International Standard
International Standard
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from
either IEC or IEC's member National Committee in the country of the requester.
If you have any questions about IEC copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this publication,
please contact the address below or your local IEC member National Committee for further information.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Audio and audiovisual equipment – Digital audio parts – Basic measurement
methods of audio characteristics –
Part 3: Professional use
INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION PRICE CODE
X
ICS 33.160.30 ISBN 2-8318-1008-6
CONTENTS
FOREWORD...........................................................................................................................4
1 Scope ...............................................................................................................................6
2 Normative references .......................................................................................................6
3 Terms and definitions .......................................................................................................7
4 Rated values .................................................................................................................. 10
5 Measuring conditions...................................................................................................... 10
5.1 Environmental conditions ...................................................................................... 10
5.2 Power supply......................................................................................................... 10
5.3 Test signal frequencies ......................................................................................... 11
5.4 Standard settings .................................................................................................. 11
5.5 Preconditioning ..................................................................................................... 11
5.6 Measuring instruments .......................................................................................... 11
5.6.1 General ..................................................................................................... 11
5.6.2 Signal generator ........................................................................................ 11
5.6.3 Signal analyzer .......................................................................................... 12
6 Measurement methods ................................................................................................... 16
6.1
Overview ............................................................................................................... 16
6.2
General characteristics.......................................................................................... 16
6.2.1 Linear response......................................................................................... 16
6.2.2 Amplitude non-linearity .............................................................................. 21
6.2.3 Noise......................................................................................................... 26
6.2.4 Interference products................................................................................. 28
6.2.5 Sampling effects ........................................................................................ 30
6.3 Input/output characteristics ................................................................................... 32
6.3.1 Analogue input characteristics ................................................................... 32
6.3.2 Analogue output characteristics ................................................................. 34
6.3.3 Digital input characteristics........................................................................ 35
6.3.4 Digital output characteristics...................................................................... 36
Annex A (normative) Alternative measurement methods ...................................................... 37
Bibliography.......................................................................................................................... 41
FOREWORD
1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote
international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To
this end and in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications,
Technical Reports, Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as “IEC
Publication(s)”). Their preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested
in the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-
governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely
with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by
agreement between the two organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
interested IEC National Committees.
3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
misinterpretation by any end user.
4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence
between any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in
the latter.
5) IEC provides no marking procedure to indicate its approval and cannot be rendered responsible for any
equipment declared to be in conformity with an IEC Publication.
6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC
Publications.
8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
patent rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
International Standard IEC 61606-3 has been prepared by IEC technical committee 100:Audio,
video and multimedia systems and equipment.
Full information on the voting for the approval of this standard can be found in the report on
voting indicated in the above table.
This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
A list of all parts of the IEC 61606 series, under the general title Audio and audiovisual
equipment – Digital audio parts – Basic measurement methods of audio characteristics, can
be found on the IEC website.
The committee has decided that the contents of this publication will remain unchanged until
the maintenance result date indicated on the IEC web site under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in
the data related to the specific publication. At this date, the publication will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1 Scope
This part of IEC 61606 is applicable to the basic measurement methods of audio equipment
for professional use.
The definitions, measuring conditions and methods common to both consumer and
professional equipment are described in the IEC 61606-1.
This standard contains details of definitions and measuring conditions and methods applicable
to professional equipment which differ from those described in IEC 61606-1.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document.
For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition
of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
IEC 60268-2, Sound system equipment – Part 2: Explanation of general terms and calculation
methods
IEC 61606-1, Audio and audiovisual equipment – Digital audio parts – Basic measurement
methods of audio characteristics – Part 1: General
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1
aliasing components
see definition in IEC 61606-1
3.2
analogue full-scale input and output amplitude
when applied to an analogue input of the EUT, it produces digital full-scale amplitude within
the EUT; conversely, the analogue output full-scale amplitude is that which is produced at an
analogue output from the EUT by a digital full-scale amplitude within the EUT
NOTE 1 Sometimes the range of an analogue input or output path may be less than that corresponding to digital
full-scale amplitude. For this reason, analogue full-scale input and output amplitudes are usually inferred by driving
the converters at a lower amplitude (see 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.2.1).
NOTE 2 The ideal values of these amplitudes cannot be defined within the standard since they are different for
different EUTs, and may be modally variable for a single EUT.
NOTE 3 Where these values are unknown for an EUT at the outset of testing, they should generally be
established first (using the methods described in 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.2.1 since it may subsequently be necessary, for
example, to drive an analogue input at –60 dB FS or to measure an amplitude at an analogue output in dB FS
relative to a digital stimulus.
3.3
coding format
a numerical convention used to represent digital audio data at the inputs or outputs of the
EUT
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE This standard is primarily intended to be applied to EUTs which transact digital audio signals expressed as a
stream of LPCM (Linear Pulse Code Modulation) samples; that is, a stream of binary words, directly representing
the amplitudes of successive audio samples quantised at the sampling frequency, and rendered as binary 2's
complement numbers. Positive analogue voltages correspond to positive digital sample values (that is, 2’s
complement numbers whose most-significant bit (MSB) is zero). Many of the methods described in the standard are
applicable to other coding formats.
3.4
decibels full-scale
dB FS
the r.m.s. amplitude of a sinusoid described in 3.10 is defined as 0 dB FS , where the amplitude
of any signal can be defined in dB FS as 20 times the common logarithm of the ratio of the
r.m.s. amplitude of the signal to that of the signal defined in 3.10
NOTE Analogue amplitudes at the input or output of an EUT can be expressed in dB FS by referring to the
analogue full-scale input or output amplitudes as defined in 3.2.
3.5
digital audio interface
a physical medium upon which digital audio data are transferred into or out of the EUT
NOTE Digital audio interfaces may include packaged media (such as in the case of a CD player) or
radio-frequency (RF) carriers (such as in the case of a set-top-box) as well as conventional copper or optical digital
interconnections.
3.6
digital audio signal
see definition in IEC 61606-1
3.7
digital zero
see definition in IEC 61606-1
3.8
equipment under test
EUT
see definition in IEC 61606-1
NOTE In structuring an equipment or installation specification, it is important to consider the way in which the
different elements of the equipment might best be segmented for the purposes of the specification or measurement.
A basic D/A converter, for example, would represent a simple EUT with ‘General characteristics’, ‘Digital input
characteristics’ and ‘Analogue output characteristics’. But consider a large studio mixing console, which may have
many different functional blocks, and many different inputs and outputs of different types and in different domains.
Such a mixing console example might be considered as a collection of different elements; for example, ‘analogue
line inputs’, ‘analogue mic inputs’, ‘AES3 inputs’, ‘channel equalizers’, ‘mix bus processors’ etc. Typically, different
measurement criteria are applicable to each different element, and different performance levels might be specified.
In such a case each element or subsystem should, where possible, be considered as a discrete ‘EUT’ and should
be specified and measured individually. In addition, typical signal paths through the entire equipment may also be
specified, and their performance criteria stated as a single EUT.
3.9
folding frequency
half the sampling frequency of the EUT
NOTE 1 Signals above this frequency applied to the EUT are subject to aliasing.
NOTE 2 Complex EUTs may have an input folding frequency and an output folding frequency which are different.
In such cases, where input or output is unspecified, the folding frequency shall refer to the lower frequency.
3.10
full-scale amplitude
FS
amplitude of a 997 Hz sinusoid whose peak positive sample just reaches positive digital full-
scale (in 2’s-complement a binary value of 0111…1111 to make up the word length) and
whose peak negative sample just reaches a value one away from negative digital full-scale
(1000…0001 to make up the word length) leaving the maximum negative code (1000…0000)
unused
3.11
high and low interference frequencies
moderately high and low signal frequencies of 15 kHz and 60 Hz respectively at which certain
interference effects may be quoted if a graphical report is not required
3.12
in-band amplitude
an amplitude measurement incorporating a standard low-pass filter so as to exclude out-of-
band components above the upper band-edge frequency
3.13
in-band frequency range
see definition in IEC 61606-1
3.14
input word length
the maximum audio word length which can be applied to a digital input of the EUT at its
present settings, for which the least significant bit is not ignored
3.15
interface jitter
timing errors in the transitions of a digital audio carrier or reference sync, owing to cabling
effects or jitter in the clock of the sourcing equipment
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
3.16
jitter susceptibility
the effect on EUT performance as a result of sampling jitter caused by interface jitter on the
incoming reference sync
3.17
maximal measuring amplitude
a signal amplitude of –1 dB FS , close to (but below) full scale amplitude, which is applied to
the EUT in certain of the described methods
NOTE This definition can apply to either a digital or an analogue signal (see 3.4).
3.18
normal load impedance
required differential input impedance of the analogue measuring equipment defined as 100 kΩ
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
3.19
normal measuring amplitude
a signal amplitude of −20 dB FS , representative of a typical operating amplitude, which is
applied to the EUT in certain of the described methods
NOTE This definition can apply to either a digital or an analogue signal (see 3.4).
3.20
normal measuring frequency
a signal frequency of 997 Hz, representative of a typical mid-range frequency, which is
applied to the EUT in certain of the described methods
3.21
normal source impedance
required differential output impedance of the analogue measuring equipment defined as 50 Ω
or less for a balanced output and 25 Ω or less for an unbalanced output in this standard
3.22
out-of-band amplitude
amplitude measurement incorporating a standard out-of-band filter so as to exclude in-band
components below the upper band-edge frequency
3.23
out-of-band frequency range
frequency range from the folding frequency to 192 kHz (or some other stated maximum)
NOTE Signals applied to the EUT input in this frequency range are subject to aliasing.
3.24
output word length
number of significant bits transmitted by a digital output of the EUT at its present settings, of
which none is continuously zero
3.25
residual amplitude
an amplitude measurement incorporating a standard band-reject filter to suppress the effects
of an unwanted frequency, usually the stimulus frequency
3.26
sampling frequency
fs
the rate at which audio samples are processed within the EUT
NOTE Complex EUTs may have an input sampling frequency and an output sampling frequency which are
different. In such cases, where input or output is unspecified, the sampling frequency shall refer to the lower
frequency.
3.27
sampling jitter
timing errors in the sampling instants applied by an A/D converter, D/A converter or
asynchronous sample-rate converter which lead to phase modulation of the converted audio
signal
3.28
selective amplitude
amplitude measurement incorporating a standard band-pass filter to suppress the effects of
spurious components and wideband noise
3.29
standard third-octave frequencies
set of measurement frequencies set at one-third-octave intervals, as defined in IEC 61260,
where these frequencies are preferred whenever third-octave analysis is specified
3.30
upper band-edge frequency
see definition in IEC 61606-1
4 Rated values
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
For a full explanation of these terms, see IEC 60268-2. The followings are rated conditions for
digital audio equipment. They should be specified by the manufacturer.
5 Measuring conditions
Where environmental conditions for EUT operation are specified by the manufacturer,
measurements will be assumed to be valid over the entire range, and shall be so verified. In
the absence of an environmental specification, tests will be performed at a temperature of
25 ˚C ± 10 ˚C, relative humidity of 60 % ± 15 % and air pressure of 96 kPa ± 10 kPa.
Power-line (mains) voltage shall be set within 2 % of the nominal value listed on the panel of
the device being tested. If a range of values is given, the specifications are assumed to be
valid over the entire range and may be so verified.
Power-line (mains) frequency shall be set within 1 % of the nominal value listed on the panel
of the device being tested. If a range of values is given, the specifications are assumed to be
valid over the entire range and shall be so verified.
For dc-powered devices the dc supply voltage shall have a peak-to-peak ripple content of less
than 0,5 % of the nominal supply voltage.
The test signal frequencies defined in IEC 61606-1 are not especially applicable in the
professional context. Although these frequencies are referenced where possible, in general
this standard specifies directly such frequencies as may be required.
All controls of the EUT shall be set to the reference positions specified by the manufacturer,
or to their normal operating positions or to those specified in IEC 61606-1 where none is
specified.
5.5 Preconditioning
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The EUT shall be preconditioned as described in IEC 61606-1.
5.6.1 General
All measuring instruments specified in this standard shall comply with the instrument
specifications in 4.6 of IEC 61606-1 except for variations and additions to their specifications
as detailed in this document.
In general, equivalent analogue and digital instruments should behave identically except
where detailed.
Digital instruments shall be able to generate and analyze data in whatever digital audio
interface format(s) are supported by the EUT.
Analogue instrument outputs should present the normal source impedance as defined in 3.21;
analogue instrument inputs should present the normal load impedance as defined in 3.18.
The methods described in this Clause require a variety of generator modes, which are
detailed below. These are most easily realised using a multi-function generator.
The different generator modes are indicated for each method by a generator block symbol as
shown in Figure 1.
IEC 1824/08
The lower section of the symbol describes the mode of the generator: its function, amplitude
and frequency settings. Abbreviations are as follows:
Amplitude:
• SWP Swept amplitude; the method is repeated at each of a defined series of test
amplitudes
• ADJ Manually adjusted amplitude
Frequency:
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Other settings, as required in various modes, are described in the accompanying text.
5.6.2.2 Dither
Unless otherwise stated, all stimuli which are used to drive the EUT in the digital domain shall
be dithered with triangular probability-density function (TPDF) white dither at the appropriate
amplitude as determined by the input word length of the EUT.
NOTE This type of dithering precisely linearizes the quantization noise of the test stimuli to finite word lengths. It
is achieved by adding a dither signal to the test stimulus signal prior to its truncation to the input word length of the
EUT. The correct dither signal is a random or pseudo-random sequence having a triangular probability density
function (TPDF), no DC offset, and a peak-to-peak amplitude of two least-significant bits of the EUT input word
length. The amplitude is constant per unit bandwidth (white) up to at least the upper band-edge frequency. TPDF is
achieved by adding pairs of uniformly-distributed random or pseudo-random numbers to form each dither sample;
the generating sequence should be long in duration and maximally random, and the extraction points of the number
pairs should be well separated in order to minimize correlation.
5.6.2.3 Accuracy
Signal generators used for measurements in this standard shall provide control over
frequency with an accuracy of at least ±0,05 %. For analogue signal generators, the
frequency may be measured with a frequency counter and adjusted to be within the required
accuracy. The frequency adjustment resolution shall be adequate to produce the frequencies
specified for each test.
Analogue stimuli shall be generated with an amplitude accuracy of at least ± (0,2 dB + 3 μV)
at the normal measuring frequency, and ±(0,3 dB + 3 μV) from 20 Hz to the upper band-edge
frequency. Digital stimuli shall be generated with an amplitude accuracy of ±(0,01 dB +
0,5 LSB).
The methods described in this Clause require a variety of analyzer modes which are detailed
below. These are most easily realised using a multi-function analyzer. However, individual
filters, meters etc. may be used if required. All amplitude measurements specified in this
standard shall be made with true root-mean-square (r.m.s.) responding meters. Filters are
described in 5.6.3.2.
A wideband amplitude meter, as shown in Figure 2, is a simple r.m.s. amplitude meter with no
pre-metering filters.
IEC 1825/08
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
An in-band amplitude meter, as shown in Figure 3, incorporates the low-pass filter as
described in 5.6.3.2.1.
IEC 1826/08
IEC 1827/08
IEC 1828/08
IEC 1829/08
IEC 1830/08
Where methods require variations on the analyzer modes described, these are detailed in the
accompanying text.
Some analyzer modes require the use of more than one cascaded filter (for example it is
sometimes necessary to exclude out-of-band components from residual measurements); in
these cases, the analyzer block symbol is designated with both filters (for example
A INBAND RESIDUAL ).
NOTE If synchronous multi-tone analysis is to be performed, a signal analyzer with additional FFT analysis and
computation capabilities is required, as described in Annex A.
5.6.3.2 Filters
Defined in IEC 61606-1, except as dictated by the revised out-of-band frequency range or the
sampling frequency.
Unless otherwise specified, band-pass filters shall conform to class II or class III response
limits as outlined in IEC 61260. This provides at least 30 dB of attenuation of signals one
octave away from the filter centre frequency and 60 dB, three octaves away. Such band-pass
filters shall be used where third-octave analysis is described (at the standard third-octave
frequencies), and for all selective amplitude measurements, except where a more selective
filter is specified.
A band-pass filter realised in the frequency domain, having an extremely narrow unity-gain
pass-band defined by the sampling frequency, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) record length
and window function, and extreme attenuation outside that band. The width of the pass-band
is the minimum number of bins required to effectively pass the selected frequency, since the
energy at that frequency is dispersed into a number of adjacent bins dependent on the chosen
window function.
The band-reject filter used by default for residual and Distortion-and-noise measurements
shall have a Q of at least 1 and not more than 5, except where a greater selectivity is
specified.
A band-reject filter realised in the frequency domain, having an extremely narrow stop-band
defined by the sampling frequency, FFT record length and window function, providing extreme
attenuation, and unity gain outside that band. The width of the stop-band is the minimum
number of bins required to effectively exclude the selected frequency, since the energy at that
frequency is dispersed into a number of adjacent bins dependent on the chosen window
function.
The weighting filter for all weighted noise measurements shall conform to IEC 60268-1 except
for overall gain. The filter unity-gain frequency shall be 2 kHz. Relative amplitude
measurements, such as signal-to-noise ratio, performed using this recommended standard
weighting filter, shall be abbreviated “dB CCIR-RMS”. Absolute amplitude measurements
performed using this recommended filter shall be denoted by the appropriate quantity
abbreviation followed by “CCIR-RMS”; for example, dB FS shall be “dB FS CCIR-RMS” If a
standard weighting filter differing from this recommendation is used for a measurement
according to this standard, the filter network – and gain if appropriate – shall be specified.
NOTE The 2 kHz reference in this standard is equivalent to inserting an attenuation of 5,629 dB at all frequencies
when compared with the reference frequency of 1 kHz specified in IEC 60268-1.
Absolute amplitude results shall be stated directly in r.m.s. units, for example dB FS for digital
signals and dB u or V rms for analogue signals.
Amplitude results may also be stated relative to a reference amplitude, as a ratio in decibels
or percent. Self-relative results should be stated relative to the measured analyzer input
amplitude for the same channel (prior to any filters), for example in the ‘Distortion-and-noise’
method. Channel-relative results shall be stated relative to the analyzer input amplitude of a
reference channel, for example in the cross-talk method.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
5.6.3.4 Accuracy
Unless otherwise specified, equipment used for measurements in this standard shall have an
accuracy in the parameter being measured of at least three times better than the specification
being verified.
All amplitude meters used for measurements in this standard shall be true root-mean-square
(r.m.s.) responding devices with a minimum required accuracy of 0,25 dB (in-band or selective
measurements) or 1,0 dB (residual measurements) over the range from 20 Hz to the upper
band-edge frequency. This accuracy shall be maintained for a signal having a crest factor of 5
or less. RMS. calibrated average or peak-responding devices shall not be used.
Analogue analysis shall apply an additional allowed tolerance of ±3 μV, and digital analysis
shall apply an additional allowed tolerance of ±0,5 LSB.
All amplitude meters used for measurements in this standard shall integrate the signal for a
minimum of 25 ms to ensure an adequate number of codes are exercised in the EUT. For low
detected signal frequencies the required time shall be increased to ensure that at least one
full cycle of the signal shall be measured.
6 Measurement methods
6.1 Overview
The measurement methods described in ‘General characteristics’ below shall apply to all
EUTs irrespective of their input and output types. In addition, the methods described in
‘analogue input characteristics’, ‘analogue output characteristics’, ‘digital input characteristics’
and ‘digital output characteristics’ shall be applied as dictated by the input and output
domains of the particular EUT.
If the EUT provides two or more channels, the measurements should be repeated for every
channel.
In many cases it will be appropriate to repeat certain measurements for various operating
conditions or control settings; for example, sampling frequency. In such cases, the applied
conditions and settings shall be clearly stated in conjunction with each measurement.
Unless specifically stated, the EUT shall be configured with the standard settings as
described in 5.4. Wherever different settings are employed, these shall be clearly stated.
6.2.1.1.1 Gain
Aim: This test measures the ratio of output amplitude to input amplitude under standard
settings.
Using the method shown in Figure 8, the EUT shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus at the
normal measuring amplitude and frequency. The selective amplitude at the output of the EUT
shall be measured, and expressed relative to the normal measuring amplitude, in dB.
IEC 1831/08
NOTE This characteristic applies generally to EUTs with analogue input and analogue output, or with digital input
and digital output. For cross-domain gain characteristics, refer to 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.2.1).
Using the method shown in Figure 8, the EUT shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus at the
normal measuring amplitude and frequency. The selective amplitude at the output of the EUT
shall be measured for a period of at least 1,0 h immediately following preconditioning as
described in 5.5. The gain stability shall be defined as the ratio of the highest to the lowest
amplitude recorded during the period, expressed in dB.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Where possible, each channel of the EUT shall be simultaneously driven with a sinusoidal
stimulus at the normal measuring amplitude and frequency using the method shown in
Figure 8. The selective amplitude at the output of each EUT channel shall be recorded. The
inter-channel gain matching shall be defined as the ratio of the highest to the lowest channel
amplitude recorded, expressed in dB.
Where a ganged gain control affects all of the EUT channels, the tracking error shall be
defined as the highest inter-channel gain matching result which occurs at any point on the
control. If only a part of the control’s range is to be measured, then that part shall be defined.
The test shall be applied without the signal being clipped within the EUT; it may therefore be
necessary to specify a lower stimulus amplitude if the range of the gain control demands it.
Using the method shown in Figure 9, the frequency response may be measured by applying a
sinusoidal stimulus at the normal measuring amplitude to the input of the EUT, and measuring
the amplitude at the EUT’s output for a range of different stimulus frequencies. The amplitude
measurement should preferably be selective, to prevent the result from being influenced by
the presence of significant noise or spurious components.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
IEC 1832/08
The measurement frequencies can be freely chosen to suit the particular EUT, sampling
frequency etc., but should preferably be logarithmically spaced. It is suggested that the
frequencies be chosen in accordance with the appropriate Table in IEC 61606-1. In any case,
the frequency range shall include 10 Hz and the upper band-edge frequency.
The response should be presented as a graph with frequency on the X axis (preferably
rendered logarithmically) and the recorded amplitude at each frequency, expressed relative to
the recorded amplitude at the normal measuring frequency (or the nearest available frequency
thereto), in dB, on the Y axis.
Alternatively, if a graph is not provided, the frequency response may be quoted by expressing
the largest and smallest recorded amplitudes relative to the amplitude recorded at the normal
measuring frequency, in dB, for example: “+0,1/−3,0 dB from 10 Hz to 20 kHz with respect to
997 Hz”.
Aim: This test measures the input amplitude corresponding to the EUT’s maximum signal
handling capability under standard settings.
Maximum input amplitude shall be measured as shown in Figure 10 by driving the input of the
EUT with a sinusoidal stimulus of adjustable frequency and amplitude. Both the amplitude and
the residual amplitude of the output of the EUT shall be monitored whilst the generator
amplitude is adjusted to the highest that can be accommodated before either a 0,3 dB gain
reduction or –40 dB (1 %) ‘distortion-and-noise’ occurs. The corresponding generated
IEC 1833/08
When measuring maximum input amplitude, any gain controls should be set so that the onset
of input saturation occurs at the highest possible input amplitude, and to ensure that output
saturation does not occur.
If the maximum input amplitude is only characterised at a single frequency, the normal
measuring frequency shall be used.
When de-emphasis filters are incorporated in the EUT input, measurement results should be
reported separately with each available de-emphasis filter, as well as without de-emphasis.
NOTE Maximum input amplitude measurements are most often applied to analogue inputs, and are sometimes
measured against frequency since such dependence in A/D converter devices is not uncommon. However, this
method is included in the ‘general characteristics’ because it may be relevant in other cases, for example when
characterising digital signal paths with non-flat frequency response or with imperfect gain structure.
Aim: This test measures the output amplitude corresponding to the EUT’s maximum signal
handling capability under standard settings.
Maximum output amplitude shall be measured using the same methods as shown in Figure 10
in 6.2.1.1.5, driving the input of the EUT with a sinusoidal stimulus of adjustable frequency
and amplitude. Both the amplitude and the residual amplitude of the output of the EUT shall
be monitored whilst the generator amplitude is adjusted to the highest that can be
accommodated before either a 0,3 dB gain reduction or –40 dB (1 %) ‘distortion-and-noise’
occurs. The corresponding output amplitude shall then be recorded. Digital domain
amplitudes shall be expressed in dB FS , analogue domain amplitudes should be expressed
in dB u but may be expressed in V rms .
When measuring maximum output amplitude, any gain controls should be set so as to
maximise output amplitude and to ensure that input saturation does not occur.
If the maximum output amplitude is only characterised at a single frequency, the normal
measuring frequency shall be used.
When emphasis filters are incorporated in the EUT output, measurement results should be
reported separately with each available emphasis filter, as well as without emphasis.
NOTE Maximum output amplitude measurements are most often applied to analogue outputs, and are sometimes
measured against frequency since such dependence in D/A converter devices is not uncommon. However, this
method is included in the ‘general characteristics’ because it may be relevant in other cases, for example when
characterising digital signal paths with non-flat frequency response or with imperfect gain structure.
6.2.1.1.7 Polarity
Aim: This test measures whether or not the EUT inverts the polarity of signals passing
through it.
The input of the EUT should be driven with a tone burst comprising periods of sinusoidal
stimulus at the normal measuring amplitude and frequency, interspersed with periods of
silence. The sinusoid shall be gated on and off at positive-going zero crossings, and shall be
on for five cycles and off for a period approximately equivalent to 20 cycles. The output of the
EUT shall be examined using a digital signal monitor or an analogue signal monitor (for
example, an oscilloscope) to determine whether the EUT is either ‘non-inverting’ or ‘inverting’.
Alternatively, polarity may be measured with any asymmetrical signal, and can be checked
manually or using an automated device that can sense the polarity of the asymmetry.
Aim: This test measures the difference in phase delay between the measured frequency, and
a component at the normal measuring frequency, when passing through the EUT.
The phase delays of frequencies passed through the EUT should be compared by direct
means, such as using FFTs of pseudo-random sequences, impulses or multi-tones, and the
deviation from linear phase recorded in degrees. The FFT technique provides result bins
equally spaced from DC to the folding frequency. The peak amplitude of any stimulus should
be equal to the peak amplitude of a sinusoid at the normal measuring amplitude.
Alternatively, the phase response of an EUT that processes signals in real time and allows
simultaneous access to the input and output terminals may be measured using comparative
techniques such as sine-wave display. The phase shift produced by any time delay through
the EUT shall be subtracted before recording the results.
The phase response shall be presented as a graph with frequency on the X axis (preferably
rendered logarithmically) and the phase, expressed relative to the recorded phase at the
normal measuring frequency, in degrees, on the Y axis.
NOTE 1 When using impulses, it may be necessary to average the results of several measurements to obtain the
required measurement accuracy.
NOTE 2 When emphasis filters are incorporated in the EUT, measurement results should be reported separately
with and without emphasis.
Group delay relative to the normal measuring frequency may be computed (if required) from
the phase response of the EUT measured in 6.2.1.2.1 by dividing the phase angle difference
at each frequency by 360° and multiplying the result by the period of that frequency. Group
delay should be presented in similar graphical form to the phase response, but with the
relative time on the Y axis.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Aim: This test measures the variation of phase response between channels.
The inter-channel phase response should be presented as a graph, with separate traces for
each channel except the reference, with frequency on the X axis (preferably rendered
logarithmically) and the inter-channel phase difference, in degrees, on the Y axis.
The graph may be replaced by specification of the maximum phase difference over the
frequency range from 10 Hz to the upper band-edge frequency, for example: “+1,0/−1,5° from
10 Hz to 20 kHz”.
Aim: This test measures the absolute delay experienced by a signal passing through the EUT.
One of three methods – identified as A, B and C below – may be used to measure delay
through the EUT.
a) An impulse test signal shall be passed through the EUT. The input and output signals shall
be displayed together on a time-calibrated analogue or digital waveform monitor, and the
delay time read directly from the display.
b) A low-frequency sinusoid shall be passed through the EUT. The delay through the EUT
shall be measured by connecting a conventional time-domain phase meter between the
EUT’s input and output which derives a phase difference based on the zero crossings of
the input and output sinusoids. The resulting phase measurement at the frequency of the
sinusoid may then be computed as time.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
c) A random or pseudorandom noise stimulus shall be passed through the EUT. The output
signal is cross-correlated with the signal at the EUT’s input to obtain a measurement of
delay. The time value corresponding to the peak in the correlation function shall be
reported as the delay through the EUT.
The peak amplitude of the stimulus in each case shall be equal to the peak amplitude of a
sinusoid at the normal measuring amplitude. When measuring a dual-channel device, each
channel should be measured separately. This is because some equipment processes samples
from the two channels alternately; however, this characteristic is also shown by inter-channel
phase measurements.
When delay measurements are made on signals that pass through both the analogue and
digital domains, the timing reference point corresponding to the timing of the digital audio data
shall be specified. For digital signals compliant with IEC 60958-1, the timing reference point
shall be the first transition of the frame containing each sample (the start of the X or Z
preamble preceding the sample data). This standard gives both samples in the frame of the
same time reference.
shall be made with respect to the timing reference point in the reference signal closest to the
timing reference point in the digital audio data.
Aim: This test measures the sum of all distortion components and noise added to a signal
passing through the EUT.
The input of the EUT shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus of maximal measuring
amplitude at the normal measuring frequency. Both the amplitude and the in-band residual
amplitude at the EUT output shall be measured. See Figure 11.
IEC 1834/08
The ‘distortion and noise’ shall be the in-band residual amplitude expressed relative to the
total amplitude in decibels. ‘Distortion and noise’ may be quoted in units of percent (%).
NOTE 1 This measurement is also referred to as THD+N. Whilst strictly a misnomer (since it includes non-
harmonic distortion), ‘total harmonic distortion and noise’, or ‘THD+N’, is the common nomenclature for the most
widely used method of transfer function non-linearity measurement.
NOTE 2 Percentage units are not preferred since they may produce unwieldy results with modern professional
equipment.
Aim: This test measures the variation of the distortion-and-noise measurement with frequency.
IEC 1835/08
The results shall be presented as a graph with stimulus frequency (preferably rendered
logarithmically) on the X axis and ‘distortion and noise’ in decibels on the Y axis.
NOTE 2 For stimulus frequencies above half the upper band-edge frequency, no harmonics fall into the
measurement band. However, it is common to plot ‘distortion and noise versus frequency’ for stimuli right up to the
upper band-edge frequency.
Aim: This test measures the variation of the distortion-and-noise measurement with amplitude.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
IEC 1836/08
The results shall be presented as a graph with stimulus amplitude (preferably rendered in
logarithmic units) on the X axis and ‘distortion and noise’ in decibels on the Y axis.
Aim: This test measures the amplitude of individual harmonic distortion components.
This shall be done by driving the input of the EUT with a sinusoidal stimulus of maximal
measuring amplitude at the normal measuring frequency, as shown in Figure 14. An FFT
combined with a window-width band-pass filter shall then be used to measure the amplitude
of each individual harmonic of the normal measuring frequency at the EUT output.
IEC 1837/08
The amplitudes of such individual harmonics shall be expressed either relative to the
amplitude of the stimulus frequency measured at the EUT output, in decibels, or absolutely
in dB FS .
NOTE It is usual to measure harmonics using the FFT technique described, because the high band-pass filter
selectivity required to prevent masking of the result by leakage of the stimulus frequency is not generally attained
by time-domain analysers; nor are they usually capable of simultaneously eliminating the stimulus with a narrow
band-reject filter.
Aim: This test measures the harmonic distortion components collectively (but excluding non-
harmonic and noise contribution).
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
This shall be done by driving the input of the EUT with a sinusoidal stimulus of maximal
measuring amplitude at the normal measuring frequency, as shown in Figure 15. An FFT
combined with a window-width band-pass filter shall then used to measure the amplitude of
each individual harmonic of the normal measuring frequency at the EUT output.
IEC 1838/08
The r.m.s. summation of all the harmonics below the upper band edge frequency; that is, the
‘total harmonic distortion’, shall be expressed either relative to the amplitude of the stimulus
frequency measured at the EUT output, in dB, or absolutely in dB FS . An example would be
“total harmonic distortion: ≤120 dB”.
NOTE It is usual to measure harmonics using the FFT technique described, because the high band-pass filter
selectivity required to prevent masking of the result by leakage of the stimulus frequency is not generally attained
by time-domain analysers; nor are they usually capable of simultaneously eliminating the stimulus with a narrow
band-reject filter.
Aim: This test measures the amplitude of the largest spurious signal – that is, non-harmonic
distortion component – produced at the output of the EUT, may be measured.
The input of the EUT shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus of maximal measuring
amplitude at the normal measuring frequency, as shown in Figure 16. An FFT combined with
a window-width band-pass filter shall then be used to measure the amplitude of the largest
individual frequency component observed in the FFT below the upper band-edge frequency,
excluding the stimulus frequency and its harmonics.
IEC 1839/08
The amplitude of the largest spurious signal may be expressed either relative to the amplitude
of the stimulus frequency measured at the EUT output, in decibels, or absolutely in dB FS .
NOTE 1 The justification in quoting the largest spurious signal, whether it be caused by interference, aliasing,
sampling jitter or signal modulation, is that whilst uniform noise and harmonic components are benign to the ear,
non-harmonic frequencies are not.
NOTE 2 It is usual to measure spurious signals using the FFT technique described, because the high band-pass
filter selectivity required to prevent masking of the result by leakage of the stimulus frequency is not generally
attained by time-domain analysers; nor are they usually capable of simultaneously eliminating the stimulus with a
narrow band-reject filter.
Aim: This test measures the distortion produced in the rendition of a high frequency stimulus
by the EUT owing to the simultaneous presence of another high frequency component.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
IEC 1840/08
NOTE 1 This method is commonly known as the “CCIF” method, and is referred to as “difference-frequency
distortion” in IEC 60268-2 and IEC 60268-3.
NOTE 2 Presenting intermodulation distortion as a percentage is not preferred since the low figures expected of
modern professional equipment may produce unwieldy results.
NOTE 3 The difference frequencies should be extracted with band-pass filters much more selective than the
standard band-pass filter if the main stimulus frequencies are to be adequately excluded. By preference, an FFT
analysis with window-width band-pass filters should be used.
Aim: This test measures the distortion produced in the rendition of a high frequency stimulus
by the EUT owing to the simultaneous presence of a low frequency component.
The EUT input shall be driven with the sum of a pair of sinusoids at 41 Hz and 7 993 Hz. The
amplitude of the high frequency tone shall be set to 0,25 times the amplitude of the low
frequency tone. The peak amplitude of the signal shall be adjusted to equal the peak
amplitude of an equivalent sinusoid at the maximal measuring amplitude. Selective amplitude
measurements of the EUT output shall be made at the modulation sideband frequencies
adjacent to the 7 993 Hz tone, using either narrow or window-width band-pass filters (or by a
demodulation method). Their r.m.s. sum shall be reported in decibels relative to the output
amplitude of the 7 993 Hz tone. See Figure 18.
IEC 1841/08
Alternatively, spread tone intermodulation distortion may be quoted in units of percent (%).
NOTE 1 This method is commonly known as the “SMPTE/DIN” method, and is referred to as “modulation
distortion” in IEC 60268-2 and IEC 60268-3.
NOTE 2 Presenting intermodulation distortion as a percentage is not preferred since the low figures expected of
modern professional equipment may produce unwieldy results.
NOTE 3 The sideband frequencies may be extracted either by amplitude-demodulation, or by using band-pass
filters much more selective than the standard band-pass filter, if the main stimulus frequencies are to be
adequately excluded. By preference, an FFT analysis with window-width band-pass filters is recommended.
Aim: This test measures any change in the gain of the EUT with signal amplitude.
IEC 1842/08
The results shall be presented as a graph with stimulus amplitude in dBFS on the X axis and
EUT gain in decibels on the Y axis.
If a scalar measurement is reported, it shall be the worst-case deviation at any amplitude from
the gain at the first measurement. However, this is not preferred since the final stimulus
amplitude can be indeterminate and the highest gain deviations are generally measured at the
lowest amplitudes.
NOTE When measuring EUTs subject to high levels of noise or other artefacts, improved results may be obtained
by using a band-pass filter with a narrower bandwidth than that of the standard band-pass filter.
Aim: This test measures the inherent amplitude modulation of a stimulus by the EUT.
The EUT input should be driven with a −5 dB FS sinusoidal stimulus at 0,499 9 times the upper
band-edge frequency, as shown in Figure 20. The EUT’s output signal shall be full-wave
rectified and a set of selective amplitude measurements of the resulting signal shall be made
with a band-pass filter tuned to each standard third-octave frequency between 50 Hz and
500 Hz.
NOTE This measurement may be performed with most commercial IM distortion analyzers used in conjunction
with a third-octave band analyser.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
IEC 1843/08
The results shall be presented as a graph with selective frequency (preferably rendered
logarithmically) on the X axis and the modulation amplitude, expressed relative to the output
amplitude of the stimulus frequency, in decibels on the Y axis.
Aim: This test measures the modulation of residual noise in the EUT as a consequence of
varying signal level. This may be the consequence of unequal quantization levels in an A/D or
D/A converter, or of poor linearity in a digital device owing to ineffectual dithering.
The EUT input shall be driven with a 41 Hz sinusoidal stimulus at –40 dB FS as shown in
Figure 21. The 41 Hz tone shall be removed from the EUT output with a band-reject filter, and
a set of selective amplitude measurements of the remaining noise shall be made with a band-
pass filter tuned to each standard third-octave frequency between 200 Hz and the upper
band-edge frequency.
IEC 1844/08
The stimulus amplitude shall then be reduced progressively, in 10 dB steps, recording a set of
third-octave spaced selective amplitudes at each stimulus amplitude, until the selective
amplitude of the stimulus measured at the EUT output is below the idle-channel noise.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The low-amplitude noise modulation at each filter frequency shall be the ratio of the highest to
the lowest recorded noise amplitude at that frequency, expressed in decibels.
The results should be presented as a graph with selective frequency (preferably rendered
logarithmically) on the X axis and the respective noise modulation ratios in decibels on the Y
axis.
6.2.3 Noise
Aim: This test measures weighted noise with zero signal applied to the EUT input.
The idle-channel noise shall be the in-band amplitude measured at the EUT output, after the
application of the weighting filter, read in dB FS and expressed in “dB FS CCIR-RMS”. If the
EUT input is analogue, it shall be terminated with the normal source impedance; if digital, it
shall be driven with digital zero. See Figure 22.
IEC 1845/08
Aim: This test measures the spectral distribution of the EUT’s idle-channel noise.
The idle-channel noise spectrum shall comprise a set of selective amplitude measurements of
the EUT output, with the input idle-channel conditions as specified in 6.2.3.1 but WITHOUT
the weighting filter. The selective measurements shall be made with the band-pass filter tuned
to the standard third-octave frequencies, not exceeding the upper band-edge frequency. See
Figure 23.
IEC 1846/08
The results shall be presented as a graph with selective frequency (preferably rendered
logarithmically) on the X axis and selective noise amplitude in dBFS on the Y axis.
NOTE The idle-channel noise spectrum may be rapidly computed by FFT analysis of the EUT output under idle-
channel conditions.
Aim: This test measures the ratio of full-scale amplitude to the noise amplitude produced by
the EUT in the presence of a small signal.
The EUT shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus at the normal measuring frequency, of
amplitude –60 dB FS as shown in Figure 24. The in-band residual amplitude of the EUT output
shall be measured after the application of the weighting filter.
IEC 1847/08
The dynamic range, expressed in “dB CCIR-RMS”, shall be derived by reciprocation of the
measured amplitude; that is, negation of the measurement expressed in dB FS . For example, a
weighted residual amplitude measurement of 110 dB FS simply corresponds to a dynamic
range of 110 dB CCIR-RMS.
NOTE The noise amplitude in the presence of signal may differ from the idle-channel noise amplitude owing to
non-linearity of the EUT, or in cases where the EUT responds specifically to a digital zero input.
Aim: This test measures the extent of spurious components produced by the EUT at
frequencies above the audio band under idle-channel conditions.
The out-of-band noise ratio shall be measured at the output of the EUT, with zero signal
applied to the EUT input, as shown in Figure 25. If the EUT input is analogue, it shall be
terminated with the normal source impedance; if digital, it shall be driven with digital zero.
IEC 1848/08
The amplitude of all components above the upper band-edge frequency shall be measured
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE This method is primarily intended to be applied to EUTs with analogue outputs. However, it is included
among the ‘General methods’ since it can be usefully applied to EUTs with high sampling frequencies where
quantization noise is shaped into the region between the upper band-edge frequency and the folding frequency.
6.2.4.1 General
The following characteristics generally apply to EUTs with analogue inputs or outputs, but are
included in the ‘General methods’ since they are not precisely or necessarily input or output
characteristics.
Aim: This test measures the linear leakage of signal from one channel of a multi-channel EUT
into another channel.
One EUT channel input shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus of variable frequency at the
maximal measuring amplitude. The other channel inputs shall be terminated with the normal
source impedance (if analogue) or driven with digital zero (if digital). Refer to Figure 26.
IEC 1849/08
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The stimulus frequency shall be swept from 10 Hz to the upper band-edge frequency in steps
no greater than one octave. At each frequency, the channel separation shall be measured as
the selective output amplitude at each of the un-driven channels, relative to the output
amplitude of the driven channel, in decibels. The process shall be repeated with each channel
in turn being the driven channel, and the highest amplitude result at each frequency retained
for each channel output.
Aim: This test measures the linear leakage of signal from any unselected input channels of
the EUT to any output channel of the EUT, for example in the case of a router or multi-input
preamplifier.
All EUT channel inputs of the unselected source shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus of
variable frequency at the maximal measuring amplitude. The channel inputs of the selected
source shall be terminated with the normal source impedance (if analogue) or driven with
digital zero (if digital). Refer to Figure 26.
The stimulus frequency shall be swept from 10 Hz to the upper band-edge frequency in steps
no greater than one octave. At each frequency, the selective output amplitude at each of the
channel outputs shall be measured relative to the output amplitude if the hostile source were
selected, in decibels.
decibels on the Y axis. Alternatively, a single result may be quoted as the worst cross-talk into
any channel at the high and low interference frequencies.
The process may be repeated for all representative combinations of selected and unselected
sources. In this case, each graph point, or single result, should reflect the performance of the
worst-case source pair.
Aim: This test measures the linear leakage of signal from all input channels of the EUT to any
channel of the EUT output. This measurement is only relevant for an EUT capable of
outputting a signal uncorrelated to that at its input (for example, when a tape recorder
operates in its playback mode) or to an EUT whose outputs can be muted.
All EUT channel inputs of all selectable sources shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus of
variable frequency at the maximal measuring amplitude. The EUT shall be placed in a mode
that sends a digital zero signal (either dithered or not) to all outputs. Refer to Figure 26.
The stimulus frequency shall be swept from 10 Hz to the upper band-edge frequency in steps
no greater than one octave. At each frequency, the selective output amplitude at each of the
channel outputs shall be measured relative to the nominal output amplitude if the stimulus had
been enabled to that output, in decibels.
The results shall be presented as a graph with frequency (preferably rendered logarithmically)
on the X axis and leakage to the worst-affected output in decibels on the Y axis. Alternatively,
a single result may be quoted as the worst leakage into any channel at the high and low
interference frequencies.
Aim: This test measures the non-linear interaction of signals in the channels of a multi-
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
channel EUT. Since the method involves overdriving of the analogue circuits of the EUT it can
only be applied to EUTs with analogue inputs.
Non-linear cross-talk at high frequencies shall be measured by applying a signal to all inputs
of the EUT using the method shown in Figure 27. The channel being measured shall be driven
at the normal measuring amplitude with a sinusoidal stimulus at the upper band-edge
frequency. The other channels shall be connected together and driven at +3 dB FS with a
sinusoidal stimulus 3 kHz below that of the measured channel.
IEC 1850/08
The ratio of the amplitude of the second-order difference frequency component at 3 kHz in the
measured channel to the signal amplitude in the measured channel shall be expressed in
decibels.
The ratio of the amplitude of the third-order intermodulation component at 6 kHz below the
upper band-edge frequency to the signal amplitude in the measured channel shall be
expressed in decibels.
These measurements shall be repeated for each of the channels of the EUT. The measured
values shall be reported separately as even- and odd-order non-linear cross-talk respectively
Copyright International Electrotechnical Commission
Provided by IHS under license with IEC
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale
– 30 – 61606-3 © IEC:2008(E)
for each channel, or the worst even- and odd-order results among the channels shall be
reported.
Non-linear cross-talk at low frequencies shall be measured by applying a signal to all inputs of
the EUT. The channel being measured shall be driven at the normal measuring amplitude with
a sinusoidal stimulus at half the upper band-edge frequency. The other channels shall be
connected together and driven at +3 dB FS with a sinusoidal stimulus at 40 Hz. The ratio of the
r.m.s. sum of the amplitudes of the modulation sidebands introduced onto the signal in the
measured channel to the signal amplitude in the measured channel shall be expressed in dB.
The measurement shall be repeated for each of the channels of the EUT. The worst measured
value of all the channels shall be reported.
Aim: This test measures the components of the EUT noise caused by the power supplied to
the EUT.
The channel inputs of the EUT shall be terminated with the normal source impedance (if
analogue) or driven with dithered digital zero (if digital). With all EUT controls set to their
normal positions, a selective measurement of the EUT output shall be made at the power-line
frequency. The measurement shall be repeated at the second through fifth harmonics, and the
r.m.s. summation of the six measurements computed. This shall be expressed relative to the
output for full-scale amplitude, in dBFS . The method is shown in Figure 28.
IEC 1851/08
NOTE 1 Only components harmonically related to the power-line frequency are included as power-line
interference. Any artefacts due to a high-frequency-switching type power supply in the EUT are classified as
spurious components elsewhere.
NOTE 2 For good quality equipment with low power-line interference, the selective measurements are likely to be
dominated by noise. It is therefore preferred to use the narrowest band-pass filter available. Alternatively, a single
FFT analysis of the EUT output can compute the sum of all six components with a selectivity limited only by the
record length and selected window function.
Aim: This test measures the spurious translation by the EUT of input frequencies beyond the
folding frequency to output frequencies below the folding frequency.
The suppression of aliasing components shall be measured by driving the EUT input with a
sinusoidal stimulus at the normal measuring amplitude. If the EUT input is analogue, the
stimulus shall be swept from a stated maximum (ideally four times the sampling frequency) to
the folding frequency in steps not exceeding one third of an octave. If the EUT input is digital,
the stimulus shall be swept from the input folding frequency to the output folding frequency.
See Figure 29.
IEC 1852/08
For each stimulus frequency, an in-band amplitude measurement shall be recorded at the
EUT output. This shall be expressed relative to the stimulus amplitude, in dB. The results
shall be presented as a graph with frequency (preferably rendered logarithmically) on the X
axis and the relative amplitude of measured aliasing components in decibels on the Y axis.
Alternatively, the result may simply be reported as the highest recorded result across the
frequency range.
For an EUT with analogue inputs and outputs, a narrow band-reject filter at the stimulus
frequency may be applied to the EUT output in order to suppress input to output leakage.
NOTE 1 This method is primarily intended to be applied to EUTs with analogue inputs. However, it is included
among the general methods since aliasing can occur in any signal-processing element which involves down-
sampling. Thus the method should also be applied to EUTs with digital inputs where the input sampling frequency
may exceed the output sampling frequency.
NOTE 2 The sampling frequency of analogue ports of EUTs for which it is not already known may be determined
by monitoring the frequency of the output alias component.
Aim: This test measures the total amplitude of out-of-band components produced by the EUT,
measured in the presence of an in-band stimulus.
The EUT shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus at the maximal measuring amplitude which
is swept in frequency from 10 Hz to one-half the upper band-edge frequency or 10 kHz,
whichever is the lower, in steps not exceeding one third of an octave. For each stimulus
frequency, the stimulus shall be removed from the EUT output with the band-reject filter, and
the amplitude of all components above the upper band-edge frequency shall be measured
using the out-of-band filter, and expressed relative to the stimulus amplitude in decibels. See
Figure 30.
IEC 1853/08
The results shall be presented as a graph with frequency (preferably rendered logarithmically)
on the X axis and the relative amplitude of measured imaging components in decibels on the
Y axis. Alternatively, the result may simply be reported as the highest recorded result across
the frequency range.
NOTE 1 The measurement is identical to that for out-of-band spurious components, but with the addition of the
stimulus and a band-reject filter to remove the stimulus at the EUT output.
NOTE 2 This method is primarily intended to be applied to EUTs with analogue outputs. However, it is included
among the general methods since imaging can occur in any signal-processing element which involves up-sampling.
Thus the method should also be applied to EUTs with digital outputs where the output sampling frequency may
exceed the input sampling frequency.
NOTE 3 The sampling frequency of analogue ports of EUTs for which it is not already known may be determined
by monitoring the frequency of the output image component.
Aim: This test measures ‘sampling jitter’, or phase modulation, in the EUT caused by
imperfect filtering of interface jitter from the reference sync.
The EUT input shall be driven with a sinusoidal stimulus of maximal measuring amplitude at
half the upper band-edge frequency as shown in Figure 31. The reference sync input shall be
driven with a signal whose phase is jittered with a sinusoidal jitter signal whose frequency is
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
swept from 80 Hz to half the upper band-edge frequency in octave steps. The jitter amplitude
shall be set at the high frequency jitter tolerance limit of the reference sync format used. If no
limit is stated, a peak-to-peak value of 40 ns or 1/(512⋅f s ) (whichever is the least), shall be
used.
IEC 1854/08
The in-band residual amplitude of the EUT output relative to the stimulus shall be measured
using as narrow a band-reject filter as possible, preferably a window-width band-reject filter. If
no narrow band-reject filter is available, a standard band-reject filter may be used but will
render the method insensitive to low-frequency jitter. The results shall be presented as a
graph with jitter frequency (preferably rendered logarithmically) on the X axis and the relative
residual amplitude in decibels on the Y axis.
The measurement may be repeated for other input signal frequencies, for example 1/192
times the sampling frequency (which may identify anomalous low-frequency behaviour) or
997 Hz (which may maximise interaction with data codes).
NOTE 1 This is most usually encountered in EUTs with analogue inputs or outputs, where sampling jitter occurs
at the point of A/D or D/A conversion. However, this method is included in the ‘general methods’ because sampling
jitter can occur in any device where jitter in a reference sync can cause modulation of the audio signal passing
through the EUT, for example in asynchronous sample-rate converters (ASRCs).
NOTE 2 It is important that the active reference sync of the EUT be correctly identified. For EUTs with analogue
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
inputs, a dedicated reference sync input is usually used, whereas for EUTs with digital inputs, the reference sync is
typically the digital audio input itself. However, there are frequent exceptions to this and it is important that all
sources of reference sync are characterised since they may behave differently. This method is not applicable to
assessing ‘intrinsic’ jitter from internal reference syncs, since it is not capable of isolating which products at the
EUT output result from sampling jitter.
Aim: This test measures the analogue input amplitude required to reach digital clipping under
standard settings. This characteristic is sometimes termed: “line-up”, “digital/analogue line-up”
or “D/A line-up”.
For EUTs where the output is accessible in the digital domain, the analogue full-scale input
amplitude shall be 20 dB (that is, 10 times) greater than the amplitude of a sinusoidal stimulus
at the normal measuring frequency which, when applied to the input, causes a digital output
amplitude of 20 dB FS . See Figure 32.
IEC 1855/08
For EUTs where the output is not accessible in the digital domain, the analogue full-scale
input amplitude shall be 0,5 dB below the highest amplitude of a sinusoidal stimulus at the
normal measuring frequency that may be applied to the input of the EUT before introducing
−40 dB (1 %) ‘Distortion and noise’, or 0,3 dB gain reduction at the EUT output, whichever
occurs first.
The analogue full-scale input amplitude should be expressed in dBu; it may alternatively be
expressed in V rms
All controls of the EUT shall be set to the standard settings, or to their normal operating
position where none is specified. Other gain controls in the EUT shall be adjusted to minimize
the potential for overload in the EUT output circuitry.
Aim: This test identifies non-linear behaviour in A/D converters at the point of overload,
especially a condition commonly called ‘rollover’ or ‘wrap round’.
the output signal shall be measured and recorded in decibels. The measurement shall then be
repeated at –3 dB FS . The reported value shall be the second measurement subtracted from
the first measurement, expressed in decibels. See Figure 33.
IEC 1856/08
If desired, the measurement may be repeated at other frequencies to examine the frequency
dependence of the overload behaviour.
Aim: This test measures the extent to which a common-mode stimulus is rejected by a
balanced analogue input.
An analogue, balanced EUT input’s common mode rejection ratio (CMRR) shall be measured
by driving the both limbs of the input with the same sinusoidal stimulus, at the normal
measuring amplitude, with respect to the input’s signal ground pin. Each limb is driven
through the normal source impedance. See Figure 34. The CMRR shall be computed as the
ratio, in decibel, of the output-referred amplitude of (each limb of) the stimulus to the selective
amplitude measured with the limbs driven in common. The CMRR shall be measured at a
range of frequencies from 20 Hz to the upper band-edge frequency not more than one octave
apart.
IEC 1857/08
A more stringent characteristic may be measured by repeating the measurement set with
asymmetric source impedances. One limb should be fed from the normal source impedance
whilst the other is fed through 600 Ω.
NOTE 1 A CMRR test mode is usually available in analogue signal generators, wherein the inverted signal output
is substituted behind its source impedance for the non-inverted output, thus driving identical rather than the normal
phase-opposed signals at the signal generator’s balanced output limbs.
NOTE 2 For a more rigorous method of CMRR measurement, refer to IEC 60268-3.
Aim: This test measures the analogue output amplitude resulting from digital full-scale
amplitude under standard settings. This characteristic is sometimes termed: “line-up”,
“digital/analogue line-up” or “D/A line-up”.
All controls of the EUT shall be set to the standard settings, or to their normal operating
position where none is specified. Other gain controls in the EUT shall be adjusted to minimize
the potential for overload in the EUT input circuitry.
For EUTs where the input is accessible in the digital domain, the analogue full-scale output
amplitude shall be 20 dB (that is, 10 times) greater than the amplitude measured at the EUT
output when the EUT input shall be driven by a −20 dB FS sinusoidal stimulus at the normal
measuring frequency. See Figure 35.
For EUTs where the input is not accessible in the digital domain, the analogue full-scale
output amplitude shall be 0,5 dB below the amplitude measured at the EUT output when the
EUT input is driven by a sinusoidal stimulus at the normal measuring frequency whose
amplitude has been gradually increased until either –40 dB (1 %) ‘distortion and noise’, or
0,3 dB gain reduction has occurred at the EUT output.
IEC 1858/08
The analogue full-scale output amplitude shall be expressed in dB u or, optionally, in Vrms .
The symmetry of a balanced analogue output of an EUT is characterised by driving the input
of the EUT with a sinusoidal stimulus of variable frequency at the normal measuring amplitude.
The non-inverting and inverting limbs of the EUT output shall be terminated with a 600 Ω
impedance, comprising two 300 Ω elements whose common point is terminated to the ground
pin of the EUT output with a further 600 Ω across which the imbalance amplitude is measured
selectively. See Figure 36. The output balance shall be the ratio of the differential output
amplitude of the EUT to the imbalance amplitude, expressed in dB, and shall be measured at
a range of frequencies between 20 Hz and the upper band-edge frequency, separated by not
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
IEC 1859/08
NOTE 1 The 300 Ω resistors should be closely matched in order to measure the output balance accurately.
Matching to 0,01 % is preferred, although matching to within 0,1 % is adequate for most equipment. When
measuring an EUT which cannot drive a 600 Ω differential load, the three resistors may be scaled up accordingly.
NOTE 2 For a more rigorous method of output balance measurement, refer to IEC 60268-3.
6.3.3.1 General
The interface standard to which all digital inputs conform shall be stated, including any
applicable grade or level of conformance. Any dedicated reference sync inputs should be
included.
Appropriate methods for testing the conformance of the EUT are beyond the scope of this
document and should be established with reference to the relevant standard. In general,
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
methods should be applied to establish the input’s handling of both audio and non-audio data,
and its susceptibility to relevant carrier quality parameters, including sampling frequency
accuracy and jitter.
Aim: This test determines the number of active audio bits which are accepted by the EUT’s
digital inputs, as defined in 3.14.
Note that the input word length is important because it defines the generator dither amplitude
used in performing other measurements involving that EUT input. The input word length may
be specified by the manufacturer or (if not specified) may be inferred by the following
methods:
In EUTs where a unity-gain path is available from the digital input under test to a digital output
with greater or equal word length, the input word length may be established by performing a
dynamic range measurement of that path with the generator word length initially set to 12 bits.
The generator word length is then increased by one bit at a time, and the change in dynamic
range measurement noted. The input word length is that where increasing the generator
output word length by one bit results in an increase in dynamic range of less than 3 dB.
In other circumstances, input word length can be established by stimulating the input with a
sequence of samples with all bits set to zero except for one bit, which follows the sequence
1,1,0,0. When the changing bit is within the input word length, a selective amplitude
measurement at one quarter the sample rate (f s /4) at the EUT output can detect the activity of
the bit. With the changing bit below the input word length, no change in measured amplitude
can be detected from an input of digital zero.
6.3.4.1 General
The interface standards to which all of the digital outputs of the EUT conform shall be stated,
including any applicable grade or level of conformance. Any dedicated reference sync outputs
should be included.
Appropriate methods for testing the conformance of the EUT are beyond the scope of this
document and should be established with reference to the relevant standards. In general,
methods should be applied to establish the generation of both audio and non-audio data at
the outputs, and their relevant carrier quality parameters. For dedicated reference sync
outputs, intrinsic jitter and jitter transfer characteristics should also be included.
Aim: This test determines the number of active audio bits which are transmitted from the
EUT’s outputs, as defined in 3.24.
The output word length is determined by observing the bit activity on the digital output, using
equipment suitable to the interface standard specified. The output word length is the number
of most-significant bits which are not transmitted continuously as logic zero.
NOTE 1 If the output word length is adjustable, the output word length used for each measurement should be
stated. It may be appropriate to specify certain measurements at a variety of word lengths.
NOTE 2 The output word length is not per se an indication of audio quality, since the contents of the lower-order
bits is not implied nor assessed by a bit activity measurement.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Annex A
(normative)
A.1 General
This standard draws mainly on traditional methods using simple sinusoidal stimuli and basic
selective and residual measurements. These techniques evolved because they allowed simple
implementation of analogue test equipment. However, they are slow to perform, with each
method needing to be carried out sequentially. Even repeated measurements aided by
automatic sweeps are sequential and slow.
Modern test equipment allows the use of complex stimuli and sophisticated FFT analysis at
low cost. These techniques can enable many properties of the EUT to be characterised by its
response to a single stimulus. Thus can an EUT be characterised much more quickly than is
possible through traditional means alone. More thorough characterisation is also possible
than can be derived from simple sinusoidal stimuli.
A.2.1 General
Multi-tone analysis involves stimulating the EUT with many frequencies at once, and
analysing its output with FFT-based methods. This allows many measurements to be derived
simultaneously, over many channels if required.
A special case of multi-tone analysis requires that the generation and analysis sampling
frequencies be identical to within very fine tolerance. In that case, the stimulus can be
arranged such that subsequent FFT analysis may be performed without ‘windowing’ and that
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
each stimulus tone will occupy only one bin of the resulting FFT. This is known as
‘synchronous multi-tone analysis’, and it has many useful properties. The following subclause
describes a set of methods based on synchronous multi-tone analysis.
Synchronous multi-tone analysis can be applied to EUTs with analogue or digital inputs and
outputs, so long as the sampling rates of the test equipment’s signal generator and signal
analyzer can be synchronous. This is inherent in most digital-to-digital EUTs, and can usually
be easily arranged in cross-domain EUTs by synchronising the analogue generator or
analyzer to the sampling frequency of the EUT. For digital-to-digital EUTs where the input and
output have different or unlocked sampling frequencies (such as sample-rate converters)
synchronous multi-tone analysis cannot be applied unless the signal analyzer is capable of re-
sampling its input signal to closely match the sampling frequency of the signal generator.
For all methods described below, unless specifically stated, the EUT is configured with the
standard settings as described in 5.4. Wherever different settings are employed, these should
be clearly stated.
A.2.2 Stimulus
The EUT shall be driven with a stimulus derived from a wavetable of length 2n samples,
containing a summation of many sinusoids spread across the in-band frequency range, with
all tones executing an even number of precise periods within the wavetable.
The number of tones, frequencies and amplitudes of the tone set, as well as the record length
(2n) shall be specified. By default, 12 logarithmically-spaced tones, each of amplitude
−20 dB FS , contained within a record length of 16 384 samples should be used. For a sampling
frequency of 48 kHz, and an upper band-edge frequency of 20 kHz, the adjusted frequencies
are given in Table A.1, below.
1 23,44 29,30
2 41,02 46,88
3 70,31 76,27
4 134,77 140,63
5 246,09 251,95
6 462,89 468,75
7 867,19 873,05
8 1 623,05 1 628,91
9 3 041,02 3 046,88
10 5 695,31 5 701,17
11 16 675,78 10 681,64
12 20 003,91 20 009,77
NOTE Two alternative sets of adjusted frequencies are available to allow cross-
talk measurement between channels, as described below. If cross-talk is not
measured, only one set of adjusted frequencies need to be used.
The tone nearest to 997 Hz (tone number 7 in the example above) shall be the normal
measuring frequency where required.
It may be possible to use the same sample set at different sampling frequencies, since the in-
band region usually scales with sampling frequency.
A.2.3 Analysis
A.2.3.1 General
The output of the EUT shall be analyzed by accumulating 2n samples and performing a
windowless FFT of the accumulated samples. The resulting data set allows immediate
computation of many EUT characteristics, defined below.
Multi-tone gain shall be calculated as the ratio of the amplitude of the recovered normal
measuring frequency tone to the transmitted amplitude, expressed in dB.
Multi-tone inter-channel gain balance shall be calculated as the ratio of the amplitude of
recovered normal measuring frequency tones between two measured channels, expressed
in dB. Where more than two channels are measured, the multi-tone inter-channel gain
balance shall be the ratio of the largest to the smallest amplitude measured.
Multi-tone frequency response shall be calculated by computing the ratio of each recovered
tone amplitude to the recovered amplitude at the normal measuring frequency, in dB.
The result shall be plotted as a graph joining the points resulting from each tone’s ratio, with
frequency on the X axis and gain on the Y axis. The X axis should be linear if linearly-spaced
tones have been specified, logarithmic in the case of logarithmically-spaced tones.
The phase of each recovered tone shall be calculated as the arctangent of the ratio of the
imaginary to the real component of the complex FFT result. The phase at each tone frequency
shall be normalised with respect to the phase computed for the recovered normal measuring
frequency.
The result shall be plotted as a graph joining the points resulting from each tone’s normalized
phase, with frequency on the X axis and phase on the Y axis. The X axis should be linear if
linearly-spaced tones have been specified, logarithmic in the case of logarithmically-spaced
tones.
Multi-tone distortion shall be calculated as the r.m.s. sum of those even-numbered bins of the
FFT not containing stimulus tones. The result may be expressed in absolute units (dB FS or
V rms) or may be conventionally expressed relative to the amplitude of the recovered normal
measuring frequency tone, in decibels or percent (%). Note that the relative result is
significantly affected by the number of tones applied.
A weighted or band-limited result can be obtained by multiplying the FFT bins by an envelope
of the desired weighting response prior to summation.
A graphical rendition of multi-tone distortion against frequency can be plotted by tracing the
amplitudes of the distortion bins or by summing those bins in, for example, third-octave bands.
Multi-tone noise shall be calculated as twice the r.m.s. sum of the odd bins of the FFT. The
doubling is necessary to include noise inferred to be present in the even bins.
A weighted or band-limited result can be obtained by multiplying the FFT bins by an envelope
of the desired weighting response prior to summation.
A graphical rendition of the noise spectrum can be plotted by tracing the amplitudes of the
noise bins or by summing those bins in, for example, third-octave bands.
Multi-tone distortion+noise shall be calculated as the r.m.s. sum of all the bins of the FFT not
containing tones. The result may be expressed in absolute units (dB FS or V rms ) or may be
conventionally expressed relative to the amplitude of the recovered normal measuring
frequency tone, in decibels or percent (%). Note that the relative result is significantly affected
by the number of tones applied.
A weighted or band-limited result can be obtained by multiplying the FFT bins by an envelope
of the desired weighting response prior to summation.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
A graphical rendition of the multi-tone distortion+noise spectrum can be plotted by tracing the
amplitudes of the non-tone bins or by summing those bins in, for example, third-octave bands.
The multi-tone inter-channel cross-talk can then be calculated at any frequency by computing
the ratio of the recovered un-driven bin amplitude in one channel to the amplitude of the
hostile bin in the other channel; the cross-talk is expressed in dB. Note that the A > B and
B > A cross-talk can be computed separately.
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Bibliography
The following documents contain information that is useful in understanding this standard.
IEC 60748-4-3, Semiconductor devices – Integrated circuits – Part 4-3: Interface integrated
circuits – Dynamic criteria for analogue-digital converters (ADC)
IEC 61938, Audio, video and audiovisual systems – Interconnections and matching values –
Preferred matching values of analogue signals
AES3-2003, AES standard for digital audio engineering – Serial transmission format for two
channel linearly represented digital audio data
AES5-2003, AES recommended practice for professional digital audio – Preferred sampling
frequencies for applications employing pulse-code modulation
___________
--`,,```,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
3, rue de Varembé
PO Box 131
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland
Tel: + 41 22 919 02 11
Fax: + 41 22 919 03 00
[email protected]
www.iec.ch