Driver Drowsiness Detection System
Driver Drowsiness Detection System
net/publication/314466114
CITATIONS READS
6 1,347
2 authors, including:
Smitha P S
Sree Chitra Thirunal College Of Engineering
13 PUBLICATIONS 29 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Smitha P S on 29 January 2020.
Abstract: The advancement of technologies for averting drowsiness at the wheel is a key dilemma in
the field of accident p r e v e n t i o n systems. Preventing drowsiness during driving necessitates a scheme
for precisely perceiving deterioration in driver’s vigilance and a means for alerting and reviving the
driver. Drowsy Driver Detection System has been developed, using a non-intrusive machine vision based
concepts. This system offers a method for driver eye detection, which could be used for observing a
driver’s fatigue level while he/she is maneuvering a vehicle. The system uses a small monochrome
security camera that points directly towards the driver’s face and monitors the driver’s eyes in order to
detect fatigue. In such a case when fatigue is detected, a warning signal is issued to alert the driver. This
paper describes the method that has been proposed for finding the eyes, and also for determining if the
eyes are open or closed. The system deals with using information obtained for the contour of the image to find
the edges of the face, which narrows the area of where the eyes may exist. Once the face area is found, the eyes
are found by computing the contour. Once the eyes are located, converting to binary and by counting the
bright pixels in the eye area determine whether the eyes are open or closed. The system is also able to detect
when the eyes cannot be found, and works under reasonable lighting conditions.
I. Introduction
Sleep-divested driving is the process of functioning a motor vehicle while being
continuously messed up by lack of sleep. It is a key trigger of many motor vehicle catastrophes, and it can
blight the human brain a s m u c h a s alcohol c an. Drowsiness i n f l u e n c e mental alertness,
intensifying the risk of can be triggered by numerous causes such as fatigue, lack of sleep and the use of
medication. In addition, an alternative reason that can b e c o n t e m p l a t e d i s the dullness o f
driving on expressways or in jam-packed traffic. The p e r s i s t e n t construction of highways
and upgrading of vehicle operation have made it feasible for drivers to benefit from enjoyable a n d r e s t
f u l d r i v i n g . Conversely, d r i v e r s a r e more pertinent to maneuvers their vehicles under tedious driving
circumstances.
The development of a scheme for distinguishing or avoiding drowsiness at the controls is a major
contest in the domain of accident averting practices Probable procedures for perceiving drowsiness
in drivers can be generally classified into four major classes: sensing of physiological characteristics, sensing
of driver operation, sensing of vehicle response, monitoring the response of driver. Among these different
methods, the best detection precision is accomplished with methods that are supported on
physiological prodigies. Physiological measurements can be executed in two approaches: determining
variations in physiological signals, such as brain waves, heart rate etc using electrodes; and measuring
physical changes such as sagging posture, leaning of the driver‟s head and the open/closed states of the
eyes. An EEG-based system developed by [1] was able to detect fatigue with an error percentage of around
10%, which the authors allege to be very steadfast. Related EEG centered analyses were also conducted by
[2], [3] and [4]. The foremost disadvantage with these systems is that electrodes have to be appended to
driver, producing frustration to him.
The vehicle restraining schemes that might be used for getting the impression of
driving operation comprises the steering wheel, accelerator, brake pedal or transmission shift lever.
The vehicle performance perceived might be the vehicle speed, lateral acceleration, yaw rate or lateral
displacement. Since these practices permit noncontact recognition of drowsiness, they do not provide the
driver any impression of uneasiness. On the damaging p a r t , t h e y ar e f o c u s e d to s e v e r a l p r e c i n c t s
depending on the vehicle category and driving circumstances. It would also be essential to
formulate distinct detection logic for each type of vehicle. Still a different dilemma with this tactic is that
detection would not be feasible at minimal pace.
An analysis of the human eyes under a provision of d i m i n i s h e d vigilance specifies that
www.iosrjournals.org 34 | Page
Driver Drowsiness Detection System
the eyes are constricted than in a wide-awake status and that there are occasions when the eyes actually close.
Figure1 offers experimental findings demonstrating the vigilance level and the number of times
the driver's eyes closed for two or more seconds while driving on a test course. Good correlation is seen
between the two sets of data. This result indicates that a reduced level of alertness could be detected
with good accuracy by m o n i t o r i n g changes in the degree of openness of the driver's eyes.
Second section explains the proposed method. In the third section m e t h o d o l o g y is explained.
Results have been explained in fourth section and fifth section is conclusion and future scope
III. Methodology
3.1. Flowchart of major functions
It has been stated that the proposed method work very well for IR images. Fig 3 shows the
flowchart of major functions.
3.2. Face Detection
At first the video of driver is captured using an IR camera which is fixed in front of the driver behind
www.iosrjournals.org 35 | Page
Driver Drowsiness Detection System
the steering in a position so that driver‟s face can be clearly captured. Then the input video is converted to
frames and each frame is processed separately. Viola Jones method of face detection is then used. This
procedure classifies images based on the value of simple features. The simple features used are reminiscent
of Haar basis functions. More specifically, three kinds of features are used. The value of a two-rectangle feature
is the difference between the sum of the pixels within two Rectangular regions. The regions have the same size
and shape and are horizontally or vertically adjacent. A three-rectangle feature computes the sum within two
outside rectangles subtracted from the sum in a centre rectangle. Finally a four-rectangle feature computes the
difference between diagonal pairs of rectangles. A cascade of classifiers is then constructed to achieve
increased detection performance while radically reducing computation time. The overall form of the detection
process is that of a degenerate decision tree. A series of classifiers are then applied to every sub-window.
The initial classifier eliminates a large number of negative examples with very little processing. Subsequent
layers eliminate additional negatives but require additional computation. After several stages of processing the
number of sub-windows has been reduced radically. Further processing can take any form such as
additional stages of the cascade (as in detection system) or an alternative detection system. Much like a
decision tree, subsequent classifiers are trained using those examples which pass through all the previous
stages. The cascade design process is driven from a set of detection and performance goals.
www.iosrjournals.org 36 | Page
Driver Drowsiness Detection System
Reference
[1] S. G. Klauer, T. A. Dingus, V. L. Neale, , and J. D. Sudweeks, “The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An
analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DC, DOT HS, vol.
810, 2006.
[2] T. Akerstedt, G. Kecklund, and L. H¨orte, “Night driving, season, and the risk of highway accidents.” Slee, vol. 24, pp. 401–
406, 2001.
[3] J. Connor, R. Norton, S. Ameratunga, E. Robinson, I. Civil, R. Dunn, J. Bailey, and R. Jackson, “Driver sleepiness and risk of
serious injury to car occupants: Population based control study.” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, pp. 1125– 1129, 2002.
[4] J. Horne and L. Reyner, “Vehicle accidents related to sleep: A review.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 56, pp.
189–294, 1999.
[5] L. M. Bergasa, J. Nuevo, M. A´ . Sotelo, R. Barea, and M. E. L. Guille´n, “Realtime system for monitoring driver vigilance,”
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2006.
[6] C. Papadelis, Z. Chen, C. Kourtidou-Papadeli, P. Bamidis, I. Chouvarda, E. Bekiaris, and N. Maglaveras, “Monitoring sleepiness
with on-board electrophysiological recordings for preventing sleep-deprived traffic accidents.” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 118,
no. 9, pp. 1906–1922, September 2007.
[7] J. Faber, “Detection of different levels of vigilance by eeg pseudo spectra.” Neural Network World, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 285–
290, 2004.
[8] N. Wright, B. Stone, T. Horberry, and N. Reed, “ A review of in-vehicle sleepiness detection devices,” TRL Limited,
Published Project Report PPR157, 2007.
[9] T. Wakita, K. Ozawa, C. Miyajima, K. Igarashi, K. Itou, K. Takeda, and F. Itakura, “Driver identification using driving
behavior signals,” IEICE - Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. E89-D, no. 3, pp. 1188–1194, 2006.
[10] Y. Takei and Y. Furukawa, “Estimate of driver‟s fatigue through steering motion.” IEEE International Conference on
Systems, Man and Cybernetics., vol. 2, p. 1765–1770, 2005.
www.iosrjournals.org 37 | Page