ASC 606 Revenue Recognition - Membership Dues
ASC 606 Revenue Recognition - Membership Dues
ASC 606 Revenue Recognition - Membership Dues
An exchange (or exchange transaction) is a reciprocal transfer between two entities that results
in one of the entities acquiring assets or services or satisfying liabilities by surrendering other assets or
services or incurring other obligations.
contribution. An unconditional transfer of cash or other assets, as well as unconditional promises to give,
to an entity or a reduction, settlement, or cancellation of its liabilities in a voluntary nonreciprocal transfer by
another entity acting other than as an owner. Those characteristics distinguish contributions from:
a. Exchange transactions, which are reciprocal transfers in which each party receives and sacrifices
approximately commensurate value
b. Investments by owners and distributions to owners, which are nonreciprocal transfers between an
entity and its owners
c. Other nonreciprocal transfers, such as impositions of taxes or legal judgments, fines, and thefts, which
are not voluntary transfers.
In a contribution transaction, the resource provider often receives value indirectly by providing a societal
benefit although that benefit is not considered to be of commensurate value. In an exchange transaction,
the potential public benefits are secondary to the potential direct benefits to the resource provider. The term
contribution revenue is used to apply to transactions that are part of the entity's ongoing major or central
activities (revenues) or are peripheral or incidental to the entity (gains).
Note that the definition for contribution is in accordance with FASB ASU No. 2018-08, Not-for-Profit Entities
(Topic 958): Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions
Made This ASU was issued in June 2018, with an effective date that is aligned with FASB ASU No. 2014-09
, as amended by FASB ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of
the Effective Date .
8.6.71 Therefore, a contribution differs from an exchange transaction because an exchange transaction is a
reciprocal transfer in which each party receives and sacrifices something of approximately commensurate value.
Membership Dues
8.6.72 Paragraphs 9–12 of FASB ASC 958-605-55 discuss NFPs that receive dues from their members.
This paragraph and the following paragraph and table reproduce that guidance. The term "members" is used
broadly by some NFPs to refer to their donors and by other NFPs to refer to individuals or other entities that pay
dues in exchange for a defined set of benefits. These transfers often have elements of both a contribution and
an exchange transaction because members receive tangible or intangible benefits from their membership in the
NFP. For example, the exchange portion of member benefits may include a journal subscription, discounted or
free continuing professional education (CPE) classes, conferences and seminars, discounted or free tickets to
seats at performing arts events, discounted services, access to locked website contents or a library, networking
opportunities, or career qualifications. When membership dues carry traits of both contributions and exchange
components, they should be bifurcated as required in FASB ASC 606-10-15-4 (see the “Bifurcation of
Transactions Between Contribution and Exchange Components” section in paragraphs 8.7.02–8.7.06, for
additional discussion on bifurcation). Usually, the determination of whether membership dues are contributions
rests on whether the value received by the member is commensurate with the dues paid. For example, if an NFP
has annual dues of $100 and the only benefit members receive is a monthly newsletter with a fair value of $25,
$25 of the dues are received in an exchange transaction and $75 of the dues are a contribution.
8.6.73 Member benefits generally have value regardless of how often (or whether) the benefits are used. For
example, most would agree that a health club membership is an exchange transaction, even if the member stops
using the facilities before the completion of the membership period. It may be difficult, however, to measure the
8.6.89 The assessment of what constitutes a significant benefit of financing requires judgment. BC234 of
FASB ASU No. 2014-09 states that “for many contracts, an entity will not need to adjust the promised amount
of customer consideration because the effects of the financing component will not materially change the amount
of revenue that should be recognized in relation to a contract with a customer.” The assessment of what
constitutes a significant benefit of financing will be based upon individual facts and circumstances for each
entity. If an entity concludes the financing component is not significant, the entity does not need to adjust the
consideration promised in determining the transaction price. Under FASB ASC 606-10-32-18, as a practical
expedient, an NFP need not adjust the transaction price for a significant financing component if the NFP expects,
at contract inception, that the period between transfer of the goods or services to the customer and payment by
the customer will be one year or less.
Step 4: Allocate the Transaction Price to the Performance Obligations in the Contract
8.6.90 As explained in FASB ASC 606-10-32-28, for a contract with a customer that has more than one
performance obligation, an NFP should allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in an
amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the NFP expects to be entitled in exchange for
transferring the promised goods or services to the customer.
8.6.91 In the case in which there are multiple performance obligations, as required by FASB ASC 606-10-32-29,
the NFP should allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation identified in a contract on a relative
standalone selling price basis. As required by FASB ASC 606-10-32-33, if a standalone selling price is not
observable, the NFP should estimate it. FASB ASC 606-10-32-34 provides examples of suitable methods
for estimating the standalone selling price of a good or service. If the transaction price includes a discount or
variable consideration that relates entirely to one or more, but not all, performance obligations in a contract,
then the requirements in paragraphs 36–41 of FASB ASC 606-10-32 specify when an entity should allocate the
discount or variable consideration to one (or some) performance obligation(s) rather than to all performance
obligations in the contract.
8.6.92 Continuing the example in paragraph 8.6.86, after determining the transaction price, the association
should allocate the transaction price to each separately identifiable performance obligation in an amount that
depicts the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the
promised goods or services to the customer, as required by FASB ASC 606-10-32-28. Thus, if the right to obtain
a discount on the future educational opportunities is a material right, the membership dues should be allocated
among the performance obligations including the discount right.
Step 5: Recognize Revenue When (or As) the Entity Satisfies a Performance Obligation
8.6.93 As explained in FASB ASC 606-10-25-23 , an NFP should recognize revenue when (or as) it satisfies
the performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service to the customer. For the membership
8.6.98 The following examples are meant to be illustrative, and the application of FASB ASC 606 should be
based on the facts and circumstances of an entity’s specific situation.
Example 8-6-3 — Subscriptions Received as Part of a Membership