMENTSFOR THEREALPROPERTYDESCRIBED
iNTHIS
(insert nameand address) INSTRUMENT
SHOULD
BESENTTO:
or businessaddressofGrantee)
(insertlegal name and residential
HubbardCountyAbstract3. Closing, Inc. Woodson PropertyGroup. LLC
416West ThirdStreet . -
305‘1-’:H‘5‘$77’ ( "°. )
-
- - -
Park Rapids.MN56470
FileNumber:21-8448
KB L4K} C)bjv 3
Page 51 of 785
Page3 oi 3 MinnesohUniform BlanksForm 10.1.9
Conveyancing
EXHIBIT
"A"
The West Halfof LotFive (5) and all of Lots Six (6). Seven (7), Eight (8), Nine (9), Ten (10),Eleven (11),Twelve (12),Thirteen(13)and
Fourteen (14)of BlockFour (4)of Highland Park.according to the plat thereof on ?le and of record in the office of the County Recorder in
and for the Countyof Hubbardand the State of Minnesota.AND
That part of Block"N"of Highland Park, described as follows: Beginningat a point on the southerly boundary line of said Block"N"
which point is 370 feet west of the Southeast corner of said Block "N";thence going in a Northerlydirectionon a line parallelto the
Easterlyboundaryline of said Block"N"320feet; thence going in a Westerly direction on a line parallelto the southerly boundary line of
said Block"N"210feet; thence going in a Southeriydirection on a line parallelto the Easterly boundary line of said Block "N"320feet to
the Southerlyboundary line of Block"N".said point being 210feet West of the pointof beginning;thence going in an Easterly direction
along the southerly boundary line of said Block"N"to the point of beginning.
HUBBARD COUNTY,MINNESOTA
ABSTRACT PROPERTY
PropertyAddress (for reference purposes only) - 24519FairwoodLn, Nevis,MN56467
Page 52 of 785
6126/23.11:15 AM Hubbard County Court Administrationto 24519 Fairwood Lane, Nevis, MN- Google Maps
GoogleMap S Hubbard County Court Administration,301 Court Drive13.0 miles, 18 min

Ave, Park Rapids, MN 56470 to 24519 Fairwood Ln,Nevis, MN 56467
Map data @2023 1 mi Ijjl
Hubbard County Court Administration
.
301 Court Ave, Park Rapids, MN 56470
1 1. Head north on Court Ave toward 2nd St W

0.1 mi
r-) 2. Turn right onto MN-34 E/1st St W
Continue to follow MN-34 E
Pass by Dairy Queen Grill& Chill(on the left in 0.8
mi)
11.6 mi
I‘ 3. Slight left onto Bunyan Trails Rd
0.2 mi
4-‘ 4. Turn left onto Co Hwy 18/County 18
4-‘
r)
.
5. Turn left onto Fairwood Dr
6. Turn right onto Fairwood Ln

Destination willbe on the left
0.8 mi
0.2 mi
463 ft
24519 Fairwood Ln
Nevis, MN 56467
https:IIwww.google.comlmapsIdirlHubbard+County+Court+Administration,+301
+Court+Ave,+Park+Rapids,+MN+56470/24519+Fairwood+Lane,+Nevi... 1/1
Page 53 of 785
4
Page 54 of 785
‘
-
21.o9.0os2o
i
“W600 i . .
@013
0 v
V
' '
,«
0
V
»
0
21,40.04s10 21.04300 ;- 21.09.00-100
s »
H ~ "
_- 21.09.010.11
0
21.09.1041 , ~,_
21.090-1010
2.0003730
“rs .
210902900 « 21.09.2310
4
21.
37
000‘ .
s02
21.09.03 2913
-V.
i
007
1.0903030 V y ' .1.“_t 1' 50
37’ 3
° 00
250
EXSCLAJMER:Information availabb on or accessed from Hubbard County’s GIS mans is provided for °‘
hformatbnal and reference purposes oniy and has not been prepared for and may not be suitable for
legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Hubbard County makes no guarantee as to the accuracy,
currency, suitabiity,performance, merchantability, re|iabi|ity,orfitness ofthis data and information forany -23 P
particular purpose. Hubbard County shall not be iable for any incidental or consequential damages,
losses, or third party claims that might arise from the use of maps or the informatbn theycontah, even if
Hubbard County has been advised ofthe possibility of such potential loss or damage. This data may not be
usediniurisdictionsthatdonotallow the exclusion orlimitation ofincidental or consequentialdamages. _
Hubbard County 301 Court Ave’ Pa rk Rapids, MN 56470
Page 55 of 785
PARCEL ID TAXPAYER NAME 1 TAXPAYER NAME 2 TAXPAYERADDRESS 1 TAX

21.80.011OO ALAN R & MARY C SELF 829 LAKESUSAN HILLS DR PAY
CH
ER
AN
21.51.03300 ALLAND 8: CYNTHIAL LUNDSTROM 11068 SPRUCEWOOD LN N CH
HA
AM
21.51.03400 ALLAND LUNDSTROM ETAL 11068 SPRUCEWOODLN N CH
SSE
PLI
AM
21.09.03700 ANDREW & MELISSALINDOW 24454 FAIRWOOD LN N
NE
N
PLI
VIS
21.S1.0110O ANNE E BARTOLONI JOHN M BARTOLONI 4790 REGENTSWALK EX
N
21.40.05000 ANNETTE RHODES NICK RHODES 24569 COUNTY18 CEL
NE
SIO
VIS
21.40.03330 BILLG 84JAN S LEE 3816 FAIRVIERDR GR
R
21.51.0360O CASA DE LAGO TRUST MARK L LINDBLOM TTE ETAL 3230 BITTERSWEETLN AN
SAI
D
NT
21.40.0332O CHARLES& PATRICIA BLAIRTRUST 24661 COUNTY 18 PO BOX 81 NE
21.51.00500 CHARLESD & PATRICE A HATCH 926 105TH AVE NW VIS
CO
21.40.03300 CINDY LALIM 24631 COUNTY 18 ON
NE
21.51.00600 DANA M CIRKS JENNIFERACIRKS 3822 41ST AVE S VIS
MO
21.47.00200 DANIEL B JOHANNECK PAMELAJ JOHANNECK 62820 250TH ST OR
LIT
HE
CH
21.51.04200 DANIELJ 8: RITA M EVESLAGETR DANIELJ & RITA M EVESLAGETTE 34976 317TH ST ME
AD
FIE
LR
21.40.04800 DANIELJ NORMAN PO BOX 924 SIS
LD
OSE
SET
21.51.03000 DARRENJ OSTENDORF 22851 QUAY ST NW ST F
ON
21.80.00400 DAVE M BORGESON NORMA C BORGESON 1022 WEST PORT PKWY WE
21.40.04930 DEREKS WATSON KAYLYNS NAEVE 24496 FAIRWOOD LANE ST
NE
21.09.02031 DNR-PARKSAND RECREATION ITASCASTATE PARK ACCTS PYBLE 36750 MAIN PARK DR VIS
PAR
21.40.03400 DONALD L & MAXINE M ANDERSON 20516 FAIRWOOD DR K
NE
21.51.04100 DONALD THULLLE THULLCABIN LLC 999 DOUGLASRD VIS
SAI
21.80.00800 DOUGLAS & VICKIJO HAWKINSON 20574 FABULOUS VIEW DR NT
NE
21.40.0510O DOUGLASJEWISON CARMEN JEWISON 20507 FAIRWOOD DR VIS
NE
21.80.01000 DUANE S BORGESON 8: SUSAN C BORGESON DEBRAS BORGESON 1419 61ST AVE VIS
FAR
21.51.00300 DWIGHT D DEBOER GENEVIEVEDEBOER PO BOX 306 GO
LAF
21.51.0120O EUGENEA & MARY M MOE TR 20338 FAIRWOOD DR AY
NE
ETT
VIS
21.47.0060O EUGENE L & MIRIAM R KARSTENS 1501 W 7TH AVE N CLE
E
21.51.01800 FRANCESE MASTRIAN 20248 FAIRWOOD DR AR
NE
21.40.03000 GARY M MACK BARBARAR MACK 2552 S DAISY VIS
ME
21.51.0130O GREGORY M 8: PATRICIA L SHARP 9212 TELFORDXING SA
BR
21.40.032OO HAROLD & JINX STANWICK PO BOX 302 OO
NE
KLY
VIS
21.51.03500 HERMAN LTATLEY 20249 FAIRWOOD DR NE
N
21.80.002OO ILENEODEGARD 5354 26TH ST S APT 303 VIS
FAR
21.47.01300 J & M 1 LLC PO BOX 253 GO
NE
21.09.0210O J & M 3 LLC PO BOX 253 VIS
NE
21.47.0110O JOHN P PARKSETAL 18841 EAGLEWING DR VIS
PAR
21.47.00500 JOSEPH D LARSON NICOLER LARSON 1822 7TH ST S K
FAR
21.47.00700 JOSEPH FAURE JENNIFERFAURE 167 2ND ST NW # 301 GO
VAL
21.09.04100 JOSEPH PROVENZA JEANETTE PROVENZA 24277 COUNTY 18 LEY
NE
21.80.00600 KATHLEENS NARLOCK CHARLESJ NARLOCK 5801 PINEHURST CT VIS
GR
AN
D
Page 56 of 785
21.09.02820 LARRY& PRISCILLAJ PARKS 18841 EAGLEWING DR PA

21.47.003OO LINDA KAYANDERSON 15769 DOWNSTREAM DR RK
PAR
21.40.03700 LON & JULIANNE VOIGT TR MICHAEL& CANDICEVOIGT TR 583 HALSEYAVE SW K
BU
21.09.03710 MARGARETA LINDOW 1902 24TH AVE S FFA
MO
LO
OR
21.51.04400 MARGO BERNARDY 20401 FAIRWOOD DR NE
HE
VIS
21.40.02900 MARK WESTLUND 8007 JUNE AVE N BR
AD
21.51.01900 MELANIE HUMBURG TR MELANIE& JOEL D HUMBURG TTE 13551 400TH AVE OO
BL
KL
UE
21.40.05200 MICHAEL& CANDICE VOIGT TR LON & JULIANNEVOIGT TR 27862 HIDDENCOVE RD CO
YN
21.80.007OO MICHAELS 84.PAMELA A MISIALEK 10946 57TH AVE N LD
GL
21.47.00800 MITCHELLW BLOMS & P L STANLEY 3213 CHERRYLN N YN
FAR
DO
GO
21.80.00300 MYRON M & DAWN H HUMMEL 1611 6TH ST E WE
N
21.51.03100 NATHAN H MEDHUS KERRIR HEIN-MEDHUS 3301 S RIVERDR ST
FA
21.40.04940 NEVISTRAILBLAZERS PO BOX 395 RG
NE
O
VIS
21.40,04810 NICHOLAS& ALICIAPODOLL 24509 FALCON RD NE
21.47.00900 NICHOLASD 84KRISTENM RICHTER 24321 FAIRWOOD LN VIS
NE
21.09.03800 NORTHWAY TRANSPORTATION CD KENNETHG & MARY G SPURLIN PO BOX 238 VIS
NE
21.5 1.01410 OMAR A BARRIENTOS KRISTIM BARRIENTOS 3905 BRICKMANAVE VIS
AM
21.40.00012 OUR LADYOF THE PINES CATHOLICCHURCH PO BOX 378 NE
21.51.01600 P & K VANDER VORST TR P & K VANDER VORST '|'I'E 240 PRAIRIEWOOD DR S VIS
FA
21.09.02810 PATRICIA A SIMONEAU KENNETH R SIMONEAU 15144 W VERMILLIONCIR NE RG
HA
O
M
21.40.04900 PATRICK & IONE EISCHENSCD RUSSELL] LAVAN 20545 FAIRWOOD DR NE
21.S1.00400 PAUL B 8: MARGARET M WAGNER 17100 CREEKRIDGETRL VIS
MI
21.80.0010O RANDALJ & ANGELA R GREEN 20 DESIREEDR NN
GR
ET
AN
21.09.02830 REBECKAL DECENT DARLDECENT 16135 210TH ST S BA
ON
D
RN
21.51.037OO RICHARD& JODY PRIBYL 20279 FAIRWOOD DR KA
NE
ES
VIS
21.51.009OO RICHARDA BIPES TRUST RICHARDA & LAURAL BIPES 'ITE 2564 133RD LN NE HA
VIL
21.51.03900 RODNEY D & SARAHUNTER 10210 OAKGREENAVE N M
LE
STI
21.S1.01700 ROGER 8: IRISSCOTT 2040 SE WADDELLWAY LL
WA
WA
UK
21.09.024OO RONALDG SKARE 2050 DELAWAREAVE APT 325 WE
TER
EE
ST
21.09.00400 SAMUEL A VANCLEAVE ERICAL VANCLEAVE 385 WEST AVE NE
21.47.01000 SANDYSTAFFORD-SENST 18278 GRANDVIEWAVE VIS
LA
21.80.0120O SHADYSHORES HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 26164 INDIGO DR M
PA
21.09.0011O SHAWN P DUDLEY 106 LAKEWOODDR RK
BE
21.51.0430O STEPHANIEJ CARLSONTR 58361 GRANTST MI
PA
DJI
RK
21.80.00900 STEPHEN CARNAL RUTH CARNAL 926 PARK DR S FA
21.80.00500 STEPHEN.I OLLANKETO CHRISTA L OLLANKETO 1918 128TH AVE NW RG
CO
O
ON
21.47.01200 STEVENM & KATHRYNL HANSON 58594 222ND ST LIT
21.51.02000 THOMAS & DEBORAHMAY 17932 75TH AVE N CH
OSS
FIE
EO
21.09.02500 THOMAS BORRESCH 9 17TH AVE SE SAI
LD
21.51.0450O THOMAS W DR KEMPF TR MARY K KEMPF TR 15 PRAIRIEWOOD DR S NT
FA
21.51.03200 TIMOTHYJ TAUER BARB J TAUER 20215 FAIRWOOD DR RG
NE
O
VIS
Page 57 of 785
21.40.03S00 TRACYA & SCOTT D DONABAUER CD ROBERT 8: JOYCE STEWART 572 CENTRALAVE 5 RIC
2l.51.0380O W H GILBERTSON& M J ADELMANN 5910 HAWTHORNE HM
MO
ON
UN
21.51.0070O WALTER S JOHNSON RENEE M JOHNSON 4590 MAGNOLIALANEN PLY
D
D
MO
21.51.01000 WANDA A BECKHAM 105 S 33RD ST W
UT
21.40.0270O WOODSON PROPERTY GROUP LLC 304 LAKEST NW WA
H
RRO
AD
Staff Report
Hubbard County Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment
Monday, August 28, 2023 Hearing/Meeting
PLANNING COMMISSION:
NEW BUSINESS
Conditional Use Application 1-CU-23 by Woodson Property Group, LLC: The W 1/2 of Lot 5 and all of Lots
6-14, Block 4, Highland Park, Nevis Township on Lake Belle Taine, a recreational development lake. Parcels
21.40.02700 and 21.40.04920. Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit per Section 401, Table 1 of the
Shoreland Management Ordinance to operate a restaurant use.
Enclosed Document(s):
 1-CU-23 application
 2020 aerial imagery w/2’ elevation contours overlain
 07/27/2023 staff site visit photos and sketches
 05/19/2023 dwelling unit density calculation
 08/28/2013 Fairwood Lane ROW certificate of survey
The request is to operate a restaurant use on this property. A nonconforming resort use consisting of seven
cabins currently operates on the property. This resort use is two units over the allowed dwelling unit density. The
proposal is to construct a new restaurant building on top of an existing slab and foundation (from a former
structure that used to be on the property) located in the NW corner of parcel 21.40.02700 and build a 16’ x 56’
lakeside deck on the structure’s lakeside exterior wall. A maximum customer occupancy of 90 and a six person
employee complement is proposed. Proposed parking areas are located immediately north of the proposed
structure and across the township road to the north on parcel 21.40.04920. A dock system consisting of 12-13
slips is also proposed as a means of facilitating customer traffic traveling to the site by the lake. A new SSTS
design for the restaurant is included in the application. The tanks would be located south of the structure and the
drainfield would be located just north of the existing drainfield on parcel 21.40.04920 located on the north side
of Fairwood Lane (which bisects the property) that services the resort cabins.
Fairwood Lane is a Nevis Township road. The right-of-way (ROW) is 66’ wide and was created when the plat in
which these parcels are located was approved and recorded in 1913. The structure setback from this ROW is
20’. The Shoreland Management Ordinance (SMO) does not require a ROW setback from a rear lot line for the
parking area proposed to be located on the north side of the restaurant. However, the SMO does require a 20’
ROW setback for the parking area proposed to be located on parcel 21.40.04920 on the north side of Fairwood
Lane.
With the two proposed parking areas, there are some safety-related items to mention. Regarding the parking
area on the north side of the restaurant, the distance between the restaurant and ROW boundary is tight for
fitting vehicles in the proposed north-south orientation and not having vehicles extend into the ROW. Using the
enclosed certificate of survey that Nevis Township had prepared for the ROW in 2013, staff measured the
distance between the ROW boundary and north wall of the proposed restaurant as being ~19’ deep on the east
side and 22’ deep on the west side. The distances between the north wall of the restaurant and south edge of
the road’s gravel surface are ~34’ on the east side and 36’ on the west side. As proposed, vehicles parking in
this area would need to either back onto the Township road when exiting or stop on the road and then back into
a parking space. Regarding the proposed parking area on the north side of the road on parcel 21.40.04920, the
safety issue is that of how the customers would then get to and from the restaurant which will involve walking
along the edge of the road and then crossing it.
The proposed parking space dimensions are 9’ x 18’. The County Highway Engineer said the standard
recommended parking space dimensions are 10’ x 20’ and that even a 10’ width gets narrow as the Government
Center parking lot is striped at 10’ x 19’ dimensions. Also, relative to determining the number of parking spaces
needed, the following are some standards that are used by other entities: 1. one parking space per 6 customer
seats, one parking space per 1-2 employees, and one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of restaurant customer
Page 58 of 785
Staff Report
seating area. With customers being able to access the restaurant by both land and water, it is a bit more
challenging to know what percentage of customers will use which means of access. It is reasonable to assume
that access by the lake will occur during the summer months and that any outdoor customer dining area will not
occur when the weather is not favorable. So then it is advisable to determine what the maximum indoor
occupancy will be and what an appropriate number of vehicle parking spaces ought to be to support that
occupancy. It is also advisable to determine the number of vehicle parking spaces needed to support the total
indoor and outdoor customer occupancy as there will be spring and fall windows in the year where outdoor
seating is still usable, but the proposed dock system may not be in the lake. If insufficient parking area exists,
the potential for customers to park vehicles along either side of the Township road increases.
As to the proposal for customers to reach the restaurant by the lake, there is a large island ~450’ south of the
property that is ~1740’ long which requires boaters to either go around the west side of the island or under the
bridge to the island in order to reach the property. The lake is on average 500’ wide between the mainland and
the island. Both the mainland and island have high density substandard width residential riparian lots along them.
So wakes and boat traffic-related sound levels and aesthetics are items to consider. Accessing the property from
the east side of the island is a more direct route from the main body of the lake passing underneath the bridge
on Fairwood Drive that connects the island to the mainland. A new box culvert bridge to the island is being
installed this year. The underside of the top span of the culvert will be at a 1434’ elevation above mean sea level
per the County Engineer. The OHW of Belletaine is 1428.3’ above mean sea level. The culvert will be 14’ wide.
The SSTS servicing the seven cabins is located on parcel 21.40.04920 and is compliant. The proposed new
SSTS to service the restaurant would have its tanks located lakeward of the restaurant and its drainfield
immediately to the north of the resort drainfield. The design does not show where alternate drainfield sites for
the two systems might exist, but there is room further north on the lot that appears undisturbed and the
topography is suitable. The resort cabin drainfield is SB 2 gravelless pipe. If/when this system ever needs to be
replaced, the drainfield area will be required to increase threefold as gravelless pipe is no longer allowed to be
used as it isn’t a State-registered drainfield media. When it was able to be installed, the State allowed one linear
foot of 10” diameter pipe to count as having three square feet of treatment area. The State now recommends
that one linear foot of 10” dia. pipe count as one square foot of treatment area. In any motion to recommend
approval of the CUP application, staff recommends that a condition be made requiring the restaurant SSTS to
be installed and receive a passing compliance inspection before the CUP operating permit can be issued.
As to the proposed use’s compatibility with surrounding property uses, Fairwood Lane is a dead-end road that
runs ~2200’ west of the subject property. There are 21 riparian seasonal and year-round residential lots and five
non-riparian lots on the road to the west of the property. The use of these lots would generate the vehicle traffic
that will pass by the proposed restaurant. The restaurant would be ~1450’ from County 18 which is the nearest
paved highway. The intersection of Fairwood Drive and County 18 is ~1630’ west of the City of Nevis. There are
roughly 36 residential lots on the island that sits opposite the subject property to the south. Aside from the resort
on the property, the neighborhood is residential in use. Traffic (vehicle and watercraft) and sound levels that
accompany a restaurant use are the primary considerations of note relative to neighborhood compatibility. Given
the restaurant’s proximity to the road and the parking area proposed between it and the road, screening of some
kind from the roadside isn’t possible, but there appears to be room for screening along the west boundary line
and between the parking area on parcel 21.40.04920 and the road ROW so these would be items to consider
as possible conditions to address any noise/aesthetic issues that are identified during the lot viewal and meeting.
The application includes an impervious surface area calculation prepared by the applicants that shows the
property will have 24.75% impervious surface area with the proposed restaurant factored in. Staff hope to have
time to field truth this information prior to the meeting.
As the application proposes a lakeside deck on the restaurant, but does not state if outdoor customer space is
proposed on the deck or elsewhere, staff recommends asking the applicants to explain how the outdoor space
is planned to be used such as for customer dining area and whether any outdoor music or other activities that
Page 59 of 785
Staff Report
might generate higher sound volumes are planned as a restaurant’s outdoor sound levels have proven to be a
neighborhood compatibility concern for other restaurants located in residential lakeshore neighborhoods.
Concerning the resort use, two SMO violations were identified during the course of staff working on this project.
First, there is a barrel style sauna that was placed on a platform that doesn’t meet the 100’ OHW setback or
have the required variance from this setback or land use permit. Staff communicated to the applicants during the
conditional use permit pre-application meeting that this sauna was non-compliant and how it can be brought into
compliance. The second item is that during a July 27, 2023 site visit, staff encountered people who said they
were renting and staying in the structure labeled # 9 on the application site plan sketches that was used as an
office by the prior resort owner and is not allowed to be used as a rental unity without a variance to expand the
nonconforming use. The Department is still investigating and researching this issue. A letter to the applicant
concerning this matter will likely be sent in the near future. It is recommended that a condition be placed on any
potential motion to recommend approval of the CUP application that these and any other violations must be
resolved before the CUP operating permit can be issued.
Below is a list of proposed conditions and items worth considering addressing through possible conditions:
1. This conditional use permit (CUP) is for the operation of the entire premises as one restaurant use venture.
As such, any land, that through subdivision or addition to the property to which the CUP is granted, is added
or subtracted, is/are not granted or allowed the right to operate in accordance with the CUP without first
applying for and obtaining the necessary CUP from the County.
2. Allowed business days/hours/months of operation
3. Allowed outdoor use – customer seating, music, activities like horseshoe pits, corn hole, etc.
4. Location, number, and size of customer patron dock(s), dock(s) dimensions, and # of watercraft slips –and
specifying that customer watercraft can only moor on the allowed dock(s) and not beach on the shoreline
5. Maximum customer occupancy both inside and outside of the restaurant
6. Specified number of, location, and dimensions of customer parking areas and number and dimensions of
vehicle parking spaces – and type of surfacing material (e.g. gravel, asphalt) – also consider a condition
prohibiting customer vehicle parking in the Fairwood Lane ROW
7. Outside lighting – so any lighting isn’t detrimental to neighboring property owners
8. Outside sound levels – generally best regulated by setting quiet hours
9. SSTS – restaurant SSTS must be installed before the CUP operating permit can be issued
10. Signage - #, size, location, digital/non-digital sign face, color, and lighting
11. Exterior color of the restaurant and deck – in case bright, bold colors are proposed that might not be in
harmony with the surrounding residential neighborhood
12. Any ordinance violations on the property must be fully resolved before the CUP operating permit can be
issued
13. Outside temporary structures such as tents – allow them and if so, specify number, size, location, and
duration
Below are the findings of fact questions for your consideration:
1. Is the requested use consistent with public health, safety, and welfare?
YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
2. Is the requested use consistent with the goal of preventing and controlling water pollution, including
sedimentation and nutrient loading? YES ( ) NO ( )
Page 60 of 785
Staff Report
Why or why not?
3. Will the requested use not adversely affect the site’s existing topography, drainage features, and
vegetative cover? YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
4. Is the requested use’s site location reasonable in relation to any floodplain and/or floodway of rivers or
tributaries? YES ( X ) NO ( )
Why or why not? There are no FEMA designated floodplains in Hubbard County.
5. Has the erosion potential of the site based upon the degree and direction of slope, soil type, and existing
vegetative cover been adequately addressed for the requested use? YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
6. Is the site in harmony with existing and proposed access roads?

YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
7. Is the requested use compatible with adjacent land uses?

YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
8. Does the requested use have a reasonable need to be in a shoreland location?

YES ( X ) NO ( )
Why or why not? A restaurant use is allowed as a conditional use on all public waters classification except
for special protection in the Shoreland Ordinance jurisdictional area.
9. Is the amount of liquid waste to be generated reasonable and the proposed sewage disposal system
adequate to accommodate such? YES ( X ) NO ( )
Why or why not? A SSTS design for a new septic system sized to service the proposed restaurant was
included in the application that shows there is room and a location with suitable soils in which the needed
drainfield can be installed.
10. Will the visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters comply with Section 901
of the Ordinance? YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
11. Is the site adequate for water supply and on-site sewage treatment systems?
YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
Page 61 of 785
Staff Report
12. Are the affected public waters suited to and able to safely accommodate the types, uses, and numbers
of watercraft that the use will generate?
YES ( ) NO ( )
Why or why not?
Page 62 of 785
Conditional Use Application 1-CU-23 by Woodson Property Group, LLC:
2020 Aerial Imagery with Elevation Contours Overlain
Page 63 of 785
Conditional Use Application 1-CU-23 by Woodson Property Group, LLC:
2020 Aerial Imagery with Elevation Contours Overlain
Page 64 of 785
Page 65 of 785
Page 66 of 785
Page 67 of 785
Page 68 of 785
Page 69 of 785
Page 70 of 785
Page 71 of 785
Page 72 of 785
Page 73 of 785
Page 74 of 785
Page 75 of 785
Page 76 of 785
Page 77 of 785
Page 78 of 785
Page 79 of 785
Page 80 of 785
Page 81 of 785
Page 82 of 785
Page 83 of 785
Page 84 of 785
Page 85 of 785
Page 86 of 785
X
E 422»,s~\°s«23
‘*7 "*"‘3“““‘
C‘*'“"‘$
zw.v\o.<a2‘1<7u—
;; - 2.x. \-\(>“<3*\°\I.0
Page 87 of 785
Page 88 of 785
Environmental Services
301 Court Avenue, Park Rapids, MN 56470
Phone: 218.732.3890
www.co.hubbard.mn.us/departments/environmental_services/index.php
Notice of Hubbard County Planning Commission Public Hearing/Meeting for

Conditional Use Application 1-CU-23
Applicant: Woodson Property Group, LLC
Property Address: 24519 Fairwood Lane, Nevis, MN 56467
Legal Description: The W 1/2 of Lot 5 and all of Lots 6-14, Block 4, Highland Park, Section 9,
Township 140, Range 33
Parcel ID #: 21.40.02700 and 21.40.04920
Lot Viewal Date: Thursday, August 24, 2023 at approximately 2:35 p.m. (Please allow at
least ± 30 minutes of scheduled time.)
Hearing/Meeting Date: Monday, August 28, 2023 at 6:00 p.m.
Place: Hubbard County Government Center, 3rd Floor Board Room # 324.
Purpose: Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit per Section 401, Table 1
of the Shoreland Management Ordinance to operate a restaurant use.
Above please find a Public Hearing Notice for your information. An effort has been made to notify all
the property owners within 1,320 feet of the premises concerned. To ensure that everyone has been
notified, please share this notice with any interested property owners that may have not been notified
by mail. Should you have any further questions, please contact the Environmental Services Office at
218-732-3890.
Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment (PC/BOA) hearing/meeting agenda items (i.e. applications

and related documents), composition and duties, meeting procedure, and findings of fact may be
viewed on the Hubbard County website (www.co.hubbard.mn.us) by clicking on the homepage
“Agendas, Summaries & Minutes” link and then on the “Meetings” link on the subsequent webpage
that opens.
Written comments/materials on any agenda items must be submitted to Hubbard County

Environmental Services, 301 Court Ave., Park Rapids, MN 56470 by 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday,
August 23, 2023 and include the submitter’s complete name and address of residence.
Eric Buitenwerf, Env. Services Director  Bryan Haugen, Asst. Env. Services Director  Staci Lee, Admin. Asst.
Env. Specialists: Aaron Anderson, Demey DeJong, Kal Larson  GIS Supervisor: Jack Bovee
Hubbard County is an equal opportunity employer
Page 89 of 785
RECEIVED
AUG
99$
5745-
5’?
[A rrl7>pP_np;v
rH1/KW
p
7L0 W
.«L:_
i‘2?. . . _ ‘
aw 2cma%v:
J 7:/)z=rc_/_,:§/1'7‘
nn)/ 1/mom -91} bad. or
?ggog ~/ ’
ffa/:2
?g zgjé 2-1 .
wH '
rm /m
3
?r
r‘
mg
I/Pr‘/V
_5a/I
m/0.5»in rqa__m1«p
///W éasgzg
mo‘-f 7‘ '
OJ r
.
Dam v
3)’? Page 90 of 785
'
.~.\ n >1:
Page 91 of 785
RECEIVEDAUG152023
My name is Roger Scott and I have a summer home at 20262 Fairwood Dr., Nevis.. My email is in
opposition to the proposed restaurant bar on Musky Bay on Lake Be||eTaine.
The Woodson property group is proposing a bar/restaurantcapable of supporting 90 people and six
employees on Muskie Bay. With the exception of the Woodson cabins the area is residential. The
Woodson property group proposes a restaurant/barthat would support 90 people and six employees
would result in potential automobile and boat traffic congestion in the area. The area already has high
density housing, and the addition ofa commercial restaurant will create more congestion problems
especially during high tourist months. Boat traffic in Muskie Bay is already heavy at times and increased
boat traffic could present environmental issues. The proposal is just too big for the location.
A smaller facility that would serve area residents and limited boat traffic would be more appropriate. A
limited Resturant/baralong the size of the original Anchor Inn would be a welcome addition to the area.
I am not opposed to the entire proposal, but I am opposed to this size.
Sent from the Scott's iPad
Page 92 of 785
RECEIVEDAUG172023
Hubbard County Environmental Services & Planning Commission:
I am writing to express concerns about the proposed bar/restaurant at the Woodson resort on
Lake Belle Taine.
"Muskie Bay," where the Woodson resort is located, is a small bay (25 acres) with limited access
and dense development (primarily 100' lots).
It is likely the most densely developed, heavily-traf?cked area on Belle Taine.
In recent years the boat traffic on the bay has caused considerable issues to the point where many
residents are attempting to get the bay designated "no wake" in an attempt to limit shore damage,
decrease dangerous boating activity and generally improve life for shoreline residents.
For example, because the bay is less than 400' wide in many places, most of the heavy
tubing/water skiing/jet skiing activity that occurs within the bay is in violation of the 150'
shoreline wake rule whenever boaters turn at speed.
While the new bridge planned for this fall to the island will possibly alleviate some of the fast
boat traf?c by allowing easier access to the "big lake," it will also allow easier access and likely
encourage more casual activity into the bay.
The bar/restaurant application is allowing for 90 patrons and a 13 boat clock,which would be
adding signi?cantly more traf?c to a bay that is already over-trafficked. The proposed dock
would be 25% longer and more than twice as large as any other docks in the bay.
A favorite time for many shore residents are the early evenings when the boat traf?c subsides,
and they can sit on the shoreline or docks and enjoy some relative peace and tranquility. As this
would be prime time for a bar/restaurant, that limited "tranquility" time would be lost.
It makes no sense to add this type of faculty at this location, but if this were approved, at least
significant conditions beyond what are proposed should be included.
Appropriate conditions:
Dock limited to 60' and 6 slips.
Capacity 40 or less.
No outside ampli?ed music or sound of any type.
These would at least limit the increased pressure on the bay to some extent.
Rod Hunter
20303 Fariwood Dr.
Nevis
Page 93 of 785
AUG1 720
Eric Buitenwerf
From: jlstanwick@gmai|.com
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 3:23 PM
To: Eric Buitenwerf
Subject: Woodsen Conditional Application Board of Adjustment Hearing
—
Attachments: To Whom It May Concern.docx
Eric I wish to go on record as being opposed to issuing a conditional use permit to operate a bar/restauranton the
—
resort located at 24519 Fairwood Lane. I hate to see something grandfathered in that is not what was originally
intended. Neighbors are opposed. I tried to provide some background. See attached information.
Jinx L Stanwick
24443 Fairwood Lane Nevis, MN. 56467
—
218-652-3437-(house)
Page 94 of 785
1 7 20
AUG
RECEIVED
23
To Whom It May Concern:
I wish to go on record as being opposed to issuing a conditional use permit to operate a bar/restaurant
on the resort located at 24519 Fairwood Lane.
Residential neighborhood - dead end road. We have lived in close proximity to the resort for over
50 years. While there have been many changes in the neighborhood during that time, it is still primarily
a quiet residential development. Lake Belle Taine is a busy recreational paradise in the summer months.
But until recent years many properties in our vicinity were seasonal or a second home. It is my
understanding the current resort owners wish to remain open through the winter months and add a
bar/restaurant. We live in a rural setting rather than the cities or a small town by choice. We
appreciate the serenity and natural beauty of our surroundings. I would hate to see that change.
Move from seasonal to year-round operation. This is unfortunate! while the number of resorts in
the state has declined greatly over the last few years, there is just not enough fall and winter business to
make staying open profitable. Note, the highly successful eating establishments in Dorset (Restaurant
Capital) operate Memorial Day to Labor Day. During our tenure as a resort owner, we learned short
stays (one or two nights) attract a different type of clientele than annual family vacations of several
weeks. Cleaning cabins was one of our major costs. The shorter the stay, the greater our cleaning costs
and the smaller our profit. Maintaining a rental property in the fall is challenging, doing so throughout
the winter has many obstacles (pipes freeze, snow piles up, heat costly, help not available).
Ownerlmanager not on site. Families appreciate a clean we||—maintained property. Currently, it is

my understanding the owners do not live on site. I am not aware of a manager on duty. Guests are
issued a code to gain admittance to their cabin. I have no idea who cleans the cabins. There is no one
available to address any unfortunate situation. A bar/restaurantwould certainly complicate this
situation. Just driving by this past winter, we noticed the first heavy snowfall a tree limb punctured a
hole in the roof of cabin #4, the pump house door would not remain closed and was chained to a tree,
the water mat was dumped behind the cabins under the pine trees to collect sap and provide something
for the squirrels to chew on.
Noise! As resort owners, we restricted use of personal watercraft and 4 wheelers because the noise
was offensive to others in the bay. We posted and enforced rules which included a quiet time in the
evening. Campfires were allowed. We built a theater and showed movies in the evening but worked to
live in harmony with our surroundings. While we did not live on the property, we maintained office
hours on a daily basis and were always close by. We catered to families with children. We interacted
with our guests.
Parking? Parking has always been an issue on the resort. lfyou think 7 cabins means you need only 7
parking spaces you would be mistaken. Family members may arrive at separate times from separate
directions. Some are pulling boats and trailers packed with gear. It is not uncommon that a cabin that
sleeps 6-8 would require 3-4 parking spaces. Currently, there is barely space for 6 vehicles in the parking
lot adjacent to the cabins. We designated the area between the old foundation and the township road
as overflow parking and parking for boat trailers. We were asked not to allow guests to park along or
block the township road. Plans to build a restaurant would complicate the parking situation for the
resort. The space cannot be used for both. The proposal to add additional parking space across the road
presents lighting and safety issues. Have you considered handicapped accessibility? Where will delivery
trucks park? I can tell you guests will complain and refuse to walk to a parking lot across the road. They
will double park and park along the township road.
Page 95 of 785
History We owned and operated Resort Content for 28 years. My husband and I were teachers
employed in the area. We purchased the property from the bank following a foreclosure. it was very
run down and without an established clientele. We struggled to remodel cabins (they were not
structurally sound) and build a clientele that returns summer after summer. Over time we developed a
very successful business and made many lifelong friends.
Struggle to meet State and Local requirements. The resort is listed as nonconforming. Working
with environmental services to improve the facility was a given. We applied for and received a state
grant to install the septic system. But that was 30 years ago. Over time new regulations come into
existence and systems need to be upgraded. Sealing old wells on the property was required. Drainage
or runoff was an issue. Permission to pave the washed out driveway was finally granted but did not
include the parking area. The consultant recommended diverting the water (center flower bed), adding
a curb, and building a drainage box (upper deck) to handle the runoff. Some of these measures no
longer exist. Despite work on the well we battled rusty water for several seasons. After a two—year
struggle with the plumbing division at the state we were finally granted permission to put in a water
softener. Up until that time we were forced to use harsh chemicals to clean sinks, stools, and tubs. We
paid a local company to service and maintain the softener for us. I cannot begin to imagine how the
addition of a bar/restaurantwould impact the water supply. The application mentions a new septic
system for the bar/restaurantbut leads one to believe the intent is to access the current water supply.
Over the years we explored many options or ways to expand what the resort had to offer. We
considered adding RV sites on the land across the road. But learned only one site was possible because
of over density in the lower tier. We tried to buy additional land which would give us direct access from
county road #18 but the owner was not interested in selling. We even had Mr. Buitenwerf researching
the possibility of adding a floating houseboat unit.
Old "Anchor Inn’’ The Woodson application requests permission to rebuild the old "Anchor Inn” and
call it "The Anchor". The original "Anchor Inn‘' existed in a small building very close to the lake. We
could not fix up the building and use it as a rental unit. We were given permission and a permit to
upgrade the building as an accessory structure and use it as our office. It consists of one bedroom, a
bathroom, and an open living/dining area. The kitchen consisted ofa refrigerator and a counter top
microwave. Some individuals have suggested this is currently being used as a rental unit. This certainly
impacts the density and noticeably influences the need for parking. I do not know if it is licensed with
the state as a rental unit.
Why does the foundation exist? The family that owned the resort immediately prior to our
purchasing the business from the bank around 1990 lived for several years in what is now cabin #3.
Eventually they purchased a double wide mobile home, poured a foundation, and made this their home
on the resort. When we purchased the resort, the bank discovered they did not lay claim to the double
wide home. We had a home further down the road so we had no reason to be interested in purchasing
what existed. The family moved the double wide unit elsewhere and lived in it for many years. All that
was left on site was the foundation (3 block walls and a wood structure lakeside that soon collapsed).
The husband did operate a small bar in the basement of this structure for some time. It was a popular
"watering hole" for 3-4 individuals. It was not properly licensed when we purchased. They had fallen on
hard times.
Maintaining a buildable site. At one point we moved forward to maintain the area as a buildable site
for a lodge. Our thinking was along the lines of rooms and showering facilities to accommodate short
stays such as during hunting season. We talked about limited food sen/ice such as pizzas and ice cream.
Page 96 of 785
We never had any desire to include a bar and/orfull food service here. We never moved forward
because of the close proximity to the road/neighbors and lack of parking. There were always other
priorities that needed our attention. During the tenure of the individuals who purchased the resort
from us the wall on the roadside collapsed and was rebuilt. I do not know what kind of arrangements
they made with environmental services.
Septic and Parking Plans —The proposed plans are more complicated and involved than what they
seem at first. When we put the septic system in for the resort years ago, we discovered if it was not part
of the hole dug for the tanks it had dirt from the hole piled on it. A lot ofclean-up and landscaping was
required following the project to protect the integrity of the area and prevent washouts. This plan may
uncover similar problems. Does the plan include upgrades to the existing resort septic system? It is my
understanding the area must be kept free of brush and other undergrowth. What will keep people from
driving on the drain field? Will the parking area be paved? How will the contractors deal with the
difference in elevation between the road and the proposed parking area? Digging into the bank or
lowering the elevation may require adjustments to the pipes that feed the existing resort drain field.
You are pumping sewage uphill. Road work has cut the line in the past. The township frowns on having
their road torn up. We had to have a well driller shoot a line under the road from the storage
building/fish cleaning house to the pump house to access water on the other side of the road. Electrical
hook up was also fed through this access point. Nothing is ever as simple as it seems!
Questions??? I have more questions than answers. Doesn't building a bar/restaurant(90 customers
and 6 employees) and adding 12-13 slips at the shoreline go way beyond the original plans and effort to
maintain a buildable site? Have you analyzed the impact of noise and traffic on the adjoining property
owners in particular and the neighborhood in general? Have you approached other property owners?
Are you aware of how your neighbors feel? Will you take steps to protect the shoreline and the lake for
all to enjoy? How will a restaurant impact the resort business? Will it change the type of clientele?
What are your priorities the resort or the restaurant? Who will address complaints and concerns? What
are your goals?
Final Thoughts! In my opinion, the bar (alcohol use) contributed to the decline in resort business years
ago. Over the years my husband and I invested a lot of time and energy as well as money into the resort
business, I want it to succeed. Ifyou want to spend money there are improvements that would greatly
benefit the resort.
Respectfully Submitted
Jinx L. Stanwick
24443 Fairwood Lane —

Nevis, MN. 56467
218-652-3437 (house)
218-255-3298 (cell)
Page 97 of 785
RECEIVED
AUG
132023
To Whom this May Concern,
RE: Conditional use permit application 1—CU-23(Woodson Property Group, LLC)
We own the property at 20231 Fairwood Drive, Nevis MN 56467 (Across the bay from the CU applicant). We
would be willing to support approval of the restaurant CUP request as long as certain reasonable conditions
are placed on the permit. These conditions would be necessary due to the following current hazardous
conditions related to the use of Muskie Bay:
—
Signi?cant boat traffic and recreational activities in a very small bay is causing the following issues
(Sheriff's reports available):
0 Public safety issues related to too many boaters pulling towable’s (tubes, etc.) in a small area
(less than 30 acres and very narrow).
DNR ordinance violations related to towable’s and low speed (large wake) boats too close to
docks and shorelines duo to compression.
Large wakes causing shoreline erosion and tree loss leading to nutrient loading, poor water
quality and excessive weeds.
Paddle boarders, paddle boats, kayakers, anglers, and swimmers have been placed in
dangerous conditions due to excessive boat traf?c (towable’s) in a small area.
Narrow small bay causes towable’s and other boat and personal watercraft traf?c to be a
signi?cant nuisance to shoreline owners due to the circling, repetitive noise, and large waves.
We would be willing to support approval of the restaurant CUP reguest as long as conditions are placed on
the permit, which include but are not limited to:
- Due to the signi?cant additional boat traf?c generated by a restaurant that will add to the existing
hazardous conditions identi?ed above, we are requesting:
O Permit approval on the condition of a DNR no wake zone application and ordinance approval
within Muskie Bay.
0 No outside music (eitherliveorotherwise)duetothe abilityforsoundtotravel acrosswater
within a small bay.
Primary channel access to the restaurant will consist of the use of the entire bay due to the lone entry point
currently available at the opposite end of the bay from the restaurant. A proposed new bridge and/or
culvert next to proposed restaurant will not provide access to the majority of boats.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Al & Cindy Lundstrom

20231 Fairwood Drive, Nevis MN 56467
[email protected]
Page 98 of 785
1820
AUG
;' 9' R?pgmwm

M33325jun D139
,J,L_
;g&
4.3
n
r? 42.9 55;;
.“,
* Q
(J is
aJo‘I%~. "m Amym“ ~m\;
Page 99 of 785
130,; ha Egg
’Eu._5>,(\
ém
vrm
3
‘
ce.vW...,9a4sgm;
/\/wig‘ mm. 55%?
Page 100 of 785

//M1
T4<1??-
T
.
904/(@Z/L\A/c‘/‘(>30
404111/E.
V
18
RECEWEDAUG
N?W3/
WM (4%/4:7
gmm/ma @;;;’;g;1W;?mg
; TT
-a A4m?a1g<A;L2zmé11améoAJ32ra:Qw.
T
/‘Ms/z4? up4ALTT_,T!TTT
45146 la/£/izmi 12265/1/2:0 A
T
TT,
T‘
“T'T;__i 24Z?Z0’Z'I(<;ELQEH11/jPJ;4‘_L1C%??7_T0N1’:0_/L_Ié}
cvaz?ifcs/Uz4t—e T
ggg :4Té:zMn’¢orL;4 émuzuo MgoomyT

T
{ /mnmv aaaaa?é/az1a€zo;:;2o4m4¢éz:a«c4/u¢aéT _T _
,
T-._T,.TT,T
T_¢446¢aL_4umZ.z.<ruaA-A/_7:ag ,TT_TTT
_TTT
{
\¢/a H/412 Asmmz?zzaggmlm/ggge?magm .__TT_TT
T TT
TTTTTTT_T_;T_TTzmmmumgégxgzaamrwggmg?4a;Qz£so;m;T
T
_.__._'
TT_T._TT:(».r¢e Frwscé/45f:1sfFe2sJ¢zA!2éQLL@4a:2;,.»:¢1 TT
TT
([ae§?__g-TTTT
EAL/44'&é£_7a4»Qa:q:LroTcou.:mae_££?$£z.eeg : »
1
_TTT_TTT_T ¢Lm1/M?aT£;¢dz&MAm?mu&,_.TTTTTT
T
1 g??éi?m/zT?244.ucAunLgoT<z1j_TT-
TTTTTTTTTT.-TTTTTTT ?TE.z4LLa/
T
éa?Lé?£fdMfB??é¢&..T-§AUM&Q4A/ _T.
' ,TTI‘?éTt/é_TTT/Z’I4T4£
19L.TI§:7fQTéTTT___T
__
_.T T
TT T_.T T
‘ 4é TT
41a: Pas2g3wg‘s4TJ41z¢:étz4TM«f:TTI?z
+.z1;;112y_a@gz4za5;zizx¢q_’_TT
€24.45
;T.iéA./Tf?t/TTT’Tlf¥§ T
ocm. 54‘T6_?/Lé‘Z_x{_,€»._41Z§E?);/T[Q5/.T4)(1A/(p¢
‘>4
TT
-
TT
T- T
TT
T.4400L4E8c2&/L101A[¢L
TT_TT_T&4z;Q__§’m1zA2zzz2;a¢AZ;z4z1;8z4£,Tw£&TMMé8
Irtrlll<7 * _ > 4r
g?T_ T '>- T
_T__FA?;§_1,J4.’;€«;_’i’lé£%.l4tLé14ZS_4>:t’:2»5TL415;?I4»L4O
AzTz.ag4:>T¢;gr4;«»_aT:x;T(;T»,a«TzT2T. 2:mgT;ur¢TTT
Tszuzu
‘
Page 101 of 785

_T
RECEIVEDAUG
21 2923
Sandra Stafford-Senst
18278 Grandview ave
Lamberton, Mn. 56152
8-18-23
To whom it may concern,
I am opposed to the planning of a restaurant, on Lake Belle Taine, Muskey Bay. We own our cabin, on
Muskey Bay, and enjoy the peace and quietness on our bay. I am very concerned of the traffic a
restaurant would cause on roadway and in the water. I have children and grandchildren who enjoy
paddle boats, kayaking and paddle boarding. The additional boats could jeapordize their safety. I also
am concerned ofthe noise factor, if they have loud quests on patio, noise travels on the water. We very
much love to sit out on the dock and listen to the Ioons especially at night. Also being afraid of live
bands, that could be playing until late.
Since rely,
/M/zMM/we
Sandra Stafford-Senst
Page 102 of 785

RECEIVEDAUG212023
August 14,2023
To whom it may concern,
RE: Conditional use permit application 1-CU-23
We have owned the property @ 20267 Fairwood Drive Nevis, MN 56467 for 11 years and it is our
understanding that a conditional use permit has been applied for regarding restaurant use @ 24519
Fairwood Lane Nevis, MN 56467. We feel that having a dining option on the water would be a great
addition to the community.
We do however have some concerns. Last year we had contacted the Sheriff inquiring about
implementing a no-wake zone in Muskie Bay due to the high amount of tubing and jet skiing that takes
place in such a con?ned area. We had concerns about safety and our shoreline was also being impacted
due to the high water and waves from boat traf?c. There are 30 acres of surface area in the bay with 51
properties bordering the bay, approximately 6500 ft. of shoreline and 65 vessels including ?shing,
pontoon, ski boats and personal watercraft. We have some very old White Pines we were concerned
about and added some rip-rap to our shoreline. We also along with some of our neighbors put out white
buoys 150 ft from our shoreline in hopes of mitigating some of the tubing and jet skiing. With the
reconstruction of the bridge allowing two entry points into Muskie Bay and the possible opening of a
restaurant on the water we feel implementing a no-wake zone is needed and would be a bene?t to the
community and the environment.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Mark & Dianne Lindblom

William & Marla Trautz
20267 Fairwood Drive Nevis, MN 56467
Page 103 of 785

AUG212923
r<r-.CElVED
Dear Staci,
We own property at 20404 Fairwood Drive. We are strongly opposed to allowing a large
commercial restaurant to open in a residential and environmentally sensitive area.
A 90 person plus 6 employee restaurant and marina will cause excessive noise and traf?c to what
is now a small unpaved road. Boats coming into a marina would go through a very small channel
where loons and ducks nest and where beavers live. There is also likely to be shoreline erosion
due to the small size of the bay.
The road we are on leads to the bike trail. We, our children and grandchildren often walk and
bike along Fairwood Drive. Having considerably more traffic along Hwy 18 onto Fairwood
Drive will be dangerous. There is not going to be enough parking for a restaurant so cars will be
spilling out into Fairwood Drive creating more hazard.
We make a big effort to support services and businesses in Nevis and Park Rapids. We are not
against new business but feel they need to be in a business area not in a residential area.
Please do not approve the conditional use application for Woodson Property Group.
Sincerely,
Margi and Paul Wagner
Page 104 of 785

RECEIVEDAUG2 12023
A Response to the Woodson Cabins CUP for a Restaurant/Bar
My husband and I live at 20291 Fairwood Dr. on Muskie Island. Recently we received a letter informing
us of a plan to build a bar/restaurant directly across the bay from our home. We are strongly opposed to
the bar/restaurant for the reasons below.
Impact on Wildlife and Environment
Our bay has a beaver den at the west end that has been there for many years and has never, to my
knowledge, caused a problem and I personally enjoy watching them come and go. Close to our bay
through the narrows where the boats go through is a loon nesting area which has also been used for many
years, we take great pride and wish to protect this beautiful species. The tall cattails also provide a home
for birds and other animals that live here. The impact of more boat traf?c and noise would disrupt our
precious wildlife.
Our bay, unlike years ago, now is built up, meaning many homes and many boats. My family has had a
cabin here for over 50 years. In recent years water levels have risen. And the wash and wake of excessive
boating has caused damage to our water quality, trees, and shoreline. Property owners have had to add rip
rap to try and protect our majestic pine trees. And even with these precautions’ trees have died.
Boat Traffic and Safety
We have seen a increase in the number of boats, towable, andjet skis competing in the same water area
with the fishermen, kayakers, paddleboaters, paddle boards, and canoes. Deputy Sheriff Tim Fowler is
aware of our issues, and we are hoping Sheriff Aukes and the DNR can find a solution to this problem
that already exists. If we cannot get our bay designated as a No Wake zone the additional traf?c from the
Woodson bar would be unmanageable.
Noise
The homes on the island are just 300 to 400 feet from the proposed bar/restaurant.
The noise level ampli?ed over the water with ninety people conversing on the deck plus music would be
intolerable. As I am sitting here tonight, I can hear the music at the Iron Horse in Nevis which is a mile
away.
Many of the families in our neighborhood have become full-time residents. This is our home and feel this
addition would affect our property values, but more importantly our wildlife, our peace, and our safety.
I want to thank you for your work and for your consideration.
Tom & Martha Adelmann

20291 Fairwood Drive
Nevis, MN 56467
Page 105 of 785

222023
RECEIVEDAUG
August 21, 2023
Margo Bemardy
20401 Fairwood Drive
Nevis, MN 56467
We moved here in 2011 for the peace and quiet. We are enjoy the wild life and the
natural environment of this bay. We see loons, wood ducks, geese, muskrats, beavers and otters
as well as deer in the winter. We also leave half of our shoreline with Lilly pads for the wild life
to enjoy. Please notice our bay by the DNR is all classi?ed as sensitive lakeshore and sensitive
shoreland. The narrows into our bay is a nesting ground for water fowl and very shallow. Our
bay is at most 17 feet deep. It would drive our wildlife away and erode our shore lands to have
extra boat traffic in the bay. Winters would not be any better since the snowmobiles would
disturb our bay as well.
I live here year around directly across from proposed restaurant site on Conzet Island. If you are
on site, you can see the distance is at most 250 ft from my shoreline. At this time, I can hear
their guest talking while inside my house. If my window is open, I can hear their conversations
without straining. Our little bay is more the size of a river not a lake. It is residential homes
except for the resort and emu ranch. We can also hear the bands in Nevis at night as water
carries sound.
The current restaurants in the area struggle for guests and to ?nd employees to stay open during
the winter season. I believe we do not need one more in this area.
Therefore, it is inappropriate to have a restaurant/bar in our small residential bay. This would be
more appropriate on the large part of Lake Belle Taine.
Sincerely,
Margo Bemardy
Page 106 of 785

2 32023
AUG
RECEIVED
B?anHaugen
From: j|stanwick@gmai|.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 11:09 AM
To: Bryan Haugen
Subject: RE:Woodsen Property
Yes! I think the pictures speak to 2 issues I see as problems. (1) Parking is not adequate for the resort. A bar/restaurant
only complicates the situation. Parking on the township road is a safety hazzard. There are times of the day when
blinded by the sun it is impossible to see vehicles parked along the edge of the road. Not much shoulder on the road
exists. Fast forward a few months and picture the same spots with snow banks plowed along both sides of the
road. The resort and proposed bar/restaurantwant to operate year round. This creates a major problem for those of us
who travel Fairwood Lane on a daily basis. (2) People will park where they please. Without an owner or manager on
duty at all times to instruct people where they should park, they will park where it is convenient for them. They will not
walk across the road to the proposed new parking area unless mandated to do so. Are we to call law enforcement each
time someone parks in a manner that makes it dif?cult for traf?c to move safely up and down the road. On the
particular evening I took the pictures I had to pull over to allow a car from the other direction to pass.
Jinx Stanwick
From: Bryan Haugen <[email protected]>

Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 10:26 AM
To: jlstanwick@gmai|.com
Subject: RE: Woodsen Property
Hi Jinx,
Thank you for sharing the photos of a truck and boat trailer parked along the town road fronting the subject property.
Would you like me to include the below email and photos as public comment to the record for Woodson Properties CUP
application?
Bryan Haugen
Assistant Environmental Services Director
301 Court Avenue
Park Rapids, MN 56470
218-732-3890 ph
www.co.hubbard.mn.us
Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Information in this message or an attachment may be
government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney—client or work
product privilege or may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected. The unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure
of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then
promptly delete this message and any attached files from your computer system and physically destroy any paper copies.
From: ilstanwick@gmai|.com <'lstanwick mail.com>

Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 7:27 PM
To: Bryan Haugen <br an.hau en co.hubbard.mn.us>
Subject: Woodsen Property
Bryan
Page 107 of 785

I would like to forward 2 or 3 pictures to you that illustrate how left on their own people choose to park on the
resort. These pictures were taken on Friday August 18”‘at about 6:57 pm. One car and trailer have pulled in and parked
in such a way that it would be dif?cult for others to park nearby. This is one of the proposed areas for bar/restaurant
customers to park. The second picture shows a vehicle and boat parked on the side of the township road behind the
cabins. This is dangerous, particularly after dark when it is dif?cult to see. Meeting a car coming from the opposite
direction means someone must pull over and wait.
I am having trouble importing the pictures to my computer. Do you have a cell phone number I can use to send the
pictures to you. I took the pictures with my iphone.
Jinx Stanwick
Page 108 of 785

Page 109 of 785
L‘
E
E.
‘E,
L
—r
Page 110 of 785

u w .4‘
Page 111 of 785
RECEIVED
AUGZBZBZ3
Q :1 3-?? X
594 [(5
$910;
Qmk, ‘1%,.z( 5%/7o

Raj/,A_,£,,
/\QLa/L L4,,“ ,
+0 &
'\0 0L/vw
<;J"|—4j"‘a A£*-r1«.z_.L’.dL»Mc‘.2/lJVzJ.5
m.5%M1W¢2 M,Q_0%w¢.{ A4
L
/9.1./‘)
nMJ «Ail
+A.uJla./xj
.94‘, §a4JwLrz»c.Q 3(cL,.M_/ amj
63/wa1,W+\;,u,
M; V
m».JcL 74/
4%”510.545’ 3am.u.,‘0o4Q “FL
u)Lv.. 0-w'L LM~¢,e_/\_,y;_,4J
x-;;w
*_ UK Q M
>/O1
71A,; ,\,u,._,‘
w,_,dvWM,,1. WM aaJ>,a)A«s_+/344:]:/gig)?!
w:;m~;;~w:;:;
Alxw R\/'5 ,4.c/uwuz ‘L/lac//LA4/‘~JL»0’“-““"""”‘“l’J
’
"° <U«.¢m;f,
-{-14-
€o.MyV
A/MKwalhww‘
Ao& LLQ L0/>
”L/‘4/ALLw
‘
1»¢¢LA4.n,.,m4/
Page 112 of 785
'¥”O7A,Vu,»._:L 7[,LL,,_Ug/p, Va; A[,¢-u.£¢QL/\/_) 751541
3wu.mmQ /IA/\A'xb/1. §£L(J1_,.,.)-1,5040 hf‘-’
3 ML it/u. A411 06L
I
7{\/ f/m_LI<
fl/vvJ‘L\jt»~a0o.7(1_
Jflu, /waz?/A,L<Lz. :1/“AZ
/\,cLL[L,/(40«‘w~A—\/3
41
7tL.m/1?
?&“A ¢LmW“j¢?°4R(,
olM*
“
%1i.LuJ1J"‘Z/U1‘/(S.\?
* AW
3/M44/(Axak WM
AL
?t
?ga.\1'2.<.»m§(
_,*(,e~..>
/I-/./(/tzLL./La’-7/"4
U£M~<H“"’L ?”
DV*'“"
/u_:JZ.LALa/X... 14/uvfn
kw u)4»t«j14 Thgom
Wmd
flu.
?,,~U./‘V A/V‘~—?L
4%
«CAL;/Q4
,4j«;Lu,¢z au\_.., W; mrtdfuja ”L€'v C”/V‘
44;./\J\.«~5‘;6n 29.4./>/0449,
11/-/k?£{»O—u.-“’P\.4 mm
I
:'*°;::;<W
W A/Lwwm
Lazwcijvvpg/0
Mf?ww
A/L44
71/‘LL
<'_»\_,é‘L
4/1/L/IQ
<>UJ’C"0L‘
X
mww
‘£u/(JR
0‘/‘Lg,
¢a,«,m,z.¢( m,u/ucalo/L . c~'t1 V}/

J[<M,.L4,w~+$
ca/prw?f‘
J
?gffgx;»f?‘ ‘
;1_.}—v\_n/\/x axvuusa TLBXHL-1
NAP‘!‘(MVIM Page 113 of 785
X /Laue
+e
W /£¥0(JjI$/1fJ0¢xJ(’01\/kA/?"’?},4/! d.(‘(L,g/3
tL..
wucJL.2.4/V.
2_(;</Q/
JLR4. T/W5) a/..,,Q*-£_g,Ku_ Kata
yuur;¢,[/./1_»,_; -/6—DA:lS'
/Kuwi 0L/MJL Ab _J/'lu«,é'J(:xg LJ
\»4/;4’YVL?4(/(A/m,Q
/La/s»\,x..;../1‘ 6) uA4Lu>,4~A/;‘T'[u.
‘H5
/**‘v*/L3/l¢/‘f’~‘Q (L J.W,,;a—é/
M"**',I*-9Qw0w , rue)/*.'3~’2/5)
&
K/0Lg;~¢r-uvL4Q ‘)1! ww. /)5 _ wv. any
‘moi0.c=a,uvuJ J),2,g.,¢,a9L:nu/J
4
A w¢d
6 75/\-A/TL :4”A /A¢,L,,¥/
"W 0”” W\°~'’~
wucdé
\A[_L (.J~LJ3.g_ E wwrz
A W’
gwé i.L¢/
%;>»4a4/
Page 114 of 785
Page 115 of 785

Woodson Property Group's Conditional Use Permit Application

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Woodson Property Group's Conditional Use Permit Application

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Woodson Property Group's Conditional Use Permit Application

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Conditional Use Application

Hubbard County Environmental Services

This form must be legibly completed in INK.

For Office Use

Conditional Use Application Procedure

A topographic survey showing (2 foot / 10 foot) contour intervals.

pnac£L :.\ ‘~10-0"“”°

uew Danni FIE“)

H0 ‘mm w/1-4' 924.5

1.66 Acres = 72,310 SQ FT

Legal Description: 1 .66ac/ 1.54ac

Additional System Notes and Information:

Designer Name: Don Umthun License Number: 1867

Address: P.O.Box 391

City: Nevis State: Mn Zip: 56467

B. Pump Tank Capacity: 2250 Gallons (7080.2l0O)

Rock Trenches Trench width;

Chamber Trenches Dimensions of one chamber (L x W): 4.00 ft X 3.00 ft

Additional System Notes and Information:

*Skip to Pump Head Requirements if pumping to gravity Head Diameter Diameter

b) Lateral Size: 1.5 in. Table2

F1ow(GPM) 1.5” 2" J 3"

20 2.47 0.7 0.1 1

21)End manifold: -2 ft 35 6.96 2.06 0.30

6) Friction loss: Table 4

9) Minimum Pump Sizcao-0GPM & 43.4 ft. of dynamic head

Depth (in) Texture Coarse Frag. % Color Structure Redox

60-84 med sand "

JL 10yr 6/3 s. grain "

Proposed site Boring #2

10yr 6/4 7 s. grain “

68-84 med sand " l 10yr 6/3 s. grain "

Alternate Site Borin #1 _

O-4 sandy loam 0% 10yr 3/2 weak no

<35% 10yr 5/4 1 " " “

Alternate Site Boring!/2

Soil Sizing Factors/Hydraulic Loading Rates

Description of Soil Treatment Areas

Landscape Position lsidehill side hill

Please show all that apply (Existing or Proposed):

Mailing Address: City:__________,_ Zip:

Site Address. 24519FairwoodLn City:NeViS

SlfstemDesigner? Check eVe"Y_:___—__m°”th5- My System needs to be checked

Ef?uentfi/ter—— Inspectandclean twice a year ormore.

-recommend meter readings be conducted (choose one: DailyoMonthlyoYearlyo

Professional Management Tasks

Property Owner Name: W°°d5°“ P"°Pe”Y 6/21/2023

Designer Signature: W 6/21/2023

See Reverse Side for Home Owner Management Log

I Activity Date Accomplished

Caps: inspect, replace if needed j—

5F 3 9'75 Tami: $7» I u

-to-04*» r ( 4 ’"@Q r\ I ‘II let!

Mitigation/corrective action plan:

P \PZSHARE\Fom\s\SSTS Management Plan.docx

Propertv information Local trackin number:

Local regulatory authority info: HUBBARD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL

Owner/representative: RIC_K_& KAY WOOLRICH Owner's phone: 218-265-0762 ___

15oo,1ooo,1ooo/500 SEPTIC TANKS, 1500 LIFT

SlfstemDesigner? Check eVe"Y_:_—m°”th5- My System needs to be checked