Casella
Casella
Casella
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Musical Times Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The Musical Times
at all, and doubtless there are certain entire musical language of the 19th century. Nor
trustworthy
memoranda still extant consisting is of
it less evident that
violent the exploitation of this
articles
in which one of the most famous of Parisian critics chord reaches its culminating point in Debussy, and
eloquently maintained that Ravel plagiarised afterwards rapidly dies away.
Debussy. A like mishap has since befallen other Still, in conformity with the law of human evolution,
musicians ; there are some even now whom criti- which governs the formation of successive cycles, a
cism for long years has delighted in depicting asstudy of the 19th century shows us, along with the
honourable successors of Stravinskyor of Sch6nberg, magnificent expansion of the chord of the major
though manifestly quite different from them. ninth in Wagner and Debussy, the gradual elaboration
Nevertheless there is no error-or even stupidity of the following harmonic concept, i.e., of the
-that does not contain at least some element of
truth. And in the Debussy-Ravel affair we can eleventh harmonic the first traces of which
now readily discern that while the personalities of
both musicians are fundamentally divergent, and
quite as impossible to confuse as those of Schumann are actually to be seen in Mozart.
and Mendelssohn, it is nevertheless evident that Truth to tell, we find in Debussy frequent
both had identical predilections as regards the allusions to this harmonic. Nevertheless, Debussy
past. And the essential. trait that unites the two still remains the exponent of the major ninth. And
creators is that they altogether repudiated the tire-
it is only in Ravel that the new chord is finally used
some and ridiculous burden of a philosophico-in a constant, conscious, and spontaneous manner-
musical Wagnerism, and, instead, returned to a more for while his early works still contain such rare
Latin conception ofmusic. Both revered Mozart examples of the major ninth as:
and Chopin ; they were ardent admirers of the
Russian influence and faithful friends of Chabrier. Ex..'.
In short, they remained stubbornly opposed to the
post-Wagnerian Franckist movement, which, by
reason of its Germanic and Flemish origins, was at AliY
the I8th century ; and mention only the ' Gibet,' entirely built up round an
inverted pedal for forty-eight bars, and containing
this amazing passage
Ex.7.
The former has supplied Ravel with splendid
possibilities, as in the passage
Ex. 3.
Ex.54.
- ; -I F .....UI a U