Financial Management Notes SRK UNIT 2
Financial Management Notes SRK UNIT 2
Capital Budgeting: Principles and techniques - Nature of capital budgeting- Identifying relevant cash
flows - Evaluation Techniques: Payback, Accounting rate of return, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of
Return, Profitability Index - Comparison of DCF techniques - Project selection under capital rationing -
Inflation and capital budgeting - Concept and measurement of cost of capital - Specific cost and overall
cost of capital
The main characteristic of a capital expenditure is that the expenditure is incurred at one point of
time whereas benefits of the expenditure are realized at different points of time in future. In
simple language we may say that a capital expenditure is an expenditure incurred for acquiring
or improving the fixed assets, the benefits of which are expected to be received over a number of
years in future.
(1) Cost of acquisition of permanent assets as land and building, plant and machinery, goodwill,
etc.
(2) Cost of addition, expansion, improvement or alteration in the fixed assets.
(3) Cost of replacement of permanent assets.
(4) Research and development project cost, etc.
Charles T. Horngreen has defined capital budgeting as, “Capital budgeting is long term planning
for making and financing proposed capital outlays.”
According to G.C. Philippatos, “Capital budgeting is concerned with the allocation of the firm’s
scarce financial resources among the available market opportunities. The consideration of
investment opportunities involves the comparison of the expected future streams of earnings
from a project with the immediate and subsequent streams of earning from a project, with the
immediate and subsequent streams of expenditures for it”.
Richard and Greenlaw have referred to capital budgeting as acquiring inputs with long-run
return.
In the words of Lynch, “Capital budgeting consists in planning development of available capital
for the purpose of maximizing the long term profitability of the concern.”
From the above description, it may be concluded that the important features which
distinguish capital budgeting decision from the ordinary day to day business decisions are:
(1) Capital budgeting decisions involve the exchange of current funds for the benefits to be
achieved in future;
(2) The future benefits are expected to be realized over a series of years;
(3) The funds are invested in non-flexible and long term activities;
(4) They have a long term and significant effect on the profitability of the concern;
(7) They are ‘strategic’ investment decisions, involving large sums of money, major departure
from the past practices of the firm, significant change of the firm’s expected earnings associated
with high degree of risk, as compared to ‘tactical’ investment decisions which involve a
relatively small amount of funds that do not result in a major departure from the past practices of
the firm.
Capital budgeting decisions are vital to any organisation as they include the decisions as to:
(a) Whether or not funds should be invested in long term projects such as setting of an industry,
purchase of plant and machinery etc.
(b) Analyze the proposal for expansion or creating additional capacities.
(c) To decide the replacement of permanent assets such as building and equipment’s.
(d) To make financial analysis of various proposals regarding capital investments so as to choose
the best out of many alternative proposals.
The importance of capital budgeting can be well understood from the fact that an unsound
investment decision may prove to be fatal to the very existence of the concern.
The need, significance or importance of capital budgeting arises mainly due to the
following:
Capital budgeting decisions, generally, involve large investment of funds. But the funds
available with the firm are always limited and the demand for funds far exceeds the resources.
Hence, it is very important for a firm to plan and control its capital expenditure.
Capital expenditure involves not only large amount of funds but also funds for long-term or more
or less on permanent basis. The long-term commitment of funds increases the financial risk
involved in the investment decision. Greater the risk involved, greater is the need for careful
planning of capital expenditure, i.e. Capital budgeting.
The capital expenditure decisions are of irreversible nature. Once the decision for acquiring a
permanent asset is taken, it becomes very difficult to dispose of these assets without incurring
heavy losses.
Capital budgeting decisions have a long-term and significant effect on the profitability of a
concern. Not only the present earnings of the firm are affected by the investments in capital
assets but also the future growth and profitability of the firm depends upon the investment
decision taken today. An unwise decision may prove disastrous and fatal to the very existence of
the concern. Capital budgeting is of utmost importance to avoid over investment or under
investment in fixed assets.
(5) Difficulties of Investment Decisions:
(i) Decision extends to a series of years beyond the current accounting period,
(1) All the techniques of capital budgeting presume that various investment proposals under
consideration are mutually exclusive which may not practically be true in some particular
circumstances.
(2) The techniques of capital budgeting require estimation of future cash inflows and outflows.
The future is always uncertain and the data collected for future may not be exact. Obliviously the
results based upon wrong data may not be good.
(3) There are certain factors like morale of the employees, goodwill of the firm, etc., which
cannot be correctly quantified but which otherwise substantially influence the capital decision.
(5) Uncertainty and risk pose the biggest limitation to the techniques of capital budgeting.
METHODS OF CAPITAL BUDGETING OF EVALUATION
By matching the available resources and projects it can be invested. The funds available are
always living funds. There are many considerations taken for investment decision process such
as environment and economic conditions.
The methods of evaluations are classified as follows:
(A) Traditional methods (or Non-discount methods)
(i) Pay-back Period Methods
(ii) Post Pay-back Methods
(iii) Accounts Rate of Return
(B) Modern methods (or Discount methods)
(i) Net Present Value Method
(ii) Internal Rate of Return Method
(iii) Profitability Index Method
Pay-back Period
Pay-back period is the time required to recover the initial investment in a project
Exercise 1
Project cost is Rs. 30,000 and the cash inflows are Rs. 10,000, the life of the project is
5 years. Calculate the pay-back period.
Exercise 2
A project costs Rs. 20,00,000 and yields annually a profit of Rs. 3,00,000 after
depreciation @ 12½% but before tax at 50%. Calculate the pay-back period.
Uneven Cash Inflows
Normally the projects are not having uniform cash inflows. In those cases the pay-back period is
calculated, cumulative cash inflows will be calculated and then interpreted.
Exercise 3
Certain projects require an initial cash outflow of Rs. 25,000. The cash inflows for 6 years are
Rs. 5,000, Rs. 8,000, Rs. 10,000, Rs. 12,000, Rs. 7,000 and Rs. 3,000.
Solution
Accounting Rate of Return or Average Rate of Return
Average rate of return means the average rate of return or profit taken for
considering the project evaluation. This method is one of the traditional methods for
evaluating the project proposals:
Merits
1. It is easy to calculate and simple to understand.
2. It is based on the accounting information rather than cash inflow.
3. It is not based on the time value of money.
4. It considers the total benefits associated with the project.
Demerits
1. It ignores the time value of money.
2. It ignores the reinvestment potential of a project.
3. Different methods are used for accounting profit. So, it leads to some
difficulties in the calculation of the project.
Accept/Reject criteria
If the actual accounting rate of return is more than the predetermined required rate of
return, the project would be accepted. If not it would be rejected.
Exercise 5
A company has two alternative proposals. The details are as follows
Net Present Value
Net present value method is one of the modern methods for evaluating the project proposals. In
this method cash inflows are considered with the time value of the money. Net present value
describes as the summation of the present value of cash inflow and present value of cash
outflow. Net present value is the difference between the total present value of future cash inflows
and the total present value of future cash outflows.
Merits
1. It recognizes the time value of money.
2. It considers the total benefits arising out of the proposal.
3. It is the best method for the selection of mutually exclusive projects.
4. It helps to achieve the maximization of shareholders’ wealth.
Demerits
1. It is difficult to understand and calculate.
2. It needs the discount factors for calculation of present values.
3. It is not suitable for the projects having different effective lives.
Accept/Reject criteria
If the present value of cash inflows is more than the present value of cash outflows, it would be
accepted. If not, it would be rejected.
Exercise 6
From the following information, calculate the net present value of the two project and suggest
which of the two projects should be accepted a discount rate of the two.
Internal Rate of Return
Internal rate of return is time adjusted technique and covers the disadvantages of the traditional
techniques. In other words it is a rate at which discount cash flows to zero. It is expected by the
following ratio: Cash inflow Investment