Research Paper
Research Paper
Research Paper
Training Effectiveness
2
Objectives of Training Program
Preparing both the old & new employees to meet the present as well as the changing
requirements of the job & the organization.
Preventing obsolescence.
Preparing employees for the higher-level tasks.
Ensuring smooth & efficient working of the department.
Ensuring economic output of the required quality.
Imparting knowledge & skills for new entrants.
Induction.
Updating.
Classification of Training
A large variety of methods of training are used in business. Even within one organization
different methods are used for training different people. All the methods are divided into
two classifications for-
3
On-the-job Training Methods
1. Coaching: The trainee is placed under a particular supervisor who functions as a coach in
training the individuals. The supervisor provides feedback to the trainee on his performance
and offers him some suggestions for improvements. But the trainee may not have the
freedom or opportunity to express his own ideas.
2. Mentoring: The focus in this training is on the development of attitude. It is used for
managerial employees. Mentoring is always done by a senior inside person. It is also one-
to- one interaction, like coaching.
3. Job Rotation: This involves the movement of the trainee from one job to another. The
trainee receives job knowledge and gains experience from his supervisor or trainer in each
of the different job assignments. This method gives an opportunity to the trainee to
understand the problems of employees on other jobs.
4. Job Technology: This method is also known as training through step by step. The trainer
explains to the trainee the way of doing the jobs, job knowledge and skills and allows him
to do the job. The trainer appraises the performance of the trainee, provides feedback
information and corrects the trainee.
2. Vestibule Training: Actual work conditions are simulated in the classroom. Material, files
and equipment, which are used in actual job performance, are also used in training. This
type of training is commonly used for training personal for clerical and semi-skilled jobs.
Theory can be related to practice in this method.
4
a. Management Games: Properly designed games help to ingrain thinking habits,
analytical, logical and reasoning capabilities, importance of team work, time
management, to make decisions lacking complete information, communication and
leadership capabilities. Use of management games can encourage novel, innovative
mechanisms for coping with stress. Management games orient a candidate with
practical applicability of the Subject. These games help to appreciate management
concepts in a practical way. Different games are used for training general managers
and the middle management and functional heads – executive Games and functional
heads.
b. Case Study: Case studies are complex examples which give an insight into the
context of a problem as well as illustrating the main point. Case Studies are trainee
centered activities based on topics that demonstrate theoretical concepts in an
applied setting. A case study allows the application of theoretical concepts to be
demonstrated, thus bridging the gap between theory and practice, encourage active
learning, provides an opportunity for the development of key skills such as
communication, group working and problem solving, and increases the trainees”
enjoyment of the topic and hence their desire to learn.
c. Role Playing: Each trainee takes the role of a person affected by an issue and
studies the impacts of the issues on human life and/or the effects of human activities
on the world around us from the perspective of that person. It emphasizes the “real-
world” side of science and challenges students to deal with complex problems with
no single “right” answer and to use a variety of skills beyond those employed in a
typical research project. In particular, role-playing presents the student a valuable
opportunity to learn not just the course content, but other perspectives on it. The
steps involved in role playing include defining objectives, choose context & roles,
introducing the exercise, trainee preparation/research, the role-play, concluding
discussion, and assessment. Types of role play may be multiple role play, single
role play, role rotation, and spontaneous role play.
5
How to make Training Effective
Training Program can be done effectively with the help of Training Need Analysis (TNA) which
leads to identify the gaps exists between the training provided by the organization and knowledge
and skill set of trainee.
Training Need Analysis (TNA) - Training Needs Analysis (TNA) is the process in which the
company identifies training and development needs of its employees so that they can do their job
effectively. It involves a complete analysis of training needs required at various levels of the
organization.
Description - Technology is changing at a very fast pace and so are the training and development
needs of employees. It helps in grooming employees for the next level. It helps the manager to
identify key development areas of his/her employees. With proper training and development, the
productivity increases manifold.
Various companies have in-house experts who can train employees on various aspects of the
business. Normally, a calendar is worked out in advance in which various sessions are listed out
and which employees can pick their business requirement to enhance personal development needs.
At times companies also send employees for various training programs outside the organization to
train in technical know-how or a course which would be relevant to their job profile. TNA is
usually part of the appraisal process and at the end of the year an employee has to complete all the
training and development needs identified by the manager.
Training and development, which was at some point in time was not given much weightage, is
now a crucial part for any company to meet its broad goals and objectives. There are many aspects
when managers are identifying training need of their team member.
Firstly, the managers need to identify what skill set is required to complete the job or the process.
Second, is to assess existing skill levels of the team members, and lastly, determine the training
gap.
Training gap is defined as the difference between the skills required to complete the job and
existing skill set of any particular team member.
6
Training Evaluation Model (Dessler, Gary, 2019)
The Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model was Donald Kirkpatrick, to define the four levels of training
evaluation. The four levels of evaluation are Reaction, Behaviour, Learning and Result. Each of the
four levels is explained below.
Level 1 – Reaction
Level 1 solicits opinions of the learning experience following a training event or course. Typical
questions concern the degree to which the experience was valuable (satisfaction), whether they felt
engaged, and whether they felt the training was relevant. Training organizations use that feedback
to evaluate the effectiveness of the training, students’ perceptions, potential future improvements,
and justification for the training expense.
Level 2 – Learning
Level 2 measures the degree to which participants acquired the intended knowledge, skills and
attitudes as a result of the training. This level is used by instructors and training executives to
determine if training objectives are being met. Only by determining what trainees are learning, and
what they are not, can organizations make necessary improvements.
Level 3 – Behaviour
Level 3 measures the degree to which participants’ behaviors change as a result of the training –
basically whether the knowledge and skills from the training are then applied on the job. This
measurement can be, but is not necessarily, a reflection of whether participants actually learned
the subject material. For example, the failure of behavioral change can be due to other
circumstances such as individual’s reluctance to change.
Level 4 – Results
Level 4 seeks to determine the tangible results of the training such as: reduced cost, improved
quality and efficiency, increased productivity, employee retention, increased sales and higher
morale. While such benchmarks are not always easy or inexpensive to quantify, doing so is the
only way training organizations can determine the critical return on investment (ROI) of their
training expenditures. One typical challenge is to identify whether specific outcomes are truly the
result of the training.
7
The Four Levels
As part of succession planning to help an employee be eligible for a planned change in role
in the organization.
To "pilot", or test, the operation of a new performance management system to train about
a specific topic.
8
General benefits from Training and Development
There are numerous sources of online information about training and development. Several of
these sites (they're listed later on in this library) suggest reasons for supervisors to conduct training
among employees. These reasons include:
Enhanced company image, e.g., conducting ethics training (not a good reason for ethics
training!).
A range of delivery methods are offered by the leading retail store to provide the relevant and most
effective training solution in the most cost effective manner. These are as follows-
1. Classroom Trainings & Seminars – The participants/ employees congregate at one place
where the training is imparted to them by the means of lectures and activities.
3. Use of Technology‐ The use of technology for imparting knowledge to the employees is
encouraged by the stores. Various technological tools, such as Web Ex, Learning Videos
and Movies are utilized to provide the information & knowledge from Home Office to
Zonal Offices and to various Stores and vice versa.
9
4. Store Guru ‐ Store Gurus are responsible to deliver training on Process Excellence and
Product Knowledge in the Store and help store Karta’s to turn the store into a Centre of
excellence for retail knowledge and skills, and building self-sufficiency at the store level.
Not only has this mode of learning extremely cost effective but also enhances employee
engagement and motivation to a great extent within the environment of the store.
5. On Job Training – Some aspects of a job are best understood while actually performing
it. Retail stores promotes the practice of Unnati – On the Job learning simultaneously while
working to facilitate employees to understand and gain the knowledge skills and attitude
required to perform the given task at hand in the most effective manner.
6. Coaching & Mentoring – The store realizes the importance of achieving business goals
through coaching and mentoring initiatives. The organization encourages a culture of
coaching and mentoring for personal growth and professional development. Coaching and
mentoring is a process that enables learning and development to impact performance
positively. Various methods and styles are used in the most appropriate manner to bring
out effective professional and personal development of the employees.
7. Time Bound Learning and Growth Plan –Employees in the stores form the backbone of
its business and the group realizes the importance of training and developing them
completely. Avatar ‐ A Time bound learning and growth plan for every role holder in the
store is run by the stores in Future Learning and Development Centre (FLDC). This 72
month learning program is to enable a team member become a Store Karta.
10
Store Manager identifies the Training need of the employees
in the store
11
LITERATURE REVIEW
Reference Grid of papers reviewed for Training Program Effectiveness.
The aim of this literature review is to make connections between the different studies, to help
evaluate the state of knowledge in the field of Training Effectiveness as a whole. The introduction
section highlighted the various concepts of Effectiveness of Training program. The literature
review aims to examine the important variables which affect the effectiveness of Training program
at workplace.
A concerned study (Ahmad, A. I. & Adamu, M., 2015) is aimed at determining the relationship
between training effectiveness and employee performance, as well as examining the mediating
role of work environment. The evaluation of a training program in an organization is an ongoing
process. Following the completion of a training program, and it's subsequent application on the
job, then it is worthy to be followed by an evaluation to ascertain the effect of the training received
by the employee on the job they performed. Present scenario of business world is characterized by
a growing competitiveness, market globalization, and technological advances in organizations.
The survival of an organization implies the prosecution of sustainable competitive advantage
(Barney and Wright, 2008).Many researchers have conducted a lot of researches in order to
evaluate the training program from the point of views of multiple factors and dimensions, (Wright,
(2006), Richard et al. (2000), Ibrahim et al. (2008), Baldwin, (2008), Mike, (2010), and Burke
(2006). This is done for the purpose of ensuring that the skills learned during trainings are equally
utilized on the jobs performed by the employees. This becomes imperative because the essence of
acquiring training is to transfer it, or to apply it to the tasks and jobs performed by an employee.
This, if properly conducted, would result in both the attainment of individual and organizational
goals, and hence, the success of the organization.
Focus of study
This study is aimed at determining the relationship between training effectiveness and employee
performance, as well as examining the mediating role of work environment.
12
Methodology
The methodology used in this study is a quantitative research technique. Questionnaires were used
in this survey as instrument for data collection. In analyzing the results from the instrument,
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used as a tool to analyze the data. Inferential
statistics was used using Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis. Sobel Test was
also conducted to confirm the degree of mediation effect of the mediating variables. The findings
revealed that there is a positive relationship between training effectiveness (Kirkpatrick Four
Levels) and employee performance.
Limitations
This research concentrated only on training effectiveness as an independent variable, and work
environment as a mediating variable, while employee performance as a dependent variable.
The current study addresses these two questions by Meta analytically summarizing leadership
training research. In the examination of the factors that contribute to leadership training program
effectiveness, it has offered several contributions to the science of leadership development and
training. First, the current study provides a meta-analytic estimate of the effectiveness of leadership
training across a wide span of years (1951–2014) and organizations. it is noted that this literature
has been previously meta-analyzed however, the Burke and Day (1986) meta-analysis, which is
arguably the most comprehensive meta-analytic investigation of leadership training to date, only
included studies published through 1982, which excludes the majority of available leadership
training studies.
Focus of study
To provide data-driven recommendations for effective leadership training programs that are based
on a Meta analytic investigation. To answer the questions a. how effective are leadership training
programs?
b. How should one design, deliver, and implement a leadership training program to maximize effectiveness?
13
Methodology
The current study examines 15 moderators of leadership training program effectiveness that will
provide those who develop leadership training programs a comprehensive understanding of how
to design, deliver, and implement effective programs. Lastly, the current study makes use of
updated meta-analytic techniques when combining across study designs to accommodate different
types of primary study designs (Morris & DeShon, 2002). One exception to this is the meta-
analytic investigation by Taylor however, this study only evaluated training transfer and did not
include trainee reactions, learning, or results as outcomes. Using these updated techniques results
in a more accurate estimate of the effect of leadership training, and also allows for stronger causal
inferences than typical, cross sectional meta- analyses (because all the studies included in the
meta-analysis are either repeated measures or experimental designs).
Limitations
ii. It is noted that ineffective leadership training programs might also be disproportionately
excluded from unpublished work (i.e., organizations with ineffective programs do not give
researchers access to data about the effectiveness of these programs). Thus, despite a lack
of publication bias evident in the current article, our results may still be upwardly biased
because our meta-analytic database can only reflect existing studies, which are more likely
to have been conducted on effective rather than ineffective training programs.
14
3. European Journal of Training and Development (Alvelos, R. & Ferreira,
A.I.)
Introduction
This study aims to demonstrate the extent to which social support influences the motivation to
improve work through learning. Social support appears as a variable that media test the relationship
between the independent variables of perceived content validity and transfer design with the
dependent variable of motivation to improve work through learning. In contemporary professional
milieus, where increasing economic and social uncertainty and unpredictability prevail,
organizations aim to increase their productivity and maintain their competitiveness on a consistent
basis (London and Moore,1999;MatosandLopes,2008).In view of these continuous emerging
Challenges, managers tend to cope and maintain high levels of quality control by focusing on the
acquisition of new knowledge and skills (Caetano, 2007; vanEerdeetal. 2008) through strategic
training which assumes a key role for any organization.
Focus of study
To understand the factors that affect training effectiveness. (i-e Social support, perceived content
validity, transfer design, the motivation to improve work through learning and positive transfer,
contribute to the effectiveness of training.)
Methodology
Instruments Data were collected through a self-report measure with a five- point Likert scale (1
“strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”). Cronbach’s alphas were calculated as a measure of
internal consistency. Participants were invited to answer according to the last training they
participated in the company. The questionnaire included socio-demographic variables to measure
gender, age, educational background and seniority.
Limitations
Pertaining to the use of a single measuring instrument. Thus, the internal validity of the study can
be affected by variance from the common method. Size and representativeness. Sample was
collected by convenience, which represents socio-demographic and organizational specificities.
Thus, results obtained in the present study cannot be generalized to other organizational realities.
15
Research Gaps
Based on the above Literature Review, following are the gaps which are identified:
2. Kirkpatrick Model - The Kirkpatrick Model is probably the best known model for
analyzing and evaluating the results of training programs. The model is composed of four
levels: reaction, learning, behavior and outcome.
1. To explore the factors of training evaluation and check which factors are significant in
determining the training for the employees.
a. Broad objectives
The main objective of this report is to gain practical knowledge of training and development
program followed in an organization. The following are the other objectives of this report.
b. Specific Objectives
i. To analyse which are the most important factors that affect Training Program.
ii. To understand the attitude of employees towards Training and development program.
Research Methodology
The objectives of the study have been formulated on the basis of gaps found in the literature review.
Research methodology is designed in a way so that it helps to achieve the objectives of the study.
In the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences,( D. Slesinger and M. Stephenson 1930) defined research
as “the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of generalizing to extend,
correct or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids in the construction of theory or in the
practice of an art”.
16
The actual information provided in this report will be collected from two different sources, namely
primary and secondary source. The major components of research methodology are:
It is very necessary to select an appropriate and specific research design before the actual
research work is started. This study is a descripted research where the objectives are clearly
defined and details about all aspects of problem are collected. Regardless of the problem’s
complexity, it is important to design this conclusive research efficiently so that it forms the
basis for an analytical study that would enable us to develop hypothesis.
The study consists of usage of Likert’s scale for measuring the variables. Some of the
variables like, reputation, location, emoluments, knowledge and skill set available consist of
a series of statements where the respondents have to provide answers in the form of
agreement or disagreement. So, the respondent needed to select a numerical score (like 1 or
2 or 3 or 4 or 5) for each statement to indicate the degree of agreement or otherwise. Each
score has to be finally added up to measure the respondent’s attitude.
Survey
It is a research technique which is used to gather information from a sample of respondents
by employing a questionnaire to obtain primary data. It is the data which is gathered first
hand to answer the research question being investigated. Surveys are done depending on the
objectives formulated. It is basically used for collecting data from a pre-defined group of
respondents to gain more insights into our topic of interest.
17
Description of the Questionnaire
The questionnaire has been prepared on the basis of the variables identified in the Literature
review. It is provided in the Appendix 1.
Behavior
Reaction
Learning
Outcome
Part A contains the questionnaire regarding the expectations you had before attending the training
program.
Part B contains the questionnaire regarding the experience you have developed after attending the
training program.
Analysis
1) Reliability Analysis
When the outcome of a measuring process is reproducible and the scale provides stable
measures at different times under different conditions, it is termed as Reliability. An analysis
has been conducted for checking the reliability of the questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alpha (a
measure of reliability) has been calculated for the model separately. These coefficients are
expected to indicate reliability as they ought to meet the minimum acceptable level of 0.6
(Hair et al., 2007). The details are indicated in Chapter IV.
2) Factor Analysis
18
with that, it is also necessary to identify new factors to replace the original set of correlated
variables in regression analysis. Thus, factor analysis is needed for all models in this study.
Bartlett’s test of sphericity has been used to test the null hypothesis that the variables are
uncorrelated in the population through a Chi-square statistic. The factor analysis would be
called appropriate if the null hypothesis is rejected. Along with that, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
(KMO) measure of sampling adequacy has also been tested through an index. Generally, a
value greater than 0.5 is desirable for concluding that factor analysis is appropriate. The steps
involved in conducting factor analysis (Malhotra & Dash, 2009) are as follows:
Step Two: Correlation Matrix: A correlation matrix shows simple correlations between
all possible pairs of variables included in the analysis. The diagonal elements which are
all 1 are usually omitted. An identity matrix should have all diagonal terms as 1 and all
off diagonal terms as 0. The following is the formulation of Hypothesis.
Step Three: Method of Factor Analysis: The factor analysis has been conducted
through a method called as Principal-components method as it explains more variance
than would the loadings (values that explained how closely the variables were related to
19
each one of the factors discovered) obtained from any other method of factoring. Only in
case of principal component analysis is it possible to compute exact factor scores and
these scores are uncorrelated with each other. The factor scores can be used instead of the
original variables in subsequent multivariate analysis.
Step Four: Determine the number of factors: While determining the number of factors,
it is essential to summarize the information contained in the original variables so that a
smaller number of factors should be extracted. An eigen value represents the total
variance explained by each factor. In eigen value approach, only factors with eigen value
greater than 1 are retained and other factors are not included in the model. Thus, the number of
factors has been determined on the basis of eigen values. It is recommended that the factors
extracted should account for at least 60 percent of the variance. The total variance explained is
the percentage of total variance which can help in understanding how well the factors are able to
summarize the data.
Step Five: Rotation of factors: The un-rotated component matrix describes the
relationship between variables and factors. However, it cannot help in interpreting the
factors effectively because many variables are related with many factors thereby creating
a need to simplify the matrix to interpret the factors. The rotation of the component matrix
was done to attain a technically simple structure. Varimax rotation was used to maximize
the variance of the loadings within each factor to simplify the columns in the factor
analysis. It helps in developing clearer factor loading patterns with some variables having
high loadings on a particular factor and other variables having a loading nearer to zero.
Thus, it facilitates to interpret the factors in a different way.
Step Six: Interpretation of factors: The results of Varimax rotation are summarized in
this step.
3) Multiple Regression
20
which are described in Chapter IV. After conducting this regression, it was found that some
independent variables considered in the study turned out not to be significant. When there
are large numbers of independent variables and the researcher suspects that not all of them
are significant, stepwise regression may be used. The purpose of stepwise regression is to
select, from a large number of predictor variables, a small subset of variables that account
for most of the variation in the dependent or criterion variable. It can be useful when the
sample size is large in relation to the number of predictors (Malhotra & Dash, 2009). Thus,
stepwise regression has also been used for all the models to clear the doubt regarding the
significance of independent variables.
The multiple regression model involves more than one independent variable to estimate the
dependent variable. The major benefit of this analysis is that it allows the use of the
information available from the factors derived in factor analysis, to estimate the dependent
variable with greater accuracy. The three components that summarize the multiple regression
analysis are Coefficient of Determination (R Square), ANOVA (Regression as a whole) and
Regression Coefficients (Beta Coefficients) (Levin & Rubin, 2002). The usual procedure in
a stepwise regression analysis is to enter or remove variables at each step on the basis of
testing whether certain partial correlation coefficients are zero. The following are the
components of a multiple regression:
ANALYSIS OF DATA
The research methodology described in chapter III highlighted the various research methods used
in the study. The various parameters, terminologies and variables defined in the research
methodology had to be inspected, cleaned (making it error-free) and transformed to a suitable
format. Thus, the sector-wise analysis of data has been carried out with reference to the objectives
of the study as defined in chapter II and research methodology described in chapter III to highlight
useful information, suggest conclusion and support decision making. All the statistical tables have
22
been given in sequential order in this chapter. However, final models of stepwise regression tables
have been incorporated in this chapter and the complete stepwise regression tables have been given
below. The minimum number of responses required should be five times the number of variables
(Malhotra & Dash, 2009). Hence, the break-up of the minimum number of responses has been
given in Table 1 as follows:
Table 1
Minimum responses required for Factor Analysis
Analysis Number of metric Minimum number of responses
variables required (Number of Variables*5)
(Malhotra & Dash,2009)
Effectiveness of Training & 10 50
Development
Total 10 50
Reliability Analysis
The survey questionnaire had to be tested for its reliability. An analysis was conducted for
checking the reliability of the questionnaire and the results were obtained. The Cronbach’s
alpha (a measure of reliability) score has been calculated for all the analyses. The results
have been summarized in Table 2 as mentioned below. The values of Cronbach’s alpha
above 0.6 indicate that there is internal consistency in the data.
23
Table 2
Cronbach’s alpha score
Reliability Statistics
0.682 7
Factor Analysis
Step One: According to the questionnaire the following are the variables used in this
analysis: Facilities, Confident, Content, Boost, Subject & Useful.
Step Two: Null Hypothesis: Variables are uncorrelated in the population (The
population correlation matrix is an identity matrix). From Table 3, the Approx. Chi-
Square value is 135.199 and it has found to be significant which indicates that the null
hypothesis can be rejected and it may be concluded that variables are correlated in the
population. The chi-square statistic is used only for Bartlett’s test of sphericity and its
value will help in concluding whether the variables are correlated or not. The Kaiser-
Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of Sampling Adequacy is found out to be 0.504 which
indicates that factor analysis is appropriate.
Step Three: The factor analysis has been conducted through a method called as Principal-
components method.
Step Four: Determine the number of factors: It is observed from Table 4, that the total
24
variance explained is 63.627%.
Table 4
25
Step Six: Interpretation of factors: The results of Varimax rotation are summarized in
Table 6:
Factor 1: The following are the variables (Item numbers 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 from the Questionnaire)
that have the highest loading on factor 1 after rotation. This factor has been named as Official
Factors as all the variables are related to the workplace.
Factor 2: The following are the variables (Item Numbers 3, and 4 from the Questionnaire) that
have the highest loading on factor 2 after rotation. This factor has been named as Other Factors.
Multiple Regression
A multiple regression analysis was used to obtain the results. The results of the factor
analysis (F1, and F2) were carried forward by which all the independent variables (F1 and F2)
were used to predict the dependent variable by multiple regression. The regression equation
(Levin & Rubin, 2002) is as follows: Y=α+β1F1+β2F2
Where Y= Mean (Mean of the three variables namely No. of applicants, No. of hiring and
No. of successful placements
α= Intercept.
F1 = Official Factors
F2 = Other Factors
26
β1, β2 = Slopes associated with F1, F2
Model Summary
Table 8
F-test - ANOVA
Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 2.181 3 .727 2.949 .042b
Residual
11.339 46 .247
Total
13.520 49
It can be concluded from the above tables indicate that null hypothesis can be rejected and thus
Y depends on at least one of the Fi‘s.
27
Inference about an individual slope (β)
Null Hypothesis: Fi is not a significant explanatory variable i.e. H0: βi=0
Alternate Hypothesis: Fi is a significant explanatory variable i.e. H1: βi ≠0
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 2.323 .956 42.429 .019
REGR factor
score 1 for .259 .096 .368 2.694 .010
analysis 1
REGR factor
score 2 for .190 .132 .197 1.441 .156
analysis 1
Y= 2.323 + 0.259 F1
It can be concluded from the above tables that null hypothesis can be rejected and F1, is significant
explanatory variable.
Thus, recruitment and selection decision depends on the variables (F1 and F2) as mentioned above.
The coefficient of (multiple) determination (R2) is 0.162 and the F-ratio is found to be 4.246, which
is significant. Thus, one can conclude that regression model is significant to explain the recruitment
and selection.
28
Conclusions and Discussions
The objective conclusion obtained on the basis of the research objectives derived in chapter II,
research methodology stated in chapter III and analyses of data described in chapter IV are as
follows:
Objective
A) To explore the factors of training evaluation and check which factors are significant in
determining the training for the employees.
Conclusion
The factors extracted in this analysis is Official Factors. The training and development
decision depends on these Official Factors. It indicates that the Kirkpatrick Model levels that
is Reaction, Learning, Behavior & Outcome affects Training and development procedure in
the firm.
Managerial Implications
1. The results have helped to understand the concepts of training and development. This may
help the manager to understand the techniques which are beneficial and which are not.
2. The analysis have revealed the main reasons that affect the training program procedure in
retail store. This may help the manager to plan training and development process more
effectively.
29
Limitations
The results obtained in this study are subject to some limitations as mentioned below:
Since the responses were recorded on a Likert scale, there were no available means to
verify the accuracy of the data collected. Thus, it was assumed that the data was error free.
Being a large organization, the flow of information was not appropriate according to the
requirement.
Secrecy and Confidentiality has been maintained for revealing for the exact names of the
Training methods.
30
Appendix
QUESTIONNAIRE
On a scale of (1) Strongly disagree (2) Disagree (3) Neither agree nor disagree (4) Agree (5)
Strongly agree, please circle (O) the appropriate rating.
1. Training goals and objectives clearly stated before you started the course.
1 234 5
10. Training has boost your morale and increased retention period in the company.
1 234 5
Signature
31
References
o Garry Dessler (2019). Human Resource Management- 15th ed. Pearson Education India.
o Kirkpatrick, Donald. And James. 2008. Evaluating training programs, Tata McGraw-Hill
Publishing Company limited. 3rd edition.
o Cole, N. 2007. How long should a training program be? A field study of “rules-of- thumb”.
Journal of Workplace Learning, 20 (1), 54-70.
o Ahmad, A.I.H. & Adamu, M., 2015. The relationship between training effectiveness and
employee performance: mediating role of work environment. Faculty of Cognitive Science
and Human development University Malaysia Sarawak.
o Burke, M. J., & Day, R. R., 2004. Burke, M. J., & Day, R. R., 2004.Human resource
development quarterly.
o Rita Alvelos Aristides I Ferreira Reid Bates , (2015),"The mediating role of social support
in the evaluation of training effectiveness", European Journal of Training and
Development, Vol. 39 Iss 6 pp. 484 - 503
o Levin, R. & Rubin, D. (2002). Statistics for Management. Prentice Hall of India
32
Private Limited. India.
33
34