Description of document: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of

Inspector General (OIG) report: Supervision of Aliens

Commensurate with Risk (OIG-11-81) and related
communications, 2011

Requested date: 08-July-2011

Released date: 15-Sep-2011

Posted date: 21-May-2012

Date/date range of documents: Report: May 2011 (revised edition)

Email communications: July 2011

Source of document: FOIA Officer

Department of Homeland Security
Office of Inspector General (OIG)
245 Murray Drive, Bldg. 410
Mail Stop – 2600
Washington, D.C. 20528-0001
Fax: 202-254-4398
Email: [email protected]

The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials
made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its
principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however,
there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and
its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or
damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the
governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from
government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns
about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in
question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
 Office ofInspector General

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528

Homeland
Security
SEP 1 5 2011

Subject: Freedom oflnformation Act Request No. 2011-144- Final Response

This is in response to your Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) request to the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Office oflnspector General (OIG), dated July 8, 2011, and seeking
records related to DHS-OIG report titled, "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk"
(OIG-11-81) (copy attached for reference). Your request was received in this office on July 12,
2011.

The DHS-OIG conducts independent investigations, audits, inspections, and special reviews of
DHS personnel, programs, and operations to detect and deter waste, fraud, and abuse, and to
promote integrity, economy, and efficiency within DHS. In response to your request, a search of
the DHS-OIG's Office of Audits was conducted. That search resulted in the attached records
responsive to your request. We have reviewed the responsive records under the FOIA to
determine whether they may be accessed under the FOIA's provisions. Based on that review, this
office is providing the following:

46 page(s) are being released in full (RIF);

102 page(s) are being released in part (RIP);
27 page(s) are withheld in full (WIF);
37 page( s) are duplicate copies of material already processed;
___ page(s) are non-responsive to your request and therefore withheld in full;
20 page(s) were referred to another entity. 1

The exemptions cited for withholding records or portions of records are marked below.

Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 Privacy Act,

5 U.S.C. § 552a
D ss2(b)(l) D ss2(b)(4) D 552(b)(7)(B) C8J 552aG)(2)
D ss2(b)(2) C8J 552(b)(5) D 552(b)(7)(C) C8J 552a(k)(2)
D ss2(b)(3) C8J 552(b)(6) D 552(b)(7)(D) D ss2a(k)(S)
D 552(b)(7)(A) 0552(b)(7)(E) D Other:

1
Please note that some of the 20 pages referred to ICE are duplicates of what OIG has already released to'you in
response to this request. Since only portions of these pages contained ICE information, OIG had to refer the entire
document to ICE for review and direct response .
OIG redacted from the enclosed documents, names and identifying information of third parties to
protect the identities of these individuals. Absent a Privacy Act waiver, the release of such
information concerning the third parties named in these records would result in an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy in violation of the PA. That information is also protected from
disclosure pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(C) of the FOIA.

Exemption 5, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5)

Exemption 5 of the FOIA protects "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which

would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency." See
5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5). DHS-OIG is invoking the deliberative process and attorney client privilege
of Exemption 5 to protect information that falls within that privilege's domain.

Exemption 6, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6)

Exemption 6 allows withholding of "personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure
of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." See 5 U.S.C. §
552(b)(6)(emphasis added). DHS-OIG is invoking Exemption 6 to protect email addresses,
names, and initials of lower level employees, and non-agency employees.

Referral

Additionally, 20 pages have been referred to United States Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE), a DHS component. This DHS component will process the records under the
FOIA and respond to you directly. Should you wish to contact ICE you may write to:

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Freedom of Information Act Office
500 12th Street, SW, Stop 5009
Washington, D.C. 20536-5009
FOIA Officer: Catrina Pavlik-Keenan
FOIA Requester Service Center Contact: Ryan Law
Phone: 202-732-0600 or 866-633-1182
Fax: 202-732-0660
E-mail: [email protected]

This referral was made in accordance with DHS regulations, which require DHS entities to
determine whether another entity is better able to determine whether records are exempt from
disclosure under the FOIA, and if so, then the record must be referred to the other entity. See 6
C.F.R. § 5.4(c)(2). In general, the entity that created a record is presumed best able to determine
whether it may be disclosed under the FOIA.

Fees

Provisions of the FOIA allow us to recover part of the cost of complying with your request. In
this instance, because the cost is below the $14 minimum, there is no charge. See 6 CFR §
5.1 l(d)(4).
 Appeal

You have the right to appeal this response. Your appeal must be in writing and received within
60 days of the date of this response. Please address any appeal to:

FOIA/PA Appeals Unit

DBS/Inspector General
STOP 2600
245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410
Washington, DC 20528

Both the envelope and letter of appeal must be clearly marked, "Freedom of Information
Act/Privacy Act Appeal." Your appeal letter must also clearly identify the DHS-OIG's response.
Additional information on submitting an appeal is set forth in the DHS regulations at 6 C.F.R. §
5.9. If you have any questions about this response please contact Aneet Thind, FOIA/PA
Disclosure Specialist, at 202-254-4373.

The Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) also mediates disputes between FOIA
requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If you wish to contact
OGIS, you may email that entity at [email protected] or call 877-684-6448.

Sincerely,

fJ/})1
Katherine R. Gallo
Assistant Counsel to the Inspector General

Enclosure(s)
FOIA/PA NO.: 2011-144

MIXED DOCUMENTS

46 (RIF)

102 (RIP)

27 (WIF)

37 (DUP)

20 (REFERRED)

- - -
(NR)
 Document 1

Office oflnspector General Project# 10-092-AUD-ICE

Office of Audits ·

ICE's Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Revision of Final Report OIG-11-81(May2011)

I Time I Date·
I I
MEMO OF RECORD ____________
ll:OOPM
,
. 7/8/111

I
/Prepared By
!Holly Snow
I

The audit team was advised that ICE incorrectly included Israel in a list of countries subject to Third
Agency Checks. This list was provided to us during the course of our audit, Supervision ofAliens
Commensurate with Risk, OIG-11-81 (May 2011) and included in Appendix b. Accordingly, we ·
revised Appendix D and reposted the report. The change was based on unaudited data provided by ICE·
through telephone conversations and a press release. The revised report is documented in AS4.e. The
report was distributed as an attachment to the email documented in AS4.f.

Page 1of1
 Snow, Holly
From: Pettersen, Sean~ b6
Sent: Friday, July 01, ~
To: Snow, Holly; Butler, Jewel; Crownover, Gary; Coccaro, Marisa; Trodden, Sharon; Clark,
Elizabeth
Subject: FW: Some internet buzz regarding the "Supervision" report

-----Pf.I=
...- - - - - - ---·------------------

From: Herman, Andrew

·Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 4:52 PM
To: Pettersen, Sean
Subject: Some internet buzz regarding the "Supervision" report

Hey Sean - I hope this message finds you well. FYI - It looks like the "Supervision" report is causing some
internet buzz about Israel being included in the list of SOC subject to the TAC checl<. Below is one of a
number of sources citing our report due to Israel's inclusion in the list SDCs. of
Take care!
Andrew.

htto://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-desifsnates-israel-countrv-tends-promo

" ... The Department of Home.land Security's Office of Inspector Genera! published the list of "specially designated
countries" as an appendix to an unclassified May 11 report--"Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk"--that was
publicly posted on the !nternet. {The appendix is on page 18 of the document) As a matter of policy, according to the
inspector general's report, citizens of Israel and other "specially designated countries" are subjected to a special security
screening called a "Third Agency Check" (TAC) when they are actually detained by Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE), the division of the Department of Homeland Security responsible for enforcing the immigration laws.

" ... In its official response to the report, ICE objected to this recommendation by the inspector general because the agency
says it does not have sufficient resources to do TACs on all aliens from the specially designated countries. Even though
the adminisration includes Israel among "specially designated countries" that it believes "have shown a tendency to
promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members," ICE Spokeswoman Gillian Christensen told
CNSNews.com that the U.S. also considers !srael, as well as some other countries on the "specially designated countries"
list, as partners in the struggle against terrorism. "The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to
terrorism, but rather they are a partner in our efforts to combat global terrorism," Christensen said in a written statement.
"Countries may have been included on the list because of the backgrounds of arrestees, not because of the country's
government itself." "The United States maintains close intelligence-sharing relationships with many of these countries in
order to address security issues within their own borders and in our mutual pursuit of safety and security around the
globe." said Christensen. ICE declined to say who put !srae! on the list or when Israel was put there.
 Email 2

Thind, Aneet

From: Bell, Mark

Sent: ~4PM
To: -----1:>6
Subject: Fw: U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce,· or Protect'
Terrorists; Also Calls Israel Anti-Terror Partner ...

From: b6
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 04:00 PM
To: Richards, Anne; Bell, Mark; Snow, Holly; Butler, Jewel; Pettersen, Sean
Subject: U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce, or Protect' Terrorists; Also Calls Israel
Anti-Terror Partner ...
. .
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/us-designates~israel-countrv-tends-promo

1
 .....
- - - - - · - , - --.---···· ·--·------~-·- ----- ·-----~ · - - - - .-

Email3
"·'

Snow, Holly

·From: Snow, Holly

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:56 PM
To: ·Bell, Mark .
Subject:. FW: bid we specifically get
Attachments: TAC Procedure Memo.pdf

-------------------~----------------------!---'------

FYI~this is the first email I .sent Anne ....

From: Snow,. Holly

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:35 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: Did we specifically get

-described in the att~ched ICE procedure mei:nora~dum from Acting Director Victor Cerda
(D.12.7 in TeamMate). · · · ·

Holl,y Snow
Program Analyst b5,
DHS-OIG Office·of Audits
Denver Field Office
b6
(303)-bb)
(~03)-(o_ff:!c~)___ -·--· _..... _.-- . ________., ___________ . _ . ------ -----·------·- ------~----·---··- _
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:23 PM
To: Bell, Mark; Snow, Holly
Subject: FW: Did we specifically get

The question wasn't just about

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 4: 16 PM
To: Snow, Holly
Subject: Did we specifically get

1
 2 PAGE(S)

Referred to I CE for processing

and response to the requester
 - ---··---------------
·-::.
Email 4

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 6:17 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Did we specifically get

OK good. Will do.

From: Richards, Anne

Se~, 2011 06:16 PM
To:-
Subject: Re: Did we specifically get ?

Ok
CE had already had that doc and email

Let me know if you want anything else

From:
· Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 06:15 PM
To: Richards, Anne b5,
Subject: Re: Did we specifically get ? b6

CE has a call w/ ICE tomorrow AM ..

From: Richards, Anne

Se~, 2011 06:14 PM
To:-
Subject: Re: Did we specifically get ?

You're welcome
But I'm still interested in what you needed it for

From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 06:12 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re:. Did we specifically get

Thank you!

From: Richards, Anne

Se~~ 2011 06:08 PM.
To.--- . ·
Subject: Fw: Did we specifically get

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 3
-·-----.-- -----------------·---- -------·-.
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 3

2
 Email 5

Thind, Aneet

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Thanks, let's talk tomorrow.

Charles K. Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of inspector General
bS,
Department of Homeland Security
b6

From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 06:15 ·PM Eastern Standard Time
To:.
Subject: Fw: Did we specifically get

See below from Anne

From: Richards, Anne:

Sen~, 2011 06:08 PM
To:.............. ·
Subject: Fw: Did we specifically get ?

DUPLICATE. OF EMAIL 3
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 3

2
 Email 6 ·

Snow, Holly
From: Bell, Mark
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:42 PM
To: Snow: Holly ·
Subject: Re: Info

Thanks

From: Snow, Holly

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 04:42 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Cc: Bell, Mark; Pettersen, Sean <
Subject: FW: . .Info

Holl_y5now
Program Analyst
DHS~OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
(303) (bb)
(~?.~) (of~iS~} ....... ,......
From: Pettersen, Sean mailto:
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:40 PM
To: Snow, HolL_
Subject: RE: ~nfo b5,
Hmmm ... .that's interesting! I talked to . a n d discussed the possibility of meeting them next week. llllsaid~as b6
going to talk . t o -

-----------·---------·----·----- -
From: Snow, Holly [mafito:
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Pettersen, Sean
Cc: Crownover~
Subject: FW: -Info

Program Analyst
1
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
(303)-

. HrHollv.,:-------------,------------------------------1----'---

Here is the closest thing I could find to what you were talking about. I will get on Monday. Have a
great weekend.

Program Review Unit

Mission Support Division
Enforcement and Removal Operations
lmmi ration and Customs Enforcement

b5,
b6

The draft report is getting very close to issue-you should hear from Sean today with an update. I hope
you are having a good start to the New Year, and I'm sun~ we'll talk soon.

Thanks again!

.Holl_y 5now
Program Analyst
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
(303)-.
..
,._,.,.X_,,_111111-~ll-~----·- ~-ll------NIO><~-- .....-----

2
Hi Holly,.

Happy New Year! Here is the info ·contain~d in the file

know if you need anything else .. Thanks.
for- I think that this takes care o f - Let me
b5,
b6

Program Review Unit

Mission Support Division
Enforcement and Removal Operations

3
 ·Email 7

Snow, Holly

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:49 PM
To: Snow, Holly
Subject: Re: Info b5

Thank you
----That was very Fielp u

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 6

1
·~ DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 6

2
~UPLICATE OF EMAIL 6

3
 Email 8

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 5:59 PM
To: Reb~ichard
Subject: Re:-lnfo

I do not

From: Reba ck, Richard

Sen : T ur a 07 2011 05:55 PM·
To:
Subject: RE:

Thanks. Do you have the email that is

From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 5:24 PM
To: Reback, Richard
Subject: FW: . .Info

FYI - see below.

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Thursda Jul 07, 2011 5:23 PM bS,
b6

-
Thanks
I believe we would need to

Anne

From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 5:21 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Cc: R.eback, Richard
Subject: RE: . .Info

Is the attached document If you do not know, is the a POC

we can check with?

Please let us know.

-
Thanks,

F rom: Richards, Anne

Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:51 PM
1
 ' "
b6

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 6

2
 Email 9

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

How do you want

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Thursda , July 07, 2011 06:05 PM
To: bS,
Subject: Re:
b6

Anne, Are you able to send us the-mail referenced below? Bottom of chain?
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 8

1
DUPLICATEOF EMAIL 8

2
 3 PAGE(S)

Duplicate ICE Memo held in

the file. Memo was referred to
ICE with email no. 42
 Email 10
Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

b5,
See below
b6
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Thursda Jul 07, 2011 06:08 PM
To:
Subject: Fw:

DUPLICATE-OF EMAIL 6

1
:iJUPLICATE
.. OF EMAIL 6

2
' DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 6
~

3
 Email 11

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

She forwarded them to me -- I sent them to you too.

b5,
- - - ------ - -
---- ---

I thought it might If it's j u s t - th~n we don't need it.

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 9

1.
DUBLICATE OF EMAIL 9

2
 Email 12

Snow, Holly

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 1 :31 PM .
To: Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel; Snow, Holly; Bell, Mark
Subject: supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

Importance: High

In our report (p'. 5) we say-In addition to the Terrorist Watchlist screening, ICE uses a
Third Agency Check (TAC) to screen aliens from specially designated countries (SDCs) that have shown a tendency
to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or.their members (see appendix b for a list o~ b5
is getting calls about why Israel is included. -

Thanks
Anne

.)
 .... :
Email 13

Snow, Holly
From: Snow, Holly
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:02 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: ICE supervison of aliens commensurate with. risk

Absolute!)!:: Let me know if Y-OU need arjything,-=e=ls=e=·-------------,-------------

Holl_y Snow ·
Program Analyst
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Offi.ce .
(303)-bb) '
J3.o.~) (?ff.i~.~ L. ."' ..............:....,., ____ ,,_ . ,..__......_____·-·-:---------.....___:_. . _.-..._........... _._............ ---- ..
... ,,, :.. ... ,,~"

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 20111:56 PM
To: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel
Cc: Bell, Mark
Subject: FW: ICE supervison of aliens commensurate with risk

Thanks Holly

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:55 PM
To: Edwards, Charles; Manino, Yvonne·
Cc: Metelko; Marty; Bell, Mark;
Subject: ICE supervison of aliens commensurate with risk

Charles

The information below is directly from the summary workpaper supporting the report.

Thanks
Anne

... - ... ".

_ .... ..--- ..·::·
""'"'" ·-~- ._.__ -
.................................................................................. ............................................................................... -
From: Bell, Mark~
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:45 PM ·
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: here you go

1
 -r.\

b5,
b6

M.aJi :Bel£
DHS-OIG Office of Audit
Dep nt Inspector General for Audit
202- w
202- BB

2
 Email 14

Thind, Aneet
From: Bell, Mark·
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:47 PM
To: 'Pettersen, Sean'; Snow, Holly
Subject: FW: _here you go

What Anne is sending along.

DHS-OIG Office of Audit .

Deput .Assistant Inspector General for Audit
202- w
. 202 BB

From: Bell, Mark

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:45 PM
To: 'Richards, Anne' b5,
Subject: here you go
b6.
The - w a s provided by:·

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 13

1
 Email t5

Snow, Holly

From: Herman, Andrew

Sent: -49.PM
To:
Subject: · Re: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

Looking forward to seeing you also ... again Holly,

Take care -- Andrew

From: Snow, Holly mailto:

Sel'.lt: Frida Jul 01 2011 05:44 PM
To:
Subject: Re: ICE supervision.of aliens commensurate with risk

Thanks Andrew-Sean. shared the article, so I at least had a heads up when I gpt Anne's urgent request for a response for
the 51. That sure got my blood pumping! I shared everything we ~ad, so hopefully the Issue is resolved! What a· Friday!

I hope you have a great holiday! By the way I'm coming to Chicago the week of the 18th to join your training.- I look
· forward to seeing you and Marisa tool · .
Holly Snow · b6
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Den ffice
303- (bb)
303 (office)

To:
Subject: Re: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

Thanks Holly. I saw a lot of internet buzz yesterday about how I why Israel was included in the SDC list and forwarded
of
one the links to Sean. I meant to copy you also. .

Andrew

Subject: FW: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

From: Bell, Mark

.Sent: Friday, July 01, 20111:56 PM
To: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean
Subject: FW: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate.with risk

FYI

~[}Jell
DHS-OIG Office of Audit
1
Assistant Inspector General for Audit
BB] b6 .·
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 13

2
..---

• DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 13.

3
 Page 1of1
Email 16

...
From: Metelko, Marty
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201110:07 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: FW: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

Kelly: Just tried to reach yo1.1 but vm message stated I reached I hope I'm getting the info.
to the correct person our your way. We've been receiving calls from Israeli reporters asking how Israel was
placed on the "Specially Designated Countries" list. We've let reporters know that we received the list from IC
and it would be yo.Ur office-that-could-ar1-swe-r--the--questron~---- -------·----------

Here's the link to our report, OIG-11_.81 Supernsion of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG 11-81 Mayll.pdf b6

l just wanted to give you a quick "heads-up," as you may be receiving calls soon if you haven't had calls already.

Thanks.-Marty

Marta Rivera Metelko

Director,· Public Affairs
Office of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security
202.~. 1202
Fax: 202~

Thought the info. below would be helpful:

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 13

7/26/2011
 Page 1 of2
Email 17

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201111:31 AM
To: 'Gonzalez, Barbara'; Metelko, Marty
Cc: Hale, Brian P
Subject: RE: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

b6
Thanks- this is helpful.

Marta-R1veraMe~l~or-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Director, Public Affairs

Office of Inspector General
Department of Hom I ecurity
202. I 202.
Fax:202

Portion referred to ICE for review and

~~t~;.,~~~15~~~~::;1-~~---- --------] ,_._ _ _ _, "

~~--·
Cc:
Subject: FW: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

Hi Barbara: This is Marty Metelko from the DHS DIG. I just sent this to Kelly and received her "out of office." I
also left you a voicemail.

Let me know if there's anything you may need from me.-Marty

7/26/2011
 Page 2 of2

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 16

7/26/2011
 Email 18

Snow, Holly

From: Snow,· Holly .

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:17 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject:· Re: contents of official position

Thank you Anne!

Holly Snow
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office ·
303· (bb)
303- (office)

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 05:14 PM
To: Butler, Jewel; Pettersen; Sean; Snow, Holly; Bell, Mark; McCoy, John;
Subject: contents of official position .

If anyone contacts you or anyone in the Office of Audits about this re

Publi.c Affairs. However for our information only, here is

bS,
b6

Thanks,

Rick

Additionally, I would like to thank Holly for her quick response and commend the team for good indexing. It
was very helpful to get this information so quickly on the Friday before a holiday weekend.

1
 1 r,•

Thank you

Anne

'l

. 2
 Email 19

Snow, Holly
From: Herman, Andrew
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:23 PM
To:. Snow, Holly
Subject: Fw: Some internet buzz regarding the "Supervision" report

FYI- Andrew.
DUPLJ;CATE OF EMAIL 1

1
 Email 20

Thind, Aneet

From: Metelko, Marty .

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201110:58AM
To: ~
Cc: ._... b6
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

Thank you.

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201110:57 AM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: On being a "former" .....

Pursuant to discussion at staff meeting.

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 5:05 PM
To: Edwards, Charles
Cc: Richards, Anne; Metelko, Marty
Subject: On being a "former" .....

Note: in public discussions or comments to

Thanks,
Rick

1
 • t

Email 21

Thind, Aneet

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11 :56 AM
To: Doery, Richard
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

I hope you b5

From: Doery, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201111:26 AM
To: Reb.ack, Richard
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

This was so interesting to read about!

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July OS, 201111:17 AM
To: Doery, Richard
Subject: FW: On being a "former" .....

FYI
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 20 .

1
 '~UPLICATE OF EMAIL 20
i'

2
 Email 22

Thihd, Aneet

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:21 PM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

Thanks, RR

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 3:41 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....
Portion referred to ICE for review

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201110:57 AM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: On being a "former" .....

Pursuant to discussion at staff meeting.

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 20

1
 ·-· -- ------------- ---------·---

bUPLICATE OF EMAIL 20

2
 Email23

thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:50 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

Here is a brochure put together by AIPAC on US-Israeli Homeland Security Cooperation ...

http://www.aipac.orgZWhy%20lsraelf~Zmedia7Publications-ola7l'VfiWatecf%-WDocuments/Romelano-secrrrifi[.pdf

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:42 PM
To: Metelko, Ma ; Reback, Richard; Edwards, Charles
Cc: Bell, Mark; Butler, Jewel; Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean;
Subject: RE: On being a "former'..... · b5,
b6

Thanks
Anne

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Wednesday1July 06, 201112:22 PM
To: Reback, Richard· Edwards Charles
Cc: Richards, Anne;
Subject: RE: On being a "former" ......
Importance: High

ICE's Press Secretary just sent me the following:

Portion referred to ICE for review and direct response

1
 l Portion referred
Ito Ici for review
land direct
l response
J
Not sure but not sure we have any recourse.-Marty b5

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 2 0

2
 Email 24·

Thind, Aneet

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 20111:20 PM
To: Reback, Richard
Subject: Re: On being a "former''.....

-Don't know but they claim

.
Could also

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 01:04 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: On being a "former" .....

Is that true -

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 01:02 PM
To: Reback, Richard
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

b5,
From: Reback, Richard b6
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:56 PM
To: Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: RE: On being a "former".~ ...

Agree, but that's not reall ill actually - ·

- s u c h as
- e

~isedthat_ has suggested that and possibly

From: Rich~rds, Anne

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:48 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Edwards, Charles
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

Yes, but moving forward my concern is that

1
From: Re back, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:44 PM
To: Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

The language we proffered last night used b5

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 23

2
DUPL'ICATE OF EMAIL. 23

3
 Email 25

Thind, Aneet

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 5:17 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Eclwards Charle
Subject: additional support for b5'
Attachments: TAC Procedure Memo.pdf
b6

The memo attached quotes

DUP.JJJ.9A.1'~....9.f ... ~Ml'.\J..~ ......?..................................... ·······~···---····--····-···- ...............- ..._....................... ___ ............-..-.................................... .,.......................... ..

1
 2 PAGE(S)
Duplicate ICE Memo held in
the file. Memo was referred to
ICE with email no. 3
 Email 26.
Thind, Aneet
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11 :08 AM .
To: Bebow, Brooke;· Bell, Mark; Best, Alexander; B1,1tle·r, Jewel; John, Sandra; Johnson, Richard;
LaRouche, Roger; McCoy, John; O'Malley, Patrick; Siviy, Michael; Wood, Paul
Subject: FW: Media Week In.Review ·
Atta.chments: Media Week in Review- 07 05 11.doc

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 .11:07 AM
To: AlGs
Cc: Mccarron, William; b6
Subject: Media Week In Review

As promised:

SYNOPSIS
• The OIG was featured in a wide spectrum of outlets, from regional to national, including security and political
themed biogs. ·

KEY QUOTES
• None

TWITIERIBLOGS/ETC.
• Aviation Week: GAO Studies Security at GA Airports By Kerry Lynch
·• Jewish Telegraphic Agency: U.S. immigration includes Israel on watch list

PRESS COVERAGE

ICE
CNSNews, U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce, or Protect' Terrorists; Also Calls
Israel Anti-Terror Partner By ,Edwin Mora
June 29, 2011. In an implicit admission that Israel is so threatened by terrorism that it is not only surrounded by countries
and territories that produce terrorists but also unwillingly harbors terrorists within its own territory in a way that most other
nations in the world do not, the Obama administration is currently listing Israel among 36 "specially designated countries"
it believes "have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members.'~
*Also reposted in Fox News, Newsmax.com. .
World Tribune, On U.S. list of countries which 'promote, produce, or protect' terrorists: All of Middle East
July 1, 2011. WASHINGTON -The United States has deemed that the entire Middle East, including leading allies, were
harboring insurgents.

Project Shield . .
Chicago Sun-Times, Preckwinkle axes troubled 'Project Shield' By Carol Marin and Don Moseley
June 30, 2011. Seven years and $44 million questionably spent federal dollars later, Cook County Board President Toni
Preckwinkle on Thursday pulled the plug on "Project Shield," a failed Homeland Security program initiated and continued
by her two predecessors, John and Todd Stroger.
Chicago Tribune, Cook County scraps faulty policy car·camera program By Erikka Slife
June 30, 2011. Cook County officials on Thursday pulled the plug on a troubled $44 million effort that left faulty cameras
in police cars.

Examiner.com, Controversial post 9/11 program nixed By Cynthia Hodges ·

1
~;July 1, 2011. On Thursday, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkfe and Michael Masters, the new Cook County
Department of Homeland Security Chief announced a decision to can "Project Shield," a failed Homeland Security
program initiated under John Stroger.

'·

2
 - For Internal Use Only- -

,,
OIG Media Coverage
Week in Review: June 28- July 5, 2011

·SYNOPSIS
• The OIG was featured in a wide spectrum of outlets, from regional to national, including
security and political themed biogs.

KEY QUOTES.
• None

TWITTERIBLOGS/ETC.
• Aviation Week: GAO Studies Security at GA Airports By Kerry Lynch
• Jewish Telegraphic Agency: U.S. immigration includes Israel on watch list

PRESS COVERAGE

ICE.
CNSNews, U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce, or Protect'
Terrorists; Also Calls Israel Anti-Terror Partner !3Y Edwin Mora
June 29, 2011. In an implicit admission that Israel is so threatened by terrorism that it is not only
surrounded by countries and territories that produce terrorists but also unwillingly h_arbors
terrorists within its own territory in a way that most other nations in the world do not, the Obama
administration is currently listing Israel among 36 "specially designated countries" it believes
"have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members."
*Also reposted in Fox N~ws, Newsmax.com.
World Tribune, On U.S. list of countries which 'promote, produce, or protect' terrorists: All
of Middle East · ·
July 1, 2011. WASHINGTON.:...... The United States has deemed that the entire Middle East,
including leading allies, were harboring insurgents. . · ·

Pro/ect Shield
Chicago Sun-Times, Preckwinkle axes troubled 'Project Shield' By Carol Marin and Don
Moseley.
June 30, 2011. Seven years and $44 million questionably spent federal dollars later, Cook
County Boarc:I President Toni Preckwinkfe on Thursday pulled the plug on "Project Shield,'.' a
failed Homeland Security program initiated and continued by her two predecessors, John and
Todd Stroger.
Chicago Tribune, Cook County scraps faulty policy car camera program By Erikka Slife
June 30, 2011. Cook County officials on Thursday pulled the plug on a troubled $44 million effort
that left faulty cameras in· police cars. ·

Office of Public Affairs

 - For lnternai Use Only--
I·

OIG Media Coverage·

Week in Review: June. 28- July 5, 2011 ·

Examiner.com, Controversial post 9/11 program nixed By Cynthia Hodges .

July 1, 2011. On Thursday, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle and Michael
Masters, the newco·ok County Department of Homeland Security Chief announced a decision to
can "Project Shield," a faile.d Homeland Security program initiated under Joh.ri Stroger.

.Office of Public Affairs

 Email 27
,...J

Thind, Aneet

From: Howard, Linda

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:36 PM.
To: Richards, Anne ··
Subject:· Re: Media Week In Review

I will look. Well timed on someone's part. Hope this week is more calm.

--·----·--·----··-----------·.. ·-··--··.
From: Richards, Anne .
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201111:07 AM
To: Howard, Linda .
Subject: FW: Media Week In Review

Check out the articles on 'ICE - came from Sean's Supervision of Aliens.report. You all missed ·a· fun day on Friday

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 26

1
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 26

2
 Email 28

Thind, Aneet
From:. Metelko,·MartY
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 4:33 PM
To: Al Gs
Cc: Wojnarowski, Doris b6
Subject: Media Week in Review .
·Attachments: Media Week in Review- 07 05 11 to 07 11 11 Final.doc

OIG Media Coverage

Week in Review: July 5-11, 2011

SYNOPSIS
• ·The OIG was featured in local, regional·and special-interest outlets over the-past.week. Top stories include:
o Coverage of the inclusion of Israel on ICE's Third-:-Agency Check (TAC) list, which was in our report OIG-
11-81 "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk"
· o ICE Port Isabel Detention Officer indictment
o DHS critical infrastructure vulnerabilities

• Featured Reports
o OIG-11-81 "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk"
o OIG-11-89 "Planning, Management,. and Systems Issues Hinder DHS' Efforts To Protect Cyberspace and
the Nation's Cyber Infrastructure (Redacted)"
o DA-11-18 "City of Vero Beach, Florida -Disaster. Activities Related to Hurricane Jeanne"
o DA-11-19 "City of Vero Beach, Florida -Disaster Activities Related to Hurricane Frances"

KEY QUOTES
• · ."'Configuration and account access vulnerabilities identified on the [two] systems must be mitigated to manage
and secure the systems and PCll data from the risks associated with internal and external threats, unauthorized ·
access and misuse,' Frank W. Deffer, Assistant Inspector General for information Technology Audits, wrote in the
report." -Aliya Sternstein, NextGov

• '"The addition of Israel in.the OIG's list of ICE's 'Third-Agency Checks' (TAC) was based on inaccurate
information provided to the OIG during the course of its audit,' Morton said in a statement sent by e-niail to JTA.•
-Ron Kampeas, JTA .

• "But an inspector general report found that the agency did not use unfair or illegal political practices when
releasing FOIA requests. And in the end, the investigation produced more sizzle - Issa said the FOIA process
'reeks of a Nixonian enemies list' - than substance." -Jordy Yager, The Hilr

- --- --- JWJTTERIBLOGS/Erc.

• · Eurasia Review: Israel Included On US Homeland Security Terrorism Watch List - OpEd Posted by Lizza
Ratn_er . ·
• National Defense: OHS Cybers.ecurity Database Has Its Own Vulnerabilities, IG Reports Posted by Stew
Magnuson · . . . ·
• PJ Taller: Homeland Security: Sorry about putting Israel on the terror watch list Posted by Bryan
Preston . .
• Security Dark Reading via Twitter: Reports: OHS; IRS Databases At Risk Posted by Ericka Chickowski
• The Blaze: Update: Homeland Security Dept. Now Claims Israel Was Erroneously Included on Terror List
Posted by Billy Hallowell
• TownHall: Update: Homeland Security Dept. Now Claims Israel Was Erroneously Included on Terror List
Posted by Billy Hallowell . ·· · . ·
• TransWorld News: Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Inspector Sentenced For Narcotics Trafficking

PRESS COVERAGE

CBP Border Corruption

1
 • Global Post, US goes after agents who moonlight for Mexican cartels By loan Grillo · ·
July 10, 2011. MEXICO CITY,.Mexico -The story splattered across Mexican·newspapers looked painfully familiar- a
government official was found guilty of betraying the trust of the public and moonlighting for the drug cartels that have torn
this country apart. . . · .

DHS Critical Infrastructure Efforts ..

lnfoSecurity·, OHS falls short on protecting critical infrastructure database, says Inspector General
July 8, 2011. The Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General (IG) found security gaps in the
department's database containing information on US critical infrastructure. The IG said that there were significant flaws in ·
access controls for the sensitive database, called the protected critical infrastructure information·(PCll) system, which
contains security reviews of US Critical infrastructure.

NextGov, IG: Homeland Security system flaws stymie ability to secure cyberspace By Allya Sternsteln
July 7, 2011. A federal inspection has uncovered weaknesses in Homeland Security Department systems that house
information regarding critical U.S. networks. ·

DHS FOIA Practices

The Hill, Issa: We could have done better By Jordy Yager
.July 7, 2011. When he became chairman of the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committe~ six
months ago, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) was gangbusters to go after waste and corruption in the federal government.

FEMA
Gulf Coast News, Gautier Woman Pleads Guilty to Katrina Fraud
July 8, 2011. GULFPORT, Miss. - Demonica L. Rogers, age 35, of Gautier, MS, pied guilty in U.S. District Court on. July
6, 2011, to theft of federal disaster funds of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); for Hurricane Katrina
benefits, U.S. Attorney John Dowdy announced.

Vero Beach News, After the hurricanes, Vero's paperwork disaster By Lisa Zahner
July 7, 2011. When federal auditors came to town to peer into the City of Vero Beach's handling of expense
reimbursements related to hurricanes Frances and Jeanne, the staff said there was nothing to worry about.

ICE
· KRGV, Former Port lsabei Detention Officer Charged With Violating Civil Rights of Detainee
July 8, 2011. BROWNSVILLE; TX -A McAllen grand jury indicted a former Port Isabel Detention Center officer with using
excessive force on a detainee, obstruction of justice and lying to a federal agent. The federal indictment was unsealed
after Raul Leal was arrested today.

The Brownsville Herald, Former detention center guard accused of abuse By Jacqueline Armendariz .
July 8, 2011. A former Harlingen man who was a lieutenant at the Port Isabel Detention Center was arrested Friday and
accused ofabusing an inmate, then attempting to cover it up, the U.S. Attorney's Office announced.

The Examiner, Former Port Isabel Detention Officer Charged with Violating Civll Rights of Detainee By Breck
Porter
July 8, 2011. WASHINGTON -A federal indictment returned by a McAllen, Texas, grand jury on June 7, 2011, charging
-~-former Port Isabel Detention Center Lieutenant Raul Leal with using excessive force on a detainee, obstruction of justice --- -- -- - --
and lying to a federal agent was unsealed today following Leal's arrest, the Justice Department announced.

The Houston Chronicle, Former detention center supervisor arrested By The Associated Press
July 8, 2011. BROWNSVILLE, TX - Federal agents have arrested a former supeniisor at a South Texas immigrant
detention center on charges of excessive force, obstruction of justice and lyirig to a federal agent about the 2009 beating
of a detainee.
*Also fe~tured on the ABC 13.com (Houston ABC affiliate) website.

YNet News, US: Israel i.ncluded in terror watch list by mistake By Yitzhak Benhorin
July 7, 2011. WASHINGTON - Israeli diplomats stationed in .the United States was surprised to discover that Israel was
one of 36 countries included in a new Homela~d Security terror watch list. ·

israel Today, Israel added to US terror watch list By Ryan Jones .

July 6, 2011. Israel was recently ·added to the US Department of Homeland Security terror watch list. The revised list of
36 nations was attached to a May·10 doc.ument from the office of the Homeland Security Inspector General. Israel's ·
inclusion was picked up on last week by CNS News.
2
JTA, U.S. says Israel's inclusion on terrorist watch list was a mistake By Ron Kampeas
July 6, 2011. WASHINGTON (JTA)-- Israel was inbluded erroneously on a U.S. Departmeht of Homeland Security
terrorist watch list, a U.S. official said. ·
*Also featured on the Cleveland
. Jewish News website
. and JewishJourhal.com.
' ..

The Algemeiner, US: Israel Inclusion on Terror List Was a Mistake By Maxine Devere .
July 6; 2011. In a communique received by the AlgemeinerWednesday, July 7, Immigrations and Customs E:nforcement
(ICE) director John Morton said that the addition of Israel in the OIG's fist of ICE's Third-Agency Checks was a mistake.

Please contact me should you have questions.-Marty

Marta Rivera Metelko

Director, Public Affairs
Office of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security
202.~ b6
Fax: 2 0 2 . - - -

3
 - F<:>r Internal Use Only -

DIG.Media Coverage
Week iri Review: July 5-11, 2011 ·

SYNOPSIS
• The OIG was featured in local, regional and special-interest outlets over the past week.
Top stories include:
o Coverage of the inclusion of Israel on ICE's Third-Agency Check (TAC) list,
which was in our report OIG-11-81 "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with
Risk"
o ICE Port Isabel Detention Officer indictment
o OHS critical infrastructure vulnerabilities

· • Featured Reports
o OlG-11-81 "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk"
o OIG-11-89 "Planning, Manageiment, and Systems Issues Hinder OHS' Efforts To
Protect Cyberspace and the Nation's Cyber Infrastructure (Redacted)" ·
o DA-11-18 "City of Vero.Beach, Flonda -Disaster Activities Related to Hurricane
Jeanne;' · · · ·
o DA-11-19 "City of Vero Beach, Florida -Disaster Activities Related to Hurricane
Frances" ·

·KEY QUOTES
• '"Configuration and account access vulnerabilities ictentified on the [two] systems must be
mitigated to manage and secure the systems and PCll data from the risks associated
with internal and external threats, unauthorized access and misuse,' Frank W. Deffer,
Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audits, wrote in the report."
-Aliya Sternstein, NextGov ·

• "'The addition of lsraef in the OIG's list of ICE's 'Third-Agency Checks' (TAC) was based
on inaccurate information provided to the OIG during the course of its audit,' Morton said
in a statement sent by e-mail to JTA" -Ron Kampeas, JTA ·
• "But an inspector general report found that the agency did not use unfair or illegal political
practices when.releasing FOIA requests. And in the end, the investigation produced more
sizzle - Issa said the FOIA process 'ree.ks of a Nixonian enemies list' - than
substance." -Jordy Yager, The Hill·

TWITTERIBLOGS/ETC.
• Eurasia Review: Israel Included On US Homeland Security Terrorism Watch List -
OpEd Posted by Lizza Ratner ·
• National Defense: OHS Cybersecurity Database Has Its Own Vulnerabilities, IG.
·Reports Posted by Stew Magnuson _
• PJ Tatler: Homefand Security: Sorry about putting Israel on the terror watch list
Posted by Bryan Preston
• Security Dark Reading via Twitter: Reports: OHS, IRS Databases At Risk Posted by
Ericka Chick~wski · ·
• · The Blaze: Update: Homeland Security Dept. Now Claims Israel Was Erroneously
Included on Terror List Posted by Billy Hallowell
• TownHall: Update: Homeland Security Dept. Now Claims Israel Was Erroneously
Included on Terror List Posted by Billy Hallowell
• TransWorld News: Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Inspector Sentenced For
·Narcotics Trafficking

Office of Public Affairs

 - For Internal Use Only-

OIG Media C9verage

Week in Review: July 5-11, 2011

PRESS COVERAGE

CBP Border Corruption

Global Post, US goes after agents who moonlight for Mexican cartels By loan Grillo
July 10, 2011'. MEXICO CITY, Mexico -The story splattered across Mexican newspapers
· looked painfully familiar - a government official was found guilty of betraying the trust of the ·
public and moonlighting for the drug cartels that have torn this country apart. ·

DHS Critical Infrastructure Efforts

lnfoSecurity, OHS falls·short on· protecting critical infrastructure database, says Inspector
General ·
July 8, 2011. The Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General (IG) found
security gaps in the department's database containing information on US critical infrastructure.
The IG said that there were significant flaws in access controls for the sensitive database, called
the protected critical infrastructure information (PCll) system, which contains security reviews·of
US critical infrastructure.

NextGov, IG: Homeland Security system flaws stymie ability to secure· cyberspace By
Aliya Sternstein
July 7, 2011. A federal inspection has uncovered weaknesses in Homeland Security Department
systems that house information regarding critical U.S. networks.

DHS FOIA Practices

The Hill, Issa: We could have done better By Jordy Yager
July 7, 2011. When he became chairman of the powerful House Oversight and Government·
Reform Committee six months ago, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) was gangbusters to go after waste ·
---------and corruption in the federal government --·--------·--------- -----------

FEMA
Gulf Coast News, Gautier Woman Pleads Guilty to Katrina Fraud
July 8, 2011. GULFPORT, Miss: - Demonica L. Rogers, age 35, of Gautier, MS, pied guilty in
U.S. District Court on July 6, 2011, to theft of federal disaster funds of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), for Hurricane Katrina benefits, U.S. Attorney John Dowdy
announced.

Vero Beach News, After the hurricanes. Vero's paperwork disaster By Lisa Zahner

Office of Public Affairs

 - For Internal Use Only-

OIG .Media Coverage .

Week in Review: July 5-11, 2011

July 7, 2011. When federal auditors came to town to peer into the City of Vero Beach's handling
of expense reimbursements related to hurricanes Frances and Jeanne, the staff said there was
nothing to worry about.

ICE
KRGV, Former P·ort Isabel Detention Officer Charged With Violating Civil Rights of
Detainee
. .
July 8, 2011. BROWNSVILLE, TX -A McAllen grand jury indicted a former Port Isabel Detention
Center officer wi.th using excessive force on a detainee, obstruction of justice and lying to a
federal agent. The federal indictment was unsealed after Raul Leal was arreste~ today.

The Brownsville Herald, Former detention center guard accused of abuse By Jacqueline
Armendariz
. .
. July 8, 2011. A former Harlingen man Who was .a lieutenant at the Port Isabel Detention Center
was arrested Friday and accused of abusing an inmate, then attempting to cover it up, the U.S.
Attorney's Office announced. · ·

The Examiner, Former Port Isabel Detention Officer Charged with Violating Civil Rights of
Detainee By Breck Porter
- July 8, 2011. WASHINGTON -A federal indictment returned by a McAllen, Texas, grand jury on
June 7, 2011, charging former Port Isabel Detention Center Lieutenant Raul Leal with using
excessive force on a detainee,. obstruction of justice and lying to a federal agent was unsealed
today following Leal's arrest, the· Justice Department anl']ounced. ·

·The Houston Chronicle, Former detention center supervisor arrested By The Associated
Press . . .
July 8, 2011. BROWNSVILLE, TX- Federal agents have arrested a former supervisor at a
South Texas immigrant detention center on charges of excessive force, obstruction of justice and
lying to a federal agent about the 2009 beating of a detainee. ·
*Also featured on the ABC 13.com (Houston ABC affiliate) website.

YNet News, US: Israel included in terror watch list by mistake By Yitzhak Benhorin
July 7, 2011.WASHING°fON- Israeli diplomats stationed in the U_nited States was surprised to
discover that Israel was· one of 36 countries included in a new Homeland Security terror watch
list.

Israel Today, Israel added to US terror watch list By Ryan Jones

July 6, 2011. Israel was recently added to the US Departmen_t of Homeland Secu_rity terror watch

Office of Public Affairs

 - For lr:iternal Use Only -

OIG Media Coverage

Week in Review: July 5.-11, 2011

list. The revised list of 36 nations was attached to a May 1o document from the office of the
Homeland Security Inspector General: Israel's inclusion was picked up on last week by CNS
News. ·

.JTA, U.S. says Israel's inclusion on terrorist watch list was a mistake By Ron Kampeas
July 6, 2011. WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Israel was included erroneously on a U.S. Department of
Homeland Security terrorist watch list, a U.S. official said. ·
*Also featured on the Cleveland Jewish News website and JewishJournal.com.

The Algemelner, US: Israel Inclusion on Te·rror List Was a Mistake By Maxine Devere
July 6, 2011. In a communique received by the AlgemeinerWednesday, July 7, Immigrations and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) director John Mortori said that the addition of Israel in the OIG's list
of ICE's Third~Agency Checks was a mistake. · ·

Office of Public Affairs

 Email 29

· Thind, Aneet
From: Bell, Mark
Sent:· ~2PM
To:
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this'

Agreed

Butler, Jewel

Subject: Fw: Let me on this

. •hought are that

bS,
What are your thoughts? b6
-Original M~ssage ----~·
From: Edwa~ds, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, ·July 05, 2011 08:55 PM
To: Richards, Anne; Reba~kJ Richard
Subject: Let me know your thoughts on this

.lllis plan~se this and what to know

following~ ·

1
 Email 30

Thind, Aneet
From: Reback, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:09 PM
To: Richards, Anne ·
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

I know. Clearly, the end is near!

----- Original Message -----
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:06 PM
To: Reback, Richard
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this
Two minds thinking alike
Very scary

Original Message -----

From: Reback, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:04 PM
To: Edwards, Charles; Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

What if b5

1
 Email 31

Thind, Aneet

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:20. PM
To: Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Original Message -----

From: Edwards, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:17 PM b5
To: Reback, Richard; Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Original Message -----

From: Reback, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011. 09:12 PM
To: Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

just imagine if it actually had been the oig's mistake!

Original Message -----

From: Edwards, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:11 PM·
To: Reback, Richard
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Thanks Rick. This has caused me such a huge headache I can't even begin to explain ....

Original Message -----

From: Reback, Richard
Sent: Tuesday~ July 05, 2011 09:07 PM
To: Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Just got in.

Original Message
From: Edwards, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:05 PM
To: Reback, Richard
·---subject:- Re: Let me know your thoughts on this
Okay, I called your home a few minutes ago.
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 30

1
DUPLitCATE OF EMAIL 30

2
. .
Email 32

Thind, Aneet

From: Richards, Anne ·

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:21 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

iiii'.might also want to add that

Original Message -----

From: Reback, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:17 PM
To: Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Or

Original Message -----

From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201f 09:13 PM
To: Reback, ·Richard; Edwards, Charles; Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Charle
Ifthe

Original Message -----

From: Reback, Richard b5
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:09 PM
To:·Edwards, Charles; Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let me.know your thoughts on this

Yes

Original Message -----

From: Edwards, Ch~rles
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:08 PM
To: Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles; Reback, Richard
Subject: Re:. Let me know your thoughts on this

Thanks Anne ...

Original Message
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:06 PM
To: Edwards, Charles; Reback, Richard
Subject:.Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Charles
I'm concerned that I propose that
1
 b5

Thanks
Anne

.DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 29

2
 h. Email 33

Thind, Aneet

From: . Bell, Mark

Sent: . Tuesdalif 05, 20119:45 P~
To:
· Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Good job! b6

----- Or.iginal Message --~-­

From: Richards, Anne mailto:
·sent~201109:39 PM
To:·-----
Subject: Fw: Let me know your thoughts on this

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 32

1
2
 .-:.·
Email 34

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:49 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

Yep! Will anxiously await to see the statement.

Sent from my ~lackBerry

~--~~ Original Message -----

From: Richards, Anne
Se~t~ 2011 09:46 PM
Tu.~.
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this
I hope
_:._ ___ ~"."-"'

From: . . . . _ . . . . . .
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:46 PM
· To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let·me know your thoughts on this b5,
b6

Sent from my BlackBerry

----- Original Message -----

From: Richards, Anne
Sent~ 2011 09:42 PM
To:~
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

I agree. But its out of my hands.

-----~---
From:~
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:40 PM
To: Richards, ·Anne
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

~geis
- - s o l gu
think we need to

·Sent from my BlackBerry

1
 •· Original Message -----
From: Richards, Anne
Sen~ 2011 09:35 PM
To:---
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this
Thanks·
But apparently the
.I don't know if

I will.prov1de an update if I get ohe

Thanks
Anne

bSi'
-----~--- b6
From: ~ ·
Sent:· Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09.:32 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this .

Sent from my BlackBerry

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 29

2
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 29

3
 Email 35

Thind, Aneet

From: Butler, Jewel ·

Sent: · Wednesday, July 06, 2011 7:01 AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Let me know your thoughts on this

They
that
Jewel L. Butler
DUPLICATE OF MAIL 29

1
 Email 36

Snow, Holly
From:· Snow, Holly
Sent: ·. Wednesday, July 06, 2011 7:58 AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: Let me know your thoughts on this

Oh that is

Holly Snow bS,

Program Analyst b6·
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
(303)-(bbj
(303)-office)
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 29

1
 Email 37

Thind, Aneet

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 20111:21 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Edwards, Charles; Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Audit Memo

I'm betting

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 01:07 PM
To: Edwards, Charles;. Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Audit Memo

I am betting that

From: Edwards, Charles

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 01:05 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne
Subject: FW: Audit Memo·

Here is my email that I sent in March to John Morton.

b5

From: Edwards, Charles

Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 2:13 PM
To: Morton, John
Subject: Audit Memo

Hi John,

Per our conversation last week, I wanted to touch base with you to let
OHS OIG Office of Audits

- e attached the draft report

- Any assistance you can give in regards to this matter is greatly appreciated.

If you need additional information, ple_ase let me know.

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Charles I<. Edwards

Acting Inspector General
Office 6.f Inspector General
Dept Of Homeland Security

1
 From:
Sent:
To:
iiiiilll
Metelko, Marty
06, 2011 2:23 PM

Subject: RE: JTA Article: Israel's inclusion on terrorist watch list was a mistake
b6
Interesting.

From:
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 20111:50 PM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: JTA Article: Israel's inclusion on terrorist watch list was a mistake

An interesting update- per our previous conversation. According to the original post below (included in our
Media Review) and reaffirmed in the post today, it appears that the issue first appeared in an article I flagged on
Thursday- CNS News.

Israel's inclusion on terrorist watch list was a mistake

By Ron Kampeas ·July 6, 2011

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Israel was included erroneously on a U.S. Department of Homeland Security terrorist
watch list, a U.S. official said.

Gillian Christiansen, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement division of the
department, said Israel's recent appearance on a list compiled by the department's office of the inspector
general was a mistake.

"The addition of Israel in the OIG's list of ICE.'s 'Third-Agency Checks' (TAC) was based on inaccurate information
provided to the OIG during the course of its audit," Christiansen said in a statement sent by e-mail to JTA. "The
U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in our
efforts to combat global terrorism. The United States maintains close ihtelligence-sharing relationships with
Israel in order to address security issues within its own borders and in our mutual pursuit of safety and security
around the globe."

The list does not fault government policies and instead recognizes the likelihood that a suspect traveler from
that country might have terrorist ties.

If a traveler from one of the countries is detained, the country's inclusion on the list triggers a special check by
Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The list, attached to a May 10 document from the DHS Inspector General's office, was reported last week by CNS
News, a conservative news service.

The list of 36 nations includes a number of other close U.S. allies such as Turkey, Bahrain, Morocco and
Philippines, as well as nations beset by internal fighting like Sudan and Somalia.

JTA's original article-

U.S. immigration includes Israel on watch list
July 1, 2011

WASHINGTON. (JTA) -- Israel is on a list .compiled by U.S. immigration authorities of countries that might harbor

7/26/2011
. -·--· --.--- ~-

Page 2 of2

·terrorists.

The Department of Homeland Security list of 36 nations does not fault government policies and instead
recognizes the likelihood that a suspect traveler from ~hat country might have terrorist ties.

If a traveler from o.ne of the countries is detained, the country's inclusion on the list triggers a special check by
the Immigration and Customs Enforcement division.

The list, attached to a May 10 document from the DHS Inspector General's office, was first reported this week by
CNS News,. a conservativ·e news service.

An ICE spokeswoman, Gillian Christensen, told CNS that appearing on the list did not suggest a country backs\ I

terrorism.

"The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in
our efforts to combat global terrorism," Chris.tensen said. "Countries may have been included on the list because
of the backgrounds of arrestees, not because of the country's government itself. The United States maintains
close intelligence-sharing relationships with many of these countries in order to address security issues within
their own borders and in our mutual pursuit of safety and security around the globe."

The list includes a number of other close U.S. allies, like Turkey, Bahrain, Morocco and Philippines, as well as
nations beset by internal fighting, like Sudan and Somalia.

7/26/2011
 ..,
Email 39

Snow, Holly

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:45 PM
To: Snow, Holly ·
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks :..

Personally, f think But, what do I know.

AgaJn
.Thanks for your help.
b5
From: Snow, Holly
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:46 PM
To: Richards, Anne ·
Subj~ct: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

-babl~ I am surprised that

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:24 PM
To: Snow, Holly ·
Cc: Pettersen, Sean; Butler; Jewel
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

[ HOii · Portici!l. referred to ICE

Thanks for your help

Anne

---··-·-------·-----·---·--------·-----
From: Snow, Holly
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 20114:25 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Cc: Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Holl_ySnow
Program Analyst
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
1
 From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 i:ss·PM
To: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean
Cc: Butler, Jewel .
Subject: FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks
Importance: High

Do we know when See email below.

Thanks
Anne

. --·----~---·
From: - ·---.
· -
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:46 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks b5,
Importance: High i ·
b6
Anne,

Will you pfeas·e help. me a

b · 't°dfokno~ . . . . .
. Fors.ome reason,
THANK YOU ..
-

From: Kaguyutan, Janice inall o

~~~t: Thursdaf July 07, 2011 3:33 PM

Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Let me clarify. I just heard back from

-But,

From: mailto:
. Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:29 PM
To: Kaguyutan, Janice·
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

. Got it. Let me see what I can find out for you. Will be in touch.

From: Kaguyutan, Janice mall

Sen~29PM
Tu:~ ..
51.,tbject: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Hi - - Thanks for taking my call. M

In other words,
info!

Janice
2
Janice V. Kaguyuti:m
Deputy Chief Counsel
Democratic Staff . .
Howard L. Berman, Ranking Member
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
{202) 226-8467.

THE INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE 15 CONFIDENTIAL. This email.message, including any attachment, contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the named and intended recipient, or have had this email or
an attachment forwarded to you, you are not to read it or any attachment, are prohibited from disseminating and/or copying it,
should call us· immediately at 202-226-8467, and delete it and any attaehrrient from your system. ·

3
 Email 40

Thind, Aneet
. From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:45 PM
"To:· Edwards, Charles
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81. Third Agency Checks

Will do.

From: Edwards, Charles .

Sen~, 20113:44.PM
To:----
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Yes forward it to Anne. Please send me her response.

Charles K. Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of inspector General b6
Department of Homeland Security

·-----Ori~
From:---.
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 03:29 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Edwards, Charles
Cc: Manino, Yvonne
Subject: FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Chedcs

Hi Charles,

Below is related to the press on Israel. Should I forward this to a1:1dits?

Thanks, .

~ DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

1
,/DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

2
 ' .
Email 41

Thind, Aneet

From: b6
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:55 PM
To: Richards, Anne ·
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

THANKS. Let me know either way please.

From: Richards, Anne

Sen~, 20'11 3:53 PM
To:---
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

·Anne

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

1
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39
J ~ ..._ • •

2
,,...; Email 42

Thind, Aneet

From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 201.1 4:50 PM.
To: Edwards, Charles ·
Cc: Manino, Yvonne
Subject: FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks
Attachments: TAC.pdf

. .
Charles, below is Anne's response. Also, please see attached. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. b6

•
From: Richards,
Sen~, 20114:29 PM
To:---
Amie

Subject: PN: OIG-11:·81 Third·Agency Checks

b6 Portion ref erred to ICE for. review and direct

Thanks
Anne

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39
DUPLICATE ·OF EMAIL 39

2
,DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

3
 3 PAGE(S)

Referred to I CE for processing

and response to the requester
 Email 43

Thind, Aneet
From:. b6
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 5:17 PM
To: . . Reback, Richard
Subject:. FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Charles called to tell us he will be calling ICE's 2"d in command tomorrow around 9 AM. He would like us to be ready to
participate or be filled in right after.
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

1
 Email 44
Thind, Aneet

From:
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:28 AM
To: Edwards, Charles; Reback, Richard
Subject: FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Please see below-from Janice Berman's staffer.

From: Kaguyutan; Janice mailto

Sen~ll 9:28 AM
To:-.......-
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

ifFaW~tI9·l!!:r:::~~;:~r~] m?v:~1t~!:f9'Ar~ r~n&€[s~ImY:~!§sft~~~~~sr:~,ru:a11::~1~·~~~·~f~..~:rrR~}t?J:~:r9~~~1:rsg;;1:a11t~~!~l[t~:ff~1s~~~Ja1,,~~~~~iq::fh'~;

1 1

From: mailto
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:24 AM
To: Kaguyutan, Janice
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks b6

Good Morning, Janice,

My boss, Acting IG, Charles Edwards informed me this morning that JCE provided you with the information you
requested yesterday evening. lfthere is anything else we can help you with please let know. us

-
Have a nice weekend.

F rom: Kaguyutan, Janice mailto:

Sen~ 2011 6:03 PM
To:-----
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Thanks-

From: mailto
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 5:06 PM
To: Kaguyutan, Janice
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Janice, we are working on this. Will try to get back to you tomorrow.
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

1
DUPLIG~TE OF EMAIL 39

2
 Email 45

· Thind, Aneet

From:. . McCoy, John .

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:21 AM
To: Richards, Anne
, Subject: RE: Re-post OIG report

. Anne,

Thank you -- John

From: Richards, Aline

Sent: Friday, July OB, 201110:00 AM . .
To: Reback, Richard; ~ · ·
Cc: Edwards, C h a r l e s ; - Manino, Yvonne; Gramlan, Nikki; McCoy, John; Bell, Mark; Butler, Jewel;
Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean
Subject: RE: Re-post OIG report

Rick

· We are in the process of

I suggest for I'm very concerned that

-indicates that My suggested changes:

bS,
b6

I think

. Thanks
Anne

From: Repack, Richard

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:40 AM
To: Richards, Anne; M e -Ma elko ·
Cc: Edwards, Charles; Manino, Yvonne; Gramian, Nikki
Subject: Re-post OIG report

Anne, Marty,

1
perhaps something like the following:

Thoughts? Pis edit freely.

Thanks, ·
Rick

2
 Email 46

Snow, Holly
From: Reback, .Richard
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:38 AM
To: Richards, Amie; Metelko Ma
.Cc: Edwards, Charles; Gramian, Nikki; McCoy,
John; Bell, Mark; Butler, Jewel; Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean
Subject: Re: Re-post OIG report

I defer. I am

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:32 AM ·
To: Reback, Richard; ~ .
Cc: :Edwards, Charles; - - - Manino, Yvonne Gramian, Nikki; McCoy; John;
Bell, Mark; Butler, Jewel; Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean
Subject: RE: Re-post OIG report·

Rick

I understand that you were but it is important

How about:

I'm fine with the designation-

However, I too will

Anne

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Friday, July 08, 201110:28 AM ·
.To: Richards, Anne; M~ . . . ·
Cc: Edwards, Charles;~ Manino, Yvonne; Gramian, Nikki; McCoy, John; Bell, Mark; Butler, Jewel;
Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean ·
Subject: RE: Re-post OIG report

Anne,

1
 To avoid any confusion,
follows:·

And, the report is designated a s - o n the cover _rather than

I don't r~ally see but defer to others. ·

Thanks,

Rick
DUPLICATE OF. EMAIL 45

2
~ DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 45

3
.•
Email 47

Thind, Aneet

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:38 AM
To: Manino, Yvonne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: . Re: Re-post OIG report

Fine with me. RR

From: Manino, Yvonne

-·Sent: Friday, July 08, 201110:35 AM
To: Edwards, Charles
Cc: Reback, Richard
Subject: FW: Re-post OIG report

Charles,

This is the whole statement.

b5,
Thanks, b6

Yvonne Sy Manino
Acting Chief ofStaff
DHS 0 the Inspector General
(Office)
Mobile)
Fax

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 46

1
DUPLI~ATE OF EMAIL 46

2
D~PL~CATE OF EMAIL 46

----------- ---·------ --------

·--~---------~----·

3
 ..
,
..... ...
Email 48

Thind, Aneet

From:
Sent:
To:
. . . .2011 9:17 AM -j b6
Subject: Check out this article

Terror watch listlCE chief: Israel's inclusion on terror wat.ch list a "mistake"
Published 8 July 2011

DHS officials are now saying Israel's Inclusion on a list of countries that promote, produce, or protect terrorists was a mistake; John Morton, director of the U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), said, ''The addition of Israel to the list-- was based on inaccurate information provided to the OIG during the course
of its audit"; a May 2011 report contained an appendix which lists "specially designated countries" that promote terrorism; the list instructed ICE agents to pay
special attention to, and investigate more thoroughly, individuals from these countries arrested by ICE; ICE spokesperson suggested that Israel was included not
because its government supports terrorism, but because some individual Israelis do pose a terror threat; 1.5 million of Israel's 7.5 million citizens are Arabs

ICE admits error in classifying Israel II Source: theodoresworld.net

DHS officials are now saying Israel's inclusion on a list of countries that were promoting, producing, or protecting terrorists was a mistake.

''The addition of Israel to the list... was based on Inaccurate Information provided to the OIG during the course of Its audit," said John Morton, director of the U.S.
Immigration .arid Customs Enforcement (ICE). ''The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to terrorism, but rather they ere a partner in our
efforts to combat global terrorism. "The United States maintains close Intelligence-sharing relationships with Israel In order to address security issues within its own
borders and in our mutual pursuit of safety. and security around the globe; he added.

The remarks come in response to a May 2011 report titled "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk" contained an appendix which lists "specially
designated countries" that promote terrorism. Thirty-six countries were listed in addition to Israel including Turkey, Bahrain, Morocco, and the Philippines.

Of the thirty-six countries listed, only five did not have a majority Muslim population.

At the time of the report's release, Ice spokesperson Gillian Christensen said that countries could have been included on the list because of the backgrounds of
t~elr arrestees not the country's government itself.

Christensen added that the list was not necessarily a reflection of a government's policies but rather the possibility that Individuals originating from that country
could have terrorist ties .

•
• Email to a friend

b6
1
Congressional Liaison
Department of Homeland Security
Office of Ins ector General
202 irect
b6
202 cell

2
 ,.
Email 49

Thind, Aneet

From:
Sent: ~9:17AM
To:.
Subject: RE: Israel off terror list I DoT approves flying car I Trapped couple's hotel bi

thank you! It's an interesting story to watch- it just amazes me how quickly this erupted. Appreciate the heads up! ·

From:
.~:~iillli' 2011 9:16 AM
b6

Subject: FW: Israel off terror list I DoT approves flying car I Trapped couple's hotel bi.

Making sure you see this.

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:12 AM .. .
. To: Edwards, Charles; Manino, Yvonne; Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: Israel off terror list I DoT approves flying car I Trapped couple's hotel bi

See first story; DHS press release is now being picked up. RR

·-··:··--··-.:..·-········-·······-·-·--·--·--·---···--------~--,---·-· ·-·-------····---·---···-··-----·····-·----···
From: Homeland Security Newswire [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Homeland
Security Newswire · ·
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:00 AM .
To: Reback, Richard .
.Subject: Israel off terror list I DoT approves flying car I Trapped couple's hotel bi

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

Vol. 5, no. 155, Friday; 8 July 20

Today's Issue

1
 rror watch list
: chief: Israel's inclusion on terror watch list a "mistake"
S officials are now saying Israel's inclusion on a list of countries that promote, produce, or
tect terrorists was a mistake; John Morton, director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs
'orcement (ICE), said, "The addition of Israel to the list- was based on inaccurate
1rmation provided to the OIG during the.course of its audit"; a May-2011 report contained
appendix which lists "specially designated countries" that promote terrorism; the list
tructed ICE agents to pay special attention to, and investigate more thoroughly, individuals
n these countries arrested by ICE; ICE spokesperson suggested that Israel was included
because its government supports terrorism, but because some individual Israelis do pose
mor threat; 1.5 million of Israel's 7.5 million citizens are Arabs
ad more

'ing cars
irst: Flying car cleared for road . .
; U.S. Department of Transportation gave Massachusetts-based Terrafugia tWo important
imptions which would allow the company to offer its flying car - the Transition - to •
itomers next year; the exemptions allow the company to use differenttires and different
1inated protective glass, and come on top of a 110 lb. allowance the FAA gave the
npany last year; these allowance and exemptions mean the flying car Will not be treated
plane by the FAA, and those who fly it will not have to obtain a pilot license
ad more

botics/search and rescue

virig robot can rescue people, detonate bombs
rtheastf!m University student-researchers have created a roving robot that can locate and
cue victims of natural disasters or participate in military missions that are too dangerous ·
soldiers; students created a ·complex algorithm that would enable the robot to locate
>pie - or even bombs that are detonated through mobile phones
ad more

iation security
). and Kenya open talks to resume direct flights .
! United States is resuming talks with Kenya to discuss the reopening of direct flights
ween the two countries; due to fears of terrorism from neighboring Somalia, in September
l9 U.S. officials cancelled a Delta Airlines flight just hours before the fully-booked plane
s schedule to depart; the flight would have been the first direct link between the two
mtries since the late 1980s
ad more

idemics
tural antibody brings universal flu vaccine closer
iually changing flu vaccines with their hit-and-miss effectiveness may soon give way to a
;ile,' near-universal flu vaccine, according to a new report from scientists at the Scripps
search institute and the Dutch biopharmaceutical company Cn.icell; they describe an
ibody which, in animal tests, can prevent or cure infections with a broad variety of
uenza viruses, including seasonal and potentially pandemic strains
ad more
..
:>t $1 million from OHS for Syracuse, New.York? .
; Syracuse area in central New York could be re·ceiving its last OHS grant for anti-terror
:urity measures; in May, Syracuse was listed as one of the thirty-one cities across the
ited States scheduled to lose its funding from DHS's Urban Areas Security Initiative; under
program, Syracuse has received $1.2 million in 2008, $1.8 million in 2009, and this year

2
 S awarded.the county $959,951 in grant money
:id more

seball security
.8, OHS crack down on counterfeiting at All-Star games
. jar League Baseball (MLB), the Phoenix police department, and a host of federal, state,
I local law enforcement agencies are joining forces to combat counterfeit ticket and
rchandise sales during the 2011 MLB All-Star Week; undercover investigators will· be
ming the stadium grounds .and convention center
:id more

•
1pped couple receives bill for stay in New Zealand hotel during quake
:ouple stuck in a ChristChurch, New Zealand hotel .after the 22 February 6.3 magnitude
thquake struck the city, was shocked to discover they had been charged for their stay; a
N Zealand man and his Wife were trapped cin the hotel's twenty-second floor for hours and
mtually were forced to escape after daringly crossing collapsed stair cases, smashing ·
vri doors, and crawling to the roof of a parking lot nearby
::id more

The Homeland Security News Wire is an e-lnformation service providing a daily report and a
comprehensive Web site with news on and analysis of the business, technology,
and policy of homeland security. To receive your free copy of the .daily report, sign up here.

3
t •

Advertising: [email protected] I 503.546.9977 voice. I 503.280.8832 fax

Editorial: [email protected]
General: [email protected]

To unsubscribe, click "SafeUnsubscribe" below

IF the link below does not work, please send a blank message
to [email protected] with "unsubscribe" in the subject line

Homeland Security News Wire I 6 Birch Hill Road I Locu!1t Valley, N.Y. 11560 I p. 202.318.15~7 I f. 202.518.0029
©copyright 2009-2010 N_ews Wire Publications, LLC ®All rig_hts reserved

Forward email ·

. This email was sent to [email protected] by [email protected] i

Update Profile/Email Address ; Instant removal with SafeUnsubscriber"' i Privacy Policy.

Homeland Security Newswire I 6 Birch Hiii Road I Locust Valley I NY I 11560

4
 Email 50

Th ind, Aneet ·
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: ~19:22AM
To:
Subjec~: Re: Israel off terror list I DoT approves flying car I Trapped couple's hotel bi

b6
Thank you

From:
Sent: Friday, July OB, 2011 09:12 AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: FW: Israel off terror list I DoT approves flying car I Trapped couple's hotel bi

Wanted to make sure you saw this. See below.

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 49

1
DUPLICATE OY EMAIL 49

2
DUPLIQATE OF EMAIL 49

3
DUPLtCATE OF.EMAIL 49

4
Thind, Aneet

From:. Edwarcis, Charfe·s

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 1:05 PM
·To: Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne
Subject: FW: Au.dit Memo
Attachments: Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk.pdf; Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with
Risk (AIG Memo).pdf

Here is my email that I sent in March to John Morton.

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 37

1
 27 PAGE(S)

Draft report withheld in full

(WIF)
 .Email 52

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:05 AM
To: Richards, Anne.
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81

WiWdo.

Thank you,

Program Analyst
Office oflnspector General-Audits
U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security . b5,
Washin on, DC b6
(202 ofc phone
(202 blackberry
_(~.9.?... . -~~--- '. -·-·-···.,-·····--·-······---,.-----·---·-·-··-··--·-·---~------------··--·-··""'"·-·---·---·-·-··-··-- .........
·From: Richards, Anne
Sen~OS, 2011 10:03 AM
To:--

-
Subject: OIG-11-81

Can you pull this report

. Then the to be included in a revised report to be posted to the
web.

Thanks
Anne

1
 Email 53 .

Manino, Yvonne

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:42 AM
To: Manino, Yvonne ·
Subject: FW: OIG•11-81

FYI

From:
Sent: Friday, July 08, 201110:43 AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: R_E: OIG-11-81

Anne, the report has been updated, The request

they are currently working on it.
b5,
Thallkyou, b6

1
 Email 54

Manino, Yvonne

From: Richards, Anne .

Sent: Friday, July OB, 2011 10:39 AM
To: Manino, Yvonne
Subject: RE: Report Posted to Web (Contact 510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455232)

Thank you

-----Original Message--~-­
. From: Manino, Yvonne
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:37AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: Report Posted to-Web (Contact 510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455232)

Anne,

I sp~ke with - about this already. We will take care of it.

Thanks,

Yvonne Sy Manino
Acting Chief of Staff
DHS Office of the Inspector General
202- (Office)
202- (Mobile)
202- Fax

b6

-~~--original .Message-~~-­
Frorn: Richards, Anne
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011,10:33 AM
To: Manino, Yvonne
Subject: FW! Report Posted to Web· (Contact 510035). (Intranet Quorum IMA00455232)
Yvonne --·--
Do I need to reply, or are you taking care of this with ITD? ·

·-----0~--- ..
From: 111111111111111 mailto:
Sent: Friday, July es; 2011 10:31 AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Report Posted .to Web (Contact 510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455232)·
CC_AUD,

1
This email is being sent to riotify you that your report OIG-11-81 : "Supervision of Aliens
Commensurate with Risk" has been posted to the web on 06/02/2011. Please contact the OIG
Helpdesk if there· ire any issues concerning the posting. Thanks.

DIG Webmaster
http://dclpts01:800/iq/workflowhome.aspx?showfolder=workflow&showcontent=IDS10035&iAccount=DH
S OIG .

2
 Email 55

Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 1OA6 AM
To: · Richards, Anne b6
Subject: Information Copy from for E - Final Report Distribution# 510035.(Contact
510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455247) .

.cc_AUD,
Final report "OIG-11-81: Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk" was reassigned to
CC_WEB to be taken down and replejced. The revised report for posting is Document 5.

Thank you
http://dclpts01:800/ig/workflowhome.aspx?showfolder=workflow&showcontent=ID510035&iAccount=DH
SOIG· .

1
 Email 56

Thind,. Aneet

--.
From:
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:22 PM
To:
Cc:·
Subject: RE: Information Copy from for E - Final Report Distribution# 510035
(Contact 510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455373)

Okay.

-----Original Message-----
From: Manino, Yvonne
Sent: Frida , Jul 08, 2011 7:21 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: Information Copy from for E - Final Report Distribution # 510035
(Contact 510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455373)

·
iiill~ is that

- t h e y may say that we are

-----~e
From: . . . . . . . . . b5,
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 07:17 PM b6
To: Manino Yvonne
Cc:
Subject: FW: Information Copy from for E - Final Report Distribution # 510035
(Contact 510035) (Intranet Quorum IMA00455373)

-
Thanks,

OLA & OPA,

Fin~l report titled "OIG-11-81: Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk" is ~oing to be
taken down from the Internet and replaced with a revised version. It is Document 5. Please
coordinate the transmittal email with Yvonne

1
 .
----·--M .
- --- - ----- - ~

Email 57

Thind, Aneet

From:
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:55 AM
·To: Edwards, Charles; Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Manino, Yvonne
Subject: RE: Press Release . b5,
Attachments: 07-08-11 Press Release - OIG~11-81 (Draft).docx
b6

Charles: To add some meat to the Press Release, I suggest

. .The Press Release would read:

b5

###

. From: Edwards, Charles

Sent: Friday, July 08, 20·11 10:49 AM
To: Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Metelko, Marty; Manino, Yvonne
Subject: Press Release

Rick and Anne; .

Thank you both for your valuable input. Here's what we are proceeding with.

1
··-
.. r-·· ~-
-
-~------------··---- -- ·--------------·-- - -----.w---- --------------

b5

Thanks,

Charles

~harles K. Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of inspector General
Department of Homeland Security

2
 Email58

Thind, Aneet

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 11 :07 AM
To: Edwards, Charles
Subject: Re: Press Release

Thanks, RR

From: Edwards, Charles .

Sent: Friday, July 08, 201111:02 AM
To: Reback, Richard ·
Subject: FW: Press Release

Charles Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:55 AM
To: Edwards, Charles; Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Manino, Yvonne

Rick,

I took what do you think .. bS

bS

1
 ###

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 57

2
 Email 59
·'
Thin,c;!, A·heet
From:
Sent:
To:
Reback, Richard 1•••••••1
Friday, July 08, 201111:17 AM
Metelko; Marty; Edwards, Charles; Richards, Anne; Manino, Yvonne
Subject: RE: Press Release · bS,
b6
Can you pis verify Thanks, Rick

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Friday, July 08, 201111:13 AM
To: Edwards, Charles; Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Manino, Yvonne
Subject: RE: Press Release

Roger that, here's how the Press Release will read:

For Immediate Release . Office of Public Affairs

July 8, 2011 202-254-4100

·OHS INSPECTOR GENERAL UPDATES REPORT

Washington, DC- Washington, DC-The Office ofinspector General (OIG) has been advised that ICE incorrectly
included Israel in a list ·of countries subject to Third Agency Checks. This list was provided to the OIG during the course
of its audit, Supervision ofAliens Commensurate with Risk, OIG-11-81(May20.11) and inCluded in Appendix D.
Accordingly, the OIG has revised Appendix D and reposted the report. The OIG appreciates the Department's effort to
correct the record promptly.

OIG reports may be found on-line at: http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/index.shtm

###

From: Edwards, Charles

sent: Friday; July 08, 201111: 10 AM
To: Metelko, Marty; Reback, Richard;-Richards, Anne; Manino, Yvonne
. · Subject: RE: Press Release

Let's the following statement. b5

Washington, DC- The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has been advised that ICE incorrectly included Israel in a list of
countries subject to Third Agency Checks. This list yvas provided to the OIG during the course of its a~dit, Supervision of
Al.iens Commensurate with Risk, OIG-11-81(May2011) and included in Appendix D. Accordingly, the OIG has revised
Appendix D and reposted the report. The OIG·appreciates the Department's effort to correct the record promptly. .

OIG reports may be found on-line at: .'ttp://www.dhs.gov/xoig/index.shtm

1
 '

..
·"

Charles Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 57

2
DUPLIC.~TE.OF EMAIL 57

3
 Email 60

; ~hing, Aneet
# .
f'rom: Metelko, Marty · ·
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 2:01 PM
To: Mead, Gary; Moy, Michael C; DeAntonio, Robert F; Allen-Gifford, Patrice; Bird, Rose M;
Callahan; Mary Ellen; Claffie, Kathleen; Fong, Ivan; GAO-OIG Liaison; Grant, Daniel; hq ;
Kropf, John · · ·
Cc:
.. -·~~"' - .... -·
- -· -·-·
Audit-Red Folder Distribution; Butler, Jewel; Pereira, Maryann; Pettersen, Sean; Snow, Holly;

b6

Subject: p . .
Attachments: . OIG-11-81 Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk.pdf

All: We were advised that ICE incorrectly included ISrael in alist of countries subject to Third Agency
Checks. This list was provided to us during the course of ouriudit, Supervision ofAliens Commensurate with
Risk, OIG-11-81 (May 2011) and included in Appendix D. Accordingly, we have revised Appendix D and ·
reposted the report We appreciate the Department's effort to correct the record promptly. ·

. The report is attached and may also be found at:

http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG 11-81 Mayl 1.pdf

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.-Marty

.Marta Rivera Metelko

Director, Public Affairs
Office of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security
202 I 202.254.4100
Fax:202

·----·-------------------.. ~-,.----·----··-"-.... -----·-~-... ......~~-·

b6

Subject: OIG-11-81 "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk"

Good Afternoon,

. .

Final Report OIG-11-81 "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk" is attached and forwarded to you
for your information. ·

1
 *This is an advance copy that has not been made public by the.DIIS OIG. Do Not Distribute Without
; OIG Authorization. The projected date for delivery to Congress is May 24, 201L The projected date for Web
pasting is June 2, 2011. Actual dates may differ please contact OIG to confirm~ .

Department of Homeland Security

Office of Ins ector General/Office of Management b6
c202) - Office
202 -Cell

2
Supervision of Aliens Commensurate
with Risk
 ....
,er i

-,·

djftce ojinspector General

U.S~ Department of Homeland Security

· Washington, DC 20528 ·

Preface

The Department ofHomeland.Securicy (DHS) Of:ffoe oflllspector General (OIQ) was

established by the Homelcmd Security Act of2002 (PublicT.aw 107-296) by amendment
to the In.spector General Act of1978. This is. one of a= series ofauciit; inspectio~ and
special repoi:ts prepared as part of our oversight responsibilities to promote economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness within the department.

=This report addresses the effectiveness oflnunigration and Customs Enforcement's

decisionmaking process on whether to detain aliens in=.an I:hu:i:rigratiori and Customs ·
Enforcement facility or place them in supervi'.sed release. It is ..based on interviews .with. ·
employees and officials cif relevant agencies and institutions, direcf observatfons, and a
·reyjew, of applicable documents. ·

The recommendations herein have been develOped to the best knowledge available to our
office,· and have been discussed in draft with those responsible for implementation. We
trust th.is report will result in rriore effective; efficient, and economical operations. We
express our apprec:;iation to .all of those. who contributed
. . . .. to the. preparation of this report:

~;/~
· Aririe L. Richards
Assistant .Inspector·General for Audits
r. r\.

Table of Contents/Abbreviations
Executive Summary ...... ~ .............. ~ ..'.............................................. :················~·····················1 .

. Background .........•......................................... ;............................................................... ~ .. :...2 ·

Results of Audit ~ ... :............·...•....................................... :.·.........·......... ;..... ;.... :............'. .. ;.......4

Screening of Aliens Prior to Release ................................................................... :... .4

Decisions to Detaii:t or Release Aliens ...................................................... :~ ..............6

Conclusion ............................................................................. .-............ :.:................. 12

.
Recommendations .: ...................
.
,....... :...................................................................
.. . .-......... :...... 12

Management Colll1:11ents and OIG Allalysis ··················································:········~ .......... 13

Appendices

Appendix A: Purpose, Scope, and Methodology .............................. ;......................... 14

Appendix B: Management Comments to the Draft Report .................... :................... 15
.Appendix C: Allocation of ERO Resources: .................. ,..........:................................. 17
·Appendix D: SpeCially Designated Countries ............ ~ ............................................... 18
Appendix E: Secure Communities Crime Levels ................... ,................................... 19
Appendix F: Uncooperative Countries .................................. :......... ;..... :......... :.. :.......20
Appendix G: Major Contributors to.this Report ........................................................ .21 ·
Appendix H: Report Distribution............................................. :......... :........................22

Acronyms and Abbreviations

ATD Alternatives to Detention .

CAP Criminal Alien Program
CBP Customs and Border Protection
DHS Department of Homeland Security. ·
DQ&I· Data Quality and Integrity Unit
EARM ENFORCE Alien Removal Module
ENFORCE Enforcement Case .Tracking System
ERO Enforcement and Removal Operations
FY fiscal year
·ICE Immigration and Customs Enforcement
lNA Immigration andNationality Act
. NCIC National Crime Information Center ·
SC Secure Communities
SDC Specially designated country
TAC Third Agency Check
OIG:
.Department ofHomeland Securlty
Office ofInspector General· ·

Executive Summary
Imrriigration and Customs Enforcement's mission is to protect the
•security of the American.people by enforcing the nation's
immigration and customs laws. This includes the identification, ·
apprehension, detention, and removal of deportable aliens from the
United States. Aliens undergoing removal proceedings are either
held in an ;Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility
or placed in one-of :five supervised release options. On September
30, 2009, 31,306 aliens were in detention facilities, an estimated
153,000 were incarcerated in federal prisons or state and local jails,
and 1.5 million were released through a variety of supervision
options. Our audit objective was to assess the effectiveness of
In:tmigration and Customs Enforcement's decisionmaking process
on whether to detain aliens in ·an Immigration and Customs ·
Enforce~ent facility or place th.em in supervised release.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally has an

effectively designed 4_ecisionmaking process for determining
whether to detain or release aliens. In most of the cases we
assessed, officers ·made reasonable decisions and complied with
requirements of the Immigration and NationalityAct, Supreme
Court decisions, and prescribed policies and procedures. However,
personnel could not always provide evidence that all aliens were
screened against the Terrorist Watchlist; current policy for
screening ·aliens from specially designated countries is not .
effective; and personnel did not always maintain accurate and up-
to-date information in the case·manageinent system. Tiie agency
has taken action to correct deficiencies in its data· quality.

Immigration and· Customs Enforcement officials concurred with.

two of oitr three recommendations. Appendix B contains written
responses to the recompJ.endations from Immigration and Customs
Enforcement.· ·

--------·----- --··

Supervisicin of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Pagel
 Background
The Immigration_ and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Enforcement
and.Removal Operations (ERO) is responsible for the detention
.and removal of deportable aliens from the United States. Aliens
enter the United States legally or illegally, for leisl.lre or temporary
work, or to seek lawful permanent residence. ERO has 24 field
offices and 186 subfield offices, as well as the Deport Center m
Chicago, lliinois. 1 ERO' s operating budget for fiscal year (FY)
2009 was approximately-$2.5 billion~ (See Appendix C for the
alfo~ation ofERO's budget by program.) ··

ERO identifies and apprehends aliens through a variety of

programs and offices. The Criminal Alien Prdgram (CAP) focuses
on identifyiri.g criminal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and
local facilities and places a d~tainer2 on criminal aliens to process
· them for removal before the termination of their sentences. The
National Fugitive Operations Program apprehends aliens who fail
to surrender for removal or comply with a removal order.

Like CAP, ICE's Secure Communities (SC) Initiative identifjes

aliens serving sentences in jails. SC uses fingerprint and biometric
. identification technologies to identify incarcerated aliens. SC
categorizes crimes into .three levels according to severity (see
Appendix E for a list of crimes by level). ICE's Office of
Investigations identifies aliens while investigating issues such as
imniigration crime, human rights violations·, and human and other
types of smuggling. In addition, Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) appreheI,1.ds aliens at and between ports of entry and along
the nation's borders. When CBP. cannot secure immediate return
of an alien, it ·turns custody of the alien: over to ERO.

Once ICE takes custody of an alien, processing agents conduct

research to determine"if the alien has a criminal or iinmigration- ..
history that would require ICE to detain the alien, and to deterniine
if the alien is on the Terrorist Watch.list or'wanted by another law.
enforcementagenc;y~

The Enforcement Case Tracking System (ENFORCE), which

inc1udes the ENFORCE Alien Removal Module (EARM), is
. ER9's primary administrative case management.system, EARM

I The ICE Deport Center processes dej:iortation dispositions resulting from the Bureau of Prisons, the
· _Incliana and lliinois Departments of Corrections, and jails in the Chicago metropolitan area.
2
A detainer is a document ERO uses to request that a correctional facility contact ERO prior to releasing an
alien so that ERO may ~sunie custody and begin a removal proceeding. ... .

Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page.2
I . .. t~ ._

contains information such as the alien identification number,

country of origin, criminal history, status of adjudication
proceedings, and type of supervision. On September 30, 2009,
ERO reported that it had 1~671,879 active alien cases classified as
either detained or nondetained. Detained aliens are those held in·
ICE detentiqn facilities, while nondetained aliens are criminal
· aliens incarcerated in federal, state, or local jails and aliens
released on aform of ERO supervision. ~very case, whether
.detained or nondetained, remains part.ofERO's caseload, and
ERO processes and monitors c<1-ses as they move through
. immigration court proceedings to conclusion.

According to EARM, ERO released the majority ofthese aliens to

one of five supervision options: (1) Alternatives to Detention
program (ATD); (2) order of supervision; (3) parole; (4) bond; or
(5) order of recognizance. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of
ERO's alien population. ·

Figure 1: Di.Stribution ofERO's Alien Population*

As ofSeptember 30, 2009

Released Under Supervision

1,487,796 (89%)

./·
· Incarcerated · Detaixied
152,777 (9%)
""" 31,306 (2%)
*ERO provided this i11formation; we did not verffy its accuracy.

ERO' s 0perating. procedures require levels. of supervision ·based on

an alien's stage in the removal process, flight risk, or danger to the
public. According to.ERO, aliens in inui:rigration proceedings but
11ot subject to.a final order of removal generally require les·s ·
supervision than aliens who are· subject to a. final order of removal
and are awaiting the:ii actual removal. The strictest forms of
released supervision areICE's ATD programs, which use.

Supervision of Aliens ·commensurate with Risk

.Page3
 electronic devices to monitor aliens, and orders of-supervision,
which require aliens to report periodically·to ERO . .ICE may
choose to release aliens who pose a minimal risk to the commqn.ity
or risk of ~eeing on parole, bond, or order of recogmzance.

The primary law governing detention or release of aliens is the

Immigration and Nationali'ty Act. (INA) of 1965, as amended. "rhe
INA grants aliens the right to a removal proceeding before an
immigration judge and mandates that ICE detain certain aliens
w~le the removal _proce~dings are in progress. The INA also
defines which aliens are subject to mandatory detention during
· immigration proceedings. Aliens who are subjectto maridatory
detention include those convicted of crimes such as the following: .

• Terrorism
• Aggravated felonies
• Human traffi~king
• Controlled substance violations
• Money laundering

We assessed the effectiveness ofERO's ded.sionmaking process

on whether to detain aliens in an ERO facility or place them in .
supervised release.

Results of Audit
ICE generally has an: effectively designed deciSionmakillg process for determining
.. whether to detain or release aliens. In most qf the cases we assessed, ICE officers .
made reasonable decisions and complied with requiremen,ts of the :WA, Supreme
.Court decisions, and prescribed policies and procedures. However, personnel could
not always provide evidence that all aliens were screened against the Terrorist
Watchlist; current policy for screening aliens from designated countries..is not
·effective; and personnel did not always maintain accurate and up-to-date
information in the .case management system.

·Screening. of Aliens Ptiorio Release

Terrorist Watchlist
. .
In 2005, ICE issued a policy memorandum requiring officers to
conduct a search of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
database iinmediately upon takii:ig custody of any alien to
determine whether the alien is a known or suspected .te;rrorist. ICE
officers perform.a"wants and warrants". search through the NCIC·

Supervision of Aliens Commensurate ~th Risk

Page4
i' •

database to identify a]iens who are wapted by anqther law

enforcement agency and aliens who are on the Terrorist Watchlist..

We reviewed 59 case files for aliens whom ICE released from

custody to detemiine whethei; ICE screened them against the NCIC
· database for terrorist ties; According to NCIC records and ERO
case files, ICE did not perform an NCIC check for 2 (3%) of the 59 ·
aliens. We contacted NCIC arid obtairied records confirming that.
·· the aliens were not knoWn or suspected terrorists.

Although we found only two cases in which ICE officers did not
properly screen aliens, releasing a single known or suspected
terrorist could have serious ramifications.

Screening Aliens From Specially Designated Countries

In addition to the Terrorist Watchlist screening, ICE uses a Third

Agency Check (TAC) to screen aliens from specially designated
countries (SDCs) that have shown a tendency to promote, produce,.
or protect terrorist organization.S or therr members (see appendix D
for a list of SDCs). The purpose of the additional screening is to
determine whether other agencies have an interest in the alien.
ICE's policy requires officers to conduct TAC ·screenings only for
aliens from SDCs ifthe aliens are in ICE custody. As a result, ICE.
does not perform a TAC for the inajority of its population of
aliens, which includes those incarcerated or released under
· supervision. Figure 2 shows the portion of aliens from SDCs who
ICE held in detention. ·

Figure 2: Population of Aliens From SDCs3

· : As ofSeptember 30, 2009 ·
. . .

Nondetained Aliens - 105,359 (not subject to TAC)

I.

Detained Aliens - 1,521 (subject to TAC)

We reviewed 116 case files of aliens from SD Cs to determine

whether. ICE performed
. the·
.
TAC in all instances where ICE policy . .

3
. As of September 30, 2009, ICE's database contamed records for 105,359 ncindetaineQ. aliens :rn:;m SDCs. ·
ICE performed a TAC screening for.some of these aliens because they were in ICE custody before that
date. Other Department of Homeland" Security components may have screened other nondetained aliens:

Super.vision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Pages
l •

requires it. ICE officers did not always adhere to the TAC policy
for screening detained aliens from SDCs. ICE should have
performed a TAC prior to the alien's release in 56 (48%) of these.
cases. ICE did not screeff4 of the 56 aliens requiring a TAC.

ICE do.es not have an effective policy in place to ensure that all
· detained aliens from SDCs undergo a TAC screening. ICE did not
· screen the remaining 60 (52%) aliens in our sample because ICE
did not detain the aliens· in custody (51), because the Departm~nt
of Justice granted the aliens relief from removal proceedings (7),
or because ICE apprehended them before the date.the policy went
into effect (2). ICE risks releasing an alien with ties to·terrorist
organizations if officers do not perfomi a TAC on all detained and ·
nondetained aliens frorri. SDCs.

Decisions to Detain or Release Aliens·

..
The INA grants ERO the authority to detain or release and monitor aliens
who are not subject to· mandatory detention. Once ERO encounters an··
alien, officers should screen the alien to evaluate the alien's criminal' and
prior immigration history and to determine if the alien is on the Terrorist
Watchlist. Officers also evaluate humanitarian factors and have the option
to release aliens for extenuating circumstances. For example,. ICE may
release aliens who are nursing mothers, sole providers, young or elderly,
or have medical conditions affecting the alien or the alien's family. ERO
supervisors review and approve all decisions to detain or release aliens.

In addition to the.175 cases we reviewed to assess ERO's screening

process, we assessed officer custody deci~ions in 732 active alien cases.
We selected cases where ERO released criminal aliens or detained aliens
who had no criminal convictions or convictions .for minor crimes. In
addition, we selected cases where ERO either detained or released fugitive
aliens and suspected gang members. We determiD.ed whether ERO
officers detained aliens who were subject to mandatory detention, posed a
·threat to the ptibiic, or were likely' to abscond; or released aliens with
. supervision that was comin.ensurate with the risk they posed (see detailed.
··audit methodology in Appendix A) .

.Criminal Aliens Not in ERO CustOdy

According. to ERO records, on September 30, 2009, the ·

nondetained alien population included 168,204 alien.s convicted of
SC Level 1, 2; or~ crimes. Figure 3 illustrates the distribution.of .
crime levels for released or incarcerated aliens in ERO' s database.

Supervision· of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page 6.
 Figure 3: .Distribution of Secure Communities Crime Levels
As ofSeptember 30, 2009
70,000
59,952
60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,QOO

0
L9Y811 Lewi 2 · L9Y811or2" L9Y813

* The length ofa sentence determines whether the offense is a Level I or

Level 2 crim~. We did not determine the lengths. ofsentences in these cases.

ERO uses the SC crime levels to prioritize enforcement actions and

focuses iinmigration enforcement on the most dangerous criminal
aliens. The most dangerous criminal aliens are those charged with
or convicted of a Level 1 offense, including homicide, kidnapping,·
and sexual assault (see Appendix E for a list of crimes by level).
Accordingto ERO records, 8,278 aliens had homicide convictions,
8,146 had sexual assault convictions, and 2,124 had kidnapping
convictions. The INA mandates that ERO detain aliens convicted
of these crimes duriiig the removal process.

We reviewed 284 cases involving aliens convicted of Level I

crimes to determine why ERO did not detam . them. We also
· determined whether ERO provided a level of supervision·
commensurate with the risk the alien posed to the public.
According to our analysis, 217 (76%) criminal all.ens were not in
ERO's custody but were in federal prisons or state or local jails
servi:iig sentences for their crimes. For example, ICE encountered
an alien serving a.25-year sentence in an Arizona prison for
multiple conviction8, including murder, attempted inurder, and
weapon8 violations. ICE placed a detainer on the alien, requesting
the prison to notify ICE before releas"ing the alien. 4

4
While we did not assess whether ERO placed detainer~ on all incarcerated aliens eligible for rem~val, our
office issued an audit report that addresses the effectiveness o;fICE's identification process, which includes
determining whether the ii.lien is rem(lvable and placing a detainer when· applicable. See U.S. Immigration
and Custom's Jdentifi.cation.ofCrimi1Jal Aliens in Federaz'and State. Custody Eligible for Removal.from the
United State8 (OIG~ll-26), January 2011. · · · ·

. Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page7
..
ICE released 53 (19%) criminal aliens under supervision because ·
their countries of origin did not issue the necessary travel
documents, such as a passport, wi:thin the 90-day statutory initial ·
.. removal perio4. Although th~ INA mandates that ERO detain
these criminal aliens during the rein.oval process, ICE cannot
· detain aliens indefinitely. According to the 2001 Supreme Court
decision Zadvydas v. Davis, ICE generally can only detain an alien • ·
. beyond the initial removal period if it determines that the alien is
likely to abscond if released, poses a danger to the public, or is
like_lyto obtain travel documents in the near future. Even then,
ICE may not normally detain an alien for more than 180 days if
·there is no significant likelihood of removal in the. reasonable
foreseeable future 5•

The governments of Cambodia, Cuba, Iran, Laos, Pakistan, and

Vietnam are generally uncooperative and will not issue travel.
documents when ERO tries to repatriate aliens to these countries
(see Appendix F for a list ofuncooperative countries). Since it is
· unlikely that aliens from these countries will obtain travel
· docmnents, ERO mrist eventllaily release inost of them. For
example, ERO encountered a Cambodian who had multiple .
c;:onvictions for child abuse and sexual assault. ERO detained the
alien in 1999 after he completed his prison sentence and an
immigration judge ordered his removal. However, because
Cambodia did not issue the necessary travel documents, ERO
released the alien into an ATD program in 2001-. .

The.remaining 14 (5%) of the 284 cases were not in ICE's custody·

or under its supervision at the time of our review. F<?r example,
ICE removed an alien from the United States in July 2008, but the
case was still activ~ in ICE's case management system. ICE
officei;s did not update information in EARM to show that the alien
was deported. ·

_Noncriminal Aliens.Held in Detention

ERO has limited detention resources and prioritizes cases to detain .

aliens subject to mandatory detention before other aliens. ERO has
the-discretion to release aliens who are not subject to mandatory
. detention into o:ther, less restrictive methods of superv1sion, such
as the ATD program or bond. According to ERO records, on
September 30, 2009, 15,908 noncriminal aliens were held in
detention facilities. We defmed noncriminal aliens as those who

5
The INA contains a provision pen:i:ritting extended detention for "terrorist aliens.;; 8 U.S.C § 1226a.

Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Pages
!?' ' l •

did not have an NCIC6 code associated with their cas~s. An NCIC
· code indicates that the alien was convicted of, or charged with, a
crime. We reviewed 280 cases involving aliens who, according to
ICE data, did not have criminal convictions. For each case, we
determined the reasons why ERO detained the alien." .

According to our analysis, ERO officers exercised discretion and

detained 72 (26%) noncriminal aliens in accordance with the INA,
agency priorities, and prescribed policy and procedtires. For.
example, ERO detained ari alien because the alien would not
comply with ICE officers and was a threat to ·the community; In
addition, 36 (13%) detainees were unaccompanied juvenile aliens.
During rein.oval proceedings, ERO turns custody of these aliens
over to the Department of Health and Human Services, which
detains unaccompanied juvenile aliens in approved facilities and
tries to reunite them with their parents or legal guardians.

Of the 280 cases, 170 (61 %). aliens actually had criminal histories
that required detention.· The data. that ERO provided did not
contain the NCIC code indicating that these aliens were criminals.
In some cases, there was a delay from the time of our data request
to when officers entered the criminal history. In other cases, ·
officers documented.the criminal history in physical case files but
not in EARM. For example, an alien had multiple convictions
dating back to 1978. The convictions included homicide, a
·. weapons offen.Se, larceny, and burglary. ERO apprehended and
deported the alien on six separate occasions since 1986.. However,
ERO did not record the criminal history until May 2010, when an
officer entered 13 convictions or charges intoEARM.

The remaining two cases were not in ICE custody at the time of
our review. For example, ICE released an alien on bond in March
2009, but the alien still appeared in ICE's detained population on ·
September 30, 2009. · . · ·

Actions ICE Has Taken to Improve Data Quality

·ICE has taken several steps to improve the quality of the ·data in
EARM. ICE. established a Pata Qua~ity and IntegritJ Unit (DQ&I)
in 2008. The pwpose of the DQ&l is to ensure that. data in EARM
ate accurate, reliable, and timely. ·The DQ&I initiated efforts to ·
identify and correct errors in EARM, and developed a guide for
·officers to use when·processing aliens. In addition, ICE made data.

6
The National Crime Information Center maintains ·a law enforcement database that defines codes · ·
representing types of crimes.

-Supervision· of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page9
 quality a priority by including it in perform~ce evaluations for
field office directors. ·

.
Low-Level
. Criminal Aliens Held
'
in·Detention

Accorcling to ERO records, ori September 30, 2009, ERO was

detaining 1;504 aliens convicted· of SC Level 3 crimes. These
include crimes such as immigration violations, property damage,
commerciaiized sex offenses, and· extortion (see Appendix E for a ·
full list of SC Level 3 crimes). Although these crimes are not as
egregious as Level I or 2 crimes, the INA requires detention for
some Level 3 crimes, such as commercialized sex offenses ..

We analyzed 57 LevelJ criminal alien cases. For each case, we

determined the reasons why ERO detained Level 3 critD.in:als.
·According to our analysis, 45 (79%) aliens were subject to
mandatory detention pursuant to requirements in the INA.

For the remaining 12 (21 %) cases, the aliens were not mandatory
detainees; however, officers decided to detain the aliens on the
basis of risk, and in accordance with INA requirements, ICE
priorities, and prescribed policies and.procedures. For example,
ICE detained a suspt::cted gang member because he posed a risk to
the public. According to EARM, the alien's only convictions were.
violation of immigration law and falsifying doc.umerits. Neither
conviction required mandatory detention.

National Fugitive Operations Program

. · The National 'Fugitive Op.erations Prograni's primary mission is to

locate and apprehend fugitive aliens within the United States.
Fugitive aliens are those who have failed to leave after receiving a
·'final order of removal; deportation, or exclusion; or who have failed
to report to ERO after receiving a notice to appear. Arresting and
removing fugitive aliens is one ofICE's priorities. The number of
arrests iricreased from FYs 1003 through 2009, as illustrated in
Figure4 ..

Supervision of Aliens Commensura~e with Risk

Page 10
 ·. Figure 4: Increase in Fugitive Alien Arrests
FYs 2003-:-2009
40,000

34,155 34,759
35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06 FY07 FYOS F,Y09

. We reviewed 59 fugitive alien arrests made during FY 2009. For

·each case, we determined whether ICE detained fugitive aliens
pursuant to requirements of the INA. ICE detained 47 (80%).
fugitive aliens apprehended in FY 2009 and released the remaining
12 (20%). Officers exercised their discretion and released the
alien8 for humanitarian reasons. The following examples illustrate
cases where officers exercised discretion and released fugitive
aliens on an order of supervision.

• A mother who was the sole provider for two minor children

• A 71-year-old alien

• A criminal alien who suffered a broken neck in a car

accident
. . . . .

ICE's Office oflnvestigations-Operation Communi'tvShield

ICE's Office of Investigations arrested 1,785 gang members and

·associates, criminals,. and other aliens during its 2009 Gang· Surge
Operation. The operation· was part of the larger, nationwide
Operation CommwtitY Shield, which targeted tra.risnational street
gangs iilvolved in human smuggling and trafficking, narcotics
smuggling and.distribution, weapons smuggling and arms
trafficking, and other crimes. According to ICE's Office of
.Inves~gations, violent transnational criminal street gangs r~present
a threat to public safety in neighborhoods across the United States.
· ICE's Office of Investigations generally recommends that ERO
detain gang members to protect the public.·

Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page 11
If ' I '

We reviewed 52 gang member arrests during the Gang Surge

Operation ID 2009. Upon arrest, ICE turned the alien gang members
over to ERO custody for removal. For each case, we determined
whether ERO overturned ICE's IDitial custody recommendations ·
and released the aliens. Of the 52 arrests, 47 (90%) aliens wer~
subject to mandatory detention or ICE detained them because they
posed a danger to the public. ICE's Office oflnvestigatloiis
recommended that ERO release three (6%) aliens because they were
juveniles (two) or participating ID an ongoIDg ICE investigation
·(one). The remfilning two (4%) aliens were incarcerated in federal
prisons or local jails. We did not identify cases where ERO
. overturned ICE's IDitial custody recommendations. However, we
determined that immigration judges later released six of the aliens
from detention, and ERO released one into an A TD program.

Conclusion

In most of the cases we assessed, ICE officers made reasonable decisions

regarding the appropriate levels of supervision and complied with
requirements of the INA, Supreme Court decisions, and prescribed
policies and procedures. ICE's process and procedures to screen aliens to
determine the appropriate levels of supervision are generally well
designed and being followed. ICE needs to enforce the requirement to
screen aliens against the Terrorist Watchlist and improve its policies and
· procedures regarding screening aliens .from SDCs and updating the
information in its case management systei:ri.

Recommendations·

We recommend that the ICE ERO J:)irector:

Recomme~dation #1: Enforce current policy and pro~edures for

screening aliens against the NqC prior to release, and develop
procedures to ensure that personnel comply with the policy.'

Recommenilation #2; ·Revise ICE's current policy to require

officers to conduct TAC screenings for all aliens from SDCs, not
just those held in ICE detention facilities. ·

Recommendation #3: Develop procedures to ensure that officers

comply with requirements to maintam accurate and up-to-date
information in EARM. ·

. .
, Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page 12
..
Management Comments arid. OIG Analysis
We obtained written comments on the draft report from ICE's
Chief Financial Officer. We included.a copy of the management
comments in therr entirety in Appendix B. The following is an
. evaluation oflCE's.official response: ·

Management Respo_nse ori Recommendation #1

ICE- concurred with this recommendation, and will disseminate a

broadcast message on April 15, 201 !", to ·the Field Office Directors.
and Deputy Field Office Directors reinforcing the importance of
conducting NCIC checks prior to release or removal of aliens .. ·

OIG Analysis: We consider ICE's proposed action responsive to

the recommendation and consider the recommendation resolved,
qut it will remain .open
. until ICE releases.
. this message.
.

Management Response on Recommendation #2 ·

ICE did not concur with this_ recommendation, indicating that the
agency does not have sufficient resources to screen all aliens from
SDCs.

OIG Analysis: ICE's current TAC policy is ineffective because

·ICE does not perform a TAC for 99% of the popU.lation of aliens
from SDCs. Conducting TACs is additional measure that can .
assist ICE in identifying individuals who may pose a threat to the
United States. According to ICE, TACs have resulted in high-
profile prosecutions of suspected terrorists .. We consider this
recommendation unresolved· and open.

Management Response on Recommendation #3

ICE concurred with this recommendation and implemented two

initiatives that should improve the accuracy of information ill
EARM. ICE updated the Alien Booking Module of the ENFORCE
system to improve ICE's capability capture and track an alien's
. criminal history. Additionally, the ERO DQ&I implemented
ongoing processes to monitor and v!:\lidate data in EARM.

OIG Analysis: We consider ICE's proposed action responsive to

·the recommendation and consider this recommendation closed and
-resolved. ·

Supervision of Aliens Commensurate w.ith Risk

Page 13

_\
Appendix A·
Purpose, S_cope, and Methodology

This report provides the results ·of our work to determine the
·effectiveness ofICE's decisiomnakbig process on whether to
detain ·aliens in a detention facility or place them in supervised
release. To achieve· om objectives~ we conducted fieldwork at six
ICE field offices {Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Miami, and·
· Phoenix); reviewed 907 cases; interviewed ICE headquarters
officials, deportation officers, and Office of Investigations agents
regarding decisions to detain or release aliens; reviewed relevant
laws, regulations,. standard operating procedures, and policy;
identified all active cases in ICE's EARM database on September·
30, 2009; reviewed prior audit reports regarding the release or
detention of aliens and ICE's decisiomnaking process; assessed the
reliability and validity of data provided by ICE by comparing ERO
·Field Office documentation with data maintained iri ICE's EARM;
.and identified
.. .and analyzed
.
active cases where.
ICE- ..

• Screened aliens against the Terrorist Watchlist;

• Screened aliens from specially designated countries;
• Released aliens convicted of aggravated felonies;
• Detained aliens who did not have criminal convictions;
• Detained aliens convicted of lesser crime&;
• AITested and detained or released fugitive aliens; and.
• Arrested and detailled or released aliens wlio were
suspected gang members.

We conducted our audit betWeen March and December 2010 under

the authority of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended,
and according tq generally accepted government auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a
-reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions.'

Supervision of Alienii Commensurate.with Risk'

. Page-14
.. . AppendixB
Management Comments to the. Draft Report

j;.

· ·: !t~:::::J~~On
:1.fuf~t..'

ili~5~~~
:;J~at1~1.
'F'R¢M.;
.
·~ _:

:y~s'.1ri~~i~~¥iif::~1s!~~~~:~11 r<l~~fJ-;t1c~);~Pere.d~1.~:.~i~f>1;])61iu1iii~~:1~~~ni11tea11;:oc1 .
therlmfi.''feptit:t:.:Ariaeltei!L1s'Gt1t.respoti:sr.na e11cli:ret!amma1dm:lt>1t.:

:Recojrj:mf,itt~J;(tiO:ri.•#1::;~1l;)Ji!i;i;tlqi.ii1~ p()~,f;)mtllJtOCCdll~S:f<)f S.."i'.Cci)i:ii:_gAA~~:~gajl._l~:tJie;

:N'tlC P,rfoi: ~.oreJ:eas.¢;...at,dide,;t:efoP: J>rociil!duresi<t~-e.i1St.tre.fl?iat:pe-1mflllel:e1>m~;,;r~·wttkllie;p:ctli~~··.

•:tllt4fB~
,t~~~~ffi~~;~~~:~it~,tt,)1o,l~id~th1~j~i''.~;~.l1~)~~~·~~~tn.~~~ii~·l'f.f,i~.~ :':

:n~~~~m~~i•f!(irt~~~~:· ~~!Jf:e::~°'#~iteii'1;~101r~~i,~~rtu1r~·fi:rt~~~:19j:QJ~W~·i%li.i:~··. ,. :·,

·Jii¥e.ilG)':;:eh~l.~fi:ir'·lil1~Iienlf.from'~pi;tcjafly•ilw~fatetb.::.ountt:ie"'~/1wouj11st:mos&:held·iltlCE
'.i3~)~)~@n;:~~efµ.1(!U.~: . " : "

~1-;•!!SS:•~l!itTt
.~Qt;iiiji~il;'P"11>tilwiiittg:i;;1~m'i>:re:it:i.m-l:O~tf.ttl:ijli1.::1l~·:f:~.:Jm·s.-i)~Qi~11¥Ue;.<sga~ii:;tt,Gri1J11•ri~'($DC':i)·. ·
:.~?~fujt.:~a),1Mi#~ii~(iJ:it:.tJ'.~;;~tir~~;\~~&!~:1~,tt~ri11~~~~.... #ti:r~~\ui1r;1~:f:~1.r#.~t:.tt!t;::~"iia!~1:l::~~~c.· ·

· Supervision of Aliens Co~mensurate with Risk

Page 15
 AppendixB
Management Comments to the Draft Report

eheok will be .eomple1ed ott these aliens. prior to renrov~1I. Jn. addl11ion,. it i:11 ~t ICE poUcy
10conduct TAC checks as a.:ppropria«: on :aU aliens c!>ming into ICE custody*· ICE: wEU oonduct
periodic revie.w·s.10 ,ensure existing :poliicy :fs: bein_g. enro~"'

Recommendation 1#3: Develop procedu.roi 10 ensure that omc-ers: c:cmpiy with requirem®ts
1:0 main1ah1 accurate-: and up-to-date infonnatfon in EARM. ·
t:CE Rt5J1ons~ ICE e:gn~. In a ~nt updaU= lo the Enfo:n::e Allen Booking Module ·
(!EABM), a. Crime: Entry Screen bas ·been implemented. 'file mandatory screen allow.s officers
in the nll'ld lo· capmre the subJeet's. crim1natity at the lime oi~rehetlsm In me repoct, OlG
'filled tl1i emnplc wttt=rtian 11.ticn had multiple conviction$, iineluding a homicide. dating back to
l91B. ·. lCE. deported the alien six times :&inee 1986, but ihe c~h:ninal history w.as :not me~d
lnlO ilie Enforce Alien RemowlModule (EARM); until Ma)' 201(1, The new Crime Enil'y
S(l:!'een (CES} fat.iililatt::r; crime da.l;il; ·ceq)tu~ ind: tu!$. betin •d'.d.'Cd to btttb the' Enforce Alien
Booking. ModuCc.t and· tho: Bnforcc Ati1m Rem.owl Module 10 track lhe crimes .associated wi.th
an alien, as thny move throo&'1 fue enforcement and removal prttc:esses. These new :fiekk will
pr.cwide st:eatie:tu{iifbrmity of reporting !Ind etmly ofinfonnaticn acto55< ICE opcrilriona1 imits.
This new CCS capability aUDWs the ·us.en; to enter· crimes at tile 1imie of encounter, thus . .
enablin~ ~CE w ttaclt a $.tlbjeet'.s criminality lhroughout d3e removal$ prc;ce$$ n resulling in
mote robust rcponi:ng.

JCE~s ERO Dnm. Quality ..st lnte!Jrii:y (DQ&I) Ti!Cr Teams :are assijsting eacn :ti~d onice wiih
the. cmbli1>hmcnt oflt;Jdd OQ&I teatnS. lhi: J::R.O r>Q&f teams trml!l ll!J1Ci providi; lbc: field
DQ&I t~ms witb the edueational reoo:i:rrces and toots necessary to nwnitortheir own data and
10 prevent and correct errors. Critttt: Etttry Screen 1rain1n.,g. is.a pan .ofllii:!H~f'fcrt.

ICE ls t.ak~ngother· measures to ensure tbat EARM i.s: as current as possible. In October :;mm,
ERO DQ&J bes~ a new eroa$-'Validatk:m q~er,:v. ERO :oQ&. I rir:iw praces$es a montl'!ly q~cry
of aH rcmovat: c:asa eloscd as non-c:riminlds in EA.RM El8Binst NCIC/Nutrs that snow
. poss:ibw conviction indicators 81 !heir NClC .t:riminal reei>rd. ERO DQ&J sends the: results or .
tbe, (ju.er.)' 10 ihe affected field offices and requ.ireii them .to, updale e;teh cm;e in E.AJ.UtL This
· · ,(Jt].gt;1ing proci:$,. ens~=s thtllt lht:: ¢;1;fminaJ TC:Cotd.'!o ate w;eumti:!lY ~f'lccced ln EAB.M wElhln ,i::me
mcnth of case·1escl11tion.

JCE bc'Hr.w~ lhesc IWO h11iti.alivcs wm h"v~ .~ maj'1!r imp~c•. on ·mi\intaining l!(l(:twate> and up.~
ii.ate: infbmmtion wi1hln EARM. ICE conlimres to seek inmn"at&ve md c:.osc~efrective: means to
promole accuracy within EARM.

IC:E requests; !his recommendation be eonsidcn:d TCliOlvcd. i!Uld clOicd.

Sho1:tkii you ha\'e any quesr.1011S.,Ol"Ci)tl.cerns, plea.sie con.met M:fcltael: Moy~ OtG Ptircfoli~
· Manager, at (lm) '13!i~63. or by o-matl al Mh;bacl.Mo"®dOO,i!ID.!. · · . .

·------ ---...-------------.,.---~---.----·--,-----

. Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk ·

-. Page i6
~ .
Append.ix C ·
Allocation of ERO Resources

Allocation of ERO Resources for FY 2009

$2,000,000
$1,774,696
$1,800,000

i.
$1,600,000
$1,400,000
~ $1,200,000
0 .
.c
. ~ $1,000,000
$800,000
~-
Ci $600,000
c
$400,000
$200,000
$0
Custody Transport & FugltiYB . Criminal Allan AltematM!s to
Operations Remol.BI · Operations Program Detention

Supervision of Allens Commensurate with Risk

Page 17
AppendixD
Specially Designated Countries

ICE provideq this list of specially designated countries. ICE

policy requires officers to perform a TAC for detained aliens from
these countries. · ·

..•• Afghanistan
Algeria
Bahrain
•
..
. Territories of Gaza West
Bank
·oman
• Bangladesh • Pakistan
• Djibouti • Philippines
• Egypt. • Qatar
• Eritrea • Saudi Arabia
• Illdonesia • Somalia
• Iran • Sudan

..
• Iraq . Syria
. Jordan • Tajikistan
• ·Kazakhstan • Thailand
• Kuwait • Tunisia
• Lebanon ·• Turkey
• Libya • Turkmenist~

..•• Malaysia
Mauritania •
• United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Morocco • Yemen

Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page 18
'· '
AppendixE .
Secure Communities Crime Levels

ICE uses the Secure Communities crime levels to prioritize

enforcement actions and focuses immigration enforcement on the
most dangerous criminal aliens. The most dangerous criminaJ.
aliens are those convicted of or charged with a Level 1 offense,
including homicide, kidnapping, and sexual assault. ·

Homicide
Kidnapping
Sexual Assault Larceny
Robbe Stolen Vehicles
Assault Fore
Threats. ·Fraud
Extortion - Threat to Injure Embezzlement
Person
Sex Offenses Stolen Property Commercialized Sex
Offenses
Cruelty Toward Child, Wife Damage Property Liquor
w/Explosive
Resisting an Officer Traffic Offenses Obstructing the Police
Weapon
Hit and Run
Dru s Sentence > 1 ear
Invasion of Privac
Elections Laws
··Conservation
Public Order Crimes

I
---------------·---------.-·-·

·Supervision of Allens Com.mens.urate with Risk .

Page 19
q
AppendixF ,
Uncooperative Countries

ICE provided the following list of the top 15 countries that generally
will not issue travel documents when ERO tries to repatriate aliens ·
to these countries. This list is not all-encompassing because there
are other countries that pose obstacles in repatriating ciJiens.

· • Bangladesh
• ·Cambodia.
• . Caribbean combined (Jamaica, St. Lucia, Dominica,
St. Vincent and the Grenadines, St. Kitts and Nevis,
Trinidad and Tobago, Antigua and Barbu~a)
·• China
· • Cuba
• India
• Iran
• Laos
• Liberia
• Pakistan
• Republic of Congo
• Sierra Leone
• Somalia
• Vietnam
• Zimbabwe

Supervision of Aliens Commensurat~ with Risk

Page20
AppendixG
Ma.ior Contributors to this Report

Jewel Butler, Director

Maryann Pereira, Desk Officer
Sean Pettersen, Audit Manager
Holly. Snow, Auditor-in-Charge
Sharon Trodden, Auditor
Andrew Herman; Auditor
· Marisa Coccaro; Program Analyst
Gary Crownover, Program Analyst
Lindsay Kirchoffner, Program Analyst
· Elizabeth Clark, Program _Analyst

Supenrision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page21
..1
AppendixH
Report Distribution

Department of Homeland Security

Secretary
Deputy Secretary
Chief of Staff
Deputy Chief of Staff
· General Counsel
Executive Secretariat·
Director, GAO/OIG Liaison Office
Assistant Sec:i;etary for Office of Policy
Assistant Secretary for Office of Public Affairs . ·
Assistant Secretary for Office of Legislative Affairs

Immigration and Custonis Enforcement

ICE Aµdit Liaison

.Office of Management and Budget

Chief, Homeland Security Branch

DHS OIG Budget Examiner

·Congress

Congressional Oversight and Appropriations Committees, as

.appropriate

Sµpervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk

Page22
ADDITIONAL INF:ORMATION AND COPIES

To obtain additional copies of this report, please call the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at (202) 2S4-4100,
fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web site at www.dhs.gov/oig. ·

OIG HOTLINE .

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of criminal or noncriminal
misconduct relative to department programs or operations:

•Call our Hotline at 1.:.800-323-8603;

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292;

• Email us at [email protected]; or

• Write to us at:
OHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600,
Attention: Office of Investigations - Hotline, .
245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410,
Washington, DC 20528.

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each write( and ·caller.
 ~
,. '
' ·Email 61

-·
Snow, Holly

From:
Sent: Wednesday.July 13, 201112:45 PM
To: Snow, Holly .
Cc: Pettersen,.Sean .
Subject: .RE: Project File 10-092-AUD-ICE-

No proble'm my pleasure.

•• ·I

bs;
------------------------------·--------·
From: Snow, Holly b6
. Se~, July i3, 2011.2:32 PM .
To:~ . ·
Subject: Re: Project File 10-092-AUD-ICE-

Thank you very much for all of your.help!

Holly Snow.
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
303· (bb)
303 (office)
.... ·-·-··"·--·-·----------------------------·-·--.-.:.____.__ ______ ___ ._________···-.
..:_ , ~······-----·----"''""····-----·-··-·
From: . . . · ·
sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 01:56 PM. · · ·
To: Snow Holly ·
Cc: liiiiiiiiill Hurley, Kim; Pettersen Sean
Subject: Project File 10-092-AUD-ICE iiliiiill
Hi Holly,

ati:he ·FY 10 Finalized Projects locatien-.t.ab-

m to the project file. After adding the document,

1
 If you have any questions, please let me know.
- TeamMate Coordinator
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Office oflnspector General (OIG)
Planning & Compliance Division
Office ofMam1gement
·Room- .
Phone:~
Cell:·~
.Email:

i=ro~
~~'July 13, 20111:13 PM.

Cc: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean; Hurley, Kim

. Subject: RE: Finalized Project File .
Importance: High

•I spoke with Holly about_ it. Yes, f that project file to add the. memorandum.

-·············-··-~··--···
From:
Sen~ July 13, 201112:59 PM
bS,
b6

~=~ . .
Cc: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean; Hurley, Kim
Subject: RE: Finalized Project File ·

OK.

- TeamMate Coordinator
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Office oflnspector General (OIG) ·
Planning & Compliance Division
Office of Management
Room-
Phone:~
Cell:~
2
 · Email:
l
;;;;;:;;;--·-·-·-·-----·-----·--··--·---"'."'···---~---·---··-----~-.
Sen~; July 13, 2011 12:47 PM
To:......... ·
Cc: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean; Hurley, Kim
Subject: RE: Finalized Pr6ject File·

Hello.

I would like to talk to Holly first about this request I will get back to you.

Thank you.

Policy and Comp~iance Manager

Planning and Compliance D.ivision ·.
Office oflnspector General/Office of Management
De artinent of Homeland Security

bS,
b6

From:-
Sent: We,nesda]' July 13, 201112:04 PM
To:
Cc: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean; Hurley, Kim
Subject: FW: Finalized Project File

Hi-

Holly Snow needs to add a memorandum tp 10-092-AUD-ICE FY 10 Finalized TeamMate

project fiJe. ·

Is it OK to Ms. Snow can adQ. this document?

---~--··---· .
TeamMate Coordinator
---

:Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Office of Inspector General (OIG)
Planning:& Compliance Division
Office of Management
R~om- ---
-~-

Phone:~
Cell:w=-
Email:
3
From: Snow, Holly .
Sen~, July 13, 201111:44 AM
T o : - - Pettersen, Sean ·
Subject: Re: .Finalized Project File

that's the roject file. And I would very much appreciate it if you coul!=f
·Just let me know if you need anythin~ from me.

Thanks again for your help!

Holly Snow
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
303 (bb)
303 (office)

.Fr;;~~-·--.-·- - - : - ' - - - - . · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ·

Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 201110:56 ·AM

To: Snow, Holly ·
Cc: Pettersen, Sean
Subject: RE: Fi~allzed Project Fiie

Hi Holly,
bS,
I couldn't eamMate project file in the FY 10 Finalized projects
b6
tab.

I found 10-092-AUD-ICE finalized project file FY 10 Finalized projects tab.

Js,this the project file you want

roject file to add a memo, I'll have to get

Please let me know

Once we've identified the correct file, I'll serid an emaH message to asking for.

Is this ok with you?

I'm telecommuting from home today. You can send me an email message or call me on
my Cell phone number.

- TeamMate Coordinator
Department of Homeland Security (OHS)
4
..
"
Office of Inspector General (OIG)
Planning & Compliance Division
Office of Management
Room-
.Phone:~
Cell:~
·Email:

From: Snow, Holly

~:~iliiil(' July 13, 2011 10:02 AM .
Subject: Re: Finalized Project File

Hi. .tt is in the FYlb tab, and I beli~ve the project number is I'm in training today, but I
will check my bb periodically.

Thanks for your help!

Holly Snow
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
303 (bb)
· 303- (office)
b5,
·F;;;·----""··-·····."·. .. .. ..
-·-·-·--·-·····--·-····-·:~--:----";"~-···-----·---····-·-=--··-·····~- ----··-·~------ -·~--·--·---., ---"~·-· b6
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 08:11 AM
To: Snow; Holly
Cc: Pettersen, Sean
Subject: RE: Finalized Project File· .·

Hi Holly,

Where is the project file located (FY09, FY10, FY11)?

What is the Job Code Number?

- TeamMate Coordinator
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Office of Inspector General(OIG)
Planning & Compliance Division
Offi.ce of Management ·
Room-
Phone:~
Cell:~
Email:
5
 ' .

From: Snow, Holly

Sen~ly 12, 2011 6:01 PM
To:-- .

Hi.
Cc: Pettersen, Sean · b6
Subject: Finalized Project File

I need to add a memorandum to a finalized project file in TeamMate. Would you mind helping me with
this?

Holl_ySnow
Program Analyst .
DHS-01~ Office.of Audits
Denver Field Office ·
(3o3) bb) b6
(303) (office)

6
 Email 62
~":"'-_,, .
Thind, Aneet

From: McCoy, John

Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 6:03 PM
To: 'Richards, Anne'
Subject: RE: Work papers

The question - OMG. Very tactful answer.

From: Richards, Anne mailt6:

Sen~l 6:03 PM.
To:-....... .
Subject: Re: Work papers

Okay
Does the remark about

Meet in ~he lobby at 6:45

See ya

---···-----·· ·-------··· ........,..... b5'

From: McCoy, John [mailto: p6
· Sent: Monday, July 1 -
20U 05:57 PM1
. .
To: 'Richards, Anne'
Subject: RE: Work papers

_I thought my headache was getting better.

I do want to go to dinner- thanks John

·--- ·----·-------·~~--·--- . ·-··-··-·····
From: Richards, Anne mailto:
sent: Monday, Ji.Jly 11, 2011 5:55 PM
To: Manino, Yvonne
Cc: Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel;
Subject: Re: Work papers

·That will suffice, I hope, to explain the situation to a peer reviewer.

Hope this answers your question. ·
Thank you
Anne

From: Manino, Yvonne

Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 05:44 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Work papers

Hi Anne,
1
 .' ':',•
,,
.,-' -~ -

I hope you had a good weekend.

Charles wanted me to follow up with you to

-Supervision ofAliens Commensurate with Risk, OIG-11-81(May2011) report. f!m sure this has already
been done, but with everyone's busy schedule, he wanted to rnake sure it was not overlooked.

Thanks,
b5,
· Yvonne Sy Manino b6
Acting Chief of Staff
DHS 0 the Inspector General
(Office)
(Mobile)
(Fax)

2
 Email 63
Th ind, Aneet ··

From: Richards, Anne

Sent:· · Monday, July 11, 2011 6:37 PM
To: Manino, Yvonne; Richards, An
Cc: · Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel;
Subject: Re: Work papers

Thank you

b6
'·~ •'·"' ..,..,,.,. ..,,, , .., """'.,.,...,,,_,. .
•-·-•~··--,..,,,.,..,._,_,.,.__,,.,,._, _ _ _ _ ._,___,,___ ----~~_...,_.
.
_ _ ..,,___ ,,. __, '"'·""""" •--·""~v~•.,•~--~, ...-.,...,,_...,_,...,.,.... ,.,,..,,.,,.,,.. ,...~"'''' ·--•••"•'·'' .,,,. •••""''~'

From: Manino, Yvonne

Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 06:28 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Cc: Pettersen ·Sean· Butler, Jewel;

Subject: RE: Work papers

Anne,

That~s perfect. As long as it is documented for the peer reviewer.

Thanks so much.

~Sp .Hanino-
Acting Chief ofStaff
DHS 0 the lnspecto] General
202- (Office)
202- 'Mobile b6

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 62

1
 ,_
L·
,~- DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 62

2
 Email 64 ·

Snow, Holly

From: Butler, Jewel

Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 4:03 AM
To: Pettersen, Sean; Snow, Holly
.Subject: Fw: Work papers ·

Sean, Holly,

Please ensure and confirm when this is done. See below. Thariks!
Jewel L. Butler

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 05:51 PM
To: Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel
Subject: Fw: Work papers

See below
Thanks

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 62
 Email 65

Snow, Holly

From: Butler, Jewel

Sent: . Tuesday, July 12, 20114:06 AM
. To: Pettersen, Sean; Snow, Holly
Subject: Fw: Work papers

Disrega.rd the first.;.see Anne's reply below and let me know when the record of decision is done and uploaded;
Jewel L. Butler
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 62

1
 .. "..::..
Email 66

Snow, Holly

From: Snow, Holly

Sent:' Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:49 AM
To: Pettersen, Sean · ·
Subject: FW: Work papers

I meant to CC you on this ...

·Holl_y Snow
Program Analyst
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
(303) (bb)
.<~.°--~ ..(£ffl~~x---·-·-..--·-----..---------..-----·-----··---·-·-·-----..·--·--·---.. .- . . . . .,. . .
From: Snow, Holly
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 201111:48 AM .
To: Butler, Jewel
Subject: RE: Work papers

Jewel · ·. · · · ·
Sorry for the delay on this-I ha.cl to have~n-firialize the project. The project file is
1

located in the FY2010 finalized projects (10-:092-AUD-ICE). I uploaded the record of decision to
TeamMate in AS4.d. l also included a copy of the r.evised report in AS4.e arid the distribution email in b
6
AS4.f. Once you have signed off on these, I will finalize the project again. Please let me know ifI need to
do anything else. ·

Also, I should have my response to the FOIA request compiled by COB today.

Thanks,

Holl_ySnow
Program Analyst
DHS·OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
(303) bb)
-~~~~)

1
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL.

2
 Email 67

Thind, Aneet
From: Pettersen,. Sean
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 11 :23 AM
To: Richards, Anne .
Subject: Re: Proposed Agenda for Juiy 21st CRCL Committee Meeting

Ann~ . .
I'm traveiing today, but the team has started preparing answers to these questions. I'll be in DC next week and have a
meeting @ 9:30 and an exit with CBP@ 1. . .

Please see agenda items and questions on Supervision of Aliens. We will need to put together answers.
We will talk. about ti.ming on Tuesday
Thanks
.Anne

From: Mann, Carlton

Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 05:19 PM .
To: Richards, Anne; Reback, Richard; Edwards, Charles; Frost, Thomas
Cc: Outten-Mills, Deborah; Bell, Mark; Gaughran, James; Manino, Yvonne; McCoy, John
Subject: FW: Proposed Agenda for July 21st CRCL Committee Meeting ·

Attached is the·NGO's agenda for next week's meeting. I believe We should meet Wednesday
(7 /20} for a quick prep. Thanks ....

Carl

·--··--·---0•·-·----·- - b5 I

F r o m : - mailto b6
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:10 PM
To: nn · Carlton
Cc:
Subject: Proposed Agenda for July 21st CRCL Committee Meeting

. Dear Carl,

I'm attaching our proposed agenda for the July 21st CRCL Committee meeting with the OIG. Please confirm receipt ofthi
message. You'll note that we've only listed 11 NGo' and inter-governmental participants. We have interest from 2 other.
NGO representatives. Neither has a specific agenda item to raise but would like to observe and weigh in as appropriate.
a
Can you make an exception and allow 13-person meeting this time? We understa.nd if not and can ask one of the two
to bow out.

5
We will see you at 10 am, Thursday, July 21 \ at

• 1
b6

2
 Email 68
Thind, Aneet

From.: Butler, Jewel

Sent: . ~ 2011 4:51 PM
To:
Subject: FW: Media Week In· Review

FOIA from Linda

/~Q@'~ b6

Chief of Audit Operations

Office of Inspector General- O'ffice of Audits
US Department of Homeland Security
Office Phone: (202)
Business Fax: (202)
Business Cell: . 202
E-mail:
From: Richards, ,A.nne
Sent: Tuesday, ,July 19, 2011 4:50 PM
To: Butler, Jewel
Subject: FW: Media Week In Review

Linda's response to the FOIA request

From: Howard, Linda

Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:49 PM
to: Richards, Anne
Subject: FW: Media Week In Review

. Anne,
Here is the one you sentto me and my response.
Linda

Linda R. Howard
Director
U.S; Department of Homeland Security
Office of lmmector General -Audits
Phone: (713
BB: (713) b6
Fax: (713)

From: Howard, Linda

Sent: Tuesday,July OS, 201111:36 AM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: Re: Media Week In Review .

I will look. Well timed on someone's part. Hope this week is. more calm.

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Tuesday, July OS, 2011 11:07 AM
To: Howard, Linda

1
 •!·

Subject:: FW: Media Week In Review

Check out the articles on ICE - came from Sean's Supervision of Aliens report. You all missed a fun day on Friday

---··---------·-----------·---······,,··--""••
From: Metelko; .Marty
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201111:07 AM
To: AIGs
Cc: Mccarron, William; b6
Subject: Media Week In Review

As promised:

SYNOPSIS
• The OIG was featured in a wide spe~trum Of outlets, from ~egional to national, including security and political
themed biogs. ·

KEY QUOTES
• None

TWITTER/SLOGS/Ere.
• Aviation Week: GAO Studies Security at-GA Airports By Kerry .Lynch
· • . Jewis~ Telegraphic Agency: U.S. immigration includes Israel on watch list

PRESS COVERAGE

ICE
CNSNews, U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote. Produce, or Protect' Terrorists; Also Calls
Israel Anti-Terror Partner By Edwin Mora
June 29, 2011. In an implicit admission that Israel is so threatened by terrorism that it is not only surrounded by countries
and territories that produce terrorists but also unwillingly harbors terrorists within its own territory in a way that most other .
nations in the world do not, the Obama administration is currently listing Israel among 36 "specially designated countries"
it believes "have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or.their members."
*Also reposted in Fox News, Newsmax.com.
World Tribune, On U.S. list of countries which 'promote, produce, or protect' terrorists: All of Middle East
July 1, 2011. WASHINGTON -The United States has deemed that the entire Middle East, including leading allies, were
·harboring insurgents. ·

. Project Shield
Chicago Sun-Times, Preckwinkle axes troubled 'Project Shield'"CBy Carol Marin and Dori Moseley'
June 30, 2011. Seven years and $44 million questionably spent federal dollars later, Cook County Board President Toni
Preckwinkle on Thursday pulled the plug on "Project Shield," a failed Homeland Security program initiated and continued
by her two predecessors, John and Todd Stroger. ·
Chicago Tribune, Cook County scraps faulty policy car camera program By Erikka Slife
June 30, 2011. Cook County officials on Thursday pulled the plug on a troubled $44 million effort that left faulty cameras
in police cars. ·

Examiner.com, Controversial post 9111 program nixed By Cynthia Hodges

·July 1, 2011. On Thursday, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle and Michael Masters,· the new Cook County
Department of Homeland Security Chief announced a decision to can "Project Shield," a failed Homeland Security
program initiated under John Stroger.

2
 Page 1of1
Email 69

From: DHS-OIG Office of Public Affairs

Sent: Monday, July 25, 201111:55 AM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: Media Inquiry Regarding Report -- Supervision of Aliens Commensurate
With Risk

From: --OnBehalfOf-
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 4:31 PM
To: DHS-OIG, GPA
Subject: Re: Media Inquiry Regarding Report -- Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk

Thank you for your time. I will make sure to follow up with ICE. I don't see h.ow you are unable to b6
. answer some of those questions. ICE already responded to the report's findings and I don't see what
· else they can add, but I will report exactly what the OIG audit says. Thank you.

7/26/2011
 Page 1 of I
Email 70

From: DHS-OIG Office of Public Affairs

Sent: Monday, July 25, 201111:55 AM ·
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: Media Inquiry Regarding Report -- Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk

.. ............. -~---····:·:·-·-----·----···----·-···----------··------..:.. .• _.-·----·-"-··"••··-····--··---····-·--· ........... ..

From: ~OnBehalfOf ·
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 2:50 PM ·
To: DHS-OIG, GPA .
Subject: Media Inquiry Regarding Report -- Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk
b6
Hello,

I hope all is well. My name i s - a n d I'm with CNSNews.com. I just have a few questions regarding
the recent OIG report entitled -- Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk.

Questions:

ICE does not screen all aliens against the Terrorist Watchlist including those incarcerated (non-detained), taken
into their custody, and released?

Is it safe to say that they do not screen the majority of ERO's Alien Population against the Terrorist Watchlist
since the majority are released?

ICE did not perfo11n the required Third Agency Check (TAC) for 105, 359 (99 percent) of the population
of aliens from specially designated countries as of September 30, 2009, which include incarcerated aliens (non-
detained) and those released under supervision correct?

Regarding the federal, state, and local incarcerated "non-detained" aliens, are they released into the U.S. after
completing their sentence?

Is it safe to say that all non-detained aliens that are incarcerated (non-detained) have committed other crimes c
besides coming to the country illegally?

Now the OIG reviewed 59 cases files ofreleased aliens out of 1.5 million and found that ICE failed to perform .
an NCIC check (terrorist watchlist) against 2 (3% of the 59) who were confirmed as not being known or.
suspected terrorists. Is it accurate to generalize that about 3 percen of the 1.5 million were not screened against
NCIC? Does the OIG have any reason to believe that ICE may have released individuals who were known or
suspected terrorists? ·

The OIG also reviewed 116 cases of aliens from SDCs and found that ICE did not perform a TAC on 4 (7%) of
the 56 cases requiring a TAC. Again is it accurate to generalize that ICE did not perform a TAC on about 7
of
percent the cases that required a TAC?

Last question is ICE the only agency that uses the SDC list?? I've never heard of it before.

l know I am asking for a lot. I am hoping you can answer as many as you can by 5 p.m: I look forward to
hearing from someone. Take care.

b6

7/26/2011
 Page 1of1
Email 71

From:
·Sent: Monday, July 25, 201112:22 PM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: Press Release
Attachments: 07-08-11 Press Release - OIG-11-81 (Draft).docx

Hi Marty,

All my other emails regarding 11-81 had you as the main POC while I was CCd- do I still need to provide all those
emails to you? Or, is that a question for Aneet? Just let me know when you have a moment!

-
Thanks!

To:
Subject: Press Release

All: Just want to give everyone a quick "heads-up" that we will be issuing a Press Release on
Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk, OIG-11-81. Yvonne has the release now and has bS,
asked that we re-issue the report to those who originally received the report.
b6
Yvonne has asked PCD to send us an Information Gopy of the Press Release so we have the exact
wording that we can then use to send out th.e report.

I wanted to give everyone the "heads-up" that this is comin

eye out for the info. when we receive. I'm not sure

That said, what I will do

Again, just a "heads-up" so everyone's aware of this issue.· Here's the draft Press Release, so you·
have an idea of the issue ..

Contact me if you have any questions, thanks.-Marty

Marta Rivera Metelko

Director, Public Affairs
Office of Inspector General
Dep · Hom~urity
202 .111111111
Fax: 202.

7/26/2011
 Page 1of4
Email 72

From:
Sent: Monday, July 25, 201112:29 PM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: CNSNEWS: U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce
or Protect' Terrorists; Also Calls Israel Anti-Terror Partner ·

................ -...__---····--·····--···-·-·---··-··--·-·-----·-·--------···------··----···-·-··-···--·-------··---··-···-·-.. ···--··

From:--- ·
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 20111:38 PM · b5,
To: Metelko, Marty b6
Subject: CNSNEWS: U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce, or Protect'Terrorists;
Also Calls Israel Anti-Terror Partner · ·

Hi Marty,

I found this article highlighting a recent OIG report, "Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk." Although
traditional coverage has remained relatively light, the blogosphere and social media outlets have latched onto
it. Once we have it might be worthwhile to think about how
Thinking of·

CNSNews: U.S. Designates Israel as Country That Tends 'To Promote, Produce, or Protect' Terrorists; Also Calls
Israel Anti-Terror Partner
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
By Edwin Mora

(CNSNews.coni) - In an implicit admission that Israel is so threatened by terrorism that it is not only surrounded
by countries and territories that produce terrorists but also unwillingly harbors terrorists within its own territory
in a way that most other nations in the world do not, the Obama administration is currently listing Israel among
36 "specially designated countries" it believes "have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist
organizations or their members."

Also included on the list--separately from lsrael--are the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza, as
well as Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, the four nations bordering Israel.

All but five of the nations included on the administration's "specially designated country'' list have majority
Muslim populations (see the list below).

The five countries on the list that do not have majority Muslim populations--Kazakhstan (47 percent Muslim),
Eritrea (36.5 percent Muslim), Israel (16.9 percent Muslim), the Philippines (5 percent Muslim) and Thailand (4.6
percent)--have had internal. problems with radical Muslim terrorists, as reported by the State Department. The
State Department has designated Eritrea as a country that is "not cooperating fully" with U.S. anti-terrorism
efforts.

The Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General published the list of "specially designated
countries" as an appendix to an unclassified May 11 report--"Supervision of Aliens Commensurate With Risk"--
that was publicly posted on the Internet. (The appendix is on page 18 of the document.)

As a matter of policy, according to the inspector general's report, citizens of Israel and other "specially
designated countries" are subjected to a special security screening called a "Third Agency Check" (TAC) when
they are actually detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the division of the Department of

7/26/2011
 Page 2of4

Homeland Security responsible for enforcing the immigration laws.

ICE officers are supposed to check all aliens they take into custody against the Terrorist Watchlist, which
includes the identities of individuals the U.S. government knows or reasonably suspects to be terrorists. When
ICE holds a citizen from a "specially designated country" in its own detention facilities, according to the agency's
standing policy, the individual is also supposed to be run through a TAC.

"In addition to the Terrorist Watch list screening, ICE uses a Third Agency Check (TAC) to screen aliens from
specially designated countries (SDCs) that have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist
organizations or their members," says the inspector general's report.

"The purpose of the additional screening is to determine whether other agencies have an interest in the alien,"
says the report. "ICE's policy requires officers to conduct TAC screenings only for aliens from socs if the aliens
are in ICE custody. As a result, ICE does not perform a TAC for the majority of its population of aliens, which
includes those incarcerated or released under supervision."

The inspector general recommended in the report that ICE change its screening policy "to require officers to
conduct TAC screenings for all aliens from SOCs, not just those held in ICE detention facilities."

"ICE's current TAC policy is ineffective because ICE does not perform a TAC for 99% of the population of aliens
from socs," said the inspector general's report. "According to ICE, TACs have resulted in high-profile.
prosecutions of suspected terrorists."

In its official response to the report, ICE objected to this recommendation by the inspector general because the
agency says it does not have sufficient resources to do TACs on all aliens from the specially designated countries.

Even though the administration includes Israel among "specially designated countries" that it believes "have
shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members," ICE Spokeswoman
Gillian Christensen told CNSNews.com that the U.S. also considers Israel, as well as some other countries on the
"specially designated countries" list, as partners in the struggle against terrorism.

"The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in
01,1r efforts to combat global terrorism," Christensen said in a written statement. "Countries may have been
included on the list because of ttie backgrounds of arrestees, not because of the country's government itself."

"The United States maintains close intelligence-sharing relationships with many of these countries in orderto
address security issues within their own borders and in our mutual pursuit of safety and security around the
globe," said Christensen. ·

ICE declined to say who put Israel on the list or when Israel was put there. However, in her written statement,
ICE spokeswoman Christensen said the "specially designated country" list had been created "at least" seven
years ago--which would have been during the presidency of George W. Bush--and that ICE was not responsible
for creating it.

"This list of countries has been in existence for at least seven years," said Christensen. "Further, ICE does not
issue such designations. As the OIG report notes, the purpose of the additional screening is to determine
whether other agencies have an interest in the alien ICE has in custody."

However, on Mar. 4, 2008, the McClatchy Newspapers published a report--"Law enforcement officials secretly
profiling immigrants"--that cited a memo from Ted Stark, a supervisory special agent with ICE's Office of

7/26/2011
 Page 3of4

Intelligence, that proposed creating a single federal list of "special interest" countries (plus the West Bank and
Gaza) to aid federal agencies in screening aliens.

"So many federal agencies have created different lists that U.S. officials contemplated adopting a single one to
streamline the process,· Stark wrote," said the McClatchey report. "The proposed list, which officials said had yet
to be adopted, includes 35 countries, most with significant Muslim or Arab populations."

"The group of agencies--which included ICE, the National Security Agency and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection--not only recommended one list but also suggested an interagency definition of 1special interest
alien,"' said the Mcclatchey report. "Under the proposal, a special interest alien would be an immigrant with
terrorist ties or an immigrant who by nationality, 'ethnicity or other factors may have ties or sympathies' with
the listed country."

The 35 countries plus the West Bank and Gaza that were on the proposed list discussed in the ICE memo
uncovered by Mcclatchey in March 2008 almost exactly m~tches the "specially designated countries" on the list
published by the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General on May 11, 2011. There are
only two differences: North Korea was on the list proposed in 2008; it is not on the May 2011 list. Israel was not
on the list proposed in 2008; it is on the May 2011 list.

The State Department currently lists only four countries as "state sponsors of terrorism," meaning they "have
repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism." These state sponsors of terror are Iran, Sudan,
Syria, and Cuba. Iran, Sudan and Syria are all listed along with Israel on the "specially designated countries" list
published by the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General on May 11. Iran, Sudan and
Syria are also all majority Muslim countries.

Cuba, the one state sponsor of terror that does not share a place with Israel on the administration's "specially
designated countries" list, was 85 percent Roman Catholic when the Castro regime took power, according to the
CIA World Factbook. It also had Protestant, Jewish, Jehovah Witness and Santeria populations, says the CIA.
Accordin'g to the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, however, Cuba currently has only a very small Muslim
population that equals only one-tenth of one percent of the total Cuban population.

CNS News, com contacted the offices of Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, both of whom served as secretary of
Homeland Security during the Bush administration, to ask if the department had listed Israel among "specially
designated countries" during their tenures. Neither Ridge nor Chertoff responded.

SPECIALLY DESIGNATED COUNTRIES

Here are the countries and territories on the "specially designated-country"-list published on May
10,, 2011 by the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General. Except for Somalia
and Yemen, the CIA 's World Factbook is the source ~or each country's Muslim population
percentage. For Somalia and Yemen, the source is the Pew Research Center's 2009 report,
"Mapping the Global Muslim Population."
Country or Territory Muslim Population
Mauritania 100 percent
Saudi 100
Turkey 99.8
Gaza Strip 99.3
Yemen 99.1

7/26/2011
 Page 4of4

Afghanistan 99
Algeria 99
Morocco 98.7
Somalia 98.5
Tunisia 98
Iran 98
Iraq 97
Libya 97
United Arabs Emirates 96
Uzbekistan 96
Djibouti 94
Pakistan. 95
Jordan 92
Tajikistan 90
Egypt 90
Bangladesh 89.5
Turkmenistan 89
Indonesia 86.1
Kuwait 85
Bahrain 81.2
Qatar 77.5
West Bank 75
Oman 75
Syria 74
Sudan 70
Malaysia 60.4
Lebanon 59.7
Kazakhstan 47
Eritrea 36.5
Israel 16.9
Philippines 5
Thailand 4.6

b6

7/26/2011
 Email 73

~~~~:~-~~~1
To: '
3:45 PM
subject: RE: OIG-11-81 "supervision of Aliens commensurate with Risk"
You don't need to attribute the statement to me- please use DHS OIG or The
office of Inspector General.
Thanks so much for checking! I look forward to working with you as well.
Thank you!

-----oriainal Messag~---­
From: 1 111 1[ma1lto:
sen~s, 2011 3:39 PM
To:---- b5,
Subject: Re: OIG-11-81 "supervision of Aliens commensurate with Risk"
b6
seems clear to me. I will included in my piece, which should go up by
5 today. CNSNews.com. Thank you so much for getting back to me and I look
forward to working with you .. I can attribute this to you correct?? TAke care.

>
>
> Washington, oc - The office of Inspector General (OIG) has been
> advised that ICE incorrectly included Israel in a list of countries
> subjett to Third Agency checks. This list was provided to the OIG
> during the course of its audit, supervision of Aliens commensurate
> with Risk, OIG~ll-81 (May 2011) and included in Appendix D. · .
> Accordingly, the OIG has revised Appendix D and reposted the report.
>The OIG appreciates the Department's effort to correct the record promptly.
> .
>
>
> Best,

~-
>
>
>
>
>
> Public Affairs specialis~
>
>office of the Inspector General
>
> riepartmeht of Homeland s~curity
>
>
~Direct: 202.11111111
>
Page 1
 FW o~supervision of Aliens commensurate with Risk
> BlackBerry: 202.~ b6
>
>"

Page 2
From:
Sent: Monday, July 25, 201112:16 PM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: FW: DHS OIG 11-81 Supervision of Aliens with Commensurate Risk.

From:
Sen~l 4:36 PM
To:----
Subject: OHS OIG 11-81 Supervision of Aliens with Commensurate Risk.

Hi-
b6
Thank you for contacting the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General regarding report 11
81, Supervision of Aliens Commensurate with Risk.

Any questions regarding policy of the administration should be directed to the Department of Homeland
Security at 202.282.8010. The Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General believes that our ·
reports stand on their own. Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to ask.

-
Thank you,

Public Affairs Specialist

Office of the Inspector General
De artment of Homeland Security

7/26/2011
 Ema·i175

Edwards, Charles

From: Kroloff, Noah • • • • •

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:23 AM
To: Edwards, Charles; Kroloff, Noah; Sahdweg, John
Subject: Re: ICE; supervison of aliens commensurate with risk

Ok. Many thanks, charles. This was an ice issue, not with oig.

From: Edwards, Charles [ m a i l t o : -

Sent: Friday, July O~ ·
To: Kroloff, Noah <~; Sandweg, John <
Subject: RE: ICE supervison of aliens c;:ommensurate with risk

Gentlemen;
. .
Based on the press release from ICE, I am posting a corrected version of the report with Israel being removed from the
TAC list.

Thanks,

Charles

Charles Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of Inspector General b5,
Department of Homeland Security
b6
From: Edwards, Charles
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 5:09 PM
To: 'Kroloff, Noah'
Subject: ICE supervison of aliens commensurate with risk

Hi Noah,

Thanks,

1
Charles

Charles Edwards
Acting Inspector General
Office Of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security

2
 U.S. Department of Homeland Security
500 12'11 Street, S.W., STOP 5009
Washington, DC 20536-5009

U.S. Immigration
and Customs
Enforcement

September 20, 2011

RE: ICE FOIA Case Number 2011FOIA14096

DHS OIG FOIA Case Number 2011-144

This is in response to your Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) request to the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Office of the Inspector General (OIG), dated July 8, 2011.

In a memorandum dated September 15, 2011, DHS OIG referred your request and twenty (20)
responsive pages of documents to ICE for review, processing, and direct response to you.

After review, I have determined that portions of those documents will be withheld pursuant to
Exemptions 6, 7(C) and 7(E) of the FOIA as described below.

FOIA Exemption 6 exempts from disclosure personnel or medical files and similar files the release
of which would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This requires a balancing
of the public's right to disclosure against the individual's right privacy. The types of documents
and/or information that we have withheld may consist of social security numbers, home addresses,
dates of birth, or various other documents and/or information belonging to a third party that are
considered personal. The privacy interests of the individuals in the records you have requested
outweigh any minimal public interest in disclosure of the information. Any private interest you may
have in that information does not factor into the aforementioned balancing test.

FOIA Exemption 7(C) protects records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes that
could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This
exemption takes particular note of the strong interests of individuals, whether they are suspects,
witnesses, or investigators, in not being unwarrantably associated with alleged criminal activity.
That interest extends to persons who are not only the subjects of the investigation, but those who
may have their privacy invaded by having their identities and information about them revealed in
connection with an investigation. Based upon the traditional recognition of strong privacy interest in
law enforcement records, categorical withholding of information that identifies third parties in law
enforcement records is ordinarily appropriate. As such, I have determined that the privacy interest in
the identities of individuals in the records you have requested clearly outweigh any minimal public
interest in disclosure of the information. Please note that any private interest you may have in that
information does not factor into this determination.

www.ice.gov
FOIA Exemption 7(E) protects records compiled for law enforcement purposes, the release of
which would disclose techniques and/or procedures for law enforcement investigations or
prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such
disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law. I have determined that
disclosure of certain law enforcement sensitive information contained within the responsive records
could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law. Additionally, the techniques and
procedures at issue are not well known to the public.

Please be advised that additional portions of these documents have been withheld by DHS OIG.
Should you wish to appeal DHS OIG's determinations, please reference DHS OIG's appeal
instructions in their September 15, 2011 response letter.

You have the right to appeal our withholding determination. Should you wish to do so, you must
send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this letter to: U.S.
Immigration Customs Enforcement, Office of Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, Freedom oflnformation Office, 500 lih Street, S.W., Stop 5009 Washington,
D.C. 20536-5009, following the procedures outlined in the DHS regulations at 6 C.F.R. § 5.9. Your
envelope and letter should be marked "FOIA Appeal." Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are
available at www.dhs.gov/foia.

Provisions of the FOIA allow us to recover part of the cost of complying with your request. In this
instance, because the cost is below the $14 minimum, there is no charge. 1

If you need to contact our office about this matter, please refer to FOIA case number
2011FOIA14096. This office can be reached at (202) 732-0600 or (866) 633-1182.

Sincerely,

~ f~p...
Catrina M. Pavlik-Keenan
FOIA Officer

Enclosures: Your July 8, 2011 FOIA Request

I 6 CFR § 5.l l(d)(4).

www.ice.gov
 Page 1 of2
Em-ail 17

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201111:31 AM
To: 'Gonzalez, Barbara'; Metelko, Marty
Cc: ; Hale, Brian P
Subject: RE: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk

Thanks- this is helpful.

b6

----------1V'll3rta-Rive1a-MeMlkb
Director, Public Affairs
Office of Inspector General
Department of Homeland Security
202. 1202.
Fax: 202.

From: Gonzalez, Barbara 1b)\6) (hl(7)< ICE

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:30 AM

To: Metelko, Marty
Cc: Norris, Rachael; Hale, Brian P
Subject: RE: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk
Portion
Also, here is our statement on the matter. for ICE
review
"The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have .links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in our
efforts to combat global terrorism. Further, ICE does not issue such designations. As the OIG report notes, the and
purpose of the additional screening is to determine whether other agencies have an interest in the alien ICE has response
in custody. This li~s been in existence for at least seven years; countries may have been
included on the li~backgrounds of arrestees, not because of the country's government itself. The to
.United States maintains close intelligence-sharing relationships with many of these countries in order to address
security issues within their own borders and in our .mutual pursuit of safety and security around the globe."
I reques-:
ter.

Barbara Gonzalez
·11

1
Press Secretary 1
lJ.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (1CE) J1
202 (office) ·
305 ·m'!(cell) 1

From: Metelko, Marty [!n_gHt~- __ . . _ _ _ _ J

'""'" "l
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201110:11 AM b6
To: Gonzalez, Barbara
Cc:
Subject: FW: ICE supervision of aliens commensurate with risk
J
Hi Barbara: This is Marty Metelko from the OHS OIG. I just sent this to Kelly and received her "out of office."
also left you a voicemail.

Let me know if there's anything you may need from me.-Marty

7/26/2011
 Page 2 of2

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 16

7/26/2011
 Email 22

Thirid, Aneet
From: Reback, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:21 PM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: .RE: On being a "former" .....

Thanks, RR

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 3:41 PM
To: Reback, Richard; Richards, Anne; Edwards, Charles
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

r FYI -- Here's the statement that ICE is making on this issue:

"The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in our efforts on
to combat global terrorism. Further, ICE does not issue such designations. As the OIG report notes, the purpose of the
additional screening is to determine whether other agencies have an interest in the alien ICE has in custody. This list of for
countries has been in existence for at least seven years; countries may have been included on the list because of the I CE
backgrounds of arrestees, not because of the country's government itself. The United States maintains close intelligence- .
1
sharing relationships with many of these countries in order to address security issues within their own borders and in our review
mutual pursuit of safety and security around the globe."

Barbara Gonzalez
Press Secretary
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
202 (office)
j
305 ••:•P'ccell)

From: Reback, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:57 AM
To: Metelko, Marty
Subject: AN: On being a "former" .....

1
bUPLICATE OF EMAIL 20

2
 Email 23

thind, Aneet
b6
From:
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:50 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: On being a "former" .....

Here is a brochure put together by AIPAC on US-Israeli Homeland Security Cooperation ...

http:Uwww.aipac.org/Why%201srael/N?meclra?J5U6TfCatiOriS:OlaZiVliWatea%·znoocuments/Ror'fielana-secill'ity.pdf

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:42 PM·
To: Metelko, Marty; Reback, Richard; Edwards, Charles
Cc: Bell, Mark; Butler, Jewel; Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean;
Subject: RE: On eing a former ... .. · b5,
b6

Thanks
Anne
J

From: Metelko, Marty

Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:22 PM
To: Reback, Richard· Edwards Charles
Cc: Richards, Anne; bE>
Subject: RE: On being a "former" ......
Importance: High

ICE's Press Secretary just sent me the following:

Here is an updated statement based on new information we. received.

Portion "The addition of Israel in the OIG's list of ICE's "Third-Agency Checks" (TAC) was based on inaccurate information
for provided to the OIG during the course of its audit. The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have
· links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in our efforts to combat global terrorism. The United States
ICE
maintains close intelligence-sharing relationships with Israel in order to address security issues within its own
review borders and in our mutual pursuit of safety and security around the globe"

Barbara Gonzalez
Press Secretary
J
1
 r Portion for
I, .. U . S . n and Customs Epforeement (ICE) ICE.
.I m . .
1 305
~~>
cell) ·· · J review
L
Not sure but not sure we have any recourse.-Marty b5

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 20

2
. -------- --~-,- - - - - - - - ··-··----··- - - - - - - - - - - -

Email3
'
"·

Snow, Holly

From: Snow, Holly

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:56 PM
To: ·Bell, Mark
Subject: FW: bid we specifically get
Attachments: TAC Procedure Memo.pdf

FYI-this is the first email I sent Anne ....

From: Snow, Holly

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:35 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: Did we specifically get

-described in the att~ched ICE procedure memora~dum from Acting Director Victor Cerda
(D.12. 7 in TeamMate). · ·

Holl,y Snow
Program Analyst b5,
DHS-OIG Office·of Audits
Denver Field Office
b6

g~~). .~~f:ic~)_
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:23 PM
To: Bell, Mark; Snow, Holly
Subject: FW: Did we specifically get

The question wasn't just about

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 4:16 PM
To: Snow, Holly
Subject: Did we specifically get

1
 {. t.

Office ofDe_re11do11 a111l Ke11111P11l Operarfom

U.S. DepRrtment of Homela:nd Security
425 1Slreel, NW · .·
. Washington, DC 20536

U.S. Immigration
-a:ni:i-crrstom~s~------
. Enforcement

MEMOR,ANDUM FO~:

FROM:

SUBJECT: hnp~oveinents in Third Agency Check Procedures

Purpose

· The pU!pose ~f this. memorandum is to reiterate Third Agency Check (TAC) Procedures and to
. responseprocedur~.
inform the field of improvements in E;eadquarteJ,"s TAC .
Background
. . .
· · ·: ·-~-- ··:· --·-·Tiie-~veiits._bfSeptemberTf;2001·ie<I iheuDifedstateS'-oovemme~Tfci'ilientif'Y certaiicoliiitries·-----.. -.--· ~- --.---- ·
. that have show.ri. a tendency tQ promote, produce o~ protect terrorist organizations and/or their. . .
· .. m.embe;t's. These events proVided' the impetus for the Designation ofNational Security Matters
}4emorandum of De6~~er 18, 2002. . . . . ·
. .
On. Oct 003, Chapter.19, ·section 3~-(attached) was adde~ to the Detention ahd Deportation
0 cer's Field Manual CP:PFM) arid reflects the re·quirement to conduct TACs.fo:r nationals of
Specially Designated Countries. The list of designated countries is. contahied inAppendiX 19-16 of
the.DDFM entitled S:peci:fioaliy Designated Countries {SDC). ·- · ·
' '. • t ••
' . . . . . .
Guidance on New Procedures for Conducting Third Agency· Checks (attached) was forwarded to the
field on March 24, 2004. The new procedi:ires·.for c9ndtictirig the TAC was imple~ented in an effort.
. .\
·to streamline the TAC pioc~ss, reduce du_p,lication, ancl inerease res,ponse time. · :

piscussion
....
Recently, HQDRO noted delays in TAC response time by HQIN'T. HQDRO and HQiNT have been
working diligently t~ address this problem and have agreed on a plan to remedy this. situation. .
HQDRO anticipates a marked ~piove!l).ent in TAC. response"time :I>Y October 11, 2004. Note that·
' . <. r

Subject: .Improvements in Third Agency Check Procedµres .

Page2

al~ough TACs mayTequire ten to ·fifteen working days for completion, most are resolved in four to
seven days.

The improved Headquarters procedures will noi resolye TAC response delays resulting from
submissions in the wrong fonnat .or submissions when removal oi: rel~ase is imminent. Field Office
Dfrectors are· reminded that TAC requests must be submitted at the time the alien is· taken into
custody, :t:lOt upon release ouemoval.. Furthennore, Field Office Directors are instructed to submit
TACs in the approved electronic format"distributed in conjunction With this memorand~. ·

HQDRO will continue to mollitor the TAC procedl.ll'eS and res onse time: Sh6uld ou have any
ques.tions regarding TACs, please direct (hem to • • • • • • • HQDRO
Intelligence Unit.
. ·,·

Attachment

l.

..•

I
 Email 39

Snow, Holly

From: Richards, Anne

Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:45 PM
To: Snow, Holly
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks
~1
Personally, I think But, wh.at do 1l<now.
Again
Thanks for your help.
.. . b5
From: Snow, Holly
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:46 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

-bably I am surprised that

J
From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:24 PM
To: Snow, Holly ·
Cc: Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Holly· ·. . · Portion
The memo you sent us on Friday was dated October 8, 2003 and It contained "effective immediately" language in it. 50 for
[ that would support the interview, but it doesn't prove a start date. .
J
ICE ·
Thanks for your help review
Anne

From: Snow, Holly

Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:25 PM
To: Richards, Anne
Cc: Pettersen, Sean; Butler, Jewel
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

_Ann~ . . , .
Unfortunately, I cannot say for certain when the TAC screenings began. We obtained 2 policy memos. Port ion I
One of the policy memorandums, issued by the acting director is titled "Improvements in Third Agency for · ·
Check Procedures," but it is not dated. Another tnemo from the Director of the Detention and Removal I ICE
I Office, titled "New Procedures for Conducting Third Agency Checks" is dftted March 24, 2004.
1
review j
lrn an interview, ICE told us that the undated policy went into effect on 10/03/03.
L
·.

t""ioll_y Snow
Program Analyst
DHS-OIG Office of Audits
Denver Field Office
 From: Richards, Anne
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:55 PM
To: Snow, Holly; Pettersen, Sean
Cc: Butler, Jewel
Subject: PN: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks
Importance: High

Do we know when See email below.

Thanks
Anne

. . . . I
..........-...- - - - - ·..C-·-··-···•·--··-····••-·······--·-··--··---·--··-··"'-·-·:---:-····•··-···--·-.-···-·-·-·-----·-••··--····•··:._:_...- ..- ..- . .- .. 1.
From: ·
1
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:46.PM . ·
To: Richards, Anne
Subject: PN: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks 'b5,
1
Importance: High
I b6

Anne,

Will you please help me a I

.I
bosswantedtoknow ... ;:·in other wd:rds;'
. Fors.ome reason,
THANK YOU.
-

From: Kaguyutan, Janice inail

~~~t: ThursdaYr July 07, 2011 3:33 PM

Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Let me clarify. I just heard back from

-But,

From: [mailto:
. Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:29 PM
To: Kaguyutan, Janice
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Got it. let me see what I can find out for you. Will be in touch.

From: Kaguyutan, Janice mail :

Sen~29PM
To:----.·
Subject: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

Hi --Thanks for taking my call. My boss wanted to know

In other words,
info!

Janice
2
,·

Janice V. Kaguyutan
Deputy Chief Counsel
Democratic Staff
Howard L. Berman, Ranking Member
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
{202) 226-8467.

THE INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL. This emailmessage, including any attachment, contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose. if you are not the named and intended recipient, or have had this email or
an attachment forwarded to you, you are not to read it or any attachment, are prohibited from disseminating and/or copying it,
should call us immediately at 202-226-8467, and delete it· and any attachment from your system.

3
 Email 41

Thind, Aneet

From: b6
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:55 PM
To: Richards, Anne ·
Subject: RE: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

THANKS. Let me know either way please.

From: Richards, Anne

~~~t: Thursday, July 07, 20113:53 PM
Subject: RE: O!G-11-81 Third Agency Checks
lJ 86

[
~nt you the memo dated Oct 8, 2003 that is the earliest description I have. I will forward the request to the
to see if there is anything earlier.
Thanks
team-I~~;
JReview
·
Anne

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 3 9·

I
I
I
I

1
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39
I ~ '-'

2
Thind, Aneet
From:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:50 PM.
To: Edwards, Charles
Cc: Manino, Yvonne
Subject: FW: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks
Attachments: TAC:pdf

Charles, below is Anne's response. Also, please see attached. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. b6

•
Thx,
I
!
- j.
From: Richards, Anne I
Sent: Thursday, July. 07, 2011 4:29 PM
To:
Subject: FVV: OIG-11-81 Third Agency Checks

b6
We can't determine when it. started. As I have already
. we
sent you,. have the memo from October 2003. We also have For 1
an interview memo that indicates it started in October 2003. But other documents are undated or labeled in an unclear ICE.
manner. · . revi-
. ew
Thanks
Anne

DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

1
·DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

2
DUPLICATE OF EMAIL 39

3
 U.S. Immigration
and Customs
Enforce1nent
HQDRO 50/12.8
Office of the Director 8011 Street NW
Washington, DC 20536

October 8, 2003

MEMORANDUM Deputy Assistant Directors

FOR: Field Office Directors

FROM: Anthony S. Tangeman

Director
Office of Detention and Removal

SUBJECT: Addition of Chapter 19, Section 33 (Third Agency Checks for all Specially
Designated Countries) to the Detention and Deportation Officer's Field Manual
(DDFM)

The DDFM is changed to reflect the addition of Section 33, Chapter 19. Accordingly, the
DDFM is changed as follows:

19.33 Third Agency Checks for all Specially Designated Countries

I. Discussion

The events of September 11, 2001 have led the United States Government to identify
certain countries that have shown a tendency to promote, produce or protect terrorist
organizations and/or their members. That list of designated countries is contained in
Appendix 19-16 entitled Specially Designated Countries (SOC). It is imperative that all
officers consult the list to determine if an alien's country of citizenship or nationality is
listed.

II. Policy

Effectively immediately, any alien from a SOC who is apprehended or detained by the
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Detention and Removal
Operations (ORO) must be cleared by the Custody Review Unit (CRU) prior to release.
The detaining office will send a message to the CRU of the Headquarters, Fugitive
Operations Branch (HQFOB) via cc: Mail to: Prior to transfer to
another agency, release to the streets or removal from the United States, the alien must
Memorandum for All Field Office Directors Page2
Subject: Addition of 19.33 to the DDFM

be cleared for such transfer or release by the CRU. The CRU shall determine if the
alien is a National Security or Third Agency Interest (TAI) person.

Ill. Procedure

CRU Initial and Subsequent Notification

The subject line of all cc: Mail messages shall read: "Third Agency Check AXX XXX
XXX". The initial report shall include the alien's name, alien registration number (A-file
number), date of birth (DOB), place of birth (POB), criminal convictions or pending
criminal charges, removal charge(s), and a brief description of the circumstances of the
alien's apprehension. It will take approximately three weeks for all third agency checks
to be completed. Subsequent messages from the detaining office shall contain the same
subject line but will include a sequence number after the alien registration number (AXX
XXX XXX-XX).

Custody Issues

The fact that the alien is a SOC subject and pending clearance by the CRU must be
immediately communicated to the local Office of Legal Advisor (OLA). CRU shall notify
Headquarters, OLA so they can be prepared to provide advice or direction to the local
OLA. The alien's SDC status must be taken into consideration should the alien file a
motion for a custody redetermination hearing before the Executive Office for Immigration
Review. The fact that the alien is a SDC subject does not automatically mean that OLA
will appeal an adverse custody redetermination.

Once CRU clearance is obtained, local OLA must be notified. They will then notify the
Immigration Judge (IJ). However, if the IJ makes an adverse custody determination that
is not appealed by OLA, the alien.!!!.!!§! be released. The CRU shall be advised of that
fact immediately by telephone (202MiiM@M1 and followed up by a cc: Mail message
with a summary of the IJ's decision. The Deportable Alien Control System (DACS) will
also be updated immediately particularly the \b)(7)e ICe screens.

If the alien is not cleared and designated a TAl subject, local OLA shall be notified
immediately. Again OLA will communicate that information to the IJ as soon as
possible.

Administrative Final Orders

SDC subjects who have a final administrative removal order are subject to Post Order
Custody Review (POCR) Procedures. If the SDC subject has not been designated a
TAI case then, not later than 30-days prior to the SDC reaching the 90-day post-order
mark, the detaining office shall forward all biographic information listed above to the CRU
via cc: Mail. If a SDC subject has already been designated as a TAI subject, the
detaining office shall (via cc: Mail) notify the CRU that the subject is approaching the
Memorandum for All Field Office Directors Page3
Subject: Addition of 19.33 to the DDFM

90-day post-order mark. In no case shall a Field Office Director release a SDC/TAl final
order subject without clearance from the CRU.

Preparation for the Removal of TAl Cases

It currently takes approximately three weeks for CRU to issue a clearance for execution of
removal orders. Detaining offices are advised that CRU clearance messages should be
sent a minimum of four weeks in advance of a projected removal date. This will help
allow for possible delays in obtaining travel documents or making adjustments to the
travel itinerary. Individual clearance must be obtained for each SDC/TAI subject who is
part of Special Removal/Charter Flight Missions. A copy of the release authorization
shall be attached to the Warrant of Removal/Deportation (1-205) as part of the Travel
Document Packet.

Questions regarding this chapter shall be directed to the Chief, Fugitive Operations
Branch or via cc: Mail to the CRU address.

Cc: Director, Office of Investigations

Director, Office of Intelligence