M&A
M&A
M&A
Exchange of equity shares for acquisition is based on current market value as above. There is no
synergy advantage available.
(i) Find the earning per share for company MK Ltd. after merger, and
(ii) Find the exchange ratio so that shareholders of NN Ltd. would not be at a loss.
Solution
Therefore, Total number of shares of MK Ltd. and NN Ltd.=12,00,000 (MK Ltd.) + 2,40,000 (NN
Ltd.) = 14,40,000 Shares
(ii) To find the exchange ratio so that shareholders of NN Ltd. would not be at a Loss:
Present earning per share for company MK Ltd. = ₹ 60,00,000 / 12,00,000 = ₹ 5.00
Present earning per share for company NN Ltd. = ₹ 18,00,000 / 3,00,000 = ₹ 6.00
Therefore, Exchange ratio should be 6 shares of MK Ltd. for every 5 shares of NN Ltd.
Now, total No. of shares of MK Ltd. and NN Ltd. =12,00,000 (MK Ltd.) + 3,60,000 (NN Ltd.) =
15,60,000 shares
Total earnings available to shareholders of NN Ltd. after merger = 3,60,000 shares x ₹ 5.00 =
₹ 18,00,000.
Exchange of equity shares for acquisition is based on current market value as above. There is no
synergy advantage available:
(i) Find the earning per share for company K. Ltd. after merger.
(ii) Find the exchange ratio so that shareholders of N. Ltd. would not be at a loss.
Solution
(ii) To find the Exchange Ratio so that shareholders of N. Ltd. would not be at a Loss:
Therefore, Exchange Ratio should be 6 shares of K. Ltd. for every 5 shares of N Ltd.
, ,
Therefore, E.P.S. After Merger = = ₹ 5.00 Per share
, ,
(i) If the merger goes through by exchange of equity and the exchange ratio is based on the
current market price, what is the new earning per share for M Co. Ltd.?
(ii) N Co. Ltd. wants to be sure that the earnings available to its shareholders will not be
diminished by the merger. What should be the exchange ratio in that case?
Solution
(ii) Calculation of exchange ratio which would not diminish the EPS of N Co. Ltd. after its merger
with M Co. Ltd.
Current EPS:
₹ , ,
M Co. Ltd. = = ₹5
, ,
₹ , ,
N Co. Ltd. = = ₹6
, ,
= 4,80,000 × ₹ 5 = ₹ 24,00,000
Recommendation: The exchange ratio (6 for 5) based on market shares is beneficial to shareholders
of 'N' Co. Ltd.
Required:
(i) The number of equity shares to be issued by A Ltd. for acquisition of T Ltd.
(ii) What is the EPS of A Ltd. after the acquisition?
(iii) Determine the equivalent earnings per share of T Ltd.
(iv) What is the expected market price per share of A Ltd. after the acquisition, assuming its
PE multiple remains unchanged?
(v) Determine the market value of the merged firm.
Solution
(i) The number of shares to be issued by A Ltd.:
The Exchange ratio is 0.5
So, new Shares = 1,80,000 x 0.5 = 90,000 shares.
Required:
(i) What is the present EPS of both the companies?
(ii) If the proposed merger takes place, what would be the new earning per share for ABC Ltd.?
Assume that the merger takes place by exchange of equity shares and the exchange ratio is
based on the current market price.
(iii) What should be exchange ratio, if XYZ Ltd. wants to ensure the earnings to members are
same as before the merger takes place?
Solution
(i) Earnings per share = Earnings after tax / No. of equity shares
(ii) Number of Shares XYZ Limited’s shareholders will get in ABC Ltd. based on market value per
share = ₹ 28 / 42 x 6,00,000 = 4,00,000 shares
Total number of equity shares of ABC Ltd. after merger = 10,00,000 + 4,00,000 = 14,00,000
shares
(iii) Calculation of exchange ratio to ensure shareholders of XYZ Ltd. to earn the same as was before
merger:
Total earnings in ABC Ltd. available to shareholders of XYZ Ltd. = 3,60,000 x ₹ 5 = ₹ 18,00,000.
Thus, to ensure that Earning to members are same as before, the ratio of exchange should be
0.6 share for 1 share.
Solution
(i) Pre - merger EPS and P / E ratios of XYZ Ltd. and ABC Ltd.
Particulars XYZ Ltd. ABC Ltd.
Earnings after taxes 5,00,000 1,25,000
Number of shares outstanding 2,50,000 1,25,000
EPS 2 1
Market Price per share 20 10
P / E Ratio (times) 10 10
(ii) Current Market Price of ABC Ltd. if P/E ratio is 6.4 = ₹ 1 × 6.4 = ₹ 6.40
₹ ₹ .
Exchange ratio = = 3.125 or = 0.32
₹ . ₹
Solution
(i)
a) Calculation of EPS when exchange ratio is in proportion to relative EPS of two companies
Company X 3,00,000
Company Y 2,00,000 x 2.25 / 4 1,12,500
Total number of shares after merger 4,12,500
Company X
EPS before merger = ₹4
EPS after merger = ₹ 16,50,000 / 4,12,500 shares = ₹4
Company Y
EPS before merger = ₹ 2.25
Total number of shares after merger = 3,00,000 + (2,00,000 x 0.5) = 4,00,000 shares
Required:
(i) What is the Swap Ratio based on current market prices?
(ii) What is the EPS of Mark Limited after acquisition?
(iii) What is the expected market price per share of Mark Limited after acquisition, assuming
P/E ratio of Mark Limited remains unchanged?
(iv) Determine the market value of the merged firm.
(v) Calculate gain / loss for shareholders of the two independent companies after acquisition.
Solution
Particulars Mark Ltd. Mask Ltd.
= ₹ 10.91 x 10 = ₹ 109.10
The merger is expected to generate gains, which have a present value of ₹ 200 lakhs. The exchange
ratio agreed to is 0.5.
What is the true cost of the merger from the point of view of Elrond Limited?
Solution
Shareholders of Doom Ltd. will get 5 lakh share of Elrond Limited, so they will get:
What is the maximum exchange ratio which the CEO should offer so that he could keep EPS at the
current level, given that the current market price of both the acquirer and the target company are
₹ 42 and ₹ 105 respectively?
If the CEO borrows funds at 15% and buys out Target Company by paying cash, how much cash
should he offer to maintain his EPS? Assume tax rate of 30%.
Solution
(i)
Acquirer Company Target Company
Net Profit ₹ 80 lakhs ₹ 15.75 lakhs
PE Multiple 10.50 10.00
Market Capitalization ₹ 840 lakhs ₹ 157.50 lakhs
Market Price ₹ 42 ₹ 105
No. of Shares 20 lakhs 1.50 lakhs
EPS ₹4 ₹ 10.50
Thus, for every one share of Target Company 2.625 shares of Acquirer Company.
(ii) Let x lakhs be the amount paid by Acquirer company to Target Company. Then to maintain same
EPS i.e. ₹ 4 the number of shares to be issued will be:
x = ₹ 150 lakhs
Thus, ₹ 150 lakhs shall be offered in cash to Target Company to maintain same EPS.
Solution
Working Notes
a)
XYZ Ltd. ABC Ltd.
Equity shares outstanding (Nos.) 10,00,000 4,00,000
EPS ₹ 40 ₹ 28
Profit ₹ 400,00,000 ₹ 112,00,000
PE Ratio 6.25 5.71
Market price per share ₹ 250 ₹ 160
* ₹ 40 x 0.70
(iii) Gain / loss from the Merger to the shareholders of XYZ Ltd.
Thus maximum ratio of issue shall be 2.80 : 4.00 or 0.70 share of XYZ Ltd. for one share of
ABC Ltd.
Calculate Ratio/s up to four decimal points and amounts and number of shares up to two decimal
points.
Solution
(i) Pre – Merger Market Value of Per Share
P/E Ratio x EPS
Longitude Ltd. ₹ 8 X 15 = ₹ 120.00
Latitude Ltd. ₹ 5 X 10 = ₹ 50.00
1)
Pre - Merger PAT of Longitude Ltd. ₹ 120 Lakhs
Pre - Merger PAT of Latitude Ltd. ₹ 80 Lakhs
Combined PAT ₹ 200 Lakhs
Longitude Ltd. ’s EPS ₹8
Maximum number of shares of Longitude after merger (₹ 200 lakhs / 25 Lakhs
₹ 8)
Existing number of shares 15 Lakhs
Maximum number of shares to be exchanged 10 Lakhs
Required:
Solution
After Merger
P Ltd. R Ltd.
No. of Shares 25 crores 15 ×
4
= 12 crores
5
Combined 37 crores
% of Combined Equity Owned 25
× 100 = 67.57%
12
× 100 = 32.43%
37 37
P/E Ratio = 12
P Ltd.
R Ltd.
4
6.47 × = ₹ 5.18
5
Gain / loss (-) per share = ₹ 5.18 – ₹ 5.67 = (- ₹ 0.49)
. .
i.e., × 100 (−) 0.0864 or (−) 8.64%
.
Required:
(i) Calculate the EPS after merger under both the alternatives.
(ii) Show the impact on EPS for the shareholders of the two companies under both the
alternatives
Solution
, ,
EPS for Cauliflower Ltd. after merger = = ₹ 5.00
, ,
Impact on EPS
₹
Cauliflower Ltd. shareholders
EPS before merger 5.00
EPS after merger 5.00
Increase/ Decrease in EPS 0.00
Cabbage Ltd.' Shareholders
EPS before merger 3.00
EPS after the merger 5.00 x 3 / 5 3.00
Increase / Decrease in EPS 0.00
Impact on EPS
₹
Cauliflower Ltd. shareholders
EPS before merger 5.00
EPS after merger 5.23
Increase in EPS 0.23
Cabbage Ltd. shareholders
EPS before merger 3.000
EPS after the merger 5.23 x 0.5 2.615
Decrease in EPS 0.385
Calculate the change in earnings per share of B Ltd. if it acquires the whole of C Ltd. by issuing
shares at its market price of ₹ 12. Assume the price of B Ltd. shares remains constant.
Solution
PE ratio (given) = 10
= ₹ 1,50,000
PE ratio (given) = 17
= ₹ 3,52,941
₹ 15,00,000 ÷ 12 = 1,25,000
So the EPS affirm B will increase from ₹ 0.71 to ₹ 0.80 as a result of merger.
Calculate the range of valuation that ABC has to consider. (PV factors at 12% for years 1 to 3
respectively: 0.893, 0.797 and 0.712).
Solution
(₹ 250 cr x 0.893) + (₹ 300 cr. x 0.797) + (₹ 400 cr. x 0.712) ₹ 747.15 Cr.
Value of per share (₹ 747.15 Cr. / 1.5 Cr) ₹ 498.10 per share
Range of Valuation
Per Share ₹ Total ₹ Cr.
Minimum 400.00 600.00
Maximum 498.10 747.15
(₹ Lakhs)
Profit before tax 110
.
Sales 70
Less: Material costs 20
Labour costs 12
Fixed costs 10 (42) 28
140.00
Less: Taxes @ 30% 42.00
Future Maintainable Profit after taxes 98.00
Relevant Capitalisation Factor 0.14
Value of Business (₹ 98 / 0.14) 700
PE ratio 10
Market price per share ₹ 17
The current debt of Dimple Ltd. is ₹ 65 lacs and of Simple Ltd. is ₹ 460 lacs.
Solution
Compute Value of Equity
Simple Ltd.
₹ in Lacs
High Growth Medium Growth Slow Growth
Debit + Equity 820 550 410
Less: Debt 460 460 460
Equity 360 90 -50
Since the Company has limited liability the value of equity cannot be negative therefore the value of
equity under slow growth will be taken as zero because of insolvency risk and the value of debt is taken
at 410 lacs. The expected value of debt and equity can then be calculated as:
Simple Ltd.
₹ in Lacs
High Growth Medium Growth Slow Growth Expected Value
Prob. Value Prob. Value Prob. Value
Debt 0.20 460 0.60 460 0.20 410 450
Equity 0.20 360 0.60 90 0.20 0 126
820 550 410 576
Dimple Ltd.
₹ in Lacs
High Growth Medium Growth Slow Growth Expected Value
Prob. Value Prob. Value Prob. Value
Equity 0.20 985 0.60 760 0.20 525 758
Debt 0.20 65 0.60 65 0.20 65 65
1050 825 590 823
Expected Values
₹ in Lacs
Equity Debt
Simple Ltd. 126 Simple Ltd. 450
Dimple Ltd. 758 Dimple Ltd. 65
884 515
Earnings would have witnessed 5% constant growth rate without merger and 6% with merger on
account of economies of operations after 5 years in each case. The cost of capital is 15%.
The number of shares outstanding in both the companies before the merger is the same and the
companies agree to an exchange ratio of 0.5 shares of Yes Ltd. for each share of No Ltd.
PV factor at 15% for years 1 - 5 are 0.870, 0.756; 0.658, 0.572, 0.497 respectively.
Solution
Company Rama Ltd. is acquiring the company Krishna Ltd., exchanging its shares on a one – to – one
basis for company Krishna Ltd. The exchange ratio is based on the market prices of the shares of
the two companies.
Required:
(i) What will be the EPS subsequent to merger?
(ii) What is the change in EPS for the shareholders of companies Rama Ltd. and Krishna Ltd.?
(iii) Determine the market value of the post – merger firm. PE ratio is likely to remain the same.
(iv) Ascertain the profits accruing to shareholders of both the companies.
Solution
(i)
Exchange Ratio 1:1
New Shares to be issued 2,00,000
Total shares of Rama Ltd. (4,00,000 + 2,00,000) 6,00,000
Total earnings (₹ 10,00,000 + ₹ 7,00,000) ₹ 17,00,000
New EPS (₹ 17,00,000 / 6,00,000) ₹ 2.83
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Rama Ltd. Krishna Ltd Total
No. of shares after merger 4,00,000 2,00,000 6,00,000
Market price ₹ 39.62 ₹ 39.62 ₹ 39.62
Total Mkt. Values ₹ 1,58,48,000 ₹ 79,24,000 ₹ 2,37,72,000
Existing Mkt. values ₹ 1,40,00,000 ₹ 70,00,000 ₹ 2,10,00,000
Gain to share holders ₹ 18,48,000 ₹ 9,24,000 ₹ 27,72,000
or ₹ 27,72,000/ 3 = ₹ 9,24,000 to Krishna Ltd. and ₹ 18,48,000 to Rama Ltd. (in 2 : 1 ratio)
Industry data for “pure-play” firms have been compiled and are summarized as follows:
Business Segment Capitalization / Sales Capitalization / Capitalization / Operating
Assets Income
Wholesale 0.85 0.7 9
Retail 1.2 0.7 8
General 0.8 0.7 4
Solution
Business Segment Capital - to - Sales Segment Sales Theoretical Values
Wholesale 0.85 € 225000 € 191250
Retail 1.2 € 720000 € 864000
General 0.8 € 2500000 € 2000000
Total value € 3055250
Board of Directors of both the Companies have decided to give a fair deal to the shareholders and
accordingly for swap ratio the weights are decided as 40%, 25% and 35% respectively for Earning,
Book Value and Market Price of share of each company:
(i) Calculate the swap ratio and also calculate Promoter’s holding % after acquisition.
(ii) What is the EPS of Efficient Ltd. after acquisition of Healthy Ltd.?
(iii) What is the expected market price per share and market capitalization of Efficient Ltd.
after acquisition, assuming P/E ratio of Firm Efficient Ltd. remains unchanged?
(iv) Calculate free float market capitalization of the merged firm.
Solution
Swap Ratio
Efficient Ltd. Healthy Ltd.
Market capitalization 500 lakhs 750 lakhs
No. of shares 10 lakhs 7.5 lakhs
Market Price per share ₹ 50 ₹ 100
P/E ratio 10 5
EPS ₹5 ₹ 20
Profit ₹ 50 lakh ₹ 150 lakh
Share capital ₹ 100 lakh ₹ 75 lakh
Reserves and surplus ₹ 300 lakh ₹ 165 lakh
Total ₹ 400 lakh ₹ 240 lakh
Book Value per share ₹ 40 ₹ 32
Swap ratio is for every one share of Healthy Ltd., to issue 2.5 shares of Efficient Ltd. Hence,
total no. of shares to be issued 7.5 lakh x 2.5 = 18.75 lakh shares.
Promoter’s holding = 4.75 lakh shares + (5 x 2.5 = 12.5 lakh shares) = 17.25 lakh i.e. Promoter’s
holding % is (17.25 lakh / 28.75 lakh) x 100 = 60%.
Calculation of EPS, Market price, Market capitalization and free float market capitalization.
EPS .
= .
= .
= ₹ 6.956
Janam Ltd., is interested in doing justice to both companies. The following parameters have been
assigned by the Board of Janam Ltd., for determining the swap ratio:
Book value 25%
Earning per share
1.9 50%
Market price 25%
Solution
Swap Ratio
Abhiman Ltd. Swabhiman Ltd.
(₹) (₹)
Share capital 200 lacs 100 lacs
Free reserves & surplus 900 lacs 600 lacs
Total 1100 lacs 700 lacs
No. of shares 2 lacs 10 lacs
Book value for share ₹ 550 ₹ 70
Promoters Holding 50% 60%
Non promoters holding 50% 40%
Free float market capitalization (Public) 500 lacs ₹ 156 lacs
Total Market Cap 1000 lacs 390 lacs
No. of shares 2 lacs 10 lacs
Market Price ₹ 500 ₹ 39
P/E ratio 10 4
EPS ₹ 50.00 ₹ 9.75
(i) SWAP Ratio is 0.148825 shares of Abhiman Ltd. for every share of Swabhiman Ltd.
Total No. of shares to be issued = 10 lakh x 0.148825 = 148825 shares
or = .
= .
= ₹ 516.02
₹ ₹ .
EPS = .
= .
= ₹ 56.62
The Board of Directors of both the companies have decided to give a fair deal to the shareholders.
Accordingly, the weights are decided as 40%, 25% and 35% respectively for earnings (EPS), book
value and market price of share of each company for swap ratio.
Solution
(i)
E Ltd. H Ltd.
Market capitalisation 1000 lakhs 1500 lakhs
No. of shares 20 lakhs 15 lakhs
Market Price per share ₹ 50 ₹ 100
P/E ratio 10 5
EPS ₹5 ₹ 20
Profit ₹ 100 lakh ₹ 300 lakh
Share capital ₹ 200 lakh ₹ 150 lakh
Reserves and surplus ₹ 600 lakh ₹ 330 lakh
Total ₹ 800 lakh ₹ 480 lakh
Book Value per share ₹ 40 ₹ 32
EPS .
= .
= .
= ₹ 6.956
(vi) Free float of market capitalization = ₹ 69.56 per share x (57.50 lakh x 40%) = ₹ 1599.88 lakh
Trident Ltd. is interested to do justice to the shareholders of both the Companies. For the swap
ratio weights are assigned to different parameters by the Board of Directors as follows:
Book Value 25%
EPS (Earning per share) 50%
Market Price 25%
c) Calculate:
(i) Promoter’s revised holding in the Abhiman Ltd.
(ii) Free float market capitalization.
(iii) Also calculate No. of Shares, Earning per Share (EPS) and Book Value (B.V.), if after
acquisition of Abhishek Ltd., Abhiman Ltd. decided to :
1) Issue Bonus shares in the ratio of 1 : 2; and
2) Split the stock (share) as ₹ 5 each fully paid.
Solution
a) Swap Ratio
Abhiman Ltd. Abhishek Ltd.
Share Capital 200 Lakh 100 Lakh
Free Reserves 800 Lakh 500 Lakh
Total 1000 Lakh 600 Lakh
No. of Shares 2 Lakh 10 Lakh
Book Value per share ₹ 500 ₹ 60
Promoter’s holding 50% 60%
Non promoter’s holding 50% 40%
Free Float Market Cap. i.e. 400 Lakh 128 Lakh
Relating to Public’s holding
Hence Total market Cap. 800 Lakh 320 Lakh
No. of Shares 2 Lakh 10 Lakh
Market Price ₹ 400 ₹ 32
P/E Ratio 10 4
EPS 40 8
Profits (₹ 2 X 40 lakh) ₹ 80 lakh -
(₹ 8 X 10 lakh) - ₹ 80 lakh
Swap ratio is for every one share of Abhishek Ltd., to issue 0.15 shares of Abhiman Ltd. Hence
total no. of shares to be issued.
c)
(i) Promoter’s holding
Promoter’s Revised Abhiman 50% i.e. 1.00 Lakh shares
Holding Abhishek 60% i.e. 0.90 Lakh shares
Balance Sheet
Particulars R. Ltd. (₹) S. Ltd (₹)
Equity & Liabilities
Shareholders Fund
Equity Capital (₹ 10 each) 20,00,000 16,00,000
Retained earnings 4,00,000 -
Non - current Liabilities
16% Long term Debt 10,00,000 6,00,000
Current Liabilities 14,00,000 8,00,000
Total 48,00,000 30,00,000
Assets
Non – current Assets 20,00,000 10,00,000
Current Assets 28,00,000 20,00,000
Total 1.11 48,00,000 30,00,000
Income Statement
Particulars R. Ltd. (₹) S. Ltd. (₹)
A. Net Sales 69,00,000 34,00,000
B. Cost of Goods sold 55,20,000 27,20,000
C. Gross Profit (A-B) 13,80,000 6,80,00
D. Operating Expenses 4,00,000 2,00,000
Additional Information:
No. of equity shares 2,00,000 1,60,000
Dividend payment Ratio (D/P) 20% 30%
Market price per share ₹ 50 ₹ 20
Assume that both companies are in the process of negotiating a merger through exchange of Equity
shares:
a) Decompose the share price of both the companies into EPS & P/E components. Also segregate
their EPS figures into Return On Equity (ROE) and Book Value / Intrinsic Value per share
components.
b) Estimate future EPS growth rates for both the companies.
c) Based on expected operating synergies, R Ltd. estimated that the intrinsic value of S Ltd.
Equity share would be ₹ 25 per share on its acquisition. You are required to develop a range
of justifiable Equity Share Exchange ratios that can be offered by R Ltd. to the
shareholders of S Ltd. Based on your analysis on parts (i) and (ii), would you expect the
negotiated terms to be closer to the upper or the lower exchange ratio limits and why?
Solution
a) Determination of EPS, P/E Ratio, ROE and BVPS of R Ltd. & S Ltd.
R Ltd. S Ltd.
EAT (₹) 5,33,000 2,49,600
N 200000 160000
EPS (EAT ÷ N) 2.665 1.56
Market Price Per Share 50 20
PE Ratio (MPS / EPS) 18.76 12.82
Equity Fund (Equity Value) 2400000 1600000
BVPS (Equity Value ÷ N) 12 10
ROE (EAT ÷ EF) or 0.2221 0.156
ROE (EAT ÷ EF) x 100 22.21% 15.60%
Since R Ltd. has higher EPS, PE, ROE and higher growth expectations the negotiated term would be
expected to be closer to the lower limit, based on existing share price.
Balance Sheet
Particulars BA Ltd. (₹) DA Ltd. (₹)
Current Assets 14,00,000 10,00,000
Fixed Assets (Net) 10,00,000 5,00,000
Total (₹) 24,00,000 15,00,000
Equity capital (₹ 10 each) 10,00,000 8,00,000
Retained earnings 2,00,000 --
14% long-term debt 5,00,000 3,00,00
Current liabilities 7,00,000 4,00,000
Total (₹) 24,00,000 15,00,000
Income Statement
BA Ltd. (₹) DA Ltd. (₹)
Net Sales 34,50,000 17,00,000
Cost of Goods sold 27,60,000 13,60,000
Gross profit 6,90,000 3,40,000
Operating expenses 2,00,000 1,00,000
Interest 70,000 42,000
Earnings before taxes 4,20,000 1,98,00
Taxes @ 50% 2,10,000 99,000
Earnings after taxes (EAT) 2,10,000 99,000
Additional Information:
No. of Equity shares 1,00,000 80,000
Dividend payment ratio (D/P) 40% 60%
Market price per share ₹ 40 ₹ 15
Assume that both companies are in the process of negotiating a merger through an exchange of
equity shares. You have been asked to assist in establishing equitable exchange terms and are
required to:
(i) Decompose the share price of both the companies into EPS and P/E components; and also
segregate their EPS figures into Return on Equity (ROE) and book value / intrinsic value per
share components.
(ii) Estimate future EPS growth rates for each company.
(iii) Based on expected operating synergies BA Ltd. estimates that the intrinsic value of DA’s
equity share would be ₹ 20 per share on its acquisition. You are required to develop a range
of justifiable equity share exchange ratios that can be offered by BA Ltd. to the
shareholders of DA Ltd. Based on your analysis in part (i) and (ii), would you expect the
negotiated terms to be closer to the upper, or the lower exchange ratio limits and why?
(iv) Calculate the post – merger EPS based on an exchange ratio of 0.4 : 1 being offered by BA
Ltd. and indicate the immediate EPS accretion or dilution, if any, that will occur for each
group of shareholders.
(v) Based on a 0.4 : 1 exchange ratio and assuming that BA Ltd.’s pre - merger P/E ratio will
continue after the merger, estimate the post - merger market price. Also show the resulting
accretion or dilution in pre - merger market prices.
Solution
Market price per share (MPS) = EPS x P/E ratio or P/E ratio = MPS / EPS
(i) Determination of EPS, P/E ratio, ROE and BVPS of BA Ltd. and DA Ltd.
BA Ltd. DA Ltd.
Earnings After Tax (EAT) ₹ 2,10,000 ₹ 99,000
No. of Shares (N) 100000 80000
EPS (EAT / N) ₹ 2.10 ₹ 1.2375
Market price per share (MPS) 40 15
P/E Ratio (MPS / EPS) 19.05 12.12
Equity Funds (EF) ₹ 12,00,000 ₹ 8,00,000
BVPS (EF / N) 12 10
ROE (EAT / EF) × 100 17.50% 12.37%
Since, BA Ltd. has a higher EPS, ROE, P/E ratio and even higher EPS growth expectations, the
negotiable terms would be expected to be closer to the lower limit, based on the existing share
prices.
(i) Calculate the increase in the total value of BCD Ltd. resulting from the acquisition on the
basis of the following conditions:
Current expected growth rate of BCD Ltd. 7%
Expected growth rate under control of AFC Ltd., (without any 8%
additional capital investment and without any change in risk of
operations)
Current Market price per share of AFC Ltd. ₹ 100
Current Market price per share of BCD Ltd. ₹ 20
Expected Dividend per share of BCD Ltd. ₹ 0.60
(ii) On the basis of aforesaid conditions calculate the gain or loss to shareholders of both the
companies, if AFC Ltd. were to offer one of its shares for every four shares of BCD Ltd.
(iii) Calculate the gain to the shareholders of both the Companies, if AFC Ltd. pays ₹ 22 for each
share of BCD Ltd., assuming the P/E Ratio of AFC Ltd. does not change after the merger.
EPS of AFC Ltd. is ₹ 8 and that of BCD is ₹ 2.50. It is assumed that AFC Ltd. invests its
cash to earn 10%.
Solution
The cost of capital of BCD Ltd. may be calculated by using the following formula:
Dividend
+ Growth %
Price
Cost of Capital i.e., Ke = (0.60 / 20) + 0.07 = 0.10
(ii) To shareholders of BCD Ltd. the immediate gain is ₹ 100 – ₹ 20 x 4 = ₹ 20 per share
The gain can be higher if price of shares of AFC Ltd. rise following merger which they should
undertake.
To AFC Ltd. shareholders (₹ (In lakhs)
Value of Company now 1,000
Value of BCD Ltd. 150
1,150
No. of shares 11.25
Therefore,Value per share 1150 / 11.25 = ₹ 102.22
PE Ratio 12.50
Post – Merger Price of Share (₹ 8.15 x 12.50) ₹ 101.875
Less: Price before merger ₹ 100.00
₹ 1.875
Say ₹ 1.88
Required:
Solution
PE Ratio 10
Therefore, Shareholders will be better – off than before the merger situation.
PQR Ltd. wishes to acquire XYZ Ltd. because of likely synergies. The estimated present value of
these synergies is ₹ 80,00,000.
Further PQR feels that management of XYZ Ltd. has been over paid. With better motivation, lower
salaries and fewer perks for the top management, will lead to savings of ₹ 4,00,000 p.a. Top
management with their families are promoters of XYZ Ltd. Present value of these savings would
add ₹ 30,00,000 in value to the acquisition.
Required:
(i) What is the maximum price per equity share which PQR Ltd. can offer to pay for XYZ Ltd.?
(ii) What is the minimum price per equity share at which the management of XYZ Ltd. will be
willing to offer their controlling interest?
Solution
(i) Calculation of maximum price per share at which PQR Ltd. can offer to pay for XYZ Ltd.’s share
Market Value (10,00,000 x ₹ 24) ₹ 2,40,00,000
Synergy Gain ₹ 80,00,000
Saving of Overpayment ₹ 30,00,000
₹ 3,50,00,000
Maximum Price (₹ 3,50,00,000 / 10,00,000) ₹ 35
ER = 0.875
(ii) Calculation of minimum price per share at which the management of XYZ Ltd.’s will be willing to
offer their controlling interest
Value of XYZ Ltd.’s Management Holding (40% of 10,00,000 x ₹ 24) ₹ 96,00,000
Add: PV of loss of remuneration to top management ₹ 30,00,000
₹ 1,26,00,000
No. of Shares 4,00,000
Minimum Price (₹ 1,26,00,000 / 4,00,000) ₹ 31.50
RBI Audit suggested that bank has either to liquidate or to merge with other bank.
Bank 'P' is professionally managed bank with low gross NPA of 5%. It has Net NPA as 0% and CAR
at 16%. Its share is quoted in the market @ ₹ 128 per share. The board of directors of bank ' P '
has submitted a proposal to RBI for takeover of bank 'R' on the basis of share exchange ratio.
It was decided to issue shares at Book Value of Bank 'P' to the shareholders of Bank 'R'. All assets
and liabilities are to be taken over at Book Value.
For the swap ratio, weights assigned to different parameters are as follows:
Solution
a) Swap Ratio
Gross NPA 5: 40 i.e. 5 / 40 x 30% = 0.0375
CAR 4: 16 i.e. 4 / 16 x 20% = 0.0500
Market Price 8 : 128 i.e. 8 / 128 x 40% = 0.025
Book Value Per Share 15 : 120 i.e. 15 / 120 x 10% = 0.0125
0.125
Thus, for every 1 share of Bank ‘R’ 0.125 share of Bank ‘P’ shall be issued.
Balance Sheet
₹ lac ₹ lac
Paid up Share Capital 517.50 Cash in Hand & RBI 2900.00
Reserves & Surplus 5500.00 Balance with other banks 2000.00
Capital Reserve 192.50 Investment 16100.00
Deposits 44000.00 Advances 30500.00
Other Liabilities 3390.00 Other Assets 2100.00
53600.00 53600.00
CAR/CRWAR =
₹
CAR = = 14.53%
₹
An independent firm of merchant bankers engaged for the negotiation, have produced the following
estimates of cash flows from the business of XY Ltd.:
Year ended By way of ₹ lakhs
31.3.07 after tax earnings for equity 105
31.3.08 do 120
31.3.09 Do 125
31.3.10 Do 120
31.3.11 Do 100
Terminal Value estimate 200
It is the recommendation of the merchant banker that the business of XY Ltd. may be valued on
the basis of the average of (i) Aggregate of discounted cash flows at 8% and (ii) Net assets value.
Present value factors at 8% for years
1-5: 0.93 0.86 0.79 0.74 0.68
Solution
Price / share of AB Ltd. for determination of number of shares to be issued = (₹ 570 + ₹ 430) / 2 =
₹ 500
H Ltd. proposes to buy out B Ltd. and the following information is provided to you as part of the
scheme of buying:
a) The weighted average post tax maintainable profits of H Ltd. and B Ltd. for the last 4 years
are ₹ 300 crores and ₹ 10 crores respectively.
b) Both the companies envisage a capitalization rate of 8%.
c) H Ltd. has a contingent liability of ₹ 300 crores as on 31st March, 2012.
d) H Ltd. to issue shares of ₹ 100 each to the shareholders of B Ltd. in terms of the exchange
ratio as arrived on a Fair Value basis. (Please consider weights of 1 and 3 for the value of
shares arrived on Net Asset basis and Earnings capitalization method respectively for both
H Ltd. and B Ltd.)
You are required to arrive at the value of the shares of both H Ltd. and B Ltd. under:
(i) Net Asset Value Method
(ii) Earnings Capitalisation Method
(iii) Exchange ratio of shares of H Ltd. to be issued to the shareholders of B Ltd. on a Fair value
basis (taking into consideration the assumption mentioned in point 4 above.)
Solution
H Ltd should issue its 0.1787 share for each share of B Ltd.
Note: In above Solution it has been assumed that the contingent liability will materialize at its
full amount.
T Ltd. plans to offer a price for E Ltd., business as a whole which will be 7 times EBIDAT reduced
by outstanding debt, to be discharged by own shares at market price.
E Ltd. is planning to seek one share in T Ltd. for every 2 shares in E Ltd. based on the market price.
Tax rate for the two companies may be assumed as 30%.
Calculate and show the following under both alternatives – T Ltd.'s offer and E Ltd.'s plan:
(i) Net consideration payable.
(ii) No. of shares to be issued by T Ltd.
(iii) EPS of T Ltd. after acquisition.
(iv) Expected market price per share of T Ltd. after acquisition.
(v) State briefly the advantages to T Ltd. from the acquisition.
Solution
₹ in lakhs
(i) Net consideration payable
6 lakhs shares x ₹ 110 660
Board of Directors of the Company have decided to issue necessary equity shares of Fortune Pharma
Ltd. of Re. 1 each, without any consideration to the shareholders of Fortune India Ltd. For that
purpose following points are to be considered:
a) Transfer of Liabilities & Assets at Book value.
b) Estimated Profit for the year 2009-10 is ₹ 11,400 Lakh for Fortune India Ltd. & ₹ 1,470
lakhs for Fortune Pharma Ltd.
c) Estimated Market Price of Fortune Pharma Ltd. is ₹ 24.50 per share.
d) Average P/E Ratio of FMCG sector is 42 & Pharma sector is 25, which is to be expected for
both the companies.
Calculate:
1) The Ratio in which shares of Fortune Pharma are to be issued to the shareholders of Fortune
India Ltd.
2) Expected Market price of Fortune India (FMCG) Ltd.
3) Book Value per share of both the Companies immediately after Demerger.
Solution
Share holders’ funds (₹ Lakhs)
Particulars Fortune India Ltd. Fortune Pharma Ltd. Fortune India (FMCG) Ltd.
Assets 70,000 25,100 44,900
Outside liabilities 25,000 4,100 20,900
Net worth 45,000 21,000 24,000
1) Calculation of Shares of Fortune Pharma Ltd. to be issued to shareholders of Fortune India Ltd.
Fortune Pharma Ltd.
Estimated Profit (₹ in lakhs) 1,470
Estimated market price (₹) 24.5
Estimated P/E 25
Estimated EPS (₹) 0.98
No. of shares lakhs 1,500
Hence, Ratio is 1 share of Fortune Pharma Ltd. for 2 shares of Fortune India Ltd.
OR for 0.50 share of Fortune Pharma Ltd. for 1 share of Fortune India Ltd.
Additional Information:
(i) Shareholders of Leopard Ltd. will get one share in Tiger Ltd. for every two shares. External
liabilities are expected to be settled at ₹ 5,00,000. Shares of Tiger Ltd. would be issued at
its current price of ₹ 15 per share. Debenture holders will get 13% convertible debentures
in the purchasing company for the same amount. Debtors and inventories are expected to
realize ₹ 2,00,000.
(ii) Tiger Ltd. has decided to operate the business of Leopard Ltd. as a separate division. The
division is likely to give cash flows (after tax) to the extent of ₹ 5,00,000 per year for 6
years. Tiger Ltd. has planned that, after 6 years, this division would be demerged and
disposed of for ₹ 2,00,000.
(iii) The company’s cost of capital is 16%.
Make a report to the Board of the company advising them about the financial feasibility of this
acquisition.
Net present values for 16% for ₹ 1 are as follows:
Years 1 2 3 4 5 6
PV 0.862 0.743 0.641 0.552 0.476 0.410
Solution
Calculation of Purchase Consideration
₹
Issue of Share 35000 x ₹ 15 5,25,000
External Liabilities settled 5,00,000
13% Debentures 3,00,000
13,25,000
Less: Realization of Debtors and Inventories 2,00,000
Cash 50,000
10,75,000
Net Present Value = PV of Cash Inflow + PV of Demerger of Leopard Ltd. – Cash Outflow
= ₹ 8,49,000
Following information, ignoring any potential synergistic benefits arising out of possible acquisitions,
are available:
(i) Profit after tax for KLM for the financial year which has just ended is estimated to be ₹ 10
crore.
(ii) KLM's after – tax profit has an increasing trend of 7% each year and the same is expected
to continue.
(iii) Estimated post tax market return is 10% and risk – free rate is 4%. These rates are
expected to continue.
(iv) Corporate tax rate is 30%.
Assume gearing level of KLM to be the same as for ABC and a debt beta of zero.
Solution
b) P/E valuation
(Based on earning of ₹ 10 Crore)
Using proxy Using XYZ’s
Entity’s P/E P/E
Pre synergistic value 12 x ₹ 10 Crore 10 X ₹ 10 Crore
= ₹ 120 Crore = ₹ 100 Crore
Post synergistic value 12 x ₹ 10 Crore x 1.1 10 x ₹ 10 Crore X 1.1
= ₹ 132 Crore = ₹ 110 Crore
Range of valuation
Pre synergistic ₹ 100 Crore ₹ 136.13 Crore
Post synergistic ₹ 110 Crore ₹ 149.75 Crore
Solution
a) Swap Ratio
Thus, for every share of Weak Bank, 0.1750 share of Strong Bank shall be issued.
150
× 0.1750 = 2.625 lakh shares
10
c) Balance Sheet after Merger
Balance Sheet
₹ lac ₹ lac
Paid up Share Capital 526.25 Cash in Hand & RBI 2900.00
Reserves & Surplus 5500.00 Balance with other banks 2000.00
Capital Reserve 153.75 Investment 20100.00
Deposits 48000.00 Advances 30500.00
Other Liabilities 3390.00 Other Assets 2070.00
57570.00 57570.00
CAR / CRWAR =
The Company did not perform well and has suffered sizable losses during the last few years.
However, it is felt that the company could be nursed back to health by proper financial
restructuring. Consequently the following scheme of reconstruction has been drawn up :
(i) Equity shares are to be reduced to ₹ 25/- per share, fully paid up;
(ii) Preference shares are to be reduced (with coupon rate of 10%) to equal number of shares
of ₹ 50 each, fully paid up.
(iii) Debenture holders have agreed to forgo the accrued interest due to them. In the future,
the rate of interest on debentures is to be reduced to 9 percent.
(iv) Trade creditors will forego 25 percent of the amount due to them.
(v) The company issues 6 lakh of equity shares at ₹ 25 each and the entire sum was to be paid
on application. The entire amount was fully subscribed by promoters.
(vi) Land and Building was to be revalued at ₹ 450 lakhs, Plant and Machinery was to be written
down by ₹ 120 lakhs and a provision of ₹ 15 lakhs had to be made for bad and doubtful debts.
Required:
a) Show the impact of financial restructuring on the company’s activities.
b) Prepare the fresh balance sheet after the reconstructions is completed on the basis of the
above proposals.
Solution
(‘ii) Amount of ₹ 911 lakhs utilized to write off losses, fictious assets and over – valued assets.
b) Balance sheet of Grape Fruit Ltd as at 31st March 2019 (after re-construction)
(₹ in lakhs)
Liabilities Amount Assets Amount
12 lakhs equity shares of ₹ 25/-300 Land & Building 450
each
10% Preference shares of ₹ 100 Plant & Machinery 180
50/- each
Capital Reserve 236 Furnitures & Fixtures 50
9% Debentures 200 Inventory 150
Loan from Bank 74 Sundry debtors 70
Trade Creditors 255 Prov. for Doubtful Debts -15 55
Cash-at-Bank (Balancing figure) * 280
1165 1165
*Opening Balance of ₹ 130/- lakhs + Sale proceeds from issue of new equity shares ₹ 150/-
lakhs.
a) Determine the maximum exchange ratio acceptable to the shareholders of ABC Ltd., if the
P / E ratio of the combined firm is expected to be 8?
b) Determine the minimum exchange ratio acceptable to the shareholders XYZ Ltd., if the P /
E ratio of the combined firm is expected to be 10?
Note: Make calculation in lakh multiples and compute ratio upto 4 decimal points.
Solution
Evaluate and Restructure the financial line items shown assuming a composition in which creditors
agree to convert two thirds of their debt into equity at book value. Assume Nishan will pay tax at a
rate of 15% on income after the restructuring, and that principal repayments are reduced
proportionately with debt. Demonstrate as to who will control the company and by how big a margin
after the restructuring? (8 Marks)
Solution
Creditors would convert Rs. 10,00,000 in debt to equity by accepting Rs. 1,000,000 / Rs. 20 = 50,000
shares of stock.
The remaining Rs. 5,00,000 of debt would generate interest of Rs. 5,00,000 x 0.12 = Rs. 60,000
Repayment of principal would be reduced by two thirds to Rs. 25000 per year.
After the restructuring there will be a total of (35000 + 50000) 85000 shares of equity stock
outstanding. The original shareholders will still own 35000 shares (approximately 41%), while the
creditors will own 50,000 shares (59%). Hence the creditors will control the company by a substantial
majority.
Solution
Working Notes:
X Ltd Y Ltd
5= 4=
, , , ,
Statement of Profit
X Ltd. Y Ltd.
Sales 93,75,000 25,00,000
Less: Operating Exp. 80,62,500 19,50,000
EBIT 13,12,500 5,50,000
Less: Interest 1,20,000 1,44,000
EBT 11,92,500 4,06,000
Less: Tax @ 30% 3,57,750 1,21,800
EAT 8,34,750 2,84,200
X Ltd. Y Ltd.
.
(i) Swap Ratio =
.
Acquirer Co Target Co. Weight
X Ltd Y Ltd
EPS 0.34 4.74 0.40
MPS 75 150 0.60
834750 + 284200
=
1,00,000 + (60,000 × 1.227)
1118950
=
1,85,620
= 6.03
MPS = PE x EPS
= 8.99 x 6.03
= Rs. 54.21
While Shareholders of X Ltd. will lose EPS of Rs. 1.35 (Rs. 8.34 - Rs. 6.99) per share the
shareholders of Y Ltd. stands to gain EPS of Rs. 5.23 (Rs. 9.97 - Rs. 4.74) per share.
Whether the new Equity Beta (βE) justifies increase in the value of equity on account of
leverage? (12 Marks)
Solution
To calculate Equity Beta first we shall calculate Weighted Average of Asset Beta as follows:
Accordingly,
1.385 = β + β
1.385 = β + 0.24
βEquity = 1.86
βKGFL = 3.296
Solution
₹
Existing No. of Equity Shares = = 1 Crore
₹
Price at which share to be bought back = Rs. 1,500 + 10% of Rs. 1,500 = Rs. 1,650
Amount required for Buyback of Shares = Rs. 1,650 x 20 Lakh = Rs. 330 Crore
The merger will be affected by means of stock swap (exchange) of 3 shares of C Ltd. for 1 share
of P Ltd.
After the merger it is expected that due to synergy effects, Annual Earnings (Post Tax) are
expected to be 8% higher than sum of the earnings of the two companies individually. Further, it is
expected that P/E Ratio of S Ltd. shall be average of P/E Ratios of two companies before the
merger.
Evaluate the extent to which shareholders of P Ltd. will be benefitted per share from the proposed
merger. (8 Marks)
Solution
Working Notes:
Rs. lakh
Earnings of C Ltd. 10000
Earnings of D Ltd. 5800
15800
Growth 0.08
Earnings of S Ltd. (15800 x 1.08) 17064
Share of Shareholders of P Ltd. in S Ltd. (3000 / 7000) x 153576 Rs. 65818.29 lakh
Market Value of P Ltd. before merger (5800 x 10) Rs. 58000.00 lakh
Gains to Shareholders Rs. 7818.29 lakh
No. of Shares (before merger) 1000 lakh
Gain Per Share Rs. 7.82
The promoters holding is to be restricted to 75% as per the norms of listing requirement. The Board
of Directors have decided to fall in line to restrict the Promoters’ holding to 75% by issuing Bonus
Shares to minority shareholders while maintaining the same Price Earnings Ratio (P/E).
Solution
(i) No. of Bonus Shares to be issued:
Free Float Capitalization = ₹ 45 crore
PE = = .
=5
Total No. of shares after bonus issue = 150 lacs + 10 lacs = 160 lacs
Solution
Estimation of Ratios
Sl. No. Particulars SK Ltd. AS Ltd. Average
(i) Market to Book Value 450
= 1.125
400
= 1.333 1.2290
400 300
(ii) Market to Replacement Cost 450
= 0.750
400
= 0.727 0.7385
600 550
Determine the different range of values of shares using P/E Model. (6 Marks)
Solution
The range of values using P/E Ratio and EPS either historic or projected are as follows.
EPS Value (₹) P/E Ratio Value Value of
Shares
Historic 3.40 Lowest 4 13.60
Historic 3.40 Current 5 17.00
Historic 3.40 Highest 7 23.80
Expected 4.00 Lowest 4 16.00
Expected 4.00 Current 5 20.00
Expected 4.00 Highest 7 28.00
You are required to calculate sustainable growth rate for both the proposals. (8 Marks)
Solution
.
ROE × 0.60 × 100 3.69%
.
ICL SVL
Fixed Assets
Land & Building (Net) 720 190
Plant & Machinery (Net) 900 350
Furniture & Fixtures (Net) 30 1,650 10 550
Current Assets 775 580
Less: Current Liabilities
Creditors 230 130
Overdrafts 35 10
Provision for Tax 145 50
Provision for dividends 60 470 50 240
Net Assets 1,955 890
Paid up Share Capital (₹ 10 per share) 250 125
Reserves and Surplus 1050 1,300 660 785
Borrowing 655 105
Capital Employed 1,955 890
Market Price Per Share 52 75
ICL’s Land & Buildings are stated at current prices. SVL’s Land & Buildings are revalued three years
ago. There has been an increase of 30 per cent per year in the value of Land & Buildings.
ICL’s Management wants to determine the premium on the shares over the current market price
which can be paid on the acquisition of SVL. You are required to determine the premium using:
(i) Net Worth adjusted for the current value of Land & Buildings plus the estimated average
profit after tax (PAT) for the next five years.
(ii) The dividend growth formula.
(iii) ICL will push forward which method during the course of negotiations?
Period (t) 1 2 3 4 5
FVIF (30%, t) 1.300 1.690 2.197 2.856 3.713
FVIF (15%, t) 1.15 2.4725 3.9938 5.7424 7.7537
Solution
Alternatively, if given figure of dividend is considered as D1 then Premium over Current Market
Price shall be computed as follows:
Cost of Equity +g 10
+ 0.15 0.2833
75
Expected Growth Rate after Merger 0.18
Expected Market Price 10.00 / (0.2833 – 0.18) 96.81
Premium over Current Market Price (96.81 - 75)/ 75 x 100 29.08%
(iii) During the course of negotiations, ICL will push forward valuation based on Growth Rate Method
as it will lead to least cash outflow.
Solution
No. of shares issued to shareholders of Tall Ltd. in the ratio of 1:3 6,00,000
Existing price of one share of Long Ltd. ₹ 180
Value of consideration paid for acquisition of Tall Ltd. ₹ 10,80,00,000
Less: Existing Value of Tall Ltd., as a separate entity ₹ 9,00,00,000
Net Cost of acquisition of Tall Ltd. ₹ 1,80,00,000
Solution
Such mergers involve firms engaged in unrelated type of business operations. In other words, the
business activities of acquirer and the target are neither related to each other horizontally (i.e.,
producing the same or competiting products) nor vertically (having relationship of buyer and supplier).
In a pure conglomerate merger, there are no important common factors between the companies in
production, marketing, research and development and technology. There may however be some degree
of overlapping in one or more of these common factors. Such mergers are in fact, unification of
different kinds of businesses under one flagship company. The purpose of merger remains utilization
of financial resources, enlarged debt capacity and also synergy of managerial functions.
Solution
1) Sell off / Partial Sell off: A sell off is the sale of an asset, factory, division, product line or
subsidiary by one entity to another for a purchase consideration payable either in cash or in the
form of securities. Partial Sell off, is a form of divestiture, wherein the firm sells its business
unit or a subsidiary to another because it deemed to be unfit with the company’s core business
strategy.
Normally, sell-offs are done because the subsidiary doesn't fit into the parent company's core
strategy. The market may be undervaluing the combined businesses due to a lack of synergy
between the parent and the subsidiary. So, the management and the board decide that the
subsidiary is better off under a different ownership.
Besides getting rid of an unwanted subsidiary, sell-offs also raise cash, which can be used to
pay off debts. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, corporate raiders used debt to finance
acquisitions.
2) Spin-off: In this case, a part of the business is separated and created as a separate firm. The
existing shareholders of the firm get proportionate ownership. So, there is no change in
ownership and the same shareholders continue to own the newly created entity in the same
proportion as previously in the original firm. The management of spin-off division is however,
parted with. Spin-off does not bring fresh cash. The reasons for spin off may be:
a) Separate identity to a part/division.
b) To avoid the takeover attempt by a predator by making the firm unattractive to him since a
valuable division is spun-off.
c) To create separate Regulated and unregulated lines of business.
3) Split-up: This involves breaking up of the entire firm into a series of spin off (by creating
separate legal entities). The parent firm no longer legally exists and only the newly created
entities survive. For instance, a corporate firm has 4 divisions namely A, B, C, D. All these 4
divisions shall be split-up to create 4 new corporate firms with full autonomy and legal status.
The original corporate firm is to be wound up. Since de-merged units are relatively smaller in
size, they are logistically more convenient and manageable. Therefore, it is understood that
spin-off and split-up are likely to enhance shareholders value and bring efficiency and
effectiveness.
4) Equity Carve outs: This is like spin off, however, some shares of the new company are sold in
the market by making a public offer, so this brings cash. More and more companies are using
equity carve-outs to boost shareholder value. A parent firm makes a subsidiary public through
an initial public offering (IPO) of shares, amountin to a partial sell-off. A new publicly listed
company is created, but the parent keeps a controlling stake in the newly traded subsidiary.
A carve-out is a strategic avenue a parent firm may take when one of its subsidiaries is growing
faster and carrying higher valuations than other businesses owned by the parent. A carve-out
generates cash because shares in the subsidiary are sold to the public, but the issue also unlocks
the value of the subsidiary unit and enhances the parent's shareholder value.