Introduction and Users Guide Module 1
Introduction and Users Guide Module 1
Preface
The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and the U.S. Department of
Transportation (USDOT), Maritime Administration (MARAD) signed a cooperative agreement
to develop an easy-to-read, easy-to-understand, and easy-to-execute Port Planning and
Investment Toolkit. The goal of the project is to provide U.S. ports with a common framework
and examples of best practices when planning, evaluating and funding/financing freight
transportation, facility and other port-related improvement projects.
The analytical tools and guidance contained in this comprehensive resource are designed to
aid ports in developing “investment-grade” project plans and obtain capital for their
projects in a variety of ways, including: (1) improve the chances of getting port
infrastructure projects into Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and state
transportation programs to qualify for formula funding; (2) better position port projects for
federal aid; and (3) assist ports in obtaining private sector investment.
Since each port investment project is unique with its own set of strengths and obstacles, the
material in this Toolkit is not intended to address specific requirements of any single
project, user or port; it is a resource for a diverse group of users to become familiar with port
planning, feasibility and financing and to highlight opportunities for engagement and
coordination throughout the project definition process. This document is not a replacement
of existing policies or consultation handbooks and does not constitute a standard,
specification or regulation. The exhibits, processes, methods and techniques described
herein may or may not comply with specific national, state, regional and local regulatory
requirements.
All material included in the Toolkit is copyrighted, 2017 by AAPA. The materials may be
used for informational, educational or other non-commercial purposes. Any other use of the
materials in this document, including reproduction for purposes other than described
above, distribution, republication and display in any form or by any means, printed or
electronic, is prohibited without the prior written permission of the AAPA.
This Toolkit will be updated periodically as new regulations and policies are developed
affecting port planning, feasibility and investment requirements related to the applicable
laws discussed in the document. Additional information, updates, and resources of the
Toolkit are available on the AAPA website at http://www.aapa-
ports.org/empowering/content.aspx?ItemNumber=21263 and the MARAD website at -
https://www.marad.dot.gov/ports/strongports/port-planning-and-investment-toolkit/
For all other queries regarding the Port Planning and Investment Toolkit, please contact
Jean Godwin, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, AAPA at 703-684-5700.
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
Introduction
The American Association of Port Authorities This requires costly investments in port
(AAPA) and the U.S. Department of infrastructure and equipment. Because these
Transportation (USDOT) through the Maritime rapidly growing capital needs cannot be fully met
Administration (MARAD) organized a team of port from traditional revenue sources, port owners
industry experts throughout the U.S. to develop have sought innovative methods to finance
this Port Planning and Investment Toolkit. The infrastructure investment by engaging with a
Toolkit provides port owners with information and new, larger cast of public and private partners.
practices to assist when planning and evaluating These partners must have access to in-depth
projects that require financing and/or funding from planning, environmental assessment, outreach,
public, private or combined sources. It also outlines feasibility and financial analysis outcomes before
the steps and processes used by planning determining whether to provide funds for a port
professionals and financiers, which may be new to project under consideration.
some port professional staff and commissioners.
Port owners have emphasized the need for a
resource to guide them as they prepare plans,
Purpose & Need
evaluate the feasibility and estimate the financial
U.S. ports move billions of tons of goods today performance of their projects to attract public and
and need significantly more capacity to handle private investment. Such a resource would assist
the peak cargo volumes projected in the future. them in reaching their goal of obtaining funding
and financing for the implementation of critical
Project Port & Private Capital Expenditures development, expansion, repair and upgrade
on Port Infrastructure projects.
I-1
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
User’s Guide
This User’s Guide provides guidance and direction • Throughput Capacity provides detail related to
to Toolkit users when accessing the various the variables and modeling approach that
resources in the Toolkit. The Toolkit is comprised should be considered in assessing a port’s
of three modules that are aligned with the three practical capacity.
primary stages involved in project definition:
• Forecasting Trade Demand summarizes the
Planning, Feasibility and Financing. The Toolkit
challenges of developing a port-specific trade
also contains multiple Appendices, a Resource
forecast and provides an example of the
Catalog, and a Port Concession Evaluation Model.
economic variables that should be considered.
The Planning Module provides guidance to the The Resource Catalog is a searchable spreadsheet
Toolkit user when beginning to identify factors that contains references and links to applicable
that must be addressed when planning a potential studies and reports, academic papers, trade
port project. This module provides clearly defined publications and other pertinent material available on
steps of the planning efforts needed to support a the subject of port planning and feasibility.
financeable project.
The Port Concession Evaluation Model is a sample
The Feasibility Module addresses the process of financial model provided for illustrative purposes that
refining a project plan by considering all aspects can be used for considering high level concession
of cost, risk, and reward. This module includes evaluation elements. The objective of this sample
approaches for measuring and evaluating the model is to illustrate key elements of a financial
benefits and costs of project alternatives created feasibility and financing strategy analysis for a port
during the planning stage. terminal concession.
The Financing Module describes different This User’s Guide has been organized to help the
approaches for evaluating project financing Toolkit user quickly understand and gain access to
strategies and identifying ways to obtain grant the appropriate content of interest:
funding and public/private financing. It includes
I. Context: Key terms are defined to provide a
examples of financing strategy solutions designed
context for understanding the Toolkit’s
to address a variety of needs.
intended audience and purpose.
Appendices are included to provide usable
II. Outline: A general description of the structure
resources related to each module:
and content is provided to assist the user with
• The Glossary of Terms defines the understanding the top level organization of the
terminology that is used throughout the Toolkit modules.
Toolkit, providing a common basis of
III. Checklist: Rapid guidance to accessing specific
communication.
content in each Toolkit module is provided by
• Project Profiles includes descriptions of how using the checklist at the end of the user’s
different real-world projects were guide. A series of statements related to port
approached, providing Toolkit users with planning, feasibility and financing are provided
examples that demonstrate best practices in along with the corresponding hyperlink and
port planning, feasibility analysis and page number where each topic is addressed.
financing.
I-2
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
I. Context
This Toolkit has been created to guide the Port developments may have multiple components
definition of a project for which a port owner is that are linked together by a common objective;
seeking financing and/or funding. The term project however, port owners seeking financing and/or
financing as used in this Toolkit refers to the funding should separate each independent
means by which debt and/or equity is acquired to component into individual projects to minimize the
pay for a project or portion thereof, requiring the compounding of financial and permitting risks. Each
project's cash flow or assets for repayment. project should have independent utility, i.e., it is
Project funding, in this Toolkit, refers to the functional without the development or improvement
means by which internal reserves, direct user of other separate assets. While the project may
charges/fees, or government investment are raised include sub-projects related to the phasing of project
or obtained and used to pay for a project or portion construction, these phases of the project would
thereof. typically not have independent utility.
Because the range of potential users of this Toolkit A project with independent utility will have an
is diverse, the term port owner throughout this independent development timeline such that its
Toolkit encompasses port authorities, terminal unique benefits, costs and impacts can be clearly
operators, private companies, and project ascertained. Although additional benefits or costs
sponsors that own and/or operate a port. A port is of a project may result in the future due to
considered to be a single- or multiple-facility entity synergies with other planned improvements at a
that facilitates the transfer of cargo and/or port, the project should stand on its own merits in
passengers between logistically-linked transport the event that the other projects never come to
modes (e.g., truck to barge to ocean-going vessel). fruition. The cumulative impacts of other projects
A port may provide services at inland multimodal that have occurred or may occur in a project area
facilities as well as along navigable waterways. should still be considered, particularly for
environmental review.
I-3
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
In a given year, a port owner may undertake any For example, a strategy to increase refrigerated
one or several planning efforts (Exhibit I-1 ) that cargo business as an outcome of a port’s Strategic
lead to potential port projects. Comprehensive Plan may cause higher local truck traffic and create
planning outcomes typically include the a need for additional warehouse space and reefer
identification of future port developments and plugs, impacting the Regional Goods Movement
potential projects. Project-specific planning Plan and the port’s Operations & Maintenance
efforts involve the definition of a project and Plan and Capital Improvement Plan, among
culminate in a project plan in support of pursuing others. Similarly a Transportation Access Plan that
project financing and/or funding. identifies a need for an overpass at the Port
impacts the port’s Land Use Plan, Stormwater
Although port planning efforts occur at different
Plan, and Inter-Terminal Plan.
stages and at varying degrees of specificity
ranging from strategic to tactical, they are often Comprehensive Planning: Identification of
interconnected such that the decision cycles Potential Projects
resulting from one planning effort can influence Comprehensive planning efforts have been
the outcomes of other efforts. In addition, any of organized into three groups with associated
the comprehensive planning efforts can provide ranges of focus:
input into the development of project plans, and
project plans in turn can influence the
• Direction (long to short term);
identification of other potential projects. • Operation (external to internal focus); and
• Resource (regional to port focus) planning.
Exhibit I-1 Examples of Port Planning Efforts
I-4
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
I-5
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
I-6
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
II. Outline
The project definition process and formulation of When conducting project feasibility activities,
a project plan are simultaneous processes that the reasonable project alternatives are subjected
consist of a series of stages to establish that a to systematic and comprehensive evaluation and
“potential project” is feasible and to advance it to a the highest performing project alternative is
“financeable project”. The Toolkit is structured to selected and refined. From the resulting
follow this natural progression of a project recommended project, project costs and a
through the Planning, Feasibility and Financing strategy for financing those costs can be
Modules, as shown in Exhibit I-2. identified. The financeable project can then be
submitted for approval and financing to the
Project definition takes place at the culmination
appropriate entities. Once the necessary
of the “Identification” process whereby a port
approvals and financing are in place, the project
owner has already established the overall port
plan can be implemented. Plans are rarely
vision and needs, quantified port gaps, and
implemented to perfection so regular
identified potential projects that fill those gaps.
monitoring and periodic evaluation should be
During project-specific planning efforts, details of carried out to identify shortcomings and to make
a potential project are quantified and project enhancements.
alternatives are formed. While certain project
Within and between each module or stage,
alternatives will be briefly considered and
project definition activities may loop back to
eliminated, the reasonable project alternatives will
previous efforts to continually improve the
address the project goals and objectives, while
project planning, feasibility and financing
giving consideration to social, economic,
strategy. The activities occurring at each stage
environmental and other impacts. Port owners
can also be iterative and overlapping and might
should engage with external stakeholders, such as
require reconsideration of previous conclusions if
port users, nearby communities and regulatory
conditions change. For example, during the
agencies, to determine possible impacts of the
evaluation of a project’s feasibility, the cost of
project alternatives.
one component of the project may not return a
high enough benefit and the project alternatives
may need to be revisited and amended.
Likewise, during the analysis of financing and
funding strategies, the sequencing and timing of
improvements may prohibit the highest financial
performance. At that point the project
alternatives should be revised, the feasibility
reevaluated and ultimately the financing
strategy reexamined.
I-7
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
I-8
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
I-9
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
INTRODUCTION/USER’S GUIDE
Check Page
Project Definition Process Topic
Box #
Financing
Strategize - Approach for project investment 3-1
Strategize - Performing project due diligence through:
• Financial Feasibility Screening 3-3
• Financial Risk Analysis 3-4
• Debt Considerations 3-5
Strategize - Identifying the port owner’s credit/debt profile of:
• Project Credit Elements 3-6
• Port Credit Attributes 3-7
• Rating Agency Considerations 3-9
• Debt Profile 3-11
Structure - Business model influences on finance 3-13
Structure - Considering finance alternatives through:
• Private Activity Bonds 3-15
• Commercial Bank Financing 3-15
• Project Finance Bonds 3-16
• Revenue Bonds 3-19
Structure - Financial modeling approach and process 3-19
Structure - Managing and implementing debt including:
• Debt Capacity and Issuance for Projects 3-24
• Debt Refunding for Saving 3-26
• Debt Transactions 3-27
• Post-Issuance Compliance 3-29
Structure - Public-Private Partnership (P3)/Concession elements:
• Background and Rationale 3-30
• Analysis and Valuation 3-33
• Development of Transactions 3-34
• Business/Financial Terms 3-36
• Solicitation 3-38
Structure - Grant Funding 3-41
Structure - Government Loans 3-46
Appendices
A: Glossary of Terms A-1
B: Project Profiles B-1
C: Estimating Throughput Capacity Example C-1
D: Forecasting Trade Demand Example D-1
Resource Catalog URL
Port Concession Evaluation Model URL
I-10
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Glossary of Terms
Additional Bonds Test - The financial test, Asset - Any item of economic value, either
sometimes referred to as a “parity test,” that must physical in nature (such as land) or a right to
be satisfied under the bond contract securing ownership, expressed in cost or some other value,
outstanding revenue bonds or other types of which an individual or entity owns. 2
bonds as a condition to issuing additional bonds.
Asset-Backed Debt - Debt having hard asset
Typically, the test would require that historical
security such as a crane lease or property
revenues (plus, in some cases, future estimated
mortgage, in addition to the security of pledged
revenues) exceed projected debt service
revenues.
requirements for both the outstanding issue and
the proposed issue by a certain ratio.1 Availability Payment - A means of compensating
a private concessionaire for its responsibility to
Advance Refunding - For purposes of certain tax
design, construct, operate, and/or maintain an
and securities laws and regulations, a refunding in
infrastructure facility for a set period of time.
which the refunded issue remains outstanding for
These payments are made by a public project
a period of more than 90 days after the issuance of
sponsor (a port authority, for example) based on
the refunding issue.1
particular project milestones or facility
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) - Taxation based performance standards.2
on an alternative method of calculating federal
Best and Final Offers (BAFO) - In government
income tax under the Internal Revenue Code.
contracting, a vendor’s response to a contracting
Interest on certain private activity bonds is subject
officer’s request that vendors submit their last and
to the AMT.1
most attractive bids to secure a contract for a
Amortization - The process of paying the principal particular project. Best and final offers are
amount of an issue of securities by periodic submitted during the final round of negotiations.3
payments either directly to bondholders or to a
Bond Indenture - A contract between the issuer of
sinking fund for the benefit of bondholders.1
municipal securities and a trustee for the benefit of
Arbitrage Rebate - A payment made by an issuer the bondholders. The trustee administers the
to the federal government in connection with an funds or property specified in the indenture in a
issue of tax-exempt or other federally tax- fiduciary capacity on behalf of the bondholders.
advantaged bonds. The payment represents the The indenture, which is generally part of the bond
amount, if any, of arbitrage earnings on bond contract, establishes the rights, duties,
proceeds and certain other related funds, except responsibilities and remedies of the issuer and
for earnings that are not required to be rebated trustee and determines the exact nature of the
under limited exemptions provided under the security for the bonds. The trustee is generally
Internal Revenue Code. An issuer generally is empowered to enforce the terms of the indenture
required to calculate, once every five years during on behalf of the bondholders.1
the life of its bonds, whether or not an arbitrage
Call Date - The date on which bonds may be called
rebate payment must be made.1
for redemption as specified by the bond contract. 1
A-1
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - A schedule, Covenants - Contractual obligations set forth in a
typically covering a period of less than ten years, bond contract. Covenants commonly made in
which outlines expenditures for capital projects on connection with a bond issue may include
an annual basis and corresponding funding covenants to charge fees sufficient to provide
sources. required pledged revenues (called a “rate
covenant”); to maintain casualty insurance on the
Capital Structure - The mix of an issuer’s or a
project; to complete, maintain and operate the
project’s short and long-term debt and equity,
project; not to sell or
including the terms of such financing and
encumber the project;
repayment requirements.
not to issue parity
Capitalized Interest - A portion of the proceeds of bonds or other
an issue that is set aside to pay interest on the indebtedness unless
securities for a specified period of time. Interest is certain tests are met
commonly capitalized for the construction period (“additional bonds” or
of a revenue-producing project, and sometimes for “additional
a period thereafter, so that debt service expense indebtedness”
does not begin until the project is expected to be covenant); and not to
operational and producing revenues.1 take actions that would
Concession - An alternative method for a public cause tax-exempt
sector entity to deliver a public- purpose project interest on the bonds to
through long-term contracting with a private become taxable or
sector entity. A concession agreement typically otherwise become
covers the objectives of the asset concession, arbitrage bonds (“tax
compensation, and duration of concession. A port covenants”).1
A-2
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
A-3
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Design-Build (DB) - A project delivery method collection account or revenue fund established
that combines two, usually separate services into a under the bond contract for disbursement into the
single contract. With design-build procurements, other accounts established under the bond
owners execute a single, fixed- fee contract for contract. Such other accounts generally provide
both architectural/engineering services and for payment of the costs of debt service, debt
construction. The design-build entity may be a service reserve deposits, operation and
single firm, a consortium, joint venture or other maintenance costs, renewal and replacement and
organization assembled for a particular project.4 other required amounts.1
Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain Forward Refunding - An agreement, usually
(DBFOM) - A method of project delivery in which between an issuer and the underwriter, whereby
the responsibilities for designing, building, the issuer agrees to issue bonds on a specified
financing and operating are bundled together and future date and an underwriter agrees to purchase
transferred to private sector partners.4 such bonds on such date. The proceeds of such
bonds, when issued, will be used to refund the
Design-Build-Operate-Maintain (DBOM) - An
issuer’s outstanding bonds. Typically, a forward
integrated partnership that combines the design
refunding is used where the bonds to be refunded
and construction responsibilities of design-build
are not permitted to be advance refunded on a tax-
procurements with operations and maintenance.
exempt basis under the Internal Revenue Code. In
These project components are procured from the
such a case, the issuer agrees to issue, and the
private sector in a single contract with financing
underwriter agrees to purchase, the new issue of
secured by the public sector.4
bonds on a future date that would effect a current
Enabling Act – Legislation by which port refunding.1
authorities and other governmental agencies are
Independent Utility - A project is considered to
created and granted powers to carry out certain
have independent utility if it would be constructed
actions. While enabling acts for port authorities
absent the construction of other projects in the
vary widely; key aspects generally include
project area. Portions of a multi-phase project that
establishment of the port entity; governance and
depend upon other phases of the project do not
procedures; powers such as ability to enter into
have independent utility. Phases of a project that
contracts, construct projects, transact business,
would be constructed even if the other phases
and enter into financing agreements; and
were not built can be considered as separate single
reporting requirements.
and complete projects with independent utility. (72
Equity - A funding contribution to a project having FR 47, p. 11196).
an order of repayment occurring after debt holders
Intelligent
in a flow of funds per the bond indenture securing
Transportation
such funding contribution.
Systems (ITS) - An
Escrow - A fund established to hold funds pledged operational system
and to be used solely for a designated purpose, of various
typically to pay debt service on an outstanding technologies that,
issue in an advance refunding.1 when combined and
Flow of Funds - The order and priority of handling, managed, improve
depositing and disbursing pledged revenues, as set the operating
forth in the bond contract. Generally, pledged capabilities of the
revenues are deposited, as received, into a general overall system.
A-4
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Interest Rate Swap - A specific derivative contract letter of credit committing to pay principal of and
entered into by an issuer or obligor with a swap interest on the securities in the event that the
provider to exchange periodic interest payments. issuer is unable to do so.1
Typically, one party agrees to make payments to the
Liquidated Damages - Present in certain legal
other based upon a fixed rate of interest in exchange
contracts, this provision allows for the payment of
for payments based upon a variable rate. The swap
a specified sum should one of the parties be in
contract may provide that the issuer will pay to the
breach of contract.3
swap counter-party a fixed rate of interest in
exchange for the counter-party making variable Liquidity - In the context project finance, the
payments equal to the amount payable on the build-up of cash reserve balances which are viewed
variable rate debt.1 favorably given the ability to use such reserves to
cover debt service and other obligations under a
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) - The discount rate
bond indenture should expected project cash flows
often used in capital budgeting that makes the net
not materialize for any given period.
present value of all cash flows from a particular
project equal to zero. Generally speaking, the higher a Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) - A
project’s internal rate of return, the more desirable it document resulting from regional or statewide
is to undertake the project.3 collaboration and consensus on a region or state's
transportation system, and serving as the defining
Investment-Grade - A security that, in the opinion of
vision for the region's or state's transportation
the rating agency, has a relatively low risk of default.1
systems and services. In metropolitan areas, the
Alternatively, the level of comprehensiveness and
plan indicates all of the transportation
market readiness for investment-grade security
improvements scheduled for funding over the next
issuance in referring to a demand & revenue report or
20 years. The plan must conform to regional air
engineering report supporting such security issuance.
quality implementation plans and be financially
Letter of Credit - An irrevocable commitment, usually constrained.2, 4
made by a commercial bank, to honor demands for
Major Project Financial Plan - Under U.S.
payment of a debt upon
Department of Transportation (USDOT) guidance,
compliance with conditions
transportation projects are required to submit a
and/or the occurrence of
Major Project Financial Plan if any of the following
certain events specified
apply: 1) recipient of Federal financial assistance
under the terms of the letter
for a Title 23 project with a minimum cost of $500
of credit and any associated
million, 2) identified by the USDOT Secretary as a
reimbursement agreement. A
major project and 3) applying for TIFIA assistance.
letter of credit is frequently
used to provide credit and Master/Land-Use Plan - Port documents that
liquidity support for variable guides a port’s planning, development and
rate demand obligations and management of land, infrastructure and facilities,
other types of securities. with the goal of accommodating future growth
Bank letters of credit are and supporting the regional economy. These plans
sometimes used as additional often include information on port owners’ goals
sources of security for issues and policies; survey of existing conditions/facilities;
of municipal notes, stakeholder outreach activities; land use data;
commercial paper or bonds, environmental considerations; analysis of future
with the bank issuing the
A-5
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
A-6
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
A-7
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Publicly Issued - The sale of bonds or other investment or to compare the efficiency of a
financial instruments by an organization to the number of different investments. ROI measures
public in order to raise funds for infrastructure the amount of return on an investment relative to
expansion and investment (contrast with privately the investment’s cost. To calculate ROI, the
placed financial instruments including directly benefit (or return) of an investment is divided by
placed loans with a financial institution/lender). the cost of the investment, and the result is
expressed as a percentage or a ratio.3
Put Bond - A bond that allows the holder to force
the issuer to repurchase the security at specified Request for Letters of Intent (RLOI) - Document
dates before maturity. The repurchase price is set used to solicit Letters of Intent, an interim
at the time of issue, and is usually par value.3 agreement that summarizes the main points of a
proposed deal, or confirms that a certain course of
Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement
action is going to be taken. Normally, it does not
Financing (RRIF) - Under this program the Federal
constitute a definitive contract but signifies a
Railroad Administration Administrator is
genuine interest in reaching the final agreement
authorized to provide direct loans and loan
subject to due diligence, additional information, or
guarantees up to $35.0 billion to finance
fulfillment of certain conditions. The language
development of railroad infrastructure. Up to $7.0
used in writing a letter of intent is of vital
billion is reserved for projects benefiting freight
importance, and determines whether it is only an
railroads other than Class I carriers. The funding
expression of intent or an enforceable
may be used to (a) acquire, improve, or rehabilitate
undertaking.5
intermodal or rail equipment or facilities, including
track, components of track, bridges, yards, Request for Proposals (RFP) - Document used in
buildings and shops; (b) refinance outstanding sealed-bid procurement procedures through which
debt incurred for the purposes listed above; and (c) a purchaser advises the potential suppliers of (1)
develop or establish new intermodal or railroad statement and scope of work, (2) specifications, (3)
facilities. Direct loans can fund up to 100% of a schedules or timelines, (4) contract type, (5) data
railroad project with repayment periods of up to 35 requirements, (6) terms and conditions, (7)
years and interest rates equal to the cost of description of goods and/or services to be
borrowing to the government. Eligible borrowers procured, (8) general criteria used in evaluation
include railroads, state and local governments, procedure, (9) special contractual requirements,
government-sponsored authorities and (10) technical goals, (11) instructions for
corporations, joint ventures that include at least preparation of technical, management, and/or cost
one railroad, and limited option freight shippers proposals or in the case of P3s, a full P3 contract.
who intend to construct a new rail connection.6 RFPs are publicly
advertised and suppliers
Rate Covenant - A covenant to charge fees
respond with a detailed
sufficient to provide required pledged revenues.1
proposal, not with only a
Renewal & Replacement (R&R) - Funds to cover price quotation. They
anticipated expenses for major repairs of the provide for negotiations
issuer’s facilities or a project whose revenues are after sealed proposals are
pledged to the bonds or for R&R of related opened, and the award of
equipment.1 contract may not
Return on Investment (ROI) – A performance necessarily go to the
measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an lowest bidder.5
A-8
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Senior Lien Debt - Bonds having the priority claim Transport Modes - For each mode, there are
against pledged revenues superior to the claim several means of transport. They are: a. inland
against such pledged revenues or security of other surface transportation (rail, road, and inland
obligations.1 waterway); b. sea transport (coastal and ocean); c.
air transportation; and d. pipelines.
Special Purpose Facility Bonds - Bonds issued by a
governmental entity to finance facilities supporting Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - A
private sector activity, and secured by payments of short-term transportation planning document,
special purpose rent received by the port or the approved at the local level, covering at least a
trustee pursuant to an agreement with lessee/ four-year period for projects within the
concessionaire. Such bonds are issued by the boundaries of a Metropolitan Planning
governmental entity as the conduit issuer to achieve Organization (MPO). The TIP must be developed
tax-exempt (or AMT) status on the bonds. in cooperation with state and public transit
providers and must be financially constrained. The
State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) - A state or multi-
TIP includes a list of capital and non-capital
state revolving fund that provides loans, credit
surface transportation projects, bicycle and
enhancement, and other forms of financial
pedestrian facilities and other transportation
assistance to transportation infrastructure projects.2
enhancements. The TIP should include all
State Transportation Improvement Program regionally significant projects receiving FHWA or
(STIP) - A short-term transportation planning FTA funds, or for which FHWA or FTA approval is
document covering at least a three-year period and required, in addition to non-federally funded
updated at least every two years. The STIP includes a projects that are consistent with the MPO’s LRTP.
priority list of projects to be carried out in each of the
A-9
Port Planning & Investment Toolkit
APPENDICES
Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Value for Money (VfM) - A technique used to
Innovation Act (TIFIA) - The Transportation evaluate and quantify project risks. VfM “prices”
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 1998 risk by producing a discounted net present value
(TIFIA) authorized the USDOT to provide three amount that represents the aggregate impact of
forms of credit assistance - secured (direct) loans, various sensitivities applied to the variable inputs
loan guarantees and standby lines of credit - to of a project. An assessment of VfM for P3
surface transportation projects of national or procurements is a comparative concept, and as
regional significance. A specific goal of TIFIA is to such most delivery agencies seek to use a “public
leverage private co-investment. Because the sector comparator” approach to evaluating VfM.
program offers credit assistance, rather than grant
Yield - The annual rate of return on an investment,
funding, potential projects must be capable of
based on the purchase price of the investment, its
generating revenue streams via user charges or
coupon rate and the length of time the investment
have access to other dedicated funding sources. In
is held. The yield of a municipal security moves
general, a project’s eligible costs must be
inversely to the price.1
reasonably anticipated to total at least $50 million.
Credit assistance is available to: projects eligible Yield Restriction - A general requirement under
for assistance under title 23 or chapter 53 of title the Internal Revenue Code that proceeds of tax-
49; international bridges and tunnels; intercity exempt bonds not be used to make investments at
passenger bus or rail facilities and vehicles, a higher yield than the yield on the bonds. The
including those owned by Amtrak; public freight Internal Revenue Code provides certain
rail projects; private freight rail projects that exceptions, such as for investment of bond
provide public benefit for highway users by way of proceeds for reasonable temporary periods
direct highway-rail freight interchange (a pending expenditure and investments held in
refinement of the SAFETEA-LU eligibility “reasonably required” debt service reserve funds.1
criterion); intermodal freight transfer facilities; Note: Sources for the glossary include (1)
projects providing access to, or improving the www.msrb.org, (2) www.transportation-
service of, the freight rail projects and transfer finance.org, (3) www.investopedia.com, (4)
facilities described above; and surface www.fhwa.dot.gov, (5)
transportation infrastructure modifications www.businessdictionary.com, and (6)
necessary to facilitate direct intermodal www.fra.dot.gov.
interchange, transfer and access into and out of
a port. The TIFIA credit assistance is limited to
49 percent of eligible project costs.4
Transportation Investment Generating
Economic Recovery (TIGER) - USDOT TIGER
discretionary grants are awarded on a
competitive basis for capital investments in
surface transportation projects that will have a
significant impact on the nation, a metropolitan
area or a region.
A-10
U.S. Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration
West Building
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590