Internship Report MBA (Main Body)
Internship Report MBA (Main Body)
Introduction
Page 1 of 32
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The objectives of the report are classified in two types. These are as follows:
Broad objective: To investigate and analyze the financial performance, challenges and strategies
during COVID situation of Sonali Bank Limited (SBL).
Specific objectives: Besides the broad objective, the study has some relative objectives. These
are as follows:
To examine the financial performance gap between normal and COVID situation.
To evaluate the level of challenges those have been faced by SBL during COVID
situation.
To explore knowledge about the implications of strategies to enhance performance and to
cope up with COVID and post COVID situation.
To recommend some suggestions and strategies so that problems can be minimized and
the level of performance can be improved in the motive to build positive perception
among the customers and to create competitive edge in the market.
Through literature review I have got some theoretical framework regarding financial
performance, challenges and strategies. These theories help me to make the report informative
and practical. By comparing the collected information with the theoretical dimension I draw
conclusion on my entitled topic.
Page 2 of 32
1.5 Significance of the Study
The banking sector has experienced a very critical situation because of COVID-19 in previous
two years. The time period 2020 and half of 2021 were alarming for the world and banking
sector as well. Due to this threat, almost all banks financial performance is downtrends. Now
they are trying to recover the situations by undertaking strategies.
In this present age, the dimension of banking has been changing rapidly due to deregulation,
technological innovation and globalization. Bangladesh is not out of the race. Now banks must
compete in the market place both with local institutions as well as foreign ones. A large number
of banks offer a wide range of services in different flavor on the basis of situational demand.
SBL is one of the largest and oldest state owned commercial bank in Bangladesh. It has a vast
number of customers. But it has been struggling since 2020-21 because of COVID-19. Here my
intention is to analyze the financial performance and challenges it faced during COVID situation
and strategies have been taken to cope up with the challenges.
The primary limitation of the study was to conduct a small scale survey on employees
due to time and monetary constraints.
Employees’ answers are not always rational to reflect the real situation because their
views varied from individual to individual.
SBL has no sufficient information in their website to fulfill the report's requirement.
Relevant data and document collection were difficult due to the organization
confidentiality.
Many respondents were hesitant and reluctant to answer certain issues on survey
quewstions.
Page 3 of 32
CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY
Collection of Data
Page 4 of 32
2.2 Sources of Information
Both primary and secondary data have been used to prepare this report. The sources are
mentioned below by name:
The initial information is collected through interviews with employees and clients of Sonali
Bank Ltd. Mainly I have conducted a questionnaire survey on the employees of SBL from
various levels. I designed a structured questionnaire for the survey.
To make the report informative and representative I also used secondary data source. Secondary
data have been collected for this study from the following areas:
I have collected information from three strata. In total I took 15 respondents from various
employment areas as per sample size to collect and analyze data.
Page 5 of 32
2.4.1 Distribution of Sample
Table 2.2: Showing the respondents staying time period (employment status) in the bank
Intervals (year) No. of respondents Percentage
00-01 03 20.00%
01-05 08 53.33%
05+ 04 26.67%
Total 15 100.00%
Interpretation: Here also the respondents staying period are also collected to ensure the
accurate feedback from the respondents. Here the number if medium term respondents are 8 that
are 53.33% of the total respondents. Entry level respondents are 20% of the total number and the
long term staying respondents are 26.67% of total respondents that represents a perfect mix of
the respondents to make the report valid and reliable.
Page 6 of 32
Table 2.3: Showing the opinion on the actively involved in core banking activities
Particulars No. of respondents Percentage
Assistant General Manager 01 06.67%
Senior Officer 04 26.67%
Officer General 04 26.67%
Officer Cash 06 40.00%
Others 00 00.00%
Total 15 100.00%
Interpretation: To cover up the strata employees in varies areas have been included in the
study. AGM, senior office, officer general and cash officer gave their opinion here to explore the
real figure of the analysis. Here only one AGM gives opinion. The number of senior officer and
officer general are same in number. It is 4 out of 15 that cover 26.67% of the total respondents.
The respondents of re cash officer are 40% of the total respondents. Lastly the activity of the
respondents is also collected to unfold the accurate picture of the organization. Here 100% of the
respondents are actively involved in core banking activities of the bank that is really needed for
the study. So, the sample selection and data collection are totally fine and representative over
here.
E = acceptable magnitude of error, plus or minus error factor (range in one-half of the
total confidence interval)
Page 7 of 32
2.6 Questionnaire Design
As per popular tool of collecting data I prepared questionnaire to record feedback from the
employees of SBL. The questionnaire contained some identical questions to check the validity of
the questionnaire. To collect the data regarding performance, challenges and strategies I used
five scale rating to evaluate highly challenging to poorly challenging. Here I covered entire
banking related factors. This structured questionnaire was the major tool of collecting data of this
research project.
Page 8 of 32
2.9 Variables
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the banking performance, challenges and strategies of
SBL in COVID situation. So, here the dependent variables are level of challenges and
effectiveness of strategies. Besides independent variables are the related factors of banking.
These are as follows:
Dependent Variable Independent Variable
Lack of modern and hi-tech equipment
Page 9 of 32
Chapter 3
Literature Review
Goel, Sharma and Mani (2012) investigated the performance related characteristics of the
organizations. For the purpose of performance evaluation, risk adjusted performance, asset size
and expense ratio of the financial statement have been studied for past five years. Results have
confirmed the presence of performance persistence in funds. This study has contributed towards
existing knowledge for the relationship between financial performance and their characteristics.
Agrawal & Patidar (2009) studied the empirically testing on the basis of financial performance
and analyzing data at the fund manager and fund investor levels. The study revealed that the
performance is affected by the saving and an investment habit of the people and at the second
side the confidence and loyalty of the fund Manager and rewards affects the performance.
Dhanda, Batra and Anjum (2012) attempted to study the performance evaluation of selected open
ended schemes in terms of risk and return relationship. For this study, rate of return method,
mean, Standard Deviation has been used.
Sapar and Madava (2003) conducted a research on the performance evaluation of financial
institutions in a market. The results of performance measures suggest that most of the financial
schemes in the sample of 58 were able to satisfy investor's expectations by giving excess returns
over expected returns based on both premium for systematic risk and total risk.
Customer satisfaction has a positive correlation between top quality performance and customer
feedback on improving the features of services. Gerson (1995) shows that customers satisfaction
needs critical skill regarding recognize, reward, reinforce top quality performance and close the
gap between expectations and performance. He also argues that there is no way to avoid the
Page 10 of 32
importance of satisfying customers. So, every organization needs to follow the customer
feedback to improve service quality in order to make customer satisfied and attain profitability.
Dimitriades (2008) argues that positive financial performance has been a major goal for business
organizations for many years and that loyal customers contribute to the company‘s profitability
by spending more on the company‘s products and services, but warn that one should distinguish
between customer satisfaction with services and goods as they may be influenced by different
factors. Sometimes the satisfaction regarding service is so much intangible that it is heard to
measures. So organizations need to set strategy by considering the requirement of the market and
changing situation.
Financial performance is a subjective measure of how well a firm can use assets from its primary
mode of business and generate revenues. The term is also used as a general measure of a firm's
overall financial health over a given period.
A company's financial performance tells investors about its general well-being. It's a snapshot
of its economic health and the job its management is doing—providing insight into the future:
whether its operations and profits are on track to grow, and the outlook for its stock.
Financial Statement
Financial statements are written records that convey the business activities and the financial
performance of a company. Financial statements are often audited by government agencies,
accountants, firms, etc. to ensure accuracy and for tax, financing, or investing purposes.
Financial statements include: Balance sheet and income statement.
Page 11 of 32
Financial Performance Analysis
Financial analysis refers to the process of studying and assessing a company’s financial
statements—a collection of data and figures organized according to recognized accounting
principles. The aim is to understand the company's business model, the profitability (or loss) of
its operations, and how it's spending, investing, and generally using its money—summarizing the
company by the numbers, so to speak.
Organizational Strategies
Organization strategies are the sum of actions that organization takes to attain long term goal. As
per the company’s strategic plan different actions are taken up to cope up with the challenges.
During Covid situation every organization especially banks have faced difficulties and
challenges to retain the employees for the consequences of the capital shortfall and slip of
operating profit. To survive in the market organizations took numurious strategies like cost
cutting, firing employees or alternative recruitment, technological innivaton and digiallization.
These all are the organization strategy arise from a company's mission, which explains why a
company is in business.
Page 12 of 32
Chapter 4
Organization Overview
The bank has been converted to a Public Limited Company with 100% ownership of the
government and started functioning as Sonali Bank Limited from November 15, 2007 taking
over all assets, liabilities and business of Sonali Bank. After corporatization, the management of
the bank has been given required autonomy to make the bank competitive & to run its business
effectively.
Page 13 of 32
The details corporate profile of SBL is as follows:
Website : www.sonalibank.com.bd
E-mail : [email protected]
Page 14 of 32
4.3 Organogram of Sonali Bank Limited
Sonali Bank Ltd. has the vast functional activities to serve a wide range of services to the large
number of customers. It has corporate head office and regional office to make the services
available to the customers. To conduct the whole functional activities it follows the following
management hierarchy:
Mission
Dedicated to extend a whole range of quality products that support divergent needs of people
aiming at enriching their lives, creating value for the stakeholders and contributing towards
socio-economic development of the country.
Slogan
Page 15 of 32
4.5 Objectives of Sonali Bank Ltd.
Sonali Bank Limited has its prosperous past, glorious present, prospective future and under
processing projects and activities. It is conducted by focusing mainly on the following
objectives:
To provide all types of banking services at the door steps of the clients.
To participate in various social and development programs.
To take part in implementation of various policies and promises made by the government.
Services of SBL
Acillary Online
Locker Accounts ATM service
services services
Page 16 of 32
4.7 Target Clients of Sonali Bank Ltd.
SBL offers a wide range of services to target a large number of customers segments. Through
1224 branches it provides services almost all over the Bangladesh. So, the key target customers
are:
Government job holders
Government organization
Corporate bodies
Educational institutions
Students
Business persons
Households and so forth.
Page 17 of 32
Chapter 5
Analysis and Findings
This chapter is all about analyzing the financial performance of SBL for the last five years to
draw a conclusion about the performance in Covid situation along with the findings getting
through the opinion of the employees who have legal entity in SBL. These two phases are
discussed consecutively. In the year 2020-21, the world experienced a new crisis that is Covid.
All the sectors are affected highly because of this pandemic. As banking is a key sector in
modern economy and Sonali Bank is the key government owned commercial Bank in
Bangladesh, here the volatility of this organization is explored.
Page 18 of 32
Table 5.2: Summary of operating results during COVID and Pre-COVID situation
Page 19 of 32
Table 5.3: Significant profitability ratios in COVID and pre-COVID situation
Amount (%)
Particulars Change Amount (%)
2020-21 2019-20
Return on Investment (ROI) 7.13 5.98 1.15
Non-interest income to total income 62.65 53.19 9.46
Cost income ratio 74.6 74.13 0.47
Profit after tax to total income 4.21 3.53 0.68
Return on assets (ROA) 0.21 0.2 0.01
Return on equity (ROE) 4.21 3.92 0.29
Interpretations: In the question of profitability ratios, SBL showed its class during Pandemic
situation. Here return on investment was increased by 1.15% in comparing to the previous years
that is quite vital for the organization. The amount of non-interest income was also positive for
SBL and it was about 9.46% changed in the pandemic situation. But return on assets was
remained unchanged here due to underutilization of the assets. Return on equity and cost income
ratio remained moderate in comparing two years. More improvement was expected over here.
Table 5.4: Summary of Balance Sheet (Key Issues) Of SBL for the last five years
Particulars Tk. In Million
2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
Cash in Hand 7300 7691 5017 5113 6289
Current Assets 522001 499062 422591 438880 388392
Balance With Bangladesh Bank and 83801 101073 93111 82883 73793
its Agent Bank
Balance With Other Banks and FI's 52308 87161 107494 68568 38820
Investments 29691 500387 440921 462577 468881
Loans and Advances 586232 551026 464166 423218 384538
Fixed Assets 33891 33466 33377 33307 33113
Other Assets 188976 175523 143033 142101 191566
Current Liabilities 275643 266687 268138 262856 265545
Page 20 of 32
Long Term Liabilities 1315590 1137722 968567 917768 867670
Paid up Capital 45300 45300 45300 41300 38300
Reserve Fund and Surplus 48998 22893 24837 24787 29075
Interpretations: The balance sheet of SBL was not balanced enough during Covid situation. In
some extent it was very alarming like cash in hand. In comparing to the year 2019-20 it was
negative but the total current assets was increased in the situation. Balance with Bangladesh
Bank and agent banking was also decreased during the situation that is considerable issue in the
modern banking era. Balance with other bank and financial institutions were also decreased
along with the amount of investments. Loan and advances also increased that indicates during
the year and it was in increasing trend for the last five years. The liabilities section of the balance
sheet showed the same sign during the situation. It was also in increasing trend. But the
organization experienced a huge change in the reserve and surplus section in comparing to the
pre-Covid situation.
Table 5.5: Overall position of the general credit of SBL during COVID and pre-COVID
situation
Page 21 of 32
Table 5.6: Showing the key ratios on the basis of financial performance
Particulars 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
Operating Profit Ratio 25.39% 22.26% 25.86% 16.08% 5.99%
Return of Assets (ROA) 0.21% 0.20% 0.18% 0.58% 0.14%
Return of Equity (ROE) 4.21% 3.92% 3.32% 10.63% 2.18%
Return on Investment (ROI) 7.13% 5.98% 7.58% 7.29% 7.06%
Return on Loan and Advance 5.57% 5.51% 5.74% 6.85% 7.14%
Return on Capital Employed 1.64% 1.42% 0.22% 1.22% 0.45%
Return on Earning Assets 0.27% 0.25% 0.24% 0.85% 0.19%
Operating Profit per Employee 1.14 0.87 1.17 0.65 0.21
Net Profit per Employee 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.39 0.08
Operating Profit per Branch 17.56 13.99 16.67 9.87 3.52
Efficiency Ratio 25.18% 25.55% 24.33% 26.22% 27.30%
Burden Ratio 0.56% 0.50% 0.60% 0.56% 0.93%
Cost of Deposit 3.32% 3.55% 3.61% 4.09% 4.84%
Yields on Loans and Advances 5.57% 5.51 5.74% 6.85% 7.14%
Interest Spread 1.1% 1.96% 2.13% 2.76% 2.30%
Cost of Fund 5.23% 5.29% 5.38% 5.95% 6.95%
Cost to Income Ratio 74.61 77.74% 74.13% 83.92% 94.01%
Debt Equity Ratio (Times) 17.58 20.59 17.63 18.02 16.82
Current Ratio (Times) 1.89 1.87 1.58 1.67 1.46
Net Asset Value per Share 189.00 150.54 154.83 160.02 175.91
(NAVPS-in TK.)
Earnings per Share (EPS- In TK.) 7.14 5.98 5.47 18.50 3.96
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) 10.02% 10.09 10.10% 10.35% 10.33%
Cash Reserve Ratio / Liquidity 13% 7.90% 7.30% 8.08% 7.22%
Ratio (CRR)
Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) 50.02% 41.57% 38.27% 44.13% 48.50%
Page 22 of 32
Interpretations: Ratio analysis is the key tools to highlight the financial performance of any
organization and evaluate the performance gap. In this table all ratios are encoded to analyze the
performance level of SBL during Covid situation in comparing to the previous four years
performance. Here operating profit ratio showed gradual up gradation and that was consistent in
Covid situation also. Return on assets was also same to the previous year’s especially same to
2019-20 but little bit handsome comparing to the rest of the values. Return on equity and return
on investment were also in positive trend. Return on loan and advancement showed consistent
value in comparing to the all five years.
Return on capital employed and return on earning assets was in the gradual up gradation trend
for the last five years along with Covid situation. Per employee operating was increased
remarkably and surprisingly during the Covid situation. Here operating profit increased very
rapidly but net profit per employee was almost static considering the previous years. Branch wise
operating profits of SBL was increased to 17.56 in 2020-21 that was 13.99 in 2019-20 that very
positive performance indication for the organization. Efficiency ratios we’re static for the last
five years along with Covid situation by 25.18%. Cost of deposit decreased in the pandemic
situation. Cost of fund was also decreased in 2020-21 comparing to the previous years. In the
question of the liquidity ratios the organization has maintained the standard value like in 2020-21
the current ratio was 1.89 where the standard value is 2:1. So, it was in a moderate level.
EPS was also being an increasing trend in SBL. In 2020-21 the EPS was 7.14 that was 5.98 in
one year back. Capital adequacy ratio gave stable results over here. It was very close to 10% for
the last five years. Cash reserve ratio and statutory liquidity ratio were in upwards trend in SBL.
So, the overall performance was good enough considering the situation but some aspects we’re
alarming for the banking industry and SBL as well.
In the following pages breakdown of the some key ratios are shown and discussed critically to
explore the real financial scenario of SBL during the Covid situation. In narrow sense some
ratios shows that SBL performs above standard but considering the broad picture the conclusion
is draws negatively. So SBL needs to focus on th9s areas to enhance performance in the post-
Covid situation.
Page 23 of 32
Table 5.7: Measuring the change rate of net profit per employees
Amount in Million
Particulars
2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
In the Covid situation it was also in growing trend. Here the amount is 0.17 million that is
21.43% increase considering the previous year. So, it’s progressing gradually that is positive
indicator for the post-covid performance trends. In the following a graphical representation ig
given that clarifies the fluctuation of the per employees profit in SBL for the last five years. It
was more flutter in 2017-2018 but after the curve was in growing trends that indicates the
performance excellence of SBL in spite of the pandemic situation.
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
Page 24 of 32
Table 5.8: Showing the Return on Investment for the five consecutive years
Table 5.9: Current ratio analysis of SBL for the last five years
Page 25 of 32
2
1.5
0.5
0
2020-21 2019-2020 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
Current Ratio 1.89 1.87 1.58 1.67 1.46
Table 5.10: Showing the Change rate of EPS for the last five years
20
15
10
0
2020-21 2019-2020 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
Page 26 of 32
Table: 5.11: CRR of SBL for the last five years
13%
7.90% 8.08%
7.30% 7.22%
Page 27 of 32
5.2 Findings the Level of Challenges and the Implications of Strategies
(A) Opinion on the level of challenges SBL faced during COVID situation
Table 5.12: Measuring the level of challenges during COVID situation in SBL
Areas of Challenges Level of Challenges Mean Standard
Deviation
1 2 3 4 5
Lack of modern and hi-tech equipment 8 6 0 1 0 1.60 3.74
Restricted business hours due to Govt. regulation 0 2 1 9 3 3.87 3.54
Overall position of the general credit 0 3 1 8 3 3.73 3.08
Slip of operating profit and capital shortfall 1 2 2 7 3 3.60 2.35
Declining profitability ratios 0 1 0 11 4 4.40 4.66
Liquidity crisis 4 7 1 3 0 2.20 2.74
Interpretation: In the previous analysis it’s seen that SBL had verities in performance during
the Covid situation. In some extents it did really well due to Pandemic but in some extents it
failed to cop up with and logically the performance was declined. Here the response of the
respondents is presented to show what about they think about the challenges if SBL during the
Covid situation. In this Likert scale 1 represents poorly challenging and 5 represents highly
challenging factors. Total six factors were raised to test the level of challenges. Here the
challenging factors were declining profitability ratios, restricted business hours due to
government regulations, position of the general credit and capital shortfall due to clients’
incapability. Here the mean of all the factors were above average like the mean if declining
profitability ratios is 4.40 that is in the middle of the challenging and highly challenging
parameters. Lack of modern and Hi-Tech equipment and liquidity crisis showed low challenge
over here as SBL was below the ideal values of the current ratios. But the ratios we’re growing
comparing to the previous years. Here the mean we’re 1.60 and 2.30 respectively that was
positive sign for SBL and helped it to maintain performance due to Covid. Here the overall
picture is pretty good for SBL.
Page 28 of 32
(B) Opinion on the effectiveness of strategies to recover challenges due to COVID
Table 5.13: Measuring the effectiveness of strategies that have been taken to cope up with
the challenges of COVID
Areas of Effectiveness Level of Effectiveness Mean Standard
Deviation
1 2 3 4 5
Technological innovation and digitalization 1 2 1 3 8 4.00 2.92
Risk Management thresholds 0 3 1 8 3 3.73 3.08
Focusing on agent banking 0 12 0 2 1 2.47 5.09
Increasing societal scrutiny through SME 1 2 1 7 4 3.73 2.55
finance, agricultural/rural credit
Utilization of non-performing loan 0 1 2 10 2 3.87 4.00
Redesigning the business model 0 11 2 2 0 2.40 4.58
Interpretation: In the phase of the questionnaire, the motive was collecting data to test
effectiveness if the strategies that SBL applied to cover up the challenges of Covid situation.
Based on the challenging edge they set down their strategies. Here the first factors were
technological innovation and digitalization. The response was really positive for the bank as the
mean was 4. Most of the respondents we’re happy with the digitalization as SBL implemented
Sonali Bank e-sheba and e-wallet during the pandemic. The second factor was risk management
measures. Here the effectiveness was moderate. Mixed opinion was drawn over here but the
mean 3.73 represents effectiveness of risk management system.
The third factor utilization of non-performing loan as every bank had huge amount of idle loan
during the Pandemic because of economic condition. Along with the collaboration with the
government of Bangladesh SBL invested on industrial finance that helped to respondents to
show opinion over here. The mean value of 3.87 represents moderately effectiveness of the
strategy. Increasing social scrutiny during Covid situation helped SBL to maintain performance
agility during Covid. Here the mean 3.73 represents positive sign for the bank.
Focusing on agent banking is the common practice for most of the banks to spread banking
everywhere. SBL starts to practice agent banking concept. But during Covid situation it didn’t
get enough monetary return from the agent banking. The main value of 2.47 shows less of
effectiveness of this strategy.
Page 29 of 32
Finally redesigning the business model wasn’t effective during the Pandemic situation. The mean
of the response 2.40 clarifies the ineffectiveness of the strategy. But the overall picture of SBL
was pretty good for SBL due to pandemic but it was not up to the mark as SBL is the largest
state-owned commercial Bank in Bangladesh.
Interpretation: In the Covid situation SBL showed mixed outlook regarding the financial
performance. Some areas it has done really well due to the challenges of the pandemic but in
some extent it has failed to show its profitability. Its interest expense increased in the pandemic
beside its interest come declined. So logically it was negative balance in the net interest earning
section. But return on investment increased remarkably following with operating profit and
earning per share. It showed very alarming situation in the general credit section. Here total
disbursement and recovery was in negative value comparing to the previous years.
Particulars Mean
Interpretation: Level of challenges and effectiveness of strategies during Covid situation both
are moderate for SBL due to its on time action and operational excellence. But it has some
alarming areas that need to be improved to perform in the post Covid situation. The areas are
focusing more on agent banking, loan recovery and risk management practices.
Page 30 of 32
QUESTIONNAIRE
The Questionnaire is given below that is used to find out the financial performance gap and
strategies have been taken to enhance performance during COVID situation in SBL.
Dear Sir/Madam,
As per the completion of MBA degree I need to prepare an internship report on the topic of
‘Financial Performance Analysis during COVID Situation: A Study on Sonali Bank
Limited’. For this purpose I would like to collect data to make my report informative and
practical. Please provide your kind feedback regarding the questions. I assure that I will maintain
entire privacy of the data. I also assure that this information will be used only for academic
purposes.
A. Personal Information (1-3): (Please put a tick mark which is suited to you).
Name (Optional):
C. Information regarding the implications of strategies has been taken to cope up with the
challenging factors due to COVID situations.
Please rate in 1 to 5 scales to show your expression regarding the strategies of Sonali Bank
Limited to recover the COVID challenges. Here,
Highly Ineffective=1, Ineffective=2, Neuteal-3, Effective=4, Highly Effective=5
No Particulars 1 2 3 4 5
1 Technological innovation and digitalization
2 Risk Management thresholds
3 Utilization of non-performing loan
4 Increasing societal scrutiny through SME finance,
agricultural/rural credit
5 Focusing on agent banking
6 Redesigning the business model
Page 32 of 32