Standard

Pedro Average Deviation

Jump
height(in Coefficient
15 inches) 19 18 0.25 of Variation

No. of
Jumping
Jack per Jump in
minute 85 70 25 height

50 m sprint
time
(inseconds) 10 14 0.8
Conclusion: Comparing the relative variations of exercises of Pedro, it can be seen t
16 Given: mean: 104 a. z-score of 84 z-score of 112
Standard Deviation = 16 z-score = (84 −104)/16 = (112 −104)/16
z-score = (𝑥 − 𝜇)/𝜎

=−1.25 =0.5
A B
17
Highest 98 77 A B
Lowest 42 36 Range 56 41
1. False: because the range of Block A is 56 higher than range of Block
First Quartile 53 45 Interquartile Q3 - Q1
Second Quartile 81 64 36 27
Third Quartile 89 72 2. False: because the IQR of A is 36 which is higher than IQR of B havin
3. False: because all the scores in A is higher than the scores in B.
4

4 2
5 42
6 7 67
78 8 78
82 4 6 78
91 4 9 82
84
86
91
94
 99 80.1

18 a. Mean deviation result is 80.1 higher than 16.18 standard deviation

b. Quartile 1 78
Quartile 2 83
Quartile 3 89.75
Quartile 4 99
c.

Part 2
7
a. There is significant difference between the proportion of voters in district A and proportion of of voters in district
b. p - value is 2.33 using critical values of Z-test.
Conclusion: Thus, z-value is 1.7586 is less than p-value 2.33, therefore, ACCEPT the Ho. There I no significant differen
8
a. Ho: There is no significant difference between attending lecture sessions and online sessions in achievement as m
Ha: There is a significant difference between attending lecture sessions and online sessions in achievement as masu
b. value of test statistic = 1.6178 degrees of freedom (df) = 15 p-values

c. Since the p-values (0.063268, 0.126535) respectivly and greater than 0.05, therefore, Reject the null hypothesis (
9
a. Ho: there is no sufficient evidence that the mean velocity is faster than 6 seconds
Ha: There is a sufficient evidence that the mean velocity is faster than 6 seconds.
b. Value of statistic = 2.30 degree of freedom = n - 1 = 69 - 1 = 68 p-values

c. Since the p-value (1.2941,1.6676) respectively and greater than 0.05, therefore, Reject the null hypothesis (Ho). T

10

District 2016 2017

Bay 95 93 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming

Charlotte 94 95
Hendry 57 78
Monroe 91 98 Mean
Orange 82 83 Variance
Observations
Pooled Varia
Hypothesized
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-ta
t Critical one-
P(T<=t) two-ta
t Critical two-

2016 2017
1. Mean 83.8 89.4
STDV 15.83 8.5

2. Ho: There is no significant improvement in achievement scores for Grades 4-8 at the end of the course.
Ha: There is a significant improvement in achievement scores for Grades 4-8 at the end of the course.

3. t - Stat = -0.6967416
df= 8
p-values One-tailed Two-tailed
0.25285095 0.50570189

4. Since the p-values are (0.2529, 0.5057) is greater that 0.05, therefore Reject the null hypothesis (Ho). Hence, ther

Part 3
1 Ho: There is no significant difference in the variation of listening for men and women.
Ha: There is a significant difference in the variation of listening for men and women.
Test-statistic t = 0
df 10 + 12 - 2 20
p-value one-tailed two-tailed
1.325 1.725
Conclusion
Since the computed value or t value is 0 less than the tabular value 1.325, therefore, accept the n
2 Ho: There is no significant differences between the scores of students using different te
Ha: There is a significant differences between the scores of students using different tea
Test-statistic 4.11440509
df between grouwithin groups
3 15
p-value 0.02574962

Conclusion
Since the p-value is (0.02574962) is less than 0.05, therefore Accept the null hypothesis (Ho). He

3 Ho: There is no significant differences between the scores post test and final exam of st
Ha: There is a significant differences between the scores post test and final exam of stu
Test-statistic 0.74627189
df regression residual
1 18
p-value 4.19043E-05 Intercept
9.20498E-07 Final Exam

Conclusion
Since the p value (9.20498E-07) is less than 0.05, therefore, there is accept the null hypothesis (H
 4
Year x1 x2 x3 x4
API Score in 2010 745 71 89 1.7 4
808 18 51 2.91 16
798 24 79 2.21 10
791 50 76 2.19 5
854 17 56 2.84 7
688 71 27 1.7 6
801 11 39 2.79 7
 751 57 87 1.72 1
778 34 81 2.14 6
846 9 31 3.22 22
690 57 78 2.14 3
685 77 28 1.46 8
API score in 2009 705 71 89 1.7 4
809 18 51 2.91 16
763 24 79 2.21 10
786 50 76 2.19 5
839 17 56 2.84 7
673 71 27 1.7 6
804 11 39 2.79 7
750 57 87 1.72 1
770 34 81 2.14 6
841 9 31 3.22 22
706 57 78 2.14 3
665 77 28 1.46 8

Results:
if the p-value is 0.05 or lower, the result is trumpeted as significant, but if it is highe

1. For the sample or API score in years or between 2009 and 2010 having a result of p value (0.7
2. For the columns from x1 to x4 having a result of of p value (6.8434E-109) and it is less than 0.0
3. For the interaction between variables, the result of p value is (0.970048114) and it is greater
 = 𝑠/𝑥 𝑥100%
Where: s = standard deviation, x = mean

= 18/0.25 𝑥100% = 70/25 𝑥100%

Number of
Jumping jack

=7200 =280

es of Pedro, it can be seen that the 50 m sprint have the higher coefficient of variation. Thus, 50 m sprint (in seconds are more
core of 112
(112 −104)/16 −1.25=3944
0.5=0.1915
=.5859 𝑥 100%
=58.59%
Thus, the percentage of students expected to get a score between 84 and 112 is 58.59%.

6 higher than range of Block B having result of 41 only.

s higher than IQR of B having the result of 27 only.

er than the scores in B.
 Mean
16.1757706 STDV
Quartile 1 78
Quartile 2 83
Quartile 3 89.75
Quartile 4 99

ortion of of voters in district B. z - value = 1.7586

here I no significant difference between the proportion of voters in district A and proportion of of voters in district B.

essions in achievement as masured by the final exam for the course.

ons in achievement as masured by the final exam for the course.
one-tailed two-tailed
0.063268 0.126535
Reject the null hypothesis (Ho). Hence, there is a significant difference between attending lecture sessions and online sessions

one-tailed two-tailed
1.2941 1.6676

t the null hypothesis (Ho). Thus, there is a sufficient evidence that the mean velocity is faster that 6 seconds.

11

Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

 2016 2017
83.8 89.4
250.7 72.3
5 5
161.5
0
8
-0.69674164
0.25285095
1.85954804
0.50570189
2.30600414

nd of the course.
of the course.

ypothesis (Ho). Hence, there is a significant improvement in achievement scores for Grade 4-8 at the end of the course.

ning for men and women.

ing for men and women. (35 −35)/√([((10−1) 1
t(35
= −35)/√([((𝑛1−1) 〖𝑠 1 〗 ^2+(𝑛2−1) 〖𝑠 t= 12^2)/(10+12 −2)][(1
2 〗 ^2)/(𝑛1+𝑛2 −2)][(𝑛1+𝑛2)/𝑛1𝑛2])

.325, therefore, accept the null hypoyhesis (Ho). Hence, there is no significant difference in the variation of listening for men an
f students using different teaching methods.
students using different teaching methods.

A B C
112 129 140
92 102 121
89 136 130
97 99 116
104 111

he null hypothesis (Ho). Hence, there is no significant differences between scores of students using different teaching method.

Student Posttest Final Exam

ost test and final exam of students. 1 100 98
st test and final exam of students. 2 96 97
3 88 88
4 100 100
5 100 100
6 96 78
7 80 68
8 68 47
9 92 90
10 96 94
11 88 84
12 92 83
ccept the null hypothesis (Ho). Hence, there is no significant d 13 68 57
14 84 84
15 84 81
16 88 83
17 72 84
18 88 93
19 72 57
20 88 83
nificant, but if it is higher than 0.05, the result is non-significant

ving a result of p value (0.7162) and it is greater than 0.05. Thus, it is statistically no significant or no difference between the s
E-109) and it is less than 0.05. Thus, it has a statistically significant or there is a difference between variables.
70048114) and it is greater than 0.05. Thus, it is statisticall no significant or no differences between the interaction of variables

Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY x1 x2 x3
API Score in 2010
Count 12 12 12 12
Sum 9235 496 722 27.02
 Average 769.583333 41.3333333 60.1666667 2.25166667
Variance 3441.7197 641.333333 585.787879 0.32323333

API score in 2009

Count 12 12 12 12
Sum 9111 496 722 27.02
Average 759.25 41.3333333 60.1666667 2.25166667
Variance 3686.56818 641.333333 585.787879 0.32323333

Total
Count 24 24 24 24
Sum 18346 992 1444 54.04
Average 764.416667 41.3333333 60.1666667 2.25166667
Variance 3437.03623 613.449275 560.318841 0.30917971

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
Sample 128.133333 1 128.133333 0.13276718
Columns 10469377.7 4 2617344.42 2711.99866
Interaction 512.533333 4 128.133333 0.13276718
Within 106160.778 110 965.09798

Total 10576179.1 119

70/25 𝑥100%
= 14/0.8 𝑥100%
50 m sprint

=1750

50 m sprint (in seconds are more varied.

b. Given 10%=0.1
z-table 0.1 is z-score = 0.398
z-score = (𝑥 − 𝜇)/𝜎

0.398 = (𝑥
4 and 112 is 58.59%. −104)/16
𝑥=110.37 ~ 110
Thus, the score of the student in order to receive an award is 110.
 Final Exam Residual Pl
15
10 Final Exam Lin
5

Residuals
0 120
-5 40 50100 60 70 80
-10 80

Posttest
-15 60
-20 40
20
0 Final Exam
40 50 60 70 80
Final Exam

of of voters in district B.

ture sessions and online sessions in achievement as measure by the final exam for the course.

that 6 seconds.

Given Mean 75878

Standard
Deviation 4000
Sample (N) 60

95%
confidence
interval 1.96
 Formula =𝑥 ±𝑧^∗ (𝜎/√𝑛) Where x = mean
z = critical value of z
𝜎=𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
n = sample size

a. =𝑥 ±𝑧^∗ (𝜎/√𝑛)

=75878 ±1.96(4000/60)

𝐹𝑖𝑟𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙=75 747.33

S𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙=76 008.67

Thus, repeated samples of 60 professors from the population, it is 95% confident that the true populati

8 at the end of the course.

(35 −35)/√([((10−1) 10^2+(12−1)

12^2)/(10+12 −2)][(10+12)/((10)(12))]) t=0

e variation of listening for men and women.

 D
101 Anova: Single Factor
116
105 SUMMARY
126 Groups Count Sum Average
119 A 5 494 98.8
B 5 577 115.4
C 4 507 126.75
using different teaching method. D 5 567 113.4

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS
Between Groups 1793.83947 3 597.946491
Within Groups 2179.95 15 145.33

Total 3973.78947 18

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.863870297377119
R Square 0.746271890690433
Adjusted R S 0.732175884617679
Standard Erro 5.36770308537168
Observations 20

ANOVA
df SS MS F
Regression 1 1525.37974 1525.37974 52.9420807
Residual 18 518.620255 28.8122364
Total 19 2044

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value

Intercept 37.269845812614 6.93928691 5.37084664 4.19043E-05
Final Exam 0.60315529639037 0.08289506 7.27613089 9.20498E-07

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation Predicted Posttest Residuals Percentile

1 96.3790648588702 3.62093514 2.5
2 95.7759095624799 0.22409044 7.5
3 90.3475118949666 -2.34751189 12.5
4 97.585375451651 2.41462455 17.5
5 97.585375451651 2.41462455 22.5
6 84.3159589310629 11.6840411 27.5
7 78.2844059671592 1.71559403 32.5
8 65.6181447429614 2.38185526 37.5
9 91.5538224877473 0.44617751 42.5
10 93.9664436733088 2.03355633 47.5
11 87.9348907094051 0.06510929 52.5
12 87.3317354130147 4.66826459 57.5
13 71.6496977068651 -3.64969771 62.5
14 87.9348907094051 -3.93489071 67.5
15 86.125424820234 -2.12542482 72.5
16 87.3317354130147 0.66826459 77.5
17 87.9348907094051 -15.9348907 82.5
18 93.3632883769184 -5.36328838 87.5
19 71.6496977068651 0.35030229 92.5
20 87.3317354130147 0.66826459 97.5

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.863870297377119
R Square 0.746271890690433
Adjusted R S 0.732175884617679
Standard Erro 5.36770308537168
Observations 20

ANOVA
df SS MS F
Regression 1 1525.37974 1525.37974 52.9420807
Residual 18 518.620255 28.8122364
Total 19 2044

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value

Intercept 37.269845812614 6.93928691 5.37084664 4.19043E-05
Final Exam 0.60315529639037 0.08289506 7.27613089 9.20498E-07

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

Observation Predicted Posttest ResidualsStandard Residuals

1 96.3790648588702 3.62093514 0.69306315
2 95.7759095624799 0.22409044 0.04289191
3 90.3475118949666 -2.34751189 -0.44932426
4 97.585375451651 2.41462455 0.46216992
5 97.585375451651 2.41462455 0.46216992
6 84.3159589310629 11.6840411 2.23637762
7 78.2844059671592 1.71559403 0.32837236
8 65.6181447429614 2.38185526 0.45589773
9 91.5538224877473 0.44617751 0.08540037
10 93.9664436733088 2.03355633 0.38923176
11 87.9348907094051 0.06510929 0.01246221
12 87.3317354130147 4.66826459 0.89352668
13 71.6496977068651 -3.64969771 -0.69856843
14 87.9348907094051 -3.93489071 -0.75315565
15 86.125424820234 -2.12542482 -0.4068158
16 87.3317354130147 0.66826459 0.12790883
17 87.9348907094051 -15.9348907 -3.05000922
18 93.3632883769184 -5.36328838 -1.02655734
19 71.6496977068651 0.35030229 0.06704942
20 87.3317354130147 0.66826459 0.12790883
nt or no difference between the samples or group.
ween variables.
tween the interaction of variables.

x4 Total

12 60
95 10575.02
7.91666667 176.250333
33.9015152 90843.044

12 60
95 10451.02
7.91666667 174.183667
33.9015152 88412.0578

24
190
7.91666667
32.4275362

P-value F crit
0.71627952 3.92739363
6.8434E-109 2.45421339
0.97004811 2.45421339
c. Given 76 and below
z-score = (𝑥 − 𝜇)/𝜎

= (76 −104)/16

𝑥=−1.75
z-score table 𝑥=−1.75 is 0.4599

0.4599 + .5 =.9599
.9599 𝑥 100%=95.99
2000 𝑥 .9599=1919.8 𝑜𝑟 1920
Thus, there are 1920 students in a cohort of 2000 sixth-grade expected to get scores of 7

Final Ex
15Final Exam Line
10
120 5
siduals

100 0
80 -5 40 50 60
t
 Final Ex
15Final Exam Line
xam Residual Plot 10
Normal 50Probability Plot
120

Residuals
100
Final Exam Line Fit Plot 120 80 -5 40 50 60

Posttest
100 60 -10
80 40 -15
0 70 80 90 100 110 20

Posttest
60 -20
Posttest 40 0
Predicted Posttest 20 40 50 60 70 80 9
0 Final Exam
Final Exam 0 20 40 60 80
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Sample Percentile
Final Exam
dent that the true population mean is contained between 75 747.33 and 76 008.67 dollars
 Variance
86.7
269.3
111.583333
105.3

F P-value F crit
4.11440509 0.02574962 3.2873821

Significance F
9.20498E-07

Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%

22.690945 51.8487466 22.690945 51.8487466
 0.42899924 0.77731135 0.42899924 0.77731135

OBABILITY OUTPUT

Posttest
68
68
72
72
80
84
84
88
88
88
88
88
92
92
96
96
96
100
100
100

Significance F
9.20498E-07
Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
22.690945 51.8487466 22.690945 51.8487466
0.42899924 0.77731135 0.42899924 0.77731135
grade expected to get scores of 76 and below.

Final Exam Residual Plot

15Final Exam Line Fit Plot
10
5
siduals

0
-5 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
 Final Exam Residual Plot
15Final Exam Line Fit Plot
10
ormal 50Probability Plot
Residuals

-5 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
-10 Posttest
-15 Predicted Posttest
-20
Final Exam
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Final Exam
40 60 80 100 120
Sample Percentile