Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance
on
Quality Assurance
Submitted to
Submitted by
Madam A. Mukherjee
Senior Lecturer
M.Sc. Nursing final year student
W.B.G.C.O.N.
W.B.G.C.O.N.
I.P.G.M.E.& R. SSKM Hospital
Kolkata I.P.G.M.E.& R. SSKM Hospital
Kolkata
Introduction
Morbidity on account of mental illness is set to overtake cardiovascular diseases as the single
largest risk in India. There are over two crore persons in our country who are in need of
treatment for serious mental disorder and about five crore people who are affected by
common mental disorder.
Quality Assurance system motivates nurses to strive for excellence in delivering quality care
and to be more open and flexible in experimenting with innovative ways to change outmoded
systems
Florence Nightingale introduced the concept of quality in nursing care in 1855 while
attending the soldiers in the hospital during the Crimean war.
Quality assurance provides the mechanisms to effectively monitor patient care provided by
health care professionals using cost-effective resources.
Quality assurance is generally and defined as the process where the performance of a system
or service is assessed and evaluated to ensure that a high quality, safe service is offered and
delivered to those using it, and that it complies with agreed standards, accreditation and any
relevant legislation and safety requirements. Quality assurance generally takes the form of a
range of activities, from the identification and monitoring of appropriate standards
(international, national, regional and local) including clinical safety and clinical standards, to
the formal and Informal monitoring and inspection of services, to the lodging of,
investigation into and reporting of complaints and serious incidents to advocacy for those
using the service. The main objective of these activities is to ensure a good quality and safe
Service system for those using them, their families and carers and a level of assurance for all
the communities.
Quality comprises of
– Acceptability
– Affordability
– Effectiveness
– Comprehensiveness
– Specification of criteria
– Funds are available only after evidence is provided that predetermined standards of care
have been met.
– QA is one way in which professional nurses regulate their profession in order to maintain
high level of nursing practice and at the same time retain the confidence of the public.
Policy-makers have a key role in the quest for quality. They are in a position to establish
the broad parameters of quality through consultation, Partnerships, legislation, funding
and planning.
Consultation (Functions): Obtaining input from various stakeholders, sharing information
across stakeholder groups and building a common understanding. The development of
such an understanding is an essential task of policy-makers.
Partnerships (Functions): Partnerships with professional groups, academic institutions,
advocacy groups, Other health and social service sectors.
These partnerships form the backbone of the quality improvement process and enable
long-term sustainability. They build consensus and consistency in messages related to the
need for quality and can also serve to mobilize resources and other necessary supports.
Legislation: Policy-makers should promote legislation that reflects concern for and
emphasis on quality.
Funding: Financial systems for mental health care should be aligned so that they
maximize quality and do not become an obstacle to quality improvement.Improved
efficiency is an essential goal in relation to both quality improvement and cost
containment.
Planning : Quality processes can inform planning by providing a knowledge base for
evidence-based practice. In the course of planning, several issues pertaining to resource
allocation and priority-setting have a bearing on quality.
Once policies have been aligned for quality the next essential step is to develop a set
of standards against which services can be measured. Planners and managers should
establish a working group Consult with relevant stakeholders and draft a standards
document.
The standards document should cover all aspects of a mental health service.
Criteria for each standard should be specified.
These criteria should provide a means for rating existing services.
The rating of services should be supplemented by observations on the quality of all
aspects of mental health care.
Step 3. Establish accreditation procedures
Accreditation provides the opportunity to assess the quality of care delivered by a mental
health service and to provide the service with the appropriate legal recognition.
Accreditation is essential because it makes quality a cornerstone of the official licensing
of mental health services or facilities.
Service planners should ascertain whether any accreditation procedures already exist
which can be used to assess current services.
Outdated procedures should be reformed in keeping with the evidence for the most
clinically effective and humane forms of mental health care.
Accreditation procedures should be developed if there are none.
The standards document developed in step 2 can be used as a structure to provide criteria
and a rating system for assessing services and conferring the appropriate legal status.
Step 4. Monitor the mental health service by using the quality mechanisms
Step 5. Integrate quality improvement into the ongoing management and delivery of
services
Managing annual service quality reviews; including quality checks in service planning
targets;
Building quality improvement into clinical practice through evidence-based practice,
clinical practice guidelines, teamwork and continuing professional development; audit.
Step 6. Consider systematic reform for the improvement of services.
An assessment of the quality of a mental health service may indicate a need for
systematic reform or improvement.
This step may require concrete planning and coordination by various sectors.
Step 7. Review the quality mechanisms
– Standards of care
– Peer review
– Level of practice
– Credentials
– Licensure
– Certification
Standards of care
Standards of care is drawn from available knowledge about human being, the norms of group
who care for patients and values of nurses.
– to safeguard
– Higher education
Criteria
Criteria are specific, predetermined rules or principles developed by health care practices for
a given setting and against which the health care practices implemented in that setting are
compared.
Structure criteria
It indicates the aim and purposes of institution or agency or program and can be designed for
the institution, or agency, the client or the nurse. Statement may be made about the
philosophy and objectives of the institution, the facilities, administrative organization,
regulations, standards and procedures. E.g of structure criteria are
– The expectation that staff nurses have completed a course in group therapy
– The requirement that each client in each unit has an attendant to provide care.
Process Criteria
Process criteria are used in the evaluation of actions and the sequence of behavior and events
during the provision of client care. E.g documentation of the therapeutic one to one
relationship and progress notes
– Data to indicate whether or not the nursing care plan was developed
Benefits
To identify problems that occur while caring for clients and to take immediate measures that
can change or improve the final outcome of care. Enables the nursing dept. to evaluate the
extent to which care is completed. The implementation of policy and procedures and the
activities.
Outcome criteria
– Developed to evaluate the end result of the care and services provided to the client E.g
client orientation about time, place, person and his responsibility for activities of daily living
when discharged from hospital.
When the outcome or effect of intervention are reviewed and it is found that it is not reaching
the standards or predetermined criteria then It is difficult to determine whether
Protocols
Aim
Development of protocol
Audits :
Auditing is the verification that the nursing care given to client is appropriate and in
accordance with the predetermined standards of nursing care in a particular area.It is a
mechanism used to asses and verifies the quality of client care.
Methods of nursing audit are the Concurrent view and the Retrospective view
Concurrent audit:
Immediate feedback.
Retrospective audit :
It was applied after services have been rendered. Data one can get from records or interview
Peer review : It is the process by which the quality of nursing care rendered by a nurse is
evaluated by other psychiatric nurses actively involved in clinical nursing practice.
Aim
To improve overall client care.
Promote individual accountability and are often the primary way of recognizing clinical
expertise. It allows degree of consistency between practice and predetermined standards.
Levels of practice
– educational accomplishments
Continuing education program: Includes short term planned programs of courses under the
direct direction of staff educators or academicians. Learning experience are designed to
enhance previously acquired knowledge and skill. Post Basic and Post-graduate education:
Includes program of study under the direction of professional educators in college or
university. Function: To prepare nurse specialist with the additional knowledge and skill
necessary to exercise independent judgment.
It is a post basic mental health psychiatric nursing programs, emphasis is usually placed on
– Assessment
– Modes of evaluation
Post graduate in Psychiatric Nursing (MSc-Psychiatric Nursing.) : Is a post graduate mental
health psychiatric nursing programs, emphasis is usually placed on
Licensure : They suggest that institutional licensure will costs and promote efficiency by:
Practice models : Practice models may be defined as various pattern in delivery of nursing
services by which health care is made available to diverse groups of people in different
settings.
Frame work for Quality Assurance
One suggested framework for quality assurance consists of two key’pillars’, each with a core
set of interrelated functions:
2. Quality management
As the field of nursing grows and changes in defining the role of a nurse, the central theme
will always be that of caring. It can be said that, all other duties and responsibilities of nurses
have centered around, “caring”. With the emergence of the, “caring”, theorists also came the
emergence of “Standards of Profession Performance”.
The American Nursing Association set forth the following requisites for standards of
professional performance.
– Quality of care
Guidance provided through a mentoring relationship and clinical supervision with a more
experienced, skilled and educated nurse.
Standards IV : Ethics
The psychiatric nurse’s assessments, actions & recommendation on behalf of the patient are
determined and implemented ethically.
Standard V : Research
The psychiatric nurse contributes to nursing & mental health through the use of research
methods and findings.
• Acute(Emergency ward)
• Sub-acute(General ward)
• Recuperation(Convalescent ward)
•The roles of nursing administrators and managers in improving psychiatric care services
Improvement of patient’s daily life skills and abilities Enhancement of patient mental
education Improvement of adherence and self-care
Conclusion
QA is the process by which the maintenance of excellence in the provision of health care is
ensured. Everyone in need should have access to basic mental health care, the key principles
are that care should be equitable and accessible.
To improve the quality of psychiatric services, the following matters require attention :
1. Quality improvement for mental health :Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance
Package, WHO.2003. http://www.who.int/mental_health/resources/en/Quality.pdf. 24-
Aug-2016.
QA_Framework_Final_Report_11_October_2011_FINAL_2. sflb.ashx
http://currentnursing.com/nursing_management/total_quality
_management_health_care.html. 24-Aug-2016
2. World Health Organization. (2001b) Atlas: mental health resources in the world.
Geneva: World Health Organization.
http://currentnursing.com/nursing_management/total_quality_
management_health_care.html. 24-Aug-2016
3. World Health Organization. (2001a) World Health Report 2001. Mental health: new
understanding, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organization.
4. Koch M.W And Fairly T.M. Integrated Quality Management: The Key To Improving
Nursing Care Quality. 1st Edition.St.Louis,Missouri:MosbyPublications;2009.
5. Yeaman C, et al. (2000) Performance improvement teams for better psychiatric
rehabilitation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 27:113-2
6. World Health Organization, 2003. Quality improvement for mental health: Mental
health policy and service guidance package.
http://www.who.int/mental_health/resources/en/Quality.pdf
7. Gaebel a, et al. Guidance on quality assurance in mental healthcare. European
Psychiatry. 30 (2015). Pp. 360-387
http://www.mentalhealth.wa.gov.au/Libraries/pdf_docs/WA_QA_
8. Framework_Final_Report_11_October_2011_FINAL_2.sflb.ash x
9. Developing a Quality Assurance Framework for Mental Health in Western
Australia.http://www.mentalhealth.wa.gov.au/Libraries/pdf_docs/WA_QA