Making inferences requires using logic to draw conclusions based on evidence and prior knowledge. The key aspects of making an inference are considering all available details, understanding the full context, and ensuring conclusions are supported by evidence rather than assumptions. However, inferences are not always straightforward as information can be incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory. The role of context is also important, as the meaning of words depends on their usage. There are three main types of logical reasoning used for inferences: deductive reasoning draws a specific conclusion from a general statement through examination of possibilities; inductive reasoning forms general conclusions from specific examples; and abductive reasoning develops the most probable explanation for observations through educated guesses. Overall, making accurate inferences is a complex process integrating multiple sources
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views1 page
Document
Making inferences requires using logic to draw conclusions based on evidence and prior knowledge. The key aspects of making an inference are considering all available details, understanding the full context, and ensuring conclusions are supported by evidence rather than assumptions. However, inferences are not always straightforward as information can be incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory. The role of context is also important, as the meaning of words depends on their usage. There are three main types of logical reasoning used for inferences: deductive reasoning draws a specific conclusion from a general statement through examination of possibilities; inductive reasoning forms general conclusions from specific examples; and abductive reasoning develops the most probable explanation for observations through educated guesses. Overall, making accurate inferences is a complex process integrating multiple sources
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Inferences is the conclusion you reach based on the present evidence or your prior
knowledge. It is your assumption as to what happened. Naturally, your assumption
must have sound reasoning. It must aligned with the evidence present. You can also use your prior knowledge as a basis on the conclusion you reach. You can’t reach a conclusion without evidence or use wrong evidence as it would become a fallacy if you do so. Logic is used when making inferences. When you are making an inference on a situation, you must be observant. You must write down all details on the situation you are trying to infer. The key details are the evidence, the individuals related to the situation, the place it happened, the time it happened. You have to understand the situation before you make your inference. Inference is your assumption on the context. You are making a guess as to what is happening, drawing conclusions and making connections on the evidence present and your own conclusion. One thing that I have learned about making inferences is that it is not always a straightforward process. Sometimes the available information is incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory, which can make it challenging to draw accurate conclusions. Another important aspect of making inferences is the role of context. The meaning of a word or phrase can vary depending on the context in which it is used. For example, the word “bank” can refer to a financial institution, the side of a river, or a place to sit in a park, depending on the context. Therefore, to make accurate inferences, I need to consider the broader context in which a word or phrase is used. Making inferences also involves using prior knowledge and experience to fill in gaps in information. For example, if someone says, “I need to buy some dog food,” I can infer that they likely have a pet dog, based on my knowledge of common pet ownership practices. However, relying too heavily on prior knowledge can also lead to biases and inaccuracies in inferences thus it’s better to second guess what you’re uncertain of. There are three types of logical reasoning I use in making inferences. The first is deductive reasoning. It is when you take a general statement and examines the possibilities to reach a specific logical reasoning. It is a conclusion based on reasoning and logic. For example, Humans are stupid, Banag is a human thus Banag is stupid. We can see that I started with a general statement, reach a specific subject related to the statement and from there made my inference. The second one is inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that involves forming general conclusions based on specific observations or examples. For example, Banag is stupid, Banag is a human thus I can conclude that humans are stupid. The third is abductive reasoning. Abductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that involves forming the most likely explanation for a particular observation or set of observations. It is a process of making educated guesses or hypotheses based on incomplete or uncertain information. Overall, making inferences is a complex and dynamic process that requires the integration of various sources of information, context, and prior knowledge