Subsonic Energy Maneuverability Diagrams For DCS
Subsonic Energy Maneuverability Diagrams For DCS
Subsonic Energy Maneuverability Diagrams For DCS
Energy
Maneuverability
Diagrams for Selected
DCS: World Aircraft
Maximum instantaneous
• Angle of attack
performance
• Turn radius
Maximum
• Load factor (G)
sustained turn rate
In general, the more energy an aircraft has, the more options it has
for maneuvering. An aircraft that can build a high energy margin Lift limit
relative to its opponent can cash in this energy in an attack. (stall)
Maximum climb
2
fi
fi
fl
How This Works
These diagrams are based on estimates of Tests Performed
subsonic thrust, lift, and drag characteristics
based on ight tests performed in DCS for a
standard day and xed fuel setting.
• Sustained turns at various speeds between
powered stall and Mach 0.8 (or maximum
speed) at 1,000 ft
3
fl
fl
fi
ff
Caveats
• This document only focuses on energy However, even this approach does not work
maneuverability, or an aircraft’s ability to with models of certain aircraft. For example,
change is velocity vector quickly. Other the F-14B model is invalid above Mach 0.6.
• The fuel/weight settings apply only to • This document will be updated roughly
mobettameta’s DCS Dog ghters server, which quarterly with additional aircraft, including the
are optimized for about 6 minutes of ght time MiG-21, MB-339, and F-4. Future iterations
at maximum power based on user feedback.
may include altitude-Mach diagrams exploring
the full subsonic and supersonic envelope of
• Variable geometry and automatic high-lift these aircraft.
devices are generally handled by assuming a
correlation between angle of attack and speed.
4
fi
ffi
fi
ffi
ff
fi
fl
Summary Data
De nitions
• Maximum instantaneous turn rate is the highest
turn rate achievable by an aircraft. It occurs at
maximum G and normally can only be held in a
dive.
5
fi
fl
fl
fl
fi
Turning vs. Climbing in a Dogfight
30 Fights between aircraft with major
performance di erences often boil down to
Turn rate
Red has higher Ps
a contest of turn performance vs. climb
ΔPs =0
º/s Blue has higher Ps performance. These are best captured by
thrust-to-weight ratio (T/W) and wing
0 loading (the ratio of weight to wing area).
0 1
Mach number The aircraft with a higher T/W should
• Sea level, clean, DCS Dog ghters server fuel settings
leverage its superior acceleration and climb
(~6 minutes at maximum power)
performance. This means it should favor
• Ps not evaluated for M > 0.8
• F-14B results not valid for M > 0.6 due to wing sweep
6
ff
fi
fi
fl
fl
ff
fi
ff
fi
Relative Turn/Climb Tradeoff
These charts slice the EM diagrams along selected G contours. They illustrate how a bandit’s energy may be drained or how its climb
ability may be restricted by pulling moderate sustained G. For example, an F-86 will develop a maneuverability advantage over an F-16C
if both aircraft are pulling 5 G below 350 knots, but an F-16 that stays above 350 knots can build an energy advantage over an F-86.
Similarly, an F-15 pulling 5 G above 380 knots can build energy margins over a Mirage 2000 at the same speed and load factor.
1G 3G 5G
7
Fast Jets
F/A-18C
Wingspan 37 ft / 11 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
1.1
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 82 lb/sqft
Notes
Tight turn radius, high climb rates, and high sustained
turn rate make this a versatile dog ghter.
9
fi
fi
F/A-18C
G-limiter disengaged
Wingspan 37 ft / 11 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
1.1
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 82 lb/sqft
Notes
Tight turn radius, high climb rates, and high sustained
turn rate make this a versatile dog ghter. This
diagram assumes a 9 G limit with the paddle switch.
10
fi
fi
F-16C
Wingspan 33 ft / 10 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
1.2
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 90 lb/sqft
Notes
Dominant energy ghter, but generally disadvantaged
in horizontal turns. High fuel fraction may mean better
relative turn performance later in the ght. G-limiter
schedule is not re ected in the upper part of this
diagram and maximum performance may be
somewhat lower than indicated.
11
fi
fi
fl
fi
F-15C
Wingspan 43 ft / 13 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
1.2
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 59 lb/sqft
Notes
12
fi
F-14B
Wingspan (upswept) 64 ft / 20 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.9
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 95 lb/sqft
Notes
Flight model only valid below Mach 0.6 due to wing
sweep schedule. Multiple issues with t dampen
con dence in ight model solution. Future versions
will resolve these issues.
13
fi
fi
fl
fi
F-5E
Wingspan 27 ft / 8 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.7
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 65 lb/sqft
Notes
Disadvantaged throughout entire envelope when
compared with most ghters in DCS.
14
fi
fi
M2000C
Wingspan 30 ft / 9 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.9
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 47 lb/sqft
Notes
Dominant turn ghter due to low wing loading and
high thrust-to-weight ratio.
15
fi
fi
Mirage F1CE
Wingspan 28 ft / 9 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.8
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 82 lb/sqft
Notes
Poor instantaneous turn performance and
unexceptional sustained turn and climb performance.
16
fi
MiG-29S
Wingspan 37 ft / 11 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
1.0
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 80 lb/sqft
Notes
Similar to F-16C, but better sustained turn
performance at high speed. Vulnerable in one-circle
ows.
17
fl
fi
Su-27
Wingspan 48 ft / 15 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.9
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 71 lb/sqft
Notes
Excellent turn performance
18
fi
Su-33
Wingspan 48 ft / 15 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.9
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 75 lb/sqft
Notes
19
fi
Subsonic Jets
F-86F
Wingspan 37 ft / 11 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.4
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 39 lb/sqft
Notes
Low thrust-to-weight ratio is compensated by low
wing loading and superlatively high lift-to-drag ratio
((L/D)max ≈ 14) throughout its envelope. Maximum-
performance turns come with a minimum loss of
energy.
21
fi
MiG-15bis
Wingspan 33 ft / 10 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.5
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 44 lb/sqft
Notes
Low wing loading and high lift-to-drag ratio give
exceptional sustained turn performance at low speed.
G-LOC onset at 7 G. Sluggish roll rate due to
mechanical aileron linkages.
22
fi
A-10CII
Wingspan 57 ft / 18 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.3
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 65 lb/sqft
Notes
Poor climb performance and unexceptional turn
performance. A fun novelty in a dog ght, particularly
against opponents with wider turn radii.
23
fi
fi
C-101CC
Wingspan 34 ft / 11 m
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
0.2
(M = 0.5)
Wing Loading 55 lb/sqft
Notes
Surprisingly poor turn performance for its airframe.
Compressor stalls at moderate angles of attack.
24
fi
Piston-Engine Aircraft
P-51D
Wingspan 36 ft / 11 m
Notes
26
fi
Spitfire Mk IX
Wingspan 36 ft / 11 m
Notes
Arguably the best turn ghter in DCS
27
fi
fi
I-16
Wingspan 30 ft / 9 m
Notes
Tightest turn radius for an armed aircraft in DCS
28
fi
Mosquito FB VI
Wingspan 54 ft / 16 m
Notes
Poor dog ght performance, but suitable opponent for
the A-10 and trainer aircraft.
29
fi
fi