Gazettes 1690984228162
Gazettes 1690984228162
Gazettes 1690984228162
HSE-49/2016
PART I EXTRAORDINARY
No.857 AMARAVATI, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 2023 G.593
NOTIFICATIONS BY GOVERNMENT
--x--
Public Services - Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 –
Implementation of Horizontal Reservation to Women, Persons with Benchmark
Disabilities, Ex-Servicemen and Meritorious Sportspersons in the matter of direct
recruitment and promotions and Amendments to Rule- 22 – Orders/Notification –
Issued.
1
5. G.O.Ms.No.436, G.A. (Ser.D) Deptt., dated 15-10-1996.
6. G.O.Ms.No.175, Home (Genl.C) Deptt., dated 10-02-2005.
7. G.O.Ms.No.310, G.A. (Ser.D) Dept., dated 19.7.2005.
8. G.O.Ms.No.23, Dept. for WCDA&SC (DW), dated 26.05.2011.
9. G.O.Ms.No.42, Dept. for WCDA&SC (DW), dated 19.10.2011.
10. G.O.Ms.No.74, Youth, Advancement, Tourism and Culture (Sports)
Department, dated 9.8.2012.
11. G.O.Ms.No.99, G.A. (Ser.D) Dept., dated 04.03.2013.
12. G.O.Ms.No.40, Dept. for WCDA&SC (Prog.II), dated 25.07.2016.
13. G.O.Ms.No.17, Youth, Advancement, Tourism and Culture
(Sports&YS) Department, dated 9.8.2017.
14. G.O.Ms.No.188, G.A. (Ser.D) Dept. dated 18.12.2017.
15. G.O.Ms.No.13, G.A. (Ser.D) Dept., dated 23.01.2018.
16. G.O.Ms.No.63, G.A. (Ser.D) Dept., dated 17.04.2018.
17. G.O.Ms.No.60, B.C. Welfare (F) Dept, dated 27.7.2019.
18. G.O.Ms.No.2, Dept. for WCDA&SC, dated 19.02.2020.
19. Judgement dated 05.03.2021 of the Hon’ble Court of Andhra Pradesh
in W.P. 23770 of 2017 and batch cases.
20. G.O.Ms.No.65, G.A.(Ser.D) Dept., dated 14.7.2021.
21. G.O.Ms.No.66, G.A.(Ser.D) Dept., dated 14.7.2021.
22. G.O.Ms.No.73, G.A.(Ser.D) Dept., dated 4.8.2021.
23. G.O.Ms.No.121, G.A.(Ser.D) Dept. dated 12.10.2022.
24. G.O.Ms.No.140, G.A.(Ser.D) Dept., dated 16.11.2022.
25. G.O.Ms.No.36, G.A.(Ser.D) Dept., Dated 29.03.2023.
26. From the Prl. Secretary to Govt., Social Welfare Department and
Chairperson of the Committee to study Horizontal Reservations
Lr.No.1841934/PESHI/2023, dated 10.04.2023.
*****
ORDER:
(I) Background
In the judgment first read above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, New
Delhi, in Anil Kumar Gupta, Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on Equivalent
citations: 1995 SCC (5) 173, JT 1995 (5) 505 has disposed of the case with the
following directions:-
2
over-all horizontal reservation - no further question arises. But if it is not so satisfied,
the requisite number of special reservation candidates shall have to be taken and
adjusted/accommodated against their respective social reservation categories by
deleting the corresponding number of candidates there from. (If, however, it is a case
of compartmentalised horizontal reservation, then the process of verification and
adjustment/accommodation as stated above should be applied separately to each of the
vertical reservations. In such a case, the reservation of fifteen percent in favour of
special categories, overall, may be satisfied or may not be satisfied.) Because the
revised notification provided for a different method of filling the seats, it has
contributed partly to the unfortunate situation where the entire special reservation
quota has been allocated and adjusted almost exclusively against the O.C. quota.
“In this connection, we must reiterate what this Court has said in Indra
Sawhney. While holding that what may be called "horizontal reservation" can be
provided under clause (1) of Article 16, the majority judgment administered the
following caution in para 744: "(B)ut at the same time, one thing is clear. It is in very
exceptional situation - and not for all and sundry reasons - that any further
reservations of whatever kind, should be provided under clause (1). In such cases, the
State has to satisfy, if called upon, that making such a provision was necessary (in
public interest) to redress the specific situation. The very presence of clause (4) should
act as a damper upon the propensity to create further classes deserving special
treatment. The reason for saying so is very simply. If reservations are made both
under clause (4) as well as under (1), the vacancies available for free competition as
well as reserved categories would be correspondingly whittled down and that is not a
reasonable thing to do". Though the said observations were made with reference to
clauses (1) and (4) of Article 16, the same apply with equal force to clauses (1) and (4)
of Article 15 as well. In this case, the reservation of fifteen percent of seats for special
categories was on very high side. As pointed out above, two categories out of them
representing six percent out of fifteen percent are really reservations under Article
15(4), wrongly treated as reservations under Article 15(1). Even otherwise, the
special reservation would be nine percent. The respondents would be well advised to
keep in mind the admonition administered by this Court and ensure that the special
reservations (horizontal reservations) are kept at the minimum.
“Having pointed out the errors in the rule of reservation and its
implementation, the question arises what should be done now? Should we interfere
with the admissions already finalised? We think it inadvisable to do so. It may be
remembered that the admissions now finalised (in June- July, 1995) are really the
admissions which ought to have been finalised one year back. The delay has occurred
on account of the first faulty notification (issued on May 17, 1994). When a writ
petition was filed in this court - probably some writ petitions in the High Court also -
the Government realised its mistake and issued the revised notification on December
17, 1994. It dropped the reservation in favour of women in stages. The University had
then to issue a corrigendum asking the special category candidates to indicate their
social status. This was a delayed exercise which ought to have been undertaken at the
beginning itself. Even the manner in which the seats have been filled up, as indicated
above, is faulty. What we have laid down herein is more for the purpose of future
guidance for the respondents. At the same time, we have to rectify the injustice done
to the open competition candidates in the admissions in question, to the extend
3
feasible. Accordingly, we direct that in the matter of admissions made pursuant to
C.P.M.T.1994, while the admissions already finalised shall not be disturbed, the Uttar
Pradesh Government shall create thirty four additional seats in the M.B.B.S. course
and admit thirty four students from the O.C. category against those seats. If any seats
are vacant as on today, they shall also be filled from the O.C. category alone. (It is
made clear that O.C. category means the merit list and no distinction shall be made
among the candidates in the O.C. list on the basis of their social status because it is
well settled that even a S.T./S.C./O.B.C. candidate is entitled to obtain a seat in the
O.C. category on the basis of his merit.) The counsel for the petitioners complain that
fifty four students belonging to O.C. category have been deprived on account of
respondents' faulty actions and that it should be directed to be made up. We cannot
agree. The factual basis of this submission is debatable in view of the ambiguity
mentioned hereinbefore. We have directed creation of thirty four seats (making a total
of 780 seats this year) having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case.
This creation of additional seats is restricted to current admissions only and shall not
be a permanent feature. The Uttar Pradesh Government/concerned authorities shall
allocate the said thirty four additional seats appropriately among the government
medical colleges and make admissions thereto as early as possible.
“We hope and trust that the respondents will ensure that a similar situation
does not arise for the ensuing admissions.
“The writ petitions are disposed of with the above terms. No costs”.
2. In the judgment second read above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajesh
Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission and others has disposed of
the case as follows:-
“ But the said principle applicable to vertical (social) reservations, will not apply
to horizontal (special) reservations. Where a special reservation for women is provided
within the social reservation for SCs, the proper procedure is first to fill up the quota
for SCs in order of merit and then find out the number of candidates among them who
belong to the special reservation group of ‘Scheduled Caste Women”. If the number of
women in such list is equal to or more than number of special reservation quota, then
4
there is no need for further selection towards the special reservation quota. Only if
there is any shortfall, the requisite number of Scheduled Caste Women shall have to be
taken by deleting the corresponding number of candidates from the bottom of the list
relating to Scheduled Castes’’.
3. In the judgment third read above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Public
Service Commission, Uttaranchal vs. Mamta Bisht (2010(12) SCC 204)” has disposed
of the case with the following directions:-
“Thus, appeals succeed and are allowed. Judgment and order of the High Court
dated 26.10.2005 passed in Writ Petition no.780/2003 (M/B) is hereby set aside. No
costs”
5. In the judgment fourth read above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 55 of 2019, Janhit Abhiyan Versus Union of India vide it’s
order dated 07.11.2022 has disposed of the case with following directions:-
“In view of the decision rendered by the majority consisting of Hon’ble Mr.
Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon’ble Mr.
Justice J.B. Pardiwala, the challenge raised to 103 rd Amendment to the Constitution
fails and the decision rendered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat remains in
minority.
5
“ Consequently, the Writ Petitions and other proceedings stand disposed of”.
i) In the G.O. fifth read above, Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate
Service Rules, 1996 have been issued.
ii) In the G.O. sixth read above, orders have been issued allotting the
following Roster points to Ex-Servicemen for the direct recruitment:
“RP No.13 & RP No.37
Out of 13 and 37 roster points for ex-servicemen, whether proviso can be
made for giving preference to one of the two points for women and if not
available, both the points with men may also be looked into.”
iii) In the G.O. seventh read above; orders have been issued amending
Rule-22 of A.P.State and Subordinate Service rules, 1996 as follows:
iv) In the G.O. eighth read above, orders have been issued providing 3%
of vacancies in case of Direct Recruitment for persons or class of
persons with disability of which one per cent, each shall be reserved
for persons suffering from:- a) blindness or low vision; b) hearing
impairment; c) locomotor disability or cerebral palsy. It was also
ordered that the Government may, having regard to the type of work
carried on in any department or establishment, by notification subject
to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in such notifications,
exempt any establishment from the provisions of this reservation, as
per the procedure prescribed, duly placing the proposal before the
Inter Departmental Committee headed by the Secretary, Department
for Women, Children, Differently Abled and Senior Citizens.
6
(1) for the existing order of rotation points 6th, 31st and 56th, the following
shall be substituted, namely,-
(2) in the proviso, for item (ii), the following shall be substituted namely,
“(ii) In the Second cycle of 100 roster points, the following points shall be
reserved as follows:-
In the third cycle of 100 roster points, the following points shall be
reserved as follows:-
vi) In the G.O. ninth read above, orders have been issued providing 3%
reservations in promotions for each of the categories of disabled, i.e.
6th , 31st and 56th Roster Points prescribed under Rule 22 of the Andhra
Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules.
vii) In the G.O. fourteenth read above, orders have been issued
amending Rule 22 of the A.P. State and Subordinate Service rules, 1996
as follows:-
7
“In rule 22, of the said rules;
(1) In sub-rule (1) in clause (ii): for the words, “Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes” the words “Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes
and Physically Handicapped Persons” shall be substituted.
(2) In sub-rule 2(a)(i) for the words “and six for Scheduled Tribe
employees”, the words “six for Scheduled Tribe and three for
Physically handicapped employees” shall be substituted.
For the words “Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes” the words
“Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Physically Handicapped
Persons” shall be substituted.
viii) In the G.O. eighteenth read above, orders have been issued stating that
as per Section-34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016,
four percent (4%) reservation has been provided in appointment and in
promotions in every Government establishment in favour of persons
with Benchmark Disabilities.
8
31 Deaf and Hard of Hearing (Open)
56 Locomotor Disability (Open)
86 Autism, Intellectual Disability, Specific Learning Disability,
Mental Illness and Multiple Disabilities (Open)
ix) In the said G.O., a provision was also made therein to give exemption
to Government establishments from this reservation by placing the
matter before the Inter Departmental Committee.
x) Based on the said orders, in the G.O. twenty third read above, orders
have been issued providing four percent (4%) reservation to the
persons with Benchmark disabilities in appointments and promotions.
It has also been directed therein that if any Department consider that
exemption is necessary in Government establishments from this
reservation, they shall place the matter before the Inter Departmental
Committee along with due justification.
xi) In the G.O. twelfth read above, orders have been issued providing
33 1/3% reservation to Women horizontally, in each category i.e.,
OC, BC-A, BC-B, BC-C, BC-D, BC-E, SC, ST, Persons with Bench Mark
Disabilities, Ex-serviceman and Meritorious Sportspersons in the
matter of direct recruitment to the posts, for which men and women
are equally suited, by superseding the earlier orders issued in the
matter.
xii) In the G.O. sixteenth read above, accordingly orders have been issued
amending Rule-22 of A.P. State and Subordinate Service rules, 1996
substituting sub-rule (2) of Rule-22-A of A.P. State and Subordinate
Service Rules, 1996, providing reservation to women Horizontally to
an extent of 33 1/3% of the posts in each category of Open
Competition, Backward Classes (Group-A), Backward Classes (Group-
B), Backward Classes (Group-C), Backward Classes (Group- D),
Backward Classes (Group-E), Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and
Physically Handicapped and Ex-servicemen and Meritorious
Sportsperson quota.
xiii) In the G.O. tenth read above, orders have been issued providing a sports
quota reservation of two percent (2%) for meritorious sports persons in
all posts of State Government Departments, Educational Institutions,
Local Bodies, Corporations, Boards, Authorities, Grandhalaya
Samsthas, Market Committees and other establishments which are
funded or aided by the State Government where direct recruitment is
one of the methods of appointment, hereinafter, as per the sports
policy.
9
xiv) Further, in the G.O. thirteenth read above, orders have been issued
providing two percent (2%) reservation to Meritorious Sports persons
horizontally in Direct recruitment in the existing 100 roster points as
per Rule-22(2)(e) of the A.P.State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996.
Roster Points 48 and 98 meant for Open Competition have been
earmarked to reservation under Sports quota in Direct recruitment.
Further, in the event of non availability of eligible sports persons, the
points reserved for them should be deemed to be allotted to open
competition in the same recruitment.
xv) In the G.O. fifteenth read above, orders have been issued amending
Rule-22 of A.P.State and Subordinate Service rules, 1996, providing two
percent (2%) reservation to meritorious Sports persons horizontally
in all categories of posts. Roster Points i.e., 48 (meritorious
sportsperson) (open) and 98 (meritorious sportsperson) (open) have
been fixed. It has also been ordered that in the event of non availability
of eligible sports persons, the points reserved for them should be
deemed to be allotted to open competition in the same recruitment.
xvi) In the G.O. seventeenth read above, orders have been issued for
implementation of 10% reservation to the Economically Weaker
Sections (EWS) for admissions into Educational Institutions in
accordance with the purport of the Constitution (One Hundred and
Third Amendment) Act, 2019 and as per the guidelines issued by
Government of India in this regard.
xvii) Based on the policy decision taken by Backward Classes Welfare (F)
Department, in the reference twentieth read above, orders have been
issued extending revised/ reiterated operational guidelines for
admission to Educational Intuitions. Further, in the G.O. twenty first
read above, operational guidelines have been issued for
implementation of 10% reservation to the Economically Weaker
Sections (EWS) for initial appointments in the Posts and Services under
the State Government. It has been specified therein that the persons
who are not covered under existing scheme of reservations for the
Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and the Socially and
Educationally Backward Classes and whose gross annual family
income is below Rs.8.00 lakhs are to be identified as Economically
Weaker Sections (EWS) for the benefit of reservation. The Income shall
also include income from all sources i.e. salary, agriculture, business,
profession, etc. for the financial year prior to the year of application.
xviii) Further in the G.O. twenty second read above, orders have been issued
amending Rule-22 of A.P. State and Subordinate Service rules, 1996,
fixing Roster Point Nos.12,21,32,42,50,61,73,82, 88 & 96, out of 100
Roster Points to Economically Weaker Sections(EWS) category.
10
(III) Need to study the existing policies of Horizontal Reservations:
i) In the G.O. twenty fourth read above, orders have been issued
constituting a Committee of officials under the Chairpersonship of Principal
Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department to study the Horizontal
Reservation in respect of Women, Persons with Benchmark Disabilities, Ex-
servicemen, Meritorious Sports persons, in the light of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court orders and directed to furnish appropriate proposals and guidelines
for implementation of Horizontal Reservation, and on how to operate 100
Roster Points horizontally in appointments by Direct recruitment and by
promotions for various categories of posts. The Committee consists of:-
ii) In the G.O. twenty fifth read above, Government have extended time
of the committee to submit the report up to 15.04.2023.
iii) In the reference twenty sixth read above, the Principal Secretary to
Government, Social Welfare Department and the Chairperson of the
Committee submitted report of the Committee. The Committee has
recommended among others, that-
11
2) Roster points earmarked in the existing Roster to the categories of
Women, Persons with Benchmark Disabilities, Ex-serviceman and
Meritorious Sports persons shall be deleted.
3) New 100 point cycles for Direct Recruitment and promotion have
been suggested
iv) The Committee has also recommended to the Government to revise the
policies of the Department for Women Children Differently Abled and Senior
Citizens, Home Department, Youth Advancement, Tourism and Culture
(Sports) Department, Department of Economically Weaker Sections Welfare
and further the General Administration Department shall take necessary
action to make amendments to the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate
Service Rules, 1996 based on the recommendations of the Committee for
implementations of Horizontal Reservations to the categories of Women,
Persons with Benchmark Disabilities, Ex-servicemen, Meritorious Sports
persons and also reservations to Economically Weaker Sections duly
following the Andhra Pradesh Government Business Rules.
12
NOTIFICATION
AMENDMENTS
In the said rules,
(1) In Rule-2, for clause (22), the following shall be substituted, namely;-
13
b. Deaf and hard hearing.
c. Loco motor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy
cured, dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy.
d. Autism, Intellectual disability, Mental illness.
e. Multiple disabilities from amongst persons under clauses (a) to
(d) including deaf-blindness in the posts identified for each
disabilities.”
14
27. SC
28. Open Competition
29. Backward Class(Group-A)
30. Open Competition
31. Open Competition
32. Economically Weaker Sections
33. ST
34. Open Competition
35. Backward Class(Group-B)
36. Open Competition
37. Open Competition
38. Open Competition
39. Backward Class(Group-D)
40. Open Competition
41. SC
42. Economically Weaker Sections
43. Backward Class(Group-D)
44. Backward Class(Group-E)
45. Backward Class(Group-A)
46. Open Competition
47. SC
48. Open Competition
49. Backward Class(Group-B)
50. Economically Weaker Sections
51. Open Competition
52. SC
53. Open Competition
54. Backward Class(Group-A)
55. Open Competition
56. Open Competition
57. Open Competition
58. ST
59. Open Competition
60. Backward Class(Group-B)
61. Economically Weaker Sections
62. SC
63. Open Competition
64. Backward Class(Group-D)
65. Open Competition
66. SC
67. Open Competition
68. Backward Class(Group-D)
69. Backward Class(Group-E)
70. Backward Class(Group-A)
71. Open Competition
15
72. SC
73. Economically Weaker Sections
74. Backward Class(Group-B)
75. ST
76. Open Competition
77. SC
78. Open Competition
79. Backward Class(Group-A)
80. Open Competition
81. Backward Class(Group-B)
82. Economically Weaker Sections
83. ST
84. Open Competition
85. Backward Class(Group-B)
86 Open Competition
87. SC
88. Economically Weaker Sections
89. Backward Class(Group-D)
90. Open Competition
91. SC
92. Open Competition
93. Backward Class(Group-D)
94. Backward Class(Group-E)
95. Backward Class(Group-B)
96. Economically Weaker Sections
97. SC
98. Open Competition
99. Backward Class(Group-B)
100. Open Competition
(iv) For the proviso to Clause (e) under the table, the following shall be
substituted, namely:-
Operational Guidelines:
16
(ii) Social reservations in favour of SC, ST and OBC under Article
16(4) of the Constitution of India are 'vertical reservations'.
Special reservations in favour of physically handicapped,
women etc., under Articles 16(1) or 15(3) are 'horizontal
reservations'. Where a vertical reservation is made in favour of a
backward class under Article 16(4), the candidates belonging to
such backward class, may compete for non- reserved posts and
if they are appointed to the non-reserved posts on their own
merit, their numbers will not be counted against the quota
reserved for the respective backward class.
Illustration:
(vi) If 15 posts are reserved for SCs (of which the quota for women is
five), 15 SC candidates shall have to be first listed in accordance
with merit, from out of the successful eligible candidates. If such
list of 15 candidates contains five SC women candidates, then
there is no need to disturb the list by including any further SC
women candidate. On the other hand, if the list of 15 SC
candidates contains only three woman candidates, then the next
17
two SC woman candidates in accordance with merit, will have
to be included in the list and corresponding number of
candidates from the bottom of such list shall have to be deleted,
so as to ensure that the final 15 selected SC candidates contain
five women SC candidates.
18
1. Principal Secretary/Secretary to Government,
Department for Women, Children,
Differently Abled and Senior Citizens : Chairperson
2. The Director/Commissioner, Department for
the Welfare of Differently Abled Transgender and
Senior Citizens : Member- Convener
(iii) All the Departments of Secretariat shall identify the posts for
which the quota for Persons with Benchmark Disabilities shall
be applied and the posts for which exemption is required and
submit appropriate proposals to the Department for Women
Children Differently Abled and Senior Citizens for placing the
matter before the foresaid Inter Departmental Committee.”
(i) In the Category of Posts which are identified suitable for person
with benchmark disabilities, a person with benchmark disability
cannot be denied the right to compete for appointment by direct
recruitment against an Unreserved vacancy. Thus a person with
a benchmark disability can be appointed by direct recruitment
vacancy not specifically reserved for the PBDs provided the post
is identified suitable for PBDs of the relevant category.
19
format given below for determining/effecting reservation for the
Persons with Benchmark Disabilities to be filled by direct
recruitment where cadre strength is more than five (5).
Year Cycl Poin Nam Identifie Unreserved Name of the Whethe Remark
of e t e of d Or Reserved Person r the s, if
Recruitm No No Post suitable appointed person any
ent for and date appoint
persons of appoint ed is in
with ment a,b,c
Benchma and
rk (d& e)
Disabiliti or None
es
covered
under
the
followin
g
respectiv
e
categorie
s
a b c (d&e
)
Respective categories:
20
In order to provide representation for each category of persons
with Benchmark disabilities, each Register shall have cycles of
100 points and each cycle of 100 points shall be divided into four
Blocks, comprising the following points:
21
vi) After all the 100 points of the roster covered, a fresh cycle of 100
points shall start.
iii) In the second cycle and third cycle also, the procedure indicated
in the paragraph above shall be followed for filling up of the five
categories of disabilities reserved for Persons with Benchmark
Disabilities. After completion of three cycles (300 points), the
department/competent authority shall ensure that the Women
are represented to the extent of 33 1/3% in the direct
recruitments.
22
that if no vacancy can be reserved in a particular block, it shall
be carried over into the next block.
(iii) In case none of the vacancies falls on point reserved for the SCs,
the candidate under the benchmark disability belonging to SC
shall be adjusted in future against the next available vacancy
reserved for SCs.
23
be kept on a supernumerary post until a suitable post is
available or he attains the age of superannuation, whichever is
earlier.
(vi) However, in case the PBDs for whom the supernumerary post
was created is eligible for next promotion to higher pay level,
and it is not possible to adjust the employee against any post, a
fresh creation of supernumerary post in next higher level will be
required by surrendering the previously created supernumerary
post at the lower level, and the proposal for the same shall be
submitted to the Finance Department. For creation of any
supernumerary post in this regard, the administrative
department in Andhra Pradesh Secretariat shall submit proposal
to Finance Department.
24
candidates with benchmark disabilities who are lower in merit
than the last candidate in merit list but, otherwise found suitable
for appointment, if necessary, by relaxed standards.
(ii) The same relaxed standard should be applied for all the PBD
candidates with benchmark disabilities, irrespective of whether
they belong to the Unreserved/SC/ST/BC/EWS category. No
further relaxation of standards will be considered or admissible
in favour of any candidate from any category whatsoever.
25
iv) Reservation registers / Roster registers are only an aid to ensure
that Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward
Classes get quota reserved for them in direct recruitment.
26
i) Two percent (2%) reservation shall be provided to Meritorious
Sportspersons horizontally in direct recruitment.
27
a) The cycle of hundred roster points for promotions to the
categories of SCs, STs and Persons with Benchmark
Disabilities has already been prescribed. In the said Roster,
Points for Women are mentioned in the respective
category. Here the Roster points earmarked for women in
respect of SCs, STs and Persons with Benchmark
Disabilities shall be deleted therein. The Roster points
earmarked for Persons with Benchmark Disabilities for
promotions in existing Roaster shall also be deleted.
28
26. Open Competition
27. SC
28. Open Competition
29. Open Competition
30. Open Competition
31. Open Competition
32. Open Competition
33. ST
34. Open Competition
35. Open Competition
36. Open Competition
37. Open Competition
38. Open Competition
39. Open Competition
40. Open Competition
41. SC
42. Open Competition
43. Open Competition
44. Open Competition
45. Open Competition
46. Open Competition
47. SC
48. Open Competition
49. Open Competition
50. Open Competition
51. Open Competition
52. SC
53. Open Competition
54. Open Competition
55. Open Competition
56. Open Competition
57. Open Competition
58. ST
59. Open Competition
60. Open Competition
61. Open Competition
62. SC
63. Open Competition
64. Open Competition
65. Open Competition
66. SC
67. Open Competition
68. Open Competition
69. Open Competition
70. Open Competition
29
71. Open Competition
72. SC
73. Open Competition
74. Open Competition
75. ST
76. Open Competition
77. SC
78. Open Competition
79. Open Competition
80. Open Competition
81. Open Competition
82. Open Competition
83. ST
84. Open Competition
85. Open Competition
86 Open Competition
87. SC
88. Open Competition
89. Open Competition
90. Open Competition
91. SC
92. Open Competition
93. Open Competition
94. Open Competition
95. Open Competition
96. Open Competition
97. SC
98. Open Competition
99. Open Competition
100. Open Competition
(4) In Rule 22-A, after sub rule (4), the following shall be added, namely;
30
(5) Horizontal reservation for women:
31
taken in the order of merit on similar exercise as done in respect
of OC quota.”
To
The Commissioner, Printing, Stationery and Stores Purchase, A.P., Vijayawada
( for publication of the notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette and
supply 300 copies to Government)
The Department for Women, Children, Differently Abled and Senior Citizens
The Home Department
The Youth Advancement, Tourism and Culture (Sports) Department
The Department of Economically Weaker Sections Welfare
The Human Resources (Higher Education) Department
All Departments of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat
All Heads of Departments
The Registrars of all Universities in the State
All the Managing Directors of Public Sector undertakings/Corporations through the
Secretaries of the Administrative Departments in the Secretariat
The Special Government Pleader, Office of Learned Advocate General,
Andhra Pradesh High Court Buildings, Amaravati
The Registrar General, A.P.High Court, Amaravati (with a covering letter)
The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Vijayawada
All District Collectors
All District Judges
All Service Sections in the General Administration Department
The Law Department
The Finance Department
The General Administration (Cabinet) Department
The Administrative Officer, Government Pleaders Office,
A.P.High Court, Amaravati
Copy to:
The P.S. to Special Chief Secretary to Chief Minister
The P.S. to Chief Secretary to Government
The P.S. to Secretary to Government (Services & HRM)
Sf/Sc
//FORWARDED:: BY ORDER//
SECTION OFFICER
32