He 2001
He 2001
He 2001
the composters. c After readdition of food waste, aeration rate was increased correspondingly.
2348 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 35, NO. 11, 2001
FIGURE 4. Ammonia volatilization from composters aerated at
FIGURE 2. Profiles of N2O concentration in the exhaust gas versus
different rates.
composting time.
VOL. 35, NO. 11, 2001 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 2349
FIGURE 7. Correlation between N2O concentration in offgas and
NO2- content in waste mixture.
2350 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 35, NO. 11, 2001
In contrast to the results obtained previously in manure Acknowledgments
land application (19-21) and composting systems (22), no The research was financially supported by Environmental
significant correlation was found between N2O production Agency, Japan. We are grateful to Dr. Toshihiro Sankai and
and ammonia, nitrate and total nitrogen. Aeration enabled Ms. Keiko Kuto for their generous provision of equipment
the system to be predominantly an oxic environment, and for food waste preparation, and Ms. Hideko Arai and Ms.
reduction of nitrate was poor though anoxic/anaerobic Midori Toyama for their help on N, P analysis. Also, we wish
microsites might exist in large waste particles. As a result of to express our appreciation for the assistance of Dr. Nicholas
this, NO3- concentration as high as 3.53 mg‚g-1 detected in McClure and Mr. Brett Roman in manuscript revisions.
CCM-amended treatments at the end of composting did not
cause apparent change in N2O generation. Poor NH4+-N2O Literature Cited
correlation was possibly a consequence of the extensive
(1) Crutzen, P. J. J. Geophys. Res. 1971, 76, 7311-7327.
period needed for ammonia oxidation. (2) Crutzen, P. J. Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 1970, 96, 320-325.
High N2O production occurred after the readily available (3) Wang, W. C.; Yung, Y. L.; Lacis, A. A.; Mo, T.; Hansen, J. E. Science
carbon source was depleted. In intermittent-feeding com- 1976, 194, 685-690.
posters, occurrence of the main N2O-production peaks was (4) Khalil, M. A. K.; Rasmussen, R. A. J. Geophys. Res. 1992, 97,
postponed from days 36 to 70. It’s unlikely the increased 14651-14660.
(5) De Soete, G. in Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop
waste amount, which was expected to prolong DOC removal
on Nitrous Oxide Emissions; Cologne, Germany, April 21-23,
process, postponed N2O generation. With enough bulking 1997; pp IX-XIII.
agent, applying large amount of food waste did not prolong (6) Czepiel, P.; Douglas, E.; Harriss, R.; Crill, P. Environ, Sci, Technol.
DOC removal process, as evidenced by the similar DOC 1996, 30 (8), 2519-2525.
accumulation-consumption patterns observed after read- (7) Tsujimoto, Y.; Masuda, J.; Fukuya, J.; Ito, H. J. Air Waste Manage.
dition of different amount of waste in our study. Multiple Assoc. 1994, 44, 1313-1314.
(8) Zheng, H.; Hanaki, K.; Matsuo, T. Wat. Sci. Technol. 1994, 30
feedings of fresh waste supported a continuous DOC (6), 134-141.
production-consumption process and inhibited ammonia (9) Mizuochi, M.; Inamori, Y.; Sato, K. Japanese J. Water Treat. Biol.
oxidation, and hence N2O production was postponed. 1993 (Suppl.), 86-87.
In single-charged composters, a two-peak N2O emission (10) Hanaki, K.; Wantawin, C.; Gujer, W. Water Res. 1990, 24, 289-
curve was obtained after 5 months. The first peak observed 296.
(11) Boltze, U.; de Freitas, M. H. Waste Manage. Res. 1997, 15, 463-
immediately after feeding of fresh waste came from the
476.
release of N2O stored in food waste. Within 6 h, 200 g of food (12) Kjeldsen, P.; Fischer, E. V. Waste Manage. Res. 1995, 13, 467-
waste stored in refrigerator produced 0.75 µL of N2O according 484.
to our investigation. N2O was then sealed in the clump after (13) Liu, A. H.; Kunz, C. O. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 15 (4), 436-
being frozen and released after thawing. 440.
The first N2O emission peak in treatments with CCM was (14) Toms, P.; Leskiw, J.; Hettiaratchi, P. in Presentation at the 88th
Annual Meeting & Exhibition; San Antonio, TX, June 18-23,
higher than that without CCM, as a result of N2O generation 1995; pp 18-23.
from the mature compost which was a known N2O generator- (15) Schulthess, R. V.; Kuhni, M.; Gujer, W. Water Res. 1995, 29,
(22-24). There is no direct evidence that CCM addition 215-226.
imported new N2O generation mechanisms based on the (16) Schulthess, R. V.; Wild, D.; Gujer, W. Water Sci. Technol. 1994,
presently available data, but this study clearly showed that 30, 123-132.
(17) Wild, D.; Schulthess, R. V.; Gujer, W. Water Sci. Technol. 1994,
addition of CCM resulted in an earlier occurrence of N2O.
30, 113-122.
In all experiments, a high N2O emission peak was found (18) Wild, D.; Schulthess, R. V.; Gujer, W. Water Sci. Technol. 1995,
at the end of the composting process (Figures 2 and 3). 31, 45-54.
Considering the good NO2--N2O correlation during this (19) Cates, R. L., Jr.; Keeney, D. R. J. Environ. Qual. 1987, 16 (4),
period and the immediate increase in N2O production after 443-447.
NO2- addition, N2O might be produced from NO2-. Usually (20) Boustany, R. G.; Crozier, C. R.; Rybczyk, J. M.; Twilley, R. R.
Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 1997, 4, 273-283.
this transformation step occurs under anoxic or anaerobic (21) Burford, J. R.; Bremner, J. M. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1975, 7, 389-
conditions (25, 26); however, aerobic denitrification has been 394.
frequently documented in recent years (27, 28). With the (22) Mahimairaja, S.; Bolan, N. S.; Hedley, M. J. Soil Biol. Biochem.
high aeration rates employed in the study, our composting 1995, 27 (9), 1223-1225.
system was kept predominantly aerobic throughout the (23) Haus, R.; Käding, H.; Leipnitz, W.; Bautzer, W. SPIE 1995, 2506,
748-755.
experiment; however, anoxic or anaerobic microsites might
(24) Kuroda, K.; Osada, T.; Yonaga, M.; Kanematu, A.; Nitta, T.; Mouri,
still exist inside the waste particles similarly to the coexistence S.; Kojima, T. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 56, 265-271.
of aerobic and anaerobic microenvironment in aerobic soils (25) Flessa, H.; Beese, F. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1995, 59 (4), 1044-1051.
(29, 30), denitrification conducted by denitrifiers in these (26) Bremner, J. M. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 1997, 49 (1-3), 7-16.
microsites might contribute to NO2- reduction. If this is the (27) Robertson, L. A.; Kuenen, J. G. in Microbial Control of Pollution;
case, N2O production should be proportional to the available Fry, J. C., Gadd, G. M., Herbert, R. A., Jones, C. W., and Watson-
Craik, I. A.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1992.
carbon as shown previously (21, 31) because denitrifiers are (28) Zhao, H. W.; Mavinic, D. S.; Oldham, W. K.; Koch, F. A. Water
mostly heterotrophs. However, most of the N2O was produced Res. 1999, 33 (4), 961-970.
after the depletion of available organic carbon in our study, (29) Goodroad, L. L.; Keeney, D. R. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1984, 16 (1),
a result inconsistent with the active metabolism of denitrifiers. 39-43.
Considering the sequential appearance of NH4+, NO2-, and (30) Parkin, T. B. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1987, 51, 1194-1199.
NO3- peaks, which proved the existence of nitrifiers, nitrifier (31) Cabrera, M.; Chiang, S.; Merka, W.; Pancorbo, O.; Thompson,
S. Plant Soil 1994, 163, 189-196.
denitrification appeared to be the predominant mechanism
for N2O production in our system. ES0011616
VOL. 35, NO. 11, 2001 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 2351