PASP Reflection 2
PASP Reflection 2
PASP Reflection 2
Personal Perspective
How does crisis/disruption contribute to your understanding/assessment of yourself as a leader.
Disruptive Change is an unavoidable circumstance in a leader’s journey. Adaptation to
major transformation are innovative tools to develop one’s leadership skills. As Heifetz and
Linsky’s (2017) enumerates in their four ideas to enact change, a leader must first, create a
holding environment for the work; second, control the temperature; third, set the pace; and
fourth, show them the future. (Heifetz & Linsky, 2017) Such ideology could either strengthen the
organizational culture yet it could also lead to the breakdown of the group due to risk factors. As
the description entails, it is “disruptive” but it also opens into another reality of growth and
development to adapt to the new demands of the times.
I being a youth leader experienced disruptive changes less on organizational structures
but more on membership deviations and circumstances. Hence, I affirm that “with a positive
mindset and willingness to adapt, any leader can turn disruptive change into an opportunity for
growth and success. (Walk Me Team, 2023)” Though disruptive change is troublesome, in a
way, it leads me, as a youth leader, to further my leadership skills to initiate a paradigm shift to
the group/organization.
As experienced, the youth doesn’t focus much on the concept of disruptive change but
they pay attention more on the technique on which the leader executes the paradigm
shift/change.
Academic Perspective
How does crisis/disruption enhance the general or specific understanding/perception of
leadership?
Disruptive change is parallel with Thomas Kuhn’s Paradigm Shift, “Science does not
progress in a linear and consistent fashion via an accumulation of knowledge, but proceeds
within a scientific paradigm – a set of fundamental theoretical assumptions that guides the
direction of inquiry, determines the standard of truth and defines a scientific discipline at any
particular period of time.” (Bird, 2018) (Oxford University Press , 2019) Analogous with
scientific revolution, Leadership is a cycle which when intercepted with disruptive change or
revolution generates a new paradigm until it creates a new culture of understanding.
The concept of disruptive change relative to leadership highlights how leadership became
a continuous cycle of innovations. Leadership would be a safe undertaking if your organizations
and communities only faced problems for which they already knew the solutions. (Heifetz &
Linsky, 2017) Leadership revolutions, or “danger” as specified by the authors, triggers adaptive
change to stimulates resistance because it challenges people’s habits, beliefs, and values. Since
these dangers penetrates a cycle, resistance would be the first reaction for it goes against the
flow. Hence it follows the complex skills which a leader must possess, the adaptability to
penetrate a paradigm shift to the group culture. Leadership, then, requires not only reverence for
the pains of change and recognition of the manifestations of danger, but also the skill to respond.
(Heifetz & Linsky, 2017)
System Perspective
How does crisis/disruption contribute to relevant changes in leadership practices?
Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher, has been quoted as saying “change is the only constant
in life.” Indeed, change is inevitable and is part of the life experience. (Domaleski, 2023) Thus,
the change’s inevitability to life is directly equivalent to leadership practices. Disruptive changes
are vital factors on the relevant development of leadership practices. For, these challenges
initiate experiential leadership skill. It includes in particular that change must be well managed,
as it also requires effective leadership to be successfully introduced and sustained. (Gill, 2002)
The leadership cycle is empowered when disruptive changes are overcome by the group.
Its systematic implications are centered on the flexibility of the leader to orchestrate change. The
leadership strategies imposed by Heifetz and Linsky’s (2017) suggests to build structures of
relationships to work the tough issues, establishing norms that make passionate disagreement
permissible but keeping the hands on the temperature controls. Hence, not provoking people too
much at any one time for the goal is to orchestrate the conflict, not become it. (Heifetz & Linsky,
2017)
REFERENCES
Bird, A. (2018, March 21). Thomas Kuhn. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/#ConcPara
Domaleski, J. (2023, January 10). The inevitability of change. Retrieved from The Citizen:
https://thecitizen.com/2023/01/10/the-inevitability-of-change/
Gill, R. (2002). Change management--or change leadership? Journal of Change Management,
307-318.
Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2017). Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive through the Dangers of
Change. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
Oxford University Press . (2019, November 14). Thomas Kuhn and the paradigm shift –
Philosopher of the Month. Retrieved from OUPblog:
https://blog.oup.com/2019/11/thomas-kuhn-paradigm-shift-philosopher-of-the-month/
Walk Me Team. (2023, April 06). Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Retrieved from
Walk Me The Change Management Blog: https://change.walkme.com/disruptive-change/