T23 Frameworks
T23 Frameworks
Copyright © 2021
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
tel: +1-617-552-1600
e-mail: [email protected]
timssandpirls.bc.edu
CHAPTER 1
TIMSS 2023 Mathematics Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Ray Philpot, Mary Lindquist, Ina V.S. Mullis, Charlotte E.A. Aldrich
CHAPTER 2
TIMSS 2023 Science Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Victoria A.S. Centurino, Dana L. Kelly
CHAPTER 3
TIMSS 2023 Context Questionnaire Framework. . . . . . . . . 46
Katherine A. Reynolds, Ina V.S. Mullis, Michael O. Martin
CHAPTER 4
TIMSS 2023 Assessment Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Liqun Yin, Pierre Foy
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Introduction
Ina V.S. Mullis
Michael O. Martin
Matthias von Davier
2 Mullis, I.V.S. & Martin, M.O. (2022). IEA’s TIMSS and PIRLS: Measuring long-term trends in student
achievement. In T. Nilsen, A. Stancel-Pitątak, & J. Gustafsson (Eds.), International handbook of comparative
large-scale studies in education: perspectives, methods, and findings. Springer, forthcoming.
3 Mullis, I.V.S. & Martin, M.O. (2022). IEA’s TIMSS and PIRLS: Measuring long-term trends in student
achievement. In T. Nilsen, A. Stancel-Pitątak, & J. Gustafsson (Eds.), International handbook of comparative
large-scale studies in education: perspectives, methods, and findings. Springer, forthcoming.
4 Kelly, D.L., Centurino, V.A.S., Martin, M.O., & Mullis, I.V.S. (2020). TIMSS 2019 encyclopedia: Education policy
and curriculum in mathematics and science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study
Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/encyclopedia/
Overview
All children can benefit from developing an understanding of mathematics and facility with the
mathematics needed in today’s technological world. Mathematics is essential in daily life as well as in
many career fields such as engineering, architecture, accounting, banking, business, medicine, ecology,
and aerospace. Mathematics is vital to economics and finance, as well as to computing technology and
software development. The ability to learn new skills and to solve problems is paramount in today’s
changing world.
This chapter presents the assessment frameworks for the two TIMSS 2023 mathematics assessments:
• TIMSS Mathematics—Fourth Grade
• TIMSS Mathematics—Eighth Grade
As described in the Introduction, the TIMSS 2023 Mathematics Framework for the fourth and eighth
grades builds on TIMSS’s 28-year history of assessments every four years since 1995, with this being the
eighth assessment in the series.
In general, the fourth and eighth grade frameworks are similar to those used in TIMSS 2019. Minor
updates reflect the curricula, standards, and frameworks of the participating countries as reported in
the TIMSS 2019 Encyclopedia1 and suggestions from the TIMSS 2023 National Research Coordinators.
Fourth Grade
Content Domains Percentages
Number 50%
Data 20%
Eighth Grade
Content Domains Percentages
Number 30%
Algebra 30%
The content domains differ for the fourth and eighth grades, reflecting the mathematics widely
taught at each grade. There is more emphasis on number at the fourth grade than at the eighth grade.
Algebra becomes a topic of its own in eighth grade, whereas the introductory algebraic topics assessed
at the fourth grade are included in the number topic area. The eighth grade geometry domain includes
measurement but also a deeper inclusion of purely geometric topics. The fourth grade data domain
focuses on reading, representing, and interpreting data, whereas at the eighth grade it includes more
emphasis on drawing conclusions from data, basic statistics, and the fundamentals of probability.
It is important to highlight that TIMSS assesses a range of situations within mathematics, with
well over half (60-65%) the items requiring students to use applying and reasoning skills. The cognitive
domains are the same for both grades, but with less emphasis in the eighth grade on the knowing domain
and greater emphasis on the reasoning domain.
Following this brief introduction, the chapter begins with the fourth grade content domains,
identifying the three main content domains and the assessment topics within each domain. Chapter 1
continues with the description of the eighth grade domains and calculator policy. The chapter ends with
the description of the cognitive domains for both grades.
Exhibit 1.2: Target Percentages of the TIMSS 2023 Mathematics Assessment Devoted to
Content Domains at the Fourth Grade
Data 20%
Each of the following topics within each content area can be assessed by items measuring the
knowing, applying, or reasoning cognitive domains as appropriate. Also, the items covering the topics
in a content domain are expected to be situated in a range of contexts. At least 15 percent should
be presented without context, and the remaining should range from straightforward problem solving
situations to the complex extended scenarios in the PSIs.
Number
Number provides the foundation of mathematics in primary school. The number content domain
consists of three topic areas. The 50 percent of the assessment devoted to number is apportioned as
follows:
• Whole numbers (25%)
• Expressions, simple equations, and relationships (15%)
• Fractions and decimals (10%)
Whole numbers are the predominant component of the number domain and students should be
able to compute with whole numbers of reasonable size. Introductory algebraic concepts also are part of
the TIMSS assessment at the fourth grade, including understanding the use of variables (unknowns) in
simple equations and initial understandings of relationships between quantities. However, because objects
and quantities often do not come in whole numbers, it is also important for students to understand
fractions and decimals. Students should be able to compare, add, and subtract familiar fractions and
decimals.
Whole Numbers
1. Recognize place value of numbers to 6 digits, connect representations of numbers (words,
symbols, and models including number lines), and compare numbers.
2. Add and subtract up to 4-digit numbers.
Data
The explosion of data in today’s information society has resulted in a variety of visual displays of
quantitative information. Often the internet, newspapers, magazines, textbooks, reference books, and
articles have data represented in charts, tables, and graphs. Students need to understand that graphs and
charts help organize information or categories and provide a way to compare data.
The data content domain consists of two topic areas:
• Reading and displaying data (10%)
• Interpreting, combining, and comparing data (10%)
At the fourth grade, students should be able to read and create data displays. They should be able
to make inferences from data displays and use data from one or more sources to answer questions of
interest.
Reading and Displaying Data
1. Read data from tables, pictographs, bar graphs, line graphs, and pie charts.
2. Create or complete tables, pictographs, bar graphs, line graphs, and pie charts.
Interpreting, Combining, and Comparing Data
1. Interpret data and use it to answer questions that go beyond directly reading data displays.
2. Combine or compare data from two or more sources, and draw conclusions based on two or
more data sets.
Exhibit 1.3: Target Percentages of the TIMSS 2023 Mathematics Assessment Devoted to
Content Domains at the Eighth Grade
Algebra 30%
As with fourth grade mathematics, each of the following topics within each content area at the
eighth grade can be assessed by items measuring the knowing, applying, or reasoning cognitive domains
as appropriate. Also, the items covering the topics in a content domain are expected to be situated in a
range of contexts. At least 15 percent should be presented without context, and the remaining should
range from straightforward problem solving situations to the complex extended scenarios in the PSIs.
Number
At the eighth grade, the 30 percent of the assessment devoted to number consists of three topic areas:
• Integers (10%)
• Fractions and decimals (10%)
• Proportions, ratios, and percentages (10%)
Building on the number content domain at the fourth grade, eighth grade students should have
developed proficiency with more advanced whole number concepts and procedures as well as extended
their mathematical understanding of rational numbers (integers, fractions, and decimals). Students
also should understand and be able to compute with integers. Fractions and decimals are an important
part of daily life and being able to compute with them requires an understanding of the quantities the
symbols represent. A single rational number can be represented with many different written symbols,
and students need to be able to recognize the distinctions among interpretations of rational numbers,
convert between them, and reason with them. Students should be able to apply ratios, proportions, and
percentages to whole number amounts.
Algebra
The 30 percent of the assessment devoted to algebra is comprised of two topic areas:
• Expressions, operations, and equations (20%)
• Relationships and functions (10%)
Patterns and relationships are pervasive in the world around us. Students should be able to use
algebraic models and express relationships algebraically. They need to be able to rearrange formulas
and substitute values into formulas. Their conceptual understanding can extend to linear equations for
calculations about quantities that change at constant rates. Linear and simple non-linear functions can
be used to describe what will happen to a variable when a related variable changes.
Expressions, Operations, and Equations
1. Find the value of an expression or a formula given values of the variables.
2. Simplify algebraic expressions involving sums, products, differences, and positive integer
powers; compare expressions to decide if they are equivalent.
3. Write expressions, equations, or inequalities to represent problem situations.
4. Solve linear equations, linear inequalities, and simultaneous linear equations in two variables,
including validating values as solutions.
Relationships and Functions
1. Interpret, relate, and generate representations of linear functions in tables, graphs, or words;
recognize properties of linear functions including slope and intercepts.
Exhibit 1.4: Target Percentages of the TIMSS 2023 Mathematics Assessment Devoted to Cognitive
Domains at the Fourth and Eighth Grades
The following sections describe the types of cognitive skills particular to each of the three cognitive
domains. Items are classified according to cognitive skills to ensure a range of coverage within each
cognitive domain. However, there are no specified targets for the percentages of score points for each
cognitive skill.
Knowing
Facility in applying mathematics, or reasoning about mathematical situations, depends on familiarity
with mathematical concepts and fluency in mathematical skills. The more relevant knowledge a student
is able to recall and the wider the range of concepts he or she understands, the greater the potential for
engaging with a wide range of problem situations.
Without access to a knowledge base that enables easy recall of the language and basic facts and
conventions of number, symbolic representation, and spatial relations, students would find purposeful
mathematical thinking impossible. Facts encompass the knowledge that provides the basic language of
mathematics, as well as the essential mathematical concepts and properties that form the foundation
for mathematical thought.
Procedures form the foundation of the mathematics needed for solving problems, especially those
encountered by many people in their daily lives. In essence, a fluent use of procedures entails recall of
sets of actions and how to carry them out. Students need to be efficient and accurate in using a variety
of computational procedures and tools in relatively familiar and routine tasks. They need to see that
particular procedures can be used to solve entire classes of problems, not just individual problems.
Applying
The applying domain involves the application of mathematics in a range of situations. Problem solving
is central to this domain. Students will need to select suitable operations, strategies, and tools for
solving problems. Many of the problems are set in real life situations, requiring students to formulate
the problem in mathematical terms before implementing a solution. In these problems, students need
to apply mathematical knowledge of facts, skills, and procedures or understanding of mathematical
concepts to create representations. Representation of ideas forms the core of mathematical thinking
and communication, and the ability to create representations is fundamental to success in the subject.
Other problems may be concerned with purely mathematical questions involving, for example,
numeric or algebraic expressions, functions, equations, geometric figures, or statistical data sets. With
these problems, a mathematical representation might be given and students might need to interpret the
representation or generate an equivalent representation in order to solve the problem.
Reasoning
Reasoning mathematically involves logical, systematic thinking. It includes intuitive and inductive
reasoning based on patterns and regularities that can be used to arrive at solutions to problems. Evidence
of reasoning processes can be found in the explaining or justifying of a solution method, or the making
of valid inferences on the basis of information and evidence. Reasoning is required in analyzing or
generalizing mathematical relationships.
Even though many of the cognitive skills listed in the reasoning domain may be drawn on
when thinking about and solving complex problems, each by itself represents a valuable outcome of
Overview
Innovations in technology and science constantly shape and reshape our daily life experiences: the
availability of clean water; the food we eat; the quality of the air we breathe; the vaccines, medicines, and
medical diagnostic tools available; the ways we communicate; the modes of transportation we use; and
more. Children in primary and lower-secondary grades today have lived all of their lives in a science-
and technology-enhanced world. Perhaps more than any previous generation, they have boundless
opportunities to engage in activities and experiences and with information that can satisfy their natural
curiosity about the world and their place in it. Science education in the primary grades capitalizes on
this curiosity and starts young students on a path of systematic inquiry about the world in which they
live. As their understanding of science develops, students in the lower-secondary grades are increasingly
able to make informed decisions about themselves and their world so that, as adults, they can become
informed and scientifically literate citizens capable of distinguishing scientific fact from fiction and
understanding the scientific basis of important social, economic, and environmental issues. Across the
world, there is an increased demand for those qualified to pursue the careers in science, technology,
and engineering to continue to drive the innovation necessary to solve global problems (e.g., mitigating
the environmental impacts of human activities, increasing access to clean water and nutritious food,
preparing next-generation medical therapies), grow economies, and improve quality of life. To meet this
demand, it is increasingly important to prepare students to enter advanced study in these areas.
This chapter presents the assessment framework for the two TIMSS 2023 science assessments:
• TIMSS Science—Fourth Grade
• TIMSS Science—Eighth Grade
The TIMSS 2023 Science Frameworks for the fourth and eighth grades extends the 28-year history
of TIMSS assessments, beginning in 1995 and taking place every four years since. TIMSS 2023 is the
eighth assessment in the series.
The TIMSS 2023 science frameworks are similar to those used in TIMSS 2019. However, there have
been minor updates to reflect countries’ evolving science curricula, frameworks, and learning goals as
reported in the TIMSS 2019 Encyclopedia.1 TIMSS 2023 completes the transition to digital assessment,
which began in TIMSS 2019. The science frameworks have been updated to reflect that TIMSS 2023 will
be developed in and for a digital environment, including capitalizing on innovative technology-based
Exhibit 2.1: Target Percentages of the TIMSS 2023 Science Assessment Devoted to Content and
Cognitive Domains at the Fourth and Eighth Grades
Fourth Grade
Content Domains Percentages
Life Science 45%
Physical Science 35%
Earth Science 20%
Eighth Grade
Content Domains Percentages
Biology 35%
Chemistry 20%
Physics 25%
Earth Science 20%
The content domains differ for the fourth and eighth grades, reflecting the nature and difficulty
of the science taught at each grade. There is more emphasis at the fourth grade on life science than its
counterpart, biology, at the eighth grade. At the eighth grade, physics and chemistry are assessed as
separate content domains and receive more emphasis than at fourth grade, where they are assessed as
one content domain (physical science). The Earth science content domain has the same level of emphasis
at both grades, but the objectives at the eighth grade are more sophisticated than at the fourth grade.
The three cognitive domains (knowing, applying, and reasoning) are the same at both grades,
encompassing the range of cognitive processes involved in learning science concepts, and then applying
these concepts and reasoning with them.
In 2023, TIMSS Science also will assess key science practices. These practices include skills from
daily life and school studies that students use in a systematic way to conduct scientific inquiry and
investigation and that are fundamental to all science disciplines. Increasing emphasis has been placed
on science practices and science inquiry in many countries’ current science curricula, standards, and
frameworks.2 Facility with science practices is essential for students to learn and understand science
concepts and to understand and appreciate the nature of science and scientific knowledge.
The practice of science is, by its very nature, strongly connected to the area of science under study
and, therefore, cannot be assessed in isolation. Some items in the TIMSS 2023 science assessment at
both the fourth and eighth grades will assess one or more of these important science practices together
with content specified in the content domains and thinking processes specified in the cognitive domains.
The science practices will primarily be assessed through the science PSIs, however. In the PSIs, students
conduct extended investigations and inquiries in a science content area and in doing so engage in one
or more of the science practices.
The next two sections of this chapter present the TIMSS 2023 science content domains for fourth
and eighth grades, followed by a description of the cognitive domains, which are applicable to both
grades. The chapter concludes with a description of the science practices.
Each of these content domains includes several major topic areas, and each topic area in turn
includes one or more topics. Each topic is further described by specific objectives that represent the
students’ expected knowledge, abilities, and skills assessed within each topic.
Across the fourth grade assessment, each objective receives approximately equal weight in terms
of the number of assessment items. The verbs used in the objectives are intended to represent typical
performances expected of fourth grade students, but are not intended to limit performances to a
particular cognitive domain. Each objective can be assessed drawing on any of the three cognitive
domains (knowing, applying, and reasoning). Some objectives include additional parenthetical
information. Illustrative examples appear after an “e.g.,” such as in “Relate major structures in animals
to their functions (e.g., bones support the body, lungs take in air, the heart circulates blood, the stomach
digests food, muscles move the body).” In some cases, the additional information indicates the scope of
the objective appropriate for fourth grade students and appears after an “i.e.,” such as in “Recognize that
matter can be changed from one state to another by heating or cooling; describe changes in the state of
water (i.e., melting, freezing, boiling, evaporation, and condensation).”
Life Science
The study of life science at the fourth grade provides students with an opportunity to capitalize on their
innate curiosity and begin to understand the living world around them. In TIMSS 2023, life science is
represented by five topic areas:
• Characteristics and life processes of organisms
• Life cycles, reproduction, and heredity
• Organisms, environment, and their interactions
• Ecosystems
• Human health
By the fourth grade, students are expected to be building a base of knowledge about general
characteristics of organisms, how they function, and how they interact with other organisms and with
their environment. Students also should be familiar with fundamental science concepts related to life
cycles, heredity, and human health that in later grades will lead to a more sophisticated understanding
of how the human body functions.
Ecosystems
1. Common ecosystems:
A. Relate common plants and animals (e.g., evergreen trees, frogs, lions) to common
ecosystems (e.g., forests, ponds, grasslands).
2. Relationships in simple food chains:
A. Recognize that plants need (sun)light, air, and water to provide energy for life processes
(i.e., growth and repair, movement, and reproduction); explain that animals eat plants or
other animals to get the food they need to supply energy for life processes (i.e., growth and
repair, movement, and reproduction).
B. Complete a model of a simple food chain using common plants and animals from
common ecosystems, (e.g., a forest, a desert, a river, an ocean).
C. Describe the roles of living things at each link in a simple food chain (e.g., plants produce
their own food; some animals eat plants, while other animals eat the animals that eat
plants).
D. Identify common predators and their prey and describe their relationships.
3. Competition in ecosystems:
A. Recognize and explain that some living things in an ecosystem compete with others for
resources (e.g., food, light, space).
E
Physical Science
At the fourth grade, students learn how many physical phenomena that they observe in their everyday
lives can be explained through an understanding of physical science concepts. The topic areas for the
physical science content domain at fourth grade are:
• Classification and properties of matter and changes in matter
• Forms of energy and energy transfer
• Forces and motion
Fourth grade students should have an understanding of physical states of matter (solid, liquid, and
gas), as well as common changes in the state and form of matter; this forms a foundation for the study
of both chemistry and physics in the middle and upper grades. At this level, students also should know
common forms and sources of energy and their practical uses, and understand basic concepts about light,
sound, electricity, and magnetism. The study of forces and motion emphasizes an understanding of forces
as they relate to movements students can observe, such as the effect of gravity or pushing and pulling.
Classification and Properties of Matter and Changes in Matter
1. States of matter and characteristic differences of each state:
A. Identify and describe three states of matter (i.e., a solid has a definite shape and volume, a
liquid has a definite volume but not a definite shape, and a gas has neither a definite shape
nor a definite volume).
2. Physical properties as a basis for classifying matter:
A. Compare and sort objects and materials on the basis of physical properties (e.g., weight/
mass, volume, state of matter, ability to conduct heat or electricity, ability to float or sink
in water, ability to be attracted by a magnet). [Note: Students in the fourth grade are not
expected to differentiate between mass and weight.]
B. Identify properties of metals (i.e., conducting electricity and conducting heat) and relate
these properties to uses of metals (e.g., a copper electrical wire, an iron cooking pot).
C. Describe examples of mixtures and how they can be physically separated (e.g., sifting,
filtration, evaporation, magnetic attraction).
Earth Science
Earth science is the study of Earth and its place in the Solar System, and at fourth grade focuses on the
study of phenomena and processes that students can observe in their everyday lives. While there is no
single picture of what constitutes an Earth science curriculum that applies to all countries, the three
topic areas included in this domain are generally considered to be important for students at the fourth
grade to understand as they learn about the planet on which they live and its place in the Solar System:
• Earth’s physical characteristics, resources, and history
• Earth’s weather and climates
• Earth in the Solar System
At this level, students should have some general knowledge about the structure and physical
characteristics of Earth’s surface, and about the use of Earth’s most important resources. Students also
should be able to describe some of Earth’s processes in terms of observable changes and understand the
time frame over which such changes have occurred. Fourth grade students should also demonstrate
some understanding about Earth’s place in the Solar System based on observations of patterns of change
on Earth and in the sky.
Earth’s Physical Characteristics, Resources, and History
1. Physical characteristics of the Earth system:
A. Recognize that Earth’s surface is made up of land and water in unequal proportions (more
water than land) and is surrounded by air; describe where fresh and salt water are found.
2. Earth’s resources:
A. Identify some of Earth’s resources that are used in everyday life (e.g., water, wind, soil,
forests, oil, natural gas, minerals).
B. Explain the importance of using Earth’s renewable and non-renewable resources
responsibly (e.g., fossil fuels, forests, water).
Exhibit 2.3: Target Percentages of the TIMSS 2023 Science Assessment Devoted to
Content Domains at the Eighth Grade
Each of these content domains includes several major topic areas, and each topic area in turn
includes one or more topics. Each topic is further described by specific objectives that represent the
students’ expected knowledge, abilities, and skills assessed within each topic. Across the eighth grade
assessment, each objective receives approximately equal weight in terms of assessment items. The verbs
used in the objectives are intended to represent typical performances expected of eighth grade students,
but are not intended to limit performances to a particular cognitive domain. Each objective can be
assessed drawing on each of the three cognitive domains (knowing, applying, and reasoning). Some
objectives include additional parenthetical information. Illustrative examples appear after an “e.g.,” such
as in “Locate and identify major organs (e.g., lungs, stomach, brain) and the components of major organ
systems (e.g., respiratory system, digestive system) in the human body.” In some cases, the additional
information indicates the scope of the objective appropriate for eighth grade students and appears after
an “i.e.,” such as in “Describe the basic process of photosynthesis (i.e., requires light, carbon dioxide,
water, and chlorophyll; produces glucose/sugar; and releases oxygen).”
Biology
At the eighth grade, students build on the foundational life science knowledge they learned in the
primary grades, and develop an understanding of many of the most important concepts in biology. The
biology domain includes six topic areas:
• Characteristics and life processes of organisms
• Cells and their functions
• Life cycles, reproduction, and heredity
• Diversity, adaptation, and natural selection
• Ecosystems
• Human health
Ecosystems
1. The flow of energy in ecosystems:
A. Identify and provide examples of producers, consumers, and decomposers; construct or
interpret food web diagrams.
Human Health
1. Causes, transmission, prevention of, and resistance to diseases:
A. Describe causes, transmission, and prevention of common viral, bacterial, and parasite
diseases (e.g., influenza, measles, HIV, COVID-19, tetanus, malaria).
B. Describe the role of the body’s immune system in resisting disease and promoting healing
(e.g., antibodies in the blood help the body resist infection and white blood cells fight
Chemistry
At the eighth grade, students’ study of chemistry extends beyond developing an understanding of
everyday phenomena to learning the central concepts and principles that are needed for understanding
practical applications of chemistry and undertaking later, more advanced study. The chemistry domain
includes three topic areas:
• Composition of matter
• Properties of matter
• Chemical change
The composition of matter topic area focuses on differentiating elements, compounds, and mixtures
E
and understanding the particulate structure of matter. Included in this area also is the use of the
periodic table as an organizing principle for the elements. At a more macroscopic level, the properties
of matter topic area focuses on distinguishing between physical and chemical properties of matter and
understanding the properties of mixtures and solutions and the properties of acids and bases. The study
of chemical change focuses on the characteristics of chemical changes and the conservation of matter
during chemical changes.
Composition of Matter
1. Structure of atoms and molecules:
A. Describe atoms as composed of subatomic particles (i.e., negatively charged electrons
surrounding a nucleus containing positively charged protons and neutrons with no
charge).
B. Describe the structure of matter in terms of particles (i.e., atoms and molecules) and
describe molecules as combinations of atoms (e.g., H2O, O2, CO2).
2. Elements, compounds, and mixtures:
A. Describe the differences among elements, compounds, and mixtures; differentiate
between pure substances (i.e., elements and compounds) and mixtures (homogeneous and
heterogeneous) on the basis of their formation and composition.
3. The periodic table of elements:
A. Recognize that the periodic table is an arrangement of the known elements; recognize and
Properties of Matter
1. Physical and chemical properties of matter:
A. Distinguish between physical and chemical properties of matter.
B. Relate uses of materials to their physical properties (e.g., melting point, boiling point,
solubility, thermal conductivity).
C. Relate uses of materials to their chemical properties (e.g., tendency to rust, flammability).
2. Physical and chemical properties as a basis for classifying matter:
A. Classify substances according to physical properties that can be demonstrated or measured
(e.g., density, melting or boiling point, solubility, magnetic properties, electrical or thermal
conductivity).
B. Classify substances according to their chemical properties (e.g., reactivity, flammability).
3. Mixtures and solutions:
A. Explain how physical methods can be used to separate mixtures into their components.
B. Describe solutions in terms of substance(s) (i.e., solid, liquid, or gas solutes) dissolved in
a solvent and relate the concentration of a solution to the amounts of solute and solvent
present.
C. Explain how temperature, stirring, and surface area in contact with the solvent affect the
rate at which solutes dissolve.
4. Properties of acids and bases:
A. Recognize everyday substances as acids or bases based on their properties (e.g., acids
have pH less than 7; acidic foods usually have a sour taste; bases usually do not react with
metals; bases feel slippery).
B. Recognize that both acids and bases react with indicators to produce different color
changes.
C. Recognize that acids and bases neutralize each other.
Chemical Change
1. Characteristics of chemical changes:
A. Differentiate chemical from physical changes in terms of the transformation (reaction) of
one or more pure substances (reactants) into different pure substances (products).
B. Identify and describe evidence (i.e., temperature changes, gas production, precipitate
formation, color change, or light emission) that a chemical change has taken place.
Physics
As in the chemistry domain, students’ study of physics at the eighth grade extends beyond understanding
the scientific basis of common everyday observations to learning many of the central physics concepts
that are needed for understanding practical applications of physics or for undertaking advanced study
later in their education. The physics domain includes five topic areas:
• Physical states and changes in matter
• Energy transformation and transfer
• Light and sound
• Electricity and magnetism
• Motion and forces
Eighth grade students are expected to be able to describe processes involved in changes in the state
of matter and relate states of matter to the distance and movement among particles. They also should
be able to identify different forms of energy, describe simple energy transformations, apply the principle
of conservation of total energy in practical situations, and understand the difference between thermal
energy (heat) and temperature. Students at this level also are expected to know some basic properties of
light and sound, relate these properties to observable phenomena, and solve practical problems involving
the behavior of light and sound. In the topic area of electricity and magnetism, students should be
familiar with the electrical conductivity of common materials, current flow in electric circuits, and the
difference between simple series and parallel circuits. They also should be able to describe properties and
uses of permanent magnets and electromagnets. Students’ understanding of motion and forces should
include knowing general types and characteristics of forces and how simple machines function. They
should understand the concepts of pressure and density and be able to predict qualitative changes in
motion based on the forces acting on an object.
Earth Science
Topics covered in the teaching and learning of Earth science draw on the fields of geology, astronomy,
meteorology, hydrology, and oceanography, and are related to concepts in biology, chemistry, and physics.
Although separate courses in Earth science covering all of these topics are not taught in all countries, it
is expected that understandings related to Earth science topic areas will have been included in a science
curriculum covering the physical and life sciences or in separate courses such as geography and geology.
The TIMSS 2023 Science Framework identifies the following topic areas that are universally considered
to be important for students at the eighth grade to understand as they learn about the planet on which
they live and its place in the universe:
• Earth’s structure and physical features
• Earth’s processes, cycles, and history
• Earth’s resources, their use, and conservation
• Earth in the Solar System and the universe
Eighth grade students are expected to have some general knowledge about the structure and physical
features of Earth, including Earth’s structural layers, and the atmosphere. Students also should have a
conceptual understanding of processes, cycles, and patterns, including geological processes that have
occurred over Earth’s history, the water cycle, and patterns of weather and climate. Students should
demonstrate knowledge of Earth’s resources and their use and conservation, and relate this knowledge to
practical solutions to resource management issues. At this level, the study of Earth and the Solar System
includes understanding how observable phenomena relate to the movements of Earth and the Moon,
and describing the features of Earth, the Moon, and other planets.
Earth’s Structure and Physical Features
1. Earth’s structure and physical characteristics:
A. Describe the structure of the Earth (i.e., crust, mantle, inner core, and outer core) and the
physical characteristics of these distinct parts.
B. Describe the distribution of water on Earth in terms of its physical state (i.e., ice, water, and
water vapor), and fresh versus salt water.
2. Components of Earth’s atmosphere and atmospheric conditions:
A. Recognize that Earth’s atmosphere is a mixture of gases; identify the relative abundance of
its main components (i.e., nitrogen, oxygen, water vapor, and carbon dioxide), relate these
components to everyday life processes involving oxygen, water vapor, and carbon dioxide
(e.g., human lung function, photosynthesis).
B. Relate changes in atmospheric conditions (i.e., temperature and pressure) to changes in
altitude.
For the fourth and eighth grades, each content domain includes items developed to address each of
the three cognitive domains. For example, the life science content domain includes knowing, applying,
and reasoning items, as do the other content domains. The following sections further describe the
thinking processes that define the cognitive domains.
Knowing
Items in this domain assess students’ knowledge of facts, relationships, processes, concepts, and
equipment. Accurate and broad-based factual knowledge forms a foundation that students can draw
upon to successfully engage in the more complex cognitive activities essential to the scientific enterprise.
Identify or state facts, relationships, and concepts; identify the
characteristics or properties of specific organisms, materials, and
Recognize processes; identify the appropriate uses for scientific equipment and
procedures; and recognize and use scientific vocabulary, symbols,
abbreviations, units, and scales.
Describe or identify descriptions of properties, structures, and functions
Describe of organisms and materials, and relationships among organisms,
materials, and processes and phenomena.
Provide or identify examples of organisms, materials, and processes that
Provide Examples possess certain specified characteristics; and clarify statements of facts or
concepts with appropriate examples.
Applying
Items in this domain require students to engage in applying knowledge of scientific facts, relationships,
processes, concepts, equipment, and methods in contexts likely to be common in the teaching and
learning of science.
Reasoning
Items in this domain require students to engage in reasoning to analyze data and other information, draw
conclusions, and extend their understandings to new situations. Scientific reasoning also encompasses
developing hypotheses as well as designing scientific models and investigations. In contrast to the
more direct applications of science facts and concepts exemplified in the applying domain, items in the
reasoning domain may involve less common or more complicated contexts. Answering such items can
involve more than one approach or strategy.
1 Kelly, D., Centurino, V. A. S., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2020). TIMSS 2019 encyclopedia: Education policy
and curriculum in mathematics and science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study
Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/encyclopedia/
2 Kelly, D., Centurino, V. A. S., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2020). TIMSS 2019 encyclopedia: Education policy
and curriculum in mathematics and science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study
Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/encyclopedia/
Overview
In addition to measuring trends in students’ mathematics and science achievement, TIMSS collects
important information about contexts for student learning. Educational research, including previous
cycles of TIMSS, has long demonstrated substantive relationships among learning environments and
student achievement across countries. Students with more opportunities to learn and more supportive
learning environments consistently have higher mathematics and science achievement than those who
do not. While the indicators and components of these factors may shift (particularly with the ongoing
introduction of new technological tools and approaches for digital learning), these relationships have
remained stable over time.
Previous cycles of the TIMSS assessment have provided high-quality measures of mathematics
and science achievement for fourth and eighth grade students, as well as extensive information about
those students’ in- and out-of-school experiences. These data are an important resource for research
on improving mathematics and science education. TIMSS 2023 builds upon this foundation, collecting
information that allows for measurement of contextual factors that have remained relevant over time,
while also addressing new areas of research and policy relevance.
The TIMSS 2023 Context Questionnaire Framework outlines the information to be collected in the
TIMSS 2023 Questionnaires with brief rationales and selected references. It begins with an overview
of the questionnaires and a brief summary of their development process. A discussion of the analytic
approach employed in the construction of scales for TIMSS 2023 follows this introduction. Similar to
previous TIMSS cycles, the bulk of the framework is organized by five areas of influence on students’
mathematics and science achievement: home contexts, school contexts, classroom contexts, student
attributes, and national contexts.
Home Contexts
Home Environment Support
Home Resources
Parents’ or guardians’ socioeconomic status has long had consistent relationships with students’ academic
achievement.3,4,5 This pattern holds across both developed and developing countries, and socioeconomic
academic achievement gaps have grown within the past few decades.6,7 Socioeconomic status is often
indicated through proxy variables, including parental level of education and occupation. TIMSS expands
this classic definition by also collecting information about various resources for learning that are available
in the home, such as the number of books, a quiet place to do schoolwork, and access to the internet
and various digital devices.
For fourth grade students, TIMSS collects and summarizes information about home resources
through the Home Resources for Learning scale, which is created from items in the Home and Student
Questionnaires. The eighth grade counterpart is the Home Educational Resources scale, which is created
from items in the Student Questionnaire.
Preprimary Education
Research has shown the importance of preprimary education (e.g., preschool, kindergarten) in influencing
later academic outcomes.24,25 High-quality preprimary education and other early childhood interventions
can be especially beneficial for students from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds.26,27
At-Home Learning
TIMSS also aims to gather information about the specific learning resources that were available to fourth
grade students while they were home from school because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Parents are asked
to indicate the resources their child’s school provided during the pandemic. Parents are also asked if they
provided particular learning resources for their child, and if they believe their child’s learning progress
has been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
School Contexts
School Characteristics
Size and Geographic Location
Internationally, schools vary in size and are located in a variety of different geographical areas (e.g.,
urban, suburban, rural). Smaller schools can provide more intimate learning environments, which may
be beneficial for students.28 Smaller schools in rural areas may also face particular challenges, such as
lower budgets and difficulty recruiting highly qualified teachers; however, there is still great diversity in
resources among rural schools.29,30,31 Depending on the country, schools in urban or suburban areas may
also have access to more educational resources outside the school (e.g., museums, libraries, bookstores)
than schools in rural areas.
TIMSS obtains information about school size and geographic area through the School Questionnaire
for the both fourth and eighth grades.
School Resources
Resources for Mathematics and Science Instruction
Adequate facilities and sufficient instructional resources are important for maintaining favorable school
learning environments.40 Although “adequacy” of resources can be relative, the supply and quality of
school resources have been shown to be critical for quality instruction.41,42 Important resources include
well-maintained school facilities, qualified staff, and access to adequate technologies (e.g., computers,
tablets, software) for instruction.
TIMSS conceptualizes school resources as both general and subject-specific, collecting information
on general resources such as school building facilities and instructional space or materials, as well
as resources specific to mathematics and science instruction. These subject-specific resources include
teachers with specialized training in mathematics or science, relevant library resources for mathematics
and science, and materials for carrying out hands-on science experiments or investigations. The
Instruction Affected by Mathematics Resource Shortages – Principals’ Reports and Instruction Affected by
Science Resource Shortages – Principals’ Reports scales summarize this information for both the fourth
and eighth grades.
Student Bullying
Bullying is a unique aspect of school safety because it involves repeated aggressive behavior intended to
intimidate or harm students. Bullying can take a variety of forms, both mental and physical, and may
occur in person or virtually. Cyberbullying through both online games and social media has become
more prevalent as access to digital devices among children has increased.62,63,64 Experiencing in-person
or cyberbullying causes distress to victims and is associated with poorer academic achievement.65,66,67
TIMSS collects information regarding the frequency of student bullying from fourth and eighth
grade students and summarizes this information in the Student Bullying scale for each grade.
Professional Development
Professional development is an important component of continuing education for the teaching
profession, and teacher participation in effective professional development activities can lead to positive
changes in teacher practices.77 Effective professional development engages teachers through concrete
tasks, is sustained and ongoing, and provides teachers space to reflect on their teaching.78 Teachers are
more likely to participate in professional development when they are encouraged and supported to
do so.79
TIMSS obtains teacher professional development information through the Teacher Questionnaire for
both the fourth and eighth grades. Teachers are asked to indicate topics for which they have participated
in professional development, as well as those for which they feel they need professional development.
Instructional Strategies
Teachers vary in their instructional strategies, both internationally and within countries.82 Effective
instruction in mathematics can include practices such as asking students to explain their answers or
purposefully practice mathematical procedures.83,84 Hands-on activities and experiments can be helpful
in promoting students’ understanding of science, although research suggests that such activities should
be appropriately scaffolded and supported.85,86
Instructional Clarity
Instructional clarity concerns students’ perceptions of teachers’ instructional strategies.87 Teachers with
a high degree of instructional clarity provide straightforward explanations of content and effectively
monitor student understanding, employing a variety of pedagogical techniques as required.88,89 Linking
instruction to students’ prior knowledge is also likely to increase instructional clarity.90 Instructional
clarity is also related to establishing a supportive classroom climate where teachers engage in practices
such as providing helpful feedback and clearly addressing student questions.91 Instructional clarity has
been shown to have positive relationships with student achievement.92
TIMSS measures students’ perceptions of their teachers’ instructional clarity through the Student
Questionnaire at the fourth and eighth grades as a complement to teachers’ reports of their instructional
strategies. Their responses are summarized in the Instructional Clarity scales for mathematics and science
lessons. Eighth grade students enrolled in separate science subjects provide information for each subject
in which they are enrolled.
Classroom Assessment
Classroom assessment is an important component of teaching, serving both formative and summative
functions.100 Teachers have a number of ways to monitor student progress and achievement, including
observing students as they work, asking students to answer questions during class, or administering
written assessments. Results of these classroom assessments can help teachers engage with students and
determine the best course of action during instruction. Clarifying or re-teaching concepts on the basis
of a variety of ongoing classroom assessment strategies can improve student achievement.101,102
TIMSS gathers information about classroom assessment through the Teacher Questionnaire for the
fourth and eighth grades. Teachers indicate the importance they place on various assessment strategies
for gathering information about student learning, including observations, written assessments, and
long-term projects.
Classroom Climate
Classroom Management
Classroom management refers to noninstructional procedures that promote student learning and
discourage disruptive behavior.110 Although direct links between classroom management and student
achievement are difficult to establish, some research suggests that effective classroom management has
indirect, positive effects on student achievement.111,112
TIMSS obtains information on classroom management from fourth and eighth grade students.
For students, this information is summarized in the Disorderly Behavior During Mathematics or Science
Lessons scales. Eighth grade students enrolled in separate science subjects complete this scale for each
subject in which they are enrolled.
Digital Self-Efficacy
Although students participating in TIMSS 2023 have greater access to information technology and
digital devices than past generations, it is a mistake to assume that they innately understand how they
work.125 Students vary in both their actual knowledge of digital devices, as well as their self-efficacy for
using them.126,127
TIMSS collects information regarding fourth and eighth grade students’ self-efficacy in the use
of information technology through the Digital Self-Efficacy scale. Students indicate how well they can
perform simple digital tasks, such as writing text, as well as more complex tasks, such as recognizing
trustworthy websites and learning to use new apps or programs.
National Contexts
In every country, the educational system is embedded in a unique configuration of historical, economic,
and language factors that combine to determine priorities in how the system is organized for teaching and
learning. In addition to the more granular data described in the previous sections, TIMSS also gathers
information on system-level characteristics that may contribute to students’ learning of mathematics
and science. Countries participating in TIMSS 2023 contribute information on many of these factors
through chapters in the TIMSS 2023 Encyclopedia, along with information collected through the
curriculum questionnaire. In particular, information collected on national contexts focuses on countries’
organization of their education systems and their mathematics and science curricula. Specific curricular
information is collected for both the fourth and eighth grades.
Language(s) of Instruction
Some countries have one commonly spoken language, while others are historically multilingual.
Immigration has also increased the language diversity in many countries over time. TIMSS collects
data on any official languages of instruction, as well as if mathematics and science instruction is typically
presented to students in their native language.
2 Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of EM algorithm. Applied Psychological
Measurement, 16, 159-176.
3 Dahl, G.B., & Lochner, L. (2012). The impact of family income on child achievement: Evidence from the earned
income tax credit. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1927–1956.
4 Davis-Kean, P.E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the
indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294-304.
5 Sirin, S.R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review
of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
6 Chmielewski, A.K. (2019). The global increase in the socioeconomic achievement gap, 1964 to 2015. American
Sociological Review, 84(3), 517-544.
7 Kim, S., Cho, H., & Kim. (2019). Socioeconomic status and academic outcomes in developing countries: a meta-
analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 875-916.
8 Entorf, H., & Minoiu, N. (2005). What a difference immigration policy makes: A comparison of PISA scores in
Europe and traditional countries of immigration. German Economic Review, 6(3), 355–376.
9 Robertson, S. & Graven, M. (2019). Language as an including or excluding factor in mathematics teaching and
learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32, 77-101.
10 Taylor, L.C., Clayton, J.D., & Rowley, S.J. (2004). Academic socialization: Understanding parental influences on
children’s school-related development in the early years. Review of General Psychology, 8(3), 163–178.
11 Centurino, V.A.S. (2021). Using TIMSS to examine parental influences on fourth grade students’ science
achievement and attitudes toward learning and doing science [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Boston
College.
12 Hill, N.E., & Tyson, D.F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the
strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763.
13 Hong, S., & Ho, H.–Z. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student
achievement: Second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology,
97(1), 32–42.
14 Pinquart, M. & Ebeling, M. (2020). Parental educational expectations and academic achievement in children
and adolescents—a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 463-480.
15 Gustafsson, J.-E., Hansen, K.Y., & Rosén, M. (2013). Effects of home background on student achievement in
reading, mathematics, and science at the fourth grade. In M.O. Martin & I.V.S. Mullis (Eds.), TIMSS and PIRLS
2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for
early learning (pp. 181–287). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
16 Duncan, G.J., Dowsett, C.J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A.C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L.S., Feinstein,
L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later
achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428-1446.
18 Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-
year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460.
19 Zhu, J., & Chiu, M.M. (2019). Early home numeracy activities and later mathematics achievement: early
numeracy, interest, and self-efficacy as mediators. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 173-191.
20 Anders, Y., Rossbach, H.G., Weinert, S., Ebert, S., Kuger, S., Lehrl, S., & von Maurice, J. (2012). Home and
preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early
Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 231–244.
21 Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later
school success. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–29.
22 Punter, A., Glas, C.A., & Meelissen, M.R.M. (2016). Psychometric framework for modeling parental involvement
and reading literacy. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IEA
23 Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Foy, P. (2013). The impact of reading ability on TIMSS mathematics and science
achievement at the fourth grade: An analysis by item reading demands. In M.O. Martin & I.V.S. Mullis (Eds.),
TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—
Implications for early learning (pp. 67–108). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center,
Boston College.
24 Duncan, G.J., & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2),
109–132.
25 McCoy, D.C., Yoshikawa, H., Ziol-Guest, K.M., Duncan, G.J., Schindler, H.S., Magnuson, K., Yang, R., Koepp,
A., & Shonkoff, J.P. (2017). Impacts of early childhood education on medium- and long-term educational
outcomes. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 474-487.
26 Bakken, L., Brown, N., & Downing, B. (2017). Early childhood education: the long-term benefits. Journal of
Research in Childhood Education, 31(2), 255-269.
27 Duncan, G.J., & Sojourner, A.J. (2013). Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-
based cognitive and achievement gaps? Journal of Human Resources, 48(4), 945–968.
28 Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). School connectedness: Strategies for increasing protective
factors among youth. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009.
29 Hudson, S. & Hudson, P. (2019). “Please help me find teachers for my rural and remote school:” a model for
teaching readiness. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 29(3).
30 Maranto, R. & Shuls, J.V. (2013). How do we get them on the farm? Efforts to improve rural teacher recruitment
and retention in Arkansas. The Rural Educator, 34(1).
31 Greenough, R. & Nelson, S.R. (2015). Recognizing the variety of rural schools. Peabody Journal of Education,
90(2), 322-332.
32 Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D., & York, R.L.
(1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, US
Government Printing Office.
34 Willms, J.D. (2006). Learning divides: Ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and
schooling systems. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
35 Canales, A. & Webb, A. (2018). Educational achievement of indigenous students in Chile: school composition
and peer effects. Comparative Education Review, 62(2), 231-273.
36 Chesters, J. & Daly, A. (2017). Do peer effects mediate the association between family socio-economic status and
educational achievement? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52, 63-77.
37 Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we
know thus far? In E.A. Hanushek, S.J. Machin, & L. Wößmann, Handbook of the economics of education (pp.
249–277). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
38 Akiba, M., LeTendre, G.K., & Scribner, J.P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement
in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.
39 Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap
between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307.
40 Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N.M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and
teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 190–213.
41 Glewwe, P.W., Hanushek, E.A., Humpage, S.D., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes
in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010. In P. Glewwe (Ed.), Education policy in
developing countries (pp. 13–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42 Hanushek, E.A., & Wößmann, L. (2017). School resources and student achievement: A review of cross-country
economic research. In M. Rosén, K.Y. Hansen, & U. Wolff (Eds.), Cognitive abilities and educational outcomes
(pp. 149–171). Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Switzerland: Springer International
Publishing.
43 Hoy, W.K. (2012). School characteristics that make a difference for the achievement of all students: a 40-year
odyssey. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 76-97.
44 Martin, M.O., Foy, P., Mullis, I.V.S., & O’Dwyer, L.M. (2013). Effective schools in reading, mathematics, and
science at the fourth grade. In M.O. Martin & I.V.S. Mullis (Eds.), TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among
reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for early learning. Chestnut Hill,
MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
45 Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2014). School emphasis on academic success: Exploring changes in science
performance in Norway between 2007 and 2011 employing two-level SEM. Educational Research and Evaluation,
20(4), 308–327.
46 Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J., & Hoy, A.W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement.
American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446.
47 Wu, J.H., Hoy, W.K., & Tarter, C.J. (2013). Enabling school structure, collective responsibility, and a culture
of academic optimism: Toward a robust model of school performance in Taiwan. Journal of Educational
Administration, 51(2), 176–193.
49 Admiraal, W., Veldman, I., Mainhard, T. & van Tartwijk. (2019). A typology of veteran teachers’ job satisfaction:
their relationships with their students and the nature of their wok. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 337-355.
50 Kelly, S., & Northrop, L. (2015). Early career outcomes for the “best and the brightest”: Selectivity, satisfaction,
and attrition in the beginning teacher longitudinal survey. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 624–
656.
51 Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession:
Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education:
An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(6), 1029–1038.
52 Joyce, H.D., & Early, T.J. (2014). The impact of school connectedness and teacher support on depressive
symptoms in adolescents: A multilevel analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 101–107.
53 Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E.T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, & de Boer, H. (2020). The relationship between school
belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary
education: a meta-analytic review. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641-680.
54 Renshaw, T.L., Long, A.C.J., & Cook, C.R. (2015). Assessing adolescents’ positive psychological functioning
at school: Development and validation of the student subjective wellbeing questionnaire. School Psychology
Quarterly, 30(4), 534–552.
55 Cheng, A., & Peterson, P.E. (2017). How satisfied are parents with their children’s schools? Education Next, 17(2),
21–27.
56 Stacer, M.J., & Perrucci, R. (2013). Parental involvement with children at school, home, and community. Journal
of Family and Economic Issues, 34(3), 340–354.
57 Lacoe, J. (2020). Too scared to learn? The academic consequences of feeling unsafe in the classroom. Urban
Education, 55(10), 1385-1418.
58 Martin, M.O., Foy, P., Mullis, I.V.S., & O’Dwyer, L.M. (2013). Effective schools in reading, mathematics, and
science at the fourth grade. In M.O. Martin & I.V.S. Mullis (Eds.), TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among
reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for early learning. Chestnut Hill,
MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
59 Konishi, C., Hymel, S., Zumbo, B. D., & Li, Z. (2010). Do school bullying and student-teacher relationships
matter for academic achievement? A multilevel analysis. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 19–39.
60 Kutsyuruba, B., Klinger, D.A., & Hussain, A. (2015). Relationships among school climate, school safety, and
student achievement and well-being: A review of the literature. Review of Education, 3(2), 103–135.
61 Gottfredson, G.D., Gottfredson, D.C., Payne, A.A., & Gottfredson, N.C. (2005). School climate predictors of
school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in
Crime and Delinquency, 42(4), 412–444.
62 O’Neill, B. & Dinh, T. (2015). Mobile technologies and the incidence of cyberbullying in seven European
countries: Findings from net children go mobile. Societies, 5, 384-398.
63 Dalla Pozza, V., Di Pietro, A., Morel, S., & Psaila, E. (2016). Cyberbullying among young people. European
Parliament Policy Department C – Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
65 Konishi, C., Hymel, S., Zumbo, B. D., & Li, Z. (2010). Do school bullying and student-teacher relationships
matter for academic achievement? A multilevel analysis. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 19–39.
66 Kowalski, R.M., & Limber, S.P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and
traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, S13-S20.
67 Tokunaga, R.S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on
cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287.
68 Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, S.E., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of
instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning.
American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.
69 Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-
performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92.
70 Azaiez, H., & Slate, J.R. (2017). Student achievement differences as a function of principal longevity. Journal of
Advances in Education Research, 2(3), 157-162.
71 Miller, A. (2013). Principal turnover and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 36(3), 60–72.
72 Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.
73 Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student
achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
74 Harris, D.N., & Sass, T.R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public
Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.
75 Ladd, H.F., & Sorensen, L.C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in
middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279.
76 Papay, J.P., & Kraft, M. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological
challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119.
77 Yang, R., Porter, A.C., Massey, C.M., Merlino, J.F., & Desimone, L.M. (2019). Curriculum-based teacher
professional development in middle school science: a comparison of training focused on cognitive science
principles versus content knowledge. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 57(4), 536-566.
78 Capps, D.K., Crawford, B.A., & Constas, M.A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional
development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education,
23(3), 291–318.
79 Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of
reform. Phi Delta Kappan Magazine, 92(6), 81–92.
80 Hanushek, E.A., & Wößmann, L. (2017). School resources and student achievement: A review of cross-country
economic research. In M. Rosén, K.Y. Hansen, & U. Wolff (Eds.), Cognitive Abilities and Educational Outcomes
(pp. 149–171). Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Switzerland: Springer International
Publishing.
81 Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Loveless, T. (2016). 20 years of TIMSS: International trends in mathematics and
science achievement, curriculum, and instruction. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study
Center, Boston College.
83 Lehtinen, E., Hannula-Sormunen, M., McMullen, J., & Gruber, H. (2017). Cultivating mathematical skills: from
drill-and-practice to deliberate practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 625-636.
84 Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A.M., & Durkin, K. (2017). Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics
learning: a meta-analysis and instructional design principles. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 599-611.
85 Arnold, J.C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—what kind of support do
they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719-2749.
86 Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an
analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching.
Educational Psychologist, 41(2). 75-86.
87 Nilsen, T., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Conceptual framework and methodology of this report. In T.
Nilsen & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality, student outcomes (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam,
The Netherlands: IEA.
88 Ferguson, R.F. (2012). Can student surveys measure teaching quality? Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 24–28.
89 Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry
instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and
Instruction, 19, 527–537.
90 McLaughlin, M., McGrath, D.J., Burian-Fitzgerald, M.A., Lanahan, L., Scotchmer, M., Enyeart, C., & Salganik, L.
(2005, April). Student content engagement as a construct for the measurement of effective classroom instruction
and teacher knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers
Association, Montreal, Canada.
91 Nilsen, T., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Conceptual framework and methodology of this report. In T.
Nilsen & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality, student outcomes (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam,
The Netherlands: IEA.
92 Bergem, O.K., Nilsen, T., & Scherer, R. (2016). Undervisningskvalitet i matematikk. In O.K. Bergem, H.
Kaarstein, & T. Nilsen, Vi kan lykkes i realfag. Resultater og analyser fra TIMSS 2015 (pp.120–136). Retrieved
from https://www.idunn.no/vi-kan-lykkes-i-realfag#/contents
93 Furtak, E.M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D.C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of
inquiry-base science teaching: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329.
94 Teig, N., Scerer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018). More isn’t always better: the curvilinear relationship between inquiry-
based teaching and student achievement in science. Learning and Instruction, 56, 20-29.
95 Rönnebeck, S. Bernholt, S., & Rophol, M. (2016). Searching for common ground—a literature review of
empirical research in scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197.
96 Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
97 Schmidt, W.H., Burroughs, N.A., & Houang, R.T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational
inequality: an international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44, 371-386.
98 Fan, H., Xu, J., Cai, Z., He., & Fan, X. (2017). Homework and students’ achievement in math and science: a
30-year meta-analysis, 1986-2015. Educational Research Review, 20, 35-54.
99 Fernández-Alonso, R., Álvarez-Diaz, M., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2017). Students’ achievement and
homework assignment strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-11.
101 Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
102 Veldhuis, M. & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2020). Supporting primary school teachers’ classroom
assessment in mathematics education: effects on student achievement. Mathematics Education Research Journal,
32, 449-471.
103 Faber, J.M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A.J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics
achievement and student motivation: results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83-96.
104 Fishman, B., Riconscente, M., Snider, R., Tsai, T., & Plass, J. (2014). Empowering educators: Supporting
student progress in the classroom with digital games. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Retrieved from
gamesandlearning.umich.edu/agames
105 McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M.K., Franey., J.J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age:
How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,
48(3), 194–211.
106 Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., Kelly, D.L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in
mathematics and science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website:
https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
107 Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence,
beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
108 Gerick, J., Eickelmann, B., & Bos, W. (2017). School-level predictors for the use of ICT in schools and students’
CIL in international comparison. Large Scale Assessments in Education, 5(5), 1-13.
109 Hatlevik, O.E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence,
strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5),
555-567.
110 Oliver, R.M., Wehby, J.H., & Reschly, D.J. (2011). Teacher classroom management practices: effects on disruptive
or aggressive student behavior. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7, 1-55.
111 Herman, K.C., Reinke, W.M., Dong, N., & Bradshaw, C.P. (2020). Can effective classroom behavior management
increase student achievement in middle school? Findings from a group randomized trial. Journal of Educational
Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000641
112 Van Dijk, W., Gage, N.A., & Grasley-Boy, N. (2019). The relation between classroom management and
mathematics achievement: a multilevel structural equation model. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 1173-1186.
113 Faught, E.L., Williams, P.L., Willows, N.D., Asbridge, M., & Veugelers, P.J. (2017). The association between food
insecurity and academic achievement in Canadian school-aged children. Public Health Nutrition, 20(15), 2778-
2785.
114 Taras, H. (2005). Nutrition and performance at school. Journal of School Health, 75(6), 199-213.
115 Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York:
Plenum Press.
116 Kennedy, J., Quinn, F., & Lyons, T. (2020). The keys to STEM: Australian year 7 students’ attitudes and
intentions towards science, mathematics and technology courses. Research in Science Education, 50, 1805-1832.
118 Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R.G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a
multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163.
119 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
120 Namkung, J.M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The relation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics
performance among school-aged students: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459-496.
121 Raccanello, D., Brondino, M., Moé, A., Stupnisky, R., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2019). Enjoyment, boredom, anxiety in
elementary schools in two domains: relations with achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(3),
449-469.
122 Mujtaba, T., Sheldrake, R., Reiss, M.J., & Simon, S. (2018). Students’ science attitudes, beliefs, and context:
associations with science and chemistry aspirations. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 644-667.
123 Tai, R.H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144.
124 Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world. IEA
International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 international report. Cham, Switzerland: Spring.
125 Kirscher, P.A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. (2017). Teaching
and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142.
126 Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Guðmundsdóttir, G.B. (2015). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer
and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118, 107–119.
127 Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R. & Hatlevik, O. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their
achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103–116.
128 Duncan, G.J. & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2),
109-132.
129 Broekhuizen, M.L., Mokrova, I.L., Burchinal, M.R., & Garrett-Peters, P.T. (2016). Classroom quality at pre-
kindergarten and kindergarten and children’s social skills and behavior problems. Early Childhood Research
Quarterly, 36, 212–222.
130 Mashburn, A.J., Pianta, R.C., Hamre, B.K., Downer, J.T., Barbarin, O.A., Bryant, D., Burchinal M., Early D.M., &
Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and childrenʼs development of academic,
language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.
131 Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., & Foy, P. (2011). Age distribution and reading achievement configurations
among fourth-grade students in PIRLS 2006. IERI Monograph Series: Issues and Methodologies in Large-scale
Assessments, 4, 9–33.
132 García-Pérez, J., Hidalgo-Hidalgo, M., & Robles-Zurita, J.A. (2014). Does grade retention affect students’
achievement? Some evidence from Spain. Applied Economics, 46(12), 1372–1392.
133 Kretschmann, J., Vock, M., Lüdtke, O., Jansen, M., & Gronostaj, A. (2019). Effects of grade retention on students’
motivation: A longitudinal study over 3 years of secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8),
1432-1446.
135 Stacey, O., De Lazzari, G., Grayson, H., Griffin, H., Jones, E., Taylor, A., & Thomas, D. (2018). The globalization
of science curricula. IEA Research for Education (A Series of In-depth Analyses Based on Data of the International
Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)), Volume 3. Springer, Cham.
Overview
TIMSS is designed to provide countries with information about their students’ mathematics and science
achievement that can be used to inform evidence-based decisions for improving educational policy and
practice. Conducted every four years since 1995, with each assessment linked to the one that preceded
it, TIMSS provides regular and timely data for educators and policymakers on trends in students’
mathematics and science achievement.
Central to TIMSS’s mission is the measurement of student achievement in mathematics and
science in a way that does justice to the breadth and richness of these subjects as they are taught in the
participating countries, and that monitors countries’ improvements or declines by tracking trends in
student performance from one assessment cycle to the next. This requires an assessment that is wide
ranging in its coverage and difficulties of mathematics and science and innovative in its measurement
approach. With a diverse set of countries participating in TIMSS, with varying curricula and ability levels,
this has always been a challenge. In the past, TIMSS has offered less difficult versions of mathematics that
countries participating at the fourth grade could choose to administer, starting with TIMSS Numeracy
in 20151 and following up with the TIMSS less difficult mathematics assessment in 2019.2 These efforts
were successful in expanding the TIMSS coverage of students at the lower end of the mathematics ability
distribution. However, the linked parallel assessments were complex both conceptually and operationally.
Most importantly, they did not address the need for more challenging mathematics material for higher
achieving students or science.
TIMSS continues its tradition of innovation in each assessment cycle. TIMSS 2019 began the
transition from paper-and-pencil to digital format, with about half of the countries choosing digital
format and half keeping paper format as in previous TIMSS assessments. For TIMSS 2023, the vast
majority of countries have transitioned, or are transitioning, to a digital assessment. Moreover,
TIMSS 2023 is adopting a single unified assessment based on a new group adaptive assessment design
to address the need for a broader range of assessment difficulty and better targeting of student ability.
The group adaptive design was introduced in the PIRLS 2021 assessment and its rationale can be found
in Appendix A of the PIRLS 2021 Assessment Design chapter.3
In 2019, the TIMSS computer-based assessments included Problem Solving and Inquiry (PSI)
tasks—two item blocks for mathematics and two item blocks for science at each grade—arranged in
two separate assessment booklets. Half of the PSI item blocks—one per subject and grade—were secured
for use as trend blocks in TIMSS 2023. Also, the TIMSS fourth grade assessment was accompanied by a
less difficult mathematics assessment consisting of the same science item blocks, and with 10 of the 14
mathematics item blocks designed specifically with easier material, six of which were secured for future
Booklet Design
In TIMSS, each student is randomly assigned a test booklet (or booklet equivalent in the context of
computer-based assessments) consisting of two mathematics item blocks and two science item blocks. In
TIMSS 2023, the 14 mathematics and 14 science item blocks at each grade are arranged into 14 booklets
with two mathematics and two science blocks each, with each item block appearing in two booklets
and paired with different item blocks each time. Exhibit 4.4 summarizes the item block pairings among
the mathematics and science item blocks that make up each booklet. The pairing pattern is identical
at both grades. The direction of the arrows indicates which item block comes first in the booklet. For
example, an arrow points from block ME1, an easy block, to MM1, a medium block, indicating these
two blocks share a booklet, with ME1 preceding MM1. Note that when blocks of different difficulties
are paired in the same booklet, the easier of the two always comes first. Because each booklet consists
of two mathematics and two science item blocks, the matching pairs of mathematics and science blocks
appear in the same booklet. For example, ME1 & MM1 appear in the same booklet as their science
counterparts SE1 and SM1.
Subject Difficult Item Blocks Medium Item Blocks Easy Item Blocks
MD1 MM1 ME1
MD2 MM2 ME2
Mathematics MD3 MM3 ME3
MD4 MM4 ME4
MD5 — ME5
SD1 SM1 SE1
SD2 SM2 SE2
Science SD3 SM3 SE3
SD4 SM4 SE4
SD5 — SE5
The 14 assessment booklets at each grade are divided into two levels of difficulty, as follows:
• More difficult booklets (7) composed of either two difficult item blocks or one medium and
one difficult item block for each subject;
• Less difficult booklets (7) composed of either two easy item blocks or one easy and one
medium item block for each subject.
Exhibit 4.5 shows the item block assignments for the 14 TIMSS booklets, with booklets 1-7 being
the more difficult booklets and booklets 8-14 the less difficult ones. The assignments are identical for
both grades.
Student Assessment
Part 1 Part 2
Booklets
Booklet 1 SM1 SD1 MM1 MD1
Booklet 2 MD2 MD3 SD2 SD3
Booklet 3 SM2 SD2 MM2 MD2
More
Difficult Booklet 4 MD5 MD1 SD5 SD1
Booklets Booklet 5 SM3 SD3 MM3 MD3
Booklet 6 MM4 MD4 SM4 SD4
Booklet 7 SD4 SD5 MD4 MD5
Booklet 8 ME1 MM1 SE1 SM1
Booklet 9 SE1 SE2 ME1 ME2
Booklet 10 ME2 MM2 SE2 SM2
Less
Difficult Booklet 11 SE3 SE5 ME3 ME5
Booklets Booklet 12 ME3 MM3 SE3 SM3
Booklet 13 SE4 SM4 ME4 MM4
Booklet 14 ME5 ME4 SE5 SE4
Exhibit 4.6: Fourth Grade Assessment Booklets with Trend and New Block Assignments
Student Assessment
Part 1 Part 2
Booklets
Booklet 1 New SM1 (23) SE10 (19) New MM1 (23) ME08 (19)
Booklet 2 ME09 (15) New MD3 (23) SE13 (15) New SD3 (23)
Booklet 3 SE09 (15) SE13 (15) ME04 (19) ME09 (15)
More
Difficult Booklet 4 New MD5 (23) ME08 (19) New SD5 (23) SE10 (19)
Booklets Booklet 5 SE12 (19) New SD3 (23) ME10 (19) New MD3 (23)
Booklet 6 ME14 (19) MI01 (19) SE08 (19) SI02 (19)
Booklet 7 SI02 (19) New SD5 (23) MI01 (19) New MD5 (23)
Booklet 8 New ME1(23) New MM1 (23) New SE1 (23) New SM1 (23)
Booklet 9 New SE1 (23) SE14 (19) New ME1 (23) ME11 (15)
Booklet 10 ME11 (15) ME04 (19) SE14 (19) SE09 (15)
Less
Difficult Booklet 11 New SE3 (23) New SE5 (23) New ME3 (23) New ME5 (23)
Booklets Booklet 12 New ME3 (23) ME10 (19) New SE3 (23) SE12 (19)
Booklet 13 SE04 (19) SE08 (19) ME13 (15) ME14 (19)
Booklet 14 New ME5(23) ME13 (15) New SE5 (23) SE04 (19)
Exhibit 4.7: Eighth Grade Assessment Booklets with Trend and New Block Assignments
Student Assessment
Part 1 Part 2
Booklets
Booklet 1 New SM1 (23) SE04 (19) New MM1 (23) ME08 (19)
Booklet 2 ME12 (19) New MD3 (23) SE09 (15) New SD3 (23)
Booklet 3 SE11 (15) SE09 (15) ME04 (19) ME12 (19)
More
Difficult Booklet 4 New MD5 (23) ME08 (19) New SD5 (23) SE04 (19)
Booklets Booklet 5 SE10 (19) New SD3 (23) ME14 (19) New MD3 (23)
Booklet 6 ME10 (19) MI02 (19) SE14 (19) SI01 (19)
Booklet 7 SI01 (19) New SD5 (23) MI02 (19) New MD5 (23)
Booklet 8 New ME1(23) New MM1 (23) New SE1 (23) New SM1 (23)
Booklet 9 New SE1 (23) SE12 (19) New ME1 (23) ME11 (15)
Booklet 10 ME11 (15) ME04 (19) SE12 (19) SE11 (15)
Less
Difficult Booklet 11 New SE3 (23) New SE5 (23) New ME3 (23) New ME5 (23)
Booklets Booklet 12 New ME3 (23) ME14 (19) New SE3 (23) SE10 (19)
Booklet 13 SE13 (15) SE14 (19) ME13 (15) ME10 (19)
Booklet 14 New ME5(23) ME13 (15) New SE5 (23) SE13 (15)
Exhibit 4.8: Booklet Assignment Plan for Higher, Middle, and Lower Performing Countries
625
600
575
70 % More
Difficult 30 % Less
Difficult
550
525
500
475
50 % More
Difficult 50 % Less
Difficult
450
425
400
375
30 % More
Difficult 70 % Less
Difficult
TIMSS 2023
Part 1 Part 2
Paper Booklets
Booklet 1 MP04 MP08 SP04 SP08
Booklet 2 SP08 SP09 MP08 MP09
Booklet 3 MP09 MP10 SP09 SP10
Booklet 4 SP10 SP11 MP10 MP11
Booklet 5 MP11 MP12 SP11 SP12
Booklet 6 SP12 SP13 MP12 MP13
Booklet 7 MP13 MP14 SP13 SP14
Booklet 8 SP14 SP04 MP14 MP04
An alternate set of paper booklets is available for lower performing countries administering
the TIMSS 2023 paper assessment at the fourth grade. It is based on the TIMSS 2019 less difficult
mathematics assessment and also consists of trend item blocks. Exhibit 4.10 presents the eight paper
booklets and item blocks from the TIMSS 2019 fourth grade less difficult mathematics assessment. Six
of the eight mathematics trend item blocks are unique to the TIMSS 2019 less difficult assessment and
identifiable by the letters “MN” in the item block labels. The other two mathematics item blocks—MP08
and MP13, as well as all science item blocks are identical with the regular TIMSS 2023 paper assessment
shown in Exhibit 4.9.
Exhibit 4.10: TIMSS 2023 Paper Booklets with Item Blocks from Fourth Grade Less Difficult Mathematics
TIMSS 2023
Part 1 Part 2
Paper Booklets
Booklet 1 MN04 MP08 SP04 SP08
Booklet 2 SP08 SP09 MP08 MN09
Booklet 3 MN09 MP13 SP09 SP10
Booklet 4 SP10 SP11 MP13 MN11
Booklet 5 MN11 MN12 SP11 SP12
Booklet 6 SP12 SP13 MN12 MN13
Booklet 7 MN13 MN14 SP13 SP14
Booklet 8 SP14 SP04 MN14 MN04
The design of TIMSS 2023 paper booklets at both grades, including the less difficult mathematics
version, follow the same administration procedures as in the past. The trend item blocks being from
2019 means they are all of roughly the same difficulty level at each subject and grade. Consequently, the
group adaptive design is not present in their implementation. The less difficult paper assessment allows
some measure of adaptability for lower performing countries with respect to fourth grade mathematics.
Exhibit 4.11: TIMSS 2023 Student Testing Time – Fourth and Eighth Grades
Break
Break
2 Martin, M. O., Mullis, I.V.S., & Foy, P. (2017). TIMSS 2019 sssessment design. In Mullis, I.V.S., & Martin, M. O.
(Eds.), TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study
Center website: https://timss2019.org/wp-content/uploads/frameworks/T19-Assessment-Frameworks-Chapter-4.
pdf
3 Martin, M. O., von Davier, M., Foy, P., & Mullis, I.V.S. (2019). PIRLS 2021 sssessment design. In I.V.S. Mullis,
& M. O. Martin (Eds.), PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS
International Study Center website: http://pirls2021.org/frameworks/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/P21_
FW_Ch3_AssessDesign.pdf
4 Martin, M. O., von Davier, M., Foy, P., & Mullis, I.V.S. (2019). PIRLS 2021 sssessment design. In I.V.S. Mullis,
& M. O. Martin (Eds.), PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS
International Study Center website: http://pirls2021.org/frameworks/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/P21_
FW_Ch3_AssessDesign.pdf
5 UNESCO. (2012). International standard classification of education ISCED 2011. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.
org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf
6 Foy, P., Fishbein, B., von Davier, M., & Yin, L. (2020). Implementing the TIMSS 2019 scaling methodology.
In M. O. Martin, M. von Davier, & I.V.S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report
(pp. 12.1–12.146). Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: https://
timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods/chapter-12.html
Mathematics Science
Ray Philpot Yun-Ping Ge
Australian Council for Educational Research National Taipei University of Education
Australia Chinese Taipei
© IEA, 2021
International Association
for the Evaluation of
Educational Achievement
ISBN-978-1-889938-57-8