Perception of Students in The Transitioning From Modular To Face To Face Classes
Perception of Students in The Transitioning From Modular To Face To Face Classes
Perception of Students in The Transitioning From Modular To Face To Face Classes
The effect of COVID-19 to the Philippines have caused major adjustments and
dilemma to a lot of Filipinos. The students are one of the most affected
sections of our society, as they must deal to the sudden change or transition
to our education system implemented by the government. As stated by Xhafa
(2021) students biggest challenge in the COVID-19 situation was to adopt to
the unforeseen transition of the education system and the implementation of
the online/distance learning program.
The process of transition made the quality of education inadequate, and the
materials provided by the government was not applicable to all Filipino
students. The online learning program requires a systematic way of planning
and assessing the situation and consideration to the factors that might affect
the students, such as, slow internet connection, the availability of gadgets and
the quality of education that they will get despite the situation.
As a result of the analyzed data by Xhafa (2021), 13% of the students were
having difficulties with the online/distance learning program, while 87% of the
students’ population agreed that they have high level of digital mastery and
were able to perform and attend with their school online activities.
Another online education barrier is the slow internet connection and technical
difficulties, which plays a big role in the online/distance education program.
In accordance with BMC medical education (2020), Most of the students’
population have reasoned that the technical difficulties and slow internet
connectivity have affected their behavioral and attitude towards studying
during the pandemic.
The analysis of IJIACSA (2020) revealed that students disclose four main
factors of difficulties with online learning faced by students. Technical issues
(Ph. 1, 38.67%; Ph. 2, 47.13%; Ph. 3, 30.36%, and self-attitude (Ph. 1,
33.15%; Ph. 2, 31.03%; Ph. 3, 58.93%) contributed as the biggest factor in the
learners’ absence from online learning. Most of the students confessed that
technical issues such as Internet connection caused them to fail in completing
online activities and assessments.
VARIABLES:
According to the study conducted by Sarah Ferguson (2020), the final grades
of the students who enrolled to the online/distance learning program was
assessed and shows that in the face -to- face learning program, among the 28
students there are 5 students who withdrew to the pre-calculus courses
resulting to 17.9% of attrition rate. While there are 23 students enrolled to the
online pre-calculus course, 4 students have withdrew resulting to 17.4% of
attrition rate. This shows the academic performance of the students enrolled
to both different learning program during the pandemic.
Another data conducted by (Hafeez, Ajmal & Zulfiqar; 2021) postgraduate
students’ academic achievement was assessed to investigate the difference
between the face-to-face and online learning program. The mean result of the
academic achievement of students in 1st semester of online learning program
in 3.32 while the mean for the face-to-face program of 2 nd semester is 3.26.
This outcome shows that there is a really no significant difference between the
two learnings’ program, over all it shows that the postgraduates students
perform well and has better result in the online learning program.
RESEARCH GAP:
4. What are the general comments about the sudden transition of Modular
Learning to Face-to-Face classes?