School Improvement Plan 2023 2025
School Improvement Plan 2023 2025
School Improvement Plan 2023 2025
1
2
a. Access
b. Quality
Introduction:
The School Improvement Plan is a three-year roadmap that lays down specific
interventions that a school, with the help of the community and other stakeholders, will
implement. The SIPs must be able to articulate the school’s strategies for making the
teaching and learning process more effective and inclusive.
The school improvement plan was conceptualized and framed in response to and in
adherence to RA 9155 also known as the Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001 which
states that “Consistent with the national educational policies, plans, and standards, the
school heads shall have authority, accountability, and responsibility for the following:
Reviewed by:
LILIBETH C. BACO
PS District In-charge
Recommending Approval:
Approved by:
SCHOOL LOGO
The symbolic design of the Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School logo is emblazoned
with a strong rope symbolizing the infinity of technical efforts and influences to achieve the
excellent performance necessary for life. At the center of the logo is an open book and torch
that symbolizes knowledge and skills that strengthened and empowered everyone to
become highly competitive and productive, and a lighted torch whose flame kept on burning
which symbolizes the incessant enlightenment, backgrounded by glaring rays and laurels of
the highly competent teachers of the school, that untiringly encompasses the ideals and
commitment of educating and preparing learners for quality and productive life as shown by
a drawing of horse, carabao, plow, and plant that depicts ideal work attitude, values, hard
work, and good harvest, that leads to a happier and sustainable life among our learners.
COOPERATION- observing participatory governance, all stakeholders should work for the
school’s welfare and development.
However, in 1983 the school was forced to vacate the place due to a peace and order
situation. Classes were temporarily held in Barangay Esperanza, Kinoguitan, Misamis
Oriental.
With the perseverance of Mr. Abrea, the school acquired an area in School Year 1988-1989
in Buko, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental, its present school site.
The school is headed by a Technical-Vocational Head, who has the position title of Head
Teacher III. Its total enrollment in School Year 2022-2023 is 331 Junior High School students
and 92 Senior High School students. There are twenty-one (21) nationally funded teachers
in Junior High and Senior High School. Six (6) are males and 15 are females. Out of 21
teachers, 5 are Teacher IIIs, 4 are Teacher IIs, 1 is Special Science Teacher, and 11 are
Teacher Is. There are 2 also, 2 Administrative Assistants for JHS and SHS, and 2 are Job
Order/ Utility personnel in the school and are headed by 1 Technical Vocational Head,
designated as Head Teacher III.
ii. Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School offers the following specializations: Food
Processing NCII, Agri Crop Production NCII, and Animal Production NCII for Junior High
School while the Senior High School offers Technical-Vocational-Livelihood Track wherein
students can choose from Home Economics and Agri-Fishery strands.
The school implements projects and interventions to improve the basic competencies of
teachers, such as different training programs and seminars, and has fully shifted from virtual
to face-to-face; virtual in-service training every October and summer, RPMS tools are used
as the baseline for planning in-service training, as well as coaching and mentoring for co-
teachers. Teachers also undergo a series of seminars/training like Personality
Development, K to 12 Curriculum, and ICT. Meetings are held via online platforms and face-
to-face.
iii. Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School is in the loam-type area of Buko, Kinoguitan,
Misamis Oriental, which is about 300 meters away from the national highway and is
accessible to any mode of transportation. The school has a land area of 9001 square meters.
It is the only agricultural high school in Misamis Oriental. It has the following boundaries: on
the east side is Suarez Road and the KNAS- TESDA, on the south and west sides is an
agricultural area, and on the north side is a residential area.
iv. The sources of livelihood in the Municipality of Kinoguitan are coconut, banana,and
falcata plantations, fishing, as well as private and government employment. Socioeconomic
status in the community ranges from low, to medium, and high. Most of the students belong
to a low socio-economic status.
Learners’ health and safety are the school’s priorities for the current school year. There are
36 Grades 7-10 learners who are wasted. The school doesn’t have severely wasted learners
because of some projects/interventions implemented to address malnourished learners,
such as the feeding program, Gulayan sa Paaralan, and Gulayan sa Likod-Paaralan.
v. Based on the National School Building Inventory report, the school has five (5) buildings
that need major repairs and five (5) buildings for minor repairs. The classroom seat quantity
is 423 and the ratio is 1:1. The school has two (2) big water catchments located at the back
portion of the administration building. 2 small rainwater catchments on top of the 3-story
Senior High School building and 1 underground tank for rainwater reservoir. Each classroom
has its own toilet which is used by both genders. The school is accessible by internet service
providers.
vi. The school which is located at Barangay Buko has built a strong connection and rapport
with LGU Kinoguitan, church leaders of the different religious denominations, and other
significant institutions in the community.
vii. Stakeholders offer their full support to education by attending meetings and assemblies,
concerted effort, and involvement in Brigada Eskwela, as well as pahina whenever the
school needs them. They also give financial support and materials used for any projects
geared towards the physical improvement of the school. Sources of funds are from MOOE,
canteen funds, Local Government Units, and donations from PTA and other private persons.
B. SCHOOL
PERFORMANCE ON
ACCESS
i. The figures above show the actual enrollment of secondary school learner’s years 2017-
2022. It shows that the enrollment rate is increasing in the year 2019, 2021, and 2022.
However, when compares to the year 2019-2020 the decrease in enrollment has been
marked. The factors of the decrease in enrollment were the opening of a new public school
in the barangay (Calubo Integrated School) which previously, in its absence, school learners
residing there were enrolled in the school; and the school-aged population per year in the
barangay by the school is uncontrolled. As to the male and female ratio, there is a great
difference, since the male population is much higher compared to the female population
which has been marked every year.
ii. Based on the data presented there is a 100% Graduation Rate from 2019 to 2022. The
total number of Grade 7 learners is 307 and completed their secondary education in the year
2022 with a population of 344.
iii. No drop –out during the past four years. The main factor in this one is that teachers employ
home visitation to students with difficulties and subject them to enrichment and remediation
programs. During the pandemic, since most of the students are on modular learning both
teachers and parents monitor students’, progress thereby bringing the dropout rate to zero.
iv. Based on the data presented, the failure rate decreased in the year 2018 -2022 and
slightly increased in the year 2021, which is the main reason this year served as the
transition period from normal school trends to the pandemic time.
v. School Leaver Rate is the EFA measure for the dropout rate. It covers students who do
not finish a particular year level as well as those who finish but fail to enroll in the next year
level the following school year. It is theoretically more comprehensive than a simple dropout
rate but becomes unreliable in areas with substantial migration. Care should be exercised
in using this indicator at the level of the Division, Municipal, and Legislative Districts. The
system does not allow the use of the School Leaver Rate at the School Level which is very
likely to result in a misleading measure the of dropout rate.
IV. Good Performing and Problematic KPI’s (best practices internal and
external)
INTERNAL ANALYSIS
FACTORS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
PHYSICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
Classroom Adequate classroom (1:13 3 dilapidated classrooms
classroom-pupil ratio) Poorly ventilated
Substandard
Seats 1:1 sufficient
Toilets 1:2 Insufficient 1 toilet bowl needs to be
replaced
Canteen Functional Tenant Basis No enough water
Social hall Barangay-covered court
utilized
Water and electricity Insufficient supply
Computers e-classroom recipient Insufficient (1:2 PC to
student ratio
Clinic Available but no personnel to No regular health
take charge personnel assigned
TEACHER
• Basic Continuous
Improvement Workshop
3 Teachers (sec.)
Araling Panlipunan
G9-10
MAPEH G9-10
Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School
Buko, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental
[email protected]
09353403850/ Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School ICT Unit
21
Filipino G9-10
English G9-10
Delivery of textbook and Generally delayed
other IMs
NON-TEACHING STAFF 2 Disbursing Officers No nationally funded staff:
• Daytime Security
Guard
• Utility
• Canteen Personnel
• Health Officer
• Nighttime Security
Guard
PROGRAMS AND
PROJECTS
ECARP 74 of the students are readers 168 are frustration-level
(JHS) readers
74 independent-level readers
68 instructional-level readers
Basura Ko Dalhin Ko Implemented
Program
Gulayan sa Paaralan Community Consumption
Feeding Program Short Term (Not
sustained)
Landscaping 80% Accomplished Funding
Concrete Fence 35% Accomplished Funding
School Beautification 65% Accomplished Funding
Learning Kiosk in 3 sets are Done and Used Resource generation
strategic areas in School now.
Resource generation started
School Gate 2 Constructed concrete posts completed
School Road Concreting Budget available LGU Waiting for the contractor
up to Gate 2 to finish the area at Buko
Baybay
FINANCIAL
RESOURCES
MOOE Monthly downloading
Helps in the classroom.
instruction
Full Implementation of R.A.
9155
(Principal Empowerment Act)
GPTA Membership Fund Augment School and Financial
Resources
Internal Analysis S W
1. Sufficient seats, toilets, 1. Dilapidated,
and water supply substandard, poorly
2. Presence of E- ventilated classrooms.
Classroom, clinic, 2. No available teacher to
playground, and bulletin manage the canteen.
boards 3. Condemned building.
3. Sufficient Teacher-Pupil 4. Insufficient computer
Ratio units, books
4. Presence of 1 Head 5. No regular health
Teacher and 2 personnel assigned.
External Analysis Disbursing Officers 6. No washing area, the
library needs
5. 90% of teachers meet improvement.
the NCBTS standards. 7. No nationally funded
6. Science Textbook Ratio non-Teaching staff or
is 1:1. blue guard
7. Monthly Downloaded 8. Short-Term feeding
MOOE program
8. School Financial 9. Procurement process is
Support (GPTA Funds) time-consuming.
9. Accessible to all kinds of 10. 90% of Teachers’
land transportation monthly attendance
10. Access to
communication and
research
11. Potable water supply
12. Easy access to
treatment for medical
and other health-related
cases
13. Gulayan sa Paaralan
develops industry and
responsibility among
students.
14. Ecological awareness
among pupils
O S-O W-O
1. Access to financial 1. Strengthen the 1. Strengthen Linkages
support Advocacy and with LGU and the
• OFW Communication Community
• Alumni Program on • Infrastructure
• LGU • Enrolment Facilities
• NGO • School Performance • Canteen and Health
2. Means of livelihood • nutrition Personnel, Daytime
• Establishments 2. Strengthen Linkage Security Guard
• 4 PS with LGU and • Feeding Program
• Farming Community
Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School
Buko, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental
[email protected]
09353403850/ Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School ICT Unit
23
6. Presence of nearby
health centers,
clinics/hospitals
• Kinoguitan Health
Center-
approximately
750 meters from
the school
• Kinoguitan
Health Center-
approx. 500
meters away
from the school
• Talisayan
Provincial
Hospital,
approximately 20
km away from the
school
• Municipal
Medical Clinic-
approx. 4.5 km
away from the
school
T S-T W-T
1. Plant 1. Train teachers on 1. Strengthen linkages
2. Flood-prone area during Disaster Risk Reduction with LGU and
heavy rain 2. Enhance the School Community
3. Power Interruption Reading Program
C. SCHOOL
PERFORMANCE ON
QUALITY
180
160
140
120
100 Non-Reader English
80
Frustration
60
40 Instructional
20
Independent
0
Pre-Test Post Test
The result of the graphical presentation in the English Pre-Test shows that out of 416
actual readers, there were 26 identified non-readers or 6%, 143 or 66% were identified in
the frustrated reading ability level, 94 or 22% were identified in the instructional reading
ability level, and 157 or 38% belonged to independent reading ability level.
The result of the graphical presentation in the English Post Test shows that students’
reading ability level improves. Of 26 English non-readers during the pretest, 18 were moved
and rose to a frustrated reading ability level. Out of 143 or 66% identified the frustration
reading ability level, only 4 or 3% of frustrated readers improved their reading ability level.
Out of 94 or 22% identified in the instructional reading ability level, 10 or 10% improved
their reading ability level. Out of 157 or 38% who belonged to the independent reading ability
level in the pretest, there was an increase of 4 or 2% during the posttest.
The result of the graphical presentation in Filipino Pre-Test shows that out of 416
actual readers, there were 23 identified non-readers, or 6%, 98 or 24% were identified in the
frustration reading ability level, 132, or 32% were identified in the instructional reading ability
level, and 167 or 40% belonged to independent reading ability level.
The result of the graphical presentation in the Filipino Post Test shows that students’
reading ability level improves. From 23 English non-readers during the pretest, 17 were
moved to the frustrated reading ability level. Out of 98 or 24% identified with a frustration
reading ability level, only 6 or 6% of frustrated readers improved their reading ability level.
Out of 132 or 32% identified in the instructional reading ability level, 9 or 7% improved their
reading ability level. Out of 167 or 40% who belonged to the independent reading ability
level in the pretest, there was a decrease of 6 or 4% during the posttest.
The school during School Years-2023 cannot supply data in the succeeding years since the
results were not published.
The table below shows the results of the National Achievement Test in School Year 2016-
2017 and School Year 2017-2018.
2016-
Subject 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
2017
b. Based on the NAT School Performance results in School Year 2016–2017, students
scored highest on information literacy (37.83), followed by problem-solving (36.47), and
lowest on critical thinking (32.82). Grade 10 students scored poorly on critical thinking and
considerably high on information literacy. In School Year 2017-2018, students scored
highest on critical thinking (41.85), followed by problem-solving (38.89), and lowest on
information literacy (37.41). Students mastery of learning abilities across a range of
academic areas was inadequately developed or gained. The choice to boost performance
in the core subjects must be taken. Furthermore, the improvement in academic performance
was strongly linked to the development of critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Students' confusion and difficulties in answering questions in the National Achievement Test
(NAT) were frequently caused by students' failure to retain the concepts, theories, and
teachings in their classes.
a. Based on the findings; a student's study habits may have an impact on how well they
score on the National Achievement Test. Students rely on teachers at school for review
since they don't have time to read at home. Additionally, because they are busy with their
own jobs, parents don't follow up on their children's daily performance, particularly when it
comes to reviewing and reading notes. Parents ask their children to help with household
chores.
b. They reviewed previous lessons and engaged in improvement/enhancement activities to
assist them refresh the teachings and provided students extra information about the subject
areas before taking the National Achievement Test. This finding suggested that it is up to us
as educators to help our students improved their critical thinking skills. The selection of
teaching and learning activities should consider the demands of the learners. Additionally,
educators must broaden their use of problem-solving and inquiry-based learning strategies,
techniques, and approaches in the classroom. It should also be encouraged to include
information literacy, math, and critical thinking in the teaching of basic subjects.
NAT Saturday Review- the school designed a matrix to maximize the review for the less mastered
competencies scheduled every Saturday from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
The teachers/reviewers from Grade 7 to Grade 12 follow the schedules and objectives in the conduct
the necessary review
Why-Why Diagram
There was a
problem during the
NAT review
especially with the
time. Teacher
interviewed all the
learners that’s why
we must look for
intervention to
make NAT Review
session enjoyable
and interesting.
D. PERFORMANCE ON
EQUITY AND INCLUSION
• Family issues
• Natural disasters
• Lack of interest
• Financial problem
• Work
• Illness
• Bad peer pressure
• Bad vices
• Child labor
• Child marriage
• Pregnancy
• Violence
In Buko, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental, there are 24 Out-of-School Youth (OSY) 14 are
male and 10 are female ages (15 to 24 years old), and 303 Out-of-School Children (OSC)
141 are male and 161 are female (6 to 14 years old).
➢ Learners who are No Longer Participating in School Activities and are at risk of
dropping out:
For School Year 2019-2020, there’s no record of dropout students, same as with the
school year 2021-2022. However, in the present school year 2022-2023, the school has
recorded a total of 10 No Longer Participating in School Activities learners and 25
learners who are at risk of dropping out but able to continue schooling. With the advocacy
of “No Learners Left Behind,” the said NLPA rate connotes the alarming standing of some
learners in access to education.
The degree of family flexibility, encouragement, and expectations may also have an
impact on a student's likelihood of dropping out. In addition, sociocultural and economic
factors may have an impact on the dropout rate. These include gang influence, the sense
of independence brought about by having a job, and a lack of community resources for
helping students who are at risk.
Based on surveys conducted through home visitation and community mapping, these are
school-related factors
o Infrastructural Factors
With the identified factors in dropping out of learners, the school/teachers should not
try to predict who will drop out based on risk factors. Many who are at risk of dropping out
do not fit the profile, and many who fit the profile finish school on time.
For the past years, the school has evaluated programs and practices designed to
save learners from dropping out and those who are struggling in school. Although many
promising activities exist, there are no “best” programs and practices that apply in every
situation.
Programs for dropout recovery and prevention (also known as re-entry and retrieval)
have been created and put into place with various degrees of effectiveness. The paper
divides dropout prevention and recovery measures into two major groups. The first group of
tactics is extensive in scope and is structured around three themes:
(1) Comprehensive school improvement
(2) Increasing students’ sense of belonging in schools, frequently called “school
membership,” and
(3) Increasing students’ engagement through effective instruction.
Promising focused programs for prospective dropout prevention and recovery make
up the second group of methods. Any strategy implementation calls for extensive
professional development. The methodologies typically entail adopting new perspectives on
students who are in danger of dropping out, such as emphasizing their strengths rather than
their weaknesses and using a larger and deeper range of instructional methodologies and
organizing techniques.
Comprehensive Strategies:
Targeted Programs and Practices: The identified targeted programs and practices that have
been identified and aimed to be implemented include:
E. SCHOOL CONCERNS ON
RESILIENCE
AND WELL-BEING
In the school year 2022-2023, among the enrollees, there were 46 students who were
recorded as wasted and 9 students recorded as overweight.
HEIGHT-FOR-AGE SY 2022-2023
Looking at the data, we can see that most students in each grade level are categorized as
normal height. Nineteen students were found to be overaged based on the school age
bracket.
Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School
Buko, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental
[email protected]
09353403850/ Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School ICT Unit
43
Enrolment Weighed
Grade 7 73 73 10 7 3 0 0 0
Grade 8 89 89 8 7 1 3 3 0
Grade 9 91 91 9 5 4 4 3 1
Grade 10 80 80 9 5 4 0 0 0
Grade 11 61 61 4 2 2 1 1 0
Grade 12 28 28 6 5 1 1 0 1
Percent of
100% 100% 10.9% 7.35% 3.55% 2.13% 1.66% 0.47%
total
Feeding Program 46
Health status:
The number of students who have other health problems for the current SY. Indicate
common ailments and the corresponding number of students per type of ailment based on
the results of physical and dental examinations. Insert new columns if necessary.
Grade 7
Epilepsy
Grade 8 Generalized,
Tonic- Clonic
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
TOTAL
Grade 7 0 0 0 1 1 0
Grade 8 0 0 0 1 1 0
Grade 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 2 2 0
F. SCHOOL CONCERNS ON
GOVERNANCE
1. Teacher’s Profile
Name Sex Birthday Status Age TIN Number
1. Sadicon, Cherry Q. F 08-19-1975 M 47 919-981-761
2.. Abcede, Alice D. F 12-191966 S 54 135034-344
3.Acenas, Beverly D. F 11-01-1984 M 33 277-234-183
4. Baja, Julie Andrea C. F 07-04-1998 S 24 398-687-530
5. Bangay, Christabelle Rose
F 09-29-1993 S 29 325-692-656
B.
6. Canonce, Cleo C. F 07-04-1979 M 43 919-981-779
7. Canonce, Mark Ian S. M 10-17-1979 M 43 226-204-847
8. Cuñado, Resyl P. F 07-16-1992 S 30 460-896-922
9. Dipaz, Kimberly C. F 08-08-1994 M 28 349-951-884
10. Tapio, April Rose P. F 04-15-1994 S 29 757-511-764
11.Labor, Earl Cyrus A. M 03-06-1989 M 34 350712559
2. Personnel
2.1 Teaching Personnel (Junior High School)
Position Male Female Total
Master Teacher II 0 0 0
Master Teacher I 0 0 0
Teacher III 1 4 5
Teacher II 0 0 0
Teacher I 2 7 9
Total 3 11 14
Horticulture NC II 2012 1 1
Workstation
7- Affinity 2 2 35 3
7- Austerity 1 2 38 0
8- Beauty 2 2 45 0
8- Bounty 2 2 40 1
9- Charity 2 1 45 2
9- Chastity 2 2 40 1
Grade 10 – Dainty 2 2 38 2
Grade 10 - Honesty 2 2 38 2
Grade 11- Humility 2 2 47 2
Grade 11- Integrity 2 2 4
Grade 12- Loyalty 2 2 33 4
Grade 12- Punctuality 2 2 17 4
Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School
Buko, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental
[email protected]
09353403850/ Kinoguitan National Agricultural High School ICT Unit
52
Grade 7-
2:1 1:0 1:0 1:1 1:0 3:1 1:0
Austerity
Grade 7-
2:1 1:0 1:0 1:1 1:0 3:1 1:0
Affinity
Grade 8-
1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0 3:1 1:0
Beauty
Grade 8-
1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0 3:1 1:0
Bounty
Grade 9-
3:1 3:1 1:0 20 3:1 1:0 1:0
Chastity
Grade 9-
3:1 3:1 1:0 2:0 3:1 1:0 1:0
Charity
Grade 10-
2:1 4:1 1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0
Honesty
Grade10 -
2:1 4:1 1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0 1:0
Dainty
SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W 10 8 9 9 7 6 49
N 63 78 78 71 56 21 367
OW 0 3 4 0 1 1 9
OB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 73 89 91 80 64 28 422
INTERNAL ANALYSIS
FACTORS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
PHYSICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
Classroom Adequate classroom (1:13 3 dilapidated classrooms
classroom-pupil ratio) Poorly ventilated
Substandard
Seats 1:1 sufficient
Toilets 1:2 Insufficient 1 toilet bowl needs to be
replaced
Canteen Functional Tenant Basis No enough water
Social hall Barangay-covered courts
utilized
Water and electricity Insufficient supply
Computers e-classroom recipient Insufficient (1:2 PC to
student ratio
Clinic Available but no personnel No regular health personnel
to take charge assigned
TEACHER
• K to 12 Basic Education
Program (BEP) (3
teachers)
• Basic Continuous
Improvement Workshop
3 Teachers (sec.)
AralingPanlipunan
G9-10
MAPEH G9-10
Filipino G9-10
English G9-10
Delivery of textbook and Generally delayed
other IMs
NON-TEACHING STAFF 2 Disbursing Officers No nationally funded staff:
• Daytime Security
Guard
• Utility
• Canteen Personnel
• Health Officer
• Nighttime Security
Guard
PROGRAMS AND
PROJECTS
ECARP 74 of the students are 168 are frustration level,
readers (JHS) readers,
74 independent-level
readers
68 instructional-level
readers
Basura Ko Dalhin Ko Implemented
Program
Gulayan sa Paaralan Community Consumption
Feeding Program Short Term (Not sustained)
Lanscaping 80% Accomplished Funding
Concrete Fence 35% Accomplished Funding
School Beautification 65% Accomplished Funding
Learning Kiosk in strategic 3 sets Done and Used Resource generation
areas in school now
Resource generation
started
School Gate 2 Constructed concrete posts Funds un- available
School Road Concreting up Budget available LGU Waiting for the contractor to
to Gate 2 finish the area at Buko
Baybay
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
MOOE Monthly downloading
Helps in the classroom.
instruction
Full Implementation of R.A.
9155
(Principal Empowerment
Act)
ACTION PLAN
PERSON INVOLVED
NAME DESIGNATION / ORGANIZATION
1. Janperson Pajaron SSGPresident, Kinoguitan National
Agricultural High School
2. Michelle Mae Salvana GPTA Secretary
3. Paul Aboc Alumni President
4. Hon. Doris Marban Barangay Kagawad / Agriculture
5. Hanna Roqueza Laniton Disaster Risk Reduction Committee
Chairman
6. Hon. Elena Carmona Barangay Chairman
7. Jennifer C. Macabinlar KNAHS Teacher’s Guild President
8. Fe M. Bentuzal KNAHS SHS Teacher
9. Hon. Meriam S. Marban Sangguniang Bayan Federation
Chairwoman
10. Butch Sabugaa GPTA President
11. Christabelle Rose B. Bangay KNAHS - Teacher
NAME DESIGNATION ASPIRATION
Closely monitor the pupils’ school
performances through regular
coordination with the teachers.
1. Michelle Mae Cooperate with school’s plans,
GPTA Secretary
Salvana projects, and activities to enable the
learners imbibe the 4 core values as
maka Diyos, makatao, makabansa
and makakalikasan.
To deliver the best educational
services in order to produce quality
and responsible learners who will
2. Christabelle become productive citizens of our
Rose B. KNAHS - Teacher country through the application of
Bangay appropriate strategies and
techniques in teaching and the
proper utilization of instructional
facilities.
SSG President, Kinoguitan All pupils in KNAHS internalize the
3. Janperson
National Agricultural High value of honesty and being
Pajaron
School makabayan.
Key Performance
Indicator Baseline
Six Years Physical Target
(Quality) 2022-
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
2023
A percentage of
Learners proceeded to 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
JHS
Completion Rate
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Percentage of Learners
under Independent 39% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70%
Reader-English
Percentage of Learners
under Independent 39% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70%
Reader-Filipino
Percentage of Learners
under Instructional 25% 37% 35% 30% 28% 25% 20%
Level-English
Percentage of Learners
under Instructional 34 % 37% 35% 30% 28% 25% 20%
Level-Filipino
Percentage of Learners
under Frustration 34 % 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 0%
Level-English
Percentage of Learners
under Frustration 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 2% 0%
Level-Filipino
Percentage of Learners
who are Non-reader- 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
English
Percentage of Learners
who are Non-reader- 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Filipino
The forecast Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) on GOVERNANCE for the next six years
based on the baseline in SY 2021-2022 are as follows:
1. Classroom to learners’ ratio: The ratio of classrooms to learners is expected to improve
from 1:19 in the baseline year to 1:15 by 2025 and remain constant at 1:15 until 2028. This
indicates a positive trend in reducing classroom overcrowding and ensuring sufficient space
for learners.
2. Teachers to Learners Ratio: The ratio of teachers to learners is forecasted to improve
from 1:19 in the baseline year to 1:15 by 2025 and remain consistent at 1:15 until 2028. This
suggests an enhancement in teacher-student interactions and personalized attention to
learners.
3. Textbooks to Learners Ratio: The ratio of textbooks to learners is projected to improve
from 1:
Y1 Y2 Y3
[email protected]
SIO # 1.3 20 100% 100% 100% Project IMES: MOOE April 2023 Zero (0)
Provide All SARDOS SARDOS SADOS - Enroll in ADM Inclusive to July SARDOS
individuals
opportunities learners will return will will Program Modular 2024
were in school return in return in
transition Education for
to all identified school school - Orientation of ADM
to the next SARDO. July 2024
July 2025
Monitoring and
Evaluation of the
Program
Priorities that the schools shall focus to address key and immediate challenges and
69
School- SIO # 2. 1 A total of 50% of 75% of 100% of Improve Project: MOOE August
aged All school- 285 were the 285 the 285 the program Oplan 2022 to
[email protected]
age children identified out-of- out-of- identified manageme Balik July
children and and youth, as Out of school school out-of- nt and Eskwel 2025
youth, and and adults in School youth enroll in school service a
adults in situations of Youth
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
70
School-aged SIO # 2. 1 Lack of At least 5 At least 8 Zero Promoting Project MOOE August Capacity to
children and All school- capacity out of 10 out of 10 records of assistance HOSTS: 2022 to address the
youth, and age children to NLPA NLPA NLPA program Helping July needs of
and youth, learners learners learners One 2025 identified
adults in address Seeking
[email protected]
and adults in
situations of the will will partnership Student disadvantaged
situations of All enrollees
disadvantage disadvantage needs of engage in engage in for the to learners
benefited are those school school are to finish provision of Succeed specifically
JHS and learners’
from who are activities, activities, those who are
[email protected]
youth, of delivery in situations Succeed dropping and
and disadvanta of out adults in
adults in ge Promoting disadvanta situations
situations benefited assistance ge are Communit of
of from program participatin y disadvant
Adopt a
child
program:
Tap
stakehold
ers who
can
74
ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
b. Enclosure F:
Annual Improvement Plan
School Year 2023-2024
Instruction: List down the activities that are required in each school year to
implement the school improvement projects. Indicated for every activity are
the schedule and venue, budget, and the person (s) responsible.
Outpu Person(
Schedul
Project t for s) Budget per Budget
Activities e/
Objective the Respon activity Source
Venue
Year sible
V. SCHOOL MONITORING
AND EVALUATION AND
ADJUSTMENTS
Indicator
Phase Phase
01 02
(2022- (2026-
2023 2030)
Intermediate Outcome (IO) #1 All school-age children, out–of–school youth, and adults assessed relevant
basic learning opportunities
Formula:
Enrollment (12-15)
__________________ x 100
Population (12-15)
Results Baseline Physical Target Means of Frequency Responsible M&E
Statement/ (SY Verification of Data Body Strategy
Key Performance 2019- Collection
Indicator 2020)
Phase Phase
01 02
(2022- (2026-
2023 2030)
Intermediate Outcome (IO) #1 All school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults assessed relevant
basic learning opportunities
2. Incidence of OOSC and OSYoOOSC & OSY
Junior HS
Senior HS
101. 1 All 5-year-old children in school
3. Percentage of
five-year-olds in
school (Net Intake
Rate
IO1.2 - All learners will stay in school and finish key stages
4. Percentage of enrollees (Elem, JHS, SHS) in a given school year who continue to be in school the
following school
year- Retention Rate
Junior HS 0% 0% 0% EBIES Annually SPT SBOE
Senior HS
Formula: Secondary
All indicators of the BEDP will be disaggregated by gender, learners in the situation of disadvantage,
regions, provinces, and types of schools, whenever possible
Enabling Mechanism #3. Investment in basic education provides learners with the ideal
learning environment.
3. Proportion of Schools achieving ideal Ratio on:
Classroom
Teachers
Textbooks
Seats
Science
and Math
Equipment
ICT
package
/E-
classroom
4. Proportion of secondary schools with:
Functional 100% of 100%
Library schools
with
electricit
y
Connection 100%
to
Electricity
Connection
to Internet
Functional
library
5. Proportion of SDOs achieving ideal interquartile ratio (IQR) *on teacher deployment
% SDOs
achieving
ideal
interquartile
retio (IQR)
Enabling Mechanism #4. Improve and modernize internal systems and processes for a
responsive and efficient financial resource management.
6. client satisfactory Rating of DEPED offices’ respective stakeholders (internal and
External)
School
OPPORTUNITY REGISTRY
Declared Process Opportunity OPPORTUNITY
and Opportunity Rating PURSUIT
Statement (Include ACTION PLAN PERSON/OFFICE TARGET
No. Likelihood Impact
benefit once an (may refer to other RESPONSIBLE DATE
opportunity is Likelihood x planning
encountered) Impact documents)
Teacher,
Good
Learners and
Covered Education in a All year
1. 5 5 25 School Head,
Pathway Beautiful round
Project
School
Coordinator
- Project IMES:
Inclusive School Head, August
Decrease
3. 5 5 25 Modular Advisers, Subject 22,
SARDOS Rate
Education for Teachers 2022
SARDOS
- SA
PAGBASA,
BUHAY AY
GIGINHAWA Teachers, School
Increase (A Reading Head, Advisers, All year
4. 5 5 25
Literacy Skills Program for Parents, and round
Struggling Teachers
Readers
and Non-
Readers)
Teachers,
Parents, School
Completion of Head, Batch All year
5. 5 5 25
Concrete Fence Representatives, round
School Head,
and Coordinator
School Head,
Lighting around Project In-
Project All year
6. the school 5 5 25 charge, PTA,
SOLAR round
campus Alumni
Association
Teachers, School
Head and
Gulayan sa All year
8. 5 5 25 Gulayan sa
Paaralan round
Paaralan
Coordinator
Teacher-In
Enhance NFOT Festival of charge, School All year
9. 5 5 25
Skills Talents Head, students, round
and participants.
Teachers, School
CLEAN AND
Waste Head, and Whole
10. 5 5 25 GREEN
Management Parents, Yes-O year
Program
Coordinator
Campus
Journalism
skills Program Head,
Enhance All year
11. 5 5 25 enhancement School Head,
Journalism round
through and Members
intensive
training
Program Head,
Strengthen Career All year
12. 5 5 25 School Head,
SHS Immersion Guidance round
and students
JHS research
Intensify Action coordinator, All year
13. 5 5 25
Research Teachers, and round
School Head
All teachers,
Guidance
Conduct Designate, Whole
14. Symposium on 5 5 25 School Head, year
mental health RHU personnel round
and District
Nurse
Feeding
August
Program and Clinic Teachers
15. Malnourishment 5 5 25 22,
ZUMBA BIDA (JHS & SHS)
2022
sa KNAHS
Advisers, WINS
Coordinator, All
WINS
16. 5 5 25 Teachers, School Year
PROGRAM
head and round
students
DRRM Whole
Ligtas and
17. DRRM 5 5 25 Coordinator and year
may alm
Team round