Measurement: Sensors 25 (2023) 100615

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Measurement: Sensors
journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com/journal/measurement-sensors

Systematically efficiency enabled energy usage method for an IOT based

WSN environment
G.S. Uthayakumar a, *, Beulah Jackson b, C. Ramesh Babu Durai c, A. Kalaimani d,
S. Sargunavathi e, S. Kamatchi f
a
St.Joseph’s Institute of Technology, India
b
Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India
c
Dhanalakshmi College of Engineering, India
d
Panimalar Engineering College, India
e
Sriram Engineering College, India
f
Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, India

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: The Internet of Things (IoT) allows smart items to communicate and share data, making it simpler for the
WSN physical world to integrate with computerized structures, hence enhancing ease and control. These organizations
IoT have an edge over regular organizations and have enormous ramifications even in the field of Internet of things
Energy consumption
yet regardless of their predominant attributes they face a few significant issues, for example, versatility, security
Uneven clustering
Throughput
and restricted on-board power, and so on. Rise of remote sensing networks (WSN) threatens disruptions, urgency,
PDR and enhanced displays in coming decades. WSN data transmission relies heavily on energy. Likewise, there are a
variety of group-based communication protocols for energy conservation, which vary depending on their use.
The best suited protocol should be chosen. Scarcely any upgrades to work on its effectiveness and capacity to
convey information without parcel misfortune is accomplished to a more noteworthy degree.

1. Introduction handling, transmission), network layer (i.e., conventions, directing) and

application layer; the majority of these endeavors have zeroed in on
1.1. Wireless sensor networks (WSN) unambiguous and separate parts of energy dissemination in WSNs.
Because of the great reconciliation of these parts inside a WSN, and
WSNs, as distributed networks of sensors that can detect, process, consequently their exchange, every part can’t be dealt with freely
and transmit, are increasingly used in design, health, and climate to without respect for different parts; in another words, improving the
monitor far locations for low cost. Sensors (a.k.a nodes) in such orga­ energy utilization of one part, for example Macintosh conventions, may
nizations are liable for four significant assignments: information expand the energy prerequisites of different parts, for example, direct­
conglomeration, sending and getting information, and in-network in­ ing. In this way, limiting energy in one part may not ensure improve­
formation handling. This infers that they should successfully use their ment of the general energy use of the organization. Dissimilar to the
assets, including memory use, CPU power and, all the more critically, majority of the flow research that spotlights on a solitary part of WSNs,
energy, to build their lifetime and efficiency. Other than gathering en­ we present an Energy Driven Architecture (EDA) as another engineering
ergy, expanding the lifetime of sensors in the organization by dimin­ method for limiting the complete energy utilization of WSNs. The design
ishing their energy utilization has become one of the principal distinguishes nonexclusive and fundamental energy-consuming con­
difficulties of involving WSNs in commonsense applications. Because of stituents of the organization. EDA as a constituent-based engineering is
this test, throughout recent years there have been expanding endeavors utilized to send WSNs as per energy scattering through their constitu­
to limit energy utilization by means of new calculations and strategies in ents. This viewpoint on the vast majority of energy use in WSNs may be
various layers of the WSN, including the equipment layer (i.e., detecting, utilized to improve and regulate energy consumption and extend the

* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (G.S. Uthayakumar), [email protected] (B. Jackson), [email protected] (C. Ramesh Babu Durai),
[email protected] (A. Kalaimani), [email protected] (S. Sargunavathi), [email protected] (S. Kamatchi).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100615
Received 6 August 2022; Accepted 28 November 2022
Available online 29 November 2022
2665-9174/© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/4.0/).
G.S. Uthayakumar et al. Measurement: Sensors 25 (2023) 100615

organization’s lifespan. The WSN are shown in Fig. 1. which are crucial components of the clever city. People’s presence in a
During disputes, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are utilized to smart city is enhanced by a few things and headways that the city has to
capture and gather data [1–3], giving the necessary data to be handled. provide; the clever city has many components that contribute to its
In addition, remote sensor networks (WSN) are now a standard growth, establishment, and organization. IoT changes urban direction
component of the detecting layer and are widely used. There are many and security [7].
advantages to remote sensors, including their small size, cheap cost, and
great reactivity. As a result, remote sensors have become an important 1.3. IOT application requirements
component and have been utilized in a number of situations, such as
health monitoring in the human body, forest fire warning, failure loca­ To execute IoT plans, applications must be built, but execution re­
tion in modern technology, target tracking in the military sector, and so quires a few basics:
on. When a sensor organization collects data, it sends it to the data
gatherer through specialized devices. Furthermore, when integrated 1. IoT relies on adaptability to be successful. If the stage can handle
with modern technology, a remote sensor may execute directives from several contraptions without negatively impacting the application,
the command center or respond to weather independently depending on it’s an excellent one.
response criteria. 2. IoT apps must be trustworthy. These components enable data to flow
in different forms and sizes across the sensor network.
1.2. Internet of things 3. Self-adapting, optimizable, and customizable systems are essential
for Internet of Things (IoT) applications.
The IoT refers to the Internet-connected connectedness of real-world 4. IoT apps should comprehend what’s happening in an uncommon
items and technology utilized in everyday life. It refers to the many sorts environment and make actions based on that knowledge.
of things that communicate with one another via the use of various 5. IoT applications should be dynamic and responsive, with little or no
sensors, actuators, and processors. The goal of IoT is to achieve a sig­ downtime. For example: fundamental applications like clinical ben­
nificant amount of information with little human intervention [4]. The efits additionally bury vehicle correspondences make unsafe differ­
IoT automates and enlightens many aspects of daily life, making life ence assuming there ought to be an event of inactivity.
more pleasurable; here, devices are autonomous and prepared to make 6. IoT apps capture personal and private data, including unique data
intelligent decisions without human intervention. In the Internet of and development logs. Data protection has a safety-critical standard.
Things, many heterogeneous devices are connected through networks.
Today, industry, healthcare, transportation, farming, and the home 2. Literature survey
environment all use IoT.A magnificent city encompasses all of the re­
gion’s users of information and communication technologies (ICTs) [5]. In [8], the focus was on maximizing energy in a WSN, and a strategy
It similarly encompasses all applications and makes municipal organi­ for combining fluffy information was presented to improve energy
zations and observation more vigilant, astute, and competent [5]. production [9]. saved energy and united Firefly and Hierarchical
Without remote sensor networking (WSN), it is impossible to conceive of Maximum Likelihood for WSN sensor planning, delivering optimum
an intelligent city. Sensors and actuators alter the actual world by performance [10,11]. focused on energy-efficient target tracking in
interacting with it. Many devices coupled by sensors create a lot of data submerged remote sensor networks with circulating combination
in a diverse environment. Data is maintained and analyzed to generate structure. They saved energy and limited accuracy. Reference [12] built
insights and aid decision-making [4]. A superb city has both beautiful a better square root molecule channel to increase target following ac­
and important objects. Objects with many sensors collect a lot of data. A curacy and employed self-adaptive fake fish swarm computing to
city’s IoT network must be adaptive so new devices may be added and advance sensor booking. The distinctive feature of [13,14] was that it
old ones removed. Due to extensive application and development combined fake estimates with sensor readings, and its feasibility had
qualification, mixing. Fig. 2 depicts IoT. been shown using simulation models.
IoT’s biggest challenges include interoperability, care, flexibility, WSN clustering approach and optimum sensor cluster head selection
large data, security, trustworthiness, dynamic variation, quality, and under energy limitations. Most energy was spent during head-to-node
latency. WSN becomes testing [6] according to the viewpoint of the keen communication. The simulation results showed that the recommended
city. In the intelligent city, every aspect of society is well-served by the group-based method, which employed the group’s peripheral as the
enormous variety of services available. It depicts medical advantages, head, extended the organization’s lifetime by around 20%. Similarly,
adventures, transportation, agriculture, and house automation, all of references [15–18] utilized the cluster method to the transmitted remote
sensor organizations and identified the group leader using streamlining
calculations.
Four basic components make up a WSN node: ADCs transform simple
signals into computerized designs; handling units give basic information
processing and computing; and a power unit determines the sensor
node’s active life span. Since WSN functioning depends substantially on
sensor node battery life, energy saving is a primary goal [19,20]. It is the
information package that consumes the most energy in WSNs. Unlike
traditional organizations, the WSN has unique characteristics [21,22].
When addressing network inclusion, runtime geography, node alloca­
tion, node organization, node portability, energy effectiveness and uti­
lization, network transmission and application regional climates and
climates in general [23], these one-of-a-kind attributes are typically
taken into account [24].
The regulations for two-level heterogeneous WSNs are specified in
DEEC [24]. As demonstrated in our work, LEACH may be aware of
heterogeneity if the edges for choosing CHs incorporate the weighting
probability for heterogeneous nodes.
Fig. 1. Wireless sensor networks. Such a study remains relevant because of the rapid advancements in

2
G.S. Uthayakumar et al. Measurement: Sensors 25 (2023) 100615

Fig. 2. IoT.

processing, new nanotechnology, and a wide range of current applica­ unpredictable components [31,32].
tions. There are a number of alternative steering conventions, and we’ve
tried to show what works best for the organization’s energy use in this
2.1. Heterogeneous assets
assessment. Because sensors have limited energy, WSN steering pro­
tocols must be energy-efficient. The steering convention aims to increase
In actuality, sensors might have varied capacities in terms of starting
WSN sensors’ lifetime. In light of the findings of the research, remote
power, consumption rate, processing capacity, etc. Several often more
sensor companies are still anticipated to implement a more efficient,
stable nodes execute information separation, combining, and trans­
adaptable, and powerful clustering strategy for improved performance
portation. Consequently, heterogeneous sensor networks are increas­
[25].
ingly used by companies because of their proximity to real-world
The major concern in WSN conference planning is energy produc­
conditions [32]. Energy heterogeneity is needed for computational and
tivity. The LEACH convention is the most productive because it uses
interface heterogeneity. Link heterogeneity is taken into consideration
group-based steering. LEACH has been reworked with new approaches
in most clustering standards. Benefits include:
to provide better energy protection for the whole sensor network.
Conventional remote organizations need security measures for their
• Information sending inactivity: Using computational and interface
distant sensing networks. The security of a sensor network’s nodes is
may minimize sink-sensor node distance (in terms of hops). This
critical since they are spread out across a large region [26].
decreases mailing-related inactivity. Important to reduce reaction
The ascent of remote sensor organizations (WSN) as one of the
times.
dominating development inclines in the approaching many years has
• Unwavering quality of information transmission: Since remote con­
posed different stand-out challenges to researchers. The development in
nections are faulty, the transmission rate reduces with each hop.
detection, along with the ability to control electricity and communicate
HWSN reduces source-to-sink hops.
via the Internet, makes it possible for it to be misused in the future.
Additionally, the combination of distant communication advancements
Importance: Costs expected to rise.
creates a wide range of safety issues. It is the purpose of this study to
Importance:Reduced reaction time.
examine and provide methods for securing the WSN against these se­
curity threats and obstacles [27].
• Dependability of information transmission: Since remote connec­
Solar energy based energy is consistently accessible in bounty and
tions are faulty, transmission rate drops with hop count. HWSN re­
the nodes are given the most extreme assurance that they are alive for a
duces source-to-sink hops.
longer time frame whether the nodes are fixed or dynamic. This is more
useful for the Cluster Head that is over troubled. Inevitably, in the event
Importance: Expected increase in transportation costs.
that a similar node is procuring the opportunity to turn into the
The usage of IoT devices may be made more effective and prudent.
following Cluster Head after a round it can perform with next to no
IoT may be used in a number of agricultural settings. Energy and water
mishap as the node would have empowered [28].
are significant areas whose prices may make or break a development
When the energy of various nodes is taken into account, the sug­
project. In anticipation of examining the old, broken water frame, the
gested framework is shown to have poor energy protection both for the
water loss is more than expected, and the water syphon eats energy, so
present approach and the new framework. This, in turn, increases the
we often control the energy deficit. [34].
lifespan of the company, and it’s also a terrific way to gather information
[29,30].
3. Proposed system
This is done by allowing execution to continue after an inventory
interference and preserving the framework state at the moment when a
By the examination of the insect province calculation, to accomplish
stock disappointment is imminent. The framework state maintenance
a generally adjusted energy utilization for various nodes, this paper
may be handled using a variety of transitory approaches documented in
altered the likelihood equation. The upgraded calculation ought to have
writing. State maintenance may be ensured using programming tech­
the option to stream the information parcels in an alternate way, balance
niques and compositional methodologies, which provide equipment
the energy utilization, furthermore, keep away from the combination of
support to keep up with and preserve the state using dedicated non-
the main ideal arrangement. Improved as follows:

3
G.S. Uthayakumar et al. Measurement: Sensors 25 (2023) 100615

Routing Design of between group in light of subterranean insect they consume more energy than the individuals. In this manner, sub­
settlement optimization. sequent to creating the up-and-comer CH, presenting the serious
calculation, when every competitor CH rivals the other applicant CH
Algorithm. a) Ant is responsible for transporting information such as
inside the span Rc to choose the applicant CH of biggest lingering energy
the current bounce count and the creeping line.
to turn into the last CH.
b) Ant uses a method that involves calculating probabilities in order to
The primary competency of the cluster course level is information
look for the next jump node.
transmission. The underground ant settlement enhancement calculation
∑
A(t) = T(t) E(t)/ Tx(t)E(t) where x Ԑ Ni (1) locates the ideal route between clusters to accomplish multi-hop con­
nectivity and minimize CH energy usage far from the base station.
E(t) is there pheromone strength on t time. E(t) local heuristic
considerations. 4. Experimental results
E(t) can be given by

E(t) = [K(t)]i / [d(a,b)]i] + A(t) (2) Network Simulator-2 was used to run the experiment. Assumptions
evaluated included the following: Below are the findings of the
where K(t)is the energy that is left over in the node after it has been used, experiments.
and d(a,b) is the distance between the nodes. Base station location 100,100
Cluster Head proportion p = 6%
i i
A(t) = [K(t) ] / [d(a,b)] X [d(b,c)/d(a,d)] i
(3) Energy in each node 1J
Nodes in number 100
where P coefficient of pheromone evaporation 0< P < 1. Simulation Area 200*200
Size of each packet 4000 bits
c) When insect moves structure node a to b, agreeing to the recipe

D(m,m+1)=(1-P) *D(t)+P * μD(t,t+1) (5)

μD(m,m+1) = L *(Ka + Kb) |d (a,b) 2

(6)
4.1. Network nodes death rate
to refresh pheromone.
Following the loss of energy from half of the network’s nodes Fig. 3
d) If an insect is successful in locating the union node inside the jump below.
node, it will be removed from the search.
e) When an insect reaches a non-objective node and can’t pick the next 4.2. Energy consumption
leap, it gives up the search and the inquiry no longer follows that
path. The sensor network’s energy consumption is shown in Fig. 4. Before
f) Insects halt when they reach the sink node or hop limit. Last, un­ and after the adjustment, the amount of energy used in seconds.
derground insects must have the shortest possible slithering lines.
4.3. Cluster formation
Using the formula, the energy spent by each node every cycle may be
computed. Below Fig. 5 is a comparison of the Cluster Formation before and
after alteration.
Ecr(t) = {Eini-Ers(t)}/D

where Eini Initial node energy. 4.4. THROUGHPUT(BITS/S) VS node density

Ers represents the leftover energy of each node and D represents the
current round for any node. The Throughput(bits/s) vs Node density in both after modification
Opting for the best Cluster Head. and before modification is shown below Fig. 6.
if [ max(E(Ai) && min(distnew) ] then
nCHnew = Ai where the node.
Ai has the maximum Energy E.

3.1. Uneven clustering routing method for WSNS

Each cycle of the lopsided clustering steering calculation for WSNs in

light of subterranean insect state improvement is divided into group
development and cluster course stages.
After a “round,” the calculation splits the cluster and exchanges in­
formation amongst CH. The base station must be enabled to emit a signal
during cluster setup. Each sensor determines distance to the base station
based on received signal integrity. The distance helps sensor nodes pick
the proper transmit capability to convey data to the base station to
conserve energy and helps sensor nodes form clusters. Determining
group size includes unbalanced clustering. The cluster near the base
station will have fewer members, saving CH energy while forwarding
information; the group distant from the base station will have more
members as long-distance communication uses more energy. When the
CH’s distance from the base station reduces, so should its opposition
range.
Since the CH needs to perform information mix and transfer data, Fig. 3. After half the Network is dead.

4
G.S. Uthayakumar et al. Measurement: Sensors 25 (2023) 100615

Fig. 4. Energy consumption.

Fig. 5. Cluster formation.

4.5. Number of nodes VS time

Fig. 7 depicts the node count over time before and after the
adjustment.

5. Conclusion

This paper has revealed a consolidated EAI with an energy-mindful

program to deal with the energy stream from the energy stockpiling
capacitor to the WSNs to manage the jumble between the energy created
by the gatherers and the energy requested by the WSNs to do required
assignments. Clustering issue for WSN is investigated and dissected also,
an energy productive various leveled convention is introduced in this
paper. The organization is partitioned into groups equally in each layer.
The key examination point is the manner by which to choose the fitting
span of the inward layer and the number of groups the inward and
Fig. 6. Throughput(bits/s) vs Node density.
external layer ought to be isolated into independently to keep the
equilibrium of energy utilization in the organization.
For future IoT applications, a deterministic and distributive model
ought to be utilized to plan a mixture steering convention for WSNs. This

5
G.S. Uthayakumar et al. Measurement: Sensors 25 (2023) 100615

[8] Madan Mohan Agarwal, Govil Mahesh Chandra, Madhavi Sinha, Saurabh Gupta,
Fuzzy based data fusion for energy efficient Internet of things, Int. J. Grid High
Perform. Comput. (IJGHPC) 11 (3) (2019) 46e58.
[9] Pratik Goswami, Ziwei Yan, Amrit Mukherjee, Lixia Yang, Routray Sidheswar,
G. Palai, An energy efficient clustering using firefly and HML for optimal wireless
sensor network, Optik (2019) 1e8 (on line).
[10] Hanlin Feng, Zhiwei Cai, Target tracking based on improved square root cubature
particle filter via underwater wireless sensor network, IET Commun. 13 (8) (2019),
1008e15.
[11] Huayan Chen, Senlin Zhang, Meiqin Liu, Qunfei Zhang, An artificial measurement-
based adaptive filter for energy-efficient target tracking via underwater wireless
sensor networks, Sensors 17 (2017) 971.
[12] Feng Juan, Xiaozhu Shi, Jinxin Zhang, Dynamic cluster heads selection and data
aggregation for efficient target monitoring and tracking in wireless sensor
networks, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Netw. 14 (6) (2018) 1e14.
[13] J. Lin, W. Xiao, E.L. Lewis, L. Xie, Energy-efficient distributed adaptive multisensor
scheduling for target tracking in wireless sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Instrum.
Meas. 58 (6) (2009), 1886e96.
[14] Y. Liu, B. Xu, L. Feng, Energy-balanced multiple-sensor collaborative scheduling for
maneuvering target tracking in wireless sensor networks, J. Control Theor. Appl. 9
(1) (2011) 58e65.
[15] S. Aeron, V. Saligrama, D.A. Castanon, Efficient sensor management policies for
distributed target tracking in multihop sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Signal
Process. 56 (6) (2008), 2562e74.
Fig. 7. Number of Nodes vs Time. [16] J.N. Al-Karaki, A.E. Kamal, Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a
survey, IEEE Wireless Commun. 11 (6) (2004) 6–27.
[17] K. Kaur, B. Singh, Wireless sensor network based: design principles & measuring
thought for IoT sensor organizations will consider the time touchy in­ performance of IDS, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 1 (28) (2010) 94–99.
formation and will comprehend power and versatility. Later on we will [18] I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, A survey on sensor
endeavor to concentrate on crossover conventions and how these pro­ networks, IEEE Commun. Mag. 40 (8) (2002) 102–105.
[19] M. Chu, H. Haussecker, F. Zhao, Scalable information driven sensor querying and
active and responsive organizations stand against Internet empowered routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks, Int. J. High Perform. Comput.
WSNs. It is the need of the present truly rising utilization of IoT based Appl. 16 (3) (2002) 293–313.
systems to plan more astute and more energy effective conventions. [20] S.K. Singh, M. Singh, D.K. Singh, Routing protocols in wireless sensor networks a
survey, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Syst. 1 (2) (2010) 63–83.
[21] L. Qing, Q. Zhu, M. Wang, Design of a distributed energy efficient clustering
Declaration of competing interest algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Elsevier Comput. Commun.
29 (2006) 2230–2237.
[22] R.M. Charaan, Dilip, P. Malathi, A review on descendants of LEACH protocol - a
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
pragmatic approach, Int. J. Adv. Res. 10 (2022) 751–759.
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence [23] D. Charaan, R. Ramesh, E. Uma, Energy balanced clustering algorithms on LEACH
the work reported in this paper. protocol for WSN, Int. J. Innovat. Sci. Res. 23 (2016) 293–302.
[24] R.M. Charaan, Dilip, Collation of security for assorted attacks in wireless sensor
networks, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Manag. 4 (2015) 147–156.
References [25] R.M. Charaan, Dilip, R. Ramesh, Correlative analysis on enhanced descendents of
leach protocol for wireless sensor networks, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 68 (2014)
[1] M.A.A. Da Cruz, J.J.P.C. Rodrigues, J. Al-Muhtadi, V.V. Korotaev, VHC. 427–442.
v Albuqurque, A reference model for Internet of things middleware, IEEE Internet [26] R.M. Charaan, Dilip, R. Ramesh, N.T. Kumar, Effect. Anal. r-leach Protoc. Wirel.
Things J. 5 (2) (2018), 871e83. Sens. Netw. 6 (2014) 1454–1464.
[2] P.P. Ray, A survey on Internet of things architecture, J. King Saud. Univ. Comput. [27] R. Ramesh, R.M. Charaan, Dilip, N. Kumar, Uma Elangovan, Implementation of
Inf. Sci. 30 (3) (2018), 291e319. load balancing in leach protocol for wireless sensor networks, in: 2nd International
[3] Lida Xu, He Wu, Shancang Li, Internet of things in industries: a survey, IEEE Trans. Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET’2014),
Ind. Inf. 10 (4) (2014), 2233e43. 2014, pp. 80–84. London (UK).
[4] P. Seth, S.R. Sarangi, Internet of things: architectures, protocols, and applications, [28] K. Ma, et al., Nonvolatile processor architecture exploration for energyharvesting
J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2017 2017 (2017) 1–26. applications, IEEE Micro 35 (5) (2015) 32–40.
[5] J. Jin, J. Gubbi, S. Marusic, M. Palaniswami, An information framework for [29] E.P. de Freitas, T. Heimfarth, C.E. Pereira, Evaluation of coordination strategies for
creating a smart city through internet of things, IEEE Internet Things J. 1 (2) heterogeneous sensor networks aiming at surveillance applications, in: Proceedings
(2014) 112–121. of IEEE Sensors (SENSORS), 2009, pp. 591–596. Christchurch, New-zealand.
[6] A. Giri, S. Dutta, S. Neogy, K. Dahal, Z. Pervez, Internet of things (IoT): a survey on [30] J.M. Corchado, J. Bajo, D.I. Tapia, A. Abraham, Using heterogeneous wireless
architecture, enabling technologies, applications and challenges, in: Proceedings of sensor networks in atelemonitoring system for healthcare, IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol.
the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning, ACM, Biomed. 14 (2) (2010) 234–240.
2017, p. 7. [31] R.M. Charaan, Dilip, SMART agriculture using IoT in tropical states of India,
[7] S. Talari, M. Shafie-Khah, P. Siano, V. Loia, A. Tommasetti, J. Catalão, A review of IJARCCE 11 (2022) 297–303, https://doi.org/10.17148/IJARCCE.2022.11151.
smart cities based on the internet of things concept, Energies 10 (4) (2017) 421. [32] D. Kumar, T.C. Aseri, R.B. Patel, EEHC: energy efficient heterogeneous clustered
scheme for wireless sensor networks, Comput. Commun. 32 (2009) 662–667.