My Final Research Paper
My Final Research Paper
My Final Research Paper
1
INTRODUCTION
Scientific literacy is the ability that students must process to analyze and
apply of scientific concepts in solving daily life problems. All the aspects of
involvers the knowledgeable on basic earth science and natural history facts. As
well, as to help senior high school science teachers about their worldwide
in science but as the level of literacy is still unknown. The recognition of scientific
knowledge and skills about scientific literacy approach model by Science High
scientific literacy committed interest in science of Senior and Junior High School
Research Question:
2
What are the interesting feedback of Science High School Teachers in
This study will be conducted to the Senior High School Science Teachers
this school year 2022-2023. It is limited to their knowledge about science literacy.
This research will give benefits to High School Science Teachers. For the
learners, this will help them identify their scientific literacy. For the Administers,
this will give them feedback in providing information among the science teachers
Theoritical Framework
aspects of science and some of these competencies are acquired in the domain
which in this competitive era is one of the important abilities for individuals
SHS/JHS
(Holkbrook Science 2009).
& Rannikmae, Action plan on
Teachers Profile conducting a
seminar, trainings
ConceptualName:
Framework Scientific Literacy and science
Age: workshops on
Science
Gender: Literacy
3
Figure 1. The Conceptual Framework of the Study
strengthen their science literacy skills and knowledge about science. (Jufrida,
literacy to all individuals (Miller, 1983). While, students greatly raised through
varied style when offering evidence to back up their statements. (Chen & Liu,
2018). While, students who visit websites dedicated to science have a greater
level of scientific literacy IQ (Gu, Wang & Lin, 2019). Primarily for visual aspects
of their science teaching and such as upgrading and adopting science literacy.
(Steiner & Mendelovitch, 2019). Also the impact that experimental learning had in
shifting people’s view how energy is produced, how science knowledge is gain
continuously (Fuentes & Bloom, 2019). Such as science teachers has a positive
4
necessary to implement it (Osborn, Toole & Mckoy, 2020). The last one requires
(Yacoubian, 2018).
2019). Science and technology have improvement. They also show that they
of students to know the scientific literacy theory (Hapsari, Yuliati, Parno &
Nurhidayah, 2018). Except for the private school that feel into the poor group,
Sukarta City High School and student’s in biological scientific literacy was
extremely low (Novaristiana, Rinanto & Ramli, 2019). Thus, the knowledge and
relatively weak (Aras, Vlorensiuis, Atta & Ikhsanudin, 2020). Explored patterns of
Shavlik & Haden, 2018). Science and technology have significantly improved.
They also show that they have a better comprehension of scientific problems and
processes (Ertepinar, Ozdem & Cavas, 2013). While the impact on the
5
experimental group’s students are in low rating and high rating in scientific
literacy survey (Yuliati & Munfaridah, 2018). Except for the private school that
feel into poor group of students in biological scientific literacy was extremely low
(Dewi, 2020).
can use this learning science model (Genci, 2015). Citizen science outlines
literacy that tests a variety of talents and skills and the worldwide level. Might be
student’s likelihood of succeeding in courses that test scientific literacy skills and
knowledge capacity (Ferguson, Shaffer & Denaro, 2019). Scientific activities into
the educational process has the power to raise the general public’s level of
6
scientific literacy (Virtic, 2022). However, it influenced by two indirect factors,
including scientific attitude, which indirectly affects scientific literacy (Mahama &
using the STEM curriculum (Sertyowati, & Musadard, 2022). Therefore, the first
literacy which measures the science phenomena (Melyasari & Widodo, 2018).
Active subjects like scientific literacy that requires the process of science
literacy concept to identify which frameworks can overlap the scientific directions
literacy perspective in the light of scientific literacy topics (Yamtinah & Hastuti,
2022). The ability of scientific literacy is related to the mastery of concepts and
Methods
scientific literacy among Science Teachers for the S.Y. 2022-2023. A survey
7
questionnaire was adopted by (Shavlik, 2020) to examine scientific literacy
Formula:
8
The first highest mean rating are both statements number 5 & 6
“Scientific literacy helps the science teachers to understand the various elements
science literacy” that garnered a mean rating of 3.90 that has a descriptive rating
of strongly agree. Science teachers think that the scientific literacy helps the
scientific knowledge and skills to all science teachers to promote the various
schools have been conducted in order to improve the learning quality of science
teachers to learners. The findings demonstrated that learners that also acquired
tests the teacher’s and learner’s scientific knowledge. Prastika, Wati & Suyidno,
literacy problems.
to use scientific literacy information in daily decision making. Booth, et al. (2022).
materials with the aim of boosting scientific knowledge to all individuals. A tested
tool for enhancing and evaluating scientific literacy in college science courses.
9
They could be utilized as indicators of a student goals of succeeding in science
courses that test their scientific knowledge. Shaffer & Denaro, et al. (2019). The
The 2nd highest mean rating statement is number 8 “It is really important
rating of 3.7 that has a descriptive rating of strongly agree. It’s important to aware
all individuals about the scientific literacy’s values because we are surrounded by
technology and the products of science in our every day’s life. Science also
based on the scientific methods, scientific thoughts, scientific ideas and scientific
The government guidelines tests often focus on the middle and high
science. Beer, et al. (2008), Few things in the history of science raise more the
growth in the future. New scientific knowledge may lead to new applications.
Crease, et al. (2004), The Scientific Revolution led to the creation of the new
10
society, reading and writing skills. Science literacy is a constantly self-revising
process by which small hypotheses are tested, retested, disproved, modified and
fundamental science.
The 3rd highest mean rating statements are both number 1,2 and 9 “The
knowledge to all senior high school science teachers" and “Scientific literacy
garnered a mean rating of 3.5 that has a descriptive rating of strongly agree.
High School Science Teachers interested about scientific literacy because they
from Senior high school science teachers to students will help them examine
scientific literacy. Chen, et al. (2019), Primarily for visual aspects of their science
teaching such as upgrading and adopting science literacy to all science teachers
and students. Sharik & Booth, et al. (2022), the impact that experiential learning
Scientific literacy bringing the strongest level of knowledge by bringing all the
11
(2017), The head of the DOA provides leadership for the science literacy priority
area. The use of the test of scientific knowledge and skills is an important
knowledge.
brings the most amazing scientific facts to science teachers and learners.
Science also enables us to cope better with illness in the modern era. It also
simplified better the lives of every individuals with scientific facts. In science
history almost everyday scientists have a new invention that makes science more
interesting, safer and efficient. Denaro, et al. (2019). Alternative science makes
claim about the global warming involves and experience the world rather than
reasoning the theory of science logic (Chogluek, 2016). Having a strong basis of
scientific facts knowledge will help you understand easier the world you live in.
Some scientific facts are from scientist are the very curious people that exist in
this world. Before they make some theories and inventions they observe first and
research about their scientific thoughts, scientific ideas and scientific inventions.
Friedl, et al. (2021), The various of the scientific study of several subjects under
The fourth highest mean rating statements are both number 3 and 10
“The profile of the science teachers and their adaptation level to scientific
literacy” and "In National Science Education Standards, the content standards to
define scientific literacy" garnered a mean rating of 3.5 that has a descriptive
12
rating of strongly agree. The scientific literacy importance between the level of
say every individual can identify some local and national scientific issues.
scientific literacy adaptation. Rodger, et al. (1995), The potential for each citizen
science through science facts that you can search everywhere. Science decides
The 5th lowest mean rating statements are both number 4 and 7
“Scientist should take responsibility for bad effects to their theories and
inventions to scientific literacy” and “Scientist should take responsibility for bad
rating of 3.1 that has a descriptive rating of strongly agree. Scientist should follow
valuable standards when it comes to their research. The outcomes of their theory
or inventions it should protect also the human rights and safety protocol with their
13
theories and inventions. Scientists also provide their scientific guidelines in their
scientific activities into the educational literacy and seeks it’s connections to
science.
will adopt the scientific history of science towards to learners. We should study
the history of science literacy because it’s improved every individual’s science
history of science that teachers and learner’s adaptation in studies that develops
(2019), the point of views about the nature of science views are the best
science teachers and their opinions about science educational values in history
(Lacin-Sim, 2019).
CONCLUSION
concepts is the central goal of science literacy that promotes the science
RECOMMENDATIONS
14
1. Science teachers must develop learner’s scientific literacy knowledge.
application.
learners.
8. Scientific literacy must evolve to all learner's generations by the help of their
9. Science teachers should provide a clear insight to the students about scientific
concepts.
10. Leaners must know from their science teacher's discussions about where the
11. Science teachers must do a survey to their students about their own
12. All students and teachers must be aware to share to other individuals about
15
13. Science teachers must teach their learners about the scientific rules and
scientific facts that students can use for their future purposes.
14. Science teachers should teach their students to research more about
scientific literacy.
15. Science teachers must do their responsibility to explain step by step the
16. Students need to understand the important value of science in this world,
REFERENCES
16
Chen, S. & Liu, Y. (2018). Reinforcement of scientific literacy through effective
argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology,
14 (12), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95171
Dewi, S. & Sukarmin, S. (2020). Profile of learning process based on students
scientific literacy. Proceeding of International Conference , 8 (12),
70-83. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.121
Dolnicar, D., Podgornik, B., & Glazar, S. (2016). Does the information of
students scientific literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and
Technology, 13 (7), 69-89. https://www.ejmste.com/article/development-
of- an-android-application-in-the-form
Ertepinar, H., Ozdem, Y., & Canvas, P.H. (2013). Turkish science teacher’s
scientific literacy level. International Council of Association for Science
Education, 24 (40, 383-401. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/E51022326.pdf
Ferguson, J., Shaffer, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the test of scientific literacy
skills reveals that fundamental literacy contributor. Life Sciences
Education, 18 (3), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbc.18-12-0238
Fuentes, S. & Bloom, M. (2019). Enhancing scientific literacy program for in
service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology, 15, (6), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103571
Genci, M. (2015). The Effect Of Scientific Studies On Students Scientific Literacy
and Attitude. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty Education, 34
(1), 141-152. https://dergipark.u/akbim.gov.tr/omuefd
Gu, X., W, C., & L, L. (2019). Examining scientific literacy through new media.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 15 (12), 70-85.
https;// digital.libbrary.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadac/705556/m1/1/
Hapsari, A., Yuliati, L., Parno. & Nurhidayah, F. (2018). Building scientific literacy
and physics problem solving skills. Journal of Physics Conference, 8 (10,
20-26. https;//doi.1088/1742-6596//1108/1/012026
Hariyong, E. & Shohib, M. (2021). Scientific literacy of junior high school.
International Journal of Science Education, 2 (6), 70-89.
https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.V215.170
Jufrida, J., Basuki, F., Kurniawan, W., & Pangestu, M. (2019). Scientific literacy
and science learning achievement. International Journal of
Evaluation and Research, 8 (40), 625-630.
https://doi.org10.11591/ijere.v814.20312
Kartowigaran, B., Susantini, E., & Prastiwi, M. (2020). Effective to assess the
scientific literacy on evolution theory. International Journal of Emerging
Technology, 15 (12), 86-90. https;//doi.org/10.3991/ijet. v15i12.12227
17
Mahama, A. & Waewthongrak, W. 92022). The causal factors of scientific literacy
to student teachers. Journal of Education, 33 (20, 187-202.
https://doi.org./10.10161j.sbspro.2015.01.438
Melyasari, S. & Widodo, W. (2018). Scientific literacy skills of students and
teachers. Journal of science Education, 13 (10, 8-14. https;//doi.org.
/10/2991/snk.18.2018.30
Miller, J. (1983). Scientific literacy conceptual and imperial review. International
Journal of Storage, 12 (2), 29-48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027852
Mustikasan, C. & Phang, F. (2020). The stem model to improve scientific literacy.
Journal of STEM Fisika, 6 (2), 149-157. https;//doi.org/10.1064/50000635
Nainggolan, V.A. (2021). Improving students scientific literacy through problem-
based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Biology Indonesia. 7, (1), 71-80.
https://doi.org/1022219/jpbi.v.7i1/5220
Novaristiana, R., Rinanto, Y. & Ramloi, M. (2019). Scientific literacy profile in
biological science of high biological science. Journal of Research Gate, 1
(4), 88-99. https://doi.10.222191jpbi. V5i1.7080
Osborn, J., Toole, J. & Mckoy. (2020). Scientific literacy exercise in model
building. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 10 (80), 95-204.
https;//doi.org/10.3390/educsci/10080204
Podgornik, B. (2015). Science evolution and temporal analytics. Current Opinion
in Science, 19 (4), 215- 226. https://doi.org110.1016/j.cossms.201412.008
Powell,W. (2021). Unifying the science students for scientific literacy. Global
Journal, 6 (1), 1-19. https://doi.102018/978.1.7.99.85cho/
Queiruga-Dios, M., Inesta, E., Ojeda, M. & Saiz-Manzanares, M. & Dorrio, J.
(2020). Citizen science for scientific literacy. The Directory of Open
Access Journals, 12 (4), 42-83. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283
Ristanto, R. & Rahman, F. (2018). Learning to empower scientific literacy.
Biosfer Journal, 11 (2), 89-99. https://dpoi.1016.chiabu.2008.09
Rodger, B. (1995). Achieving scientific literacy. Scholarly Journal, 62 (7), 22-28.
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2146311067?pqorigsite=gscholar&fro
mopenview=true
Settyowati, A. & Musadard, A. (2022). Profile and factors influencing students
scientific literacy. Journal or International Conference. 5 (1), 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.32535/jicpv5i/1481.
Shavlik, M. (2022). Contributions of causal reasoning to early scientific literacy.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2 (24), 105-155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeep.2022.105509
18
Steiner, D. & Mendelovitch, M. (2017). The attitudes of science literacy. The
Learning Library, 3 (5), 82-93. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/194066
Susantini, E. (2021). The use of biology textbook to improve scientific literacy
skill. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2 (4), 444-454.
https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.
Tomcik, P. & Bellora, R. (2018). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy.
Research in Science and Technological Education, 36 (2), 226-242.
https;//doi.org.10.1080/02635/43.2017.1367656
Torres, B. & Guerrero, G. (2021). Scientific literacy of science curriculum. The
Journal of Science, 22 (2), 410- 426. https;//doi.org/10.1003/curj.141
Tuna, S. & Seckin-Kapucu, M. (2022). Analysis of high school entrance exam of
pisa scientific literacy. Journal of STEM Education, 5 (1), 31-54.
https//dergipark.org.tr. /en/pub steam/issue/68172/101838
Virtic, P. (2022). Teaching science and technology components of scientific
literacy insights. International Journal of science education, 12 (9), 19-31.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=E51350516
Yacoubian, H. (2018). Argumentation socio-scientific issues. International
Journal of Science, 40 (7), 794-807. https;//doi.org10.1080/09500693.2018
Yamtinah, S. & Hastuti, P. (2022). Scientific literacy to inquiry learning. Journal of
science Education, 6 (1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.2183//jser.V6i/48343
Yuliati, P. & Munfaridah, N. (2018). The profile of high school student’s scientific
literacy Journal of Physics Conference, 10 (13), 99-120.
https://doi.10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/1/01/2027 .
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Survey Questionnaire
19
Name:________________________ Grade & Section:________________
APPENDIX B
Pictorials
20
APPENDIX C
STATISTIC RESULT
SUMMARY
Groups Coun Sum Averag Varianc Standard
t e e Deviation
The learning and teaching methodss 10 36 3.6 0.26667
encouraged the participation of Science
Teachers to scientific literacy
Scientific literacy give the strongest 10 36 3.6 0.26667
level of science knowledge to all senior
high school science teachers
The profile of the science teachers and 10 35 3.5 0.5
their adaptation level to scientific literacy
Scientists should take responsibility for 10 31 3.1 0.76667
bad effects of their theories and
21
inventions to scientific literacy
Science literacy helps the Science 10 39 3.9 0.1
Teachers to understand the various
elements of science
The application of scientific concepts is 10 39 3.9 0.1
the central goal of science literacy
Scientific literacy adopt by Science 10 31 3.1 0.1
teachers
It is really important to produce scientific 10 37 3.7 0.23333
literacy to citizens especially to learners
Fundamental scientific facts to Science 10 36 3.6 0.26667
Teachers are necessary to know the
scientific literacy
In the National Science Education 10 35 3.5 0.27778
Standards, the content standards do
define Scientific Literacy
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 6.85 9 0.7611 2.64479 0.00914707 1.985595
2
Within Groups 25.9 90 0.2878
Total 32.75 99
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL INFORMATION
NICKNAME: Yen
BIRTHDAY: May 30, 2004
BIRTHPLACE: Butuan City
AGE: 18
22
NATIONALITY: Filipino
RELIGION: Roman Catholic
CIVIL STATES: Single
FATHER'S NAME: Ronnie P. Pacana
MOTHER'S NAME: Cembe M. Paler
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
23