Annual Risk Management Report Sample
Annual Risk Management Report Sample
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Tinkler,
Head of Audit and Risk Management
1
Contents
Section Page no
1.0 Introduction 3
2
1.0 Introduction
2.1 The Risk Management team comprises of Internal Audit, Fraud, Insurance
and the Risk Management services. The team is led by the Head of Audit
and Risk Management. The following section focuses on the Risk
Management service this is delivered by the Head of the team and the
Strategic Risk Adviser. It highlights the aims of the team and the services
that underpin these objectives.
3
framework and risk management processes;
E. Linking with the other functions within and beyond the Risk
Management team that advise on specific aspects of risk
management (e.g. insurance, health and safety, business continuity,
civil contingencies, occupational health, internal audit);
2.3 In order to meet these aims the team delivers the following services:
4
2.4 Role of the Audit Committee in supporting the risk management
process.
5
3.2 Corporate risks (strategic risks) are those concerned with ensuring overall
success of Council objectives, and the vitality and viability of the
organisation. Materialisation of such risks can have a number of
consequences, for example they could significantly affect the reputation of
the Council, or present significant financial costs. Risks are identified and
assessed by impact and likelihood on an ongoing basis across all
Directorates. Guidance has been produced to help Risk Champions (see
3.4 below) and their directorates identify corporate risks from their service
level assessments.
Significant risks are examined at directorate level and any risk that remains
Significant after existing controls are taken into account (residual risk) are
reported quarterly to the Corporate Leadership Team (CLT) so that they
can be considered further.
3.4 The Risk Champions Group is a key part of the council’s corporate risk
process. The Group is currently chaired by the Head of Audit and Risk
Management and its members comprise senior officers from each of the
directorates. The group meets monthly and its primary purpose is to ensure
that there is appropriate scrutiny of risks that have been identified by
directorates and recommended for elevation to the corporate risk register.
It also reviews and scrutinises directorate risks.
3.5 The role of a Risk Champion is set out in the group’s terms of reference
and includes the following activities:
6
Update and maintain directorate risks on JCADCORE every quarter;
Maintain close liaison on risk and risk dynamics with individual
Divisional Directors and Directorate Leadership Teams (DLT)
collectively;
Challenge officers in their directorate in their assessment of risk and
seek explanations over the proposed actions to manage the risk;
Build a risk-aware culture within their directorate and disseminate
good risk management practices;
Provide advice and assistance as required;
Obtain and update on planned actions from appropriate service
heads for reporting to CLT; and
Bring significant risks to the attention of the CLT.
3.6 Once the group have scrutinised, reviewed and updated the corporate risks
the risk management team prepare a quarterly risk management update
report for CLT and subsequently to Mayor’s Advisory Board (MAB). A
quarterly update is also presented to the Audit Committee.
3.7 Corporate risk owners continue to be invited to discuss their risk(s) with the
group to get a better understanding on how well the risk is being managed.
It may then make recommendations to the risk owner for suggested
improvements to the controls.
3.8 Risks that feature on the corporate risk register have been identified by the
corporate leadership team and also include risks that have met the
corporate risk criteria and escalated by each directorate.
3.9 The current corporate risk register (as at 01/06/18) identifies 12 corporate
risks. The definition of each of these risk ratings is set out in Appendix 4
7
(Risk Scoring Matrix).
Risk Score
Grand
Directorate 8 12 15 16 20 25 Total
HAC 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
CSD 0 1 0 2 0 2 5
Place 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Governance 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Resources 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
Grand Total 2 2 3 2 1 2 12
Compared with the same period in 2017, the numbers of corporate risks
have decreased from 13 to 12.
8
will have a new rateable value to
reflect a more up to date economic
valuation of their premises.
9
is unlawful to erect the building on a
disused burial ground, and that it
should be demolished).
(Children’s)
Risk Numbers
At the end of June there are 482 identified active risks and 843 active
controls on the Council’s risk register. To ensure risk management process
remains effective and aligned to organisational objectives, this is reviewed
quarterly by the risk team.
5.1 The Risk Management pages on THnet include information and tools on
10
managing risks which are updated regularly. Over the period more
documents have been added or revised:
11
rigorously challenged.
Accountability – appropriate risk taking behaviours rewarded and
encouraged and inappropriate behaviours challenged and
sanctioned.
Transparency – transparent and timely risk information flowing up
and down.
Risk skills – risk management skills and knowledge valued,
encouraged and developed.
Alignment with employee engagement and people strategy.
12
plan for their services.
6.3 The Council’s risk management system JCADCORE contains all recorded
risks from across the Council. Information from the risk managements
system is used to create reports for management teams and members.
7.1 This section highlights the promotional Risk Management activity which
has taken place during the reporting period.
Risk Talks
7.2 Risk talks are regular, usually monthly, lunch and learn sessions and were
initiated in May 2012. Their purpose being to bring life to Risk Management
through the use of case studies, research, sharing best practice and
updates all highlighting the importance and benefits of managing risk. The
talks are advertised on the THnet as well as targeted invitations being sent
to officers. There is usually a mixed audience of senior managers,
managers and staff. Topics have ranged from the Cyber risk landscape,
managing reputational risks, anti-fraud and corruption strategy, GDPR risk
and impact of Brexit on the local Authority.
7.3 A new programme of risks talks featuring internal and external speakers
will commence in June 2018.
8.1 This section provides evidence of the overall council performance of its
formal Risk Management arrangements. Two areas are highlighted. The
13
first is the Council’s Annual governance statement and also the result of
the council’s most recent participation in the Alarm/CIPFA Risk
Management benchmarking exercise in 2017. The evidence suggests that
the council has processes in place which continue to improve.
“All councillors and managers are responsible for ensuring threats and
opportunities are considered in the decisions they take. TH has in place a
formally approved risk management strategy which is subject to annual
review. That strategy sets out a corporate risk appetite that is not risk
averse but seeks to support decision making that consider threats,
identifies mitigations etc. in order to ensure opportunities are seized and
delivered.”
14
Benchmarking risk management
8.3 To assess and compare our “risk management health” with other
authorities the Council participates in CIPFA benchmarking exercise. It is
designed as a performance improvement tool and helping Council’s to
raise standards of risk management. The results are expected to be used
as the basis of the evidence to provide the Council with assurance of the
standard of risk management that it has reached. A summary of our
performance from our most recent participation (2017) is provided below:
Level Guide:
Awareness <20%
Happening 20 – 45%
Working
45 – 70%
Embedded &
Integrated 70 – 85%
Driving 85%
15
Table 3- LBTH Summary of Risk Management Benchmarking results
8.4 The five key risk management enablers were assessed as “Embedded &
Integrated” (4) and “Driving” (1). Our aspiration is to move all ratings to the
“driving” category and work continues on these improvement areas.
9.1 The Risk Management team plan includes a number of actions to address
some of the points above and made elsewhere in this paper:
16