Geophysics uses physical properties of rocks to study the Earth. It is an important tool in mineral exploration as it can quickly map large areas and detect subtle variations that may indicate mineral deposits. There are two main approaches - geological studies focus on rock composition while geophysical studies examine physical property variations. Different methods measure properties like density, magnetism, radioactivity, and electricity. Surveys can be done from the air, on the ground, or down boreholes to provide information at different scales about the subsurface.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views25 pages
Chapter 1
Geophysics uses physical properties of rocks to study the Earth. It is an important tool in mineral exploration as it can quickly map large areas and detect subtle variations that may indicate mineral deposits. There are two main approaches - geological studies focus on rock composition while geophysical studies examine physical property variations. Different methods measure properties like density, magnetism, radioactivity, and electricity. Surveys can be done from the air, on the ground, or down boreholes to provide information at different scales about the subsurface.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25
Chapter 1
• Geophysics is the application of method of physics to the
study of the Earth. • Geophysical methods respond to differences in the physical properties of rocks. • Geophysics is an integral part of most mineral exploration programmes, both greenfields and brownfields, and is increasingly used during the mining of ore bodies. • It is widely used because it can map large areas quickly and cost effectively, delineate subtle physical variations in the geology that might otherwise not be observed by field geological investigations and detect occurrences of a wide variety of mineral deposits. Physical versus chemical characterisation of the geological environment • The geophysical view of the geological environment focuses on variations in the physical properties within some volume of rock. • This is in direct contrast with the geological view. • The bulk chemistry is inferred from visual and chemical assessment of the proportions of different silicate and carbonate minerals at locations where the geology happens to be exposed, or has been drilled. • These two fundamentally different approaches to assessing the geological environment mean that a particular area of geology may appear homogeneous to a geologist but may be geophysically heterogeneous, and vice versa. • The two perspectives are complementary, but they may also appear to be contradictory. • Some geophysical methods can measure the actual physical property of the subsurface, but all methods are sensitive to physical property contrasts or relative changes in properties, i.e. the juxtaposition of rocks with different physical properties. • It is the changes in physical properties that are detected and mapped. • This relativist geophysics approach is another fundamental aspect that differs from the absolutist geological approach. • For example, one way of geologically classifying igneous rocks is according to their silica content, with absolute values used to define categories such as felsic, intermediate, mafic etc. • The geophysical approach is equivalent to being able to tell that one rock contains, say, 20% more silica than another, without knowing whether one or both are mafic, felsic etc. • The link between the geological and geophysical perspectives of the Earth is petrophysics – the study of the physical properties of rocks and minerals, which is the foundation of the interpretation of geophysical data. Geophysical methods in exploration and mining • Geophysical methods are used in mineral exploration for geological mapping and to identify geological environments favorable for mineralisation. • i.e. to directly detect, or target, the mineralised environment. • During exploitation of mineral resources, geophysics is used both in delineating and evaluating the ore itself. • There are five main classes of geophysical methods. • distinguished according to the physical properties of the geology to which they respond. • The gravity and magnetic methods detect differences in density and magnetism, respectively, by measuring variations in the Earth’s gravity and magnetic fields. • The radiometric method detects variations in natural radioactivity, from this the radio element content of the rocks can be estimated. • The seismic method detects variations in the elastic properties of the rocks, manifest as variations in the behavior of seismic waves passing through them. • Seismic surveys are highly effective for investigating layered stratigraphy, so they are the mainstay of the petroleum industry but are comparatively rarely used by the minerals industry. • The electrical methods, based on the electrical properties of rocks and minerals, are the most diverse of the five classes. • Electrical conductivity, or its reciprocal resistivity, can be obtained by measuring differences in electrical potentials in the rocks. • When the potentials arise from natural processes the technique is known as the spontaneous potential or self-potential (SP) method. • When they are associated with artificially generated electric currents passing through the rocks, the technique is known as the resistivity method. • An extension to this is the induced polarisation (IP) method which measures the ability of rocks to store electric charge. • Electrical properties can also be investigated by using electric currents created and measured through the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction. • In electromagnetic (EM) methods, whilst electrical conductivity remains an important factor. • different implementations of the technique can cause other electrical properties of the rocks to influence the measurements. • The physical-property-based categorization described above is complemented by a two-fold classification • into either passive or active methods. • Passive methods use natural sources of energy, – of which the Earth’s gravity and magnetic fields are two examples, to investigate the ground. • The geophysical measurement is made with some form of instrument, known as a detector, sensor or receiver. • The receiver measures the response of the local geology to the natural energy. • The passive geophysical methods are the gravity, magnetic, radiometric and SP methods, plus a form of electromagnetic surveying known as magnetotellurics. • Active geophysical methods involve the deliberate introduction of some form of energy into the ground, – for example seismic waves, electric currents, electromagnetic waves etc. • Again, the ground’s response to the introduced energy is measured with some form of detector. • The need to supplement the detector with a source of this energy, often called the transmitter • means that the active methods are more complicated and expensive to work with. • They do have the advantage that – the transmission of the energy into the ground can be controlled to produce responses that provide particular information about the subsurface, – and to focus on the response from some region (usually depth) of particular interest. • Note that, confusingly, the cause of a geophysical response in the subsurface is also commonly called a source. Airborne, ground and in-ground surveys • Geophysical surveying involves making a series of measurements over an area of interest. • Usually, a single survey instrument is used to traverse the area, either on the ground, in the air or within a drill hole. • Surveys from space or on water are also possible but are uncommon in the mining industry. • In general, airborne measurements made from a low-flying aircraft are more cost-effective than ground measurements for surveys covering a large area or comprising a large number of readings. • The chief advantages of airborne surveying relative to ground surveying are – the greater speed of data acquisition, and – the completeness of the survey coverage. • As exploration progresses and focuses on smaller areas, there is a general reduction in both the extent of geophysical surveys and the distances between the individual readings in a survey. • Airborne surveys are usually part of the reconnaissance phase, it is often the initial phase of exploration. • Some modern airborne systems offer higher resolution by surveying very close to the ground. • and may find application in the later stages of exploration. • Ground and drillhole surveys, on the other hand, offer the highest resolution of the subsurface. • They are mostly used for further investigation of areas targeted from the reconnaissance work for their higher prospectivity, • i.e. they are used at the smaller prospect scale – Methods that can be implemented from the air include magnetics, known as aeromagnetics; – gravity, sometimes referred to as aerogravity or as currently implemented for mineral exploration as airborne gravity gradiometry; – and electromagnetics, usually referred to as airborne electromagnetics (AEM). • All the geophysical methods can be implemented downhole, i.e. in a drillhole. • There are two quite distinct modes of making downhole measurements: downhole logging and downhole surveying. • Downhole logging is where the in situ physical properties of the rocks penetrated by a drillhole are measured to produce a continuous record of the measured parameter. • Downhole logs are commonly used for making stratigraphic correlations between drillholes. • Measurements of several physical parameters, producing a suite of logs, allow the physical characterisation of the local geology • Despite the valuable information obtainable, multiparameter logging is not ubiquitous in mineral exploration. • Downhole surveying is designed to investigate the larger region surrounding the drillhole, • with physical property variations obtained indirectly, and to indicate the direction and even the shape of targets. • That is, downhole electrical conductivity logging measures the conductivity of the rocks that form the drillhole walls, whereas a downhole electro magnetic survey detects conductivity variations. • Downhole geophysical surveys increase the radius of investigation of the drillhole, increase the depth of investigation and provide greater resolution of buried targets. • Geophysical surveys are sometimes conducted in open-pit and underground mines. • measurements are made in vertical shafts and/or along (inclined) drives, usually to detect and delineate ore horizons. • Application and implementation of geophysics underground tend to be unique to a particular situation, and survey design requires a fair degree of ingenuity to adapt the arrangement of transmitter and receiver to the confines of the underground environment. • They are usually highly focused towards determining a specific characteristic of a small volume of ground in the immediate surrounds. • Electrical and mechanical interference from mine infrastructure limits the sensitivity of surveys, which require a high level of planning and coordination with mining activities. Geophysical methods and mineral deposits • The physical properties of the geological environment most commonly measured in mining geophysics are density, magnetism, radioactivity and electrical properties. • Elastic (seismic) properties are not commonly exploited. • In general, density, magnetism and radioactivity are used to map the geology. • The limited use of electrical properties is due to their non-availability from an airborne platform, although AEM-derived conductivity measurements are becoming more common. • Direct detection of a mineralised environment may depend upon any one or more of density, magnetism, radioactivity, electrical properties and possibly elasticity. • Table 1.1 summarises how contrasts in physical properties are exploited in exploration and mining of various types of mineral deposits, and in groundwater and petroleum studies.