0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views1 page

1752

This solution shows that the matrix exponential of a matrix A, e^A, can be expressed as the exponential of the trace of A. It does this by first showing that the matrix M(t) = e^J(λ,r)t satisfies the properties needed for it to equal the matrix exponential. It then notes that every matrix is similar to a Jordan normal form matrix. Using properties of determinants and traces, it expresses the determinant of the matrix exponential in terms of the traces of the Jordan blocks, and thus the trace of the original matrix A.

Uploaded by

Richard Feynman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views1 page

1752

This solution shows that the matrix exponential of a matrix A, e^A, can be expressed as the exponential of the trace of A. It does this by first showing that the matrix M(t) = e^J(λ,r)t satisfies the properties needed for it to equal the matrix exponential. It then notes that every matrix is similar to a Jordan normal form matrix. Using properties of determinants and traces, it expresses the determinant of the matrix exponential in terms of the traces of the Jordan blocks, and thus the trace of the original matrix A.

Uploaded by

Richard Feynman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Solution (#1752) If we set  

1 t t2 /2! · · · tr−1 /(r − 1)!


 .. .. 

 0 1 t . . 

λt  .. 
M(t) = e  0 0 1 . t2 /2! ,
 
 .... .. .. 
 . . . . t 
0 ··· 0 0 1
then M(0) = I and M ′ (t) equals
   
1 t t2 /2! · · · tr−1 /(r − 1)! 0 1 t · · · tr−2 /(r − 2)!
 .. ..   .. .. 
 0 1
 t . . 

 0 0
 1 . . 

λt  . ..  λt  . .. 
λe  0 0 1 t2 /2! +e  0 0 0 t ,
   
 . . .. ..   . .. .. .. 
 .. .. . . t   .
. . . . 1 
0 ··· 0 0 1 0 ··· 0 0 0
 
λ λt + 1 λt2 /2! + t · · · λtr−1 /(r − 1)! + tr−2 /(r − 2)!
 .. .. 
 0
 λ λt + 1 . . 

 .. 
= eλt  0 0 λ . 2
λt /2! + t 
 
 . . . . 
 .. .. .. .. λt + 1 
0 ··· 0 0 λ1
  2 
λ 1 0 ··· 0 1 t t /2! · · · tr−1 /(r − 1)!
 .. .  .. .. 
 0 λ
 1 . ..  
 0 1 t . . 

 ..   .. 
= eλt  0 0 λ . 0  0 0 1 . t 2
/2!  = J(λ, r)M (t)
  
 . . . .  . . . . 
 .. .. .. . . 1   .. .. .. .. t 
0 ··· 0 0 λ 0 ··· 0 0 1
as required. Hence eJ(λ,r)t = M (t). Note then that we have
r
det eJ(λ,r) = eλ = eλr = etraceJ(λ,r) .
Now by #1079 every matrix A is similar to one in Jordan normal form. So there exists invertible P such that
P −1 AP = diag (J(λ1 , r1 ), J(λ2 , r2 ), . . . , J(λk , rk )) .
Then
det eA = det(P −1 eA P ) [by the product rule for determinants]
P −1 AP
= det e [by #1746]
= det diag eJ(λ1 ,r1 ) , eJ(λ2 ,r2 ) , . . . , eJ(λk ,rk ) [by #1744]
J(λ1 ,r1 ) J(λ1 ,r1 ) J(λ1 ,r1 )
= det e × det e × · · · × det e [by #820]
= etraceJ(λ1 ,r1 ) × etraceJ(λ2 ,r2 ) × · · · × etraceJ(λk ,rk )
= exp [traceJ(λ1 , r1 ) + traceJ(λ2 , r2 ) + · · · + traceJ(λk , rk )]
= exp trace P −1 AP
= exp traceA [by the trace product rule].

You might also like