Who Chromatography Draft
Who Chromatography Draft
Who Chromatography Draft
905
February 2022
Draft for comments
2 1.14.1 CHROMATOGRAPHY
Please send any comments you may have on this draft working document to Dr Herbert Schmidt,
Technical Officer, Norms and Standards for Pharmaceuticals, Technical Standards and Specifications
(email: [email protected]), with a copy to Ms Sinéad Jones (email: [email protected]) by 25 March 2022.
Our working documents are sent out electronically and they will be placed on the WHO Medicines website
(https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-and-policy-standards/standards-and-
specifications/pharmaceuticals/current-projects) for comments under the “Working documents in public
consultation” link. If you wish to receive our draft guidelines, please send your e-mail address to
[email protected] and your name will be added to our electronic mailing list.
7 .
8 © World Health Organization 2022
9
10 All rights reserved.
11
12 This is a draft. The content of this document is not final, and the text may be subject to revisions before publication. The
13 document may not be reviewed, abstracted, quoted, reproduced, transmitted, distributed, translated or adapted, in part or in
14 whole, in any form or by any means without the permission of the World Health Organization.
37 1.14.1 CHROMATOGRAPHY
38
Description Date
39
40
47
Working document QAS/21.905
page 3
48 1.14.1 CHROMATOGRAPHY
52 INTRODUCTION
61 This chapter contains definitions and calculations of common parameters and generally
62 applicable requirements for system suitability. The principles of separation, apparatus
63 and methods are given in the corresponding general chapters.
64 DEFINITIONS
65 The system suitability and acceptance criteria in monographs have been set using
66 parameters as defined below. With some equipment, certain parameters, such as the
67 signal-to-noise ratio and resolution, can be calculated using software provided by the
68 manufacturer. It is the responsibility of the user to ensure that the calculation methods
69 used in the software are equivalent to the requirements of The International
70 Pharmacopoeia and to make any necessary corrections if this is not the case.
71
72
Working document QAS/21.905
page 4
73 Chromatogram
78
79 Figure 1
80 VM = hold-up volume;
81 tM = hold-up time;
𝑡𝑅 − 𝑡0
94 𝐾0 =
𝑡𝑡 − 𝑡0
95 tR = retention time;
99 The dwell volume (also known as gradient delay volume) is the volume between the
100 point at which the eluents meet and the inlet of the column. It can be determined using
101 the following procedure:
102 Column: replace the chromatographic column by an appropriate capillary tubing (e.g. 1
103 m × 0.12 mm).
20 - 30 0 100
Working document QAS/21.905
page 6
109 Determine the time (t0.5) in minutes when the absorbance has increased by 50 per cent
110 (see Figure 2).
111 𝐷 = 𝑡𝐷 × 𝐹
115
116 Figure 2
117 Note: where applicable, this measurement is performed with the autosampler in the
118 inject position so as to include the injection loop volume in the dwell volume.
120 Time required for elution of an unretained component (Figure 1, baseline scale being in
121 minutes or seconds).
124
Working document QAS/21.905
page 7
126 The volume of the mobile phase required for elution of an unretained component. It
127 may be calculated from the hold-up time and the flow rate (F) in millilitres per minute
128 using the following equation:
129 𝑉𝑀 = 𝑡𝑀 × 𝐹
132 Peak
133 The portion of a chromatogram recording the detector response when a single
134 component (or 2 or more unresolved components) is eluted from the column.
135 The peak response may be represented by the peak area or the peak height (h).
137 The peak-to-valley ratio may be employed as a system suitability criterion when the
138 baseline separation between two peaks is not achieved (Figure 3).
139
140 Figure 3
Working document QAS/21.905
page 8
𝑝 𝐻𝑝
141 =
𝑣 𝐻𝑣
143 Hv = height above the extrapolated baseline at the lowest point of the curve separating
144 the minor and major peaks.
145 Plate height (H) (synonym: height equivalent to one theoretical plate {HETP})
146 Ratio of the column length (L), in micrometers, to the plate number (N):
𝐿
147 H=
𝑁
𝑡𝑅 2
153 𝑁 = 5.54 ( )
𝑊ℎ
156 The plate number varies with the component as well as with the column, the column
157 temperature, the mobile phase and the retention time.
159 The ratio of the plate height (H), in micrometers, to the particle diameter (dp) in
160 micrometers:
Working document QAS/21.905
page 9
𝐻
161 h=
𝑑𝑝
163 The relative retardation, used in thin-layer chromatography, is calculated as the ratio of
164 the distances travelled by the spot of the compound of interest and a reference
165 compound (Figure 4).
167 Figure 4
172 The relative retention is calculated as an estimate using the following equation:
𝑡𝑅𝑖 − 𝑡𝑀
173 𝑟=
𝑡𝑅𝑠𝑡 − 𝑡𝑀
175 tRst = retention time of the reference peak (usually the peak corresponding to the
176 substance to be examined);
Working document QAS/21.905
page 10
𝑡𝑅𝑖
180 𝑟𝐺 =
𝑡𝑅𝑠𝑡
181 Unless otherwise indicated, the values for relative retention stated in monographs
182 correspond to unadjusted relative retention.
185 The resolution between peaks of 2 components (Figure 1) may be calculated using the
186 following equation:
1.18(𝑡𝑅2 − 𝑡𝑅1 )
187 𝑅𝑠 =
𝑤ℎ1 + 𝑤ℎ2
1.18𝑎(𝑅𝐹2 − 𝑅𝐹1 )
194 𝑅𝑠 =
𝑤ℎ1 + 𝑤ℎ2
200 The retardation factor, used in thin-layer chromatography, is the ratio of the distance
201 from the point of application to the centre of the spot and the distance simultaneously
202 travelled by the solvent front from the point of application (Figure 4).
𝑏
203 𝑅𝐹 =
𝑎
207 The retention factor (also known as mass distribution ratio (Dm) or capacity factor (k′))
208 is defined as:
213 The retention factor of a component may be determined from the chromatogram using
214 the following equation:
𝑡𝑅 − 𝑡𝑀
215 𝑘=
𝑡𝑀
219 The time elapsed between the injection of the sample and the appearance of the
220 maximum peak response of the eluted sample zone (Figure 1, baseline scale being in
221 minutes or seconds).
223 The volume of the mobile phase required for elution of a compound. It may be
224 calculated from the retention time (tR) and the flow rate (F) in millilitres per minute
225 using the following equation:
226 𝑉𝑅 = 𝑡𝑅 × 𝐹
230
231 Figure 5
235 time of an unretained compound (t0) and the flow rate (F) in millilitres per minute using
236 the following equation:
237 𝑉0 = 𝑡0 × 𝐹
239 The relative retention calculated for two adjacent peaks (by convention, the value of the
240 separation factor is always > 1):
241 α = k2/k1
245 The short-term noise influences the precision and accuracy of quantitation. The signal-
246 to-noise ratio is calculated using the following equation:
2𝐻
247 𝑆/𝑁 =
ℎ
248
250
252 If a baseline of 20 times the width at half-height is not obtainable because of peaks due
253 to the solvents or reagents, or arising from the mobile phase or the sample matrix, or
Working document QAS/21.905
page 16
254 due to the gas chromatographic temperature programme, a baseline of at least 5 times
255 the width at half-height is permitted.
257 The symmetry factor of a peak (also known as the asymmetry factor or tailing factor)
258 (Figure 8) is calculated using the following equation:
𝑤0.05
259 𝐴𝑠 =
2𝑑
261 d = distance between the perpendicular dropped from the peak maximum and the
262 leading edge of the peak at one-twentieth of the peak height.
263 An As value of 1.0 signifies symmetry. When As > 1.0, the peak is tailing. When As <
264 1.0, the peak is fronting.
265
266 Figure 8
267
268
Working document QAS/21.905
page 17
275 𝑦𝑖 = individual values expressed as peak area, peak height or ratio of areas by the
276 internal standardisation method;
287 𝑉𝑡 = 𝑡𝑡 × 𝐹
289 This section only covers liquid chromatography and gas chromatography.
Working document QAS/21.905
page 18
290 The various components of the equipment employed must be qualified and capable of
291 achieving the performance required to conduct the test or assay.
292 The system suitability tests represent an integral part of the analytical procedure and
293 are used to ensure the adequate performance of the chromatographic system. The
294 column plate number, retention factor (mass distribution ratio), system repeatability,
295 signal-to-noise, symmetry factor and resolution/peak-to-valley ratio are the parameters
296 that may be employed in assessing the performance of the chromatographic system.
297 When stated in the individual monograph, in cases of complex chromatographic
298 profiles (e.g. for biotechnological/biological products), visual comparison of the
299 profiles can be used as a system suitability test.
310 Retention times and relative retentions may be provided in monographs for information
311 purposes only, unless otherwise stated in the monograph. There are no acceptance
312 criteria applied to relative retentions.
313 Compliance with the system suitability criteria is required throughout the
314 chromatographic procedure. No sample analysis is acceptable unless the suitability of
315 the system has been demonstrated.
Working document QAS/21.905
page 19
316 The following requirements are to be fulfilled, in addition to any other system
317 suitability criteria stated in the monograph. When specific requirements are stated in
318 the monograph, they supersede the requirements mentioned in this chapter:
320 In an assay of an active substance or an excipient, where the target value is 100 per cent
321 for a pure substance, and a system repeatability requirement is not specified, the
322 maximum permitted relative standard deviation (%RSDmax) for the defined limits is
323 calculated for a series (n = 3 to 6) of injections of the reference solution. The maximum
324 permitted relative standard deviation of the peak response does not exceed the
325 appropriate value given in Table 1.
𝐾𝐵√𝑛
326 %RSDmax =
𝑡90%, 𝑛−1
331 B = upper limit given in the definition of the individual monograph minus 100 per cent;
333 t90%,n-1 = Student’s t at the 90 per cent probability level (double sided) with n−1 degrees
334 of freedom.
Working document QAS/21.905
page 20
336 B = upper limit of content given in the individual monograph minus 100 per cent.
338 The signal-to-noise ratio is used to define the system sensitivity. The limit of
339 quantitation (corresponding to a signal-to-noise ratio of 10) is equal to or less than the
340 reporting threshold.
342 Unless otherwise stated, in a test or assay, the symmetry factor (tailing factor) of the
343 peak used for quantitation is 0.8 to 1.8.
345 The chromatographic conditions described have been validated during the elaboration
346 of the monograph.
347 The extent to which the various parameters of a chromatographic test may be adjusted
348 without fundamentally modifying the pharmacopoeial analytical procedures are listed
349 below. Changes other than those indicated require revalidation of the procedure.
350 Multiple adjustments can have a cumulative effect on the performance of the system
351 and are to be properly evaluated by the users. This is particularly important in cases
Working document QAS/21.905
page 21
352 where the separation pattern is described as a profile. In those cases, a risk assessment
353 has to be carried out.
354 Any adjustments must be made on the basis of the pharmacopoeial procedure.
359 When a pharmacopoeial analytical procedure has been adjusted according to the
360 requirements stated below, no further adjustments are allowed without appropriate
361 revalidation.
362 Compliance with the system suitability criteria is required to verify that conditions for
363 satisfactory performance of the test or assay are achieved.
370 For some parameters, the adjustments are explicitly defined in the monograph to ensure
371 the system suitability.
373 Composition of the mobile phase: the amount of the minor solvent components may be
374 adjusted by ± 30 per cent relative or ± 2 per cent absolute, whichever is the larger; no
375 other component is altered by more than 10 per cent absolute. A minor component
376 comprises less than or equal to (100/n) per cent, n being the total number of components
Working document QAS/21.905
page 22
377 of the mobile phase. For a minor component at 10 per cent of the mobile phase, a 30
378 per cent relative adjustment allows a range of 7-13 per cent whereas a 2 per cent absolute
379 adjustment allows a range of 8-12 per cent, the relative value therefore being the larger;
380 for a minor component at 5 per cent of the mobile phase, a 30 per cent relative
381 adjustment allows a range of 3.5-6.5 per cent whereas a 2 per cent absolute adjustment
382 allows a range of 3-7 per cent, the absolute value being the larger in this case.
383 pH of the aqueous component of the mobile phase: ± 0.2 pH units, unless otherwise
384 prescribed.
385 Concentration of salts in the buffer component of a mobile phase: ± 10 per cent.
386 Application volume: 10-20 per cent of the prescribed volume if using fine particle size
387 plates (2-10 µm).
403 the plate number (N) is within – 25 per cent to + 50 per cent, relative to the
404 prescribed column. These changes are acceptable provided the system
405 suitability criteria are fulfilled, and selectivity and elution order of the
406 specified impurities to be controlled are demonstrated to be equivalent.
407 • Internal diameter: in absence of a change in particle size and/or length, the
408 internal diameter of the column may be adjusted.
409 Caution is necessary when the adjustment results in smaller peak volumes, due to a
410 smaller particle size or a smaller internal diameter, a situation which may require
411 adjustments to minimize extra-column band broadening by factors such as instrument
412 connections, detector cell volume and sampling rate, and injection volume.
413 When the particle size is changed, the flow rate requires adjustment because smaller-
414 particle columns will require higher linear velocities for the same performance (as
415 measured by reduced plate height). The flow rate is adjusted for both the change in
416 column diameter and particle size using the following equation:
418 dc1 = internal diameter of the column indicated in the monograph, in millimetres;
422 When a change is made from ≥ 3-µm to < 3-µm particles in isocratic separations, an
423 additional increase in linear velocity (by adjusting the flow rate) may be justified,
424 provided that the column performance does not drop by more than 20 per cent.
425 Similarly, when a change is made from < 3-µm to ≥ 3-µm particles, an additional
Working document QAS/21.905
page 24
426 reduction of linear velocity (flow rate) may be justified to avoid reduction in column
427 performance by more than 20 per cent.
428 After an adjustment due to a change in column dimensions, an additional change in flow
429 rate of ± 50 per cent is permitted.
432 Further adjustments in analytical procedure conditions (mobile phase, temperature, pH,
433 etc.) may be required, within the permitted ranges described under System Suitability
434 and Adjustment of chromatographic conditions in this chapter.
436 • Composition: the amount of the minor solvent components may be adjusted
437 by ± 30 per cent relative (see examples under Thin-layer chromatography);
438 no component is altered by more than 10 per cent absolute. A minor
439 component comprises less than or equal to (100/n) per cent, n being the total
440 number of components of the mobile phase;
441 • pH of the aqueous component of the mobile phase: ± 0.2 pH units, unless
442 otherwise prescribed;
443 • Concentration of salts in the buffer component of a mobile phase: ± 10 per
444 cent;
445 • Flow rate: in absence of a change in column dimensions, an adjustment of the
446 flow rate by ± 50 per cent is permitted.
449
Working document QAS/21.905
page 25
451 When the column dimensions are changed, the following equation may be used for
452 adjusting the injection volume:
460 This equation may not be applicable to changes from TPP columns to SPP columns.
461 Even in the absence of any column dimension change, the injection volume may be
462 varied provided System Suitability criteria remain within their established acceptability
463 limits. When the injection volume is decreased, special attention is given to (the limit
464 of) detection and repeatability of the peak response(s) to be determined. An increase is
465 permitted provided, in particular, the linearity and resolution of the peak(s) to be
466 determined remain satisfactory.
468 The adjustment of chromatographic conditions for gradient systems requires greater
469 caution than for isocratic systems.
473 stationary phase (i.e. chromatographic support, surface modification and extent
474 of chemical modification must be similar); a change from Totally Porous Particle
475 (TPP) columns to Superficially Porous Particle (SPP) columns is allowed
476 provided the above-mentioned requirements are met.
477 • Column dimensions (particle size, length): the particle size and/or length of the
478 column may be modified provided that the ratio of the column length (L) to the
479 particle size (dp) remains constant or in the range between − 25 per cent to +50
480 per cent of the prescribed L/dp ratio.
481 • Adjustments from totally porous to superficially porous particles: for the
482 application of particle-size adjustment from totally porous to superficially
483 porous particles, other combinations of L and dp can be used provided that the
484 ratio (tR/wh)2 is within – 25 per cent to + 50 per cent, relative to the prescribed
485 column, for each peak used to check the system suitability, as stated in this
486 chapter and the individual monograph. These changes are acceptable provided
487 system suitability criteria are fulfilled, and selectivity and elution order of the
488 specified impurities to be controlled are demonstrated to be equivalent.
489 • Internal diameter: in the absence of a change in particle size and/or length, the
490 internal diameter of the column may be adjusted.
491 Caution is necessary when the adjustment results in smaller peak volumes due to a
492 smaller particle size or a smaller internal diameter, a situation which may require
493 adjustments to minimize extra-column band broadening by factors such as instrument
494 connections, detector cell volume and sampling rate, and injection volume.
495 When the particle size is changed, the flow rate requires adjustment because smaller-
496 particle columns will require higher linear velocities for the same performance (as
497 measured by reduced plate height). The flow rate is adjusted for both the change in
498 column diameter and particle size using the following equation:
502 dc1 = internal diameter of the column indicated in the monograph, in millimetres;
506 A change in column dimensions, and thus in column volume, impacts the gradient
507 volume which controls selectivity. Gradients are adjusted to the column volume by
508 changing the gradient volume in proportion to the column volume. This applies to every
509 gradient segment volume. Since the gradient volume is the gradient time, tG, multiplied
510 by the flow rate, F, the gradient time for each gradient segment needs to be adjusted to
511 maintain a constant ratio of the gradient volume to the column volume (expressed as L
512 x dc2). Thus, the new gradient time, tG2 can be calculated from the original gradient
513 time, tG1, the flow rate(s) and the column dimensions as follows:
515 Thus, the change in conditions for gradient elution requires three steps:
516 (1) adjust the column length and particle size according to L/dp;
517 (2) adjust the flow rate for changes in particle size and column diameter; and
518 (3) adjust the gradient time of each segment for changes in column length, diameter
519 and flow rate. The example below illustrates this process.
Working document QAS/21.905
page 28
520 Table 2
521 (1) 11 per cent increase within allowed L/dp change of – 25 per cent to + 50 per cent.
523 (3) calculated using tG2 = tG1 x (F1 / F2) [(L2 x dc22) / (L1 x dc12)].
526 Further adjustments in analytical procedure conditions (mobile phase, temperature, pH,
527 etc.) may be required, within the permitted ranges described under System Suitability
528 and Adjustment of Chromatographic Conditions in this chapter.
533 o the principal peak(s) elute(s) within ± 15 per cent of the retention time(s)
534 obtained with the original conditions; this requirement does not apply
535 when the column dimensions are changed; and
536 o the composition of the mobile phase and the gradient are such that the
537 first peaks are sufficiently retained and the last peaks are eluted.
538 • pH of the aqueous component of the mobile phase: ± 0.2 pH units, unless
539 otherwise prescribed.
540 • Concentration of salts in the buffer component of a mobile phase: ± 10 per cent.
541 Where compliance with the system suitability criteria cannot be achieved, it is often
542 preferable to consider the dwell volume or to change the column.
544 The configuration of the equipment employed may significantly alter the resolution,
545 retention time and relative retentions described. Should this occur, it may be due to a
546 change in dwell volume. Monographs preferably include an isocratic step before the
547 start of the gradient programme so that an adaptation can be made to the gradient time
548 points to take account of differences in dwell volume between the system used for
549 analytical procedure development and that actually used. It is the user’s responsibility
550 to adapt the length of the isocratic step to the analytical equipment used. If the dwell
551 volume used during the elaboration of the monograph is given in the monograph, the
552 time points (t min) stated in the gradient table may be replaced by adapted time points
553 (tc min), calculated using the following equation:
(𝐷 − 𝐷0 )
554 𝑡𝑐 = 𝑡 −
𝐹
556 D0 = dwell volume used for development of the analytical procedure, in millilitres;
558 The isocratic step introduced for this purpose may be omitted if validation data for
559 application of the analytical procedure without this step is available.
563 When the column dimensions are changed, the following equation may be used for
564 adjusting the injection volume:
572 This equation may not be applicable to changes from TPP columns to SPP columns.
573 Even in the absence of any column dimension change, the injection volume may be
574 varied provided system suitability criteria remain within their established acceptability
575 limits. When the injection volume is decreased, special attention is given to (the limit
576 of) detection and repeatability of the peak response(s) to be determined. An increase is
577 permitted provided, in particular, the linearity and resolution of the peak(s) to be
578 determined remain satisfactory.
579
Working document QAS/21.905
page 31
595 The above changes are acceptable provided system suitability criteria are fulfilled and
596 selectivity and elution order of the specified impurities to be controlled are
597 demonstrated to be equivalent.
599 May be varied provided system suitability criteria remain within their established
600 acceptability limits. When the injection volume is decreased, or the split ratio is
601 increased, special attention is given to (the limit of) detection and repeatability of the
602 peak response(s) to be determined. An increase in injection volume or a decrease in
603 split ratio is permitted provided, in particular, the linearity and resolution of the peak(s)
604 to be determined remain satisfactory.
Working document QAS/21.905
page 32
608 QUANTITATION
609 The following quantitation approaches may be used in general texts or monographs:
610
613 Standard solutions with several graded amounts of a reference standard of the
614 compound to be analysed are prepared in a range that has been demonstrated to give a
615 linear response, and a fixed volume of these standard solutions is injected. With the
616 chromatograms obtained, a calibration function is prepared by plotting the peak areas
617 or peak heights on the ordinate against the amount of reference standard on the abscissa.
618 The calibration function is generally obtained by linear regression. Then, a sample
619 solution is prepared according to the procedure specified in the individual monograph.
620 The chromatography is performed under the same operating conditions as for the
621 preparation of the calibration function, the peak area or peak height of the compound to
622 be analysed is measured, and the amount of the compound is read out or calculated from
623 the calibration function.
629 compound by comparing the responses obtained. In this method, all procedures, such
630 as the injection, must be carried out under constant conditions.
633 In the internal standard method, a stable compound is chosen as an internal standard
634 which shows a retention time close to that of the compound to be analysed, and whose
635 peak is well separated from all other peaks in the chromatogram. Several standard
636 solutions containing a fixed amount of the internal standard and graded amounts of a
637 reference standard of the compound to be analysed are prepared. Based on the
638 chromatograms obtained by injection of a fixed volume of individual standard solutions,
639 the ratio of peak area or peak height of the reference standard to that of the internal
640 standard is calculated. A calibration function by plotting these ratios on the ordinate
641 against the amount of the reference standard or the ratio of the amount of reference
642 standard to that of the internal standard on the abscissa is prepared. The calibration
643 function is generally obtained by linear regression. Then, a sample solution containing
644 the internal standard in the same amount as in the standard solutions used for the
645 preparation of the calibration function is prepared according to the procedure specified
646 in the individual monograph. The chromatography is performed under the same
647 operating conditions as for the preparation of the calibration function. The ratio of the
648 peak area or peak height of the compound to be analysed to that of the internal standard
649 is calculated, and the amount of the compound is read out or calculated from the
650 calibration function.
656 under fixed conditions to determine the amount of the compound to be analysed by
657 comparing the ratios obtained.
667 The detector sensitivity is the signal output per unit concentration or unit mass of a
668 substance in the mobile phase entering the detector. The relative detector response
669 factor, commonly referred to as response factor, expresses the sensitivity of a detector
670 for a given substance relative to a standard substance. The correction factor is the
671 reciprocal of the response factor.
672 In tests for related substances, any correction factors indicated in the monograph are
673 applied (i.e. when the response factor is outside the range 0.8-1.2).
675 Peaks due to solvents and reagents or arising from the mobile phase or the sample matrix
676 are disregarded.
678 Integration of the peak area of any impurity that is not completely separated from the
679 principal peak is preferably performed by tangential skim (Figure 9).
Working document QAS/21.905
page 35
680
681 Figure 9
683 When the related substances test prescribes a limit for the total of impurities or a
684 quantitative determination of an impurity, it is important to choose an appropriate
685 reporting threshold and appropriate conditions for the integration of the peak areas.
686 In such tests, the reporting threshold (i.e. the limit above which a peak is reported) is
687 generally 0.05 per cent.
688
689 ***