Pub A Grammar Sketch and Lexicon of Arawak Lokono Dian
Pub A Grammar Sketch and Lexicon of Arawak Lokono Dian
Pub A Grammar Sketch and Lexicon of Arawak Lokono Dian
Willem J. A. Pet
A Grammar Sketch and Lexicon of
Arawak (Lokono Dian)
Willem J. A. Pet
SIL e-Books
30
Series Editor
George Huttar
Volume Editor
Mary Ruth Wise
Copy Editor
Eugene Burnham
Compositor
Judy Benjamin
Abstract
Willem J. A. Pet
Arawak (Lokono Dian), an Amerindian language in the Arawakan language family, is rel-
atively undescribed. The purpose of this study is to give a general, bottom-up sketch of
Arawak. It starts with comments on the phonology, then discusses morphology and syntax,
and ends with comments about discourse.
Typologically, Arawak is primarily a right-branching SVO language with postpositions.
Most noun modifiers precede their heads, though heavy relative clauses follow. Question
words, relative pronouns, and focused constituents appear at the left periphery of the
clause.
Of particular interest is an asymmetry involving the distribution of a dummy verb in
WH-movement constructions. Subjects, direct objects, time phrases, and locative phrases
may be moved without otherwise affecting the structure of a sentence. Focusing or ques-
tioning a manner adverbial, or fronting of a negative verb, however, involves the obliga-
tory insertion of a semantically empty dummy verb as the main verb.
This book is a revision of Lokono Dian: The Arawak Language of Suriname: A Sketch of its
Grammatical Structure and Lexicon, the author’s Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1987.
iii
Contents
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
Part 1: Grammar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1 General Comments about Arawak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2 Previous Studies of Arawak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2 Phonology and Morphology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1 Phonology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.1 Segmentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.2 Prefixes and Vowel Cluster Reduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1.3 Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1.4 Orthographic and Other Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Lexical Classes and Morphology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3 Nominals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3.1 Personal Pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3.1.1 Morphological Forms of Personal Pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3.1.2 Gender, Number, and Humanness in Arawak . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3.2 Demonstrative Pronouns and Adjectives, and Articles . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3.3 Nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3.3.1 Inalienable and Alienable Nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.3.3.2 Gender in Nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.3.3.3 Number in Nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.3.3.4 Shape Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.3.4 Derived Nouns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.3.4.1 Event Verb + -koana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.4.2 Stative Verb + -bero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.3.4.3 Event Verb + -lhin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.4.4 Noun Quantifier + -li, -ro, -ninon, -be . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
iv
Contents v
2.3.4.5 Verb + -n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.4.6 Verb + -thi, -tho, or -sia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.4.7 Complex Derived Nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4 Verbs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4.1 Event Verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4.1.1 Event Verb Stem Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4.1.2 Event Verb Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.4.1.3 Event Verb Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.4.1.4 Derived Event Verbs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.4.2 Stative Verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
2.4.2.1 Stative Verb Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.4.2.2 Derived Stative Verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.4.3 Other Verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.4.3.1 The Dummy Verb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.4.3.2 The Copula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
2.5 Postpositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.5.1 The Lexical Status of Postpositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.5.2 Kinds of Postpositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.5.3 Abbreviations, Compounds, and Suffixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.6 Functors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.6.1 Question Words and Relative Pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.6.2 Conjunctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.6.3 Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.6.4 Adverbial and Tense Particles, and Time Words . . . . . . . . . . . 50
3 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
3.1 Noun Phrase Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
3.1.1 The Determiner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
3.1.2 The Quantifier Phrase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.1.3 Possessive Noun Phrases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.1.4 Pre-Head Relative Clauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.1.5 The Head of the Noun Phrase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3.1.6 Post-Head Relative Clauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
3.2 Sentence Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
3.2.1 Event Sentences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
3.2.1.1 The ‘COMP’ Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
3.2.1.2 The TOPIC Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
3.2.1.3 Event Sentence Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.2.2 Dummy Verb Sentences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.2.2.1 The Result of Fronting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
3.2.2.2 Manner Adverbials Versus Time and Locative Phrases. . . . . . . 71
3.2.2.3 Dummy Verbs in Quotation Citations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
3.2.2.4 The Subject of Dummy Verb Sentences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3.2.3 Stative Sentences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3.2.3.1 Equative and Attributive Sentences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3.2.3.2 Stative Sentences with Stative Verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
4 Relative Clauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
4.1 Differences in Pre- and Post-Head Relative Clauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
4.2 Free Relative Clauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
vi Contents
vii
viii List of Figures
ix
Abbreviations
ACCMP accompaniment
ADJ adjective
ADV adverb
art article
ATTR attributive
AWAY directional: away
AUX auxiliary
BACK directional: back
BEN benefactive
CAUS causative
COMP complementizer
conj conjunction
CONT continuative/continuous/progressive
CONTR contrastive
D Dutch
DESID desiderative
EPEN epenthetic (for rhythm or syllable pattern)
EXPECT expected
FUT future
HABIL habilitative
H/HUM human
IMPF imperfective
INCH inchoative
INDIC indicative
INFL inflection
INTERJ interjection
INSTR instrument
IO indirect object
LSAP left sentential adjunction position
LOC generalized location, at
x
Abbreviations xi
M/MASC masculine
n noun
NESS necessitative
NGEN noun generalizer
NH non-human
NM non-masculine
num number
OBJ object
p particle
PERF perfect, perfective
PL plural
PLACE derive place noun from other noun
POSS possessed
pp postposition
PRES present
PRIV privative
pro pronoun
PRO pronominal
PRON pronoun
quant quantifier
qw question word
rp relative pronoun
SG/SING singular
SP Spanish
ST Sranan Tongo
SUB subordinate, nominalizer
SUBJ subject
THING nominalizer (an instrument)
tw time word
UNEXP unexpected
vd verb ditransitive
vi verb intransitive
vs verb stative
vt verb transitive
WH.OBJ/WH.O object-relativizer
WH.SUBJ/WH.S subject-relativizer
Part 1
Grammar
Chapter 1
Introduction
Arawak, known as Lokono Dian ‘people’s talk’ by its speakers, is the mother tongue of
at least 700 Amerindians of Suriname, South America, and is also spoken by an unde-
termined number of Arawaks in Guyana and French Guiana, and may extend into east-
ern Venezuela. Many more people claim to be Arawaks, or are of Arawak descent, but
no longer speak the language. In Suriname and Guyana all speakers are older adults
(Lewis 2009:305).
According to George Huttar (personal communication following a visit to the Arawak
area of Suriname in 2009), in the villages relatively accessible to the capital and to major
roads, it is those in their fifties and older who are fully fluent; younger adults understand
Arawak well but do not speak it well enough to use it with their children. It is possible that
in extreme western and extreme eastern Suriname there are some children who are native
speakers of Arawak.
Arawak is universally regarded as belonging to the Arawakan language family (see
Figure 1), which is one of the most widespread families found in South America (see
Noble 1965; Ruhlen 1975; Payne 1991; Aikhenvald 1999) and which formerly was also
widespread in the Caribbean (see Taylor 1977; Olsen 1974). In fact, people speaking a
form of Arawak very close to what is described in the following pages may have been
among the “Indians” whom Columbus met on his first journey to the New World
(Taylor 1977; Olsen 1974).
2
Introduction 3
Western
Amuesha (Yaneshaø)
Chamicuro
Central
Mehinaku
Parecís
Waurá
Yawalapití
Southern
Bolivia-Parana
Terêna
Bauré
Ignaciano
Trinitario
Purús
Apurinã
Iñapari
Mashco Piro
Manchinere
Yine (Piro)
Kampan
Asháninka
Ashéninka
Caquinte
Matsigenka
Nanti
Nomatsiguenga
Eastern
Palicur
Northern
Wapishana
Caribbean
Garífuna
TA-Arawakan
Lokono (Arawak)
Guajiro (Wayuu)
Paraujano
Taino
Inland
North-Amazon
Resígaro
Río Negro
Achagua
Baniwa of Içana
Cabiyarí
Curripaco
Piapoco
Tariana
Yucuna
Yavitero
Figure 1. Internal Classification of Arawakan Languages (adapted from Payne 1991:489)
4 Introduction
Although there are numerous Arawak word lists and transcriptions, and descriptive state-
ments about Arawak, some dating back to as early as 1598 (Brinton 1871:1), at the time of
writing no adequate description of Arawak was available in the literature. Available pub-
lished sources fall into two groups: outdated studies, and recent, but limited ones. This is
not to imply that either the older or the more recent studies were or are poorly done. The
older studies were as complete as the missionaries, anthropologists, and linguists of that
day could make them, given the state of linguistics (or philology) then and given the focus
of interest which the writers brought to their work. The more recent studies are limited
only because the scopes of the studies were explicitly very limited, or because the research
time was limited. In neither the older nor more recent studies did the investigators attempt
to relate their observations to phrase or sentence structure.
The best and most complete example of the older studies is de Goeje (1928). It deals with
some of the major lexical and morphological classes and discusses at length some interest-
ing observations about sound symbolism in the language. Although much of the classifica-
tion and analysis done in the book is outdated, the book contains a wealth of information
in its examples. Even here, however, one must exercise caution since examples are drawn
from no fewer than 66 works spanning two centuries, in addition to de Goeje’s own field-
work. Because de Goeje worked almost completely from published sources,2 and almost all
the authors of those sources were no longer living at the time he wrote, he was at a great
disadvantage when it came to assigning phonetic values to transcriptions and to determin-
ing glosses for many of the words and morphemes. This is reflected throughout his work
and leads to literally scores of errors such as overdifferentiating forms. For example, he
lists adi with a meaning of ‘upon (in an abstract sense)’ (p. 125) and a word aji with a
meaning of ‘more than’ (p. 126). However, these forms were transcribed by different
sources who apparently used different orthographies. As a matter of fact, these forms are
identical. Arawak palatalizes /d/ preceding /i/; thus, both forms are transcriptions of the
postposition [ad‚i] /adi/ ‘more than or above’. In addition to these transcription problems,
the mixing of Arawak from different times and sometimes from very different locations
(e.g. Trinidad, as well as Guyana and Suriname) often results in a confused picture.
More recent studies have been published primarily in the International Journal of Ameri-
can Linguistics by authors such as Nancy Hickerson and Douglas Taylor between 1953 and
1977 (see the bibliography). In addition, there exists an insightful article by van Renselaar
and Voorhoeve (1962). In all cases, the scope of these studies is very narrow. The authors
restricted themselves to dealing almost exclusively with individual aspects of phonology,
1See
sections on stative sentences (3.2.3) for exceptions.
2His
fieldwork in Suriname was limited to approximately two weeks “to clear up several doubtful points” (de
Goeje 1928:4).
1.4 Overview 5
1.3 Purpose
The purpose of this study is to provide a general sketch of the Arawak language as it is
spoken in Suriname, South America, and to do so with a broader scope than previous stud-
ies have. The hope is that this sketch will be of use to linguists in general, regardless of the
theoretical frameworks within which they work.
The coverage of Arawak syntax in the dissertation version of this study assumed the prin-
ciples of Government and Binding Theory (e.g. Chomsky 1982a, 1982b). In this present
version little reference is made to theoretical issues, except where particularly relevant.
1.4 Overview
Because of the already mentioned deficiencies in currently available sources for Arawak lan-
guage data, this study is based primarily on original data collected by me and compared with
previous works only as necessary. The data presented here were collected during periods of
residence in two Suriname villages, Powakka and Cassipora, from 1972 to 1978 and from
1981 to 1984, under the auspices of the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL International).
In accordance with the primarily descriptive nature of this study, the following chapters
are organized to present a bottom-up sketch of Arawak—starting with some comments on
Arawak phonology and ending with some comments about Arawak discourse. The bulk of
the description is in the area of syntax.
Chapter 2 consists of an overview of Arawak phonology and of lexical classes and mor-
phology. The phonological system is discussed only briefly since it is adequately covered
elsewhere (e.g. Taylor 1969; Pet 1979). The chapter presents a summary of the major lexi-
cal classes of the language, derivational systems, and various inflectional categories.
Chapter 3 consists primarily of a description of Arawak phrase and sentence syntax. Par-
ticular attention is paid to movement of question phrases, focused constituents, and rela-
tive pronouns to the left periphery of the clause. Such movement is clause-bounded and
leaves an associated gap. It also involves the obligatory insertion of what I call a “dummy
verb” in sentences when the verb or a manner adverbial is the questioned or otherwise
fronted constituent, but not when other constituents are fronted.
Chapter 4 continues the exposition of Arawak syntax by concentrating on the internal
structure of relative clauses and on the classes of constituents in a sentence which may be
relativized.
Chapter 5 returns to the consideration of some morphemes which cannot be adequately
described without reference to levels of the language above that of the sentence. In this
6 Introduction
chapter, the use and the meaning of the Arawak tense/aspect suffixes and tense particles
are investigated. Comrie (1976, 1985) is followed for the componential analysis of their
meaning, and narrative structure analysis (e.g. Longacre 1976, 1984; Grimes 1975; Hopper
1979) is used for additional insights into their use and meaning.
Chapter 6 is the conclusion. In it, I summarize the major findings and discuss some of the
limitations and inadequacies of the study.
Part 2 is a short lexicon of Suriname Arawak and an English-Arawak index. An appendix
with six interlinearized narrative texts follows. A bibliography concludes the volume.
Chapter 2
Phonology and Morphology
2.1 Phonology
2.1.1 Segmentals
There are seventeen consonants in Arawak if one includes the semivowels /w/, /¸/, and
/h/, and there are five vowels (see Figure 2). The language contrasts voiced and voiceless
unaspirated stops and voiceless aspirated stops, although the full three-way contrast is
found only among the apical consonants. The voiceless bilabial stop /p/ is found only in
obvious loan words from Spanish or Portuguese introduced into the language in the 1700s.
These loans are fully assimilated, and Arawaks are not conscious of the fact that these
words are in any way “foreign.”
The /º/ is a retroflexed apical flap (tip of the tongue slightly curled back and flipped for-
ward with a brief contact of the alveolar ridge) and contrasts with /»/, an apical tap or
trill.
There is considerable allophonic variation associated with some of the phonemes in Ara-
wak. These variations are summarized below. For details and examples, see Pet (1979),
Taylor (1969), and van Renselaar and Voorhoeve (1962).
The apical phonemes /t/, /th/, /d/, and /s/ strongly palatalize to the affricates [tš], [tš],
[d‚], and the grooved fricative [š], respectively, preceding /i/. For example: /dinth i/
[d‚ðntši] ‘uncle’, /siba/ [šiba] ‘stone’.
The aspirate/non-aspirate contrast among the voiceless stops is neutralized immediately pre-
ceding the phoneme /i/. This means there is no contrast between /k/ and /kh/ preceding /i/,
nor is there contrast between the palatalized allophones of /t/ and /th/ preceding /i/.
The phoneme /o/ is phonetically a rounded, mid- to high-back vocoid. Its high variants,
approaching [u], occur preceding a syllable containing an /i/. For example: /o»i/ [u»i]
‘snake’, /oni/ [uni] ‘rain’. Elsewhere, /o/ fluctuates between [o] and [u], with some ten-
dency to assimilate in height to the vowel of the following syllable.
7
8 Phonology and Morphology
CONSONANTS
BILABIAL APICAL VELAR
STOPS
VL ASP /th/ ‘th’ /kh/ ‘kh’
VL UNASP /p/ ‘p’ /t/ ‘t’ /k/ ‘k’
VD UNASP /b/ ‘b’ /d/ ‘d’
VL FRIC /ˆ/ ‘f’ /s/ ‘s’
LATERAL /l/ ‘l’
FLAP /º/ ‘lh’
TAP/TRILL /»/ ‘r’
NASAL /m/ ‘m’ /n/ ‘n’
SEMIVOWEL /w/ ‘w’ /¸/ ‘j’ /h/ ‘h’
VOWELS
FRONT BACK
HIGH /i/ ‘i’
/´/ ‘y’ /o/ ‘o’
/e/ ‘e’
LOW /a/ ‘a’
Note: Orthographic symbols corresponding to phonemes are in single quotation marks. Americanist phonetic
symbols are used.
The phoneme /´/ is phonetically an unrounded vocoid and fluctuates between central to
back and mid to high, with a tendency to assimilate in height to the vowel of the following
syllable. In terms of distinctive features (Figure 3), it appears to bear the same relationship
to the vocalic system that /o/ does, except that it is unrounded.
i e a ´ o
high + – – + +
front + + – – –
rounded – +
The only consonants which can occur syllable finally in Arawak are the nasal phones
[m], [n], and [‰]. These, however, do not contrast with each other in this position and are
therefore treated as instances of a single nasal /n/.1 This consonant is realized as strong na-
salization of a vowel (e.g. /dansika/ [dãšika] ‘I want’). If the vowel is followed by an oral
or nasal stop, the nasalization of the vowel is accompanied by a lenis nasal consonant,
homorganic with that stop (e.g. /danda/ [dãnda] ‘I arrive’, /wos´nbi¸a/ [wos¹mbia] ‘in or-
der that we go’, /bah´nka¸i/ [bah¹‰kai] ‘he is at home’). If /n/ occurs in pause-group-final
position, the nasalization of the vowel is accompanied by a velar nasal consonant (e.g.
/kak´thinon/ [kak´tšinõ‰] ‘people’).
1Elsewhere
(Pet 1979) I have analyzed this nasal as an “independent suprasegmental phoneme,” and Taylor
(1970) analyzed it in terms of a full set of nasalized vowels.
2.1 Phonology 9
The shape of a prefix is often obscured by vowel cluster reduction rules that apply when-
ever a prefix ending in a vowel is added to a stem beginning with a vowel.2
d. /´/ + V1 ® V1
(e.g. /l´/ + /osa/ becomes /losa/ ‘he goes’)
e. V1 + V1 ® V1
(e.g. /da-/ + /a»i/ becomes /da»i/ ‘my tooth’)
In all the above cases, the resulting vowel or diphthong becomes phonetically stressed or
lengthened, or both. In addition to the above combination rules, if a prefix ending in /´/ is
added to a consonant-initial stem, the /´/ of the prefix optionally assimilates to the vowel
in the first syllable of the stem:
2.1.3 Stress
1. Each pause group4 potentially has a stress that falls on the penultimate syllable of
that group. Secondary stresses fall on alternate syllables moving backward in the
pause group.
2. Each word potentially has a secondary stress which falls on the first syllable of its stem.
In natural speech, such as that heard in recorded conversations and stories, both rules
operate simultaneously in determining the actual position of stress, but pause-group stress
2These cluster reduction rules seem to apply only to prefixes. For example, adding the suffix /-¸i/ ‘he’ to the
stative verb /fonasi¸a-ka/ (be.hungry-PERF) yields /fonasi¸aka¸i/ ‘he is hungry’, not */fonasi¸ake/.
3See Pet (1979) for details and examples.
4A pause group is characterized by a juncture consisting of the following: a potential tense pause, sustained
pitch, and primary stress on the penultimate syllable. Although its boundaries are generally coterminous with
those of the phrase, it is a unit which expands and contracts depending on the speed of utterance. See Pet (1979)
for further details.
10 Phonology and Morphology
tends to be more prominent. In very precise speech of the sort a speaker uses when dictat-
ing for transcription or when correcting a linguist, word stress tends to predominate. In
this latter situation, word stress can give the effect of lexical contrast.
b. /D-aka-bo./ [dákabo]
I-speak-CONT
‘I am speaking.’
Notice, however, that this contrast is the result of adding a prefix which ends in a vowel to a
vowel-initial or consonant-initial stem. That is, when prefixes are added to stems beginning with
a vowel, word stress falls on the first syllable of the resulting word. When a prefix is added to a
stem starting with a consonant, word stress falls on the second syllable of the resulting word. All
lexical contrasts noted by investigators such as Taylor (1969) seem to be explainable in these
same terms, or as the result of the interaction between word- and pause-group stresses.
The Arawak examples in the remainder of this study are written in a simplified orthography
which is currently in use by Arawaks writing in their own language. In this orthography, y =
/´/, j = /¸/, th = /th/, kh = /kh/, lh = /º/, r = /»/, and f = /ˆ/. In its underlying form, any
combination of a vowel and o is divided by a /w/, and any combination of a vowel and i is di-
vided by a /¸/; however, these are not written in the simplified orthography.5
Throughout this study, morpheme boundaries relevant to the particular discussion at hand are in-
dicated by hyphens, and word juncture is indicated by space. In most cases, the morphemes are
matched on a one-to-one basis by a literal English gloss.6 When more than one English word is re-
quired to translate a single morpheme, those words are joined by a period. When the meaning of a
morpheme is unknown, that fact is indicated by two question marks (??).
Given appropriate affixes, it sometimes seems possible to use almost any root in Arawak
as any part of speech. However, uninflected roots generally seem to represent only one
part of speech; to be used as another part of speech, such a form must receive appropriate
derivational morphology. For example, an intransitive verb stem can be derived from many
nouns with the derivational suffix -da.7
(5) a. da-bode
my-fishhook
‘my fishhook’
5Although these combinations are pronounced as single syllables, they count as two syllables in the application
of stress rules. See Pet (1979) for further discussion.
6See list of abbreviations used in the glosses and elsewhere.
7See sections on derived nouns (2.3.4) and verbs (2.4.1.4, 2.4.2.2) for further examples and discussion of
derived forms.
2.3 Nominals 11
b. Da-bode-da-bo.
I-fishhook-NOUN.VERBALIZER-CONT
‘I am fishing with a line and hook.’
Arawak words may be divided into four classes based on the distribution of those words
in larger structures and based on internal inflectional differences. These classes are the fol-
lowing: nominals, verbs, postpositions, and functors.
1. Nominals are those words which, without accompanying words other than articles,
may serve as subject or object of a verb, or as object of a postposition. They may
be inflected for number but not for aspect or tense. For example: wadili and siba in
Li wadili dykha siba-be. (the man see stone-PL) ‘The man saw stones’.
2.Verbs are those words which, without accompanying words, may serve as predicate of a
clause.8 They may be inflected for aspect and tense but not for number. For example:
dalhida in Li wadili dalhida-bo. (the man run-PRES) ‘The man is running’. Verbs in Ara-
wak also include words expressing concepts which, in English, would be expressed by
adjectives. For example: firo in Firo-ka no. (big-PERF it) ‘It is big (e.g. the house)’.
3. Postpositions may not serve as the subject or object of a clause, and may not serve
as the predicate unless they are inflected with tense/aspect suffixes.9 Some exam-
ples of postpositions are the following: loko ‘inside of’, diako ‘on top of’, and oma
‘with (accompaniment)’.
4. Functors are those words which may not serve as predicate, subject, or object of a clause
and may not be inflected for number, tense, or aspect. This definition is a negative one
and is set up primarily for descriptive convenience. They do, however, share one feature:
none of them can receive any of the pronoun prefixes or suffixes (while nominals, verbs,
and postpositions all can). Functors are all members of closed subclasses such as articles,
conjunctions, and adverbials. For example: to ‘the’, ken ‘and’, hibin ‘already’.
2.3 Nominals
The nominals of Arawak may be subdivided into nouns and pronouns. Nouns, except
proper nouns, may receive a possessor prefix, while pronouns may not:
da-sikoa Adajali de
my-house ‘God’ ‘I’
‘my house’
The pronouns are discussed first since they exemplify in a clearer fashion some of the dis-
tinctions in number and gender that are also made among the nouns.
Arawak pronouns are differentiated as to gender, person, humanness, and number. There
are both personal and demonstrative pronominal forms. Grammatical case roles (e.g.
8Nouns phrases may also be used predicatively, but only in attributive (stative) sentences. See Section 3.2.3.1.
9See Section 2.5.1 for a discussion of the lexical status of postpositions and some reasons why they should be
considered as distinct from both verbs and nominals.
12 Phonology and Morphology
Personal pronouns (Figure 4) have morphologically free and bound variants, each of
which also has different forms depending on where it occurs in a clause or phrase.10 Thus,
personal pronouns potentially have four forms. (shown in Figure 4):11
1. a morphologically free form before a verb, a postposition, or a noun;
2. a morphologically bound form (prefix) before a verb, a postposition, or a noun;
3. a morphologically free form after a verb;
4. a morphologically bound form (suffix) after a verb.
The lexical meanings of corresponding variant forms of personal pronouns are all the
same, whether the forms are bound, free, pre-head, or post-head. The use of the bound ver-
sus the free forms is dependent on discourse considerations; they are not freely inter-
changeable. Informally stated, a bound pronoun tends to be used when its antecedent is
the last mentioned noun or pronoun having the same number and gender, whereas the
equivalent morphologically free pronoun tends to be used when its antecedent is not the
last mentioned pronoun or noun but has, nevertheless, already been introduced into that
section of the discourse. This tendency is even true within a single sentence. For example,
the possessive pronoun in (7a) is understood as being coreferential with the subject. The
possessive pronoun in (7b) is usually understood as not being coreferential.
10De Goeje (1928), Hickerson (1953), and Taylor (1969) give slightly different spellings for several of the forms
and include some additional ones. In the case of de Goeje’s data, this is understandable, given the date and
locations from which he obtained them (see discussion in Chapter 1). In the cases of Hickerson and Taylor, it is
unclear to me whether the differences are due to dialect differences or to the fact that both Hickerson and Taylor
depended partially on de Goeje’s data.
11The shape of prefix pronouns is often obscured by vowel cluster reduction rules. See Section 2.1.2.
2.3 Nominals 13
The following are some examples illustrating the various forms of the personal pronouns:12
As mentioned above, Arawak distinguishes its third person pronouns according to three fea-
tures: [+/– human], [+/– male], and [+/– plural]. If one examines the data in Figure 4, one
can see that these three features interact. For example, all non-humans, regardless of gender or
number, are referred to by tho. This same pronoun is also used for singular human females.
The relationship of the number and gender features relevant to the third-person pronouns is
summarized in Figure 5.
3RD PERSON
HUMAN + –
PLURAL + –
MALE + –
ne li tho
‘they’ ‘he’ ‘she,it,they’
Figure 5. Arawak Number and Gender Features
12The forms tho, thy-, no, and -n, in the examples, can all just as well be translated as ‘it’, ‘they’, or ‘them’ since
they refer to a non-human referent.
14 Phonology and Morphology
Simply knowing the features associated with the pronouns is not sufficient to allow one
to choose the correct pronoun for a particular referent. The problem lies in the fact that,
for Arawak, humanness and maleness are not completely biologically based. The pronouns
do not necessarily reflect whether or not a referent is human or male in an objective sense;
instead, they sometimes reflect the speaker’s feelings toward that referent. This is most true
of the feature [+/– human]. In general, referents are [+human] if they are Arawak, and
they are [–human] if they are not Arawak.13 However, speakers who feel a unity with other
indigenous groups extend the use of [+human] to members of all such groups. It can be
further extended to include close friends in other races if both the speaker and hearer feel
an affinity to them. In a similar but lesser manner, [+/– male] is influenced by a speaker’s
feelings toward a referent. Cute, small, female infants and some animals are also
sometimes regarded as having the feature [+male].
Applying the above specifically to Arawak third-person pronouns, one tends to find the
third-person singular masculine human forms used for:
1. All males of the speaker’s ethnic group, except if special disdain is intended.
2. Males who are not of the speaker’s ethnic group, if they are friends of the speaker
or if a relationship of mutual respect exists between the speaker and referent.
3. Small, human infants (either male or female, from the speaker’s group or not), if
there is no emphasis on gender intended and they are “cute.”
4. Animals (e.g. hikolhi ‘turtle’), objects (e.g. adali ‘sun’), and spiritual beings (e.g.
Adajali ‘God’) considered to be good or desirable, or when they are protagonists in
stories.
The third-person singular non-masculine forms tend to be used for:
1. All females except, sometimes, infants.
2. Males who are not of the speaker’s ethnic group (except as provided for in point 2,
above).
3. All animals, objects, and spiritual beings (except those provided for in 4, above).
4. The plurals of male humans who are not of the speaker’s group and the plurals of
animals, objects, and spiritual beings.
The third-person human plural is used only for male and female humans who are Arawaks
or with whom the speaker is in sympathy. In all other cases, plural human referents are re-
ferred to by the same forms as the third-person singular non-masculine referents (see above).
Arawak demonstrative pronouns, articles, and demonstrative adjectives14 are closely related
to the personal pronouns in both form and meaning; however, they occur only in the third per-
son. Like the personal pronouns, they are differentiated according to the number, gender, and
humanness features mentioned in the previous section. They are further differentiated
13This classification is also reflected in the nouns. Arawak has no generic root word for ‘human’, as English
does. The closest word to this is loko(no) ‘Arawak person’ (often extended to mean ‘indigenous person’). Other
races are referred to by other specific words (e.g. falhetho ‘white man’, dolhi ‘negro’). Two words, wadili ‘male’
and hiaro ‘female’, are often used in Arawak under circumstances where an English speaker would use ‘man’ and
‘woman’. However, these refer only to the sex of the referent, since they can equally well be used for animals. One
other word, kakythinon ‘people’, is now commonly used for groups of people. However, the singular of this word
is, again, specific for the gender of the referent: kakythi ‘man’, kakytho ‘woman’ or ‘living being’.
14Articles and demonstrative adjectives are not nominals, they are identical in form and similar in meaning to
according to the referent’s physical or psychological distance from the speaker and the amount
of “pointing” or “singling out” the speaker intends. Their forms may be found in Figure 6.
A B C D E
1. to toho tora toraha torabo
the this that that that there
The uses of the singular non-masculine, the singular human masculine, the singular or
plural non-human, and the plural human forms are the same as those given for the per-
sonal pronouns.
As implied by their names, the articles and demonstrative adjectives modify nouns in
noun phrases, while the demonstrative pronouns are generally used in place of nouns. The
articles and demonstrative adjectives are mutually exclusive. That is, a noun may be modi-
fied by either an article or a demonstrative adjective (or neither), but not by both. Neither
personal nor demonstrative pronouns may be modified by articles or demonstrative adjec-
tives. Some examples using articles and demonstrative pronouns and adjectives follow:
(9) a. li da-rethi
the my-husband
‘the husband of mine’
b. to kodibio
the bird
‘the bird’
c. tora da-bianthe
that.non-masc. my-spouse
‘that (female) spouse of mine’
16 Phonology and Morphology
d. Lira-bo osa-bo.
that.male-there go-CONT
‘That (male) there is going.’
e. Ama to toho?
what be this
‘What is this?’
2.3.3 Nouns
Nouns are an open lexical class and represent the largest group of Arawak nominals.
They may be divided into two large classes: alienable and inalienable nouns. Cross-cutting
these classes are several other categorizations.
Whether a noun is inalienable or alienable has to do with its behavior when it is possessed.
Some nouns must receive a suffix to be unpossessed, while others must receive a suffix to be
possessed. The former are called inalienable, and the latter are called alienable. For example,
note the use of the ‘noun generalizer’ (NGEN) and ‘possessed’ (POSS) suffixes in the following:
de dyna dyna-ha
my arm arm-NGEN
‘my arm’ ‘arm’
b. Alienable Noun:
de arakabosa-n arakabosa
my gun-POSS gun
‘my gun’ ‘gun’
What is meant by ‘possessed’ in the above is that a pronoun or noun expressing ownership,
or one referring to a whole of which the noun is a part, is present in the same noun phrase (see
Section 3.1). It does not have to do with definiteness or the presence of other modifiers.
As might be expected, inalienable nouns tend to be nouns which are most commonly
used in contexts where they would be possessed. They include most body parts or other
parts of a whole, most kinship terms, and a few other words which do not seem to fall into
any one easily-definable semantic category. With the exception of most kinship terms, in-
alienable nouns can only be used in an unpossessed sense if they have the “noun
generalizer” suffix -hV15 (where V is identical with the last vowel of the preceding
15This suffix may be the same as the recurring partial which occurs in some of the demonstrative pronouns
listed in Figure 6.
2.3 Nominals 17
syllable). If a noun has the noun generalizer suffix, it is taken in a very abstract or general
sense, not referring to any specific object or entity which exists or has existed or will exist.
Kinship terms, other than special vocative forms, are never used without an expressed possessor.16
Some additional examples of inalienable nouns are the following:17
Alienable nouns represent the majority of nouns. When they are possessed, in addition to be-
ing preceded by a possessor pronoun (either morphologically bound or free) or a noun, they
receive one of the possession (POSS) suffixes, -n, -ja, or -ra.18 When they are unpossessed, they
may be used without any morphological modification. Although which suffix to use seems to
depend to some extent on the last syllable of the stem (e.g. words ending in i tend to receive
-ja) and to some extent on their origin (e.g. many loan words receive -ja), there are many ex-
ceptions, and thus it seems best to posit three arbitrary subclasses for them. In terms of fre-
quency, most nouns receive the -n suffix. Some examples of alienable nouns are as follows:
b. ada d-ada-n
‘tree/wood’ ‘my tree/wood’
c. karobo wa-karobo-n
‘plate’ ‘our plate’
d. arakabosa de arakabosa-n
‘gun’ ‘my gun’
e. kalhao da-kalhao-ja
‘grass’ ‘my grass’
16See Hickerson (1953), van Renselaar and Voorhoeve (1962), and de Goeje (1928) for descriptions of the
Arawak kinship system.
17An asterisk before an example or other cited form indicates that the form is ungrammatical or unacceptable
Arawak. It should be understood that since I am not a native speaker of Arawak, some forms may be marked as
ungrammatical when they may not actually be so.
18Note that -ja is written a when added to a word ending in i.
18 Phonology and Morphology
g. malhisi hi malhisi-a
‘corn’ ‘your (pl.) corn’
i. adisa d-adisa-ra
‘grating boat’ ‘my grating boat’
As is the case with pronouns (see Section 2.3.1.2 on pronoun gender), the features as-
signed to the noun to some extent have to do with the speaker’s view of the referent of that
noun. For example, although wadili ‘male’ is usually used when referring to a man and
therefore usually occurs with the masculine singular article li, it can also occur with the
non-masculine or non-human article to when referring to a non-Arawak.
As was indicated in the discussion of the third-person pronoun features (Figure 5), the fea-
ture [+/– plural] is overtly indicated for pronouns only when the pronoun has the feature
[+human]. This is true also of the nouns.19 Nouns referring to humans (in the Arawak sense)
are intrinsically singular, and if they are used to refer to more than one person, they must be
pluralized with a pluralizing suffix. For example, if the following nouns refer to an Arawak
(therefore [+human]) referent, the singular forms cannot refer to more than one person:
19See also Taylor (1976). In addition to the two pluralizing suffixes I mention, he lists (p. 373) an additional
suffix -kho about which he says, “my examples of its use suffice only to suggest that it may refer to a ‘set’ or
collectivity rather than a plurality of persons or things: iborokho ‘little ones’...” This -kho morpheme also occurs a
few times in my data; however, it sometimes occurs when neither ‘collectivity’ nor plurality seems to be involved.
For example, I have recorded several instances where -kho is added to the pronoun de ‘I’, and to the conjunction
ken ‘and’. The only thing that all instances of -kho have in common is that they all seem to have to do with contrast
or emphasis. Instances of dekho occurred in contrastive situations in which the author seemed to be saying: ‘I, not
someone else’. The only occurrences of kenkho I have recorded are at, or just before, the climax of a narrative (e.g.
in the Bomb Story in the appendix). It may be that this suffix is related to the homophonous, negative adverbial
particle kho ‘not’.
2.3 Nominals 19
In contrast to the above, and like the third-person pronoun tho, [–human] nouns may re-
fer to either plural or singular referents. Their exact interpretation often depends on the
context in which they are found. For example, the following nouns refer to [–human] refer-
ents, and they may be plural even without an overt pluralizing suffix:
As can be gleaned from the human and non-human examples above, Arawak has two
pluralizing suffixes: -non and -be. The suffix -non is only used with [+human] referents.
The suffix -be is used with both [+human] and [–human] referents. Thus it is also possible
to say:
As a matter of fact, both -non and -be can be used together on the same [+human]
noun—and in either order.
As with [–human] referents, when -be is used with [+human} referents, it seems to add
the implication that a diverse group is involved. Thus, the above forms for ‘women’ with
the suffix -be would be appropriate to use when the women referred to are of different ages
or from different villages.
b. da-khabo loko
my-hand in
‘in my hand (e.g. the thorn inside the flesh of my hand)’
c. to kodo loko
the gourd in
‘inside the gourd (e.g. referring to what is contained in the gourd),
b. da-khabo roko
my-hand in
‘in my hand (e.g. referring to what I am holding in my hand)’
b. de koborokon
me in
‘in me (e.g. a pain in my body)’
c. ne koborokon
them among
‘among them (e.g. the location of a person)’
b. to iniabo rakon
the water in
‘in the water (e.g. referring to the wash)’
20Only examples for ‘in’ are illustrated here. Corresponding forms for ‘into’ and ‘from’ are derived by adding
the suffixes -nro ‘toward’ and -ria ‘from’ to the postpositions. See also Section 2.5.
2.3 Nominals 21
b. ikhi-hi kolokon
fire-NGEN in
‘in (the) fire (e.g. referring to the pot)’
c. hadali kolokon
sun in
‘in the sunshine (e.g. referring to walking)’
Arawak has at its disposal a number of ways by which it can derive nouns and noun
phrases from other categories in the language.
An instrumental noun or noun phrase may be derived from an event verb21 with the suffix -koana
‘an instrument or device with which’ (glossed below and elsewhere as ‘THING’). The resulting de-
rived noun is always something with which the action of the verb can be accomplished.
(25) a. falhetho-dalhidi-koana
white.man-run-THING
‘bus’
b. da-dalhidi-koana
my-run-THING
‘my car’
c. bylhyty-koana
make.marks-THING
‘pen/pencil’
The suffix -bero may be added to almost any stative verb22 which describes or ascribes an
attribute. The result is a [–human] noun having that attribute.
(26) a. firo-bero
big-THING
‘big thing/tapir’
b. bithi-ka-kothi-bero
four-ATTRIB-foot-THING
‘car/bus’
21See Section 2.4.1 for a discussion of event verbs.
22Concepts which in English are expressed by means of adjectives are expressed with stative verbs in Arawak
(e.g. firo ‘be big’). Stative verbs may be derived from nouns with the ka- ‘attributive’ and ma- ‘privative’ prefixes.
See Section 2.4.2.
22 Phonology and Morphology
The suffix -lhin ‘he who habitually does’ may be added to the “a-stem”23 of an event verb
to derive a noun with a habitual-agent meaning or a noun which expresses a person’s pro-
fession. For example, applying this suffix to the intransitive a-stems of the transitive verbs
boratyn ‘to help, and jokaryn ‘to sell’ yields:
The suffixes -li and -ro may be added to quantifiers in order to derive singular [+male
+human] nouns and singular [–male +human] or [–human] nouns, respectively. The suf-
fixes -ninon (or -non if the word ends in a vowel) and -be may be added in order to derive
plural [+human] and plural [–human] nouns, respectively.24
2.3.4.5 Verb + -n
Verbs may be nominalized with the suffix -n, yielding the equivalent of an English ger-
und or infinitive.
The suffixes -thi or -tho (WH.SUBJ) may be added to event and stative verbs to create rela-
tive clauses. These suffixes function syntactically to indicate that the subject of the verb to
which they are attached has been relativized. The suffix -thi is used for [+male +human] sub-
jects, and -tho is used for [–male +human] or [–human] subjects. (Number is insignificant.)
The relative clauses formed by the addition of these suffixes (-thi and -tho) sometimes oc-
cur as free relative clauses.25 When a free relative clause consists of a single word, it takes
on the character of a noun, where the noun expresses the subject (not necessarily the
agent) of the verb.
There seems to be an on-going process in the language whereby short, free relative
clauses such as the above become conventionalized and, apparently, are added to the lexi-
con as nouns. When this happens, it becomes possible to pluralize the resulting noun with
the noun pluralizing suffixes already mentioned.
An extreme example of this process may be many of the Arawak kinship terms. Most of
the [–male] Arawak kinship terms end with -tho and most of the [+male] ones end with
-thi, yet no speaker today is able to give meanings for the root forms. The following is but a
small sample:26
In addition to the subject-relativizing suffixes (-thi and -tho), Arawak also has a suffix
which indicates a relativized direct object: -sia ‘WH.OBJ’. Since relativizing the object still
leaves the subject of a clause in place, the -sia suffix does not occur in single-word free rel-
ative clauses. Nevertheless, it does enter into the derivation of some nouns:
In spite of the fact that many nouns are transparently combinations of verbs with one of
the above relativization suffixes, these suffixes are relativizers and not nominalizers. They
25See Section 4.2 for a the discussion of free relative clauses.
26See also Hickerson (1953), van Renselaar and Voorhoeve (1962), and de Goeje (1928).
24 Phonology and Morphology
form relative clauses, and only some of these relative clauses have become conventional-
ized sufficiently to be used as lexical nouns. For example, although ythysia means ‘bever-
age’, adding -sia to sikin ‘to give’ does not yield *sikisia ‘gift’.
Not all derived nouns are simple. Many nouns go through a number of steps before reaching their
final forms. For example, the attributive prefix ka- ‘to have, to be’ may be added to the noun sikoa
‘house’ to derive from it a stative verb kasikoa meaning ‘to be with house’. This word can, in turn,
receive the nominalizing suffix -li ‘he who’ to yield the word kasikoali ‘he who is with house’ (i.e.
‘owner’). Similarly, the verb ythyn ‘to drink’ can receive the object-relativizing suffix -sia, yielding
ythysia ‘that which is drunk, beverage’. This derived noun can then receive ka- ‘attributive’, giving
kathysia ‘to be with drink’, and can then receive the human nominalizer -non, giving kathysianon
‘they who are with drink’ (i.e. ‘mildly drunk people’).
2.4 Verbs
Arawak verbs may be divided into two large classes based on their semantics and the
structures in which they occur: event verbs and stative (or non-event) verbs. This latter
group consists primarily of words expressing concepts which, in English, would be ex-
pressed by adjectives.
b. Stative verb:
Fonasia-ka no.
be.hungry-PERF she
‘She is hungry.’
In addition to the verbs in the two major verb classes, Arawak has a copular verb and a se-
mantically empty dummy verb which functions somewhat like AUX in English.27
Event verbs in Arawak are those words which indicate that some event is, was, or will be
happening. They indicate a physical or mental process or action and are found in Subject-
Verb-Object (SVO) and Subject-Verb (SV) sentences.
Almost all event verbs have a “basic-stem” form and an “a-stem” form (so-named for
the a in its final syllable). Semantically, these stem forms differ from each other with
respect to aspect, and often also with respect to voice. Transitive verbs usually also
27See also Sections 2.4.3, 3.2.2, and 3.2.3.
2.4 Verbs 25
have a third stem form, an “oa-stem,” which seems to be an agentless passive and also
functions as a reflexive.28
The “basic-stem” forms of verbs all have an e, i, o, or y (but not29 a) as the nucleus of
their last syllable. They are here named “basic” because the specific vowel found in their
last syllable is unpredictable and because they are the forms from which the other stem
forms are derived. The “a-stem,” as its name implies, has an a as the nucleus of its final syl-
lable. In most, if not all, cases it can be derived from the basic-stem form by replacing the
vowel of the final syllable of a basic-stem with an a.
As can be seen in the preceding examples, the basic-stem and a-stem forms consistently
differ in how they present the action of the verb: whether they present an action as what
might be called “bounded” or “unbounded” in time. That is, the basic-stem forms view an
action as happening at some specifiable point or range in time and as having a starting or
ending point, or both. The a-stem forms, on the other hand, emphasize the action of the
verb itself as an event with duration, and neither the start nor the terminus of the action
seems to be in focus.
The preceding examples of the basic-stem and a-stem forms were all of intransitive verbs.
However, transitive verbs also have these stem forms. For example, notice the following
pairs of sentences:30
28This oa-stem seems to bears a certain resemblance to the Greek “middle” voice which also seems to have both
a passive and a reflexive interpretation (see Lyons 1968:375ff). See also Taylor (1970a:210ff.) for further
discussion of the three Arawak stem forms.
29A number of verbs at first appeared to have only a-stems. In most cases, further investigation yielded
basic-stem forms not ending in a.
30These sentences are presented in the future tense because the phonological difference between the basic- and
a-stem forms is most clearly seen in this tense. The tense suffixes in Arawak all also contain an aspect component
in their meaning (see Chapter 5 on discourse). This interacts with the stem forms such that the difference between
the stem forms is often neutralized (see discussion in following paragraphs).
26 Phonology and Morphology
b. Li fara-fa.
he fight-FUT
‘He will fight.’
(36) a. Thy-simaky-fa-i.
she-call-FUT-him
‘She will call him.’
b. Thy-simaka-fa.
she-yell-FUT
‘She will yell/scream.’
b. Na-mithada-fa.
they-laugh-FUT
‘They will laugh.’
b. To hiaro kanaba-fa.
the woman listen-FUT
‘The woman will listen.’
31There are some apparent exceptions to this, as is also noted by Taylor (1970:202). One is the potentially
ditransitive verb sikin ‘to give/put’ which becomes just transitive.
Da-siki-fa no thy-myn.
I-give-FUT it her-to
‘I will give it to her’
Da-sika-fa no bahy-nro.
I-bring/take-FUT her home-toward
‘I will take her home.’
Other exceptions seem to occur in dummy verb sentences (see section 3.2.2).
If the noun phrase corresponding to the direct object in the basic-stem form needs to be
mentioned, it must usually be done in the form of a postpositional phrase. When this noun
phrase is a co-participant in the action of the verb, the postposition oma ‘with (accompani-
ment)’ is used. When it is not a co-participant, usually khonan ‘about/on/of’ is used.
b. Na-mithada-fa da-khonan.
they-laugh-FUT me-about/on
‘They will laugh about me.’
However, these postpositional phrases can be used with nearly any event verb, regardless
of its stem type. They are not restricted to a-stem forms.
This seems to indicate that the a-stems of transitive verbs are really intransitive.32 The
only mechanism available by which to add another NP into an a-stem clause is the
same means by which one is added to other intransitive clauses—namely, by using it
in a postpositional phrase.
As already mentioned, one of the characteristics of the a-stem is that the actions it ex-
presses seem to be less bounded and more general. One additional characteristic is that the
a-stem form of some basic-stem forms can take on an iterative meaning. This is particularly
true of actions which cannot be easily viewed as stretched in time, such as ‘hit’.
32If one accepts Foley and Van Valin’s language typology (1984:107ff.), Arawak is a Pragmatic-Pivot language.
This can be demonstrated by the fact that the choice of which NP is the subject of a clause is not strictly
determined by the semantic case role of that NP. The intransitivizing effect seen in a-stems then seems to be
similar to Foley and Van Valin’s (pp.168ff.) notion of “backgrounding antipassives [which] put the undergoer
outside the core” (p. 173). That is, just as a passive demotes the subject (usually agent) of a clause to a peripheral
role, an antipassive demotes the object (usually undergoer). Although antipassives are often associated with
ergative languages, Arawak is an accusative language. Nevertheless other accusative languages also have been
shown to have antipassives (e.g. Foley and Van Valin mention (pp. 173ff.) Tzotzil).
28 Phonology and Morphology
Although the meaning correspondence between basic-stem and a-stem forms is usually
predictable, some a-stems differ considerably from their basic-stem counterparts.
As its name implies, an “oa-stem” ends in oa. Verbs consisting of a single syllable derive
this form by adding -noa. Verbs having two or more syllables in their stem may either re-
place the vowel of the final syllable with -oa or add -noa. No difference in meaning has
been found between the oa-stem forms using -noa or -oa.33 Oa-stems can be derived only
from transitive verbs, and function in Arawak both as passives and as reflexives (or
middles).
In each of the above sentences, the NP which is subject would have been direct object if
that sentence had had a basic-stem form verb.34 This is very much like the English passive.
For Arawak, however, the NP which would be in subject position if the clause had a basic-
stem form verb is completely outside the picture, and cannot be brought back in except in
a very indirect fashion. Thus in example (47b) below, doma ‘because’ conveys no specific
information as to the semantic relationship (e.g. agent) between the NP with which it is as-
sociated and the verb of the sentence.
b. Li doma da-fatadoa.
him because I-got.hit
‘Because of him I got hit.’ or
‘Because of him I hit myself.’
c. Ly-dykhonoa.
he-appear
‘He appeared.’
‘He was seen.’
*‘He saw himself.’
d. Thy-kanaboa.
she-get.heard
‘she was heard.’
*‘She heard herself.’
Although the passive interpretation is possible for all sentences with oa-stem forms, the
reflexive one is not. For example, the oa-stem forms of dykhyn ‘to see’ (47c) and kanabyn
‘to hear’ (47d) have only the passive reading, and not the reflexive one. If the reflexive
reading is desired, it can only be obtained by circumlocution or paraphrase.
b. Thy-kanaba thy-kanakyn.
she-hear her-sound
‘She heard herself.’
The unavailability of the reflexive reading for sentences using kanaboan ‘to be heard’ and dykoan
‘to be seen’ seems to have to do with the fact that the direct objects of their basic-stem forms are not
affected by the action of the verb. Semantically, the direct object of most transitive verbs is the re-
cipient or patient35 of the action of the verb. However, the direct object of ‘to hear’ or ‘to see’ does
not participate in the action of the verb at all—either as patient or agent. In Grimes’ (1975) and
Longacre’s (1976) terms, it has more the role of “range.” This non-involvement seems to preclude
the reflexive reading when such noun phrases are made the subject of a sentence.
Arawak currently seems to be under pressure from surrounding languages to replace the use
of oa-stems to express the reflexive. Many younger people do not use the oa-stem at all for the
reflexive, but instead apply the suffix -waja ‘by.self’ or ‘alone’ to a direct object pronoun.
This use of waja to create a reflexive pronoun follows the pattern of Dutch, the national
language of Suriname, and also the pattern of Sranan Tongo, a creole language almost all
Arawaks in Suriname know and use daily. However, older speakers totally reject reflexive
constructions of this sort. They insist the above sentence means:
35Grimes (1975:116ff.); Longacre (1976:28).
30 Phonology and Morphology
(50) ‘He is chopping by himself (i.e. he is chopping open a new planting ground by himself).’
The morphological differences between the three stem forms of event verbs is not mani-
fested in many of their occurrences. In particular, the difference between the basic and
a-stem forms is manifested only when the stem immediately precedes the following suf-
fixes:36 -n ‘SUB’, -thi ‘WH.SUBJ’, -tho ‘WH.SUBJ’, -sia ‘WH.OBJ’, -fa ‘FUT’, and -(n)bia
‘INCH’. In all other circumstances, the basic-stem form also appears with an a. For exam-
ple, the morphological difference between simakyn ‘to call (someone)’ and simakan ‘to yell
or cry out’ is lost when the present continuative suffix -bo is added. Thus one finds:
b. Da-simaka-bo.
I-yell-CONT
‘I am yelling.’
Here the difference between “yell” and “call” must be obtained from the context—in this
case, the presence of an object (which is obligatory for transitive verbs).
Similarly, the difference between the a-stem form and the oa-stem form is lost preceding the
future suffix -fa (-ha in some dialects). Thus, tho-boko-fa in isolation can mean either ‘she will
cook (i.e. make a meal)’ or ‘it will boil’. Context, however, can disambiguate the meanings:
Event verbs can be divided into two major subclasses: transitive verbs and intransitive
verbs. Transitive verbs have obligatory surface objects when they are used in clauses, while
intransitive ones do not.37 Thus, andyn ‘to arrive’ is an intransitive verb, while kanabyn ‘to
hear’ is transitive. There are also verbs such as ‘give’, which seem to be ditransitive (i.e.
they can have a direct and an indirect object). The indirect object of such a verb is optional
in surface structure. If it is expressed, it is in the form of a benefactive postpositional
phrase with the postposition myn.
b. Da-siki-fa no ly-myn.
I-give-FUT it him-BEN
‘I will give it to him.’
36See Section 2.4.1.3 for a discussion of event verb suffixes.
37Sentence syntax is discussed in Chapter 3.
2.4 Verbs 31
The benefactive phrase of a ditransitive verb is somehow more central to the meaning of
the sentence than a benefactive that can occur with other verbs.38 Furthermore, the more
usual benefactive phrase can co-occur with the indirect object one. When this happens, the
benefactive phrase which is not the indirect object follows the indirect object one:
The total Arawak event verb word is composed of the verb stem (either simple or derived) and its
affixes. There is one prefix position preceding the stem, and there are eight suffix positions follow-
ing it. The affixes and their order relative to the verb stem may be found in Figure 7. Numbers rep-
resent position classes. A negative numbered class is a prefix; positive ones are suffixes. Absolute
value indicates distance from stem. Affixes in the same order class cannot co-occur. Other co-
occurrence restrictions are discussed in the text.
–1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8
pron stem -n -thi -ra -ma -bo -ba -the pron
SUB WH.S EXPECT HABIL CONT AWAY COME
-tho -na -thi -ka
WH.S UNEXP DESID PERF
-sia -li -fa
WH.O NESS FUT
-ja
PAST.CONT
-(n)bia
INCH
-›
PAST
38See Section 4.4.4.2 for a discussion of relativization where postposition stranding facts seem to indicate the
indirect object is also syntactically more closely bound to the verb than other benefactive postpositional phrases.
32 Phonology and Morphology
At the peripheries of the event verb word (order classes –1 and +8) are the personal
pronoun prefixes and suffixes which were previously discussed. A morphologically bound
pronoun occurring in position –1 of an event verb is the subject of that verb; one occurring
in position +8 is the direct object (of course intransitive verbs cannot take a direct ob-
ject).39 Order classes +1 to +7 consist of various aspect, mood, and directional suffixes. A
brief discussion of each order class and the suffixes in it follows.
In the first position, +1, following the stem, only the suffix -n occurs. It is the subordi-
nating morpheme (SUB), used whenever a verb is in a subordinate clause, and can co-occur
with any of the other suffixes. For example:
The suffix -n, if it is the only affix on a verb, yields the verb’s citation form—that is, the
form used by Arawaks to talk about a particular verb. It is roughly equivalent to an English
gerund or infinitive. For example:
The second position after the verb stem consists of three relativizing suffixes -thi, -tho,
and -sia, one of which must be used whenever an event verb’s subject or direct object has
been relativized.
The relativization suffixes are discussed in some detail in other sections of this study (see
Chapter 4 on relative clauses), and consequently are not dealt with further here.
The third order position after the stem consists of two suffixes having to do with expectancy:
The suffix -ra added to the verb indicates that the action or event described is somehow expected
because of the preceding linguistic context or the situational context. Thus, a man who had previously
asked if he could go to a party with a neighbor meets that neighbor again when that neighbor stops by
to pick him up. The neighbor asks the man whether he is going to the party, and the man answers:
(59) D-osy-ra-fa.
I-go-EXPECT-FUT
‘(Of course) I will go’.
The suffix -na is the opposite of -ra. It indicates that the action or event is unexpected. Thus,
in a story about playing with an unexploded bomb that later explodes, the story teller says:
The fourth order class after the stem consists of three suffixes which have to do with de-
sire, potentiality or ability, and necessity:
The suffix -ma ‘habilitative’ is used to express potentiality in the sense of either ability or
permission. Thus,
is similar to its English gloss and can mean either ‘she is able to eat it’ or ‘she is allowed to
eat it’. In contexts where the distinction between the two is important and only the ‘ability’
interpretation is desired, the verb wadilin ‘to be able to’ is used.
The suffix -thi ‘desiderative’ indicates desire or intention.
34 Phonology and Morphology
(63) B-osa-thi-ka.
you-go-DESID-PERF
‘Do you want/intend to go?’
This suffix is never found without one of the tense/aspect suffixes in the next order class.
The suffix -li ‘necessitative’ indicates obligation or necessity. This suffix not only does not
co-occur with the habilitative or desiderative suffixes but also does not co-occur with the
tense/aspect suffixes of the next class, +5. This may be because the meaning of this suffix
seems to have a temporally forward-looking component.
The suffix -li leaves some doubt as to the outcome of the situation. If certainty of the out-
come (as in the English ‘must’) needs to be expressed, the future suffix -fa must be used
(see the discussion below).
The fifth position after the stem consists of five tense/aspect suffixes. In addition, the ab-
sence of all of these suffixes has its own meaning, normally past. However, the past tense
interpretation, when none of the five tense/aspect suffixes is present, does not occur when
-li ‘necessitative’ or -ma ‘habilitative’ are present.
The suffixes in this class are analyzed in more detail in Chapter 5 and consequently are dealt
with only briefly here. The meanings in (65) for the suffixes apply to their use in isolated utter-
ances. They all represent combinations of tense and aspect, and the tense component of their
meanings is actually what Comrie (1985) calls “relative tense” (see Chapter 5). This implies
that their temporal reference is affected by the discourse context in which they are found.
The suffix -bo ‘present continuative’ indicates a continuing or progressing action—
normally in the present.
b. Ly-dalhida-ra-bo-the.
he-run-EXPECT-CONT-BACK
‘He is running back (of course).’
2.4 Verbs 35
The suffix -ka ‘perfect’ is used to indicate a completed action where the effects of that ac-
tion extend into the present. For example, if one says
(67) Da-sokosa-ka.
I-wash.clothes-PERF
‘I have washed the clothes.’
then the clothes have been washed and are now clean. Similarly, the question
(68) By-ka-ka?
you-bathe-PERF
‘Did you bathe?’ or ‘Have you bathed?’
not only asks whether a bath has been taken, but also asks whether its effects are still pres-
ent. Thus the question could not be answered in the affirmative if one has bathed but is
now dirty again.
The future suffix -fa (-ha in some dialects) generally indicates future certainty.
(69) a. L-osy-fa.
he-go-FUT
‘He will go.’
b. Lo-khota-thi-fa.
he-eat-DESID-FUT
‘He will want to eat.’
When this suffix is used in an imperative sentence,40 it is best translated by the English
word ‘must.’
(70) B-osy-fa!
you-go-FUT
‘You must go!’
The suffix -ja ‘past continuative’ is used to express events which had a duration in the
past. The action expressed by the verb is not on-going in the present and the hearer does
not know if the event ran to completion.
(71) Tho-boka-ja.
she-cook-PAST.CONT
‘She was cooking (a meal).’
The suffix -(n)bia ‘inchoative’ generally indicates that a change of state has begun or will
begin.
This suffix is also used where ‘in order to’ would be used in English.
When the inchoative is added to the basic-stem form of a verb, which is the case in ex-
ample (72), it always has the form -nbia. When it is used on an a-stem, as in (73), the n is
often dropped, and the suffix is just -bia. The precise explanation for the dropping of the n
has not been determined.
If a verb in an isolated utterance does not have one of the five aspect/tense suffixes men-
tioned in this section, nor -li ‘necessitative’ nor -ma ‘habilitative’, it is always taken to be
equivalent to the simple past tense.
(74) a. D-osa.
I-go
‘I went.’
As might be expected if the lack of a tense/aspect suffix is a “significant zero” with a past
tense meaning, this -› is unacceptable with a future time adverbial.
The sixth and seventh order positions after the stem consist of two directional suffixes:
The suffix -ba (in the +6 position) indicates that the action of the verb involves physical
or psychological motion away from the speaker’s reference point (i.e. away from the
speaker at the moment of the utterance, or away from his habitual place or state, or away
from where he should be). Thus,
(77) L-osa-ba
he-go-AWAY
‘He went away.’
2.4 Verbs 37
The suffix -the (in the +7 position) is the converse of the preceding suffix and therefore
indicates physical or psychological motion toward the speaker’s reference point:
As might be inferred from the fact that the directional suffixes are listed in different or-
der classes, these suffixes can co-occur, and when they co-occur, they do so in a specific or-
der: -ba-the. Thus, it is possible to say:
(79) L-osa-ba-the.
he-go-AWAY-BACK
‘He went and came back.’
In the following sections several ways of deriving event verb stems from various lexical
classes are discussed.
Causative event verb stems may be derived from event verbs with the causative (CAUS)
suffix -kyty (where the first y becomes o if the vowel in the preceding syllable is a). These
derived verbs are always transitive. When they are derived from originally transitive verbs,
the causer of the action replaces the normal agent of the verb, and this original agent can-
not be re-introduced into the sentence.
When the original verb is intransitive, the causative suffix introduces a new agent as sub-
ject, and the original agent becomes the object:41
Transitive event verb stems may be derived from some stative ones by the addition of the
derivational suffix -ty (where the y is subject to the stem derivations given previously in
2.4.1.1):
41This example also illustrates the fact that the stem formed by the addition of the causative suffix (to either a
basic-stem or a-stem can in turn be used to derive an a-stem form by replacing the final vowel of the complex with
a. No examples have been found where -kyty was added to an oa-stem.
38 Phonology and Morphology
b. Da-there-ta no.
I-be.hot-verbalizer it
‘I heated it.’
c. Da-there-toa-bo.
I-hot-verbalizer.pass/refl-CONT
‘I am warming (myself) up.’ or
‘I am getting warm.’
Intransitive event verbs may be derived from many nouns with the suffix -da:
(83) a. Da-bode-da-bo.
I-fishhook-verbalizer-CONT
‘I am fishing (with a line and hook).’
b. L-itotolhi-da-bo.
he-nail-verbalizer-CONT
‘He is nailing.’
(84) a. He is hammering.
b. He is building.
Stative verbs are the second large class of verbs in Arawak. Unlike Arawak event verbs,
stative verbs connote a state of being or an attribute of the subject. They never involve
physical motion, or physical or mental activities. Syntactically, they are clearly distinct
from event verbs. Whereas event verbs occur in SVO and SV sentences, stative verbs occur
in VS sentences.42
42The syntax of stative sentences is discussed in sections dealing with stative clauses (3.2.3). Also discussed
there is some evidence for assuming that the noun phrase following the stative verb is truly the subject of the
sentence. This evidence rests in part on the observation that the subject-relativization suffixes -thi and -tho appear
when such a noun phrase is relativized.
2.4 Verbs 39
b. Fonasia-ka de.
hungry-PERF I
‘I am hungry.’
Almost all words which are non-derived stative verbs in Arawak would, in English, tend
to be adjectives. For example, note the words in the following list:43
However, in Arawak, these words cannot be used as noun modifiers in a noun phrase unless they
receive one of the subject-relativizing suffixes (see Section 3.1 on noun phrase structure).
Stative verbs are less richly inflected than event verbs. In particular, stative verbs cannot
receive modality or directional suffixes. This may be because these notions seem to apply
to events and are therefore semantically incompatible with stative verbs. One other differ-
ence between stative verbs and event verbs is that, because they occur in Verb-Subject sen-
tences, stative verbs cannot receive pronoun prefixes,44 and the pronoun suffixes which
occur on them correspond to subjects rather than objects.
43As was the case with event verbs, the citation forms for stative verbs receive the subordinating or
nominalizing suffix -n.
44Pronoun prefixes and suffixes always occur in the same position relative to the verb that their corresponding
(89) a. Tabysia-ka-i.
sleepy-PERF-he
‘He is sleepy.’
b. Bora-ka-n.
sour-PERF-it
‘It is sour.’
Other than these differences, the structure of a stative verb word is the same as an event
verb word. Specific affixes and their ordering may be found in Figure 8. Affixes in the same
order class cannot co-occur.
0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
stem -n -thi -ra -bo pron
SUB WH.SUBJ EXPECT CONT
-tho -na -ka
WH.SUBJ UNEXP PERF
-ja
PAST.CONT
-fa
FUT
-(n)bia
INCH
-›
PAST
Figure 8. Stative Verb Structure
The meanings of the verb affixes when they are applied to stative verbs are much the same
as their meanings when applied to event verbs (see Figure 7). There are some subtle differ-
ences due to the interactions between the tense and aspect components of the suffixes and
the semantics of stative verbs. These differences are discussed in Chapter 5.
Some examples of clauses with stative verbs using some of the various affixes are as follows:
(91) a. Nykamy-ka-i.
sad-PERF-he
‘He is sad.’
b. Hebe-fa-n.
full-FUT-it
‘It will be full.’
c. Hebe-bo to keke.
full-CONT the basket
‘The basket is now full and getting fuller.’
d. Hebe-bia no.
full-INCH it
‘It is becoming full.’ or ‘It will become full.’
e. Hebe-ra-fa no.
full-EXPECT-FUT it
‘The basket will be full, of course.’
f. Fonasia-› de.
hungry-PAST I
‘I was hungry.’
There are several means by which stative verbs may be derived from words in other lexi-
cal classes.
Stative verb stems can be derived from simple or derived nouns with the attributive prefixes
ka- ‘attributive (to have or be)’ and ma- ‘privative (to not have or not be)’. The stative verb
which results can then receive any of the suffixes normally associated with stative verbs.
(92) a. ka-sikoa-n
ATTR-house-SUB
‘to have a house’ (i.e. opposite of houseless)’
b. Ka-balha-ka-i.
ATTR-hair-PERF-he
‘He is hairy.’
c. Ma-balha-ka no.
PRIV-hair-PERF she
‘She is hairless/bald.’
42 Phonology and Morphology
d. ka-polata-n
ATTR-money-SUB
‘to be rich’
b. Hala diako-fa-i
bench on-FUT-he
‘He will be on the bench.’
Unlike other stative verbs, however, for a postposition to occur as the main verb of a
stative sentence, it must receive one of the stative tense/aspect suffixes.
When postpositions are used as the main verb of a sentence, the noun phrase preceding
the postposition is its object, and the one following is the subject.46
There are two other verbs in Arawak which deserve special attention. One of these is a
semantically empty verb a which I gloss as ‘dummy’. The other is the copula to ‘is’, used in
equative sentences.
The semantically empty dummy verb (i.e. pro-verb) in Arawak behaves in some ways
like the English AUX.47 It is found in sentences with preposed manner-adverbials or pre-
posed verbs with the privative prefix m(a)- ‘not be, not have.’
45See sections on postpositions (2.5), and discussions of stative verb structure (2.4.2.1) and postposition
stranding (4.4.4.1, 4.4.4.2) for more details.
46See sections on stative sentence structure (3.2.3) and relativization of objects of postpositions (4.4.4.1,
As can be seen in the above examples, the dummy verb is the main verb of the sentence.
It carries most of the verb affixes, and all other verbs in the sentence receive the subordi-
nation suffix -n.
The dummy verb behaves morphologically like an event verb, taking subject pronoun
prefixes and event verb suffixes. Semantically, the sentences in which it is found relate
events occurring at some specific time and place. Like other event verbs, it has two stem
forms: o (basic-stem form), and a (a-stem form).
The second verb that needs to be mentioned is the copular verb to ‘to be’. It is used only
in equative constructions connecting two noun phrases.48
Although the verb to ‘to be’ is identical in form to the definite article to ‘the’, the verb is
not the same as the article. They can co-occur in the same sentence (see example 97a), and
the verb does not change form according to the gender of the referents in the rest of the
sentence, whereas the article does.
The equative verb is sometimes, under as yet unknown circumstances, deleted; and simi-
larly, the articles are sometimes deleted. This means that at times it is impossible to know
for sure whether a particular to is an article or a verb. For example,
2.5 Postpositions
Arawak postpositions represent a large class of words which function in most situations very simi-
larly to English prepositions, except that they follow, rather than precede, their object NP.49
It is not entirely clear that postpositions should be considered as a separate lexical class
apart from nouns or verbs. One possible alternative might be to assume that postpositions
should be considered verbs—that is, locative stative verbs. This proposal is attractive be-
cause, in fact, locative postpositions50 can serve as the main verb of a sentence if they are
inflected with stative verb suffixes (see also sections on stative sentences 3.2.3).
b. Tho-loko-ka no.
it-in-PERF it
‘It is in it (e.g. the cassava beer is in a gourd).’
However, unlike verbs, postpositions can occur without the subordinating morpheme -n, even
when they are not the main verb of a sentence. For example, notice that neither of the postposi-
tions in the following examples is subordinated (i.e. receives the suffix -n), whereas the word
moroda-n ‘fly’ in the last example is subordinated, thus receiving the suffix -n.
49See also de Goeje (1928), Hickerson (1953), and Taylor (1970a and 1970b).
50This is not to say that only locative postpositions can be used as verbs; however, these are the only ones for
which I have clear evidence.
2.5 Postpositions 45
Postpositions also differ from verbs in that they cannot easily be said in isolation. For ex-
ample, although event verbs and stative verbs have citation forms (stem+SUB), there
seems to be no citation form for postpositions.51 This has led some (e.g. Hickerson 1953) to
list all postpositions as suffixes.
Another alternative classification of postpositions is alluded to by Taylor (1970b:31)—to
consider them nouns. Taylor points out that, in fact, there are several nouns which are
homophonous, or nearly homophonous, with semantically similar postpositions. For
example, he mentions:
However, these correspondences are very sporadic; and in general, postpositions cannot be
used as nouns, nor do they enter into the kinds of derivational processes other nouns do.
Although the arguments for or against treating postpositions as separate from verbs and
nominals are not conclusive, postpositions are treated separately in the remainder of this study.
Arawak postpositions may be roughly divided into several groups. The largest of these
groups consists of postpositions having to do with locations. A smaller group consists of ba-
sically temporal postpositions. In addition, there is a group of postpositions with more spe-
cialized functions. Figure 9 gives a sampling.52
Two of the locational postpositions in Figure 9, nin ‘at’ and ninro ‘toward’, can be phono-
logically reduced to -n and -nro, respectively, and often occur as suffixes53 on nouns or on
other postpositions.
51Postposition stems are used in this study when referring to postpositions. Most Arawak speakers find this
puzzling and prefer to add an appropriate pronoun prefix to them (e.g. tho-loko ‘in it’).
52See also the discussion of noun shape classes (2.3.3.4) regarding the use of the various Arawak postpositions
corresponding to the English preposition ‘in’.
53That these are suffixes can be deduced from the fact that they cannot receive word stress, and they cannot
Another of the locational postpositions, waria ‘away from’, can also be reduced (to -aria); but as a
suffix, it only seems to occur as a directional on other postpositions (see below), not on nouns.
LOCATIONAL POSTPOSITIONS
abon ‘under’
amyn ‘by, at’
boloko ‘at the side, end’
diako ‘on the surface of’
dikhi ‘behind, following’
inabo ‘behind, following’
khiradi ‘near, next to’
khona ‘on (not on top of)’
koboroko ‘among, in a living body’
koloko ‘in (fire, sunshine, etc.)’
kosan ‘next to’
loko ‘in (in a hollow or solid object)’
maja, maria ‘general vicinity, to the side of’
makhana ‘between’
nakanrokon ‘in the midst of’
nin ‘at (any location), belonging to’
ninro ‘toward’
olaboan ‘opposite side’
rakon ‘in (in a fluid)’
rokon ‘in (on the inside surface of)’
waria ‘away from’
TEMPORAL POSTPOSITIONS
bena ‘after’
bora ‘before’
kha ‘while’
OTHER POSTPOSITIONS
abo ‘with (instrumental)’
adi ‘greater than, above’
doma ‘because, on account of’
farokha ‘if’ (some dialects: harokha)
khonan ‘about, concerning’
myn ‘to, for (benefactive, IO)’
oma ‘with (accompaniment)’
Figure 9. Selected Arawak Postpositions
2.5 Postpositions 47
Most of the locational postpositions in Figure 9 are generally concerned with static situa-
tions. If motion is involved, they are combined with either -nro ‘toward’ (105c) or -aria
‘away from’ (105d). If the location is one in which an activity is occurring (i.e. an adver-
bial), the postposition receives the suffix -di ‘ADV’ (105b).54 This means that, if one disre-
gards their internal structure, most locational postpositions have four forms: the basic one
and three others, with -di, -nro, and -aria (see Figure 10).
The benefactive postposition myn55 is used with any person or thing (other than the grammatical
subject or object) which is a recipient or benefits from an action.56 It is also used to indicate the in-
direct object of ditransitive verbs and may therefore occur more than once in a sentence.
In reporting direct quotations, the person being spoken to is also indicated with this postposition.
2.6 Functors
The label “Functors” is used here purely as a means of grouping together a number of small,
miscellaneous lexical classes. This is a diverse group; and, syntactically, its members have in
common only that they cannot take pronominal affixes (which verbs, nominals, and postposi-
tions all can take). With the exception of the numbers, the functor classes are all closed.
Arawak has a number of question words, many of which also serve as relative pronouns.57
Both relative pronouns and question words occur at the left periphery of their clauses (see
Chapter 4).
b. Ama b-ani-bo?
what you-do-CONT
‘What are you doing?’
2.6.2 Conjunctions
Arawak conjunctions consist of three words for ‘and’ and one word for ‘or’. The most
general form used for the coordinating conjunction ‘and’ is ken. It is used to join both inde-
pendent clauses and constituents within clauses.
57Itis possible to decompose these question words. For example, amadoma consists of ama ‘what’ plus the
postposition doma ‘because’, and amabia consists of ama ‘what’ plus the inchoative suffix -bia. However, these
combinations have become so conventionalized that they are, for all practical purposes, single lexemes.
2.6 Functors 49
Unlike ken, the conjunctions mathi ‘and/with’ and matho ‘and/with’ are used only to con-
join nominal constituents. Mathi is used when the constituent following it has the feature
[+male] (see the discussion of gender features in Section 2.3.1.2), and matho is used when
the following constituent is [–human] or [+human –male]. Both of these words are proba-
bly derived from oma ‘with’ plus the relativization suffixes -thi and -tho (see discussion of
event verb suffixes in Section 2.4.1.3).
Manthan ‘or’ may be used only to join clauses and usually precedes each of the clauses conjoined.
2.6.3 Numerals
58De Goeje (1928:188) and Hickerson (1953:185) document another system for counting from ten to twenty
using a morpheme kotibana meaning “on the surface of the foot” (which I assume is kothi-bana ‘foot-expanse’).
None of the Arawaks I have questioned about this counting system have heard of it or accept it. It may be that this
system is or was in use in Guyana.
59Older speakers take great delight in quizzing young people on whether they know how to count in Arawak.
Most young people do not know the numbers above nineteen, and many do not know them above ten.
50 Phonology and Morphology
0 amakho
1 aba
2 bian
3 kabyn
4 bithi
5 (a)badakhabo (aba-da-khabo ‘one-my-hand’)
6 (a)bathian
7 bianthian
8 kabynthian
9 bithithian
10 biandakhabo (bian-da-khabo ‘two-my-hand’)
11 biandakhabo diako abaro (‘two-my-hand on one’)
14 biandakhabo diako bithi
15 biandakhabo diako badakhabo
19 biandakhabo diako bithithian
20 aba loko (‘one man’)
21 aba loko diako abaro (‘one man on one’)
24 aba loko diako bithi
25 aba loko diako abadakhabo
29 aba loko diako bithithian
30 aba loko diako biandakhabo
31 aba loko diako biandakhabo diako abaro
40 bian loko
41 bian loko diako abaro
50 bian loko diako biandakhabo
99 bithi loko diako biandakhabo diako bithithian
100 (a)badakhabo loko
Figure 11. Arawak Numbers
Some of the more common adverbial particles in Arawak are as follows: hibin already’,
hibibo ‘almost’, and koan ‘still/yet’:
b. Bo-khota-bo koan?
you-eat-CONT still
‘Are you still eating?’
2.6 Functors 51
There are several tense particles in Arawak, in addition to the tense/aspect affixes men-
tioned in the discussion of verb structure. These particles all establish times relative to the
time of speaking; and therefore they seem to indicate absolute tense (Comrie 1985).60
There are also a number of other time words available in the language. These, however
seem to be more noun-like.
The following example is the introductory sentence of a story, and illustrates the use of
some of the above time words.
(116) Abahan koba, wakharo sabo kho to, d-osa da-koba-n soka-nro.
once dist.past, nowadays more not is, I-go my-planting.ground-POSS chop-toward
‘Once, a long time ago, I went to cut open my planting ground (i.e. cut down the
jungle trees to clear a field).’
60See also the discussion of tense and aspect in discourse (Chapter 5).
Chapter 3
Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
Noun phrases serve as the subject or object of a clause, as the object of a postpositional
phrase, or as appositives. Their structure (see Figure 12) consists of an optional determiner
(DET), an optional quantifier phrase (QP), an optional possessor noun phrase (NP) or rela-
tive clause (Sø), a head noun (N), and an optional relative clause (Sø).1
Each of the constituents of the noun phrase is discussed in some detail below. The discus-
sion on relative clauses here is limited to how they function as constituents of a noun
phrase; fuller discussion of their internal structure is deferred to Chapter 4 which deals
specifically with relative clauses.
The determiner (DET) of the noun phrase may be an article or a demonstrative adjective. Its
presence seems to be obligatory when mentioning any referent already introduced into the dis-
course. This means that for Arawak, determiners are even used with proper names.
(117) a. li falhetho
the white.man
b. toho hiaro
that woman
1Arawak does not seem to allow noun phrase complements equivalent to English “a story about John.” Such
concepts in Arawak are expressed by a relative clause based on a postposition used as stative verb for example:
52
3.1 Noun Phrase Structure 53
c. li Wim
Bill
A quantifier phrase (QP) may consist of a number or a phrase such as minkho johon ‘very
many’. Only one quantifier phrase is allowed in a noun phrase.
A quantifier phrase rarely co-occurs with a determiner. When it does, the noun phrase
containing it is in a topicalized, sentence-initial position before the subject of the main
clause, or is a subject or object appositive following the nucleus of the sentence. In both of
these cases, a determiner is obligatory.
A single embedded noun phrase can precede the head noun of a noun phrase.2
b. to falhetho bejokha
the white.man musical.instrument
‘the white man’s instrument (i.e. radio, record player, etc.)’
As might be inferred from the ‘tapir skin’ example (120a), when a noun phrase occurs
before the head of the noun phrase, it is understood as the possessor of the head noun.
Only one such possessive noun phrase can modify the head noun. If more than one noun
phrase occurs, each is understood as the possessor of the following one.
(121) a. to de lhyky-koana
the my cut-instrument
‘my scissors’
b. to da-thi sikoa
the my-father house
‘my father’s house’
Relative clauses3 occurring immediately before the head of a noun phrase predicate
something about that head. These relative clauses may be based on either stative or active
verbs. As mentioned previously under the discussion of stative verbs (2.4.2), concepts
which would be expressed with attributive adjectives in English are expressed with relative
clauses in Arawak.
c. li [sioko-sabo-tho] ly-lykynthi
the [small-more-WH.SUBJ] his-grandson
‘his youngest grandson’
b. ne [dalhidi-thi] ibili-non
the [run-WH.SUBJ] small-PL
‘the running children’
Although more than one relative clause may occur before the head of a noun phrase, each
must be of a different semantic type (e.g. size, color, weight). As is the case in English, there
seems to be a usual order for the semantic categories expressed: size - weight - shape - color.
There is a limit on the complexity of the relative clauses that may appear before the head
of a noun phrase. The only constituents in these relative clauses that seem to be allowed,
other than the verb with appropriate relativizing morphology, are morphologically bound
subject prefixes and pre-verbal adverbial particles of extent, intensification, and negation.
If any additional constituents such as objects or locatives are added to such a clause, it ap-
pears to become too “heavy” and is placed after the head.
The question of what makes a relative clause “heavy” in Arawak remains open at the mo-
ment. It is interesting to note, however, that English has similar phenomena. For example,
although it is acceptable to have more than a bare participial before the head of a noun
phrase,
a person’s given name is traditionally avoided. (See de Goeje 1928 regarding an explanation based on former
shamanistic practices.)
56 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
The unacceptability of the first of the bad phrases could be due to the fact that in English sen-
tences, an agent phrase follows the passive verb. This seems to be true also in participial clauses,
as in (131).
English also seems to have a requirement that the head of a participial relative con-
struction must be adjacent to the head of the relative construction itself (i.e. in final
position in the relative clause). This explains the unacceptability of the second and
third bad phrases given above. Since the requirement for the position of the agent
phrase conflicts with the requirement that the head of the participial construction must
be adjacent to the head of the NP, the participial modifier can only follow the head in
such cases.
Similar principles may be operating in Arawak. For example, an adjacency principle like
the one mentioned for English would explain the unacceptability of pre-head relative
clauses with explicit objects or postpositional phrases between the verb of the relative
clause and the head of the entire relative clause (examples repeated from above).
The unacceptability of full nominal subjects in pre-head relative clauses with relativized
objects is not as easy to explain since both morphologically bound and morphologically
free pronouns in the same position are acceptable. Presumably at least the morphologically
free pronouns are under the subject NP node just like full nominal subjects.
b. to [ly-dibaleda-sia] khota-ha
the [he-roast-WH.OBJ] meat-NGEN
‘the meat he roasted’
Whatever the syntactic explanation for this is,5 perceptually, the ungrammatical example
above is the start of a “garden path” sentence. The hearer assumes the article to is the de-
terminer of an NP with Ka-balha ‘Hairy’ as head and that this noun phrase is the subject of
an independent clause. The hearer then proceeds to ignore the relativizing suffix and as-
sumes khotaha ‘meat’ is inside the VP of this clause. When the hearer then attempts to pro-
cess anything following the relative clause, this following material then sounds to him like
a run-on sentence.
A possessor NP and a relative clause cannot co-occur before the head of a noun phrase in
such a way that both modify that head. If both do occur in this position, the construction is
interpreted to mean that the relative clause modifies the possessor NP, not the head of the
noun phrase or the combination of the head and possessor.
In Arawak, to express concepts such as the two unacceptable translations above, one
must use a post-head relative clause6 with the stative verb nin.7
As can be seen in many of the above examples, the head of the noun phrase may be sin-
gular or plural, simple or derived.8
5One possibility might be that a subject NP would have no source for case if pre-head relative clauses are
non-finite. However, it is unclear how to prove they are non-finite, since it is possible for these clauses to receive
tense marking and they do not receive the subordinating suffix -n. For example,
to [ly-dibaleda-sia-bo] khota-ha
(the [he-roast-WH.OBJ-CONT] meat-NGEN)
‘the meat he is roasting’
555
6See Section 3.1.6 on post-head relative clauses.
7Nin is actually the generalized location postposition, but like other postpositions, it can be used as a
two-argument stative verb. See Section 3.2.3.
8The use of the plural suffix is optional for [–human] nouns. See Section 2.3.3.3 for a discussion on number in nouns.
58 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
b. bian kodibio-be
two bird-PL
‘two birds’
If the head of the NP is a pronoun, no other constituents may precede it. For example, in the
following noun phrases, the relative clause ‘who ran’ can precede the head of a noun phrase
when that head is a noun. However, it must follow the head when the head is a pronoun.
b. lirabo
he.distant
‘he (over there)’
c. lirabo dalhidi-thi
he.distant run-WH.SUBJ
‘the one (over there) who ran’
d. *dalhidi-thi lirabo9
*run-WH.SUBJ he.distant
*‘the one (over there) who ran’
If the head of a noun phrase is not a pronoun, it may be modified either by a possessor
NP (see Section 3.1.3) or by a morphologically bound possessive pronoun. Morphologically
bound pronouns do not have the same co-occurrence restrictions that possessor NPs have.
As has already been mentioned, possessor NPs cannot co-occur with pre-head relative
clauses. This means that when a morphologically free pronoun functions as the head of a
possessor NP, it cannot also co-occur with a pre-head relative clause. However, a morpho-
logically bound possessive pronoun can. This contrast can be explained by assuming that
morphologically bound pronouns are, in fact, part of the head noun of the matrix NP and
do not function syntactically as possessor NPs.10 They then fall outside of the co-occurrence
restriction. For example, notice the use of ‘her’ in the following examples:
9Example (137d) is ungrammatical only if it is taken as a single noun phrase. It is grammatical as an equative
sentence meaning: ‘He (over there) is the one who is running.’
10This assumes a structure something like the following:
clitic N
3.1 Noun Phrase Structure 59
b. to sioko-tho th-ala-n
the small-WH.SUBJ her-bench-POSS
‘her small bench’
The word sioko-tho ‘small-WH.SUBJ’ in the latter of these examples would have to be
taken as modifying thora ‘her’, a pronoun. Since this is not allowed, the phrase is
ungrammatical.
When a quantifier phrase and a morphologically bound possessive pronoun both occur in
the same noun phrase, the phrase seems to receive a partitive interpretation.
A relative clause can also occur after the head of the noun phrase. At first glance, the
kinds of relative clauses that appear here seem to be in complementary distribution with
those that appear before the head. That is, after the head, one finds relative clauses which
are too heavy to appear before the head, and others which cannot appear there due to the
presence of a possessor NP in that position.
However, this complementarity is not complete. Short relative clauses based on stative
verbs (i.e. relative clauses consisting of just a stative verb with relativizing morphology,
60 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
but no other constituents) can not appear after the head of the NP, even if they are disal-
lowed before the head due to the presence of a possessor NP.11
Also, short relative clauses based on event verbs can appear after the head, even when
there is no possessor NP in the phrase which would force them to appear there.
b. to [da-dibaleda-sia] khota-ha
the [I-roast-WH.OBJ] meat
‘the meat I roasted’
Corresponding to the major verb types,12 there are two major sentence types: event sen-
tences and stative sentences. In addition, there are other types, such as event sentences
based on the dummy verb a, and equative sentences with the copular verb to.
In the following sections, it should be kept in mind that there is no structural or morpho-
logical difference between statements and yes-no questions. When sentences are simple
statements, they are spoken with a sentence-final falling intonation. Speaking them with a
sentence-final rising intonation can change any sentence13 into a yes-no question.
11The unacceptable phrases are acceptable as independent attributive sentences: ‘The machete is dull.’ ‘My
machete is dull.’ See section 3.2.3.1 on attributive sentences.
12See discussion of verbs in Section 2.4.
13Sentences with second-person subjects or objects can be interpreted as questions, even without question
intonation. Sentences with first person subjects or objects are rarely interpreted as questions. Word order is not a
significant factor in determining whether a sentence is interpreted as a statement or question.
3.2 Sentence Structure 61
Event sentences describe actions or processes. These sentences consist primarily of a sub-
ject noun phrase, and a verb phrase containing an event verb and those constituents for
which it is subcategorized such as its direct object (NP),14 indirect object postpositional
phrase (PP), or locational postpositional phrase (PP). In addition, event sentences may con-
tain sentence modifiers such as adverbials (ADV), other postpositional phrases, a single
fronted constituent whose position is tentatively labeled (COMP),15 and subject or object
appositives (APP). A rough formulation giving some idea of the major constituents and
their relative ordering may be found in Figure 13.
Below are some examples of various kinds of event sentences with this general structure.
(143) a. Intransitive:
L-osa bahy-nro mothia sabo khan, li wadili.
he-go house-to morning more diminutive the man
‘He, the man, went home very early in the morning.’
(144) a. Transitive:
Mothi na-lhyky-fa sikalho.
tomorrow they-cut-FUT sugarcane
‘Tomorrow they will cut sugarcane.’
15This position bears a superficial resemblance to the base generated COMP position in English and other languages
in that it is the landing site for movement of constituents, such as question words and relative pronouns, to the left
periphery of the clause.
62 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
The last two examples each contain an embedded transitive clause which seems to func-
tion as the object of the verbs kanabyn ‘to hear’ and sikin ‘to give’, respectively.16 The form
of these subordinate clauses is the same as that of independent clauses, except that the
verb in the subordinate clause contains the subordinating or nominalizing morpheme -n in
the first case and a WH-suffix in the second. Subordinate clauses of these types are dis-
cussed in later sections.
Some of the above examples also contain adverbial time words. Adverbs and
postpositional phrases can appear in a number of places, but they never occur between the
verb and the subject of the clause nor between the verb and the constituents for which it is
subcategorized—for example, between a transitive verb and its objects, or between a mo-
tion verb like osyn ‘to go’ and its directive complement.17
As can be seen in several of the preceding examples, indirect objects are almost always
expressed with postpositional phrases that use the benefactive postposition myn, and occur
immediately following the direct object of the clause. I have observed a few instances18
where the indirect object of sikin ‘to give’ occurred without a postposition. In these cases, it
always occurred between the verb and the direct object, much as it does in English and
Dutch, and it consisted of a pronoun rather than a full noun phrase.
16Sikin ‘to give’ generally takes an NP as its complement; thus the embedded clause is probably best analyzed as a
noun phrase. The question of the status of these free relative constructions is discussed in Section 4.2 on relative clauses.
17However, sentences like the one in example (146c) do become acceptable if there is an intonation break
between ‘yesterday’ and ‘home-to’. Such an intonation break makes ‘home-to’ sound like an afterthought.
18In texts transcribed from tapes over a period of more than five years, I have recorded about fifteen instances
of bare indirect objects. Of these, only three remained in the texts when the speakers themselves edited the
transcriptions.
3.2 Sentence Structure 63
Since the use of bare indirect objects seems to be so rare, and since it seems to be re-
stricted to the verb ‘give’, it is unclear to me whether examples of the use of bare indirect
objects are due to influence from from the other languages with which Arawaks are con-
stantly in contact (e.g. Dutch, the national language of Suriname), or whether dative move-
ment is a feature of Arawak itself. When questioned about the grammaticality of sentences
like the above, Arawaks react to them as acceptable. Yet when editing their own written
texts, they almost always replace the bare indirect object with one in a postpositional
phrase.
The position tentatively labeled ‘COMP’ in Arawak is not entirely similar to the COMP of
English. As in English, the COMP position serves as a landing site for fronted constituents.
These fronted constituents bear a grammatical relationship to the clause and correspond to
a gap elsewhere in the clause. They include question words and relative pronouns,19 as
well as other phrases such as object NPs, postpositional phrases, and time phrases. For ex-
ample, in each of the (b) and (c) examples of (148–150), the first constituent of the sen-
tence corresponds to a gap (›) in the position where that constituent would normally be
found.
b. Ama by-malhita ›?
what you-make ›
‘What did you make?’
b. Alikha l-osy-fa ›?
When he-go-FUT ›
‘When will he go?’
c. Mothi l-osy-fa ›.
tomorrow he-go-FUT ›
‘Tomorrow he will go.’
Unlike English, however, Arawak does not have lexical complementizers such as ‘that’ or
‘for ... to’ which can occupy the COMP position. Instead, the language marks the verb of
the subordinate clause with the subordination suffix -n.
Also unlike English, Arawak does not allow COMP-to-COMP movement of question
words or relative pronouns. All movements to the position labeled COMP in Arawak seem
to be clause bounded.
The apparent COMP position of the sentence in Arawak can contain only a single constit-
uent. For example, in the above examples, when a time word or phrase like miaka ‘yester-
day’ occurs at the beginning of the sentence, it occupies this position, and no other
constituents of the sentence can be fronted.20
Constituents in what I have labeled the COMP position seem to represent highlighted
new information and, if present, generally receive the center of intonation of the clause.21
In this respect they seem to represent a type of ‘focus movement’ (Prince 1981). Though
20It is possible, however, for a time phrase to occur in TOPIC position (see Section 3.2.1.2), in which case the
sentence has a major intonational break between the TOPIC and the rest of the sentence. For example,
21Constituents such as relative pronouns in the COMP position of a subordinate clause do not receive the center
of intonation. Question words in the COMP position of independent clauses sometimes do and sometimes do not.
66 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
their use is frequent, it is most common in discourse contexts such as asking questions, or
answering them, and when presenting unexpected or contrastive information.
In addition to the focused element but distinguished from it, a sentence may contain a
TOPIC phrase. This phrase may be of almost any sort, including an entire nominalized sub-
ordinate clause.22 Unlike the COMP, the TOPIC phrase bears no grammatical relation to the
rest of the sentence; it is not associated with a gap and therefore should be considered base
generated in its leftward position. There is always an intonation break between the constit-
uent in TOPIC position and the rest of the sentence.
That the TOPIC and ‘focus’ (COMP) positions are distinct can be shown by the fact that
the positions can both be filled at the same time.
Also, since the phrase in the position labeled COMP always corresponds to a gap and the
TOPIC position does not, the distribution of what can occur in the two positions is differ-
ent. For example, it is possible to have a time word in TOPIC position, and a direct object
NP in the COMP position, because the time word does not necessarily imply a later gap.
That is, the verbs do not typically select time phrases.
However, the converse is not possible. That is, it is not possible to place a direct object NP
in TOPIC position and leave a gap. If one wishes to topicalize a direct object, a resumptive
pronoun must also be used in the normal position for the direct object.
Unlike the phrases in COMP, the phrases in the TOPIC position always seem to be old,
given, or presupposed information, and they in some sense set the stage for the following
information. They set forth what the sentence will be about.
Taking the preceding discussion of the COMP and TOPIC positions into account and ignoring, for
the moment, the internal structure of the core of the sentence, the structure of the sentence including
the TOPIC and COMP positions might be something like that found in Figure 14. This structure per-
haps needs to be modified somewhat to account for the “dummy verb” sentences discussed below.
In addition to event sentences like those discussed above which have an SVO structure,
Arawak has others which, at first glance, seem to have a different structure and which con-
tain a semantically empty dummy verb.
There are a number of factors that make it look as if dummy verb sentences are, in
some sense, derived from previously discussed event sentences. That is, dummy verb sen-
tences are probably best analyzed as event sentences with fronted manner adverbials or
fronted negated verbs, and when such elements are fronted, the dummy verb a appears.
One of the factors that leads one to this conclusion is that the discourse contexts in which
these sentences are used are similar to those in which elements such as direct objects are
moved to the position labeled ‘COMP’ in other event sentences. As mentioned previously when
discussing event sentences (3.2.1.1), fronting to the COMP position seems to highlight new in-
formation. The contexts in which one finds dummy verb sentences are compatible with this
notion. Furthermore, as in other sentences where a constituent is fronted to the COMP posi-
tion, the fronted element in dummy verb sentences receives the center of intonation for the
sentence. For example, dummy verb sentences starting with negative verbs tend to occur as
questions25 or as answers to questions. When used in this way, it is the negated verb which is
being questioned or affirmed, or, perhaps, the negation itself is being emphasized.
24Like most other event verbs, the dummy verb has a basic-stem form and an a-stem form (see Section 2.4.1.1
on verb stem forms). Almost all contexts in which the dummy verb occurs are ones where the morphological
difference between the two is not manifested, and therefore a is used (see Section 2.4.1.1.1 on basic and a-stem
forms). However, the basic-stem form, -o-, does show up with the future suffix -fa as in:
c. Thy-jokara no da-myn.
She-sell it me-to
‘She sold it to me.’
Similarly, dummy verb sentences starting with adverbials can also be used to answer questions,
especially when the adverbial in some way contrasts with presuppositions in the question.
This contrasts with the neutral form for this sentence where the adverb follows the verb.26
verb is subcategorized) they end in n. When they are fronted, this disappears. Presumably this is the same
subordinating morpheme -n ‘SUB’ found on verbs in subordinate clauses.
70 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
In addition to discourse contexts, there are also several structural peculiarities in dummy
verb sentences that support the idea of a fronted verbal or adverbial element. As can be
seen in the previous examples, two of which are repeated below, if the sentence starts with
a negative event verb, and if that verb is transitive, its subject precedes the dummy verb
and its object or objects follow the dummy verb, not the lexical verb Any locative
postpositional phrases associated with the fronted verb also follow the dummy verb.
This is unusual, since, except when a constituent such as the direct object of the verb is
fronted, nothing other than a negative particle ever seems to separate a verb in Arawak
from its arguments. Arawak verbs, apparently, cannot carry their NP arguments or their
tense suffixes with them when they are fronted.
The previously mentioned discourse contexts in which dummy verb sentences occur
all argue for the landing site being the COMP position. This is further supported by the fact
that the COMP position in these sentences cannot be filled by another element. For exam-
ple, sentence constituents which one can normally front to the COMP position, cannot be
moved there in dummy verb sentences.27
27However, just as is the case with other event sentences in which the COMP position is filled, the phrase in
COMP position can be preceded by a TOPIC phrase. Again, if this phrase in the TOPIC position happens to be a
direct object, a resumptive pronoun is required.
If one compares non-subcategorized time and locative phrases with manner adver-
bial phrases like “well” and “slowly,” the manner adverbials seem more closely tied to
the verb semantically than time and locative ones are. Time and location adverbials set
up the general temporal and spatial framework for the whole of the sentence, while
manner adverbs directly modify the action denoted by the verb. Further support of this
semantic argument is provided by the fact that, in Arawak, if both manner adverbials
and non-subcategorized locative or time phrases are present, manner adverbials occur
closer to the verb than non-subcategorized time and locative ones do.
This being the case, we may suppose that Arawak has a level of structure between the
verb and VP—call it Vø. Subcategorized phrases, including direct objects, are daughters of
Vø under standard assumptions (XP3 in Figure 16). Manner phrases, as modifiers in VP, can
be viewed as daughters of VP (XP2 in Figure 16). Finally, locative and time phrases can be
viewed as daughters of S (XP1 in Figure 16).
NP INFL VP XP1
(time, location)
Vø XP2*
(manner)
V* NP PP XP3
(DO) (IO) (subcategorized for by verb)
*Constituents marked with ‘*’ require dummy verb when fronted.
If one now considers the effect of fronting the various constituents in relation to
this proposed structure, one sees that some trigger the use of the dummy verb, and oth-
ers do not. As has already been discussed, time (P1), location phrases (XP1 and XP3),
direct objects, and indirect object postpositional phrases can all be fronted without the
addition of the dummy verb. Only the fronting of verbs and manner adverbials (XP2)
requires the use of a dummy verb construction.
72 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
In the case of manner adverbials,28 this shows up not just in focus movement, but also
in content questions and free relative clauses.29
(172) a. De koborokoa-ka koan [alika th-a-n aba kabadaro hibin bokoto-n de.]
I remember-INDIC still [how it-dummy-SUB one jaguar almost grab-SUB me]
‘I still remember how a jaguar almost grabbed me.’
b. Alikan by-dykha ›?
who you-see ›
‘Who did you see?’
are grammatical. One might conclude therefore, that antecedent-government can satisfy
the Empty Category Principle (ECP) in Arawak. If one did so, however, then one would not
be able to explain the necessity for the dummy verb in manner questions (such as in 174b).
28Content
questions for verbs are constructed by recasting the sentence so that the questioned constituent is the
complement of the verb ‘do’.
Ama b-ani-bo?
what you-do-CONT
‘What are you doing?’
29There is some question as to the exact structure of apparent free relative clauses in Arawak. See the discussion
in Section 4.2.
3.2 Sentence Structure 73
If the landing site for fronted constituents is not COMP, but is a position adjoined to S (XP in
Figure 17), then antecedent-government would not function in Arawak. This would provide an ex-
planation for the lack of leftward generalized complementizers, the lack of COMP-to-COMP move-
ment, and the lack of proper government of a trace in the position of the verb. This solution would
also correctly predict that manner adverbials (XP2 in Figure 17) could not be properly governed.
S
XP S
NP INFL VP XP1
(time, location)
Vø XP2*
(manner)
V* NP PP XP3
(DO) (IO) (subcategorized for by verb)
*Constituents marked with ‘*’ require dummy verb when fronted and adjoined to S.
There is a potential problem with the solution, however. As already noted, the subject posi-
tion, and the adjunct position which is a daughter of S (XP1 in Figure 17) in Arawak, do seem to
be properly governed. Arawak does not require a resumptive pronoun in sentences like:30
Figures 18, 19, and 20 illustrate the proposed analysis in sentences with a fronted ob-
ject, verb, and manner adverbial, respectively.
30That the subject in the example has, in fact, been moved can be shown by the fact that other constituents,
such as time words, cannot be fronted in such a sentence.
74 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
Sø
TOPIC S
LSAP S
NP INFL VP
Vø
V NP PP
Sø
TOPIC S
LSAP S
NP INFL VP
Vø XP
V NP
Sø
TOPIC S
LSAP S
NP INFL VP
Vø XP
V NP
In addition to the cases mentioned in the previous sections, there is one other common
situation in Arawak where the dummy verb is used—in certain quotations. When the
clause which attributes a quotation to a particular participant follows the quotation, a
dummy verb is required. When it precedes the quotation, a dummy verb is unacceptable.
b. *“Hehe!” l-onaba.
*yes.emphatic he-answer
*‘“Yes!” he answered.’
76 Noun Phrase and Sentence Syntax
Quotation citations with the dummy verb are even possible without any other overt lexical verb.
In these cases, the context determines how best to translate the sentences into English.
b. *L-a “B-eithoa!”
*he-dummy you-know.self
*‘He said/thought/shouted, “Be careful!”’
From the above evidence, the dummy verb, again, seems to be needed when some sort of
fronting has occurred. It is not immediately obvious, however, that the quoted part of a cita-
tion can be related to the moved verbs or adverbials discussed in the previous section. One
might think that a quotation should be the subcategorized sentential complement of a verb of
saying, and therefore a sister to the verb. If this were the case, dummy verb insertion would
not be required by the ECP. For Arawak, however, verbs of saying like dain ‘to say/talk,’
onaban ‘answer,’ or simakan ‘to scream’ can be simple intransitive verbs and are therefore not
necessarily subcategorized for a direct object NP or for a sentential complement.
(180) Ly-dia-bo
he-speak-CONT
‘He is speaking/talking’
This may mean that the language treats the content of what is being said as somehow ad-
verbial in nature.31 One bit of evidence for such a hypothesis is that there are two types of
appropriate answers to the question.32
One can either reply with a manner adverbial, giving the manner of speaking, or with the
content of what was said.
In other words, it is possible to ask a question that elicits a quotation in the response by us-
ing the same question word, as well as the same construction, that is used for asking a
manner question.
affixes in INFL. However, all the material in INFL seems to be morphologically depend-
ent—perhaps including the dummy verb. If the dummy verb is morphologically dependent,
it must attach to something. Fully specified NP’s are not available33 because of the dis-
course considerations mentioned above. Morphologically free pronouns are not available
because they can never receive verbal suffixes. The only class of nominals available is that
of morphologically bound pronouns.
Alternatively, there may be an explanation for the above phenomena based on Case
Theory. In the theory of Government and Binding, Chomsky (1982) proposed that the pro-
hibition of lexical NPs in, for example, the subject position of an infinitive construction is
based on a case filter which says that every NP with a phonetic matrix must have Case. Put
negatively, this means that a lexical NP is prohibited if it does not receive Case.
If one argues backward from this principle, one might suppose that the reason lexical NPs
are prohibited from being the subject of the dummy verb is that the dummy verb (or INFL)
does not assign Case to its subject in a dummy verb sentence. However, there is no evident
reason why the dummy verb should not assign Case to its subject, so a stipulation would
apparently be required.
Arawak stative sentences are those sentences which do not describe an event. They
seem to fall into three groups. The first two each contain two noun phrases in an equative
or attributive relation, respectively, and the third has a stative verb with a single noun
phrase as subject.
Equative sentences consist of a noun phrase followed by the copular verb to, followed
by another noun phrase.
c. De to bylhyta-alhin.
I am write-one.who.habitually.does
‘I am a writer.’
Attributive sentences are like the above in that they contain two noun phrases, but are un-
like them in two ways: the noun phrases are associated by simple juxtaposition without a verb;
33Nouns sometimes appear to be able to receive some verbal suffixes. However, when they do, they are
behaving as stative verbs.
3.2 Sentence Structure 79
and one of the noun phrases, generally the first,34 consists of a free relative clause. It could be
argued that such a clause has a true relative clause construction with an empty head position,
since its head would, in all cases, be identical to the second NP of the sentence.
b. Kydy-tho to siba.
heavy-WH.SUBJ the stone
‘The stone is heavy.’
c. Firo-thi li wadili.
big-WH.SUBJ the man
‘The man is big.’
Although several of the above attributive sentences contain the form to, this to is the
article ‘the’ and is not the same as the copular verb to found in equative sentences. Unlike
the copular verb, the article must agree with the gender and number of the head of the
noun phrase, i.e. to ‘the (non-masculine)’, li ‘the (masculine singular)’ na ‘the (human plu-
ral)’. Furthermore, equative sentences are divided into three intonational units, with poten-
tial hesitation points before and after the copula. Attributive sentences are usually spoken
with a single intonation contour, and one cannot pause between the article and the rest of
the noun phrase.
Stative sentences can also be constructed with a stative verb as their main verb (see
Section 2.4.2 on stative verbs) followed by a subject noun phrase.
To siba, kydy-tho.
the stone heavy-WH.SUBJ
‘The stone is heavy.’
‘Concerning the stone, (it) is heavy.’
These sentences differ both from the other stative sentences and from event sentences. Un-
like other stative sentences which have, at most, a bare copula for a verb, the verb in
stative verb sentences can receive a rather full set of tense, affix, and pronoun affixes.35
b. Hebe-fa to dalhidi-koana.
full-FUT the run-thing
‘The car/bus will be full.’
c. Seme-ka to sikalho.
sweet-INDIC the sugarcane
‘The sugarcane is sweet.’
d. Somole-ka-i hibin.
drunk-INDIC-he already
‘He is already drunk.’
As can be seen in the above examples, this type of sentence also differs from other types
in its word order. This is the only type of sentence in Arawak where the subject clearly
seems to follow the verb.36
Fonasia-fa lirabo.
hungry-FUT he.over.there
‘He will be hungry.’
Lirabo osy-fa.
he.over.there go-FUT
‘He will go.’
In addition to the basic verb-subject ordering for these stative sentences, one occasion-
ally does find subject-first ones. However, such sentences seem to be the result of subject
fronting. As is the case with event sentences, in stative sentences it is also possible to front
various constituents to the LSAP position.
In event sentences, I have no clear examples of a subject, other than a relative pronoun
or question word, moving to the LSAP position.37 This may simply be because subject posi-
tion is adjacent to the LSAP and therefore such movement is undetectable.
In stative verb sentences, however, the subject can be fronted to LSAP, and the results of
this fronting are visible. The fronting creates stative verb sentences with what appears to
be a surface subject-verb constituent order. That this subject has landed in the LSAP posi-
tion can be shown by the fact that in stative sentences with fronted subjects, no other con-
stituents can be fronted to the LSAP.
That the nominal following stative verbs is, in fact, the subject can be shown by the fact
that when it is relativized, the subject-relativization suffix -thi/-tho WH.SUBJ appears.
b. to hehe-tho ada-yda
the yellow-WH.SUBJ tree-skin
‘the yellow bark’
It is possible to use postpositions in Arawak as stative verbs (see also Section 2.4.2.2
on derived stative verbs) by simply placing them in the verb position in the clause. When
used in this way, they can receive tense and aspect suffixes as well as the pronominal pre-
fixes and suffixes normally used with stative verbs. Interestingly, sentences of this type
have two NP arguments and could be regarded as stative analogues to transitive event sen-
tences. As in other stative sentences, the subject in these sentences also follows the verb.
37That a question word or relative pronoun is in the LSAP position can be shown by the fact that it cannot be
preceded by another fronted constituent (unless that constituent is in TOPIC position). Thus the following
sentence, spoken without an intonation break between ‘tomorrow’ and the rest of the sentence, is unacceptable:
c. Tho-loko-ka-i.
it-in-INDIC-he
‘He is in it (e.g. the house).’
Again, the grammatical roles of the nominals in question can be identified through the
test of relativization. Arawak seems to treat the noun phrase preceding such a
postpositional verb as an object, and the one following as a subject. As is the case with
both event and stative clauses, when the subject, in this case the nominal following the
verb, is relativized, the subject relativization suffix -tho/-thi (WH.SUBJ) appears.
When the nominal preceding the verb in these sentences is relativized, it is treated the
same as an object of transitive event sentence, and the object-relativization suffix -sia
(WH.OBJ) appears (see also Chapter 4 on relative clauses).
One of the distinctions already made with regard to Arawak relative clauses is between
those that precede their head and those that follow it. Previous sections on the constitu-
ents of the noun phrase (3.1) dealt chiefly with the kinds, or complexity, of relative clauses
83
84 Relative Clauses
which can appear in these two positions—“heavy” relative clauses occur after the head
while “light” ones may either precede or follow it—and with the interaction between the
possessor NP position of the matrix noun phrase and pre-head relative clauses. The distinc-
tion between pre-head and post-head relative clauses, in turn, correlates with the accept-
ability of an overt WH-word in the LSAP of the relative clause. An explicit WH-word is
never acceptable in a pre-head relative clause but is generally optional in a post-head one.
d. to [da-malhiti-sia-fa ›] bahy
the [I-make-WH.OBJ-FUT ›] house
‘the house I will make’
d. na [› dalhidi-thi] ibili-non
the [› run-WH.SUBJ] little-HUMAN.PL
‘the children who ran’
Other than modifications made to the above relative clauses to make them heavy or light
enough to appear in their respective positions, the clauses are similar in all other respects:
4.1 Differences in Pre- and Post-Head Relative Clauses 85
each has a gap, and each has an obligatory relativizer suffix appropriate to the grammati-
cal role of the gap attached to its main verb. Note also that neither type of relative clause
has the subordinating suffix -n, characteristic of other embedded clauses types, attached to
the its verb.1
It therefore seems to be just the linear position of the relative clause with respect to the
noun phrase head which determines whether an explicit relative pronoun is acceptable or
not in Arawak.
A possible explanation for this linear order effect may lie in the fact that conflicting prin-
ciples are applying to pre-head relative clauses. That is, it is a general fact of Arawak that
relative pronoun movement is to the COMP-like position I have labeled “LSAP” and that
this position is to the left of the rest of the clause. Yet there seems to be a preference
across languages for nothing to intervene between a relative pronoun and the head of the
noun phrase. Assuming that the latter is true of Arawak also, pre-head relative clauses can
satisfy both principles only if they do not have an explicit relative pronoun in LSAP, since
their LSAP is not adjacent to the head of the noun phrase. On the other hand, Arawak
post-head relative clauses allow both principles to be satisfied whether or not they have an
explicit relative pronoun.
The presence or absence of a relative pronoun in the LSAP position of a post-head relative
clause is not without semantic consequences. Relative clauses with relative pronouns tend to
be non-restrictive relative clauses,2 while those without seem to be restrictive ones. For in-
stance, the relative clauses in the sentences in the first set of examples below (199) are all
1The unacceptability of the subordinating suffix in these clauses is not due to an incompatibility between it and
the relativizing suffixes. Both can co-occur in free relative clauses (see sections below).
2Although the majority of post-head relative clauses with explicit relative pronouns seem to receive a
non-restrictive interpretation, a few seem to be restrictive. For example:
non-restrictive. The relative clauses in them provide additional information about the noun
phrases they modify, rather than limiting the range of possible referents of those noun phrases.
The relative clauses in the second set of examples (200), on the other hand, are restrictive.
They provide information which the speaker assumes will help the hearer identify a particular
referent out of a larger group of possible referents. The contrast, which is quite subtle in most
cases, becomes clearer when the head being modified is a proper noun (e.g. 200c.) In this
case, the proper name apparently is assumed to be sufficient identification to single out this in-
dividual from any others. Adding a restrictive relative clause is unacceptable unless there are
several persons named John from which to choose.3
3As was mentioned in the discussion on noun phrases (3.1), Arawak often uses definite articles with proper
names. The presence of the definite article in example 200c has no influence on its unacceptability. If it is left out,
the clause is still unacceptable.
4.2 Free Relative Clauses 87
That the presence of an overt relative pronoun should influence a restrictive or non-
restrictive interpretation of a relative clause is not unique to Arawak. An overt relative
pronoun in English seems to allow either a restrictive or non-restrictive reading.
(201) a. Restrictive:
b. Non-restrictive:
However, if a relative clause in English lacks a relative pronoun, or contains the complementizer
‘that’ in its COMP position, only the restrictive reading seems to be possible.
(202) a. Restrictive:
b. Non-restrictive:
In addition to the relative clauses mentioned in the preceding section, Arawak has what
appear to be free relative clauses—that is, relative clauses without overt lexical heads. No-
tice, for example, the similarity in structure between the free relative clause in the English
sentence below, and an equivalent one in an Arawak sentence.
As in English, free relative clauses in Arawak have a structure almost identical to that of
other relative clauses, and they do not seem to be associated with the head of any particu-
lar noun phrase. Instead, they seem to function in the place of whole noun phrases. Like
other relative clauses, they contain appropriate subject- and object-relativizing suffixes
and, optionally, may have an explicit relative pronoun.
88 Relative Clauses
(204) a. As subject:
b. As direct object:
c. As direct object:
d. As object of a postposition:
Whether these relative clauses are, in fact, free or lexically headed is not certain. Every
clause in Arawak which appears to be a free relative clause starts with a word which
might, in fact, be interpreted as a pronominal head. That is, as in the above examples, the
apparent free relative clauses all start with a relative pronoun, a number, or an article.
The latter two might be taken to be the determiners of noun phrases. However, this is not
necessarily the case. The Arawak definite articles are all morphologically identical with
pronouns of the same number and gender (see Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2), and numerals can
also function as heads of noun phrases.
A further bit of evidence that the determiners of free relative clauses may, in fact, be pro-
nominal heads is that the presence of the initial relative pronoun, article, or number is
obligatory. This contrasts with the fact that indefinite (non-mass) noun phrases in Arawak
are acceptable without an indefinite article or a number when the exact number of items
or referents is not relevant or when a plural suffix is used on the head noun.
4.3 Embedded Questions 89
b. Wa-dykha hime.
We-see fish
‘We saw fish.’
b. *Wa-dykha andy-n-thi.
*we-see arrive-SUB-WH.SUBJ
*‘We saw the arriver.’
Although the above facts make it seem possible that these free relative clauses are simply
normal relative clauses with pronominal heads, this may not be the best analysis. It is also
possible to analyze them as nominalized clauses. All of the above ‘free’ relative clauses
contain an element not found in other relative clauses—the subordinating suffix -n (glossed
‘SUB’ in all the preceding examples), and it may be that this suffix should be viewed as a
nominalizer. This same suffix appears on the verb in non-relative complement clauses and
also whenever a clause appears in the TOPIC position of a sentence. Furthermore, when a
clause appears in the TOPIC position of a sentence, it is preceded by an article (see Section
3.2.1.2 on sentence structure).
Embedded questions look like relative clauses, except that they do not have any of the sub-
ject- or object-relativizing suffixes, characteristic of relative and free relative clauses, on their
main verb. Furthermore, this lack of a relativization suffix correlates with the obligatory pres-
ence of a question word or phrase in these same clauses. Like the free relative clauses in the
previous section, these clauses all contain verbs with the subordinating suffix -n.
In spite of the similarity in appearance to relative clauses and free relative clauses, the
above clauses should not be analyzed as belonging to either group. These clauses occur
only as sentential complements for verbs of saying and thinking like eithin ‘to know’, akan
‘to tell’, and onabyn ‘to answer’. Furthermore, except for the presence of the subordinating
suffix,4 their form is identical to that of independent content question clauses.
Figure 21 summarizes the occurrence of the subject- and object-relativizer suffixes, the
subordinator suffix, and WH-words in the various constructions discussed in the previous pages.
Preceding sections have given a number of examples of relativized subjects and direct
objects, but there has been no discussion of exactly which constituents are accessible to
relativization. As is the case with most languages, Arawak places restrictions on what con-
stituents can be relativized with a given strategy. The following sections briefly discuss
how Arawak functions in this regard.
When the subject of a clause is relativized, the main verb of the clause is marked with
the subject-relativizing suffix -thi (WH.SUBJ) if that subject is masculine, or with the
non-masculine suffix -tho (WH.SUBJ) if it is non-masculine.5 This is true for both event
verbs and stative verbs. For example, in (210a), wadili ‘man’ is masculine and requires -thi
on the verb, whereas kabajaha ‘tick’ is classified as non-masculine and therefore requires
-tho (in 210b). Simularly, in (210c) a masculine suffix is required, while in (210d) the ref-
erent is non-masculine.
(210) a. Masculine:
4The presence of the subordinating suffix also causes some adjustments in the last vowel of the verb stem. See
b. Non-masculine:
c. Masculine:
Li [› tojo-thi] anda.
He [› mature-WH.SUBJ] arrive
‘The old, respected man arrived.’
d. Non-masculine:
To [› tojo-tho] anda
it/she [› mature-WH.SUBJ] arrive
‘The old, respected woman arrived.’
The relative pronoun corresponding to the subject of the relative clause may or may not
be present if the clause is in the post-head position of the noun phrase.6
When the direct object of a clause is relativized in Arawak, the main verb of the clause
receives the suffix -sia (WH.OBJ). Unlike the subject-relativizer suffixes, the object-
relativizing suffix is not differentiated as to the grammatical gender of the referent.
6See Sections 3.1.4 and 3.1.6 for the discussion of pre- and post-head relative clauses.
92 Relative Clauses
Again, whenever any of the above relative clauses occurs in a post-head position, an
overt relative pronoun may be optionally present.
As mentioned in the discussion of event sentence structure (Section 3.2.1) the indirect
object of a clause is almost always found in a postpositional phrase with the benefactive
postposition myn ‘to/for’. Such indirect objects can be relativized by simply omitting the
noun phrase from its position as the object of the postposition myn, thus stranding the
postposition.
Relative clauses like the above are also acceptable with an overt relative pronoun.
As mentioned earlier (Section 3.2.1), Arawak seems to sometimes allow bare indirect ob-
jects without a postposition. Indirect objects in such constructions cannot be relativized.
(216) *Li wadili [Jan sika › to hala miakaboan] osa jada-nro miaka.
*the man [John give › the bench day.before.yesterday] go trip-toward yesterday)
*‘The man John gave the bench to the day before yesterday went on a trip yesterday.’
Relativizing the NP in an indirect object postpositional phrase (see above) is the only in-
stance where the object of a postpositional phrase can be relativized with stranding of the
postposition. Objects of other postpositions cannot be directly relativized.
The contrast between the acceptability of relativizing the noun phrase in an indirect ob-
ject postpositional phrase and its unacceptability in other postpositional phrases shows up
even more clearly when one considers examples of the benefactive use of the postposition
myn. In addition to being used to indicate an indirect object, myn is also used in the sort of
benefactive phrases that can be added to almost any event clause.
When myn is used as a benefactive in this way, rather than to indicate the indirect object,
then it acts like any other postposition and cannot be stranded.
The locative postpositional phrases associated with verbs of motion such as osyn ‘to go’
and andyn ‘to arrive’ also seem to be part of the VP,7 and yet the postpositions of those
phrases cannot be stranded, either.
motion verb and the locative for which it subcategorizes. See Sections 3.2.1.3 for a discussion of event sentence
structure.
94 Relative Clauses
Perhaps what is of concern is how closely a postpositional phrase is associated with the
verb. Arawak appears to only allow stranding of the postposition of the postpositional
phrase most closely tied to the verb—the indirect object postposition myn. One piece of ev-
idence in Arawak that the indirect object is more closely tied to the verb is that Arawak
verbs of motion subcategorize for, but do not absolutely require, the presence of a locative
postpositional phrase. The subcategorization of the verb seems to be stronger for the indi-
rect object than for a locative phrase. For example, sentences such as
(223) a. L-osa.
he-go
‘He went/left.’
b. L-anda.
he-arrive
‘He arrived.’
without locative phrases are acceptable even without a discourse context.8 Verbs like sikin
‘to give’, on the other hand, can omit mention of their indirect object only if the previous
discourse context makes it perfectly clear who the recipient (indirect object) is. Thus, the
sentence
One other related possibility for explaining the acceptability of stranding the indirect ob-
ject postposition, but not locative ones within the VP, is to consider exactly what is being
subcategorized for by the verb. Motion verbs subcategorize for an entire locative phrase,
postposition and all. The specific locative information given by the postposition is crucial
to the meaning of the clause. In the case of ditransitive verbs, however, the indirect object
postposition seems to add nothing to the meaning of the sentence. It is only the object of
that postposition which is important.
Perhaps one way to represent these facts syntactically is to propose that the indirect ob-
ject NP is a semantic complement of the ditransitive verb and therefore directly governed
8However, semantically, a very generic locative notion like ‘here’ or ‘there’ is still present.
4.4 Constituents Accessible to Relativization 95
by it—in spite of the presence of the postposition myn. For motion verbs, on the other
hand, it is the entire postpositional phrase which is the complement, and the verb governs
that entire phrase.9
Arawak has at its disposal several strategies that can be employed to avoid stranding of
postpositions. One of these strategies seems equivalent to what, in English, has been called
“Pied Piping” (Ross 1967). That is, instead of stranding the postposition, the whole
postpositional phrase can be fronted to the LSAP position of a clause. In all such cases in
Arawak, the relative pronoun representing the object of the postposition (e.g. ama ‘what’,
alikan ‘who’, alon ‘where’) must be used and is found in the normal position for that object,
i.e. immediately preceding the postposition.
Pied Piping can also occur with indirect object postpositional phrases, even though the
indirect object postposition myn can be stranded (see discussion in 4.4.4.1).
Another strategy for not stranding a postposition is to turn the postpositional phrase into a
stative verb phrase. As mentioned previously,10 postpositions may be used as stative verbs.
This kind of verb can be used as the main verb of a two-argument stative clause. The object of
this stative clause can then be relativized in much the same way as the direct object of a transi-
tive event clause—basically, by moving it and adding the suffix -sia ‘WH.OBJ’ to the verb. The
9Thus one finds locative words which are equivalent to whole locative phrases, for example:
L-osa jon.
he-go there
‘He went there.
10See Section 2.4.2.2 on derived stative verbs and Section 3.2.3.2 on stative clause structure.
96 Relative Clauses
relevant relative pronoun (ama ‘what’, alon ‘where’, or alikan ‘who’) must appear in the LSAP
position of this relative clause unless other adjustments are made to the clause (see below).
It is possible to omit the relative pronoun in the LSAP position of the above relative
clauses only if one adds a ka- ‘ATTR’ or ma- ‘PRIV’ prefix11 to the verb, i.e. the verb formed
from the postposition. Significantly, no such requirement holds for relative pronoun omis-
sion in the case of non-derived stative clauses.
Why this ka- or ma- is required in the above clauses when the relative pronoun is omitted
and what it is syntactically is a bit of a puzzle.
11These prefixes are labeled attributive and privative because they appear to be similar in function to the ka-
and ma- which can be used to derive an attributive or privative stative verb from many nouns. In the case of
stative verbs derived from nouns, they signal that the subject of the clause is in the affirmative or negative state of
having or possessing whatever the prefix ka- or ma- is attached to. See Section 2.4.2.2 on derived stative verbs.
For example,
Ka-sikoa-ka-i.
ATTR-house-INDIC-he
‘He is with house (i.e. he is in the state of having a house).’
Ma-sikoa-ka-i.
PRIV-house-INDIC-he
111111
‘He is not with house (i.e. he is in the state of not having a house).
4.4 Constituents Accessible to Relativization 97
The most likely possibility is that the ka- and ma- prefixes act like personless, genderless
resumptive pronouns. In general, the only prefixes which occur in Arawak are the mor-
phologically bound pronouns and the privative and attributive prefixes ka- and ma-, respec-
tively. Ka- and ma- always occur in the same position as the morphologically bound
pronouns occur and are mutually exclusive with them. Furthermore, both in these stative
relative clauses, and when they are used with stative verbs derived from nouns, the head of
the relative clause is always coreferential with the pronoun which would occur in the posi-
tion of ka- or ma- if these prefixes were not present. Thus, in the preceding examples, ka-
and ma- are located exactly where the pronouns representing ‘gourd’ and ‘bench’ would oc-
cur if the objects of these clauses were not relativized, and ‘gourd’ and ‘bench’ are the
heads for these relative clauses.
Even assuming the prefixes in question are resumptive pronouns, the question remains
why they should be obligatory in these relative clauses. The facts (summarized in Figure
22), again, are these: The object of a stative clause based on a postposition may be
relativized by leaving a trace in the position of the object and using a relative pronoun in
LSAP (example 231a). It is also possible to omit the relative pronoun in LSAP if one adds a
‘resumptive pronoun’ prefix to the verb (example 231b). It is unacceptable either to use
the relative pronoun with a resumptive pronoun (example 231c) or to use neither (example
231d).
[ N [ LSAP [ [ NP V ] NP ]]]
NP S S VP
(a) bench › ka-
(b) bench WH ›
(c) *bench WH ka-
(d) *bench › ›
Figure 22. Object Relativization in Stative Clauses
present, there is no trace available for the relative pronoun in LSAP to bind, and therefore
the clause is unacceptable. Since I know of no data in Arawak which contradict this princi-
ple, it is not unreasonable to assume something like it applies.
The problem remains, however, why clauses (e.g. 231d) that have neither a relative pro-
noun in LSAP nor a resumptive pronoun in object position are bad. It does seem to be the
case that the lack of both the relative pronoun and the resumptive pronoun presents a
problem in perception. That is, hearers of such sentences miss the head-modifier interpre-
tation and apparently assume the NP head is actually in the object position of the sentence.
This is true in spite of the presence of the object-relativizer suffix -sia on the verb. Why
this should occur in these clauses is not clear. In event sentences, traces in object and sub-
ject position are properly governed by the verb and INFL, respectively, and both subjects
and objects can be properly governed without the presence of a relative pronoun.12 How-
ever, a trace in object position in these stative sentences based on postpositions is unac-
ceptable unless there is an explicit relative pronoun present.
There is yet another strategy employed in Arawak to avoid stranding a postposition.
This is to incorporate the postpositional phrase into a pre-head relative clause.13
The exact composition of this pre-head clause is not immediately obvious. Balytyn ‘to sit’
is an intransitive verb and therefore cannot normally receive the object-relativizer suffix
-sia. Furthermore, the relativized NP is the word for ‘bench’ and, at least at first glance, one
would expect its trace to be in the object position of the postposition diako ‘on’.
The only explanation which seems plausible is that re-analysis of some sort has taken place
making hala ‘bench’ the object of balyta ‘sit’.
Applying this type of analysis to Arawak would both explain the presence of the object-
relativizer suffix on the verb and ensure that the trace of the object is properly governed
(as defined previously). However, this analysis is not quite as clean as it would be in a
prepositional language. Arawak has postpositions rather than prepositions, and therefore
the postposition is not adjacent to the verb at the time of re-analysis. This means the
postposition cannot simply be incorporated into the verb.
12See discussion on the ECP in Arawak (3.2.2.3), and sections on subject- and object-relativization (4.4.1,
4.4.2).
13Strangely enough, the post-head version of this relative clause is only marginally acceptable:
Introduction
An adequate description of some aspects of Arawak syntax seems to require reference to levels of
the language above that of the sentence. One such case has already been alluded to: full NPs may
be used as subjects only when introducing an entity into the discourse for the first time. Thereafter,
a morphologically free or bound pronoun must be used, linked to an appositive full noun phrase
where disambiguation is required. Although an exhaustive treatment of the contribution of
text-level syntax would far exceed the scope of this description of Arawak, in the following sections
I will exemplify its contribution by concentrating on the use of tense/aspect suffixes and particles.
Throughout the following sections, frequent reference is made to several Arawak narrative texts.
Those most frequently cited may be found in their entirety in the appendix, and will be referred to as The
Bus Trip Story, The Jaguar Story, The Bomb Story, The Tapir Story, and The Metamorphosis Story.
The narrative is one of several monologue genres in Arawak. In the present study, I will adopt the
typology of texts developed by Longacre (1976). He (pp. 195–210) classifies monologues into four
“deep structure genres,” as he calls them, based on the intersection of the features [+/– Succession]
and [+/–Projected]: narrative discourses, procedural discourses, expository discourses, and horta-
tory discourses1 (Figure 23). Succession refers to the fact that certain discourses are built around a
chronological succession, while others are not. Thus he lists narrative and procedural monologues
as having the property [+ Succession], while expository and hortatory have the feature [–Succes-
sion]. The feature [+/– Projected] also has to do with time—not temporal sequence, however, but
whether the discourse is “rooted in real time.”
We may then form the proportion: procedural is to narrative as hortatory is to
expository. Narrative discourse is rooted in real time; it recounts events sup-
posed to have happened somewhere, whether in the real or in an imaginary
world... Procedural discourse tells us how something would be done whenever it
happens to be done. It is in projected rather than accomplished time. Likewise,
while expository discourse simply explains a body of subject matter, hortatory
discourse tells us how we are to act in regard to a certain body of subject matter.
1Longacre has since revised and amplified this classification system (Longacre 1983:4–14). He now includes
“agent orientation” as an additional feature which gives him eight genres. This revised classification does not
substantially affect the discussions herein.
100
Introduction 101
–PROJECTED +PROJECTED
NARRATIVE PROCEDURAL
+SUCCESSION 1. 1/3 person 1. non-specific person
2. agent oriented 2. patient oriented
3. accomplished time 3. projected time
4. chronological linkage 4. chronological linkage
EXPOSITORY HORTATORY
–SUCCESSION 1. no necessary person reference 1. 2 person
2. (subject matter oriented) 2. Addressee oriented
3. time not focal 3. (Mode, not time)
4. logical linkage 4. logical linkage
As mentioned above, the stories cited most often in the following sections are all narra-
tives. To avoid having to continually restate the general contexts of the stories, below is a
brief synopsis of each. (See the appendix for the complete stories.)
1. The Bus Trip Story: This story was written by an Arawak about an unsuccessful
bus trip he took with his wife and several other villagers. The story is true, and
took place less than a week before it was written. This is what the author relates:
Someone in the village bought an old bus. A number of friends, including the
story’s author, piled into the bus and went on a test ride. After several break-
downs, the bus finally quit completely, and the author and his wife had to walk
home.
2. The Jaguar Story: This story was written by an Arawak about a time when a jag-
uar almost “grabbed” the author’s brother-in-law. The story is true and took place
a number of years before it was written. In it, the author tells of going to his field
to work. His brother-in-law and the brother-in-law’s grandchildren were working
in a nearby field. A jaguar tried to attack the brother-in-law. Neither the
brother-in-law nor the author had his gun along, so one of the grandchildren
fetched his father (the brother-in-law’s son) who finally lured and shot the jaguar.
3. The Bomb Story: This story was written by an Arawak about true events a number
of years after World War II. During the War, the U.S. military had a base and a
practice range in Suriname near the author’s village. The story begins some years
after the military left. The author and a friend went on a fishing trip and came
across a strange, heavy object with handles. They took it along with them, but it
got too heavy to carry. Leaving it behind, they went fishing. On the way home af-
ter fishing, they picked up the object and carried it a ways. When it again got too
heavy for them, they tossed it aside, and it exploded. No one was hurt, but it did
scare them.
4. The Tapir Story: This story is an oral story transcribed from tape by me, and later
slightly edited by an Arawak to remove some false starts. The teller of the story
was the oldest man of the village Powakka, who tells the village captain (highest
figure in the village hierarchy) about how he shot a tapir. The story is very vividly
told and includes various sound effects. The captain frequently interjects comments
and questions during the telling of the story.
102 Aspectual Particles and the Contribution of Discourse to Arawak Syntax
5. The Metamorphosis Story: This story was written by an Arawak and is a traditional
tale of the origin of one of the Arawak clans, the Biswana clan. In the story, a man
is living alone in the forests with his dog. Whenever he goes hunting, the dog re-
moves its skin and becomes a beautiful young woman who prepares food and drink
for him. Before he returns, she again becomes a dog. After several episodes of go-
ing hunting and returning to find food, the hunter decides to find out who is mak-
ing it. He pretends to leave again, but returns early to see the dog taking off its
skin. Sneaking into the house, the hunter throws the skin into the fire and takes
the woman as wife. The word for metamorphosis in Arawak is besonoan which is
said to be the word behind the clan name Biswana.
Previous sections dealing with the morphology of the verb listed, without much discus-
sion, the meaning and order of the various verb affixes. In the section on “functors”
(2.6.2.2), several tense-like particles were mentioned and their meanings given. Of these,
the ones which are of concern here are just those suffixes and particles relevant to time,
tense, and aspect as listed in Figure 24.2 The glosses associated with the particles and af-
fixes in the figure apply when the items are used in isolated utterances; a more detailed
analysis is presented in later sections.
VERB SUFFIXES
PARTICLES
Up to this point, in all the discussions dealing with verb affixes, I have not separated nor
really discussed the categories of tense and aspect. Even the glosses given to the suffixes in
Figure 24 combine elements of what are traditionally treated separately as tense and as-
pect. This was not done because the difference between tense and aspect is insignificant, or
2The tense/aspect verb suffixes are integral parts of the verb word. They occur in a fixed order with respect to
other verb suffixes. Particles, on the other hand, have a freer distribution, and occur outside the complex of
morphemes comprising the verb word.
5.1 Tense/Aspect Suffixes and Particles 103
because it is insignificant in Arawak, but because the morphemes in Arawak used to en-
code tense and aspect seem to represent combinations of both.
As is done by Comrie (1985) and others (cf. Grimes 1975; Reichenbach 1947), for the
purposes of this discussion I will assume that time can be represented as a straight line. On
this line is a point labeled “S” which represents the moment of speech (the present). The
portion of the line to the left of the moment of speech represents the past, and the portion
to the right represents the future (Figure 25).
<—————————————————- |——————————————————>
past S future
present
Figure 25. Representation of Time
Following Comrie (and many others), I will also assume there are basically two ways one
can relate a situation (generic for state, action, event, etc.) to the time line. One can speak
of locating a situation somewhere on the time line with respect to some other point on the
time line, such as the moment of speech, or one can speak of the internal temporal contour
of the situation, apart from its location on the time line. Comrie refers to the former as
“tense” and the latter as “aspect.” Tense, then, always has to do with whether a situation
is before, simultaneous with, or after some point on the line. Aspect, on the other hand,
has to do with questions such as duration, completion, or non-completion.
Many utterances place the “situation” they are about somewhere on the time line with
respect to the moment of speech (S).
In Arawak, the tense particles bi ‘immediate past’, bona ‘intermediate past’, and koba ‘distant past’
do exactly that. They place the situation on the time line with respect to the moment of speech.
Other utterances, however, seem to place situations on the time line with respect to some
other point or span on the line specified by the context of the utterance.
Comrie (following others such as Reichenbach 1947) therefore proposes that a second
point is needed on the time line which he calls “reference point” and labels ‘R’. Utterances
which position themselves on the time line with respect to the moment of speech (S) are
said to have “absolute tense,” whereas those which position themselves with respect to a
reference point (R) are said to have “relative tense” with respect to the event (E).
Even in English, relative tense does not function just among clauses within a single sen-
tence. For example, Grimes (1975:76) points out that a sentence in the English historical
present such as
(236) First he goes and finds the girl, then he shows her the ring.
As will be shown in later sections, the Arawak verb suffixes all indicate relative tense ac-
cording to the above definition. That is, in Arawak the context established by the discourse
sets up a reference point on the time line, and the suffixes locate a situation (E) with re-
spect to that point (R), not with respect to the point of speech (S). The tense particles, on
the other hand, are absolute tense particles, and locate events with regard to ‘S’.
Relative tense necessitates having to deal with the discourse context in which an utter-
ance is found and therefore complicates trying to isolate the components of meaning in
these suffixes. Fortunately, it is possible to skirt this problem to some extent. Isolated ut-
terances in Arawak seem to assume that the reference point on the time line for the utter-
ance is in the same location as the point of speech. This means that in isolated utterances
the distinction between relative and absolute tense disappears.
Assuming that tense and aspect are distinguishable from each other (and neutralizing for the mo-
ment the distinction between absolute and relative tense), it is possible to investigate the compo-
nents of meaning in the Arawak verb suffixes in Figure 24. Although there are additional overtones
in the meanings of the affixes, it appears that they can all be characterized by the intersection of a
set of tense features and aspect features (Figure 27). Each of the affixes says something about the lo-
cation of a situation with respect to a point on the time line. Each of the affixes also views the situa-
tion either from the outside as a whole, with no indication of internal composition, or from inside as
a situation which is in some sense in progress. This difference in the way of looking at the situation
corresponds quite well with the aspects Comrie (1976) labels the perfective and the imperfective.
With regard to the perfective aspect, he says:
The whole of the situation is presented as a single unanalyzable whole, with begin-
ning, middle, and end rolled into one; no attempt is made to divide this situation
up into the various individual phases that make up the action. (Comrie 1976:3)
With regard to the imperfective aspect, he says it is concerned with the internal temporal
structure of a situation, viewing a situation from within (Comrie 1976:24). He further
notes that it can include subdivisions such as habitual, continuous, and progressive.
ASPECT
Perfective Imperfective
Future -fa -bia
TENSE Present -ka -bo
Past -› -ja
Figure 27. Tense and Aspect of Verb Suffixes
Just characterizing the Arawak verb suffixes in terms of tense and aspect features does not
tell how they should be used nor how they translate into another language, like English, in a
consistent and straightforward way. Tense and aspect in some of the forms interact with the
type of situation described by the verb to give a composite meaning slightly different from
what one might expect. For example -ka ‘present perfective’ relates a stative or event verb to
the (relative) present. Its aspect views the situation from the outside as a completed whole
without regard to internal composition. When this affix is applied to stative verbs, it expresses
a situation which, in English, would be translated by the present tense.3
3From this point onward in this chapter, the tense/aspect suffix glosses will reflect the analysis in Figure 27.
5.1 Tense/Aspect Suffixes and Particles 105
b. Khareme-ka no.
black-PRES.PERF it
‘It is black.’
c. Bahy loko-ka-i.
house in-PRES.PERF-he
‘He is in the house.’
d. Kawa-ka-i.
absent-PRES.PERF-he
‘He is gone.’
If one applies the same -ka suffix to an event verb, however, the meaning one gets says
something about both the past and the present. The participants of such a verb are in the
(relative) present, in the state of having completed the action of the verb; and the effects of
the verb, if any, are still true. In that sense, it is in the present tense. On the other hand,
since the event is now complete, the time span for that action must, of necessity, have
taken place in the past. For a verb such as ka ‘bathe’, where the states before (e.g. dirty)
and after (e.g. clean) can be viewed as different, the Arawak present perfective can be
translated in a straightforward way by the English present perfective.
(238) Da-ka-ka.
I-bathe-PRES.PERF
‘I have bathed.’
However, the English translation of the Arawak present perfective of an event verb such as
yjin ‘to weep’, where a change of state is less clearly evident, almost makes it seem as if -ka
is a past tense suffix. That is, in most situations where it occurs, it is more naturally trans-
lated by the English past tense.
(239) Th-yja-ka.
she-weep-PRES.PERF
‘She wept.’
Nevertheless, for Arawak, what is in focus is that, at the (relative) present moment, the
person is in the state of having done the action of weeping.
The suffixes labeled ‘Imperfective’ in Figure 27 also deserve some comments. As was men-
tioned above, each of these suffixes views the situation from the inside—that is, from the middle
of the action of the situation. This, again, interacts with the type of situation being described, as
well as with the tense of the situation. The present imperfective suffix -bo views the action ex-
pressed by an event verb from the inside in the present. This gives a continuous meaning.
(240) Da-dalhida-bo.
he-run-PRES.IMPF
‘He is running.’
106 Aspectual Particles and the Contribution of Discourse to Arawak Syntax
However, when this suffix is applied to a stative verb, where no action is inherent in the
verb itself, it gets the progressive meaning of being in the state expressed by the verb,
where that state is intensifying.
This latter meaning is close to that which is expressed by the future imperfective suffix
-bia. If this suffix is applied to a stative verb, it has an inchoative meaning. The state ex-
pressed by the verb is not present yet, but will be coming or is in the process of coming
into existence.
The use of this suffix does not imply, however, that the state expressed by the verb will
ever be reached (as -fa ‘future perfective’ does.) This is true when it is used with event
verbs also. In fact, the uncertainty of the outcome of the situation expressed by the verb
allows this aspect/tense to be exploited to express the concept of ‘in order to’ in Arawak.
One of the problems in describing the tense/aspect verb suffixes in Arawak is that, while
their meanings seem to be clear in isolated utterances, yet in the context of other sen-
tences, their meanings seem to shift. For example, the present imperfective, future perfec-
tive, and imperfective suffixes -bo, -fa and -bia, respectively, are found in narratives where
they are all clearly relating past situations when the location of the situation on a time line
is considered relative to the moment of speech. Thus in the Bus Story, just at the point the
bus starts breaking down, all three of the above suffixes and the simple past and present
perfective occur within the space of three adjacent sentences.
As mentioned earlier, a narrative is built around a series of events. Progress in the story
can be viewed in terms of moving the relative event pointer (‘E’ in Figure 26) forward (to
the right) on the time line.
At the point that an author or speaker starts a narrative, the relative event pointer (E) is
located at the same position on the time line as the moment of speech (S). The author can
then use one of two means to move E relative to S. One of these means is to use an explicit
time adverbial such as miaka ‘yesterday’ or an expression such as ‘one Sunday’. For exam-
ple, in the Bus Story, the author starts with
The other means is to use an absolute tense particle with or without a time adverbial to further
specify the time. For example, other stories establish their starting points as follows:
Once the relative event pointer E has been established, some clauses cause movement of E, while
others do not. The tense/aspect suffixes seem to be crucial in determining this movement. For
example, the suffix -bo ‘present imperfective’ can be used nearly anywhere in a discourse when
the author intends to relate an event that occurs over a span of time but does not want to advance
the pointer. Clauses with this affix tend to convey the setting up of explanatory information.
Thus in the Jaguar Story, the author mentions going to the creek near which he rested, and at
that point he adds, by way of explanation, that there is where he was working.
A bit later in the same story, after the brother-in-law and his grandchildren had come to
the field, the author says:
In this last passage, only the last sentence causes movement along the time line. The cut-
ting of the cane, working in the field, and thinking are all part of the background or back-
drop upon which the central events happen. This means that the various tense/aspect
suffixes seem to have to do not only with movement or lack of movement along the time
line, but also with the types of information conveyed.
A number of investigators (e.g. Grimes 1975; Longacre 1976 and 1983; Hopper 1979) have
documented various types of information in a discourse. One of the most widely recognized
distinctions is between what may be called “foreground” and “background” information.4
It is evidently a universal of narrative discourse that in any extended text an
overt distinction is made between the language of the actual story line and the
language of supportive material which does not itself narrate the main events.
(Hopper 1979:213)
Those parts of a narrative which belong to the skeletal structure of the discourse (e.g. the
temporal succession of events in a narrative) are the “foreground,” while those which do
not belong to the skeletal structure are “background.”
Hopper (e.g. 1979, 1982) and others (e.g. Jones and Jones 1984; Li, Thompson, and
Thompson 1982) have documented a number of languages in which there is a strong corre-
lation between the aspect of sentences and whether they present foreground or background
information. Sentences in the perfective aspect almost always seem to present foreground
information, while imperfective sentences are associated with background information.
This is not to say these are the only signals for foregrounding or backgrounding. For exam-
ple, Hopper (1979) also discusses the correlation of these concepts with word order and
4Terminology for these types of information varies. For example, Longacre (1984:14ff.) calls these “main line”
and “supportive,” respectively.
5.2 Tense/Aspect in Narrative Discourse 109
Like Hopper, Grimes (1975) also distinguishes the main succession of events in a narra-
tive from other information. However, his taxonomy of those kinds of information is finer
grained. In particular, he (1975:51–70) distinguishes the following types of information in
a narrative:
1. Setting Information: when, where, and under what circumstances actions take
place.
2. Background Information: information which is not part of the narrative itself, but
stands outside it and clarifies it.
3. Evaluative Information: information which tells how the speaker feels about the
state of the world at a particular point in the narrative.
4. Collateral Information: information which, instead of telling what did happen, tells
what did not happen.
Grimes points out that each of these types of information in a particular language may in-
volve distinctive grammatical constructions. For example, he mentions that setting infor-
mation typically involves time and locative expressions, and collateral information often
involves negatives, adversatives, and questions such as yes-no questions. Tense displace-
ment (i.e. relative tense) is also characteristic of certain types of information. For example,
Grimes (1975:77ff.) points out that it is characteristic of the antecedent events and fore-
shadowing used in presenting background information. Also, collateral information “in-
volving questions and predictions regularly signals displacement into the future” (p. 77).
In Arawak, the suffix -bia ‘future imperfective’ seems to be associated with background
information (in Grimes’ sense) of the foreshadowing type. That is, it is generally used with
statements of very generic events which then provide the framework within which the ac-
tual succession of events in the narrative are presented. For example, it is used twice in
the Bus Story. One of these times is in the last sentence of the introduction, just as the trip
is about to start:
110 Aspectual Particles and the Contribution of Discourse to Arawak Syntax
All the events following this sentence, up to the breakdown of the bus, are covered by the
word ‘go’ to which the -bia is attached. The second occurrence of this suffix is just before
the return home:
Again, the events following this sentence represent a spelling out in detail of the going
back. Similarly, in the Jaguar Story, the sentence introducing the sequence concerned with
the successful killing of the jaguar is as follows:
The whole of the hunting sequence that follows may be subsumed under this sentence.
As has already been implied, the various types of information are not evenly distributed
in a discourse. Thus, one obvious statement that could be made is that, in a narrative, one
would typically expect to find more setting information near the beginning of the narrative
as a whole, or near the beginning of major sections in the narrative, than in the middle of
the heat of the action. The distribution of other types of information is not as obvious.
Nevertheless, there are consistent patterns which emerge. For example, Labov and
Waletsky (1967) discuss the occurrence of what they call “evaluative” statements at the
suspension point in English between the complication part of a narrative and the resolu-
tion. One way to describe parts of a narrative and the distribution of various types of
information in them is in terms of plot structure.
A number of authors have dealt with plot structure. Perhaps one of the first to do a close
analysis was Propp (1928) who dealt with the structure of folk or fairy tales. More re-
cently, others such as Grimes (1975) and Longacre (1976, 1983) have dealt with plot on a
rather abstract level, and yet others (e.g. various articles in Longacre 1984) have published
studies about, and relating to, plot structure in specific languages.
Longacre (1976:197ff. and 1983:20ff.) posits the existence of both “surface struc-
ture” and “deep structure” plots and a mapping of the one to the other. The deep
structure plot is viewed in some sense as a language universal for narrative dis-
course. 5 The specifics of the surface structure plot may have language-particular
characteristics, and may also show variation from narrative to narrative. In the fol-
lowing discussion, I assume an analysis of plot essentially like Longacre’s.
5This is not to exclude other discourse genres. “Something like plot characterizes other forms of discourse than
narrative” (Longacre 1976:212). For example, he mentions: “There are plot-like elements in procedural
discourse. We may think of the whole procedural discourse as reflecting a struggle to accomplish the goal of
discourse, to carry through an activity, or to produce a product” (Longacre 1983:38).
5.2 Tense/Aspect in Narrative Discourse 111
One of the most universally mentioned and commented-upon features of a plot is the pro-
gressive (sometimes steady, sometimes episodic) building toward a climax or peak. The char-
acteristics of this peak have been well documented for a number of languages and include
things such as heightened vividness, changes of pace, changes in average sentence length, con-
centration of participants, and shifts in tense or person orientation (e.g. Longacre 1976, 1984;
Grimes 1975). The building toward the peak is characterized by Longacre and others (e.g.
Jones and Jones 1984; Walrod 1984) as a “knotting up” or “building of tension.” What is
meant by these terms is a combination of rather psychological-sounding factors such as excite-
ment, complication, anticipation, and puzzlement. Although these sound ephemeral, Arawak
speakers use several concrete devices to bring them about.
One of these devices is to use contrastive constructions or constructions which denote
breaks in expectancy chains (cf. Longacre 1976:150ff). For example, note the use of balhin
‘although’ and ma ‘but’ in the following passage taken from the Bus Story.
In the Jaguar Story, when the author is asked for his gun, but on that particular day just
happened to have left it at home, the reader is even alerted to the fact that this was not his
usual practice.
Another tension-building device used is to highlight what might have been (or should
have been or would be) with negative statements and statements implying something other
than the apparent situation. This corresponds well to Grimes’ (1975:64ff) collateral infor-
mation. Thus in the Bomb Story, the author tells of playing with the bomb in blissful un-
awareness of the danger:
Later in the story, he relates returning to the bomb and playing with it again:
contain frequent occurrences of the present imperfective suffix -bo. This is consistent with
the fact that they do not present main events (i.e. foregrounded information). However,
foregrounded events can also contribute toward the building of tension.
One of the puzzles with regard to the use of the tense/aspect suffixes in Arawak has been
the use of the future perfective suffix -fa in discourse.6 Unlike clauses with the imperfective
suffixes which relate background (including foreshadowing), setting, and collateral infor-
mation, clauses with -fa seem to represent foreground information—they relate the main
events. However, -fa clauses are not evenly distributed in a discourse. They almost all oc-
cur just before the peak of a story or episode. My feeling is that using -fa in clauses is an-
other tension-building device. For example, in the Bomb Story, after finding the bomb,
playing with it, leaving it behind to go fishing, and catching fish (all of which are low-
tension), the author suddenly uses -fa a number of times in relating the final events leading
up to the explosion. He uses it in the sentences telling of their arrival at the place they had
left the bomb, his brother carrying it, and lastly the explosion itself.
These sentences are interspersed with other tension-building collateral and evaluative
sentences. Immediately following the last of the above sentences is the actual peak of the
narrative: the explosion of the bomb and the immediate aftermath. It is as though the use
of -fa imparts a sense of anticipation of what is to come.
The tension-building function of the use of -fa ‘future perfective’ prior to the peak of a narra-
tive becomes clearer when it is contrasted with the use of its present counterpart, the suffix -ka
‘present perfective’. Like -fa, -ka appears in clauses relating foreground information. Unlike
-fa, however, clauses with -ka occur in low-tension portions of a narrative. For example, in the
Bomb Story, the first episode consists of finding the bomb, playing with it, subsequently leav-
ing it to go fishing, and fishing. From the point that the bomb is left behind (i.e. after the most
tense part of the first episode) through the fishing scene, up to the point of the arrival back to
the place the bomb was left, the author uses -ka. For example, the two clauses below taken
from this section would be just as acceptable (but not as dramatic) if the -ka were left off.7
6The suffix -fa does not occur in all narratives; but when it occurs, its usage seems to be consistent.
7In some cases, such as in sentences with stative verbs, the use of -ka is required. For example,
De ron ka-bode-ka.
I only ATTR-hook-PRES.PERF
‘Only I had a hook.’
5.2 Tense/Aspect in Narrative Discourse 113
(256) a. Da-bodeda-KA-da.
I-fish-PRES.PERF-EPEN
‘I fished (with a hook)’
What is very striking is that immediately following the sequence of clauses with -ka
is the previously related series of -fa sentences, and thus there is a sharp contrast be-
tween them. In terms of the relative event pointer, just before the author reaches the
peak of a narrative, he seems to suspend its movement along the time line.8 The partic-
ular temporal location he “parks” himself at is just before the most tension-filled events
are about to occur. From this vantage point, he then describes the situation, looking
backward at low-tension events and forward in time to the events directly leading to
the peak. Then, suddenly— Boom! We are in the midst of the peak.
8This is perhaps another manifestation of something like the Labov and Waletsky (1974) “point of suspension.”
Chapter 6
Conclusion
As stated in the introduction, the purpose of this study is primarily to provide a general
description of Arawak as it is spoken in Suriname, South America. There are many limit-
ing factors in such an undertaking, not the least of which are time and energy. For these
and many other reasons, the preceding chapters are incomplete and, probably, flawed in
many respects. Nevertheless, the hope is that it provides enough of a glimpse into this rel-
atively undescribed language to make it useful as a testing ground for linguistic theories of
a more abstract or general nature.
6.1 Summary
In the following paragraphs, I summarize some of the more interesting aspects of Arawak
syntax and semantics that have come to light in the course of this study.
Typologically, Arawak is primarily a right-branching SVO language, except that stative
and attributive sentences have a VS pattern. Most noun modifiers precede their heads, and
the language has postpositions, rather than prepositions. Question words, relative pro-
nouns, and focused constituents appear at the left periphery of the sentence.
Arawak has both free and mophologically bound, pre-head and post-head pronouns. The
pronouns are not marked for grammatical or semantic case, and they have singular and
plural first-, second-, and third-person forms. Arawak definite articles are essentially iden-
tical to the pronouns; and demonstratives incorporate the pronouns as their first
morphological component.
Arawak has a number and gender system which distinguishes the features [+/– human],
[+/– male], and [+/– plural]. The features [+/– human] and [+/– male] are affected by
the speaker’s viewpoint. The feature [+/– plural] is generally significant only for [+hu-
man] referents. This number and gender system is found in its fullest form in the third-
person pronouns. It is also evident to a lesser extent in articles and demonstratives, and it
affects the choice of nominalizing, pluralizing, and relativizing suffixes.
The Arawak counting system is a combination of base-five, base-ten, and base-twenty
numbers. Five is ‘one my hand’; ten is ‘two my hand’; fifteen is ‘one my hand on two my
hand’; twenty is ‘one man’. After this point, the pattern repeats.
(258) bian-loko-diako-bian-da-khabo-diako-bian
two-man-on-two-my-hand-on-two
‘fifty two’
114
6.2 Areas Needing Further Research 115
Arawak distinguishes two main classes of verbs: event verbs and stative verbs. There ap-
pear to be no descriptive adjectives in Arawak; almost all concepts which would be ex-
pressed by adjectives in English are expressed by means of stative verbs in Arawak.
Syntactically, Arawak is a non-pro-drop configurational language.1 Arawak sentences can
have both a TOPIC position and a COMP-like one which I call LSAP (Left Sentence
Adjunction Position). Constituents in the TOPIC position bear no grammatical relationship
to the rest of the sentence, while those in the LSAP do—they are always associated with a
gap elsewhere in the sentence. This makes the LSAP seem very similar to an English
COMP. However, movement of question words, focused constituents, and relative pro-
nouns in Arawak is clause bounded. Arawak also has no generalized complementizer like
English ‘that’.
One of the more interesting aspects of Arawak flows from the description of what hap-
pens to an Arawak sentence when various constituents are fronted to the LSAP. Constitu-
ents such as the direct object, the indirect object, time phrases, and locational phrases can
be questioned or otherwise fronted to the LSAP without further consequences to the struc-
ture of the sentence. However, the questioning or focusing of manner adverbials or negated
verbs is accompanied by the obligatory insertion into the sentence of a semantically empty
“dummy verb,” to which the morphologically bound subject pronoun and tense/aspect
affixes are then attached.
Arawak has both pre-head and post-head relative clauses. Post-head ones generally seem
to be “heavier” than pre-head ones. Pre-head relative clauses never occur with relative pro-
nouns, while post-head ones optionally do. Subject and object relativization is accompa-
nied by the addition of special suffixes to the verb. Arawak, in general, does not allow
postposition stranding when objects of postpositions are questioned or relativized. How-
ever, the indirect object postposition myn can be stranded when its object NP is relativized.
Arawak has a set of six tense/aspect suffixes which, when analyzed along lines proposed
by Comrie (1976, 1985), seem to represent an intersection of the relative past, relative
present, and relative future tenses with the imperfective and perfective aspects. Arawak
also has several particles which represent absolute tense. In addition to simply conveying
temporal and aspectual information, the suffixes and particles are also used to highlight
different kinds of information in a discourse. That is, in narratives there seems to be a cor-
relation between the use of perfective-aspect suffixes with foreground information and the
use of imperfective-aspect suffixes with background information.
There are a number of concerns which deserve fuller treatment than they are given in
this study. One of these relates to the syntax of verbs in Arawak. As mentioned in Section
2.4.1.1, Arawak event verbs have three stem forms: a basic stem, an a-stem, and an
oa-stem. In addition, event (as well as stative) verb stems may receive the causative suffix
-kyty. Each of these forms differs from the corresponding other ones either in the number
of arguments for which it is subcategorized or in the semantic relationship which holds be-
tween it and its arguments, or in both (in addition to the aspectual difference noted in Sec-
tion 2.4.1.1). However, it is not entirely clear how best to describe the regularities.
Another area needing further investigation is that of the use of the various forms of pro-
nominal and nominal reference in Arawak—both on the sentence level and on the dis-
course level. As was mentioned previously, the use of a full NP in subject position in
Arawak is usually restricted to the first time a participant or prop is introduced into a
1See Chomsky 1982a for explanations of these terms.
116 Conclusion
discourse. After that, the speaker uses an appropriate pronoun, or a pronoun with an ap-
positive noun phrase if the pronoun alone would be ambiguous. In either case, the pro-
noun may be either morphologically bound or morphologically free. A morphologically
bound pronoun tends to be used when its antecedent is the last mentioned noun or pro-
noun having the same number and gender, whereas the equivalent morphologically free
pronoun tends to be used when its antecedent is not the last mentioned noun or pronoun,
but has, nevertheless, already been introduced into the discourse.
This description of pronominalization is obviously not complete. In the area of sentence
syntax, more work needs to be done on the description of various co-reference restrictions
and possibilities. The contribution of discourse structure on pronominalization also needs
much more work. The notions of TOPIC and FOCUS may be useful in this regard.
Work also remains to be done in the area of morphology. In particular, words used ad-
verbially contain several suffixes simply glossed ‘ADV’ in this study. The differences be-
tween these suffixes need further investigation. There are also unglossed, unanalyzed,
recurring partials which may be found in, for example, some of the illustrative sentences in
the lexicon (Part 2). In many cases, this is a reflection of the fact that it is often difficult to
detect the difference between sequences of morphemes which have become lexicalized and
sequences of morphemes which represent currently productive processes.
Part 2
Lexicon
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
The lexicon in the following pages contains some of the more common words used in
day-to-day speech by Arawaks. It is by no means complete, and the words included were
chosen randomly from field notes. An effort has been made, however, to include the words
occurring elsewhere in this study.
The illustrative sentences in this lexicon were primarily supplied by Nelis M.
Biswane, a resident of the Arawak village of Cassipora and a mother-tongue speaker of
Arawak. The sentences were originally intended to be incorporated into a dictionary
for Arawaks, not for non-speakers of the language. This means that many of the illus-
trations actually use derived forms of the word in question, rather than the word in its
most simple form.
It should be noted that Arawak has no firm writing tradition. Perhaps because of this,
many words have alternate pronunciations and, in this lexicon, alternate spellings. It
should also be noted that, because of vowel cluster reduction, when a prefix is added to a
word beginning with a vowel, it is difficult to know how best to insert hyphens between
the different morphemes in sample sentences. In the transcriptions, prefixes sometimes ap-
pear to have a different final vowel than expected, and word stems beginning with vowels
often have a different initial vowel or lack their initial vowel altogether.
An effort has been made to include an indication of the lexical class for each word as fol-
lows: vs = verb stative; vi = verb intransitive; vt = verb transitive; vd = verb
ditransitive; n = noun; pp = postposition; art = article; pro = pronoun; quant = quanti-
fier; num = counting number; conj = conjunction; p = particle; rp = relative pronoun;
qw = question word; tw = time word.
The classification of verbs into intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive classes is incom-
plete. For example, some verbs which appear to be a-stem forms (i.e. they end in an) are
nevertheless classified as transitive.1 This reflects both the fact that it is often difficult to
find a context suitable to elicit the basic-stem form and the fact that the morphological dif-
ferences between the basic-stem and the a-stem is not manifested in many environments
(see Section 2.4.1.1.1).
The identification of plant and animal species is also incomplete. In most cases, they are
glossed with a Dutch (D:) or Sranan Tongo (ST:) translation equivalent. The lexicon begins
with alphabetized lists of preffixes and suffixes
118
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 119
ABARO (n): one (non-male). Abaro ron osa-ma da-ma. “Only one (female) can
go with me (e.g. the car is small and there is room for only one).”
ABARO-DIAKO-ANYKY (num, quant): one and a half. Abaro-diako-anyky khisiba
wa-kona-n, w-anda Cordon waboroko amyn. “Walking one and a half
hours, we arrived at the Cordon Road.”
ABARYKY, ABYRYKY (n): other.
ABATHIAN, BATHIAN (quant, num): six.
ABO (n): back (body part). Kari-ka d-abo min kho. “My back hurts a lot. Pos-
sessed: d-abo = my back.
ABO (pp): with (instrumental), by means of. Aba ada lo-soka ly-kasiparan abo.
“He chopped a stick with his machete.”
ABOJA (n): peccary (species) (ST: pakira).
ABOLA, ABALA (n): bench. Tora d-abolan khan diako balytyro b-a. “Just sit on
my bench.” Possessed: d-abola-n = my bench.
ABON (pp): under. By-sika hala abon no. “Put it under the bench.”
ADA (n): wood, tree, stick. Aba firo-tho ada da-koban loko-ka, wadili-ka kho
da-soko-n no. “There is a big tree in my planting ground, I can’t chop it
(down).” Possessed: d-ada-n = my tree.
1. ada-byna: leaf of a tree
2. ada-dynabo: branch of a tree
3. ada-yda: bark of a tree
4. ada-sa: branch, young tree
ADA-DYNABO (n): branch (tree-arm). Ada-dynabo diakhodi halhanron
ajomyndi-tho khota-ha kona-ka. “All sorts of arboreal animals (i.e. those
which fly or climb) walk around on tree branches.”
ADAFE (n): black spider monkey (ST: kwatta).
ADAJALI (n): God. Adianke l-a san malhithi-n Adajali halhan amathali. “God made
everything very well.”
1. Adajali kasakabo: Sunday
ADAJAN (vs): old.
ADAKOTAN (vt): interrogate. B-andy farokha falhetho sibon, aba lokhodi-fa kho
th-adakota-n bo. “If you come before a white man, he is going to interro-
gate you in many ways.”
ADAKOTON (vd): ask, request. B-adakota li dinthi da-myn alikha l-osy-fa
jokhanro. “Ask uncle for me when he is going hunting.”
ADALI KHA (tw): dry season.
1. firo koro hadali: big/long dry season
2. awalhadalithe: short dry season
ADALI, HADALI (n): sun. Bokolho-ho thy-wata, to adali. “The sun dries clothes.”
ADI (pp): above, exceeding (used in comparisons).
ADIA (adv): very.
ADIANKEN (adv): very. Lira da-jothi adiankenma karin. “That (male) family
member of mine is very sick.”
1. adiakhanken: very (diminutive)
ADISA (n): cassava boat (to grate cassava in). D-ansa-ka d-adisara loko. “I grated
cassava in my cassava boat (canoe-like, hollowed-out log for grating
cassava in).” Possessed: d-adisa-ra = my cassava boat.
122 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
ADO(-HO) (n): roof. M-ado-n kha de, min-koma kho oni jojoto-n de. “If I were
without a roof, the rain would wet me greatly.” Possessed: d-ado = my
roof.
ADOTON (vt): cover, roof. Sare b-a adoto-n b-awa, onikhi thy-thebetha-ma b-adi.
“Cover yourself well, or when it rains it will drip on you.”
AFODO(-HO) (n): boss, leader, captain. W-afodo dykhy-thi wa-sikoa khona. “Our
captain watches over our village.”
AITHAN, AITHIN (vt): know, be acquainted with. See: eithin, eithan.
AITHI (n): son (also son of brother). Possessed: d-aithi = my son.
AITHOAN (vi): be careful, watch out. B-aithoa to jadoala myn; by-thikhida-ma
tho-bolokon; thy-thiada-ma bo. “Be careful of the knife; you can fall on its
point; (and) it can stab you."
AJALHO (n): punishment. Ly-thikebe khonaria, l-osa ajalho lokonro. “Due to his
stealing, he went into punishment.”
AJALHODON (vt): punish. See: ajalho.
AJOA (tw): late, later. Ajoaron b-anda-the. “You arrived late.”
AJOMOLHA (n): fish kind (ST: anjoemara).
AJOMYN (vs): high. To hadali moda-the ajomyn. “The sun is climbing high (ap-
proaching noon).”
AJOMYNDI-KORO (n): airplane.
AKAKADYN (vt): tell (e.g. a story), relate, explain. Malhikhotoa-sikoa-n wakhaja
kho malhikhotathi akakady-n na ibilinon. “At school the teacher explains
(everything) to the children well.”
AKAN (vt): speak, tell, say. By-dykha farokha da-sanothi, b-aka khan-li to diahy
na-myn: sa khan koa w-a-n khonan. “If you see our children, you must
tell them this message: It is still going well with us.”
AKHARO, WAKHARO (tw): now, at this moment. See: wakharo.
AKOBAN (vi): rest, take a breather. Min-ka kho methe-n de; d-akoba khan-fa
bania. “I am very tired; I will just go rest a little.”
AKOBON (vi): rest. San bena d-akobo-n khi, d-osa to nekhebo khona khi-da ba.
“After resting thusly well, I went about working again the same way.”
AKOBYN (vi): breathe. Min-ka kho thonolisia-n de; kiadoma da-norokoadia ron
d-akoba. “I have a bad cold; therefore I only breathe through my
mouth.”
ALEKHEBEN, HALEKHEBEN (vs): happy, glad. Min-ka kho alekhebe-n de;
da-jonon dykhy-n-the de. “I am very glad; my family came to see me.”
ALEKHEBETAN (vt): cheer up, make happy.
ALEKHEBETOAN (vi): celebrate, party.
ALIKA, HALIKA (qw, rp): how.
ALIKAN, HALIKAN (qw, rp): who, which person. Alikan khan oma-thi-da bi?
“Who is with you?”
ALIKHA, HALIKHA (qw, rp): when. Alikha andy-thi-da bi? “When did you arrive
(i.e. when were you an arrivee)?”
ALOKOSIAN (vs): thirsty. Alokosia-ka de. “I am thirsty.”
ALON, ANON (qw, rp): where. Alon b-osa-bo? “Where are you going?”
AMA (qw, rp): what. Ama khan ani-thi-bo-the-da bi? “What did you come
doing?”
AMA DIARO (n): nothing.
AMA KHO (n): nothing.
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 123
AMA-RON (qw): what (non-male) ‘Ama-ron amyn-tho-bo to?’ mo-n d-a-na. “‘What
is it with?’ I wondered.”
AMABIA (qw): why (what is the purpose, in order to accomplish what?).
AMADOMA (qw): why (what is the cause).
AMAHAN (qw): what. Ma we kho eitha-bo amahan-da no. “But we didn’t know
what it was.”
AMATHALI (n): something. Lira wadili min-thi kho eithi-n jaty-n amathali. “That
man knows how to draw things very well.”
AMYN (pp): at, by, nearby. Ada amyn-ka-i. “He is by the tree.”
AMYN, AMON (vt): have, possess. B-amy-n-ka nana jokara-bia? “Do you have
pineapple to sell?”
AMYNRO (pp): toward. See: amyn, -ro.
AMYNTYN (vt): approach.
ANABYN (vi): wake up. Bo-joda basada-ren li siokothi abo, m-anaby-n l-a-nbia.
“Swing the little boy slowly (gently) so that he doesn’t wake up.”
ANBALHITOAN (vi): decorate one’s body (e.g. with paint). Wakhili koba
n-alekhebetoa-n-ha na lokonon, n-anbalhitoa-ka. “In the olden days, when
they (Arawaks) would celebrate, they would decorate themselves.”
ANDA...KHONAN (vi): touch, feel. M-andy-n b-a to ikhi khonan. “Don’t touch the
fire.”
ANDADIKE (n): armadillo (species) (ST: kapasi).
ANDYN (vi): arrive. Bakylamanro de ithi anda-the jokha waria. “My father arrives
from hunting in the late afternoon.”
ANIN (vt): do. Lhelhoko ron abo ma-dian b-a, ma b-ani-ra-fa-da no! “Don’t just
talk with the mouth, but do it!”
ANOANA (n): buzzard.
ANON, ALON (qw, rp): where. See: alon.
ANSAN (vi): grate cassava tubers.
ANSIN (vt): like, love, want. D-ansi-n doma da-sa-be-wa, sa da-dykhy-n na-khona.
“Because I love my children, I look after them well.” See: kansin.
ARAKABOSA (n): gun. To d-arakabosa-n: adiakhankentho sa-n bolheidi-n to. “My
gun: it throws (shoots) very well.” Possessed: d-arakabosa-n = my gun.
ARI(-HI) (n): tooth, molar. D-ari abo da-ryda. “With my teeth I bite.” Possessed:
d-ari = my tooth.
ATHA(-HA), YTHAN (n): drink (usually alcoholic). Tora atha-ha min-ka kho
tata-n. “That drink is very strong.” De ythan seme koa-ma. “My drink
(e.g. a barrel of cassava beer) is still sweet (i.e. not fermented yet).”
ATHI (n): pepper (a very hot kind). See: hathi.
ATYNOA (tw): at first.
AWALHADALITHE (tw): short dry season.
AWALHIBANA (n): fish kind (ST: dagoe fisie).
BA (p): again. See: khi ... ba.
BADA(-HA) (n): nail (of finger or toe). Da-bada ma-lhyky-n d-a-n kha, min-koma
kho wadibe-n no. “If I didn’t cut my nails, they would get very long.”
Possessed: da-bada = my nail.
BADAKHABO, ABADAKHABO (quant, num): five (one-my-hand).
BAHA (p): perhaps.
124 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
BAHY (n): house. Da-jonto farokha aba holholho, da-malhithi-fa aba bahy
thy-diako. “If I had a piece of property, I would build a house on it. Pos-
sessed: da-sikoa = my house.
BAJOLHA (n): beam (of building). Da-bajolhan da-thobodasia da-kora khonaria. “I
tie my hammock on my beam.” Possessed: da-bajolha-n = my beam.
BAKYLAMA (tw): late afternoon (16:00–20:00). Bakylama d-osy-ha-the jadoan-ro.
“This afternoon I will go traveling.”
BALA (n): ball, shot (ammunition).
BALADAN (vi): shoot at.
BALALAN (vs): round. Li da-kodoja balala-thi. “My gourd bottle is round.”
BALHA(-HA), (Y)BALHA(-HA) (n): hair, feather. De si khona to balha-ha. “On my
head is hair.” Da-jokha kodibio; da-dykha thy-balha ron thikhidi-n. “I shot
a bird; I saw only its feathers falling.” Possessed: da-balha = my hair.
1. kodibio-balha: feather
BALHA(-HA), (Y)BALHA (n): sea, ocean. Firo-tho iniabo to balha. “The sea is a
big (body of) water.”
BALHAKAROBALI (n): tree (species) (ST: basralokus).
BALHIN (p): although, though, contrastive, CONTR. D-osa bodedan-ro balhin, ma
ama kho da-bode-sia-ka. “Although I went hunting, what I caught was
nothing.”
1. balhin diaro: even if
BALHITAN (vt): need, require. Kabenan ma-dyky-n b-a-n b-ojonoa, min-ka kho
balhita-thi b-a-n je. “When you haven’t seen your own family in a long
time, you have great need of them.”
BALHO (n): ax. Min-ka kho da-balhon ma-mana-n. “My ax is very dull.” Pos-
sessed: da-balho-n = my ax.
BALHOSEN (n): leader, chief, captain.
BALHYDOA (vi): comb one’s hair.
BALIHIN (vs): dirty, filthy (also used to describe stories).
BALIN (vi): happen, take place. Alika th-a-n bali-n to oda-ha, ama kho eitha
sawabo. “How the death happened, no one knows for sure.”
BALIN (vt): pass, pass by. Waboroko aolhe diako-ren thy-bali-ka, to
falhetho-dalhidi-koana, de. “Just at the corner of the road, it, the bus,
passed me.”
BALISI (n): ash. Ikhi-khodo bithonoan siki-sia-tho balisi. “Burning wood gives
ash.” Possessed: da-balisi-a = my ash.
BALYTADAN (n): sit with someone (e.g. to drink).
BALYTYN (vi): sit down. Mera b-a-the jaha; da-dyna-n by-balyta-the. “Quickly,
come here, and sit down next to me (at my arm).”
BANA (n): leaf. Manaka-bana abo by-malhita-ma bahy. “With ‘manaka’ leaves you
can make a house.”
1. manaka-bana: ‘palisadeblad’
2. kolhoa-bana: ‘dwergmaripa palmblad’
3. halhithi-bana: ‘palulublad’; dale-bana: ‘tasblad’
4. thimithi-bana: ‘truliblad’
BANA (n): liver. D-osy-n jokhan-ro, da-fara khanin khota-ha, thy-bana da-jaboda
d-onoa. “When I go hunting and shoot an animal, I roast its liver for
myself.” Possessed: da-bana = my liver.
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 125
BODALI (n): cassava baking plate. Da-kora-ka khali da-bodale diako. “I baked
cassava bread on my cassava baking plate.” Possessed: da-bodale = my
cassava baking plate.
BODE(-HE) (n): hook (for fishing). Hime bo-bode-sia-ka th-abo, to bode-he. “Fish
is what you catch with it, the hook.” Possessed: da-bode = my hook.
BODEDAN (vi): fish (with hook and line). Mothi w-osy-fa bodeda-nro. “Tomor-
row we will go fishing.”
BOJAN (vi): share food. Wakhili koba, na-man-fa n-onekoa, na-boja-ka n-onekoa
bania. “In the old days, when they (a couple) were in love with each
other, they shared food with each other briefly.”
BOJIN (vt): feed, give food. Bo-boja hibin-da je? “Did you feed them (e.g. the
guests) already?”
BOKAN (vi): cook (a meal).
BOKAN ... (Y)JA (vt): scare, startle. Boka-thi l-a to da-ja. “He startled me.”
BOKHITHI (n): older brother (of a male). Possessed: da-bokhithi = my older
brother.
BOKOAN (vi): boil, be cooked.
BOKOLHO(-HO) (n): cloth, clothing. D-osy farokha forto-nro, da-jonto-fa
da-bokolho-a. “If I go to town, I will buy my clothing.” Possessed:
da-bokolho-a = my clothing.
1. hiaro-non bokolho-ho: dress, skirt
2. bokolho-eke: suitcase
3. bokolho-iban: rag, cloth scrap, piece of cloth
BOKOLHO-IBAN (n): rag, cloth scrap, piece of cloth. Da-bokolho-iban da-kysa-ha
khali da-kyra-koana-wa. “My cloth scrap I will sew (as) my cassava bread
wrapper.” Possessed: da-bokolho-iban = my piece of cloth.
BOKON (vt): cook. Sa-re b-a-li boko-n to khota-ha, ija koa th-a-ma. “You must
cook the meat well, (otherwise) it may be still raw.”
BOKONOAN (vi): worry.
BOKOTAN (vt, vi): go around catching. Mothi d-osy-fa bokota-n-ba kodibio. “To-
morrow I will go around catching birds (bird hunting).”
BOKOTO-KOANA (n): handle. Ka-bokoto-koana saken-da no, ken kia khonaria
wa-nykynda-da no, w-osa th-abo. “It [a bomb] had something exactly like
handles, and we lifted it up using those, and we went with it (i.e. took
it along).”
BOKOTON (vt): grab, catch, hold, grip. To bariri bokota to kathikebero. “The po-
lice officer caught the thief.”
BOLHADAN (vi): ferment.
BOLHAHAN (vs): sour, spoiled, fermented. Bolha-ka to kadykyra. “The pepper
pot is spoiled.”
BOLHAN (vs): fermented, sour.
BOLHEDAN (vi): wrestle. Na-fata-ka kho balhin, ma bolheda-ro n-a. “They were
not really fighting, but they were only wrestling.”
BOLHEDIN (vt): lose. M-eithi-n d-a halon da-bolhedi-n da-jadoala-n-ia. “I do not
know where I lost my knife.”
BOLHEIDIN, BOLHIEDAN (vt): throw away, throw. Sa koa th-a to amathali;
amadoma bolheidi-ro n-a-da no? “The thing was still good; why did they
throw it away?” Ly-bolheida aba ada ly-madianthi manro. “He thew a
stick to his companion.”
128 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
BYNA (n): path, small road. Ma-wadili-ka d-osy-n khota byna lokhodi; thibokhili
koborokodi-ka dan. “I can’t go (follow) the animal trail; it goes through
(too dense a) thicket for me.”
BYNAN (vi): plant a planting ground. See: bonan.
BYNYN (vt): plant. See: bonyn.
BYRYKAN (vi): clean up (the picking up and burning of unburned wood after a
planting ground has been chopped open and burned). D-osy-fa
da-koban-ia byrykan-ro. “I will go clean up my planting ground.”
DAJA (n): trunk (of a tree).
DAKAMABALI (n): tree kind (‘brown heart’).
DAKAN (vi): urinate.
DALHIDAN (vi): run after, chase. Da-dalhida-ka to khota khona. “I chased the
animal.”
DALHIDI-KOANA(-HA), FALHETHO-DALHIDI-KOANA (n): car, bus, bicycle, mo-
torcycle. Aba dalhidi-koana loko b-osy-n kha, mera sabo-ka by-dalhidi-n.
“When you go in a car, you go (run) very quickly.” Possessed:
da-dalhidi-koana = my car.
DALHIDI-KOANA-KOTHI(-HI) (n): wheel, tire. Possessed: thy-dalhidi-koana-kothi
= its wheel, tire.
DALHIDIN (vi): run. Da-kanaby-n-the oni, da-dalhida d-andy-n-bia tho-boradi bahy-n.
“Hearing the rain coming, I ran arriving home before it (the rain).”
DALI (n): tree kind (‘baboon wood’).
DAN (pp): me-BEN (abbrev. of da-myn).
DANA(-HA) (n): leg. Ma-dana-n de, wadilia-n kho da-kona-n. “Without legs, it is
impossible for me to walk.” Possessed: da-dana = my leg.
DANAKE(-HE) (n): pants, trousers (leg container). Da-danake jarykydoa; da-retho
kysa-ha da-myn no. “My pants are torn; my wife will sew them for me.”
Possessed: da-danake = my pants.
DASE (p): exclamation of surprise. Adia th-a to firon dase! “It was very big!”
DE (pro): I, me, my. De osa-bo. “I am going.”
To to de myn. “It is for me.”
DEI (pro): he, him.
DENTHI (n): uncle. See: dinthi.
DIA: like, resemble. Khi dia koa th-a w-abo. “Thusly like manner (i.e. this is
how) it [the bus] did with us.” Ma-kaky khan-koa d-a, m-ani-n kha kho
wadili-sia-na-ma to dia d-a-n aka-n khonan to ama ... “Never in my life
have I been able to talk like this about what ...”
(Y)DIA(-HY) (n): word, message, story, language. By-dykha farokha da-sanothi,
b-aka khan-li to dia-hy na-myn: sa khan koa w-a-n khonan. “If you see my
children, you must tell them this message: it is still well with us.”
1. lokono dian: Arawak language
DIAKOARIA (pp): off of, from off the surface of. See: diakon, -aria.
DIAKON (pp): about (a subject). Kia diako l-onaba-ka dei. “He gave an answer to
that.”
DIAKON (pp): on, on the surface of top of. Bi-sika hala diakon no. “Set it on the
bench.”
DIAKONRO (pp): onto. See: diakon, -ro.
DIAN, YDIAN (vi): talk, speak. Kakanaky-re b-a-li ydia-n thojothi-non oma. “You
must speak loudly with old people.”
130 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
DONKON (vi): sleep. To olhika bali-koro, min-ka kho da-donko-n. “This past night
I slept a lot (or deeply).”
DORON (vt): weave (e.g. a basket or cassava squeezer). Dinthi, aba joro kho
bo-dora khanina-ma da-myn? “Uncle, couldn’t you just weave a cassava
squeezer for me?”
DYDYN, DYDAN (vi): jump, jump over, jump around. To da-dakhy-n baren to ori
da-sibon: min-ka kho da-dyda-n. “Concerning me suddenly seeing the
snake in front of me: I jumped greatly.” Alikan wadili-koma dyda-n
thima-n to onikhan? “Who is able to jump across the creek?”
DYKHAKOAN (adv): attentive manner. To w-osy-n jadoa-nro: dykhakoa n-a
wa-sanothi we-inabo. “Concerning our going on a trip: our children were
watching us (go).”
DYKHAN (vi): visit. To sondei (ST) bali-koro, d-osa koba da-jorodatho manro
dykha-n-ba. “This past Sunday I went to visit my sister.”
DYKHY-KOANA (n): mirror. Da-dykhy-koana loko da-dykha da-sibo-wa. “In my
mirror I see my own face.”
DYKHYN (vt): see. Khatho kari-n bo-kosi, wadili-koma kho sa-n by-dykhy-n. “When
your eyes hurt, you are not able to see well.”
DYKHYN...KHONA (vi): care for, take care of. San by-dykhy-n ibili khona-n, sa
na-bikhidonoa-n. “If you take care of children well, they will grow up
well.”
DYKHYSIAN (vt): spy. Aban koba osy-thi dia l-a tho-ja, ken l-oreda-n khan to
waboroko, ly-dykhysia-ha-da no. “Once he did as if he were leaving, and
rounding a small bend in the road, he spied on her.”
DYKHYTYN (vd): point out, demonstrate. By-dykhyta-na-ma kho da-myn, alo-nro
boren d-osy-n-fa? “Can’t you show me exactly where I have to go?”
DYLHYDAN (vs): flexible, stretchable, tough. To mibi: min-tho kho dylhyda-n to.
“The vine (e.g. one used to make baskets from): it is very flexible.”
DYLHYDAN (vi): massage. Min-ka kho kari-n da-loa-bana; da-dylhyda-kota-fa
da-khona-wa. “My chest hurts a lot; I will get myself massaged.”
DYLHYDYN (vt): drag, pull, pull on. Tatan doma to holholho, wadili-ka kho
da-waja da-dylhydy-n to khali-doli. “Because the ground is hard, I am not
able to pull (out) the cassava tubers by myself.”
DYNA(-HA) (n): arm (whole arm with hand). Dyna-ha abo by-nekhebo-koma.
“With arms you can work.” Possessed: da-dyna = my arm.
1. kodibio-dyna: wing
2. ada-dyna: branch
DYNEINA(-HA) (n): shoulder. Da-dyneina abo da-nyka-ma ada. “With my shoul-
der I can carry wood.” Possessed: da-dyneina = my shoulder.
EIBAN (vt): set a gun trap. See: iban.
EIBIN (vt): leave behind. See: ibin.
EIBOAN (vi): leave behind.
EIBOAN, EIBONOAN (vi): finished.
EIBON (vt): finish.
EIMATAN, EMATAN (vt): anger, make angry, madden.
EIMATONOAN, EMATONOAN (vi): angry. To ma-kanaba-n-thi l-a-n li siokothi
da-khonan: d-eimatoa lo-myn. “Concerning that the boy doesn’t want to
listen to (obey) me: I am angry with him.”
EINATAN (vi): begin, make a beginning at. See: inatan.
132 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
FATAN (vi): fight. Na-fata-ka kho balhin, ma boredaro n-a. “They were not really
fighting, they were only wrestling.”
FILOAN (vt): take off, remove. Ly-dykhy-nbia-da no: thy-filoa-n tho-bokolho, ken
thy-welada bodali kosa-da no ... “He saw it: she took off her clothes, and
she hung them next to the cassava baking plate ...”
FIRO(-HO) (n): body. To firo-ho khonaria-tho to si-hi matho kothi-hi, dyna-ha
matho khabo-ho, ken abyryky koan. “On the body are head and feet, legs
and hands, and still other things.”
FIRO(-HO) (n): penis.
FIROBERO (n): tapir.
FIRON (vs): big, thick. Min-tho kho firon to. “It is very big.” Aba firo-tho bahy
da-malhithi-fa. “I am going to build a big house.”
FIROTAN...IRI (vt): praise, enlarge. Hi-firota Adajali iri. “(you-PL) Praise God.”
FIROTYN, FIROTAN (vt): enlarge, make bigger. Da-sikoa basaban-ka da-firota
sabo-fa no. “My house is small, I will enlarge it.”
FODI (n): capuchin monkey; monkey (generic). Aba fodi bolhedokota-ka-the ada
iwi d-adi. “A monkey threw fruit on me.” Possessed: da-fodi-a = my
monkey.
FODYN (vt): blow (with mouth, or wind). Da-foda aba bejokha. “I blow a flute.”
Min-ka kho to awadoli fody-n. “The wind blew very hard.”
FOFODAN (vi): whistle with the hands.
FOFON (vs): soft (e.g. sand). Min-ka kho fofo-n to mothoko. “The sand is very
soft.”
FOLIFOLIN (vs): slippery (e.g. a fish).
FONASIAN (vs): hungry. Fonasia-ka de. “I am hungry.”
FOROTON (vt): press. Falhetho-kyndykha by-kalemeta-thi farokha, aba tho-kojo
thiantho diako bo-foroto-fa. “If you want to light a flashlight, you must
press on its navel-like thing (switch).”
FORTO (n): city (ENG:fort). See: thojosikoa.
FOTHIKHIDIN, FOTHIKHIDAN (vi): exit, come out.
HABORI(N) (vs, n): ashamed, shy. Khatho kobydoa-hy abarykyno adi, min-ka kho
habori-n loko-ho. “When one makes mistakes in front of others, one is in
great shame.”
HADALI, ADALI (n): sun. See: adali.
HADOLHI (n): capybara (species) (small).
HAKO (n): mortar (for pounding cassava flour). D-eta jora-ha d-ako-n loko
hako-rethi abo. “I pound cassava meal in my mortar with its husband
(pestle).” Possessed: d-ako-n = my mortar.
HAKO-RETHI (n): pestle (mortar husband — for making cassava flour). D-eta
jora-ha d-ako-n loko hako-rethi abo. “I pound cassava meal in my mortar
with its husband (pestle).”
HALA (n): bench, stool. Hala: kia to balyty-koana-ha. “A bench: that is a thing
for sitting.” Possessed: da-la-n = my bench.
HALEKHEBEN, ALEKHEBEN (vs): happy, glad. See: alekheben.
HALHALHO (n): gourd spoon.
HALHAN (n): all, everyone. Halhan hy-makoa h-anda-li-the d-amyn. “All of you
must come by me (i.e. to my house).”
134 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
HALHAN (vs): gone, consumed, finished (e.g. completely consumed or used up).
To atha w-amon-i-n-sia: halha no. “The drink (e.g. a barrel of cassava
beer) we had: it is finished.”
HALHIRAN (vs): white. Adia th-a tora bokolho halhira-n-da. “Those clothes are
very white.”
HALHO (n): cassava starch, glue made from cassava starch. Firo-tho halho
d-amon-i-n kha, da-jokara-ma khi ba no. “When I have a lot of cassava
starch, I can sell it again (i.e. to replace the money spent buying what
is needed to get the starch.)” Possessed: d-alho-n = my cassava starch.
HALIKA, ALIKA (qw, rp): how. See: alika.
HALIKAN, ALIKAN (qw, rp): who. See: alikan.
HALIKHA, ALIKHA (qw, rp): when. See: alikha.
HALIMA (qw, rp): how long, as long as, however long. Da-lada-ka halima d-a-n
ma-khole-n khona koan. “I chopped as long as I (could) without being
tired (i.e. until I got tired).”
HALITHI (n): sweet potato (white, yellow, or orange kind).
HAMAKA (n): hammock. Jafo abo da-malhita hamaka. “With cotton I make
hammocks.”
HANANAN (vs): thick (e.g. thick skin) Tora khota-ha thojo-tho-ja-da no, kiadoma
hanana th-yda. “That animal was an old one, therefore its hide was
thick.”
HAO (n): monkey (species).
HAROKHA, FAROKHA (p): if, when (conditional). See: farokha.
HATHI, ATHI (n): pepper (a very hot kind). Hathi m-amyn th-a-n, seme m-a kho
to kadykyra. “If it doesn’t have pepper, the pepper pot (soup) is not
tasty.” Possessed: d-athi-a = my pepper.
HEBEN (vs): full. Hebe-ka to by-kanan? “Is your boat full?”
HEBEN (vs): ripe. Hebe-ka to by-manikhinia-n? “Are your eating bananas ripe?”
HEHE (p): yes (emphatic).
HEHEN (vs): yellow, pale. To hehe-bero kathokolhokhili bi-sika da-myn. “Give the
yellow flowers to me.”
HELODON (vt): polish, shine. Herebe-ka da-kothi-eke; da-helodo-fa no. “My shoes
are dirty; I will polish them.”
HELOTHO (n): gold, shiny stuff. Possessed: da-helotho-n = my gold. See:
kalemero.
HEMELIAN, EMELIAN (vs): new. Aba hemelia-tho da-simalha-wa da-jonta. “I
bought a new gun for myself.”
HI (pro): you (plural), your (plural). Hi dalhida-bo. “You (PL) are running.”
1. Hi sikoa to: It is your (PL) house.
2. To to hi myn: It is for you (PL).
HIARO (n): female, woman. Hiaro min-tho kho ka-nikho-thi-n. “Women greatly
want things to decorate one’s body with (e.g. jewelry).”
HIBIN (p): almost. De koborokoa-ka koan alika th-a-n aba kabadaro hibin bokoto-n
li d-oribithi. “I still remember how a jaguar almost grabbed my
brother-in-law.”
HIBIN (p): already. Kabyn kasakabo-ka kari-n hibin de. “I have been sick three
days already.” L-anda hibin? “Has he arrived already?”
HIKOLHI (n): turtle.
HIME (n): fire. Possessed: de hime = my fire.
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 135
HIME (n): fish. Hime da-bodesia-koma oniabo rakoaria. “I can (catch) fish in
water.”
HIMEDAN (vi): fish. To mothia w-osy-fa himedan-ro. “In the morning we will go
to fish.”
HIMIRI (n): fish (species) (ST: noja).
HITHI (n): bird (species) (ST: powisi).
HITOLHI (n): monkey (species) (red howler).
HIWA, IWA (n): year.
HOBO (n): tree (species) (ST: mope).
HODODI (n): woodpecker. To hododi olada-ka ada khondi. “The woodpecker
drills holes in trees.”
HOKOLHERO (n): capybara (species) (D: konijn).
HOLE (n): hole. See: ole.
HOLHISIRI (n): fish (species) (ST: pataka).
HOLHOE (n): monkey (species) (ST: wanakoe).
HOLHOLHO (n): ground, earth, world. De jada holholho diakhodi. “I travel
around on the earth.”
HOLHOLHO (n): hill, mountain. Abaro kho ajomyn-tho holholho ja-ka
moda-sia-ma diakon. “There are many mountains here which can be
climbed on.”
HOLHOLHO (n): property. Da-jonto farokha aba holholho, da-malhithi-fa aba bahy
thy-diako. “If I buy a property, I am going to build (make) a house on
it.” Possessed: da-olholha = my property.
HON (pp): you(PL)-BEN (abbrev. of hy-myn).
HONOLI (n): bird (species) (D: tijgervogel).
HYRYKYN (vs): even, the same. Hyryky-re h-a nebethi-n to amathali. “You (PL)
have to divide the thing (e.g. an animal) evenly (among you).”
HYRYREN (adv): fully.
HYRYRY (n): file.
HYRYRYDIASALHERO (n): bird (species) (ST: anamoe).
IBAN (n): remainder, leftover. To Jezus boji-n koba na abali-non kho, th-iban koan
biandakhabo-diako-bian keke n-ebeketa th-abo. “When Jesus fed the many,
they filled twelve baskets with the remainder of the meal.”
IBAN (vt): trap (e.g. by setting up a gun with trip wire). Tabo aba wakhai-tho
kho khota bona-ha da-dykha; d-eiba-fa da-simalha-wa tho-boran. “Over
there I saw a good animal trail. I will set up a gun trap for it (an ani-
mal)” See: eiban.
IBIHI (n): medicine. Li kari-thi isadoa, sa-tho ibihi l-othikhi-n doma. “The sick man
was healed, because he received good medicine.”
IBILI (n): child. M-amy-n d-a-n kha ibili, ama kho aikhata-koma da-koboroko. “If I
didn’t have children, nothing would console me.”
IBILIN (vs): small.
IBIN (vt): leave behind. Jara hala diako b-iba to buku (ST) da-myn. “Leave the
book for me on that bench.” See: eibin.
IBIN (vs): small. Khi d-a-n dykhy-n rikene aba maja firo-tho bala, aba maja ibi-ron
my-thi simalha lokoto-n-da de. “At the moment I saw it, I had the gun
loaded on one side with big shot, on the other side with small.”
IBONOAN (vi): finished. See: eibonoan.
IDA (n): gourd bowl.
136 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
IHI (n): arrow cane. By-malhita-ma sarapa ihi abo. “You can make arrows with
arrow cane.” Possessed: deja-the = my arrow cane (irregular).
IJA (vs): raw. Sare b-a-li boko-n to khota-ha; ija koa th-a-ma. “You must cook the
meat well; (otherwise) it might still be raw.”
IKADYREN (vi): able to hear.
IKAN (vi): marry. Tokota kathi na bianinon bikhidoliathi ika-fa-the. “Next month
the two young men are going to get married.”
IKASIAN (vt): forget. Alikan khana ikasia-ka lo-kothike-wa jaha? “Who then forgot
his own shoes here?”
IKHI (n): fire. Bo-bokota-ma ikhi diako. “You can cook on fire.” Possessed: de
hime = my fire (irregular).
IKHI-KHODO (n): firewood. Waboka da-borata da-retho-wa nykyn ikhi-khodo.
“Just now I helped my wife carry firewood.”
IKOLHIDAN (vi): wound (go around wounding). Li jokha-thi ikolhida ro-ma to
khota-be khona. “The hunter can only go around wounding animals (i.e.
he is a bad hunter.”)
IKOLHIDIN (vt): wound. Majokha-n b-a to da-kalhinan khona; b-ikolhidi farokha
no, bo-jonto-fa no. “Don’t go around throwing things at my chickens; if
you wound one, you will buy it.”
ILON (vs): large, big.
ILONTHI (n): boy (near puberty).
ILONTHO (n): girl (near puberty). Tora ilontho to de ysa. “That big girl is my
child.”
INABO (pp): after (temporal). D-osa-bo tano-ho bo-bora, ken mothi b-osa-li-the
de-inabo. “I am leaving today before you, and tomorrow you must come
after me (i.e. I’ll go first, then you come later).”
INABO (pp): behind, after (locative). L-ysananothi dalhida-bo l-inabo. “His chil-
dren are running after him.”
INARIA (pp): starting from.
INATAN (vi): begin, make a beginning at. Mothi d-einata-ha da-kekere-wa. “To-
morrow I will start (making) my own basket.” See: einatan.
INATYN (vt): begin. Mothi d-einaty-fa da-nekhebo khona. “Tomorrow I will begin
on my work.” See: einthyn.
INIABO (n): water. See: oniabo.
IREBEN, EREBEN (vs): dirty, messy. See: ereben.
IRI(-HI) (n): name. Possessed: l-iri = his name.
IRITHIN (vt): name. Ylhihi-n doma da-balha, ylhisili n-a irithi-n-da de. “Because
my hair is dark, they called me dark-head.”
ISADAN (vt): improve, prepare, heal. Firo-tho kasakabo boran, sare w-o-fa isada-n
wa-sikoa khiradia. “Before the feast day, we will prepare the area around
our house well.” Li bikathi isada li kari-thi. “The doctor healed the sick
man.”
ISADONOAN, ISADOAN (vi): be healed. Min-thi koba kho kari-n li da-sa, ma
wakharo siokhan l-a-thi-ka isadonoa-n. “My child was very sick, but now
he is getting a little better.” Li kari-thi isadoa, sa-tho ibihi l-othikhi-n
doma. “The sick man was healed because he received good medicine.”
ISADONOAN, ISADOAN (vi): be prepared. D-osy-n bora khojaboa-sikoa-nro, sare
d-oa isadonoa-n. “Before I go to church, I prepare myself well.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 137
ISADYN (vt): save. B-othikhi farokha by-polata-nia, sare b-a-li isady-n no. “If you
get your money, you must save it well.”
ISI(-HI) (n): head. Da-si da-noro diako-ka. “My head is on my neck.” Possessed:
da-si = my head.
ISI(-HI) (n): leader, boss, captain. Wa-si dykhy-thi wa-sikoa khona. “Our captain
is the one who watches over our village.”
ITAN (vi): pound (e.g. cassava flour with mortar and pestle). See: etan.
ITHAN, ITHIN (vt): know. See: eithan, eithin, ethan, ethin.
ITHI (n): father (also father’s brother). Possessed: da-thi = my father.
ITOKO(-HO) (b): tail.
IWA (n): star. See: wiwa.
IWA (n): year. See: hiwa.
IWI (n): fruit, seed.
(Y)JA (n): spirit, image, photo. See: yja.
JA(HA), JA(DI)(-HI), JA(RA) (n, vs): here.
JABOARIA (pp): in front of, to the front of, forward. See: jabon, -aria.
JABOATHO (n): aunt (mother’s sister). Possessed: da-jaboatho = my aunt.
JABODYN (vt): roast. Min-ka kho fonasia-n de; da-jabody-fa aba hime d-onoa. “I
am very hungry; I will roast a fish for myself.”
JABON (pp): behind, after. Aba siokothi da-sikoa jabon-ka. “A little boy is behind
my house.”
JABONRO (pp): to the back of, to the rear of, behind, after. See: jabon, -ro.
JABOSAN, JOBYSAN (vi): sieve cassava flour, sift cassava flour.
JABYDYN, JABYDAN (vt): roast.
JADAN (vt): pull out, threaten. Da-jada-fa da-khale-wa. “I will pull out (of the
ground) my cassava tubers.” Li malokonisiathi jada-ka kasipara abo
ly-madianthi-wa. “The bad man threatened his own friend with a
machete.”
JADOALA (n): knife. Da-jadoala-n da-bolheda; m-eithi-n d-a alon nin no. “I lost my
knife; I don’t know where it is.” Possessed: da-jadoala-n = my knife.
JADOAN (vi): go on an outing, take a walk, take a stroll, travel, take a trip.
Abahan d-osy-fa da-sanothi abo jadoa-n-ba dierentuin (D) ninro. “Someday
I will go with my children on an outing to the zoo.”
JADYN (vi): travel, journey. Lira to falhetho adiakhanken-thi jady-n, kiadoma
abaro kho sikoa-hy ly-dykha. “That Caucasian travels a lot, therefore a lot
of countries he has seen.”
JAFO (n): cotton. Jafo abo da-malhita hamaka. “With cotton I make hammocks.”
Possessed: da-jafo-n = my cotton.
JAKASYN, JAKASAN (vt): kick. Ma-jakasa-n b-a to by-pero-nia; tho-jokha-koma
kho sabo. “Don’t kick your dog; (or) it won’t be able to hunt anymore.”
JAKHATYN, JAKHATAN (vt): hide, conceal. Lira ememethi-khabo jakhata to
jadoala-n d-oria. “That sticky hand (someone who constantly takes
things) concealed the knife from me.”
1. jakhatoan: conceal one’s self, hide one’s self
JAKOSOAN (vi): stall.
JAKOSON (vt): extinguish.
JALHIDIN (vi): fish by poisoning, poison fish. To hime-be min-ka kho odo-n;
na-jalhida-ka th-adi. “Many fish died; they poisoned them.”
138 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
JALOKHOTAN (vi, vt): trade, barter. Wakhili, m-eithi-n koa n-a-n kha polata,
jalokhota-ro n-a ama rikene-n n-amon-i-n-sia falhetho-be oma. “Long ago,
when they still didn’t know (about) money, they traded/bartered all
sorts of things they had with the Caucasians.”
JALOKHOTON, JALOKHOTYN (vt): return (something borrowed). Da-bokhithi
amyn da-tyna-ba khaborokhodo-ho, ma da-jalokhoto-fa khi-da ba no. “At
(from) my older brother I borrowed money, but I will return it again.”
JALOKOTON (vi): undress.
JARAO (n): fish (species) (ST: warapa).
JATYN (vt): draw, sketch. Lira wadili min-thi kho eithi-n jaty-n amathali. “That
man knows (how) to draw things very well.”
JAWAHY (n): devil.
JAWALHE (n): opossum (species).
JE (pro): they [+human], them [+human].
JEMA(-HA) (n): nausea. Jema-thi d-a. “I feel nauseous.”
JENI(-HI) (n): song, tune. Da-wiwida aba jeni khan. “I whistled a little song.”
JENTONOAN (vi): sing. Joli-non jentonoa-n: sa-thi th-a kanaba-bia. “Many people
singing: it (is) nice/good/pretty to hear.”
JERIKOAN (vi): cut hair.
JESERE (n): armadillo (species).
JESI (n): armadillo (species) (ST: kapasi).
JOARIA, JOAJA (tw): then, next, from then, from there. Joaria w-osa khi-ka-da
ba hadali kolokon. “From there, we went on the same way in the sun.”
JODOKOTON (vt): hang, hang up. Da-jodokota bahy-dora khona d-arakabosa-n. “I
hang my gun on the wall.”
JODON (vt): swing, rock. Bo-joda basada-ren li siokothi abo, m-anaby-n l-a-n-bia.
“Swing/rock (i.e. in a hammock) the little boy gently, so that he doesn’t
waken.”
JOHON (vs): many. De sikoa-n min-ka kho joho-n kolhi-hi. “My house has many
rats.”
JOJON (vs): wet, moist. To bokolho jojo-ka. “The clothes are wet.”
JOJOTON (vt): wet, moisten.
JOKARYN, JOKARAN (vt): sell. B-amyn-ka nana jokara-bia? “Do you have pine-
apple to sell?”
JOKHAN (vi): hunt; go around throwing things. Mothi, saoka koa th-arokha,
d-osy-fa jokha-n-ro. “Tomorrow, if it is still good weather, I will go hunt-
ing.” Ma-jokha-n b-a to ka-kalhina-n khona; b-ikolhidi farokha no,
bo-jonto-fa de. “Don’t go around throwing (things) at my chicken(s); if
you wound it/them, you will pay me.”
JOKHON (vi): shoot. To d-osy-n jokha-n-ro: da-kanaba aba da-kosa khan jokho-n.
“Concerning my going to hunt: I hear someone sort of close to me
shoot.”
JOKHONOAN (vi): shoot. To da-simalha min-tho kho ka-kanakyn jokhonoa-n to.
“My gun shoots very loudly.”
JOKORO (n): peccary (species) (ST: pingo).
JOLHADOA-KOANA(-HA) (n): boat, canoe. Possessed: da-jolhadoa-koana.
JOLHADYN (vi): float. Aba ada, ‘thikhobolo’ n-asia myn, min-tho kho jolhady-n.
“One (kind of) wood, which they call ‘thikhobolo’, floats very well.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 139
JOLHATYN ... ANSI (vt): tease, bother, torture. Ma-jolhaty-n b-a to pero ansi;
thy-rydaja-fa-da bo. “Don’t tease the dog; it will bite you.”
JOLHI (n): tobacco, cigarette, cigar. B-amyn-ka aba jolhi da-myn? Min-ka kho
da-kolhedoa-thi-n. “Do you have a cigarette for me? I have a great desire
to smoke.”
JOLHODOAN (vi): hang. To bajolha-be khonaria tho-jolhodoa, da-kora. “From the
beams it hangs, my hammock.”
JON (n, vs): there.
JONA (n): wage, worth, price. Possessed: tho-jona = its price.
(O)JONO (n): family. See: ojono.
JONTAN (vt): buy. Ka-polata-nin kha de, min-koma kho da-jonta-n th-abo. “If I
were rich (lit: moneyed), I could buy a lot with it.”
JONTHO (rp): there where, where. Jontho thy-boadonoa-n w-abo kawa-ka oniabo.
“There where it broke down on us, there is no water.” Khi dia w-a-n
bena-da, wa-bali-ka jontho-bo w-osy-n ninro. “After doing thusly, we went
on to where we were going.”
JONTON (vt): pay. Sa farokha by-nekhebo-n da-myn, sa-fa da-jonto-n thy-jonabo.
“If you work for me well, I will pay a good wage.”
JONTONOAN, JONTOAN (vi): pay back, repay. By-sikhi farokha firo-tho kasiri
da-myn, da-jonto-fa balhinia khi ba. “If you give me a big (gourd of) cas-
sava beer (to drink), I will pay you back again the same way.”
JORAHA (n): grated and squeezed cassava pulp, cassava flour, cassava meal.
Da-jobysa joraha da-manalhi-a abo. “I sift cassava flour with my sifting
basket.”
JORO (n): cassava squeezer (made of basketry). Da-joroda khali da-joro-n abo. “I
squeeze (i.e. squeeze the poisonious juice out of) cassava with my cas-
sava squeezer.” Possessed: da-joro-n = my cassava squeezer.
JORO-RETHI (n): stick upon which one sits to stretch the cassava squeezer to
cause it to squeeze.
JORODATHO (n): sister (of a male). Possessed: da-jorodatho = my sister.
JORODON (vi): squeeze cassava.
JOROKON (vi): drag. Tho-moty-n da-nakara de, kia loko joroko-ro d-a th-abo. “My
burden defeated me (i.e. it was too heavy); because of that I dragged
it.”
KABADARO (n): jaguar. Kabadaro khi ron to khota-ha konoko lokhodi. “Jaguars
only eat animals in the forest.”
KABENA (tw): later.
KABILOKON (vs): wide. De bona-ha min-tho kho kabiloko-n. “My path (e.g. the
path to my house) is very wide.”
KABOJA, KABYJA (n): planting ground. D-osy-fa kaboja-nro; da-reke-fa. “I will
go to my planting ground; I will weed.” Possessed: da-kabo-n = my
planting ground.
KABOKHALI (n): tree (species) (ST: copie).
KABYN (quant, num): three.
KABYNIBO: three times.
KABYNTHIAN (quant, num): eight.
KADANARO (n): deer.
KADYKYRA, KADAKYRA (n): pepper pot (a soup made of boiled cassava juice
with pepper and meat or fish). Da-kadykyra loko da-boka-ma khota-ha
140 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
matho hime. “In my pepper pot (soup) I can cook meat and fish.” Pos-
sessed: da-kadykyra = my pepper pot.
KADYNABORO (n): tree (species) (ST: kankantrie).
KAJADAN (vi): notice, be aware of. Jakhatoa loko d-osa-ja balhin, ma na-kajada
da-khonan. “I went secretly, but they noticed me anyway.”
KAJADYN (vt): notice. Miaka olhika d-osa jadan-ro, ken da-retho ma-kajady-n-ka
da-khonan alikha diaro ren d-osy-n. “Yesterday night I went hunting, and
my wife didn’t notice exactly when I went.” See: kajadan.
KAJADYN ... KHONA (vt): understand. To ama by-dia-sia da-myn: da-kajada
khan-ka tho-khona. “Concerning what you said to me: I do understand
it.”
KAJOKOTHI (n): alligator.
KAJOLHERO (n): cow. Da-kajolhero-n ka-sa farokha, d-othika-ma tho-dio-(y)ra
da-than-ia-wa. “If my cow had a calf, I could get its milk as my bever-
age.” Possessed: da-kajolhero-n = my cow.
KAKANAKYN (vs): loud. Ka-kanaky-re b-a-li ydia-n thojothi-non oma. “You have
to speak loudly with old people.”
KAKOARO (n): cow. Da-kakoaro-n ka-sa farokha, d-othika-ma tho-dio-(y)ra
da-than-ia-wa. “If my cow had a calf, I could get its milk as my bever-
age.” Possessed: da-kakoaro-n = my cow.
1. kakoaro ysa: calf
KAKOLHEMERO (n): capybara (species) (D: konijn).
KAKOLHOTHIMA (n): boil, bump (on the skin). Be-bebeda-the da-dana khona,
ama thiaron baha kakolhothima. “Come feel on my leg what sort of bump
it could be.”
KAKOLOKHODORO (n): fish (species) (ST: anjoemara).
KAKOSALOKORO (n): monkey (species).
KAKOSIRO (n): deer.
KAKY(-HY) (n): life. To kaky-hy w-amon-i-n-sia: li malhithi-thi we siki-sia-ra
wa-myn-da-n. “The life which we have: it is what the one who made us
(God) gave to us.”
KAKYN (vi): live. San kaky-n wabokoa we: saboro th-a wa-myn. “Our living well
with each other: it is good for us.”
KAKYTHI (n): man, human.
KAKYTHO (n): woman, human [non-Arawak].
KALEME(-HE) (n): light. To kaleme-he kari-thi-thi-ma da-kosi, adiake th-a tata-n.
“The light which wants to hurt my eyes, it is very strong.”
KALEMERO (n): gold, bright thing. Kalemero kawa-n kha, alika w-a-ma khan
ka-nikho-n? “If there were no gold, how could we have jewelry?” Pos-
sessed: da-kalemero = my gold. See: helotho.
KALEMETHIN (vt): light.
KALHAO (vs): green.
KALHAO, KALHO (n): grain. Aba mothoko kalho osa da-kosi loko-nro. “A sand
grain went into my eye.”
KALHAO, KALHO (n): grass. Koadoa-kothiro: kia min-ka kho khi-n to kalhao.
“Cows/horses: they eat lots of grass.” Possessed: da-kalhao-ja = my
grass.
1. kalhao-iwi: rice (lit: grass seed)
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 141
KALHINA (n): chicken. Da-kalhina-n joto farokha, da-jokara-ma khi ba no. “If my
chickens multiply, I could sell them again (i.e. just as I bought them).”
Possessed: da-kalhina-n = my chicken.
1. kalhina-sa: chicken egg
KALHIWALHO (n): fish (species) (ST: kwikwi).
KALHO (n): grass. See: kalhao.
KALHOBA (n): bird (species) (ST: wakago, D: boshaan).
KALHYDAKOTON (vt): fold. Bi-misidi farokha da-danake, sare b-a-li kalhydakoto-n
no. “If you iron my pants, you must fold them well.”
KALHYDAN (vi): break a bone. Hetho-re h-a bira-n; hy-kalhyda-koma. “(you-PL)
Be careful in your playing; you could break a bone (e.g. arm or leg).”
KALHYDONOAN, KALHYDOAN (vi): be broken. See: kalhydyn.
KALHYDYN (vt): break, snap (by bending). Bo-bora farokha to ada-sa, by-kalhyda
bo-boroadia no. “If there is a branch in front of you, break it off before
you.” Hebe-ka to nana; da-kalhydy-fa no. “The pineapples are ripe; I am
going to harvest them (lit: break them off).”
1. kalhydykytyn: cause to break
KALYN, KAYLYN (vs): fast, quick.
KAMA (n): tapir.
KAMANAN (vs): sharp. Etho-re b-a to jadoala myn; min-ka kho ka-mana-n no. “Be
careful of the knife; it is very sharp.” Min-ka kho da-kasipara-n kamana-n.
“My machete is very sharp.”
KAMONEKA (vs): poor, be in difficulty. Alikan m-amyn-thi bojoa-hy, ne to
kamoneka-thi. “Those who don’t have food, they are (really) poor.”
KAMOTHINAN (vs): difficult, poor. To malhikhota ibili-non: min-tho kho
kamothina-n to. “The teaching of children: it is very difficult.”
(Y)KAN (vi): bathe. Bakylamabo da-ka-fa-ba. “This afternoon I will go take a
bath.”
KANABAN (vt): hear. Bi waboken kanaba to khota simaka-n? “Do you hear the
animal also (i.e. in addition to me)?”
KANABYN (vt): listen. Sare h-a-li kanaby-n ama d-a-n-fa dia-n ho-myn. “You (PL)
must listen well (to) what I am going to say to you.”
KANABYN...KHONAN (vi): obey. Hy-kanaby-ra-fa to thojothi-non khonan. “You
(PL) should obey grown-ups.”
KANAKANASIRO (n): chicken. See: kalhina.
KANAKYDI (n): stem of the cassava plant.
KANAKYN (n): sound.
1. ka-kanaky-n: loud
2. ma-kanaky-n: soft (not loud)
KANAN (n): boat, large canoe. Possessed: da-kanan = my boat.
KANOA (n): canoe. Possessed: da-kanoa-n = my canoe.
KANSIN (vt): love, like. Lira bikhidoliathi: kansi-thi hibin li. “That young man
there: he is already in love.” See: ansin.
KARI(-HI) (n): sickness, pain.
KARIN (vs): sick. Kabyn kasakabo-ka kari-n hibin de. “I have already been sick
for three days.”
KARIRO (n): dog. See: pero.
KARIRO (n): fish (species) (ST: anjoemara).
142 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
KAROBO (n): plate (to eat from). Karobo kawa-n kha, alika d-a-ma khan khota-n?
“If there are no plates, how can I eat?” Possessed: da-karobo-n = my
plate.
KASAKABO (tw): daytime. Da-nekhebo-ka kasakabo. “I work in the daytime.”
KASAKABO NEBETAN (tw): noon. Kasakabo nebetan da-khoto-fa. “At noon I will
eat.”
KASAKABO(-HO) (n): day. Kasakoda nebetan dikhi thy-nyka aba emelia-tho
kasakabo. “After midnight a new day begins.”
KASAKODA (tw): nighttime (21:00–24:00). Kasakoda d-osy-fa-the jokhan-ro. “To-
night I will go hunting.”
KASAKODA NAKAN (tw): midnight. Kasakoda nakan dikhi thy-nyka aba
emelia-tho kadakabo. “After midnight a new day begins.”
KASAKODA NEBETAN (tw): midnight. Kasakoda nebetan da-donko-ra-fa. “At
midnight I will probably be sleeping.”
KASAKONRO (tw): pre-dawn (3:00–6:00). See: mothiaro.
KASALHERO (n): bird (species) (ST: anamoe).
KASI (n): fish (species) (ST: djakie).
KASIAN (vt): forget. De kasia-n boradi, bo-koborokoata-li-da de. “Before I forget,
you must remind me.”
KASIPARA (n): machete. Kasipara abo da-soka-ka ada-sa-be. “With the machete I
cut young trees.” Possessed: da-kasipara-n = my machete.
KASIRI (n): cassava beer (fermented cassava drink).
KATELOKOJAN, -TELOKOJAN (vs, vt): hate. Ama khoraria na-telokoja-ka
n-onekoa? “Why do they hate each other?”
KATHI (n): month. Tokota kathi na bianinon bikhidoliathi ika-fa-the. “Next month
the two young men will get married.”
KATHI (n): moon. Wadia khoro kathi kolhobody-fa. “Pretty soon it will be full
moon.”
KATHIKEBETHI, KATHIKEBERO, KATHIKEBETHO (n): thief. To bariri bokota to
kathikebero. “The policeman grabbed the thief.”
KATHOKOLHOKHILI (n): flower. Da-kathokolhokhili-a da-siki-fa da-sikoa lokoa
sa-ko th-a-nbia da-sikoa. “My flowers I will put in my house to beautify
it, my house.” Possessed: da-kathokolhokhili-a = my flower.
KATHYNAN (vi): bleed. Bo-soko farokha kasipara abo, min-ka kho ka-thyna-n no.
“If you get cut with a machete, it (the wound) will bleed a lot.”
KATORORO (n): tapir.
KAWALAINARO (n): capybara (species) (D: haas, ST: hei, h’e).
KAWAN (vs): absent, be gone.
KAYLYN (vs): fast, quick. Adia l-a kaylyn osy-n-da. “He goes (e.g. walks) very
quickly.”
KE, EKE (n): container.
KEKE, KEKERE (n): basket (used primarily by women to carry things).
Ma-kekere-n kha de, wadili-koma kho khali-doli da-nyky-n. “If I didn’t have
a basket, it would be impossible for me to carry cassava tubers.” Pos-
sessed: da-kekere = my basket.
KELI (n): cassava juice (very poisonous — contains HCN, cyanide).
KEN (conj): and.
KEROSYN (vt): turn. Adiake-man b-a kerosonoan, thy-jodako-ma bo-kosi. “If you
turn around a lot, your head can become dizzy.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 143
KHONA (pp): on, at. Tho-loa sibo khona d-osa. “I went (i.e. shot) at its chest.”
KHONAN (pp): about. Da-khonan tha na-dia-ka. “They are talking about me.”
See: dykha...khonan, anda...khona.
KHONAN (vi): dress. Bokolho-ho da-khona. “I dressed.”
KHONARIA (pp): from, on, with. Da-thoboda da-kora da-bajolhan khonaria. “I
hang my hammock from my beam.”
KHONARO, KHONANRO (pp): toward, at, on. See: khona, -ro.
KHONDI (n): body, main structure.
KHORODAN (vi): clear undergrowth before cutting trees to open a new plant-
ing ground. D-osy-fa khoroda-nro. “I will go to clear undergrowth.” See:
khorodon.
KHORODON (vt): clear undergrowth before cutting trees to open a new plant-
ing ground. Waboka d-osa bi khorodo-n-ba da-koban-ia-wa. “Just a little
while ago I went to go cut undergrowth on my own planting ground.”
KHOTA(-HA) (n): animal. Da-dalhida-ka to khota khona. “I chased the animal.”
To khota-ha, ‘jesi’ na-siamyn, min-tho kho thiki-n. “The animal people call
‘jesi’ (armadillo) digs a lot.”
KHOTA(-HA) (n): food, meat. Da-kadykyra loko da-boka-ma khota-ha matho hime.
“In my pepper pot (soup) I can cook meat and fish.”
KHOTON (n): a meal. Possessed: da-khoton-ia = my meal.
KHOTON, KHOTAN (vt, vi): eat a meal. B-ojo siki farokha bo-khoton-ia, jema
loko-thi m-a-n b-a khoto-n. “If your mother gives you your meal, you
must not eat as if you were nauseated (i.e. you must eat heartily).”
KHYTHEHE (n): plants (useful, domesticated). Thi-bitoa da-koban, da-bona
khan-fa da-khythehe. “(When) my planting ground has been burned (i.e.
the trees, etc., burned in preparation for planting), I will plant my
plants.”
KIA (n): that, that one, that situation.
KIADOMA (p): therefore, so, because of that. Sa-ja kho by-khabaty-n to khota
siroko, kiadoma thy-boadoa-ja. “You didn’t salt the meat well, therefore it
spoiled.”
KISIN (vt): try. Taha Java-nro wa-kisi-ka osa-bia. “We tried to go all the way to
the village of Java.”
KIWIHIN (vi): to have fruit, be successful in the hunt.
KOA (n): crab.
KOA(N), -KOA: manner. Khi dia koa th-a w-abo. “Thusly like manner (i.e. this is
how) it [the bus] did with us.” We osa-bo l-inabo basada-koan. “We went
behind him slowly.”
KOADOA-KOTHIRO (n): horse, mule, cow, hooved animal. Wakhili koba
koadoa-kothiro ron diako na-jada koba. “Long ago they travelled only on
horses.” Possessed: da-koadoa-kothiron = my horse.
KOAN (p): still.
KOANA (n): thing (instrument), tool.
KOBA (tw): distant past.
KOBAN (n): planting ground. Da-koban loko da-byna halhanron amathali. “In my
planting ground I plant all sorts of things.” Possessed: da-koban(-ia) =
my planting ground.
KOBOASI (n): monkey (species) (ST: monkie-monkie).
KOBODOA(-HY) (n): mistake, fault.
146 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
KOLHELI (n): smoke, steam, dust (in the air). Khatho bo-boka-n, by-doadan
lokoaria kolheli fydikhida-the, ken ikhi-hi sika khi-ka kolheli-da ba. “When
you cook, steam comes out of your pot, and the fire gives smoke also.”
Possessed: tho-kolheli-a = its smoke.
KOLHEN (vs): red, orange. By-dykha, awalha kolhe-n. “Look, the ‘awara’ palm
fruits are orange.”
KOLHEN (vs): ripe. Kolhe-ka by-manikhinia-n? “Are your eating ripe bananas?”
KOLHI(-HI) (n): mouse, rat. De sikoa-n min-ka kho joho-n kolhi-hi. “My house
(has) many mice.”
KOLHIAKA (n): parrot kind.
KOLHIBIRO (n): fish (species) (ST: logologo).
KOLOKOARIA (pp): out of (fire, sunshine). See: kolokon, -aria.
KOLOKON (pp): in (fire, sunshine).
KOLOKONRO (pp): into (fire, sunshine). See: kolokon, -ro.
KOMAKATHI (n): caterpillar. Abaryky komakathi thyda bo, ken abaryky komakathi
ma-thydy-n-ka bo. “Some caterpillars sting you (i.e. cause a bad stinging
rash), and some caterpillars don’t sting you.”
KOMOJODYTHIMARO (n): powder. Possessed: da-komojodythimaro = my
powder.
KONAN (vi): walk. Kari-thi th-a-n doma da-kothi, wadili-ka kho taha da-kona-n.
“Because my feet want to hurt, it is impossible for me to walk far.”
KONOKHODO (n): Maroon. Konokhodo khareme-ka, ken thy-balha sikylhylhi-ka,
ken thy-dian thonoa-ka dolhi oria. “Maroons are black, and their hair is
kinky, and their language is different from Creoles (those living in the
capital).”
KONOKO (n): forest, jungle. Konoko b-osy-n m-eitha-n b-a-n bi-sina-koma. “If you
aren’t familiar with going in the jungle, you could get lost.” Possessed:
da-konoko-ra = my jungle.
KONOKOLHI (n): male peccary (either ST: pakira or ST: pingo).
KORA(-HA) (n): bed, hammock. Tora kora-ha donko-koana-ha. “That bed is a
thing on which to sleep.” Possessed: da-kora = my bed, hammock.
KORAN (vi): bake cassava bread. M-eibonoan koa th-a da-retho kora-n. “My wife
is still not finished baking bread.”
KORI(-HI) (n): spring, bathing place. We kori kho makyraken-tho to. “Our spring
does not dry up.”
KOROKORODAKOAN (adv): trembling manner.
KORON (vt): bake. Ma-koro-n koa b-a-bo bo-jorabania? “Aren’t you baking your
squeezed-out cassava yet.”
KORONOAN (vi): be baked. Wakhaja kho to khale koronoa-n. “The cassava bread
has been baked well.”
KOSA (n): needle. Da-kysa-thin bokolhoho; d-amyn-fa kosa th-alhinia. “I want to
sew clothes; I will have to a needle for it.” Possessed: da-kosa-the = my
needle.
KOSAN (pp): next to, close to. Bi-sika hala kosan no. “Set it down next to the bench.”
KOSANRO (pp): toward.
KOSI(-HI) (n): eye. Possessed: da-kosi = my eye.
KOTHI(-HI) (n): foot. Taha d-osa-ma da-kothi abo kona-n. “I can go far walking
with my feet.” Possessed: da-kothi = my foot.
148 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
KOTHI-IBIRA (n): toe. Min-ka kho tete-n da-kothi-ibira khondi; tetelio othika no.
“My toes itch a lot; athlete’s foot got them.”
KOTHIKE(-HE) (n): shoe (from kothi+eke ‘foot-container’). To da-kothike min-tho
kho sa-n. “My shoes are very good.” Possessed: da-kothike = my shoe.
KYDYN (vs): heavy (weight, load, task). To da-la-n min-tho kho kydy-n. “My
bench is very heavy.”
KYDYRO (n): stone. Kydyro diako by-manta-koma. “You could sharpen (some-
thing) on a stone.” Possessed: da-kydyro-n = my stone.
KYLYKAN (vi): point to, aim at. By-dykha lira siokothi khan kylyka-n-the
wa-manro. “Look at the little boy pointing towards us.”
KYLYKYN (vi): aim. Sare b-a kylyky-n; bo-koboda-ma no. “Aim well; you can
miss it.”
KYLYKYN (vd): offer. Da-denthi kamyn-ka aba wakhai-tho kho arakabosa da-myn;
ly-kylyky-ra tora da-myn-da no, ma de khi m-amyn-ka tho-jona. “My uncle has a
very good gun for me; he offered it to me, but I don’t have enough money.”
KYNDAN (vi): fish or hunt at night by blinding prey with light. Tanoke
olhika-ha d-osy-fa kyndan-ro. “Later tonight I will go shine for game.”
KYNDYN (vi): shine. Adali kyndy-n doma, makyra-bo to onikhan-be. “Because the
sun is shining, the creeks are drying up.”
KYRAN (vt): tie off. B-obada bania; de: sare d-a ja kyra-n da-thirithi-a-wa. “Wait a
moment; me: I am tying off my weaving well.”
KYRONOAN (vi): tied up, married, tied together. B-ika-n ken sa-n kakyn jady-n,
wakhaja kho by-kyronoa-n. “If you are married and life is going well, you
married well.”
KYRY (n): mother-in-law (mother of husband). Possessed: da-kyry = my
mother-in-law (mother of husband).
KYRYKYJA (n): clan, family name.
KYRYN (vt): tie, fasten by tying. Sa-re b-a kyry-n bo-kora-wa; thy-warokosoa-ma
b-abo bo-donko-n lokoa. “Tie your hammock well; it can let go on you
while you are sleeping.”
KYSA-KOANA (n): sewing machine. Aba kysa-koana da-jonta, ken wakhaja kho
thy-kysa-n. “I bought a sewing machine, and it sews well.”
KYSAN (vt, vi): sew. Aba kysa-koana da-jonta, ken wakhaja kho thy-kysan. “I
bought a sewing machine, and it sews well.”
KYSONOAN (vi): sewn. Wakhaja kho to bokolho-ho kysonoa-n. “The clothes are
sewn well.”
KYSYN (vt): fetch water. To kodo loko by-kysy-ba-the mimi-tho oniabo. “Go get
cold water in the gourd bottle.”
1. kysoan: drawn (water)
KYTHY (n): grandmother. Possessed: da-kythy = my grandmother.
LABA (n): capybara (species) (D: haas, hei).
LADAN (vi): chop with an ax.
LESEJOBE (n): grandchildren (collective).
LHANATYN, LHANATAN (vt): mix. Khatho ma-lhanaty-n b-a thy-n atha-ha,
mera-ke b-a-ma kho somole-n. “When you drink unmixed drink (i.e. not
mixing various kinds), you cannot get drunk as fast.”
LHEROKO(-HO) (n): mouth, lips. M-amy-n d-a-n kha da-lheroko, wadili-koma kho
da-dia-n. “If I didn’t have my mouth, I would not be able to talk.” Bianman
to lheroko da-simalha doma. “Because the barrel of my gun is double.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 149
MERAN, MIRAN (vs): fast, quick. Adia l-a mera-n osy-n-da. “He went very fast.”
MEREHE (n): cashew tree.
METHEDIN (vt): fatigue, tire. Ma tholha kho-da no, kiadoma waka kho
thy-methedi-n-da de. “But it was very heavy, so not much later it tired
me out.”
METHEN (vs): tired. Methe-ka de. “I am tired.”
MIAKA (tw): yesterday. Miaka d-anda forto-aria. “Yesterday I arrived from
town.”
MIBI (n): vine.
MIKODON, MIKODAN (vd): send. Wakharo wabo m-amyn d-a no, ma mothi
da-mikodo-fa-the bi-bithiro-da no. “At the moment I don’t have it, but to-
morrow I will send it to you (e.g. kerosene from the store).”
MIMIN (vs): cold, damp. Da-doadan mimi-ka hibin. “My pot is already cold.”
MIN (vs): small amount, minimum.
MIN...KHO, MIN-KA...KHO, MIN-THI...KHO, MIN-THO...KHO (vs): very. To
da-dykhy-n baren aba ori da-sibon: min-ka kho da-dyda-n. “Concerning me
suddenly seeing a snake before me: I jumped greatly.”
MIRAN (vs): fast, quick. See: meran.
MISIDIN (vt): iron, straighten. Bi-misidi farokha da-danake, sare b-a-li
kalhydakoto-n no. “If you iron my pants, you must fold them well.”
MITHADAN (vi): laugh. Sathi th-a-n doma andyn na-dian da-khonan,
da-mithada-ka. “Because their story seemed good to me, I laughed.”
MITHAKOTOAN (vi): be ridiculous, be comical. M-eithonoa-n l-a-n doma,
mithakotoa-ro l-a. “Because he was careless, he made himself ridiculous.”
MITHAN (vt): ridicule, laugh at someone. Li somole-thi na-koboroko-ren
thikhidi-n: min-ka kho na-mitha-n dei. “Concerning the drunk man falling
right among them: they ridiculed him.”
MODYN (vi): climb, go up. To fodi min-tho kho ajomyndin mody-n. “The monkey
climbs very high.”
MOLHIDAN (vi): lie, deceive. To jawyhy min koba kho molhida-n na atynoa-thi
kakythi-non. “The devil greatly deceived the first people.”
MOLHIDIN, MOLHIDYN (vt): lure by fooling (e.g. making sounds of a wounded
animal). Da-kanaba fodi; da-molhidi-fa-da no. “I heard birds; I am going
to lure them.”
MOLHIDOAN (vi): be deceived.
MOLHIDOAN (n): liar, deceiver. Lira to min-thi kho molhidoan; khidoanda-sia-ma
kho li. “That man is a great liar; he is not one who can be believed.”
MONEKATAN (vt): tease, torture, cause difficulty.
MORODA-KORO (n): airplane.
MORODON, MORODAN (vi): fly. To anoana omyndi kho moroda-ka. “The buz-
zard flies very great distances.”
MOTHEBOAN (tw): day after tomorrow. Motheboan d-osa-thi-bo jokha-nro. “The
day after tomorrow I want to go hunting.”
MOTHI (tw): tomorrow. Mothi to aba emelia-tho kasakabo khi-da ba. “Tomorrow
is a new day again.”
MOTHIA (tw): morning (6:00–9:00). Mothia d-osy-fa-the kabyja-nro;
d-obada-ha-the hokolhero boran. “In the morning I will go to the planting
ground; I will wait (lie in wait) for capybara.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 153
OLHALHO (n): cloud. Min-tho kho ajomonin to holhalho; alikan kho kodibio
moroda-ma ajomyn sabon th-adin. “The cloud is very high; no bird can fly
higher than it.”
OLHIDAN (vs): thin. To bokolho-ho min-tho kho olhida-n. “The clothes are very
thin.”
OLHIKA (n): night (18:00–6:00). Da-kona-ha-the lhykan olhika. “I am going to
walk the whole night.”
OLHIKA NEBETAN (tw): midnight. Olhika nebetan da-donko-ra-fa. “At midnight I
will probably be sleeping.”
OLHIROKO-SIBO (n): howler monkey.
OLHIROKON (vs): dark. Adianke th-a to olhika olhiroko-n. “The night is very
dark.”
OLHOMOLHEDAN (vi): ripple, have waves. Basada koa th-a-bo-the to oniabo
olhomolheda-n. “Slowly the water is getting wavy.”
OLHOMOLHEDAN (n): wave (e.g. in river or ocean). Aba oniabo olhomolhedan
ika-the to kojalha lokonro. “A wave of water came into the boat.”
OMA (n): piranha.
OMA (pp): with (accompaniment). B-osy-fa we oma? “Are you going with us?”
OMYNTYN (vt): approach. To da-kanaby-n to khota-be: da-lhoada omynty-n-da no.
“Concerning me hearing the animals: I crawled approaching them.”
ONABAN (vt): inform, report to. Motheboan th-a falhetho-be andy-fa-the, kiadoma
basia-non onaba-ka we. “The day after tomorrow Caucasians will come,
therefore the under-captains (of our village) informed us.”
ONABON (vt): answer. Na-dia farokha bo-myn, b-onaba-li. “If they speak to you,
you must answer.”
ONABON (vs): low. Tora aba ada-dynabo onabo sabo-ka. “That one tree branch is
a bit lower.”
ONABYN (vt): receive, get. To kathi halhan: d-onaby-fa sioko-tho khan
khaborokhodo-ho. “Concerning the end of the month: I will receive a lit-
tle bit of money.”
ONAKAN (vt): get, fetch (a person). Bakylama h-onaka-li-the da-ma. “You (PL)
must come get me in the afternoon.”
ONAKYN (vt): take along, bring along (a person). D-onaky-fa da-lykynthi-wa
bania, ken da-sika khi-fa-the l-oma-da ba. “I will (just) come get my
grandson for a short while, and (but) I will bring him back again.”
ONI (n): rain. Th-olhirokota-the to oni; min-fa-the kho thy-khin. “The rain is mak-
ing it dark (i.e. the darkness due to the rain clouds is causing darkness
to come); it will rain a lot.”
ONI KHA (tw): rainy season.
ONIABO, INIABO (n): water. By-tha-ma to iniabo, ken bo-sokosa-ma halhan
amathali th-abo. “You can drink water, and you can wash everything (all
kind of things) with it.” Possessed: da-nia = my water.
ONIKHAN (n): creek, small river. To da-onikhan mintho kho kadise-n; adiake th-a
hime tho-lokon-nin. “That creek of mine is aswarm (crawling with fish);
there are lots of fish in it.” Possessed: da-onikhan.
ONIKHIN (vi (incorporated subj)): rain. See: (oni)khin.
OREBIATHO (n): sister-in-law. Possessed: d-orebiathe = my sister-in-law.
OREBITHI (n): brother-in-law. Possessed: d-orebithi = my brother-in-law.
156 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
ORI (n): snake. Kasakero wadibero, ken labaria kia-be ryda; ken thy-kari thy-sika
bo-koborokon. “The rattle snake, the fer-de-lance, and the bushmaster
bite; and their poison they give to you (i.e. their bite is poisonous).”
ORIA, OJA (pp): from, away from. Kha kho jaha-thi-ja hibin wa-sikoa oria-da we.
“We were at that time already far away from our village.” Ken w-andy-n
konoko lokon, ta-thi-na-bo kho th-oria-da we. “And arriving in the forest,
we were not far away (from our destination).”
OSABONIN (DASE) (interj): what a pity.
OSYN (vi): go. Tanoke d-osy-fa bodeda-nro. “Later I will go fishing (with hook
and line).”
OSYRON (vs): plain, without purpose, in vain.
OTHIKAN (vi): meet. To waboroko bi nyka, ken de torabo lokhodi-fa; ken abanbo
th-andanin w-othika-fa. “You take that path, and I will go in that one;
and somewhere where the paths cross we will meet.”
OTHIKAN (vi): take place. Toho ama d-aka-sia bo jaha othika tho-bora koba, to
thy-bianthedonoan firo-tho fara-hy koba. “This which I am telling you
here took place before the second big fight (i.e. World War II).”
OTHIKHIN (vt): receive, get, find, catch. To kathi halhan-fa d-othika-ma-the
da-khaborokhodo-wa khan. “When the month runs out (i.e. at the end of
the month) I can receive some wages.” Tano bo-molhida-ka de, ma
abahan de othikhi-ha bo. “Today you deceived me, but sometime I’ll get
you.”
OTHIKOAN (vi): menstruate. Kathi-ma n-a na nonoathi othikoan. “Women men-
struate monthly.”
OTHIKONOAN (vi): become sick very quickly. Sakoa l-a-n kha li da-sa d-osa
jadan-ro, ken da-dikhin abare l-a othikonoa-n. “When I left on the trip my
child was well, and after I (had left) suddenly he became extremely
sick.”
OTO (n): daughter (also brother’s daughter). Possessed: da-to = my daughter.
OTORO, TORO (n): trunk (of a tree). Ada toro balyta holholho diako. “A tree
trunk lay on the ground.” Possessed: tho-toro = its trunk.
(H)OTOTOLHI (n): nail (for fastening). Possessed: da-totolhi-a = my nail.
(H)OTOTOLHI-KODOKOTO-KOANA (n): hammer.
OTOTOLHIDIN (vt): nail. Sare b-a ototolhidi-n to ada bo-kora borando;
tho-lhota-koma b-abo. “Nail the wood for your hammock well; it could
let go on you.”
PAMO (n): salt. Da-boko-n amyn da-sika pamo. “In my cooking I put salt.”
PERO (n): dog. Pero jokha-tho da-myn. “The dog is what hunts for me.” Pos-
sessed: da-pero-n = my dog.
POLATA (n): money. Da-nekhebo doma, d-amyn-ka polata. “Because of my work,
I have money.” Possessed: da-polata-n(-ia) = my money.
RABYDYKHY, RABOTYKHY (pp): against, opposed.
RAKASYN (vt): shake. Hebe farokha to maja, by-rakasa-ma thy-daja
thy-thikhidi-n-bia. “If the mangoes are ripe, you can shake its (the tree’s)
trunk so that they (mangoes) will fall.”
RAKOARIA (pp): out of (a fluid). See: rakon, -aria.
RAKON (pp): in (a fluid). Lira iniabo rako-ka. “He is in the water.”
REDAN (vt): sneak up on. Da-kanaba khota-ha; basada-re d-a-bo reda-n no. “I
heard an animal; slowly I am sneaking up on it.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 157
REKEN (vt): weed, pull weeds. Min-ka kho wakhaokhili da-koban bana; d-osy-fa
reke-n-ba no. “My planting ground is very weedy; I am going to go weed it.”
REMO (n): oar. Aba remo abo by-remodoa-ma to kojalha. “With an oar you can
row the boat.”
REMODOAN, REMODAN (vi, vt): row. Aba remo abo by-remodoa-ma to kojalha.
“With an oar you can row the boat.”
RENE (p): exactly.
RENETHO (n): sister-in-law (husband’s brother’s wife). Possessed: da-renetho =
my sister-in-law.
RENYMALITHI (n): brother-in-law (wife’s sister’s husband). Possessed:
da-renymalithi = my brother-in-law.
RIKENE (p): exactly.
RODYN (vt): wipe off, dry off. Tora erebe-tho jaraha by-roda. “Wipe off that dirt
there.”
ROKOARIA (pp): out of. See: rokon, -aria.
ROKON (pp): in (on the inside surface of, e.g. a hand, bowl, etc.). Polata
da-khabo roko-ka. “There is money in my hand.”
ROKONRO (pp): into. See: rokon, -ro.
ROKOSAN (vi): move around. Da-fara-ba to khota d-a-ja, ma tho-rokosa-ka koan.
“I killed the animal, I had thought, but it still moved around.”
ROKOSYN, ROKOSON (vi): shiver, tremble. Min kho himili-n-da de; rokoso-re
khan th-a da-tala khona. “I am very cold; my jaws are chattering.”
RON, -RON (p): only. Abaro ron osa-ma da-ma. “Only one person can go with me.”
RYDAN (vi): chew. Sare b-a ryda-n to khota siroko khona; by-kyda-ma th-abo.
“Chew well on the meat; you can choke on it.”
RYDYN (vt): bite. B-aithoa tora pero myn; thy-rydy-ne-n-da bo! “Be careful of the
dog; it bites!”
SABADAN (vi): beat wet clothes with a stick to wash them.
SABO (p): more (comparative, superlative).
SAKEN (p): exactly, just.
SALABADYN, SALABADAN (vt, vi): to square up a log with an ax (in prepara-
tion for sawing it into planks).
SALAKYDYKYTAN (vt): fry in oil.
SALHI (n): bird (species).
SAMALHI (n): cassava grater.
SAN (vs): good, well.
(Y)SANOTHI (n): children (collective).
SAPATO (n): shoe, slipper, footgear. See: kothike.
SARE(N) (adv): well.
SAREKEN (vs): better.
SATHI (n): young man (18–35 years old).
SATHO (n): young woman (18–35 years old).
SEKEN (vs): dirty, messy. To bokolho-be min-ka kho seke-n. “The clothes are very
dirty.”
SEKHIDIN, SEKHIDAN (vt): saw.
SEMEN (vs): sweet, unfermented, tasty, delicious. Adia th-a-ja seme-n tho-boka-n,
to hiaro. “She cooks deliciously, the woman.” De ythan seme koama. “My
drink (e.g. a barrel of cassava beer) is still sweet (when it should be
fermented).”
158 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
SIMAKYN (vt): call. Siokothi, by-simaky-ba-the b-ojo bania. “Little boy, go call
your mother (i.e. go call and come back and do it in a short time).”
SIMALHA (n): arrow, gun. Wakhili, m-amyn koa d-a-n kha arakabosa, simalha
matho simalhabo abo ron da-jokha koba. “Long ago, when I didn’t yet
have a gun, I hunted with only arrow and bow.” Possessed: da-simalha
= my arrow/gun.
SIMALHABO (n): bow. Wakhili, m-amyn koa d-a-n kha arakabosa, simalha matho
simalhabo abo ron da-jokha koba. “Long ago, when I didn’t yet have a
gun, I hunted with only arrow and bow.” Possessed: da-simalhabo = my
bow. See: simalha.
SIMITHAN (n): laugher, giggler. Tora hiaro min-tho kho simithan to. “That
woman is a giggler.”
SIMODO (n): jewelry.
SIN (pp): at the tip of.
SINRO (n): nose.
SIOKHAN (adv): short time, shortly.
SIOKHANIN (tw): little while.
SIOKON (vs): little, small. Aba sioko-tho khan bahy da-malhithi-fa. “I am going to
make (build) a small house.”
SIOKOTHI (n): boy.
SIOKOTHO (n): girl.
SIPALHALI (n): iron, steel. Balho thy-malhithi-sia sipalhali abo. “Axes are made of
iron.”
SIRI(-HI) (n): nose. Da-siri lokhodi d-akoba. “Through my nose I breathe.” Pos-
sessed: da-siri = my nose.
SIROABALI (n): tree (species) (ST: pisie).
SIROKO (n): headwater. Abathali w-othika onikhan siroko, ken thy-taka alokosia
wa-myn. “After a while we found the headwaters of a little creek, and it
stopped/quenched our thirst for us.”
SIROKO(-HO) (n): meat, flesh. Da-jabydy-fa to khota siroko; ken ama ibara-tho
koan, kia da-boko-fa. “I will roast the animal meat; and what is still left
over, that I will boil.” Possessed: da-siroko = my flesh.
SOADYN (vt): pour (a drink). Lira kho sathi soada-na-ma to atha wa-myn? “Can’t
that young man pour the drink for us (i.e. do the job of serving cassava
beer)?”
SOBOLEN (vs): green. Kalhao sobole-ka. “Grass is green.”
SODAN (vt): strain, sieve through a cloth. Sa-thi-n by-thy-n to kasiri, bo-soda-fa
bania-da no. “If you want to drink good cassava beer, just sieve it a
little.”
SODON (vt): peel. Khali by-malhita-thi-n, bo-sodo-fa to khali-doli khona. “If you
want to make cassava bread, you must peel the cassava tubers.”
SOKAN (vi): chop open a planting ground (chop/cut down the trees so they can
be burned), clear a planting ground. Da-khojaba da-jono-a na-soka-nbia
da-koban-nin da-myn. “I asked my family to (help with) the job of clear-
ing at my planting ground for me.”
SOKON (vt): chop (with an ax or machete). Malhi-koma tora ada bo-sokon
da-myn? “Would you please chop that tree for me?”
160 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
SOKONOAN (vi): get chopped, get cut, get a cut wound. Aba ada dondakota
da-kasipara-n; kiadoma da-sokoa da-kothi khona. “A stick deflected my
machete; therefore I cut myself on my foot.”
SOKOSAN (vi): do the wash (i.e. clothing). Komyky-re th-a to oniabo; ali-ma
n-a-n sokosa-n? “The water is murky; how can they wash?”
SOKOSOAN (vi): wash one’s self, get washed, bathe. D-osy-ha bahy-nro bania;
da-sokosoa-fa-ba siokhanin. “I will go home a minute; I will go wash up a
bit.”
SOKOSON (vt): wash. Sare b-a bo-sokoso-n by-khabo-a, bo-khoto-n dikhi. “Wash
your hands well, after you eat.”
SOLHI(-HI) (n): small hunting path.
SOLHINAMA (n): river, Suriname river. Solhinama lokhodi by-jada-ma by-kanan
abo. “In the river you can travel by boat.”
SOLHISOLHI (n): parrot (species).
SOMOLEN (vs): drunk. Adiake l-a thy-n, kiadoma min-ka kho somole-n dei. “He
drank exceedingly, therefore he is very drunk.”
SONDAKHA (n): Sunday.
SONKAN (vt): spill. Adiake n-a-n thy-n doma, sonka-ro n-a to atha-ha. “Because
they have drunk exceedingly, they only spill the drink.”
SONKON (vt): pour out. To erebe-tho oniabo bo-sonko-ba tabo. “Go pour out the
dirty water over there.”
SORE(-HE) (n): diarrhea. Sore-di-thi de. “I have diarrhea.”
SOROTON (vt): suck. Sioko d-a-n kha, min koba kho da-jo odio da-soroto-n.
“When I was little, I sucked my mother’s breasts a lot.”
SYKYLHIDIN (vt): pinch.
SYRYBYDYN, SYRYBYDAN (vt): sweep (e.g. with a broom). Sare b-a syrybydy-n
to bahy lokhodi. “Sweep well inside the house.”
SYTY (n): monkey (species) (D: sagowentje).
TA (vs): far. Ken w-andy-n konoko lokon, ta-thi-na-bo kho th-oria-da we. “And arriv-
ing in the forest, we were not far away (from our destination).” See: tahan.
TABYSIAN (vs): sleepy. Tabysia-ka de. “I am sleepy.”
TAHAN, TA (vs): far. Taha-n doma to waboroko, wadili-koma kho aba kasababo
d-andy-n tho-boloko-n. “Because the road is far (long), it is impossible for
me to reach its end in one day.”
TAKAN (vt): dam up.
TAKOANA(-HA) (n): roof. See: ado(-ho).
TAKONOAN (vi): stop, come to a stop. Abare th-a to takonoa-n to
falhetho-dalhidi-koana. “The car stopped suddenly.”
TAKYN (vt): close, shut. San doma da-taty-n thy-sikoa, to jesere, wadili-ka kho
thy-fothikhidi-n. “Because I closed the burrow of the armadillo well, it is
impossible for it to exit.”
TAKYN (vt): cover. Ta sabo da-faryn doma to khotaha, ma-wadili-ka-the da-nyky-n
no; ken taky-n-ro d-a th-awa. “Because it was far away where I killed the
animal, I could not carry it back; and I covered it.”
TAKYN (vi, vt): stop. W-andy farokha Paranam nin, siokhan b-a-na-ma kho taky-n?
“(speaking to the bus driver:) When we arrive in Paranam, can’t we
stop a little while?” Abathali w-othika onikhan siroko, ken thy-taka
alokosia wa-myn. “After a while we found the headwaters of a little
creek, and it stopped/quenched our thirst for us.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 161
TALA(-HA) (n): jaw, chin. Da-tala khondi ka-balha khona; kia to-da da-thima.
“(The body of) my jaw is hairy; that is my beard.” Possessed: da-tala =
my jaw.
TANBO (n): fish trap.
TANO(-HO) (tw): today. Tano to kasakabo bali-bo khi ba. “Today the day is pass-
ing also (time is passing too quickly again).”
TANO-MAKERON (tw): a very short time ago today, just now.
TANOKE (tw): later, a bit later (today). Tanoke d-osy-fa bodedan-ro. “Later I will
go fishing.”
TATA(-HA) (n): power, strength.
TATABO (n): tree (species) (D: zwarte kabes).
TATAN (vs): hard, tough, strong. Katororo min-ka kho tata-n siroko. “The tapir
(has) very tough meat.” Min-ka kho tata-n to hala diako. “The bench is
very hard (to sit on).”
TE(-HY), (Y)TE (n): stomach, belly. Ma-te-n kha de, alon-ka th-osa-ma, to
da-khi-sia khota-ha? “If I didn’t have a stomach, where could it go, the
food which I eat?” Possessed: da-te = my stomach.
TE(-HY)-IBIRA, (Y)TE-IBIRA (n): intestines. Da-fary-n khota-ha, thy-te-ibira
ma-nykyn d-a; firo-koro thy-te ron da-nyka. “(When) I kill an animal, I
don’t take its small intestines; I only take its stomach.” Possessed:
da-te-ibira = my intestines.
TE-FIRO(-HO), (Y)TE-FIRO (n): stomach (the organ). Khatho da-khoto-n,
da-te-firo loko-nro th-osa da-mykydy-sia. “When I eat, what I swallow
goes into my stomach.” Possessed: da-te-firo = my stomach.
TEBEDAN (vi): touch.
TELETELEN (vs): slippery. Adiake th-a to waboroko teletele-n. “The road is very
slippery.”
TEODYN (vt): bend. Abaryky ada wakhaja kho by-teody-n. “Some kinds of wood
you can bend well.”
TETEDAN (vt): scratch an itch.
TETEDIN (vt): itch. M-andy-n b-a to jolhika; thy-tetedi-ha bo. “Don’t touch the
moko-moko water plant; it will give you an itchy rash.”
TETEI (n): rope, string. Aba ma-wadi-tho tetei d-ansi-ka. “I want a short rope.”
TETELHOMA (n): tree (species) (ST: wana, red louro).
TETELIO (n): itchy rash, athlete’s foot, fungus infection. Min-ka kho tete-n
da-kothi-ibira khondi; tetelio othika no. “My toes itch terribly; athlete’s
foot got them.”
THA (p): REPORT, reportative.
THABAKOTON (vt): separate. Khatho-fa holholho ibonoan-fa, Adajali thabakoto-fa
sa-be-thi wakhaja-be-thi oria. “When the world ends, God will separate
the good from the bad.”
THEREN (vs): hot. Da-doadan there-ka hibin. “My pot is already hot.”
THETHEDAN (vi): whisper.
THIADYN (vt): stab, prick. B-aithoa to jadoala myn; by-thikhida-ma tho-boloko-n;
thy-thiada-ma bo. “Be careful of the knife; you could fall on its point; it
could stab you.”
THIDIN (vt): clean hair or feathers off an animal.
THIKEBETOAN (vi): steal. Ma-nekhebo-thi b-a-n doma, thikebetoa-ro b-a. “Because
you don’t want to work, you only go about stealing.”
162 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
THIKHIDIN (vi): fall. Sare b-a dykhyn bo-boro-a; by-thikhida-ma. “Look before
yourself well (i.e. watch where you are going); you can fall.”
THIKHIN (tw): at first.
THIKIN (vi): dig. To khota-ha, ‘jesi’ na-sia myn, min-tho kho thiki-n. “The animal
they call ‘jesi’ (armadillo) can dig very well (or much).”
THILIKHITHI (n): brother (of a female). Possessed: da-thilikhithi = my brother.
THIMA(-HA) (n): beard.
THIMA-KOANA(-HA) (n): bridge. Ma-thima-koana-n kha de, wadili-koma kho
da-thima-n th-olaboan-ro. “If I didn’t have a bridge, I would be unable to
cross to the other side.” Possessed: da-thima-koana = my bridge.
THIMAN (vi): cross, go through to the other side. Ma-thima-koanan kha, de
wadili-koma kho da-thima-n th-olaboan-ro. “If I were without a bridge, I
would be unable to cross to the other side.” Aba jolhadoa-koana
d-amon-i-n kha, da-thima-koma th-olaboan-ro. “If I had a boat, I could
cross to the other side.”
THIMIN (vt): swim. Bi wadili-koma thimi-n to onikan olaboan-ro? “Are you able to
swim to the other side of the creek?”
THINATHI(-HI) (n): collective father. Possessed: wa-thinathi: our collective
father (i.e. our God)
THIO (n): daughter-in-law (of male or female). Possessed: da-thio = my
daughter-in-law.
THIRIKHIDIN (vt): push. Wa-thirikhida-the to kojalha khona oniabo rakonro. “We
came to push the canoe into the water.”
1. thirikhidan: push/shove someone on purpose
THITAN (vi): beat.
THITHI (n): son-in-law (of a woman). Possessed: da-thithi = my son-in-law.
THO (pro): she, her, it, its, they (non-human), their (non-human). Tho
sokosa-bo. “She is washing clothes.”
1. tho khabo: her hand
2. To to tho myn: It is for her.
THOBOLHIDIN (vt): knot, tie. Bo-thoboda farokha bo-kora-wa, sare b-a-li
thobolhidi-n no. “If you hang up your hammock, you must tie it well.”
THOJON (vs): mature.
THOJOSIKOA (n): city. B-osy-n thojosikoa-nro, halhan amathali by-dykha-ma; ken
halhan amathali bo-jonta-ma. “Going to town, you can see all sorts of
things; and you can buy all sorts of things.”
THOJOTHI (n): elder, old person, old man.
THOJOTHO (n): elder [–male], old woman.
THOKODON (vi): descend, sink, land, disembark. W-anda wa-sikoa-noa hibin;
wa-thokoda-the falhetho-dalhidi-koana lokoaria. “We have arrived at our
house already; let’s descend out of the bus.” Adia th-a-n koratonoa-n
wandali, tho-thokoda-the, to moroda-koro. “At exactly the stroke of noon,
it landed, the airplane.”
THOLHADYN (vi): explode.
THOLHAN (vs): light (in weight). Li da-wajalhi-a min-thi kho tholha-n. “My carry-
ing basket is very light.”
THOLHODON (vi): lie down to rest. To kakosiro kasakoda osa khota-nro, ken
kasakabo tho-tholhoda. “The deer goes to eat at night, and it sleeps in
the daytime.”
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 163
WADIN (vs): long. Aba ada wadi-tho da-lhyky-fa. “I am going to cut a long
stick.”
WADON (vs): old. To da-dalhidi-koana: min-ka kho wado-n. “My car: it is very old.”
WADYN (vt): fan. By-nyka to walhiwalhi, ken by-wada to ikhi-hi th-inyky-n-thi.
“Take the fan, and fan the fire (so) it starts.”
WADYN (vi): search, look for. Da-jadoalan da-bolheda, kia bithiro wady-thi-bo de.
“I lost my ax; that is what I am searching (lit: a searcher) for.”
WAJA, WARIA (pp): from, of, originating from. See: waria, -aria, -aja.
WAJALHI (n): basket (usually used by men). Khatho d-osy-n kaboja-nro, da-nyka
da-wajalhia-wa ikhikhodo da-nykyn-bia. “When I go to my planting
ground, I carry my (men’s) basket for me to carry firewood.” Possessed:
da-wajalhi-a = my basket.
WAKA: a long time.
WAKHAITHO AMATHALI (n): sin, bad thing.
WAKHAJAN (vs): bad, ugly. Lira da-sikoa-n min-thi kho wakhajan. “That house of
mine is very ugly (but he has affection for the house, therefore
[+male] forms are used]).”
WAKHARO, AKHARO (tw): now, this moment. Wakharo, kho wadili sabo-ka tadi
da-jady-n. “Nowadays I can’t travel far any more.”
WAKHILI (tw): long ago (time of our forefathers). Wakhili, bikhidolia d-a-n kha,
min-thi kho jokha-n de. “In the old days, when I was young, I was a
great hunter.”
WAKYDONOAN, WAKYDOAN (vi): burst, break. Bo-lhoto-ne bo-kodo-ja khonan!
Thy-wakydoa-ma. “Don’t let go of your gourd bottle! It can burst.”
WAKYDYN (vt): burst, break. See: wakydonoan.
WALHAKABA (n): bird (species) (ST: kamikami, trumpet bird).
WALHIWALHI (n): fan. Ikhi i da-wada da-walhiwalhi-a abo. “I fan the fire with
my fan.” Possessed: da-walhiwalhi-a = my fan.
WAN (vs): dry. Wa-ka to bokolho-ho? “Are the clothes dry?”
WAN: us-benefactive (contraction of wa-myn).
WANDALI (tw): noon. Da-khoto-fa wandali. “I will eat at noon.”
WARIA, WAJA (pp): from, of, originating from. Halhan amathali malhiti-tho
Adajali waria-tho to. “Everything created is what comes from God.”
WASIBA (n): tree (species) (greenheart).
WASINA(-HA)(n): heart. Da-wasina m-amyn d-a-n kha, wadili-koma kho kaky-n de.
“If I didn’t have a heart, I wouldn’t be able to live.” Possessed:
da-wasina = my heart.
WA-THINATHI (n): God (our collective father). See: Adajali.
WATOA-KOANA(HA) (n): towel. M-amyn d-a-n kha da-watoa-koana, wadili-koma
kho da-khondi da-rody-n. “If I didn’t have a towel, I wouldn’t be able to
dry my body.” Possessed: da-watoa-koana = my towel.
WATYN (vt): dry. Sare b-a waty-n to bokolho-ho; mimi koa th-a-ma. “Dry the
clothes well; they may be still damp.”
WE (pro): we, us, our. We kojo-fa. “We will leave.” We sikoa to. “It is our
house.”
1. To to we myn: It is for us.
WEDIN (vi): vomit.
WELADYN, WELADAN (vt): hang.
A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak 165
WEREBEN (vs): warm. Tano min-ka kho werebe-n to kasakabo. “Today is a very
warm day.”
WESI (n): fish (species) (ST: datra).
WIRIBISIRI (n): deer (small, dwarf species).
WIWA, IWA (n): star. Kasakoda ron by-dykha-ma to wiwa-be. “Only at night can
you see the stars.”
WIWIDAN (vi): whistle. Da-wiwida aba jeni khan. “I whistled a little song.”
YBALHA, BALHA(-HA) (n): hair, feather, sea. See: balha(-ha).
YDA(-HA) (n): skin, hide. De yda kolhe-ka, ken abaryky-no yda halhira, ken
abaryky-no yda kharemen. “My skin is red, and the skin of another is
white, and the skin of another is black.” Possessed: da-da = my skin.
1. ada-yda: bark
YDIA(-HY) (n): word, message, news, story. See: (y)dia(-hy).
YDIAN (vi): talk, speak. See: dian.
YJA(-HA) (n): image, photo, spirit. Sare b-a dinaby-n, sa-n-bia thy-rybytonoa-n
b-yja. “Stand well, so that your image can be removed well (i.e. photo
can be taken well).”
YJAN (vi): cry, weep. To w-osy-n kaboja-nro: min-ka kho ly-ja-n li wa-sa siokothi
khan wa-khonan. “Concerning our going to the planting ground: our
young son cried a lot for us.”
YJE(-HY) (n): tongue. Da-je abo da-dia-ka, ken da-je abo da-bela khi-ko-ma-da.
“With my tongue I talk, and with my tongue I can also lick.” Possessed:
da-je = my tongue.
YJIN (vi): cry, weep. To thy-sa odo-n: min-ka kho th-yji-n to jonatho-ho. “Concern-
ing her child dying: her female ancestor (i.e. mother) cried greatly.”
YKHA (tw): now, when.
YKYRA, KYRA (n): root. Thy-kyra bokoto-sia to ada holholho koborokon. “Its roots
are what hold a tree in the ground.” Possessed: thy-kyra = its root.
YLHIBISIN, LHIBISIN (vt): roll. Da-lhyka-n bena to ada, da-lhibisi-fa oniabo
rako-nro no. “After I cut the tree, I will roll it into the water.”
1. ylhibisan: to work rolling trees
YLHIHIN (vs): brown, gray (between dark and light in color). Toro bikhidoliatho
ylhihin. “That young woman there is dark (-skinned).”
YLHYDABAN (vs): blue. Ylhydaba to khota-ha, thy-boadoa-bo. “(When) the meat
is blue, it is spoiling.”
YMADIANTHI, OMADIANTHI, MADIANTHI (n): companion, buddy, comrade.
Sare b-a-li kaky-n b-omadianthi oma. “You must live well (in peace and
harmony) with your companions/comrades.” Sare w-a-the ymadianthi
oma kaky-n. “Let us live well (in peace and harmony) with our compan-
ions.” Possessed: da-madianthi = my comrade.
YRA (n): juice. Abaryky konokhodi-tho mibi yra sa ythy-nbia. “The juice of some
jungle vines is good to drink.”
1. dio-yra: milk (lit: breast juice)
2. sikalho-yra: sugarcane juice
YSA, SA (n): child, offspring. Da-sa min-ka kho hebekhanin, kiadoma min-ka kho
alekhebe-n de. “My child is growing up very well, therefore I am very
happy.” Possessed: da-sa = my child.
1. ysanothi: children (collective group)
166 A Short Lexicon of Suriname Arawak
YSA, SA (n): egg. Da-khi-n bora-da no, to kalhina sa, da-boko-fa bania-da no. “Be-
fore I eat it, the egg, I cook it a short while.”
YSANOTHI, SANOTHI (n): children (collective). Possessed: wa-sanothi = your
and my children, altogether.
YTHAN (n): drink (usually alcoholic or fermented). Possessed: da-than-ia = my
drink. See: atha(-ha).
YTHY(-HY) (n): blood. To da-thyna-bynaha da-bikhi-n kha, min-koma kho da-thyna
osy-n d-oria. “If I cut my blood vessel, I could lose a lot of blood.” Pos-
sessed: da-thyna = my blood.
English Index for Lexicon
a aba quant
able -ma
able wadilin vi
about khonan pp
about (a subject) diakon pp
above adi pp
absent kawan vs
acquainted with aithin, aithan, eithin vt
add khisidan vi
adverbializer, ADV -ke, -ko, -re, -ro
after bena pp
after dikhi pp
after inaboa pp
after jabon, jabonro pp
after (locative, temporal) inabo pp
afternoon (16:00–20:00) bakylama tw
again ba, khi...ba p
against rabydykhy, rabotykhy pp
aim kylykyn vi
aim at kylykan vi
airplane ajomyndi-koro, moroda-koro n
alive kaky koan vi
all halhan n
alligator kajokothi n
almost hibin p
already hibin p
also waboken p
also like badia p
167
168 English Index for Lexicon
although balhin p
always -ro
ambitious emekhon vs
among koboroko pp
among makhana pp
among nakanrokon, nakanrokonro pp
and ken, mathi, matho conj
anger, make angry eimatan, ematan vt
angry (be) eimatonoan, ematonoan vi
animal khota(-ha) n
answer onabon vt
approach amyntyn, omyntyn vt
motion approaching -the
approximation diathi n
Arawak loko(no) n
area maja n
in the area of maria, maja pp
arm (whole arm with hand) dyna(-ha) n
armadillo kind (‘kapasi’) andadike, jesi n
armadillo kind jesere n
arrive andyn vi
arrow simalha n
arrow (for hunting birds) malhoa n
arrow cane ihi n
ash balisi n
ashamed habori(n) vs, n
ask adakoton vd
ask khojabyn vt
associate madianthi, ymadianthi n
at amyn pp
at khona pp
at khonaro, khonanro pp
at -n (contraction of nin)
at (generalized locative) nin pp
at first atynoa, thikhin tw
athlete’s foot tetelio n
attempt khisidin vt
attentive manner dykhakoan adv
attributive, ATTR k(A)-
aunt (mother’s sister) jaboatho n
be aware of kajadan vi
AWAY -ba
away, away from, from -ria, -ja
away, away from oria, oja pp
English Index for Lexicon 169
ax balho n
BACK -the
back (body part) abo n
to the back of jabonro pp
bad wakhajan vs
bad man/boy malokonisiathi n
bad thing wakhaitho amathali n
bake koron vt
bake cassava bread koran vi
be baked koronoan vi
ball bala n
banana (eating variety) manikhinia n
barter jalokhotan vi,vt
basket (used by women) keke, kekere n
basket (used by men) wajalhi n
basketry box clothes borodi n
bathe (y)kan, sokosoan vi
bathing place kori(-hi) n
be to copula
beam (of building) bajolha n
beard thima(-ha) n
beat thitan vi
beat (win) motyn vt
beat wet clothes sabadan vi
because doma pp
because of that kiadoma p
bed kora(-ha) n
before bithiro pp
before boran pp
before sibon pp
before (temporal) bora pp
befuddled maithandyn vs
beg khojaboan, khojabonoan vi
begin einatan, inatan vi
begin einatyn, inatyn vt
make a beginning at einatan, inatan vi
behind dikhi pp
behind inabo pp
behind jaboa pp
behind jabon, jabonro pp
believe khidoandyn vt
belly te(-hy), (y)te n
bench abola, abala, hala n
bend teodyn vt
170 English Index for Lexicon
from koborokoaria pp
from waria, waja pp
from (abbrev. of waria) -ria, -ja
from off the surface of diakoaria pp
from then, from there joaria p
in front of jaboaria pp
in front of sibon pp
fruit iwi n
have fruit kiwihin vi
fry in oil salakydykytan vt
full heben vs
fully hyryren adv
fungus infection of skin tetelio n
futile malhira p
future imperfective, INCH -(n)bia
future perfective, FUT -fa, -ha
get bykhyn, nykyn, onabyn vt
get onakan, othikhin vt
giggler (one who giggles) simithan n
girl siokotho n
girl (near puberty) ilontho n
give sikin vt
give (abbrev. of sikin) sia vt
glad alekheben, halekheben vs
glue (of cassava starch) halho n
go osyn vi
go around catching bokotan vt, vi
go around making fires bitakan vt
go around throwing things jokhan vi
go around wounding ikolhidan vi
go on an outing jadoan vi
go through to other side thiman vi
go up modyn vi
God adajali n
God (our maker) wa-malhita-koanathi n
God (our PL father) wa-thinathi n
gold helotho, kalemero n
gone halhan vs
be gone kawan vs
good san vs
goof kobodonoan, kobodoan vi
gourd bottle kodo n
gourd bowl ida n
gourd spoon halhalho n
180 English Index for Lexicon
grab bokoton vt
grain kalhao, kalho n
grandchildren (collective) lesejobe n
granddaughter lykyntho n
grandfather dokothi n
grandfather (vocative) dokoko n
grandmother kythy n
grandson lykynthi n
grass kalhao, kalho n
grate cassava tubers ansan vi
grated, squeezed cassava joraha n
gray ylhihin vs
green kalhao ?
green sobolen vs
grip bokoton vt
ground holholho n
grow bikhidin, bikhidan vt
grow bikhidonoan vi
gun arakabosa, simalha n
habilitative, HABIL -ma
hair (y)balha(-ha) n
half nakan, olaboa n
hammer (h)ototolhi-kodokoto-koana n
hammock hamaka, kora(-ha) n
hand khabo(-ho) n
handle bokoto-koana n
hang jolhodoan vi
hang weladyn, weladan vt
hang, hang up jodokoton vt
happen balin vi
happen, take place othika vi
happy alekheben, halekheben vs
make happy alekhebetan vt
hard tatan vs
hat si-ado(-ho) n
hate katelokojan, -telokojan vs, vt
haul a load nakaratoan vi
have amyn, amon vt
having k(A)-
hawk bariri n
he li, l(Y)-, -i pro
he lihi pro
he lira, liraha, lirabo pro
head (i)si(-hi) n
English Index for Lexicon 181
headwater siroko n
heal isadan vt
be healed isadonoan, isadoan vi
hear kanaban vt
able to hear ikadyren vi
heart (y)loa, loa(-hy) n
heart wasina(-ha) n
give heart (encourage) loatyn vt
heavy (weight, load, task) kydyn vs
help boratyn vt
be helpful boratan vt
her no, -n pro
her tho, th(Y)- pro
her-BEN (abbrev.) thon pp
here ja(ha), ja(di)(-hi), ja(ra)
hide jakhatyn, jakhatan vt
hide yda(-ha) n
high ajomyn vs
hill holholho n
him dei, -i pro
him-BEN (abbrev.) lon pp
his li, l(Y)- pro
hit with the hand or fist fatadyn vt
hold bokoton vt
hole (h)ole n
make holes oladan vi
hook (for fishing) bode(-he) n
hooved animal koadoa-kothiro n
horse koadoa-kothiro n
hot theren vs
hour khisiba n
house bahy n
house sikoa(-hy) n
how alika, halika qw, rp
how long, as long as halima qw, rp
how many fata qw
hug nykan vi
human kakythi n
human [–Arawak] kakytho n
hungry fonasian vs
hunt jokhan vi
husband erethi, rethi n
I de, d(A)- pro
if farokha, harokha p
182 English Index for Lexicon
lips lheroko(-ho) n
listen kanabyn vt
little siokon vs
little while siokhanin tw
live kakyn vi
live at, reside sikoatonoan, sikoatoan vi
liver bana n
load lokoton, lokotan vt
load nakara n
load a gun loporo(n)tadan vi
locative, LOC -n
long wadin vs
long ago (ancestor’s time) wakhili tw
look for wadyn vi
lose bolhedin vt
loud kakanakyn vs
love ansin, kansin vt
low onabon vs
lure molhidin, molhidyn vt
lying down bolhekoan, bylhekoan vi
machete kasipara n
be mad eimatonoan, ematonoan vi
madden eimatan, ematan vt
main structure khondi n
make malhithin vt
make angry eimatan, ematan vt
make bigger firotyn, firotan vt
male wadili n
man kakythi, wadili n
one man aba-li n
mango maja n
manner koa(n) p
in manner lokhodi adv
in manner lokokoan adv
how many fata qw, rp
many johon vs
mark, make marks bylhytyn vt
Maroon konokhodo n
married kyronoan vi
marry ikan vi
massage dylhydan vi
master tynamaro n
mated with bianthetoan vi
mature thojon vs
English Index for Lexicon 185
may -ma
maybe -baha
me de pro
me-BEN (abbrev. da-myn) dan pp
a meal khoton n
meat khota(-ha) n
meat siroko(-ho) n
medicine ibihi n
meet othikan vi
menstruate othikoan vi
message (y)dia(-hy) n
messy ereben, ireben vs
messy seken vs
metamorphose besoan, besonoan vi
metamorphose repeatedly besoabesoadyn vi
midday, noon kasakabo nebetan tw
middle nakan n
middle nebetan
in the middle of nakanrokon pp
midnight kasakoda nakan tw
midnight kasakoda nebetan tw
midnight olhika nebetan tw
minimum min vs
mirror dykhy-koana n
miss kobodyn, kobodan vt
mistake kobodoa(-hy) n
make a mistake kobodonoan, kobodoan vi
mix lhanatyn, lhanatan vt
moist jojon vs
moisten jojoton vt
molar ari(-hi) n
moment (at this moment) akharo, wakharo tw
momentarily bania tw
money khaborokhodo(-ho) n
money polata, sensi n
monkey (generic) fodi n
monkey (species) hao n
monkey (species) kakosalokoro n
monkey (capuchin) fodi n
monkey (howler) olhiroko-sibo n
monkey (‘kwasiekwasie’) khibihi n
monkey (‘monkiemonkie’) koboasi n
monkey (red howler) hitolhi n
monkey (‘sagowentje’) syty n
186 English Index for Lexicon
next to bithi pp
next to kosan pp
night (18:00–6:00) olhika n
nighttime (21:00–24:00) kasakoda tw
nine bithithian num, quant
no (not her/it) mantha p
no (not him) manla p
no (not me) manda p
no (not action/situation) mani(n) p
no (not them) manna p
no (not you) manba p
no (not you-PL) manha p
nominalized -n
nominalizer (occupation) -lhin
nominalizer [+human] -no
nominalizer [+male +human] -li
nominalizer [– male] -ro
noon kasakabo nebetan tw
noon wandali tw
nose sinro n
nose siri(-hi) n
not kho p
not m(A)-
not forget koborokoan vt
not lazy emekhon vs
not sharp mamanan vs
nothing ama kho, ama diaro n
nothing to do about it malhira p
notice kajadyn, kajadyn vt, vi
noun generalizer, NGEN -hY
now akharo, wakharo, ykha tw
oar remo n
obey kanabyn...khonan vi
object relativizer, WH.OBJ -sia
ocean balha(-ha), (y)balha n
of waria, waja pp
off of diakoaria pp
offer kylykyn vd
offspring ysa, sa n
oh my! okhokho
oil khi(-hi) n
old (mature) adajan vs
old (not new) wadon vs
old man thojothi n
188 English Index for Lexicon
place sikin vt
plain osyron vs
plant bikhidan vt
plant bonyn, bynyn vt
plant a planting ground bonan, bynan vi
planting ground kaboja, kabyja, koban n
plants (domesticated) khythehe n
plate (to eat from) karobo n
play biran vi
play around birabiradyn vi
please malhi-koma
pluck ojin vt
pluralizer [+/ – human] -be
pluralizer [+human] -non
point khisin vi
point of (at the point of) bolokon pp
point out dykhytyn vd
point to kylykan vi
poison fish jalhidin vi
police officer (m. or f.) bariri n
polish helodon vt
poor kamoneka, kamothinan vs
portion bena n
possess amyn, amon vt
possessed, POSS -n, -ra, -the, -ja
post base n
pot (cooking pot) doada n
pound (e.g. cassava) etan, itan vi
pour (a drink) soadyn vt
pour out sonkon vt
powder komojodythimaro n
power tata(-ha) n
praise firotan...iri vt
pray khojaboan, khojabonoan vi
pre-dawn (3:00–6:00) kasakonro tw
pre-dawn (3:00–6:00) mothiaro tw
prepare isadan vt
be prepared isadonoan, isadoan vi
present imperfective -bo
present perfective -ka
press foroton vt
price jona n
prick thiadyn vt
privative, PRIV m(A)-
English Index for Lexicon 191
probably -ra
property holholho n
pull, pull on dylhydyn vt
pull out jadan vt
pull out (harvest) dobadyn vt
pull weeds reken vt
punish ajalhodon vt
punishment ajalho n
push thirikhidin vt
put sikin vt
put in elevated position nykydan vt
quick kalyn, kaylyn vs
quick meran, miran vs
radio falhetho-bejoka n
radio falhetho-biraka n
rag bokolho-iban n
rain (oni)khin vi
rain oni n
rainy season oni kha tw
raise (grow, rear) bikhidin, bikhidan vt
rash (itchy rash) tetelio n
rat kolhi(-hi) n
raw ija vs
receive onabyn, othikhin vt
receive for free bykhyn vt
record player falhetho-bejoka n
red kolhen vs
reflexive -oa (-a after o)
reflexive -onoa
relate akakadyn vt
relativizer (WH.OBJ) -sia
relativizer (WH.SUBJ) -thi
relativizer (WH.SUBJ) -tho
remainder iban n
remember koborokoan vt
remind koborokoatyn vt
remove (take off) filoan vt
repair malhithin, malhitan vt
repay jontonoan, jontoan vi
report to onaban vt
reportative, REPORT tha p
request (ask) adakoton vd
request (beg, pray) khojabyn vt
require balhitan vt
192 English Index for Lexicon
steal thikebetoan vi
steam kolheli n
steel sipalhali n
stem of the cassava plant kanakydi n
stick ada n
still koan p
sting thydyn vt
stomach te(-hy), (y)te, dibejo(-ho) n
stomach (the organ) te-firo(-ho), (y)te-firo n
stone siba, kydyro n
stool hala n
stop khiadonoan vi
stop takyn, takan, takonoan vt, vi
story (y)dia(-hy) n
straighten misidin vt
strain (e.g. kasiri) sodan vt
stream malakydyn vi
street waboroko n
strength tata(-ha) n
stretchable dylhydan vs
string tetei n
take a stroll jadoan vi
strong tatan vs
study malhikhotoan vi
SUBJ relativizer [+male] -thi
SUBJ relativizer [–male] -tho
subordinate, SUB -n
be successful in the hunt kiwihin vi
suck soroton vt
suddenly abaren, baren adv
sugarcane sikalho n
sun hadali, adali n
Sunday sondakha n
support boratyn vt
Suriname river solhinama n
sweep (e.g. with a broom) syrybydyn, syrybydan vt
sweet semen vs
sweet bean tree kalhoto n
sweet cassava (no poison) bosoli n
sweet potato (dark purple) kharemero n
sweet potato (three kinds) halithi n
swim thimin vt
swing jodon vt
tail itoko(-ho) b
English Index for Lexicon 197
take nykyn vt
take along onakyn vt
take care of dykhyn…khona vi
take off (remove) filoan vt
take place balin vi
take to sikan vi
talk dian, ydian vi
tapir firobero, kama, katororo n
tasty semen vs
teach malhikhoton vt
teach (as a teacher) malhikhotan vt
teacher (profession) malhikhota-lhin n
teacher malhikhotathi n
tease jolhatyn…ansi vt
tease monekatan vt
tell akan vt
tell (e.g. a story) akakadyn vt
ten (two-my-hand) biandakhabo quant, num
tender belen vs
that (person, situation) kia n
that [+male, +human] lira, liraha, lirabo pro
that [–hum]/[–male +hum] tora, toraha, torabo pro
the [+human +plural] na art
the [+male, +human] li art
the [–hum]/[–male +hum] to art
their [+human] ne, n(A)- pro
their [–human] tho, n(A)- pro
them [–human] no, -n pro
them-BEN (abbr.) [+human] nan pp
them-BEN (abbr.) [–human] thon pp
then joaria, joaja tw
then kha, khana p
there jon n, vs
there where jontho rp
therefore kiadoma p
these [+human] naha pro
these [–human] toho pro
they [+human] naha pro
they [+human] nara, naraha, narabo pro
they [+human] ne, n(A)-, je pro
they [–human] no, -n pro
they [–human] tho, th(Y)- pro
they [–human] to, toho pro
they [–human] tora, toraha, torabo pro
198 English Index for Lexicon
thick firon vs
thick (e.g. thick skin) hananan vs
thief kathikebethi, kathikebetho n
thief kathikebero n
thin olhidan vs
thing (instrument) koana n
thing, THING (nominalizer) -koana(-ha), -bero
think koborokoatoan vi
thirsty alokosian vs
this moment wakharo, akharo tw
this [+male, +human] lihi pro
this [–hum]/[–male +hum] toho pro
those [+human] nara, naraha, narabo pro, adj.
those [–human] tora, toraha, torabo pro, adj.
though balhin p
threaten jadan vt
three kabyn quant, num
three times kabynibo
throw bolheidin, bolhiedan vt
throw (go around throwing) jokhan vi
throw away bolheidin, bolhiedan vt
thug malokonisiathi n
thusly (back-reference) khi adv
tie thobolhidin vt
tie (fasten) kyryn vt
tie off kyran vt
tied together kyronoan vi
tied up kyronoan vi
time khisiba n
time (a long time) waka
time (at the time) kha p
time (short time) wabydia
while (little while) siokhanin tw
times boren
tip si n
tip of (at the tip of) sin pp
tire dalhidi-koana-kothi(-hi) n
tire (fatigue) methedin vt
tired methen vs
tired (lack of strength) kholen vs
to bithi pp
to (abbrev. of ninro) -(n)ro
to (benefactive) myn pp
to the front of jaboaria pp
English Index for Lexicon 199
white halhiran vs
who alikan, halikan qw, rp
why (what is the purpose) amabia qw
why (what is the cause) amadoma qw
wide kabilokon vs
wife eretho, retho n
win motyn vt
wing kodibio-dyna n
wipe off rodyn vt
wisdom malhikho n
with khonaria pp
with (accompaniment) (o)ma, oma pp
with (followed by masc.) mathi conj
with (followed by non-masc.) matho conj
with (instrumental) abo pp
without m(A)-
without purpose osyron vs
woman hiaro, kakytho n
wood ada n
woodpecker hododi n
word (y)dia(-hy) n
work nekhebo n
work nekhebon vi
world holholho n
worry bokonoan vi
worth jona n
would -koma
wound ikolhidin vt
wound (i.e. get a burn) bitoan vi
wound (i.e. get a cut) bikhoan vi
wound (i.e. get chopped) sokonoan vi
wound (go around wounding) ikolhidan vi
be wounded with a cut lhykonoan vi
wrap kodikhithin vt
wrestle bolhedan vi
write bykhytyn vt
write kharasyn, kharasan vt
yawn erodoan vi
year hiwa, iwa n
yell simakan vi
yellow hehen vs
yes enhen p
yes (emphatic) hehe p
yesterday miaka tw
English Index for Lexicon 203
This story was written by Nelis M. Biswane, a resident of the Arawak village of
Cassipora, during a 1976 native authors’ workshop conducted by Naomi Glock and myself.
The author is a mother-tongue speaker of Arawak and was, at the time, approximately 50
years old and a grade school teacher in Cassipora.
204
The Bus Trip Story 205
Ken wa-sifoda-n-bia-the.
and we-turn.around-SUB-INCH-BACK
And we turned back.
This story was written by Nelis M. Biswane, a resident of the Arawak village of
Cassipora, during a 1976 native authors’ workshop conducted by Naomi Glock and myself.
The author is a mother-tongue speaker of Arawak and was, at the time, approximately 50
years old and a grade school teacher in Cassipora.
Bo-sokoa?”
you-be.cut
Did you chop yourself?”
By-simalha b-amyn-ka?
your-gun you-have-PERF
“Do you have your gun?
L-osa tho-khona.
he-go it-at
He shot at it.
W-osy-nbia dykhy-n.
we-go-INCH look-SUB
We went to look.
Okhokho!
oh.my
Oh my!
Ka-bokoto-koana saken-da no, ken kia khona-ria wa-nykyda-da no, w-osa th-abo.
ATTR-grab-THING exactly-EPEN it and that on-from we-lift-EPEN it we-go it-with.INSTR
It had something exactly like handles, and we lifted it up using those, and we went with
it (i.e. took it along).
Boemmm!!
boom
Boom!!
“Thomas!
Thomas
“Thomas!
Jara-ka bo?”
here-PERF you
Are you here?”
This narrative was recorded in the Arawak village of Powakka in 1974. The main narra-
tor was M. Makosi (M:), one of the oldest people in the village at that time and a well-
recognized story teller. At my request, the captain of the village, W. Ebesilio (E:), asked M.
Makosi to tell him something about hunting. The dialog below is a transcription of the re-
sulting tape recording, which another Arawak (N. Biswane) edited in order to remove some
of the hesitations and false starts.
E: De to na-balhosen-ka jaha.
I the their-leader-PERF here
I am their leader (i.e. village captain) here.
Firobero!
tapir
A tapir!
E: Kodibio?
bird
A bird?
Tho-moroda; th-osa.
it-fly it-go
It flew; it went.
E: B-eitho-ra-bo?
you-careful-EXPECT-CONT
You were careful, of course?
M: D-eitoa.
I-careful
I was careful.
E: Firobero likhin-da-n?
tapir owned.animal-EPEN-it
It is the tapir’s pet?
M: E! Kia rene!
exclamation that exactly
Exactly!
Bylhekoa!
lying
Lying there!
220 Appendix
Tho-loa-sibo da-khonaro-ka-the.
its-heart-front me-toward-PERF-BACK
Its chest was facing me.
E: By-dykha!
you-see
Imagine that!
Tho-khona to khota-ha!
it-at the animal-NEGEN
At it, the animal.
Firobero!
tapir
The tapir!
Paaiii!
Sound.of.shooting
Bang!
The Tapir Story 221
Da-tebeda tora-da!
I-touch that-EPEN
I hit it!
Tebeda-da-n!
touch-EPEN-it
Hit it!
Wolhorom!
SOUND.of.standing
Wororom!
Dimana!
stand.up
Stood up!
E: Thy-bianthewa?
its-second.one
The second barrel/shot?
M: Thy-bianthewa khi-da.
its-second.one thusly-EPEN
The second one the same way.
E: By-dykha!
you-see
Imagine that!
222 Appendix
Mmm, hmm!
exclamation exclamation
Mmm, hmm!
E: Kholebeta-ha?
cut.meat.into.pieces-FUT
Cut it up into pieces?
The Metamorphosis Story 223
M: Mani, da-kojo-fa!
no I-return-FUT
No, I went back!
E: Bo-kojo bahy-nro?
you-return house-TOWARD
You returned home?
M: Kojo-ra-ha bahy-nro-the…
return-EXPECT-FUT house-TOWARD-BACK
Returned home…
M: … onaky-n da-jono-wa.
fetch-SUB my-family-own
… fetching my family members.
E: Thaaa!
exclamation
Wow!
E: Halekhebe-n-da bo.
happy-SUB-EPEN you
You were happy.
This story was written by Thelma L. Cabolefodo, a resident of the Arawak village of
Powakka, during a 1976 native authors’ workshop conducted by Naomi Glock and myself.
The author is a mother-tongue speaker of Arawak and was, at the time, approximately 15
years old and a secondary-school student in Paramaribo, the capital of Suriname.
228
Bibliography 229
Hickerson, Nancy. 1991. “Una consideración sobre los términos de color en lokono.” Revista
Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüísticos 6:79–93.
Hopper, Paul L. 1979. “Aspect and foregrounding in discourse.” In Discourse and Syntax, pp.
213–241. Edited by Talmy Givon. New York: Academic Press.
Hopper, Paul L., ed. 1982. Tense Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jones, Larry B., and Jones, Linda K. 1984. “Verb morphology and discourse structure in
Mesoamerican languages.” In Theory and Application in Processing Texts in
Non-Indoeuropean Languages, pp.25–48. Edited by Robert E. Longacre. Hamburg: Helmut
Buske Verlag.
Labov, William, and Waletsky, Joshua. 1967. “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal
experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, pp. 12–44. Edited by June Helm. Se-
attle: University of Washington Press.
Lasnik, H. 1981. “Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study.” In Explorations in
Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Edited by Norbert Hornstein and
David Lightfoot. London: Longman.
Lewis, M. Paul, ed. 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, sixteenth edition. Dallas: SIL
International.
Li, Charles N.; Thompson, Sandra A.; and Thompson, R. McMillan. 1982. “The discourse
motivation for the perfect aspect: The Mandarin particle LE.” In Tense Aspect: Between
Semantics and Pragmatics, pp. 19–44. Edited by Paul L. Hopper. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Longacre, Robert E. 1976. An Anatomy of Speech Notions. Lisse: The Peter De Ridder Press.
Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
Longacre, Robert E., ed. 1984. Theory and Application in Processing Texts in Non-Indoeuropean
Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Lyons, John. (1968) Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Noble, G. Kingsley. 1965. Proto-Arawakan and Its Descendants. Bloomington: Indiana Univer-
sity Press.
Olsen, Fred. 1974. On the Trail of the Arawaks. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Payne, David L. 1991. “A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared
lexical retentions.” In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 3, 355–499, edited by
Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pet, Willem J. A. 1979, “Another look at Suriname Arawak phonology.” International Jour-
nal of American Linguistics 45:323–331.
Prince, Ellen. 1981. “Topicalization, focus-movement, and Yiddish-movement: A pragmatic
differentiation.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
7:249–64.
Propp, Vladimir. 1928. Morphology of the Folktale. Translated by Laurence Scott. (1958) In-
diana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, Publica-
tion 10, revised 1968. (Also American Folklore Society Bibliographical and Special
Series, Vol. 9, revised 1968.) (Paperback ed. 1984, Austin: University of Texas Press.)
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Free Press. (Also, Lon-
don: Collier-Macmillan.)
Renselaar, H. C. van, and Voorhoeve, J. 1962. “Rapport over een Ethnologische Studiereis
naar Mata.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 118:328–361. The Hague:
Martinus Nijhoff.
230 Bibliography
Ross, John. 1967. “Constraints on variables in syntax.” Ph.D dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Ruhlen, Merrit. 1975. A Guide to the Languages of the World. Stanford: Language Universals
Project, Stanford University.
Shultz, Theodore. 1850. The Acts of the Apostles, Translated into the Arawack Tongue. New
York: The American Bible Society. (Actually written 1802.)
Taylor, Douglas. 1957. “A note on some Arawakan words for man, etc.” International Jour-
nal of American Linguistics 23:46–48.
Taylor, Douglas. 1958a. “The place of Island Carib within the Arawakan family.” Interna-
tional Journal of American Linguistics 24:153–157.
Taylor, Douglas. 1958b. “Some problems of sound correspondence in Arawakan.” Interna-
tional Journal of American Linguistics 24:234–239.
Taylor, Douglas. 1969. “A preliminary view of Arawak phonology.” International Journal of
American Linguistics 35:234–238.
Taylor, Douglas. 1970a. “Arawak grammatical categories and translation.” International
Journal of American Linguistics 36:199–204.
Taylor, Douglas. 1970b. “The postpositions of Arawak.” International Journal of American
Linguistics 36:31–37.
Taylor, Douglas. 1976. “The nominal plural in Arawak.” International Journal of American
Linguistics 42:371–374.
Taylor, Douglas. 1977. Languages of the West Indies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Taylor, Douglas, and Hoff, Berend. 1966. Review of Proto-Arawakan and Its Descendants, by
G. Kingsley Noble. International Journal of American Linguistics 32:303–308.
Walrod, Michael R. 1984. “Grammatical features of peak in Ga’dang narrative.” In Theory
and Application in Processing Texts in Non-Indoeuropean Languages, pp. 93–112. Edited by
Robert E. Longacre. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.