Scribd
Upload
28 views1 page

Tutorial 9 Defining Relation Resolution Design Generator

This document describes a multifactor factorial experiment with 4 factors (time, concentration, pressure, and temperature), each with 2 levels, yielding 16 runs. The results of the experiment are presented in a table with the run order, factor levels, and measured yield for each run. The document asks to: (1) identify which factors appear to have large effects based on a normal probability plot, (2) conduct an ANOVA to determine significant factors, (3) project the design as a full factorial for significant factors, and (4) repeat with an alternate fractional factorial design to check interpretations.

Uploaded by

ige
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
28 views1 page

Tutorial 9 Defining Relation Resolution Design Generator

This document describes a multifactor factorial experiment with 4 factors (time, concentration, pressure, and temperature), each with 2 levels, yielding 16 runs. The results of the experiment are presented in a table with the run order, factor levels, and measured yield for each run. The document asks to: (1) identify which factors appear to have large effects based on a normal probability plot, (2) conduct an ANOVA to determine significant factors, (3) project the design as a full factorial for significant factors, and (4) repeat with an alternate fractional factorial design to check interpretations.

Uploaded by

ige
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Tutorial 9

CH 7, Defining Relation, Resolution, Design Generator,


Multifactor Factorial
In a process development study on yield, four factors were studied, each at two levels: time (A), concentration (B),
pressure (C), and temperature (D). A single replicate of a 24 design was run, and the resulting data are shown in the
following table:

Actual
Run Run Yield Factor Levels
Number Order A B C D (lbs) Low (-) High (+)
1 5 – – – – 12 A (h) 2.5 3.0
2 9 + – – – 18 B (%) 14 18
3 8 – + – – 13 C (psi) 60 80
4 13 + + – – 16 D (C) 225 250
5 3 – – + – 17
6 7 + – + – 15
7 14 – + + – 20
8 1 + + + – 15
9 6 – – – + 10
10 11 + – – + 25
11 2 – + – + 13
12 15 + + – + 24
13 4 – – + + 19
14 16 + – + + 21
15 10 – + + + 17
16 12 + + + + 23

(a) Considering the following normal probability plot of the effect estimates, which factors appear to have large
effects?

(b) Conduct an analysis of variance using the normal


probability plot in part (a) for guidance in forming an
error term. What are your conclusions?

4 1
(d) Analyze the data as if it came from a 2IV design with I=ABCD. Project the design into a full factorial in the
subset of the original four factors that appear to be significant.

(e) Repeat part (d) using I=–ABCD. Does use of the alternate fraction change your interpretation of the data?

You might also like