Scribd
Upload
51 views

LabMan Exercise # 3

The document provides directions for an assignment on quality assurance for a Bachelor of Science in Medical Laboratory Science program. Students must conduct a 15-20 minute video interview with a registered medical technologist on the topic of quality assurance. The video should include questions about the relevance of quality assurance, challenges of controlling laboratory machines, troubleshooting quality control results, and challenging quality control samples. Students will be graded by their professor and peers.

Uploaded by

Lyrics Lyrics
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
51 views

LabMan Exercise # 3

The document provides directions for an assignment on quality assurance for a Bachelor of Science in Medical Laboratory Science program. Students must conduct a 15-20 minute video interview with a registered medical technologist on the topic of quality assurance. The video should include questions about the relevance of quality assurance, challenges of controlling laboratory machines, troubleshooting quality control results, and challenging quality control samples. Students will be graded by their professor and peers.

Uploaded by

Lyrics Lyrics
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Lyceum of the Philippines University – Batangas

College of Allied Medical Professions


Bachelor of Science in Medical Laboratory Science

MLS201 – Laboratory Management

Activity no. 3 – Quality Assurance

Directions

1. Look for one Registered Medical Technologist or Chief Medical Technologist. Please make
an appointment with them and ask their permission to conduct an interview.
2. Make a 15 to 20-minute video presentation (in mp4 format) of your interview with your
chosen medical technologist.
3. The video presentation should include the whole interview or the clip of their answer. The
topic of your discussion is quality assurance. You will use the following as your guide
questions.
a. In your point of view as a medical technologist, how do you see the relevance of
quality assurance in laboratory medicine?
b. What is the most challenging part of controlling laboratory machines? And how do
you cover those challenges?
c. If in case the result of your QC is not within an acceptable range, how do you
troubleshoot your results/machine?
d. Of all NEQAS samples, which is the most challenging sample to test? Why?
4. The interview may be held online or face-to-face, depending on the availability of your
interviewee.
5. Make sure that all of you have a photo together with your interviewee. At least three group
members will appear in the video presentation, and the rest may do the editing and likes.
6. You have two weeks to work on this output.
7. As an individual work, each student should appear at the end of the video stating her short
reflection regarding the importance of quality control in attaining reliable and accurate
results. Each student can have at least 1-2 minutes of video sharing.
8. Your professor will give 80% of your grade, while the remaining 20% will be coming from
your peers.

Prepared by:

Mark Kerwin F. Sayas, RMT, MSMLS, DTA


Instructor
Rubrics for Grading

Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Good Fair


(4 points) (3 points) (2 points) (1 point)
Organization The presentation The presentation The presentation The presentation
and video output was very easy to was easy to was not easy to was difficult to
follow follow follow follow due to the
disorganization
of the
utterances.
Understanding The student The student The student The student did
of topic clearly seemed to clearly not show an
understood the understand the understood most adequate
topic in-depth main points of aspects of the understanding
and presented the topic and topic and of the topic.
his/her presented those presented
information with ease. his/her
convincingly. information with
ease.
Accuracy of All information Most information Most information Most of the
information presented in presented in presented in information was
writing was clear, writing was clear, writing was clear inaccurate or not
accurate and accurate and but was not clear.
thorough thorough usually accurate.
Comprehension The student was The student was The student was The student was
able to able to able to unable to
accurately accurately accurately accurately
answer almost answer most answer a few answer
all questions questions posed questions posed questions posed
posed by by audience by the audience by audience
audience about about the topic. about the topic. about the topic.
the topic.
Timeliness of Submitted on Submitted late
submission time

Rubrics for Peer Evaluation

Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never


Criteria
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Willingness to
participate
(Involvement)
Willingness to
share
idea/thoughts
Willingness to
take the
initiative

You might also like