Experimental Report 2.0
Experimental Report 2.0
Experimental Report 2.0
Group: 2
I/ Experiment Motivations
Tri
t1 (s) t1 ’(s) t2 ’
al
1 0.166 0.815 0.272
2 0.167 0.803 0.271
3 0.165 0.773 0.269
4 0.167 0.789 0.271
5 0.166 0.786 0.269
6 0.166 0.787 0.270
7 0.166 0.797 0.269
8 0.166 0.794 0.271
9 0.166 0.799 0.271
10 0.166 0.797 0.271
V/ DATA PROCESSING
1) Elastic collision
a. Momentum
P1 = m1 ⃗⃗⃗
v1 + m2 ⃗⃗⃗
v2
S̅1 10 × 10−2
P̅1 = ̅̅̅̅
m1 = 398 × 10−3 × = 0.240(kgm⁄s)
t̅1 0.166
Hence
P1 = 0.240 ± 0.002(kgm⁄s)
The total momentum after collision are:
P2 = m1 ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗
v1 ′ + m2 ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗
v2 ′
̅̅̅
S2 S̅1 10 × 10−2 10 × 10−2
P̅2 = |m
̅̅̅̅2 ̅̅̅̅1 | = |799 × 10−3 ×
−m − 398 × 10−3 × | = 0.246(kgm⁄s)
t̅̅2̅̅′ t̅̅̅
1′ 0.270 0.794
2 2
∆m1 2 ∆t1 ′ ∆m2 2 ∆t 2 ′
⟹ ∆P2 = P̅2 √( ) +( ) +( ) +( )
m1
̅̅̅̅ t̅̅̅
1′ m2
̅̅̅̅ ̅t̅2̅̅′
2
1 0.021 2 1 2 0.002 2
= 0.246 × √( ) +( ) +( ) +( )
399 0.794 799 0.270
= 0.007(kgm⁄s)
Hence
P2 =0.246 ± 0.007(kgm⁄s)
b. Kinetic energy
Hence
K1 = 0.072 ± 0.001(J)
The total Kinetic energy after collision are:
2 2 2 2
1 S̅1 1 ̅̅̅
S2 398 × 10−3 10 × 10−2 799 × 10−3 10 × 10−2
̅K̅̅2̅ = m̅̅̅̅1 ( ) + m ̅̅̅̅2 ( ) = ×( ) + ×( )
2 ̅̅̅
t1 ′ 2 ̅t̅2̅̅′ 2 0.794 2 0.270
= 0.058(J)
2 2
∆t 2 ′ ∆t1 ′ 0.002 2 0.021 2
⇒ ∆K 2 = ̅K̅̅2̅√(2 ) + (−2 ) = 0.058 × √4 ( ) + 4 ( ) = 0.003(J)
t̅̅2̅̅′ ̅̅̅
t1 ′ 0.270 0.794
Hence
K 2 = 0.058 ± 0.003(J)
|K 2 − K1 | |0.058 − 0.072|
C% = = × 100% = 19.44%
K1 0.072
2) Inelastic collision
a. Momentum
S̅1 10 × 10−2
P̅1 = ̅̅̅̅
m1 = 799 × 10−3 × = 0.334(kgm⁄s)
t̅1 0.239
Hence
P1 = 0.334 ± 0.005(kgm⁄s)
2
∆m1 2 ∆m2 2 ∆t 2 ′ 1 2 1 2 0.006 2
̅ √
⇒ ∆P2 = P2 ( ) +( ) +( √
) = 0.303 × ( ) +( ) +( )
𝑚1 𝑚2 𝑡2 ′ 799 398 0.395
= 0.005(kgm⁄s)
Then P22 = 0.303 ± 0.005(kgm⁄s)
Hence
P2 = 0.303 ± 0.005(kgm⁄s)
b. Kinetic energy
Hence
K1 = 0.070 ± 0.002(J)
|K 2 − K1 | |0.038 − 0.070|
C% = = × 100% = 45.71%
K1 0.070
The kinetic energy after a completely inelastic collision is significantly less than
before and it appear the change in the kinetic energy between m1 and m2 because
having the friction.