Assignment 4
Assignment 4
Assignment 4
Assignment #4
Amal Alostaz
pg. 1
Assignment 4
realities of politics, power, and oppression when it comes to those able to access education.
freedom.
In this chapter, Freire explores many significant key terms and at times, they are laden with
much complexity and may require a bit more discussion in order to fathom their exact
meanings.
model. One of them is the dialogue, and I'd like to explain what I mean by the word
"dialogue"
Analyze what Freire means to say when he uses this term. What support does he offer to
The definition of "dialogue" has been expanded by Freire. His intellectual and spiritual
explorations of the word "dialogue" were extensive. He claimed that the word itself is the
say that words enable discourse and that they have two aspects: reflection and action. He
separated the word into two different categories: the "real" word, which "to transform the
world," and the "not real" word, which "is unable to transform reality." According to Freire,
the only genuine words that allow people to name and change the world are those that are
pg. 2
Assignment 4
1. “Dialogue is the encounter between men, mediated by the world, in order to name the
This clarifies why Freire disagrees with the idea that dialogue is merely a straightforward
method of engaging with one another in order to explore the outside world. Instead, he
thinks that discourse is a human-to-human process of learning about and altering the
world.
2. "Dialogue cannot exist, however, in the absence of a profound love … Love is at the
same time the foundation of dialogue and dialogue itself’" (Freire, 1970 & 1993,
ch.3).
This explains why, in Freire's view, communication contains "love" or, put another way,
3. “On the other hand, dialogue cannot exist without humility. The naming of the world,
through which people constantly re-create that world, cannot be an act of arrogance
4. “Faith in people is an a priori requirement for dialogue; the "dialogical man" believes
in others even before he meets them face to face’ (Freire, 1970 & 1993, ch.3)
This explains why, in Freire's view, communication cannot happen without mutual trust
pg. 3
Assignment 4
5. “Hope is rooted in men's incompletion, from which they move out in constant search
—a search which can be carried out only in communion with others’ (Freire, 1970 &
1993, ch.3) This clarifies why, in Freire's opinion, dialogue cannot take place without
hope since, without hope, there is no motivation to improve one's lot in life through
communication.
6. Finally, “true dialogue cannot exist unless the dialogue engages in critical thinking—
thinking which discerns indivisible solidarity between the world and the people and
This clarifies why, in Freire's opinion, discourse cannot take place without critical
thought. We can use reflective and autonomous thought during communication because
of critical thinking.
Freire argues that the absence of love, humility, faith, hope, and critical thinking makes
communication impossible. This describes how discourse should show off positive
interpersonal relationships and provide people the chance to change for the better in
students and teachers, communication forms the basis of the curriculum. According to
Freire, dialogue cannot take place in the absence of love, humility, faith, hope, and
critical thinking, as was already mentioned. Dialog (or dialogue) became the focal point
pg. 4
Assignment 4
"preoccupation with the content of the dialogue is really preoccupation with the program
reform, and in my opinion, it is the most delicate phase of the educational process. This
means that education is now a constant process of polite and constructive communication
between a teacher and a student rather than a one-sided view of personal reality from the
Assess the strength and validity of this term relative to what Freire is trying to
convey in this chapter. Explain whether or not you do agree with this choice of term.
I concur with Freire's views on the value of discussion in education. Even though I
had never heard of Freire's ideology before, I now completely understand it. Based on my
understand that different points of view are respected equally in this way, and oppressed
students will feel free to speak up and express their thoughts without fear.
This can only be accomplished if teachers are successful in observing their students,
identifying their themes, and gaining their respect and trust in order to initiate a
conversation. Love, humility, faith, trust, hope, and critical thinking in a conversation, in
my opinion, will help both students and teachers become proactive learners.
pg. 5
Assignment 4
References:
Freire, P. (1970, 1993). Chapter 3. In Pedagogy of the oppressed. The Continuum International
PublishingGroup. http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon2/pedagogy/pedagogychapter3.html
pg. 6