Interviewing Semester Notes
Chapter 1
Two parties
o Interviews are dyadic
Two distinct parties
Interviewer party and the interviewee party
o Can involve more than two people, but never more than two parties
Purpose and structure
o Interviews have a predetermined and serious purpose
Differs from convo
o Planning and structure
o At least minimally structured
Interactional / collaborative comm process
o Both parties are exchanging and sharing:
Roles
Responsibilities
Feelings
Beliefs
Motives
Info
o Interactional: exchanging and sharing
o Collaborative: meaning making
Mutual creation and sharing of messages that have vb and nvb meaning
that express interest.
Questions
o Tools of interview trade
Gathering info and checking accuracy or messages sent and received.
Interview definition
o Interactional, collaborative communication process involving two parties, at least
one of whom has a predetermined and serious purpose, that includes the asking of
questions.
Types of interviews
o Info gathering
Passive in interactions
Obtain insightful and useful info
Predetermined questions before interview
o Information giving
Difficult
Training, orienting, coaching, etc.
o Focus group
6-10 persons
Interviewer and unrelated interviewees Concentrates on a specific concern
Developing idea, product, or concern.
Difficult to arrange
o Selection interview
Employment interview
Aimed to see if they’re the best “fit” for org
Also, could be called a placement interview
Promotion, reassignment, or new role
o Performance interview
Advancing an employee
Terminating an employee
o Persuasive interview
Alter or reinforce the way the party thinks, feels, and/or acts.
Want to make someone change
o Counseling interviews
Helping interview
Technology
o Telephone
Lack of physical presence
Convenient
o Video
Focus on the interaction and not on the technology
More like being in person.
Pluses:
Detailed notetaking
Referring to notes
Checking watches
Reading texts
o Email
Good for audibly impaired
Must be collaborated for the same time so no break in questioning
o Webinar
Web based seminar
Present to large group of persons.
Class Notes (Chapter 1)
- Definition of interviewing
1. The act of giving and receiving information
- Characteristics of an interviewing
1. Dyadic
2 parties
Interviewer/interviewee
2. Predetermined and serious purpose
Planning and structure goals made
3. Interactional and collaborative
Both must participate
4. Questions
-
Chapter 2
5 dimensions of relationships
o Similarity
Do not assume too much from too little
Common ground (overlap)
o Inclusion
Desire to be included is essential to motivation
Must be a joint effort
o Affection
You communicate more with people you like
Establishing a “we” not you/me conversation
o Control
Sharing control heightens collaboration between parties
“What can I help to happen next”
o Trust
Trust is key to openness and self-disclosure in interviews
Mutual honesty
Relational history / memory
o History: will have preconceived ideas (good or bad) of how the interaction is going to
happen
o Memory: will remind us of how previous interactions were in the past.
o They both play a part in the interviewing process because it will either aide or inhibit
positive interactions from both parties.
Upward / downward communication
o ****
Dialectical tensions
o Important but opposing needs or desires
o May cause anxiousness and fearful about an outcome of an interview
o Disclosure casualty
o Failure if you don’t know how to manage your dialectical tensions.
Culture
o Need to know more about different cultures
o The less you know… the more anxious you could be about initiating
relationships/conversation.
Directive and nondirective approach
o Directive:
When you want or need to exert control over climate, formality, and pacing of
an interview.
Goal is to control the process
Information-giving interviews / interrogations / surveys & polls / persuasive
interviews (sales)
Control interactions
o Nondirective:
Interviewee to have considerable control over the amount and kinds of
information to give, length of answers to open-ended questions, the interview
climate, and formality of interactions.
Goal is to relinquish control
Counseling / health care / journalistic / oral history / performance review
Interview is more flexible and adaptable
Interviewee will feel more freely to volunteer up info
o Neither is suitable for ALL interview situations.
Self-concept, self-identity, and why is it important for interviews
o Self-concept / self-identity:
mental process by which you perceive and believe others perceive who you
have been, are at this time, and are likely to be in the future.
Self-esteem/self-worth
o Success in an interview may depend on your ability or inability to convince yourself that
you will be successful.
Self-fulfilling prophecy
3 levels of interaction
o Level 1: interactions are safe and superficial (door slightly open)
Low risk
Prompt brief/simple questions
Little to no relational history
Low self-disclosure
o Level 2: interactions are moderately safe and revealing (door half open)
Open-ended challenging questions
E.g., political issues
Prob into feelings / opinions
Potentially harmful to the interviewee
Less common than level 1
Must have positive relational history (length of arrow)
Self-disclosure is moderate
Moderate risk taking.
o Level 3: interactions are high in risk-taking (door open)
Avoidance of perceived threats in Q&A are difficult
Embarrassing / harmful info
Least common
Parties must have a well-established and trusting relationship. (short arrow)
Self-disclosure is maximum.
Gender
o Women disclose more than men and are allowed to express emotions.
Biggest issue in communication
o Assumption of communication and shared meaning.
60-93% of communication (according to research) is nonverbal.
Listening: evaluation/empathy
o Evaluation:
Intent to criticize, judge, discriminate, or diagnose content of interactions and
how you hear and observe them.
Avoid personal criticisms and judgements.
Try to understand before responding.
May diminish cooperation and level of disclosure
o Empathy
Must communicate genuine concern, understanding, and involvement with the
other party.
Goals: reassure, comfort, express warmth, and show sincere regard.
“Walk in another’s shoes”
Nonverbally
Avoid: interruptions, criticisms, and judgments.
Time and timing in interviews
o Time:
Either party determines the time of the interview
Not everyone treats time the same.
Time is money
o Timing:
Strategic selection of time and date for an interview to maximize the chances of
achieving your purpose
Proxemics
o Optimal proxemics for an interview: social distance (4-12 ft)
2-4 ft
o Whose turf are you on in an interview
o Optimum personal distances are based off of: age, gender, and culture.
Class notes: