How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny
How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny
How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny
Luke Ohanian
Mrs. Morris
History Period 4
25 February 2022
Tyranny is like hell. This relates to tyranny because they are both dark places where you
get tortured. It is a dark place because tyranny can destroy a whole country. Due to the fact that
the old Constitution had many flaws, the authors created a new Constitution. They wanted to
create a strong central government without letting any one person or group be too powerful. The
people's Constitution guards against tyranny in four main ways: Federalism, Separation of
Powers, Checks and Balances, and finally, by balancing out power between small states and large
states.
Federalism is the first way the Constitution guards against tyranny. Federalist paper #51,
James Madison states that “‘In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the
people is first divided between two distinct governments [states and federal]...”’(Doc. A). This
type of government guards against tyranny by preventing the central government from gaining
too much power because it gives the states power, too. For example, the states are able to hold
elections and establish schools, etc. The central government can declare war and print and coin
money, etc. States have the power to control inside the states and the central government is in
charge of anything internationally, such as national defense. In 1788, James Madison wrote
Federalist paper #51 to persuade citizens to ratify the Constitution explaining ”Hence a double
security arises to the rights of the people.”’ Having a double security government means the
United States citizens by the states having certain power and the country has other power. A state
Ohanian 2
and federal government controlling each other prevents tyranny from happening. Although
Federalism is one way to guard against tyranny, Separation of Powers is another way.
Separation of Powers is the second way the Constitution guards against tyranny. James
Madison wrote Federalist paper #47, “‘The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive
and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary,
self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny…”’(Doc B).
All of the powers are divided into three branches, which means that each branch can control the
other. For example, the Legislative branch can impeach the president(executive branch).
Together the three branches powers consist of people who can control laws and protect citizens
from tyranny. The three branches can each control each other at least one way. Document B
states, “‘...Liberty requires that the three great departments of powers should be separate and
distinct”’(Doc B). Basically, the Legislative Branch should be the opposite of the Executive or
Judicial Branch. Each branch has a different job or role to play in this government to prevent
tyranny. This may prevent tyranny because if one group or person controls a branch the other
two can stop that branch. In conclusion, the separation of powers protects us from tyranny.
Checks and balances are another way to guard against tyranny. In Federalist Paper #51,
James Madison states, “‘...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a
manner as that they may be a check on the other…[the three branches] should not be so far
separated as to have no constitutional control over each other”’(Doc. C). This basically means
other branches check on each other to make sure they have all the same amount of power. They
check each other’s power by agreeing or disagreeing with other branches, the Legislative
Branch(Congress) can check the Executive Branch(president) by impeaching the President and
Ohanian 3
removing him or her from office. The three branches can check each other at all times. One
example that the Judicial branch controls the Legislative branch is “The court can declare laws
unconstitutional”(Doc C). Basically, no one person or group can control the government even if
they control one branch. By using checks and balances the Judicial branch can check the
Legislative branch by declaring a law unconstitutional. Using checks and balances in the
State compromise is another way to guard against tyranny. In the Constitution of the
to…[population]...The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand.”
For every thirty thousand people, one representative will be elected for that state. It guards
against tyranny by allowing a fair ratio of representatives between states with small populations,
as well as states with larger communities. Also, the Senate has a states compromise which means
each will have two senators per state. Article 1, Section 3, Senate in the Constitution says “The
Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the
legislatures thereof for six years; and each senator shall have one vote”(Doc. D). Through the
Senate, there is a balanced representation because each state gets 2 votes. This guards against
tyranny by making every state have equal power. Small/large states compromise is the last way
are the four key ways that the Constitution protects its citizens from a tyrannical regime. History
is filled with examples of people who rule with tyranny and ruin other people’s lives. The
framers of the Constitution wanted to ensure happiness among the states and national