Icing Certification of Korean Utility Helicopter KUH 1 Artificial Icing Flight Test
Icing Certification of Korean Utility Helicopter KUH 1 Artificial Icing Flight Test
Icing Certification of Korean Utility Helicopter KUH 1 Artificial Icing Flight Test
Robert J. Flemming3
Aviation Icing Consultant, Trumbull, CT 06611, USA
and
David C. Parkins4
Downloaded by MONASH UNIVERSITY on June 14, 2017 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3930
In support of the military qualification for flight into icing conditions of the Korean
Utility Helicopter KUH-1 Surion, Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd. (KAI) and the
Netherlands Aerospace Center (NLR) have conducted artificial icing flight trials using the
US Army Redstone Test Center (RTC) Helicopter Icing Spray System (HISS). Testing took
place out of Sawyer International Airport in Marquette, MI, over a period of four months in
the 2015/2016 winter season. The artificial icing flight test campaign was aimed at opening
up the icing flight envelope in a controlled and safe manner, prior to flight testing in natural
icing conditions. Despite unfavorably warm weather conditions, the KUH-1 artificial icing
flight test campaign was completed successfully in February of 2016. The aircraft has been
tested up to the limits of its certification icing envelope and beyond. In total 56 individual
test points have been recorded, subjecting the aircraft to the full range of icing conditions for
which operational approval is requested. Test points flown at temperatures colder than -
20°C and with ambient relative humidity greater than 40% produced less ice accretion and a
lower icing torque rise than expected.
I. Introduction
T HE Korean Utility Helicopter KUH-1 is being qualified for flight in icing conditions. The KUH-1 has been
developed by Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd. (KAI), with technical support from Airbus Helicopters, formerly
Eurocopter. The Ice Protection System (IPS) is based largely on technologies and systems proven on other aircraft
having civil certification or operational approval for flight in icing. Artificial and natural icing flight testing has been
performed in the 2015/2016 winter season in the Great Lakes area of Michigan. KAI contracted with the
Netherlands Aerospace Centre (NLR) for icing expertise and technical support throughout the test campaign. The
multinational NLR-KAI test team included icing specialists employed by and under subcontract with NLR, as well
as KAI flight test pilots, maintenance crew, engineering, and program management. Representatives of both the
Korean military airworthiness authority and Ministry of National Defense were present on-site during the entire test
campaign. The team also included US Army staff from Redstone Test Center (RTC) who operated the Helicopter
Icing Spray System (HISS) tanker and RC-12G King Air chase plane.
1
R&D Engineer, Helicopter & Aeroacoustics Department, Netherlands Aerospace Centre (NLR), 1059CM
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2
Senior R&D Engineer, Helicopter & Aeroacoustics Department, Netherlands Aerospace Centre (NLR), 1059CM
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
3
Consultant, AIAA Senior Member.
4
President, American Kestrel Company, LLC, PO Box 0640, Ithaca, NY 14851, AIAA Senior Member.
1
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Copyright © 2017 by Netherlands Aerospace Centre. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission.
II. Background
The KUH-1 has been designed to operate DEF STAN CMI DEF STAN PMI
in icing conditions I and II as defined in App C, IMI, 10,000ft Completed: Fuselage
Table I of DEF STAN 00-970 Part 7/3 Completed: Rotor
Section 7 Leaflet 711/2, subject to a Periodic 2.0
Maximum Icing (PMI) Liquid Water Content
(LWC) limit of 1.0 g/m3. DEF STAN
B. Aircraft Description
Since it is a part of the Primary Mission Configuration, most testing was performed with the Infrared Suppressor
(IRS) installed. The IRS deflects the warm engine exhaust gasses upwards into the main rotor plane in order to
reduce the infrared signature of the aircraft.
2
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Part of the testing was performed with heater coils imbedded at the upper rim of the windshield (referred to as
the windshield eyebrows). The heaters were installed prior to the start of the campaign as a risk reduction strategy,
protecting against the formation of windshield runback ice that may pose a threat to the engines. Once it was
determined that the runback ice accretion was well within engine limitations, the eyebrow ice protection was
removed.
The Rotor Ice Protection System (RIPS) protects the leading edge of the main and tail rotor blades against the
effects of icing. The RIPS power cycle schedule (on-time and off-time) is based on data obtained from the
production aircraft static temperature probes and an accretion-based ice detector. The engine is protected by bleed-
air anti-icing and electrothermal anti-icing of the air intakes. The deflector and support struts of the upper wire cutter
are fully anti-iced. The static temperature probes and horizontal tail plane, including slat, are unprotected; ice shapes
for the horizontal tail are shown in Fig. 3.
C. Prior Testing
Downloaded by MONASH UNIVERSITY on June 14, 2017 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3930
Whereas the artificial icing flight test marks the first aircraft-level test in icing conditions, multiple systems have
been subjected to component-level testing in the earlier development stages. Full-scale non-rotating testing of the
tail rotor IPS was performed in the Goodrich (now UTAS) icing wind tunnel in Ohio.
Icing testing of the engine air intakes with simulated engine mass flow was performed in the CIRA icing wind
tunnel in Italy in 2012. The wind tunnel model consisted of production intake parts integrated with a mock-up of a
substantial part of the forward fuselage, as shown in Fig. 4. Details of the test are provided in Ref. 1.
The effect of ice accretion on the unprotected horizontal stabilizer was substantiated through simulated ice flight
testing. Two critical ice shapes, computed in cooperation with ADSE using LEWICE, were manufactured using 3-D
printing methods and bonded to the tail for dry air flight testing. No significant degradation in handling qualities due
to the ice shapes in Fig. 3 was observed.
Figure 4. Computed horizontal stabilizer and slat Figure 3. KUH-1 engine air intake wind tunnel
ice shapes . Critical ice shapes used for simulated model. Full-scale engine air intake wind tunnel model
icing flight testing of the KUH-1. tested in the CIRA icing wind tunnel.
The Helicopter Icing Spray System (HISS) is part of a modified CH-47D that is operated as a tanker aircraft to
generate artificial icing conditions. The HISS can generate icing clouds with a liquid water content between 0.25
g/m3 and 3.0 g/m3. At the coldest conditions, the lower limit of LWC is increased in order to avoid freezing the spray
nozzles.
3
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
The spray bar system is suspended beneath the tanker and is fed by a 1,800 gallon water tank. Two auxiliary
power units prevent freezing of the spray boom and provide the hot air supply required to atomize the spray at the
nozzles. Two horizontal nozzle arrays generate a spray of approximately 8 ft in height and 36 ft in width.
B. Test Procedure
The artificial icing flights were performed under VFR conditions in close formation between the HISS tanker,
the RC-12G chase plane and the KUH-1 test aircraft. The test altitude is established to match the target static
temperature and the altitude can vary from 3,000 to 10,000 ft above mean sea level. The selection of the test altitude
also takes into account the ambient humidity and turbulence levels. No flights are performed over water, overcast
cloud cover or in the presence of precipitation.
At the end of the immersion, the test aircraft exits the spray and may establish coordinated flight with the chase
airplane for photo documentation. In case of rotor test points, the test aircraft may also proceed with the execution of
a set of basic mission maneuvers. Accreted ice on the rotors is expected to begin to shed or to sublimate soon after
4
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
the end of the immersion in the HISS cloud. Therefore, any chance to obtain valid performance or maneuver data
can only be obtained if acquired soon after the end of the exposure. The need to expedite the acquisition of post
immersion data is even more critical if the ambient temperature is near freezing.
In some cases, large variations in ambient relative humidity are observed along the direction of flight. The effect
on cloud density is clearly distinguishable visually and is recognized by the pilots in the test aircraft as a substantial
change in outside visibility. Where deemed appropriate, the RC-12G chase plane may take an additional post-
immersion data record to quantify the change in icing conditions.
Further details on the standard RTC test procedure are provided in Ref. 2.
D. Immersion Position
Figure 8. HISS spray drop size distribution. Drop size Three separate immersion positions have been
distribution measured by RC-12G and KUH-1 CCP tested, as shown in Fig. 9. The rotor position
compared with DEF STAN requirement (LWC = 0.53 g/m 3, effectively immersed the main and tail rotor, as well
MVD = 24.6 µm, RH = 58%). as the horizontal stabilizer and vertical fin.
5
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Dedicated testing of the tail rotor, as well as the
installation of the horizontal stabilizer simulated ice
shapes was, therefore, deemed unnecessary.
A single rotor test point was defined at a target static ambient temperature of -2°C. This test was intended to
demonstrate a trend towards zero icing torque rise as the kinetic heating of the blades grows large enough to raise
the recovery temperature of the leading-edge above freezing. The test was performed at the following conditions:
Contrary to expectation, the icing torque rise was found to be comparable to that observed around -5°C. Ice
accreted on the main rotor blade up to approximately 60% radius, where an icing extent of around 30% would have
been expected3. It is believed that, at 43.2% relative humidity, the evaporative cooling inside the artificial icing
spray contributed to the increased ice extent and associated torque rise. The test has not been repeated in natural
icing conditions to confirm the torque rise observed behind the HISS tanker.
The practical minimum ambient temperature for artificial icing testing with the HISS tanker lies around -23°C.
At this temperature, the anti-icing capability of the HISS spray boom is marginal and the freezing of one or more of
the nozzles becomes a frequent occurrence. In combination with the generally modest liquid water content
requirement, these cold conditions tend to produce comparatively small drops, as confirmed by Fig. 10. This trend
was exacerbated on this test campaign, because the cold target temperatures were typically only available at an
altitude with relatively humid air, close to developing cloud layers. As a result, the HISS spray was often very dense,
with the lowest reported MVD as small as 17.7 µm.
6
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Commensurate with the smaller drop sizes,
there was comparatively little ice accretion on
unprotected surfaces and a notably reduced icing
torque rise. Two 15-minute RIPS OFF rotor tests
were performed at these cold conditions, one of
which did not produce any noticeable icing torque
rise.
Part 29 aircraft are not certificated for flight in Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) conditions such as freezing
drizzle or freezing rain. Instead, it must be demonstrated that the crew can identify an SLD encounter and safely exit
the condition. The KUH-1 is not fitted with a dedicated SLD marker. Therefore, the crew is reliant on the ice
accretion that forms on standard aircraft features. Typically, SLD cues form due to direct impingement on parts of
the aircraft where it normally does not, due to the high inertia of SLD drops and the correspondingly more ballistic
trajectory of these larger drops.
The primary requirement for the SLD test condition was to obtain adequate LWC in drops larger than 100 μm,
because this allows differentiating between 14 CFR 29 Appendix C drops and the SLD environment. LWC and
ambient temperature were not considered critical parameters for this test. The drop size distribution that has been
achieved on the SLD test is presented in Fig. 12, which also shows the freezing drizzle spectrum defined in 14 CFR
Part 25 Appendix O. Whereas there is no exact agreement with the Appendix O distribution, there is a substantial
amount of liquid water in the SLD range, as per the test objective.
7
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Downloaded by MONASH UNIVERSITY on June 14, 2017 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3930
Figure 13. SLD drop size distribution. Drop size Figure 12. SLD ice accretion. Windshield ice
distribution measured by RC-12G during SLD test and the accretion observed in-flight during SLD testing
14 CFR Part 25 Appendix O Freezing Drizzle MVD>40µm behind the HISS tanker.
spectrum.
Figure 13 presents the ice accretion observed on the windshield and upper windows of the KUH-1 during the
SLD test. Although the curved part of the windshield is expected to be a suitable location for the development of a
visual SLD cue, the runback ice observed in this area at the high test LWC obscures any direct impingement.
Conversely, the ice accretion on the upper window consists entirely of direct impingement and is distinguishable
from flights at DEF STAN CMI/PMI conditions by its density and lateral extent. The test pilots have commented
that the SLD cue on the upper window is suitable for the operational pilot.
D. Effect of IRS
The IRS deflects the warm engine exhaust gasses into the
plane of the rotor disk in order to reduce the infrared
signature of the aircraft. Additionally, the increased frontal
area of the IRS introduces a shadowing effect on
downstream parts of the aircraft. Prior to testing, there was
some debate as to the magnitude of these effects in terms of
the icing of the main rotor and tail. Multiple rotor test points
were, therefore, duplicated without the IRS installed.
No noticeable effect of the IRS on the main rotor ice accretion or the icing torque rise has been observed.
8
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
V. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the test team
members of KAI, ADD, DAPA and RTC for their
dedication to the test program, as well as their
company in between testing.
References
1
De Bruin, A. C., Fatigani, G. and Shin, H. B., “KAI
Surion Helicopter Full-Scale Air Intake Testing at CIRA
Icing Wind Tunnel,” 30th Congress of International
Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Daejeon, Korea,
September 25-30, 2016.
2
“Test Operations Procedure: Aircraft
Natural/Artificial Icing”, US Army Aviation Technical
Test Center, TOP 7-3-537, 2009.
3
Flemming, R. J. and Lednicer, D. A., “Correlation of Figure 16. Test team KUH-1 2015/2016 HISS test
Icing Relationships with Airfoil and Rotorcraft Icing campaign. Members of KAI, NLR and RTC test team at
Data,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 23, No. 10, 1986, pp. 737- Sawyer International Airport, MI.
743.
9
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics