0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views84 pages

Coliving Space: A Thesis Report

This document outlines a proposal for a coliving space project in Bangalore, India. Coliving involves shared living arrangements that aim to reduce loneliness and foster community among residents. The project seeks to design a sustainable communal living space that addresses housing demands while providing social and professional support services for students and young professionals.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views84 pages

Coliving Space: A Thesis Report

This document outlines a proposal for a coliving space project in Bangalore, India. Coliving involves shared living arrangements that aim to reduce loneliness and foster community among residents. The project seeks to design a sustainable communal living space that addresses housing demands while providing social and professional support services for students and young professionals.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 84

COLIVING SPACE

A THESIS REPORT

Submitted by

S. A. ELAKKIA
RA1611201010024

In partial fulfilment for the award of the degree

Of

BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE

SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY


KATTANKULATHUR

KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT – 603 203.

SRM SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN


NOVEMBER 2020
SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE

Certified that this project ‘COLIVING SPACE’ is the bonafide work of

S. A. ELAKKIA – RA1611201010024 who

Carried out the thesis work under my supervision.

Ar. Prof. Karthick KA Prof. Kamalakannan. T. R Prof. Prashant.P


ADVISOR/GUIDE INTERNAL PANEL
THESIS COORDINATOR
MEMBER

SIGNATURE

EXTERNAL EXAMINER - 1 EXTERNAL EXAMINER - 2 Dr.P.Satheesh Kumar

DEAN, School of Architecture


& Interior Design
DECLARATION

I declare this thesis titled “COLIVING SPACE” at “WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE” is

the bonafide work by me, under the guidance of Ar. Prof. Karthick. KA, School of

Architecture and Interior Design, SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,

Kattankulathur, during the session of June 2020 – November 2020.

I declare further that the work reported therein does not form a part of any other
thesis based on which a Degree or Award was conferred on an earlier occasion.

CHENNAI : STUDENT SIGNATURE

DATE : S. A. ELAKKIA
RA1611201010024
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Develop an attitude of gratitude, and give thanks for everything that happens to you,
knowing that every step forward is a step towards achieving something bigger and
better than your current situation.
--Brian Tracy—

I would like to express my gratitude to Dr.P.Satheesh Kumar, Dean, School of


Architecture and Interior Design, Prof. Kamalakannan. T.R (Internal Panel Members)
for their suggestions, encouragements, comments and constructive criticism given
which has made this project a success.

I am thankful to Ar. Periyannan for enriching me with his/her knowledge and


guiding me with his/her valuable experience during various stages of my thesis
review sessions.

I am thankful to Ar. Karthick KA for the patience he/she extended towards me;
offering his/her guidance and immense support during this entire semester and
helping me complete this project.

I am also thankful to Prof. Prashant. P (Thesis Coordinator), Ar. Manjari. K and Ar.
Geeva Chandana. B (Assistant Thesis Coordinators) for their immense support during this
entire semester and helping me complete this project.

I thank all the faculty members of the Department of Architecture for the
encouragement and inspiration to execute the project.

I also thank my family for all their support through these years. Lastly, I thank all
my fellow batch mates, who stood beside and aided me in making this project a
success.
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE.NO

• Bonafide Certificate ----------------------------------- i


• Declaration ----------------------------------- ii
• Acknowledgement ----------------------------------- iii
• List of Figures ----------------------------------- iv
• List of Tables ----------------------------------- v

PART I: ABSTRACT ------------------------------- 01

PART II: INTRODUCTION

• Introduction ---------------------------- 02
• Need for the project ---------------------------- 03
• Justification for the project - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 04

PART III: CASE STUDIES


• Case Study --------------------- 08
o Comparative analysis --------------------- 20
• Case Study – In Bangalore --------------------- 22
o Comparative analysis --------------------- 29
• Case Study – Spatial understanding --------------------- 31
o Comparative analysis --------------------- 34
• Thrust area study --------------------- 35

PART IV: SITE DATA


• Proposal ----------------------------- 38
• Site data ----------------------------- 39
o Site Drawings ----------------------------- 40
• Site study ----------------------------- 41
• Development control rules ----------------------------- 49
• Site Analysis ----------------------------- 51
PART V: REQUIREMENTS
• Area Requirements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54

PART VI: DESIGN


• Site Plan ------------------------------------ 54
• Floor Plans ------------------------------------ 55
• Basement plan ------------------------------------ 60
• Sections ------------------------------------ 61
• Elevations ------------------------------------ 62
• 3D Views ------------------------------------ 63

PART VII: REFERENCES


• Bibliography

ENCLOSURES
• Design sheets
• CD
1
PART – 2

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION:

▪ Co-living is a type of intentional community providing shared living space for people
with shared intentions.
▪ It is a modern form of housing where residents share living space with a similar a set
of interests, values, and/or intentions.
▪ It’s a new take on an old idea, that values things like openness and collaboration,
social networking, and the sharing economy.

AIM:

▪ Uplift the standard of living for students in higher education and the employees who
are growing at a rapid pace across metropolitan cities.
▪ Provide an environment which deals with the work/academic pressure that the young
workers and students are facing.
▪ To encourage community interaction and social engagement among residents.

OBJECTIVES:

▪ A fully complied, purpose built living environment for young students and workers.
▪ Providing open spaces, calm environment which is free from the external hazards.
▪ Provide shared spaces along with individual rooms which accommodates a group of
people or a community.

SCOPE OF THE PROJECT:

▪ The project focuses on creating sustainable community and a sense of belonging to


any individual who come in lost not knowing anyone and where to stay in large

2
metropolitan cities. This project addresses increasing housing demands and provides
social lifestyle for young, single students and workers at an affordable rent.

1) Designing a sustainable and communal liveable space.

2) Providing hospitality services and an ecosystem that will support the residents in
their academic and professional pursuits.

3) A purpose-built co-living space for their needs, all utilities, weekly cleanings, basic
household supplies, and organized community events

THRUST AREA:

▪ The project focuses on the Behavioral and Psychological aspects of the users.
▪ Behavioral design is a sub-category of design, which is concerned with how design can
shape, or be used to influence human behavior
▪ Behavioral architecture is an architecture that is able to handle human needs and
feelings that adjust to the lifestyle of humans in it. the word "behavior" expresses an
awareness of the social structure of the people, a dynamic movement together in
time.

NEED FOR THE PROJECT:

WHY COLIVING SPACE?

▪ Young people are flocking to cities for opportunities and the housing stock is just isn’t
growing as fast as their migration.
▪ And, even though new technology has enabled people to become more connected
virtually, social isolation and chronic loneliness have been on rise as a global epidemic.
▪ Thus, developing a shared living space encourages community interaction and a sense
of belonging.

3
UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT:

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CO-LIVING AND CO-HOUSING:

• One of the main differences between these two is that Coliving involves much more
sharing of spaces.

• While Cohousing communities tend to have individual, free-standing units each with
private bathrooms and kitchens, Coliving spaces tend to share more of these areas

• In addition to sharing significant indoor living spaces, both coliving and cohousing
places a strong focus on integrating shared features such as specialized work spaces,
gymnasiums/health clubs, and game areas

TYPES OF COLIVING SPACES:

1. COHOUSING COMMUNITY:

▪ Intentional communities are created and run by their residents, with a characteristic of having
private homes cluster around shared space.

▪ Each private unit has their own facilities and rooms to create a private life for each resident,
but they also have shared and common facilities.

▪ This type means also being involved in the development, financial and construction part of the
building since each house is owned by each resident.

4
▪ This was the first form of coliving, which emerged in Denmark in 1972.

2. COLIVING APARTMENTS:

▪ Coliving apartments offers a living space with the highest level of comfort and flexibility.

▪ They offer apartments of different typologies for long and short term staying, that is Ensuite
room or studio apartments.

▪ It also includes a big common area: from a shared living area or a dining area, until a cinema,
gym and a supermarket.

3. SUPPORTED LIVING SPACES:

• This is a type of housing where an individual needs special/extra care .

• The user chooses the house, if sharing or not. If yes, it would be one or a group of people and
also, what type of support the person needs.

4. SERVICE APARTMENTS:

▪ They are furnished apartment for a short-term or long-term staying, with housekeeping and
other services for guests.

▪ They offer a space more like a house, with a bigger kitchen and other facilities included, like
gym, restaurant and laundry room.

CLEARING THE CONFUSION:

5
TYPES OF ROOMS IN COLIVING SPACE:

1. STUDIO:

▪ A studio is a small apartment which combines several rooms, often the living room, bedroom,
and kitchen.

▪ This means that you will have your own private space that includes your sleeping area and
kitchen.

▪ You will also have your very own bathroom and living space.

▪ These types of rooms are perfect for those who value privacy and want to be independent.

▪ However, if you want to share the place with someone, some studios are big enough to cater
to two people.

6
2. EN-SUITE:

▪ In this type of room, you get to enjoy your own sleeping space and private bathroom.
However, you do not get your own kitchenette or cooking facilities.

▪ En-suite has a common kitchen that is shared among residents.

▪ Private Non-Ensuite – Over here, you get your own private room with a shared bathroom.

▪ Slightly different than en-suite. You do get a bed and lockable space but will have to share the
bathroom with one or more residents of your house.

3. PRIVATE ROOM:

▪ This is a private space within a shared property.

▪ Typically, a private room features a bed, a study desk and storage place.

▪ Your bedroom will be private and lockable.

▪ Depending upon the property, you may have your own bathroom or share it with housemates.

▪ Living space and cooking facilities will be shared with other students.

▪ This is the difference between a private room and en-suite room

4. APARTMENT:

▪ This is your standard apartment.

▪ The whole area is yours.

▪ You get several individual rooms, including the bedrooms, bathrooms, living areas and
kitchen.

▪ This is the perfect option for students who value their privacy.

▪ You can choose to live alone or share a two-bedroom apartment with a roommate.

▪ Students who are included on your lease will have access to your facilities, and you will need
to apply as a group.

7
PART – 3

CASE STUDIES

1. THE COLLECTIVE OLD OAK

SITE DETAILS:
LOCATION: Old oak, London, UK.

Firm: PLP Architecture.

Year: 2016.

ABOUT THE PROJECT:


PRIVATE SPACES:
▪ Collective old oak is an 16,000 sq. m purpose built co-
living facility in the Willesden Junction (Micro-units)
neighbourhood on the north-west side of London.
1.Bedroom
▪ It is the world’s largest co living block with 550
bedrooms and numerous amenities. 2.Attached bathroom

3.Kitchen
SIZE: 16,000 sq. m
No. of floors: 11
No. of residents: 500
PUBLIC SPACES:
No. of micro-units: 550
(Shared amenities)

1.Communal kitchens

2.Communal lounges

3.Laundry areas

4.Restaurants

5.Library

6.Cinema room

7.Games room (Indoor)

▪ The fitness centre and coworking spaces offer paid 8.Co-working space
membership for people that live outside of the
community in addition to Old Oak residents 9.Gym
▪ English pub, French bistro and Tea room are the 10.Spa
restaurants situated in the collective old oak.
11.Supermarket

8 12.Retail shops
PLANNING AND DESIGN:

• GROUND FLOOR:
The building also contains parking space as well as a leased office
space on the ground level.

▪ FIRST FLOOR:
The entire floor of approximately 20,000 sq. ft can be split into
studios from 2,000 sq. ft and suitable for alternative uses

Ground floor First floor [Only


[Open to public] for Residents]

Areas of G and G+1 floor

9
▪ PRIVATE SPACES:
The majority of units are studios or ‘twodios’ – each unit
containing a bed, TV, desk and chair, wardrobe, bathroom with shower, sink, and
toilet, and are around 130 sf.
Studios have their own kitchenette, while twodios share the
kitchenette and a dining space at the entry to the unit.
Twodios have the ability to be split into studios easily in the
future by ownership by building a wall, second kitchenette and adding a doorway.

Floor plan

Zoning plan

Private and Public zones

10
CIRCULATION AND SURVEILLANCE:
▪ Residents can monitor scheduled activities online but would have to go to
individual spaces to observe if people were interacting or something unscheduled
was taking place.
▪ Residents living on the side of the roof deck would be able to observe if any
activity was taking place there from their unit windows.

OTHER FEATURES:
▪ Old Oak has a team of community and event managers, who are responsible for
arranging at least 3 activities per week, geared to different tastes.
▪ These are separated from the suites so that you don’t by-pass suites to get to the
amenity spaces.
▪ The secondary or buffer zones consist of shared kitchens/lounges on each micro-
unit, which are narrow and do not provide much in the way of opportunity for
interaction.
▪ The amenities varied in style and energy level, which allows a resident to select
space based on their needs.

11
2. COHO
SITE DETAILS:
LOCATION: Gurugram, Haryana, India

Year: 2017.

SITE ADDRESS:

House No, 24,


Shahtoot Marg,
DLF Phase 1,
Sector 26A,
Gurugram,
Haryana

ABOUT THE PROJECT:

▪ Coho is an 1170 sq. m co-living apartment in Gurgaon, Haryana.


▪ Coho is one of the popular co-living spaces in India.

TSA: 1,170 sq. m (0.3 acres) PRIVATE SPACES:


No. of floors: 3 1) Bedroom
No. of residents: 66
No. of micro-units: 36 2) Attached bathroom

3) Balcony
▪ Cook, and housekeeping services are included in the
4) Breakout space
rent.
▪ There is no specific time for using the tv, gym and the PUBLIC SPACES:
gaming areas.
▪ Coho features dorms that house 66 residents and it also 1) Living area
organizes weekly events
▪ 2) Kitchen

3) Dining area
ABOUT COHO:
▪ Coho is the name derived from Co-Housing. 4) Laundry space
▪ Coho is a tech-enabled co-living platform which is
transforming the way millennials experience long stay 5) Recreation/Gaming
living in India. area
▪ This co-living space follows the concept of hostel
combined apartments. 6) Gym
▪ Thus, there is a separate cook and cleaning services
7) An event space (which
provided by the management.
is accessible by
outsiders)

12
CONCEPT AND PLANNING:

CONCEPT:

▪ Coho is built by the hostel and apartment concept.


▪ The interactive spaces provided are clearly separated from the private
bedrooms.
▪ Also, it is not placing far away to the private units.
▪ The placement of recreation zones along with kitchen and dining area makes
people interact more with each other.
▪ A proper plan is not that there is a recreation space in an end and people can
go and interact if they need.
▪ A proper planning is that, people are automatically driven to those spaces.

PLANNING:

▪ There are two clusters which are divided in the site level but are combined the
planning.
▪ Except the basement floor, planning of both the clusters if just the same and
the building is symmetrical,
▪ The parking is at the ground level which is provided separately for both the
clusters.
▪ Both the clusters are linked at every level.
▪ The site entry is separated but after entering the site, in-between the
compound wall is a gate which through which people of both the clusters can
access to all the amenities easily.

PRIVATE SPACE - BEDROOM:

SITE PLAN
13
PLANNING AND DESIGN:

BASEMENT LEVEL:

▪ The basement floor is separately allotted for Recreation with a kitchen and a
shared dining space with a seating capacity of 12.

▪ It is easily accessible by the residents of both the clusters.

▪ There is an event space which has an exclusive entrance, where small events like
birthday parties are held and that event space can be accessed by the non-
residents without disturbing the residents.

▪ There is a cook appointed by the management and the residents are not allowed
to cook their food by themselves.

14
FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR:

▪ All the rooms area connected by a connecting corridor which leads to the
breakout space.

▪ The other interactive and recreation spaces are in underground which needs to be
accessed from outside.

▪ It gives a home feel.

▪ There is a common breakout area in each cluster which is used as a dining space
and sometimes a gathering/meeting area.

▪ There are 12 bedrooms per floor (6 per cluster)

▪ There are totally 36 bedrooms (18 per cluster)

▪ The block holds totally 66 residents having 22 residents per floor.

▪ It accommodates totally 70 people including the cook, service people and the
managing people of Coho.

15
THIRD FLOOR PLAN:

▪ There is a rooftop dining space amidst the plants.


▪ This acts as both roof top garden with a lounge and a rooftop restaurant space
with a barbeque setup.
▪ This space is used for midnight events like birthday parties.

16
3. ROAM
SITE DETAILS:
LOCATION: Bali, Indonesia.

ARCHITECT: Alexis Dornier

YEAR: 2017.

SITE ADDRESS:

Dauh Puri Kauh,


West Denpasar,
Denpasar City,
Bali 80114,
Indonesia

ABOUT THE PROJECT:


▪ Roam is a 1750 sq. m co-living and co-working space in Bali, Indonesia.
▪ The vision for this place was to create community.
▪ A model of a micro society where people find their own space for privacy as well
as places of gathering, exchange, movement and education

CLASSIFICATION OF SPACES:

1) Public spaces
2) Private – Outdoor spaces
3) Public – Outdoor spaces

▪ PRIVATE SPACES:
1) Bedroom
2) Attached bathroom
3) Balcony

▪ PUBLIC SPACES:
▪ Roam is an urban place, and its density one of the key drivers to bring people
together closely.
▪ They gave these places of gathering a new Roof on top of the buildings,
connected them with a bridge, extensive deck space, cafe, bar, restaurant, lounge
and other recreational areas.

17
▪ Also, the central pool, the community kitchen and downstairs garden bar offer
active areas for guests and visitors

DESIGN CONCEPT:

▪ Balinese life around built structure is that of community through density.

▪ Taking the model of a traditional Balinese compound to another level, the feeling of
family as an organism of exchange and life was always a key driver in the design for
Roam.

▪ 'All under one roof' was another key design driver.

▪ The efficient canopy structure spans across all shared spaces.

▪ The architecture gives opportunity to add exciting new components such as meeting
rooms, offices and lecture rooms, canopies, bridges and more garden space.

MATERIALS USED:

▪ Different opacities through a range of materials such as bamboo, tin and poly
carbonate turn the place into a light, yet protected outpost high up, overlooking
its surrounding.

▪ High grown bamboo, palms and other plants make the place into a orchestrated
yet friendly and homely place.

▪ Plant life is a key image in the perception of why we love Bali so much. that is why
it became the most important material to implement into the design.

▪ Other materials were chosen through best fitness for use.

▪ This touches the topic of sustainability.

18
PLANNING AND DESIGN:

▪ The ground and first floors of the building now contain a series of bedrooms, each
with their own private bathrooms and patios.

▪ Roam offers rooftop lounge spaces, a swimming pool, a large communal kitchen
and a barbecue garden.

▪ These include a sunbathing deck, a cafe, a wine bar, a restaurant, a lounge and a
yoga area.

PSYCHOLOGICAL FEEL:

• The project follows the standard model of co-living complexes, which function like a cross
between student housing and hotels. Occupants rent serviced rooms, which are
accompanied by communal living areas and resources.

• A model of a micro society where people find their own space for privacy, as well as
places of gathering, exchange, movement and education

• The U-shaped complex is made up of three former apartment buildings.

• Plants play an important role in the design too, with tall bamboo and palms featuring
throughout.

• Vines hang over the balconies, while trees surround the swimming pool.

• The rooftop amenities are accessible by the non-residents also.

19
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

20
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

21
CASE STUDIES – IN BANGALORE (TO UNDERSTAND ROOM TYPE)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
CASE STUDIES – SPATIAL UNDERSTANDING

1. KRAFTWERK 1 HEIZENHOLZ
SITE DETAILS:
LOCATION: Zurigo, Svizzera.

YEAR: 2012.

THE SHARED SPACE: THE PRIVATE SPACE:

Area – 150.8 sq. m Area – 225 sq. m

Sq. m per person – 15.1 sq. m Sq. m per person – 22.5 sq. m

31
2. CO-RESIDENCE: HABITER EN GRAND
SITE DETAILS:
LOCATION: Paris, France.

YEAR: 2012.

THE SHARED SPACE: THE PRIVATE SPACE:

Area – 317.7 sq. m Area – 389.9 sq. m

Sq. m per person – 16.8 – 14.5 sq. m Sq. m per person – 17.7 – 20.5 sq. m

32
3. COOP HOUSING AT RIVER SPREEFELD
SITE DETAILS:
LOCATION: Berlin, Germany.

YEAR: 2013.

THE SHARED SPACE: THE PUBLIC SPACE:

Area – 179.4 sq. m Area – 494.6 sq. m

Sq. m per person – 10 sq. m Sq. m per person – 24.5 sq. m

33
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

34
THRUST AREA STUDY

BEHAVIORAL ARCHITECTURE

WHAT IS BEHAVIORAL ARCHITECTURE?

▪ It is basically the synthesis between human behavioral psychology and


architectural spaces and activities.

▪ There are those architectures of control which physically prevent or direct a


certain type of behavior and there are those designs that regulate user behavior
through the psychological effects of the surrounding built environments.

LIVING PATTERNS:

▪ The patterns of exchange in our bodies are the same as those in a tree, a
watershed, an ecosystem, or an economy

▪ Understanding the patterns of how one of these systems works, we understand


how all of them work, and how to work with them.

▪ This is why patterns are powerful: they enable us to understand and work in very
different media and across vastly different scales.

▪ Living (biological) systems work differently than purely physical systems. Being
based on exchange rather than action and reaction they can only be understood
as flows.

▪ Flows are understandable only as patterns.

DESIGNING FOR PATTERNS AND ACTIVITIES:

1) PATTERNS:

▪ Patterns refer primarily to individual movement

▪ Patterns suggests knowledge of the roles to be played by each person and the
sequence associated with it.

▪ For ex. In a restaurant a guest has the role of a patron, whereas the manager has
a different role, likewise the other persons.

35
2) ACTIVITES:

▪ Activities refer to group movement

▪ A series of patterns performed by the particular role players forms the activities.

▪ Patterns are interweaving, bringing together all the players to function as a group
in pre-determined ways

▪ So, the group patterns are referred to as an activity.

▪ For ex. A group of people in a political meeting, gathering

PLANNING OF PUBLIC SPACES:

In the planning of public spaces, the building should act as a social servant in the
broadest sense. It should anticipate behavior and provide for it. It should be flexible
where social activities are flexible and efficient where social activities are set.

The following factors should be considered in planning of these spaces

- identifying the social activities, the building houses

- the degree of flexibility suggested by each activity

- the house rules that prevail or should prevail

- the background and goals of the participants

36
ADJACENCIES:

The linking of the corridors to the various built spaces may be termed as adjacencies.
Based on the configurations it may be classified as

▪ pass-through adjacency
▪ side by side adjacency
▪ by-pass adjacency
▪ entrance adjacencies

37
PART – 4

PROPOSAL

• Bengaluru-based StayAbode Ventures has announced what is slated to be perhaps the


largest A grade co-living project in India with 1,000 people living in a community
environment in Whitefield area, which houses MNCs and a working population of over
50,000 millennials.
• StayAbode currently has 1,350 beds across Bengaluru and operates at 97 percent
occupancy.

38
SITE DATA

SITE DETAILS:
SITE LOCATION:

• The site is located in Whitefield, Bangalore.


• Whitefield is known for its tech parks and upmarket apartment complexes.
• Whitefield is a developed residential locality and a well-known IT hub situated on the
eastern periphery of Bengaluru.
• The locality is known for having offices of several IT companies.

SITE ADDRESS:

Near Tesco Bengaluru,

Nallurahalli,

Whitefield Bengaluru,

Karnataka 560066.

SITE DETAILS:

Site area: 25,250 m2 (5 acres)

Road width: West – 18m road (Nallurahalli road)

South – 18m road (Nallurahalli road)

Site dimensions: North & South – 135m, East & West – 150m.

SITE DRAWINGS:

39
SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS:

40
SITE STUDY
ABOUT THE LOCATION:

• Whitefield is a major employment centre of Bengaluru city and located on the eastern
edge of BMA.
• The locality is known for having offices of several IT companies.
• It isprimarily an end-user driven residential market, which comprises of a mix of
completed as well as under-construction projects.
• It is characterised by the presence of several IT/ITES/ Aerospace companies, Industrial
Areas, Defence Areas, Malls and Commercial Places.
• Outer Ring Road, ITPL Main Road, Old Airport Road/ Varthur Road, Road No. 2,
Channasandra Main Road, SH35, Graphite India Main Road, Borewell Road, Nalluruhalli
Main Road are some of the major arterial roads forming the connectivity network within
the planning district.

PROPOSED LANDUSE MAP:

Residential zone

Commercial zone

Industrial zone

Public & Semi public zone

Open space/Parks/Recreation

41
SITE ACCESS:

• 3.6km – Outer Ring Road


• 3.7km – ITPL Main Road / Whitefield Main Road

TECH PARKS:

• Alongside Tesco Bengaluru


• 700m – Tata Consultancy Services
• 1.3km – L&T Infotech
• 1.6km – Mindtree Limited
• 2.0km - Accenture
• 2.1km – Aegis, ITBP
• 2.5km – Mu sigma ITPL SEZ

HEALTHCARE:

• 300m – Vydehi Hospital


• 2.7km – Manipal Hospital
• 3.4km – Vasan Eye Care Hospital
• 4.2km – Columbia Asia Hospital
• 4.3km - Svastha Hospital

SCHOOLS:

• 750m - Vydehi School of Excellence


• 2.2km – Glentree Academy
• 2.5km – The foundation School
• 3.1km – The Bangalore School
• 5.4km – Whitefield Global School

COLLEGES:

• 300km – Vydehi Insitute of Medical Sciences and Pharmacy


• 2.3km – Gopalan College of Enginerring and Management
• 5.1km – Government Polytechnic College
• 6.3km – MVJ College of Engineering

FOOD AND LEISURE:

• 700km – Inorbit Mall


• 2.2km – Park Square Mall
• 2.4km - Forum Shantiniketan Mall
• 5.9km – VR Bengaluru
• 6.2km – Phoenix Marketcity

42
SITE LOCATION – WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE:

PROPOSED SITE (ZONE B)

PROPOSED SITE (PD 11)

43
ABOUT THE LOCATION OF THE SITE:

• Whitefield houses number of IT/ ITES/ Aerospace Companies in ITPB, KIADB Export
Promotion Industrial Area, Bagamane Tech Park and other IT premises and has Dodde
Nakundi Industrial Areas, Vishweshwarya Industrial Estates.
• This Planning District has potential to accommodate additional population and at the
same time redevelopment/ upgradation of certain areas is seen required.

DEMOGRAPHY:

• The population has more than doubled to 2,07,212 (2011 census) with the 127.57% increase
over 2001 population (91,056).

INDUSTRIAL:

• Industrial land uses account for 9.04% of total area of planning district.
• The large IT/ ITES Companies and Business Houses in ITPB, KIADB Export Promotion
Industrial Area, Bagmane Tech Park, Office Space along outer ring road, Brigade
Metropolise and Presige Shaniniketan, on ITPL Main Road, Industrial Areas like
Doddanakundi, Sadarmangala, Devasandra, Kadugudi KSIIDC Industrial and Aerospace
companies provide employment in both the IT/ITES, Manufacturing, Establishments and
retails shops.

COMMERCIAL:

• Commercial land uses account for 2.76% of total area of planning district.
• Commercial activity is seen along Old Airport Main Road/ Varthur Road, Graphite India
Main Road, AECS Layout, SH 35, Borewell Main Road and Immadihalli Main Road.
• There are 6 Malls and several small establishments which also provide employment.
• Also, a small vegetable & fruit market is located along Sri Krishna Temple Road providing
daily needs to local residents. (4.0km from the Site)

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION:

• At present, Buses operated by BMTC and private companies (for their employees), cabs
are the only modes that are available in this planning district, though proposed Metro
Phase 1 extension to Whitefield is expected to improve public transport options further.
• The critical arteries are ITPL Main Road, Old airport road/ Varthur Road, Graphite India
Main Road, Kundanhalli gate main road, Hoddi Main Road, Outer Ring Road.

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE:

• There are around 81 schools and various educational and research institutions such as
the CMRIT, Shri Satyasai Institute for Higher Medical Studies, Forest Technical and
Administrative Training Institute, etc. Further, there are 5 Government health centres &
hospitals and 10 private hospitals, with a total of capacity of 683 beds.

44
CLIMATE STUDY
TEMPERATURE:

TEMPERATURE
35

30 27.9 28.6 28.4


24.8 25.7 24.9
23.8 24.6 24.3 24
25 23 22.3

20

15

10

0
Januar Febru Augus Septe Octob Nove Dece
March April May June July
y ary t mber er mber mber
TEMPERATURE [°C] 23 24.8 27.9 28.6 28.4 25.7 24.9 23.8 24.6 24.3 24 22.3

• Average annual temperature (2019) - 25.2 °C


• Maximum temperature (2019) – 30.2 °C
• Minimum temperature (2019) – 20.2 °C
• The hot season lasts for 2.5 months, from March 3 to May 20, with an average daily high
temperature above 32.2 °C. The hottest day of the year is April 17, with an average high of
33.9 °C and low of 22.8 °C.
• The cool season lasts for 3.3 months, from September 28 to January 6, with an average
daily high temperature below 27.8 °C. The coldest day of the year is December 30, with an
average low of 16.1 °C and high of 27.2 °C.

45
RAINFALL:

RAINFALL RATE
6

0
Januar Febru Augus Septe Octob Nove Dece
March April May June July
y ary t mber er mber mber
RAINFALL RATE (in) 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.5 3.5 3 3.1 3.9 5.3 4 2 0.5

• The rainy period of the year lasts for 8.9 months, from March 19 to December 17, with a
sliding 31-day rainfall of at least 0.5 inches. The most rain falls during the 31 days centred
around September 21, with an average total accumulation of 5.3 inches.
• The rainless period of the year lasts for 3.1 months, from December 17 to March 19. The
least rain falls around January 26, with an average total accumulation of 0.1 inches.

SUN:

SUNLIGHT
13

12.5

12

11.5

11

10.5

10
Janua Febru Marc Augus Septe Octob Nove Dece
April May June July
ry ary h t mber er mber mber
SUNLIGHT (Hours) 11.28 11.43 12.6 12.25 12.23 12.53 12.48 12.3 12.7 11.5 11.32 11.22

46
• The shortest day is December 21, with 11 hours, 22 minutes of daylight; the longest day is
June 21, with 12 hours, 53 minutes of daylight.

WIND SPEED:

Wind speed
9 8.4
7.9
8
6.9
7 6.5

6
WIND SPEED

5 4.5
4.1 3.9
3.8
4 3.5 3.3
3
3 2.6

0
Janua Febru Augus Septe Octob Nove Dece
March April May June July
ry ary t mber er mber mber
Wind speed (km/h) 4.1 4.5 3.5 2.6 3.3 6.9 8.4 7.9 6.5 3.8 3 3.9

• Average annual wind speed - 4.9 km/h

WIND DIRECTION:

WIND DIRECTION

NE

SE

SW

NW

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

NW W SW S SE E NE N
WIND DIRECTION (%) 2 8 40 3 5 23 19 1

47
• The wind is most often from the south-west, west for 6.6 months, from April 30 to
October 10, with a peak percentage of 98% on July 28.
• The wind is most often from the north-east, east for 5.4 months, from October 10 to April
28, with a peak percentage of 90% on January 1.

HUMIDITY:

• The muggier period of the year lasts for 8.1 months, from March 31 to December 1, during
which time the comfort level is muggy, oppressive, or miserable at least 22% of the time.
The muggiest day of the year is June 5, with muggy conditions 79% of the time.
• The least muggy day of the year is January 22, with muggy conditions 4% of the time.

48
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL RULES

49
50
SITE ANALYSIS

51
52
53
PART – 6

DESIGN

SITE PLAN

54
GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN

55
SECOND FLOOR PLAN

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (G+3, G=4)

56
FIFTH FLOOR PLAN

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (G+6, G=7)

57
EIGHTH FLOOR PLAN

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (G+9, G=10)

58
ELEVENTH FLOOR PLAN

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (G+12, G=13)

59
BASEMENT - 1

BASEMENT – 2

60
SECTION AA’

SECTION BB’

61
FRONT ELEVATION

REAR ELEVATION

62
3D VIEWS

63
64
65
66
PART VII - References:

1. Almatarneh, D. R. (2014 February). Analysis of Activity Patterns and Design Features Relationships
in urban public spaces. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, Vol, 04,
Issue 2, 34-51.

2. Biggar, J. (2015). Investing in Public realm, Challenges Opportunities and lessons for Toronto.
Toronto: MITACS Accelerate internship program.

3. (2011). Census of India. Government of India.

4. Council, F. c. (2005). HOWTH-Have your say public realm Stakeholder consultation. East Dublin.

5. Dr. Joan Clos. (2011). Urbanization : issues and challenges in the 21 st century. UN Habitat.

6. Eckersley, R. (2013, September). Actions to Avert Apocalypse. The futurist.

7. GoI. (2011). India’s urban demographic transition.

8. Haas, M. C. (2014 , May). The Globalization of Migration: Has the World Become More Migratory.
DEMIG project, European Community's Seventh Framework Programme . .

9. JAS. (2016, April). Evolution of JAS India.

10. Khurana, R. (2011). Technological progress is by far the best way to improve quality of life.
THINK.

11. LAP, W. -S. (n.d.). Urban Structure, Design & Public Realm qualities. LAP Development Strategy,
pp. 38-40.

12. Matthew Carmona, S. T. (2003). Public Places, urban spaces.

13. Ministry of Urban development, G. o. (2015). Urban and regional development plans formulation
and implementation guidelines.

14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000074678 - living culture of Tamils. • Burton Stein


(1978). South Indian Temples. Vikas. ISBN 978-0706904499.

15. Pran Nath Chopra (1979). History of South India: Medieval period. S. Chand.

16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_architecture

17. "Great Living Chola Temples". World Heritage: Unesco.org. Retrieved 6 November 2010.

67
ENCLOSURES - DESIGN SHEETS

68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78

You might also like