Reaction
Reaction
𝑉_𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒=0.75∗4∗𝜆∗√(𝑓_𝑐^
′ )∗𝑏_0∗𝑑
6.3 9.79%
6.9 7.89%
5.85 6.85%
5.55 10.48%
5.55 10.26%
5.55 5.18%
5.55 20.49%
Sl No Description
1 OHWT
2 PW Load
4 Wind Load
5 EQ Load
Mat foundation has been provided from Grid 1-B to Grid 4-F
Drawing showed 10/12mm rebar @100mm c/c used as tie bar along
the full length of column.
150mm compacted sand has been provided below single footing.
Observations
As per Discussion with Client, there is no requirement of OHWT.
Grid: 4-D, 4-E, 4-F, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 1-D, 1-E, 1-F foundation be
provided single footing instead of mat.
As per seismic detailing standard, column tie bar spacing at middle
L/2 portion should be higher than top & bottom L/4 portion. There is
potential scope to optimize the design.
Compacted sand should not required as soil profile is good. Story Label (from ETABS) Output Case
Base 13 F01
Base 16 F01
Base 18 F01
Base 20 F01
Base 40 F01
Base 43 F01
Base 45 F01
Base 60 F01
Base 62 F01
Base 64 F01
Base 66 F01
FZ (kip) Required Area (sqm) Provided Area (sqm) % of possible Optimization
800.06 24.79 32.49 31.09%
1012.32 28.51 39.69 15.04%
805.22 22.68 29.16 6.25%
815.13 22.96 32.49 16.95%
1060.66 29.87 39.69 9.79%
1294.80 36.47 47.61 7.89%
939.77 26.47 34.22 6.85%
818.02 23.04 30.80 10.48%
819.66 23.08 30.80 10.26%
859.28 24.20 30.80 5.18%
750.06 21.12 30.80 20.49%
1136.3871492117
153.565830974554
1074.96081682188
26874.020420547
142500
169374.020420547