ACC Untuk Perawatan Dibahas Alat Lepasannya Saja - Deep Bite - Literature 2
ACC Untuk Perawatan Dibahas Alat Lepasannya Saja - Deep Bite - Literature 2
ACC Untuk Perawatan Dibahas Alat Lepasannya Saja - Deep Bite - Literature 2
140 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
142 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
around the incisors. Periodontal disease should be Herschleb in 1981 suggested use of 80-100 gram of
under control in adult patients before the start of force for four incisor intrusion. Nicolai14 in 1985
orthodontic treatment. advocated that intrusive force should be 60 gram/cm2
5) STABILITY11 of occlusoapical projection of root surface area.
Stability of attained results should be prime concern Kesling15,16 in 1985 suggested 14 gram of net force
in correction of deep bite. In children, often the for six upper anterior intrusion 35 gram for lower six
growth acts as a major catalyst in taking care of anteriors. Proffit3 in 1993 suggested 15 gram of force
extrusive side effects. In adults, adaptation of the needed for incisor intrusion. Siatkowski in 1997,
muscles, vertical dimension, and TMJ is difficult. The based on the work of Dermaut suggested 10-15 gram
treatment option in adults should be limited to teeth for upper central incisor where as 5-10 gram for
whenever possible. Intrusion of teeth can be upper lateral and 15-25 gram for upper canines.
accomplished without any change in skeletal and Karanth and Shetty17 in 2001 advocated 60 gram of
muscular components of the face. force for four upper incisors and 100 gram of force
6) OCCLUSAL PLANE11 for six anteriors; where as 40 gram of force for lower
This objective, if not considered along with lip and four incisors and 80 gram for six lower incisors.
vertical facial height considerations may result in Thus the force ranges on an average from 15 - 20 gm
unpleasant and unstable conditions in deep bite for each upper incisor and 10 - 15 gm for each lower
cases. incisor.
7) INTEROCCLUSAL SPACE11
But in adults the forces are to be applied carefully
The correction of a deep overbite by extruding
and somewhat towards a lower range.
posterior teeth to encroach on this space should be
avoided as it often results in relapse caused by the TREATMENT MODALITIES:
muscles of mastication and because of full occlusal A. CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH REMOVABLE
contact of posterior teeth during speech and APPLIANCES
mastication. It is also believed that this may also
result in pathologic changes at the 1) Bite plane or bite plate
temporomandibular joint. Used in 1879 by Miller,4 it permits the elongation of
8) TREATMENT TIME AND AGE OF PATIENT11 posterior teeth which depends on the growth of
In adult patients showing excessive deep bite with alveolar bone. This new bone must be conditioned to
accompanying high smile line, decreased vertical withstand the stresses of mastication by withdrawal
facial height and alveolar problems, the length of of bite plate gradually.
treatment may be very long. In these instances, the 2) Sved Bite Plane
patient should be given a choice for an orthognathic
correction of problem. In these patients, the Sved4,18 modified the bite plate to attempt to obtain
treatment plan to correct the excessive overbite some depression of the maxillary anterior teeth as
should be done in conjunction with oral and well as the mandibular anterior teeth. He has covered
maxillofacial surgeons. acrylic on the entire palatal and incisal surfaces and
extended up one third of the labial surfaces of the
OPTIMAL INTRUSIVE FORCE FOR ANTERIOR anterior teeth
INTRUSION 3) Posterior tongue crib19
Burstone12 in 1977, suggested 50 gram of intrusive Lateral tongue thrust or lateral positioning of the
force for upper central incisors, 100 gram force for tongue during function causes deep bite due to
centrals and laterals and 200 gram for six upper infraocclusion of molars. This true deep bite is called
anteriors. He advocated use of 40 gram for four lower as functional deep bite as the tongue is positioned on
incisors and 60 gram for all six lower anterior the occlusal surfaces during function.
intrusion. Bench, Gugino and Hilgers13 in 1978, 4) An Essix intrusion appliance20
advocated the intrusive force of 15 to 20 gram per An Essix appliance does not require clasps; it is easily
lower incisor or 60 to 80 gram for all four lower constructed, and can be thermoformed from a single
incisors. Ricketts in 1980 advocated the use of 125 1mm sheet of Essix plastic.
gram to 160 gram of force for upper incisor intrusion
and 60 to 75 gram for lower incisors. Liu and
143 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
side of molar band along with a lingual button which bends. These bends placed 3 mm mesial to the molar
is welded. Acessory slot is used to prepare a bite tube, tend to cause more intrusion of the upper
raiser. One end of 0.036” Stainless steel wire is canines and progressively less intrusion of the lateral
inserted 3-4 mm into the tube from the mesial side and central incisors due to bowing of the arch wire in
and the other end of the wire is inserted from the canine area.
distal side. The section of wire between the two ends b) Gable bend
is adapted to the occlusal morphology of the tooth. A Gable bends placed distal to the canines, normally
bend in the lingual portion of the wire is ligated to a made in the third stage archwire to maintain bite
welded lingual button on the maxillary tooth. The opening attained in the earlier stages. It tends to
ligature wire can be cut to allow the occlusion to be cause relative extrusion of canines, while there is
checked without removing the entire auxiliary. The progressively more intrusion of the lateral and central
ends of the bite raiser hinge on the molar tube. incisors. This has a more intrusive effect on central
Recently however, Richard Ceen29 has introduced a and lateral incisors.
prefabricated version of temporary bite raiser. c) Hocevar’s modification
The bite raiser has several advantages over existing In the Hocevar’s modification a bend on either side of
techniques. the canines are given. With this modification, the
central incisors are subjected to intrusion while the
It can be placed or removed easily and quickly
canine and lateral incisors are extruded (canine more
with minimum patient discomfort.
than lateral incisor) with respect to the central
The patient’s bite relationship can be assessed
incisors.
by hinging the device out of occlusion.
No laboratory procedures are required. d) Kameda’s modification16
Increased patient acceptance. Using a simultaneous anchor and gable bends, the
The stainless steel appliance is adjustable and canines and the premolars if engaged are extruded,
designed for use with either occlusally or gingivally while the lateral and centrals experience
placed headgear tubes. progressively more intrusive effect. Thus the bite
C.2) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH BEGG’S opening takes place by extrusion of posteriors and
TECHNIQUE15,16 intrusion of anteriors.
Deep overbites are eliminated and overcorrected in e) Dr. Jayade’s modification16
the first stage of Begg’s technique. A mild gingival curve is incorporated in the anterior
section, starting from mesial one cuspid circle to the
I) Arch wires15,16 corresponding point on the other side. This should lift
According to Kesling 0.016” arch wires are better for the archwire at the midpoint by about 3mm over the
opening the bite by elevating the mesial marginal brackets.
ridges of anchor molars which tends to relapse after He further augmented the intrusive action of the
active treatment. gingival curve by incorporating a vertical step-up
Mollenhauer suggests the use of 0.018” premium bend 4-5mm in height and placed 2 to 3mm mesial to
plus wire for upper anterior intrusion. This wire can the molar tube on both sides. Anchor (tip-back) bend
generate 75gm of force with an anchor bend of of the required degree is placed at the upper end of
approximately 50 degrees. However, the 0.18” arch the step. This results in uniform intrusion of all the six
wire producing such high magnitude of intrusive upper anterior teeth.
force can also severely tip the anchor molars distally III) Class II elastics
especially so, if there are no teeth present distal to
the anchor molars. The Class II intermaxillary elastics are applied at the
start of treatment. In the first stage of treatment
II) Bite opening bends15,16 these intermaxillary Class II elastics, by their force, tip
Many authors have proposed different sites for bite back the crowns of the six upper anteriors.
opening bends in the arch wires. A net intrusive force of 60gm can be obtained by a
combination of 75gm archwire generated intrusive
a) Anchor bend or conventional bite opening bends
force and appropriate modifications of Class II elastics
Earlier these bends were called as tip back bends. Dr.
as follow: -
Kesling has appropriately named them as anchor
145 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
a) By using light elastic force for longer periods 6) Band or bracket second molars as early as
(from 2 to 5 days). Elastics if not changed for 5 days possible.
exert a very light Class II force, most of the time, since 7) Use Class II elastics selectively.
the elastic force diminishes rapidly in the oral 8) Do not hurry final leveling of the archwires, use
environment. Such low force values do not adversely flat rectangular archwires at first, and then bite
affect concomitant retraction, because forces as light opening curves as needed.
as 5gm are known to be capable of achieving tipping 9) Use gentle forces for space closure in extraction
movements in the Begg technique. cases.
b) Sims has suggested the use of 3/8” ultra light
C.5) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH SEGMENTED
elastics instead of routinely used 5/16” light elastics.
ARCH TECHINQUE12
He suggested continuing the same elastics for 4-5
days, till they break. There are six major principles governing deep
C.3) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH EDGEWISE overbite correction by intrusion with a segmented
TECHNIQUE30 arch technique.
1) Use of optimal magnitude of force and the
I) Intrusion of individual teeth
delivery of this force constantly with low-load
For intrusion of a tooth, the segment of arch wire is deflection rate springs.
made to lie gingivally to the bracket groove. When 2) Use of point contact in the anterior region.
forced into place it exerts an intrusive force on the 3) Position of the force – careful selection of the
tooth. point of force application with respect to the center
of resistance of all the teeth to be intruded.
II) Mass movements
4) Selective intrusion based on anterior tooth
Using remaining teeth in the arch as anchors, it is geometry.
possible to depress the incisors or bicuspids as a unit, 5) Control over the reactive units by formation of a
but it will require the entire arch to depress one posterior anchorage unit.
canine or one molar. The reaction to depress teeth 6) Inhibition of eruption of posterior teeth and
with the archwire is often dissipated by the occlusion, avoidance of undesirable eruptive mechanics.
which can prevent the eruption of anchor teeth. This The basic mechanism for intrusion consists of three
type of bend is commonly referred as a step bend. parts.
Thus, a step bend that will raise or lower a contact 1) A posterior anchorage unit,
point relation is a bend that changes the level of the 2) An anterior segment and
archwire. 3) An intrusive arch spring.
Supra erupted anterior teeth may also be depressed
A) THREE-PIECE INTRUSION ARCH31,32
by ligation to a straight arch wire that lies gingivally
to their brackets. A three-piece base arch is used to intrude the
anterior segment. A heavy stainless steel segment
C.4) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH PREADJUSTED
(0.018” x 0.025”) with distal extensions below the
EDGEWISE TECHNIQUE (STRAIGHT WIRE APPLIANCE)
center of resistance of anterior teeth is placed
Deep overbites can be effectively controlled with passively in the anterior brackets. The distal
preadjusted appliances when the following principles extensions end 2 to 3 mm distal to the center of
are observed. resistance of the anterior segment.
1) Avoid extractions in low angle cases whenever The intrusive force is applied with a 0.017” x 0.025”
possible. TMA tip-back springs. The overall force system
2) Use 0.022” slots with 0.019” x 0.25” working obtained is an intrusive force anterior and an
archwires and 0.018” slots with 0.017” x 0.25” extrusive force posterior associated with the tip back
working archwires. moment. The design of this appliance enables low-
3) Use anterior bite plates at the beginning of friction sliding to occur along the distal extension of
treatment in moderate to low angle cases. the anterior segment during space closure.
4) Use light initial forces to avoid deepening the
The application of light, distal force delivered by a
bite.
class I elastic to the anterior segment is used to alter
5) Avoid elastic retraction of cuspid brackets.
the direction of the intrusive force on the anterior
146 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
segment. This appliance design allows the application The tip back produces light intrusive forces on the
of the intrusive force to get true intrusion of the incisors. In cases of growing patients the intrusive
incisors along their long axis. force should be light to hold the incisors at their
B) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH UTILITY positions. In adult patients with deep bite, heavier
ARCHES intrusive force is used for intrusion of the anteriors.
Late in the 1950’s Robert Ricketts13 gave the utility C.6) KALRA SIMULTANEOUS INTRUSION AND
arch mechanics for the intrusion of lower incisors RETRACTION
which has shown clinically that the four lower incisors The K-SIR (Kalra simultaneous Intrusion and
can be intruded very efficiently with forces of 15 to Retraction) archwire given by Varun Kalra34 is a
20 gram per lower incisor or 60 to 80 gram for all four modification of the segmented loop mechanics of
lower incisor teeth. The upper incisors have a root Burstone. It is a continuous 0.019” x 0.025” TMA
surface cross section that is almost twice as large as archwire with closed 7mm x 2mm U – loops at the
the lower incisors and, therefore the force required extraction sites.
for their intrusions is twice as much as the lower To obtain bodily movement and prevent tipping of
arch, approximately 160 gram or 40 gram per each the teeth into the extraction spaces, a 900 V- bend is
tooth. placed in the archwire at the level of each U – loop.
This V – bend, when centered between the first molar
The mandibular utility arch is best fabricated from
and canine during space closure, creates two equal
0.016 x 0.016 Blue Elgiloy wire to deliver a continuous
and opposite moments to counter the moments
force to the lower incisors. The design of the
caused by the activation forces of the closing loops.
mandibular utility arch is dictated by the requirement
A 600 V- bend located posterior to the center of the
that this light force be delivered in a continuous
interbracket distance produces an increased
manner of a long lever arm from the molar to the
clockwise moment on the first molar, which
incisors.
augments molar anchorage as well as the intrusion of
The maxillary utility arch takes approximately double
the anterior teeth.
the force to intrude the upper incisors, compared to
To prevent the buccal segments from rolling
the lower incisors, approximately 125 – 160 grams.
mesiolingually due to force produced by the loop
This is one of the reasons for using the 0.016 x 0.022”
activation, a 200 antirotation bend is placed in the
blue Elgiloy or Nitinol maxillary utility arch in the
archwire just distal to each U – loop.
initial phase of treatment. The second reason is that
the span between the upper molars and the incisors C.7) THE CONNECTICUT INTRUSION ARCH
is a greater distance and, therefore, decreases the
The Connecticut intrusion arch (CTA) given by
force delivered to the maxillary incisors.
Ravindra Nanda35 is fabricated from a nickel titanium
The use of the 0.016 x 0.022” utility arch in order to alloy to provide the advantages of shape memory,
create the added force needed to intrude the spring back and light continuous force distribution
maxillary incisors has an adverse tipping effect on the (Image 17). It incorporates the characteristics of the
maxillary molars. It therefore, becomes necessary to utility arch as well as those of the conventional
stabilize the molars. The use of Quad-Helix, lingual intrusion arch. The CTA is preformed with the
arch, or transpalatal arch will help in stabilizing the appropriate bends necessary for easy insertion and
maxillary molars. use.
C) MULLIGAN’S INTRUSION ARCH Two wire sizes are available: 0.016” x 0.022” and
0.017” x 0.025”. The maxillary and mandibular
Mulligan’s33 intrusion arch is used for incisor
versions have anterior dimensions of 34 mm and 25
intrusion and molar extrusion in deep bite cases. The
mm, respectively
archwire used is round 0.016” stainless steel. The
C.8) BITE OPENING AND SPACE CLOSING ARCHWIRE
bracket slot is 0.022 x 0.025”. All brackets are leveled
This arch wire is given by Leonard Bernstein.36 The
and uprighted with initial wires. Then the 0.016”
purpose of this archwire is to provide an upward and
round stainless steel wire is placed in the setup. Arch
backward force in an arc-shaped motion to the
wire is tightly cinched back distal to the molars. The
maxillary central and lateral incisors with retraction
tipback bends or ‘V’ bend given to the arch wire for
force at the same time. By keeping a distal closing
intrusive action on incisors and extrusive action on
force on these teeth, the upward and backward force
molars.
producing bite opening seems to be enhanced.
147 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
0.018” x slot bracket with wires of 0.016, 0.018 and It is much more difficult to permanently increase
0.016 x 0.022 gauge are most commonly used. anterior face height by rotating the mandible at the
C.9) EQUIPLAN – QUAD HELIX COMBINATION condyles than it is to rotate it within the body-ramus
Dr. J. M. S. Pato37 developed the appliance in 1992 by region via a ramus osteotomy. The first approach
attaching a planas equiplan to a quad helix or a requires lengthening of elevator muscles because
transpalatal bar. The palatal expander is inserted into ramus osteotomy allows the muscles to shorten as
the lingual tubes of the first molar bands or welded the chin goes down but the gonial angles go up.
directly to the molar bands. The planas equiplan is Relapse of overbite correction following mandibular
attached to the anterior arms with acrylic or directly subapical advancement also is likely to occur, due to
to the anterior helices of the Quad helix. strong musculature in short face patients. One reason
It can be used successfully in patients of any age with for considering mandibular subapical advancement
dental deep bite, in growing patients with skeletal rather than a ramus osteotomy is the tendency for
deep bite. Its main advantage is that the fixed Quad these patients to have a prominent chin relative to
Helix expands the palate at the same time that the their dentition. If face height is only slightly short and
occlusal plane is unlocked to allow uninterrupted overbite is not a major problem the subapical
orthodontic movements. osteotomy may be an ideal solution, but if significant
C.10) A LINGUAL ARCH FOR INTRUDING AND vertical change is needed, a ramus osteotomy is
UPRIGNTING LOWER INCISORS38 needed.
A simple lingual arch with elastomeric chain attached The surgical treatment options56 in deep bite patients
to lingual buttons on the incisors overcomes the are
problems of both sectional and full arches by creating 1. Orthodontics and interpositional genioplasty
equal downward force vectors that pass behind the 2. Orthodontics and Inferior onlay mandibuloplasty
centers of resistance of all four incisors. 3. Orthodontics and mandibular advancement
Four elastic chains are attached to the anterior bridge 4. Orthodontics and total subapical mandibular
of the lingual arch with the mosquito forceps. If advancement
intrusion is primary goal and the teeth are already 5. Orthodontics and inferior repositioning of
fairly upright, the elastic chains should come off the maxilla and mandibular advancement
lingual arch on the labial side. 6. Orthodontics and combined maxillary and
C.11) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH MINI SCREW mandibular surgery
ANCHORAGE SYSTEM39
REFERENCES:
To intrude the upper incisors, the best placement of 1. Graber T.M., Swain B.E. Orthodontics: Current
mini-screw is between the upper lateral incisors and Principles and Techniques, St. Louis: Mosby Co; 1985.
rd
the canines. The placement of the mini-screws should 2. Graber T.M. Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. 3
be done after leveling and alignment, in order to Ed., W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
3. Proffit W.R., Field H.W., Ackerman J. L., Bailey L.T.,
maximize the interradicular space at the placement rd
Tulloch J.F.C. Contemporary Orthodontics 3 , C.V.
site. In order to avoid tipping the upper incisors Mosby Co; 2000.
buccally during the intrusion, the end of the arch wire 4. Geiger A, Hirshfeld L. Minor tooth movements in
is cinched back. rd
general practice 3 Ed. Mosby Co.
C.12) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH MAGNETS40 5. Nielsen I.L. Vertical malocclusion, etiology,
Samarium cobalt magnets of attracting type extrude development, diagnosis and some aspect of
posterior segments with average 120 grams of fore. treatment. Angle Orthod 1991, 4; 247-260.
C.13) CORRECTION OF DEEP BITE WITH 6. Bell W.H., Proffit W.R., White R.P. Surgical correction
ORTHODONTICS AND SURGERY41 of dentofacial deformities. W.B. Saunders Co.
Philadelphia, 1980.
In patients with very short face height, upward and 7. Athanasiou A.E. Orthodontic Cephalometry. Mosby –
forward rotation of the chin may partially or even Wolfe.
totally conceal their mandibular deficiency. These 8. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types.
patients may need to have their chin moved straight Am. J. Orthod. 1969; 55: 109-123.
down even so, advancement of mandible is needed 9. Sassouni V. Orthodontics in dental practice. The C.V.
otherwise, the chin would inevitably go backward as Msby Co. 1971.
10. Salzmann. J.A. Practice of Orthodontics. J.B.
is moved downward because the mandible would
Lippincott Co. Philadelphia 1957.
rotate on an arc.
148 | Page
Dr. Priti Shukla et al. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies (IJMBS)
11. Nanda R. Correction of deep overbite in adults. 24. Northcutt M.E. The bite Plate Nance appliance J Clin.
DCNA1997; 41: 67-87. Orthod 1995; 29(12):760 – 761
12. Burstone C.R. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. 25. Philippe J. Treatment of deep bite with bonded bite
Am. J. Orthod 1977; 72: 1-22. planes J Clin. Orthod 1996; 30: 396 – 400.
13. Bench R.W., Gugino C.F., Hilgers J.J. Biopragressive 26. Madsen R. Bonded acrylic lingual bite planes J Clin.
therapy. Orthod 1998; 35 (5): 311- 317
Part 2 – Principles of Bioprogressive therapy. J. Clin. 27. Fine H.A. A fixed labial / lingual technique for rapid
Orthod. 1977; 11 (10): 661-682. bite opening. J Clin. Orthod 1991; 25 (10) : 606 – 607.
Part 7 – The utility arches and sectional arches in 28. Guray E. Temporary bite raiser J Clin. Orthod 1999; 33
Bioprogressive therapy mechanics. J. Clin. Orthod (4): 206 – 208
1978; 12 (3): 192 – 207. 29. Ceen R.B. Bite Opening with the Guray bite raiser. J
Part 10 – Mechanics sequence for class II dinvision 1 cases Clin. Orthod 2002 36 (11): 639-641
J. Clin. Orthod 1978; 12 (6): 427 – 439. 30. Renfroe E.W. Edgewise technique. Lea and Febiger
Part 11 – Mechanic Sequence for class II dinvision 2 cases J. Philadelphia – 1975
Clin. Orthod 1978; 12 (7): 505 – 521. 31. Shroff B. Yoon W.M. Lindauer S. J., Burstone C.J.
14. Nikolai R.J. Bioengineering Analyses of Orthodontic Simultaneous intrusion and retraction using a three
Mechanics; Lea and Febinger, Philadelphia 1985. piece base arch Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 455 – 461.
15. Begg P.R., Kesling P.C. Begg Orthodontic therapy and 32. Shroff B., Lindauer S. J., Burstone C.J. Segmented
rd
technique 3 Ed. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia. approach to simultaneous intrusion and space
st
16. Jayade V.P. Refined Begg’s for Modern Times 1 Ed. closure. Am. J Orthod 1995; 107: 136 – 143.
Publisher: Mrs. Anuradha V. jayade,Hubli, Karnataka 33. Mulligan.Common sense mechanics Part – 12 J. Clin.
State, India. Orthod 1980;14(8): 546-553.
17. Divakar H.S. Shetty S. Comparative study of various 34. Kalra V.Simultaneous intrusion and retraction of the
intrusive arches J. Ind. Orthod Soc. 2001; 34: 82 – 91 Anterior teeth J. Clin Orthod 1998; 35 (9): 535-540
18. Walther D.P. Current Orthodontics eight Teachers, 35. Nanda R., Marzban R., Kuhlberg A. The connecticut
Bristol: John Wright and Sonsltd 1966. Intrusion Arch J. Clin. Orthod 1998; 35 (12): 708-715
19. Graber T.M., Rakosi T, Petrovic G. Dentofacial 36. Bernstein L. A bite opening and space closing
Orthopedics with functional Appliances; St. Louis, archwire J. Clin. Orthod 1970; 4 (11): 649-654
Mosby Co. 1985. 37. Pato J.M.S., Saboia S.V.M., Pato B.J.M., Pato J.M.M.
20. Armbruster P, Sheridan J.J., Nguyen P. An Essix The Equiplan – Quad helix combination in deep bite
intrusion appliance J. Clin. Orthod 2003; 37 (8): 412 – cases. J. Clin. Orthod 2002; 36(8): 434 – 436.
422 38. Senior W. A lingual arch for intruding and uprighting
21. Graber T.M., Neuman B. Removable orthodontic lower incisors. J. Clin. Orthod 2003; 37(6): 302-306.
nd
appliances, 2 Ed., W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia 39. Carano A., Velo S., Incorvatic, Poggio P. Mini – Screw
1984 – Anchorage – System in the maxillary alveolar bone
22. Bhalaji S.I. Orthodontics: The art and science. Arya J. Ind. Orthod Soc. 2004; 37: 74-84.
publishing house, New Delhi. 40. Blechman A.M. Magnetic force systems in
23. Clark W.J. Twin block Functional therapy, aplication in orthodontics Am. J. Orthod 1985; 87: 201-210.
dentofacial Orthopaedics Mosby – Wolfe 1995. 41. Proffit W.R., White R.P. Surgical orthodontic
treatment. Mosby 1990.
149 | Page