GURU NANAK DEV ENGINEERING COLLEGE, LUDHIANA

An Autonomous College Under UGC Act [2(f) and 12(B)]

(Department of Electrical Engineering)
RUBRICS FOR MINOR PROJECT EVALUATION
Rubrics Review
Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage

Review 1 Project Synopsis/ Proposal Rubric R1 (9) (60)

Evaluation
Review 2 Mid-Term Project Evaluation Rubric R2 (12)
Review 3 End Semester Project Rubric R3 (18)
Evaluation
Review 4 Project Report Evaluation Rubric R4 (12)

Review 5 Evaluation by Guide Rubric R5 (9)

External Evaluation (40) (40)

Total (100) (100)

 Department of EE, GNDEC
Rubrics for Minor Project Evaluation

Rubric #R1: Project Synopsis/ Proposal Evaluation

Maximum Marks*: 9
Level of Achievement

Good (3) Average (2) Poor (1) Score

a Identification of Problem Detailed and extensive Average explanation of the Minimal explanation of the
Domain and Detailed Analysis explanation of the purpose purpose and need of the purpose and need of the
and need of the project project project

b Study of the Existing Systems Detailed and extensive Moderate study of the Minimal explanation of the
and Feasibility of Project explanation of the existing systems; collects specifications and the
Proposal specifications and the some basic information limitations of the existing
limitations of the existing systems; incomplete
systems information
c Objectives and Methodology All objectives of the Incomplete justification to Objectives of the proposed
of the Proposed Work proposed work are well the objectives proposed; work are either not identified
defined; Steps to be Steps are mentioned but or not well defined;
followed to solve the unclear; without Incomplete and improper
defined problem are clearly justification to objectives specification
specified

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 =9=a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3) Rubric2 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric3 =18= a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric4 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric5 =9= a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3)
 Department of EE, GNDEC
Rubrics for Minor Project Evaluation

Rubric #R2: Mid-term Project Evaluation

Maximum Marks*: 12
Level of Achievement
Excellent (4) Good (3) Average (2) Poor (1) Score
a Design  Divison of problem into  Divison of problem into  Divison of problem into  Modular approach not
Methodology modules and good modules and good modules but inappropriate adopted
selection of computing selection of computing selection of computing  Design methodology
framework framework framework not defined
 Appropriate design  Design methodology not  Design methodology not
methodology and properly properly justified defined properly
justification
b Planning of Time frame properly Time frame properly Time frame properly Time frame not
Project Work specified and being specified and being specified, but not being properly specified
and Team followed followed followed In-appropriate
Structure Appropriate distribution of Distribution of project Distribution of project distribution of project
project work work inappropriate work un-even work
c Demonstration  Objectives achieved as per  Objectives achieved as  Objectives achieved as per  No objectives achieved
and time frame per time frame time frame  Contents of
Presentation  Contents of presentations  Contents of  Contents of presentations presentations are not
are appropriate and well presentations are are appropriate but not appropriate and not
arranged appropriate but not well well arranged well delivered
 Proper eye contact with arranged  Presentation not  Poor delivery of
audience and clear voice  Satisfactory satisfactory and average presentation
with good spoken demonstration, clear demonstration
language voice with good spoken
language but eye contact
not proper

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 =9=a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3) Rubric2 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric3 =18= a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric4 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric5 =9= a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3)
 Department of EE, GNDEC
Rubrics for Minor Project Evaluation

Rubric #R3: End Semester Internal Project Evaluation

Maximum Marks*: 18
Level of Achievement
Excellent (6) Good (4) Average (2) Poor (1) Score
a Incorporation Changes are made as per Changes are made as per Few changes are made as Suggestions during mid
of Suggestions modifications suggested modifications suggested per modifications term evaluation are not
during mid term evaluation during mid term suggested during mid term incorporated
and new innovations added evaluation and good evaluation
justification
b Project All defined objectives are All defined objectives Some of the defined  Defined objectives are
Demonstration achieved are achieved objectives are achieved not achieved
Each module working well Each module working Modules are working well  Modules are not in
and properly demonstrated well and properly in isolation and properly proper working form
All modules of project are demonstrated demonstrated that further leads to
well integrated and system Integration of all  Modules of project are failure of integrated
working is accurate modules not done and not properly integrated system
system working is not
veey satisfactory
c Presentation  Contents of presentations  Contents of  Contents of presentations  Contents of
are appropriate and well presentations are are not appropriate presentations are not
delivered appropriate and well  Eye contact with few appropriate and not
Proper eye contact with delivered people and unclear voice well delivered
audience and clear voice  Clear voice with good  Poor delivery of
with good spoken spoken language but less presentation
language eye contact with
audience

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 =9=a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3) Rubric2 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric3 =18= a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric4 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric5 =9= a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3)
 Department of EE, GNDEC
Rubrics for Minor Project Evaluation

Rubric #R4: Project Report Evaluation

Maximum Marks*: 12
Level of Achievement
Excellent (4) Good (3) Average (2) Poor (1) Score
a Project Project report is according Project report is Project report is according Project report not
Report to the specified format according to the to the specified format but prepared according to
References and citations are specified format some mistakes the specified format
appropriate and well References and citations In-sufficient references References and
mentioned are appropriate but not and citations citations are not
mentioned well appropriate
b Description Complete explanation of the Complete explanation of Complete explanation of Inapproiate explanation
of Concepts key concepts the key concepts the key concepts but little of the key concepts
and Technical Strong description of the In-sufficient description relevance to literature Poor description of the
Details technical requirements of of the technical In-sufficient description of technical requirements
the project requirements of the the technical requirements of the project
project of the project
c Conclusion Results are presented in very Results are presented in Results presented are not Results are not
and appropriate manner good manner much satisfactory presented properly
Discussion Project work is well Project work summary Project work summary and Project work is not
summarized and concluded and conclusion not very conclusion not very summarized and
Future extensions in the appropriate appropriate concluded
project are well specified Future extensions in the Future extensions in the Future extensions in the
project are specified project are specified project are not
specified

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 =9=a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3) Rubric2 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric3 =18= a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric4 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric5 =9= a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3)
 Department of EE, GNDEC
Rubrics for Minor Project Evaluation

Rubric #R5: Evaluation by Guide

Maximum Marks*: 9
Level of Achievement

Good (3) Average (2) Poor (1) Score

a Working within a Team Collaborates and communicates in a group Exchanges some Makes little or no attempt to
situation and integrates the views of others views but requires collaborate in a group
guidance to situation
collaborate with
others.
b Technical Knowledge Extensive knowledge related to the project Fair knowledge related Lacks sufficient knowledge
and Awareness related to the project
to the Project

c Regularity Reports to the guide regularly and consistent Not very regular but Irregular in attendance and
in work consistent in the work inconsistent in work

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 =9=a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3) Rubric2 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric3 =18= a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric4 =12= a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)
Rubric5 =9= a(3)+ b(3)+ c(3)