0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views5 pages

Self-Assessment Physics IA

This document contains a self-assessment of coursework. It evaluates performance based on criteria of personal engagement, exploration, and analysis of a research topic. Overall grades are given for each criterion, with questions answered to indicate if expectations were met. Areas examined include justification of topic choice, research methodology, data collection and processing, graphing techniques, and evaluation of results.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views5 pages

Self-Assessment Physics IA

This document contains a self-assessment of coursework. It evaluates performance based on criteria of personal engagement, exploration, and analysis of a research topic. Overall grades are given for each criterion, with questions answered to indicate if expectations were met. Areas examined include justification of topic choice, research methodology, data collection and processing, graphing techniques, and evaluation of results.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

COURSEWORK

SELF-ASSESSMENT

Ø "PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT" CRITERION - Overall grade: 1 2

YES NO
The topic choice is justified with significance, interest or curiosity (e.g.: I wonder
X
why…) and enthusiasm in report style is evident.
The research question is novel/new/unusual and / or relevant to a local or global issue
X
and links to a potential solution.
The design of the investigation is your own and include some personal input even if X
based on prior research.
An innovative approach is used to answer the research question even if based on
prior research because it does not repeat it (i.e.: the investigation as yours cannot be
X
found on the Internet nor in a book).

Ø "EXPLORATION" CRITERION - Overall grade: 1 2 3 4 5 6

How do I introduce my research problem? YES NO

The title I have chosen gives a clear and concrete idea of the work I do. X
I have introduced the research topic I am going to develop the research
X
question about.

The objective and / or research question is clear and relates to the work I have done.
X

I have justified why I have chosen that research question. X

The dependent variable (what I measure) is clearly defined, including units. X

The independent variable (what I manipulate) is clearly defined, including units. X


I clearly state all the relevant controlled variable(s)
X
(controlled variable is one that can affect what I measure).

How do I describe the working method? YES NO

I explain why I use this research method. X

If the method is not mine, I quote the sources of where I got it. X
I include a list of absolutely all the material used, indicating its dimensions, X
material, uncertainty, maximum range, etc.
I present a clear methodology that shows the detailed way of measuring (quantifying) X
the dependent variable, step by step.

I indicate how the independent variable varies. X


I indicate how I control the variables that might affect the dependent variable but that
X
are outside of my study.

I include a diagram of set up that clarifies the method described, if necessary. X


COURSEWORK SELF-ASSESSMENT

Ø "ANALYSIS" CRITERION - Overall grade: 1 2 3 4 5 6

How do I collect the data? YES NO


I have collected all the raw data and the observations (qualitative data) relevant
X
to my method.
I have varied the independent variable enough to be able to answer my
X
research question.
I collected enough quantitative data of the dependent variable for the different values X
of the independent variable.

I have included the appropriate units for all measurements. X

I have included the corresponding uncertainty for all measures. X


The number of significant figures that I have used is adequate for each measure, that
is, the uncertainty and the measurement are consistent in terms of the number of X
significant figures.

For anyone who reads this research, it is clear what each collected data represents. X
If I present a table with the data obtained, I included the table number, title, columns
with appropriate headings. X
(Ex: title of the header with the appropriate units and uncertainties)

How do I process the data? YES NO


I have chosen the correct way to process the data (calculations, graphs,
X
statistical measurements...)
If I have made graphics I have reviewed the list "If I have made a graph..."
X
(check below)
The data processing leads me to fulfil my objective and / or answers my research X
question.

I have correctly propagated the uncertainties X

Can I extract from the data obtained a valid and detailed conclusion that answers my
X
research question?


COURSEWORK SELF-ASSESSMENT

If I made a graph... YES NO

Have I indicated the graph number and what it represents? X

Does my graphic have a title that clearly expresses the variables that I represent? X

Have I expressed on each axis what magnitude I represent and its units? X

Have I chosen an appropriate scale for the axes showing also the origin?
X

I have included legends when necessary?


X
(e.g.: colours, icons, etc. when several graphics are presented in one)

Do error bars appear in my graph or, if they are not relevant, do I indicate why? X

Have I drawn the line of best fit, if it is the case, and its equation if relevant? X
Have I indicated the coefficient that indicates the goodness of the adjustment if this
X
has been done?
Is the printing of the graphic of enough quality for anyone to understand without
X
difficulty?

Ø “EVALUATION” CRITERION - Overall grade: 1 2 3 4 5 6

YES NO
I make a coherent interpretation of the results obtained by analysing the data
X
and / or graphs, and then I draw a detailed conclusion.

The conclusion answers my objective and / or research question. X

The conclusion is based on the interpretation of the results, not on assumptions.


X

I argue my conclusion with the theories and physical concepts studied and / or that I X
exposed in the research topic.
I compare my experimental results, if it is the case, with theoretical data and I quote
X
the sources of the latter.
If I think it is relevant, I mention secondary conclusions that complement my research
X
question.

I value the limitations of my data X

I identify random and / or systematic errors and their sources. X

In the case of systematic errors, I explain how they affected my result. X

I evaluate the effect of uncertainties in my conclusion. X


COURSEWORK SELF-ASSESSMENT
I evaluate the method that I followed in my research (limitations and influence of
X
these).
I identify if the errors / weak points justify the values obtained (and its variation with
X
respect to the published value if it is the case).
I evaluate if the number of data collected in practice has been sufficient to give a
good conclusion (possibility of having made several repetitions, enough data, in X
graphics, etc.)

I suggest modifications to improve each one of the weak points. X

My suggestions are realistic, clear, specific and achievable. X


I detail each improvement that I propose and I indicate how it would influence the
X
result.
I suggest how to expand my research or propose future investigations that could be
X
done after mine.

Ø “COMMUNICATION” CRITERION - Overall grade: 1 2 3 4


YES NO

My report is well structured (e.g.: title, headings, etc.). X


rd
Impersonal and consistent report style used (e.g.: passive/3 person). X

Tables and graphs do not break across pages.


X

I have mentioned in the bibliography section at the end of the report .all the sources X
where I have taken information from.

The ideas I have expressed have been relevant and concise X


All the images, graphs, data, tables and background information is relevant to the
research question.

The report is 6-12 pages (without including annexes). X

The report is easy to read and “flows”. X

The use of excess jargon in avoided. X

Non-standard technical terms are explained are explained and used properly. X

I have reviewed all the aspects referred to in the previous criteria. X

Ø PERSONAL SATISFACTION (NOT A ASSESSED CRITERION ITSELF)


YES NO
After analysing all these aspects, are you satisfied in general with the research
X
you have done?
COURSEWORK SELF-ASSESSMENT

You might also like