I. Comment On The Effect of Profmarg On CEO Salary. Ii. Does Market Value Have A Significant Effect? Explain
I. Comment On The Effect of Profmarg On CEO Salary. Ii. Does Market Value Have A Significant Effect? Explain
I. Comment On The Effect of Profmarg On CEO Salary. Ii. Does Market Value Have A Significant Effect? Explain
The following table was created using the data in CEOSAL2.RAW, where
standard errors are in parentheses below the coefficients:
The variable mktval is market value of the firm, profmarg is profit as a percentage
of sales, ceoten is years as CEO with the current company, and comten is total
years with the company.
iii. Interpret the coefficients on ceoten and comten. Are these explanatory
variables statistically significant?
Ceoten increase salary increase
Comten increase salary decrease
iv. What do you make of the fact that longer tenure with the company,
holding the other factors fixed, is associated with a lower salary?
Question 2
The data set 401KSUBS.RAW contains information on net financial wealth (nettfa),
age of the survey respondent (age), annual family income (inc), family size ( fsize),
and participation in certain pension plans for people in the United States. The wealth
and income variables are both recorded in thousands of dollars. For this question, use
only the data for single-person households (so fsize = 1).
i. How many single-person households are there in the data set?
Count if fsize==1
2,017
OR
iii. Does the intercept from the regression in part (ii) have an interesting
meaning? Explain.
iv. Find the p-value for the test H0: β 2 = 1 against H1: β 2 < 1. Do you reject H0
at the 1% significance level?
Question 4
What is the partial effect of expendB on voteA, holding prtystrA and expendA
fixed? What is the partial effect of expendA on voteA? Is the expected sign for
β 4 obvious?
ii. Estimate the equation in part (i) and report the results in the usual form. Is the
interaction term statistically significant?
iii. Find the average of expendA in the sample. Fix expendA at 300 (for $300,000).
What is the estimated effect of another $100,000 spent by Candidate B on
voteA? Is this a large effect?
iv. Now fix expendB at 100. What is the estimated effect of expendA = 100 on
voteA? Does this make sense?
v. Now, estimate a model that replaces the interaction with shareA, Candidate
A’s percentage share of total campaign expenditures. Does it make sense to
hold both expendA and expendB fixed, while changing shareA?
Question 5