CRW2602 Assignment 2
CRW2602 Assignment 2
written by
AriaLawTutor
www.stuvia.com
CRW2602
ASSIGNMENT 2
SEMESTER 2 OF 2022
BY ARIA
THE LAW TUTOR
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and
reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this
document as your own work
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this
document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are
provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied.
The author assumes no liability as a result of reliance and use of the contents of
this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research and
reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold
or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
QUESTION 1
X insults Y over the telephone but Y does not understand the language X
speaks and therefore does not feel humiliated:
QUESTION 2
1. The perpetrator must physically accompany the unmarried minor when he or she
leaves the parental home.
2. The perpetrator should have the intention of removing the unmarried minor
for a substantial period of time.
4. The perpetrator must have the intention that he himself should have
intercourse with or marry the minor.
Meaning of Abduction: The person removed must be an unmarried minor, and the
abduction can occur with or without the consent of the minor. The intention must be
that the abductor, or someone else, marries or has sexual intercourse with the
minor.
QUESTION 3
1. Embezzlement.
2. Removal of property.
3. Arrogation of possession.
Considering the possible liability of an accused for the crime of theft (in any of its
forms, i.e. theft in the form of removal of property, embezzlement or arrogation
of possession)
QUESTION 4
3. The victim need not be physically incapacitated since mere threats of violence
suffice.
Robbery: Usually the violence or threats of violence precede the acquisition of the
property.
QUESTION 5
X inserts his tennis racket through an open window of a residential house and,
in this way, gains control of Y’s handbag. X lifts Y’s handbag out of the window
with the intention of appropriating the handbag permanently.
1. X does not commit housebreaking with the intent to steal as there was no
entering into the building.
2. X does not commit housebreaking with the intent to steal as there was no
breaking into the building.
4. X does not commit housebreaking with the intent to steal as the house does not
qualify as a structure in respect of which this crime can be committed.
The entry is complete the moment X has inserted any part of his body, or any
instrument he is using for that purpose, into the opening, with the intention of
thereby exercising control over some of the contents of the building or structure
(Melville 1959 (3) SA 544 (E)).
QUESTION 6
2. There is no exception to the rule that one cannot steal one’s own property.
QUESTION 7
QUESTION 8
QUESTION 9
2. The defamatory allegation needs to come to the attention of the victim only.
QUESTION 10