Shahriar Zaman - MID ECO 1
Shahriar Zaman - MID ECO 1
Shahriar Zaman - MID ECO 1
Assignment
For Mid-term
Course Title: Microeconomics
Course Code: ECO 101
Let’s relate this problem with a production firm name Nokia. When mobile phone
market is taking by others firm they are running of ideas ….
1. What to produce?
Nokia have to decide the best combination of goods and services to meet their
varied wants and needs. Nokia must decide what quantities of different resources
should be allocated to these goods and services.
2. How to produce?
Nokia also have to decide the best combination of factors to create the desired
output of goods and services. For example, precisely how much land, labor, and
capital should be used to produce consumer goods such as Smartphone or parts
of smartphone.
3. For whom to produce?
Finally, Nokia need to decide who will benefit from the output from its economic
activity, and how much they will get. This is often called the problem of
distribution.
Then Nokia starts to looking for solution of these 3 big economic problem.
1. Solution of what to Produce:
The solution of this problem is very simple smartphone can be consumed only by
people who have more purchasing power. Price mechanism determines the
income of the workers, purchasing power. The purchasing power of the owner of
capital is determined in the same way. Thus, when the price of every commodity
and every factor of production are determined, the third problem will be solved.
At last in briefly, I think: The economic problem exists because, although the
needs and wants of people are endless, the resources available to satisfy needs
and wants are limited. The firm is a central institution in the functioning of any
economic system in which people meet their needs through the division of labor,
cooperative production, and the exchange of goods and services. As part of the
system, firms serve to produce goods and services for sale on the marketplace, a
necessary function allowing each person to combine specialization in work with
the satisfaction of his or her multiple needs.
Making an economic choice creates a sacrifice because alternatives must be given
up. Making a choice results in the loss of benefit that an alternative would have
provided. It is necessary to appreciate that opportunity cost relates to the loss of
the next best alternative, and not just any alternative. The true cost of any
decision is always the closest option not chosen.
In briefly I think; It is important when we study the cause and effect relationship
between two specific variables. In such case, we assume that other factors remain
constant according Ceteris Paribus and it identifies the exclusive impact of the
variable under study rather than the confounding it’s effect of other variable.