Module - 2
Module - 2
The Indian constitution is the lengthiest and the most detailed of all the
written constitutions of the world.
Fundamental rights are the basic rights which are very essential for the
development of one’s personality in a free society. We find a list of
fundamental rights in part-III of our constitution. This is one of the unique
features of our constitution.
Rights and duties are co-relative. A citizen who enjoys various fundamental
rights must also be willing to perform his part of the duties towards the
state and the society. At present 11 fundamental duties.
The Indian constitution guarantees to every citizen of this country, who has
attained the age of 18 yrs. Universal adult franchise shows that India is a
Democratic country.
7. Single citizenship:
In India, the citizens are given single citizenship- The citizens of India, There
is no separate citizenship of the states.
8. Republic:
It upholds a form of government which is- of the people, by the people and
for the people have the right to elect their own rulers.
10. Secularism:
Under the democratic system, all citizens are equal before the law. There
cannot be different sets of laws for the different groups of people. The
judiciary is expected to provide justice to all sections of the society.
Therefore, the Judiciary is given adequate powers.
12.Equal Rights to Women:
Here, both men and women have been given equal rights. The exploitation of
women is considered an offence. Both get equal pay for equal work.
13.Eradication of Untouchability:
The Constitution of India begins with a Preamble which specifies the nature
of the Indian State as well as the objectives it is committed to secure.
Preamble starts with “We the people of India, having solemnly resolved to
constitute India into a sovereign, secular, democratic republic and to secure
to all its citizens justice, liberty, equality and fraternity”.
8.Liberty
Liberty includes, Liberty of speech thought, expression, belief, faith
and worship. But at the same time constitution has restricted these
liberties in the interest of public order, morality and integrity of India.
9.Equality
Equality of Status:- It signifies, the status of free individuals in society
having opportunity grow and develop which is provided by prohibition
of artificial restriction on the ground of religion, race, gender, color,
place of birth.
Equality of opportunity:- It guaranteed by the Rule of Law, signifying
equality before law and equal opportunity of law and non-
discrimination in matters of public employment.
The country which gives importance for fundamental rights are India,
Japan, USA, USSR France, and many other countries.
Apart from Article 12 & 13 of the same part deals with the definition of state
and law respectively article 33 & 35 deals with general provision relating to
fundamental rights.
Exceptions:
The state shall not discriminate against any citizens on grounds on religion,
race, caste and place of birth.
State make provision for reservation seats for sc’s and st and other
backward classes according to 77th Amendment act in the year 1995.
(Art 19)
Article 19 of the constitution guarantees six (Originally seven)
fundamental freedoms to the citizens
It states : All citizens shall have the right to:
19.1(a) Freedom of speech and expression
19.1(b) Freedom of assembly
19.1(c) Freedom to form associations
19.1(d) Freedom of movement
19.1(e) Freedom to reside and settle
19.1(f) Deleted
19.1(g) Freedom of profession, occupation, trade or business.
All the citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and
expression. But this right is subject to limitations/restrictions on
the following grounds:
But the school authority absorbs this and removed the students
from the school. The 3students challenged before the high court of
Kerala.
The high court gave judgement that it is duty of all the citizens to
sing a national anthem song. The three students failed to discharge
their fundamental duty imposed by the constitution by
disrespecting and dishonoring the national anthem.
The Supreme Court has viewed that calling for and holding of
Bundh is unconstitutional and violates the freedom guaranteed
under Art.19 of the constitution.
“No person shall take our life or personal liberty except according
to the procedure established by law.
A personal life can take as per law which is fair and reasonable if
they committed crime or unlawful.
Examples:- TADA terrorism and disruptive activities Act 1987, POTO etc.
Sanjay dutt was arrested under TADA Act.
A person detention is only for three months and it can be extended only with
the permission of the Advisory board.
Below the age of 14 years of children were not allowed to work in any factory
mines or dangerous employment. This provision is certainly in the interest
of public health and safety of life of children.
Despite laws protecting children, we can see many children working freely
and openly everywhere around us. Major industries which employ children
in thousands are in
1. Diamond Polishing
2. Glass Industry
3. Crackers industry
4. Carpet industry
5. Lock making industry etc.
A secular state which has no religion of its own or in other words, which
neither gives preference to any religion nor makes any discrimination
against any religion and remains indifferent towards any particular religion.
Article 25 guarantees every person freedom of religion, customs, faith,
belief etc.
All the Fundamental rights would have become meaningless and ineffective
without any machinery for the enforcement of rights. Here article 32 seeks
to provide the necessary constitutional remedies to achieve the same
according to Dr. B.R Ambedkar
“It is the very soul of the constitution and the very heart of it”. In cases of
violation of any fundamental rights, citizen can seek remedy in SC or HC.
SC is known as ‘protector and guarantee of fundament rights.
Locus standi (Who can apply) The accepted principle is that the affected
person has to file a case or suit in the court of law, not his/her friends,
relatives or any other person has right to file a case.
Eg. If my gold was robbed, I have to file a case, not my friends or relatives.
Exceptions:
1. Habeas Corpus- not only the person detained but any other person can
seek the benefit of Art 32.
2. Public interest litigation (PIL) any interested person can seek the benefit
of Article 32.
1. Habeas Corpus
The word habeas corpus is a Latin term, which means “you may have
his body”. This is a writ by which a person who has been illegally
detained or imprisoned is ordered by the court to be brought and
produced before it and in case his arrest or detention is found to be
illegal or wrongful, the court orders his release.
2. Mandamus
The word Mandamus means a command or an order. By this order,
there is a direction to a public authority, officer, court or government
or any executive authority to do the act or not to do the act. This writ
is available only against public authority and not against private
individuals.
Eg. If a Licensing officer fails to give a license to an applicant in spite
of fulfillment of all the requirements for a license, the court can order
him to issue the license.
Case: Maneka Gandhi v/s Union of India
In 1977, Maneka Gandhi was not allowed to travel abroad and her
passport was cancelled by the passport officer, under instructing from
Smt. Indira Gandhi
3. Prohibition
Superior court issues this writ to a lower court to prevent it from
going beyond the powers conferred on it. It is a direction not exceeds
the limits. The object of this writ is to prevent a lower court from going
beyond the powers conferred upon it by law.
4. Quo-warranto
The term Quo-warranto literally means, “What is your authority”?
The object of this writ is to prevent a person from occupying a public
office who has no proper authority. If a person has occupied any office
to which he has no right, then the court questions such a person to
show under what authority he has occupied that office.
5. Certiorari
This is a writ issued by the superior court(Supreme court and high
courts) to an inferior court or tribunal to remove a suit pending before
it and decide about the validity of such proceedings. If there is already
an order and the trial is completed, then this writ may be issued to
quash such orders.