QM2 HM2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Homework Set 2 — Symmetries 1

Due Apriil 11, 2021

1. Parity is often treated as a mirror reflection. This is certainly true in 1 dimension, where
x → −x may be viewed as the effect of reflecting through a (point) mirror at the origin. In
three dimensions when we use a plane mirror (say lying on the x − y plane), only one (z)
coordinate gets reversed, whereas the parity transformation reverses all three coordinates.
Verify that reflection in a mirror in the x − y plane is the same as parity followed by a π
(180◦ ) rotation about the z axis. Since rotational invariance holds for weak interactions,
noninvariance under mirror reflection implies noninvariance under parity.

2. Let Td denote the translation operator (with displacement vector d); D(n̂, φ) the rotation
operator (n̂ and φ are the axis and angle of rotation, respectively); and π the parity operator.
Which, if any, of the following pairs commute? Why?

(a) Td and Td0 (with d and d’ in different directions)


(b) D(n̂, φ) and D(n̂0 , φ) (n̂ and n̂0 in different directions)
(c) Td and π
(d) D(n̂, φ) and π
1
3. A spin 2
particle is bound to a fixed center by a spherically symmetric potential.
j=1/2,m=1/2
(a) Write down the spin angular function Yl=0 (see, e.g., Sakurai Chapter 3)
j=1/2,m=1/2
(b) Express (σ · x)Yl=0 in terms of some other Ylj,m .
(c) Show that your result in 3b is understandable in view of the transformation properties
of the operator S · x under rotations and under space inversion (parity)

1
4. Because of weak (neutral-current) interactions there is a parity-violating potential between
the atomic electron and the nucleus as follows:

V = λ δ (3) (x)S · p + S · pδ (3) (x) ,


 
(1)

where S and p are the spin and momentum operators of the electron, and the nucleus is
assumed to be situated at the origin. As a result, the ground state of an alkali atom, usually
characterized by |n, l, j, mi actually contains very tiny contributions from other eigenstates
as follows:
X
|n, l, j, mi → |n, l, j, mi + Cn0 l0 j 0 m0 |n0 , l0 , j 0 , m0 i. (2)
n0 l0 j 0 m0

On the basis of symmetry considerations alone, what can you say about (n0 , l0 , j 0 , m0 ), which
give rise to nonvanishing contributions? Suppose the radial wave functions and the energy
levels are all known. Indicate how you may calculate Cn0 l0 j 0 m0 . Do we get further restrictions
on (n0 , l0 , j 0 , m0 )?

You might also like