0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views7 pages

27716

Uploaded by

이영재
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views7 pages

27716

Uploaded by

이영재
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7
® check torupdates Transactions of KSAE, Vol.29, No.2, pp.119-125 (February, 2021) ‘Copyright © 2021 KSA (189-03 125-62 SSN 2234189 # DOK hpi okng/O-7467IKSAK-202128.2.119 Sse SAS set ABS Awe7| Js 1S aaa e0e PTISARUER OPE LAREN - HeKAW eRUY Prediction of Thermal Performance for Compact Heat Exchangers Using ‘Thermal Porous Medium Approach TaekKeun Kim"” + Sunglloon Song” School of Mechatronis Engineering, Korea University of Teelnology and Education, Chuygnam 31253, Korea CAE Team R&D Coner, Haron Systems, 95 Sinleo-ro, Dacdeok-gu, Dacleon 34325, Korea (Recelved 3 March 2020 / Revised 20 March 2020 / Accepted 25 September 2020) [Abstract : The thermal porous medium model for 30 percent offiet rate for mass production was constructed in order to conduct a CED analysis of the air-cooled air-charged intercooler, which is a type of compact heat exchanger. This CFD ‘model has features assumed by the charged air side offset fin and cooling air side louvered fin asthe porous medium model. ‘The air-cooled air-charged intercooler pressure drop and heat transfer performance obtained from the correlations with the existing 50 percent offset rate were compared with the pressure drop and heat transfer performance obtained from the 30 percent offset rate correlation presented in this study. The correlation between Fanning f factor and Colburn j factor with 30 percent offset fins is presented, For the offset strip fins for mass production, it was found that the Fanning f factor and Colbum j factor of 30 percent offSet fins presented in this study predicted the performance of the air-cooled air-charged intercooler better than the correlation of the conventional 50 percent offset rat. Key words : Compact heat exchanger( “345 21.27)), Offet strip fin( 221 AT 2 2), Porous medium approach (484) 4) AC, Friction comelation(®}2} 4241), Dimensionless heat transfer correlation( #42 @ANS “at 2), Computational fluid dynamics 4-9 ©} ‘Nomenclature turbulent kinetic energy A: area, mm? 1 fin fength, mm Cy: ergun constant P= pressure, Pa Re: reynolds number Cy, Cy coefficients of ition factor correlation Sy : strain rate, specific heat of ar, kg * K E total energy (is!) : spacing between adjacent fin, mm FPDM : fn per decimeter, em? ‘T stemperature, °C f fanning fection factor ‘; : temperature of lid in porous mediums, °C he interfacial heat transfer coefficient, Wim? » K T, s temperature of sli in porous medium, °C bh sheight ofthe fin, mm te fin thickness, mm J: eolbum j factor 1 veo, mis K permeability, 4: cortection factor ¥ : porosity “Comesponding author, E-mail: tkim@@korestech ac kr no ase -o8e © turbulent dissipation rate, mi? 1: viscosity, Pas ¥y rkinematie viscosity, ms vy eddy viscosity, ms density, kel" Subscripts © eross sectional direction 1D : darcian entity fe + Mlid-solid interface 1: i ditectional vector J+ j directional vector of = solid-luid interface LAe AGE VAE ate VE BSAA aes eae dae #4 2) SIS @ ua awe) ul 87] Fae el Selah alos oe ola $0) ER MHS HE YAS ae, aioe Metals SIS Bo) Uz} Wala whe} Be) BHA] Mel gels} aa) adel gale deh a7] aa Heat shiSs} ebsol zz} ase) Be Ath UPA] 24 ss obe Oot AS BEALS Ba, WE FH AE AeA, omy Ae BU Ay RAVE lS 1S SoH , RaW ASABE TALS] lolol OE WE HE Ash HQSIOS, Qa ARYL To HELD AGERE Qed rene oMAAER A DES 4 Ho] ASS oASal7] AA WE ATE Aes} Ste. 9A ANG Bel A B7leh chsbe} Joshis} Wenb'2 alae] alslel St wl WE AE tb) 49 Fanning f 3 Colbum j factor *}314] 5-2: AVA] a2. A, Manglk} Bergles?#= al le] 2 Betel) vistey A BASS AAA, o1e).2 SE Prandtl FA AE AT 34] &, baled oe ba Fe] Tinaut $F 9h ele pte ASIC EPH aol ete}, estate) AFE Chang} Wang” AchaichiaS} Cowell” Davenport,” ‘Webb3} Jung," Sundels} Svantesson! $0) sit, 1} = Eves, O03 AEM Fs} stpH) Ag lee AA] VBS 344 AB CALS Aa ZI} SF9T G, agael vag owe Fe aa} ealaay| MRA, ©] AA BS TIA] AHA oug AG ta} $70 1S dee wae 7 sho} ae. tol AHS SPL age! a 120 ANBAR eee Anew Abe, 2021 2 28 AEM AS alesA ase 7hgelo} Aah ALE ALAS OO, FP] LS SAL ASG] Mol ay ES FSS Brgun BPE AMATI eh. DeIst Be SS Fo VS By BSS 7 Ea PEASE ASE eprpolo|elol esha Bal Aa Aa A349} v]anape}, 42) a4} lay TEAL AsHol Hat 71S She ISLS 10 % Ol, BABS 95% oe] AMES 7S AY} asic. YD LHS ARG Boh Lp] HS AB SHS B7) 1B2}4] Mel Telol OE Vel Bees AS AS AE BR AHS) gle eh Ag] a ATES BF OEM ARG US BF 50% OE & 7D. TSE 23 He] als}e} Goodness factor Gif, fF", JD 50% BER BA 78 FES BH Slsich. Bt ARES Aargt|9) Ald ESB a SE LIT AEG A el AF, Wt apg) weap IBA VOLS AOL, 50% OHA BE 7S SH RAL US We} Se BAAS 28) #4 30% SU SB ols] oa AREY Bel Bert upp Aoleh. elas shel PAS sal, SE AEG HS Ge ede gee Ahold wey ARE WHE Y Wat FSS FSP] 218H30% LIBS AN LILA ol EL Panning feietion 3 Colbu j factors 2A) A7} gheh. WeDS H S He] BAe YA) Velo] THE OH RS leo. aL AEG Hol SH IAS als} olAS ol sho} 7] Hzp] Leal] aah HALAS AATSH TAT AS} W]ats}o} 50% SI BL TANS Oe LAG Ho) GANAS olBshs WF-o} Yay gy Bert doy als shea) Bess ele. 2, SHA SH DW 2lel BAA 21 SE 8 Ow EMTS 2d HL AS Tela, 30% 2 REAL QUPAEY Ho) BUAWASS F UAL Cho] 3] 88, 30 7H) S308 AE Ho] aE MES] Alseo] a SFMIUlM, 52) 50% 92M SS |e oma ASG ada 9} U|SLE}SLCH Fig, 12 AFA VE 30% 50% 23 BS 7Iz] 2aEM AEG A AY oleh. of | Me ex sl Ge S Bea) Saws eaele. 0] F aaa ARG Ho] Be IA} HALLS 9 af Bel A) BAAS RANS(Reynolds Averaged Aces OUR O18e WHE BER ae Ie (@)30% Ont ratio (6) 50% Ofte ratio Fig. 1 Frontal view of 30 %, 50 % offset ratio models TEL! Fig. 2 Geometrical information of offset stip fins Navier-Stokes Equation) °1"], thf WL kee SAE Ab B29. o @ o ® 6 nage 6 o ov, 2 Boh 2g Pr, =085, C, 192, ¢, 008, a 1¢, ca] D EAHA) PEE 2a AEG ACPD Qo] Bet WA] RAS Fig 394 BO. BVO A (CED S1= = Simens4}9] STAR-OCM+ 50= 15 ALB E}SEO}. Fig. 3 Boundary conditions for offset strip fins 22 Cag oe ols} Ze] H Mato ce CED aA} S AAA FH, & EMAL HG) He] Vee VRE awele) stede Ll BES ols}7] Hal, Yael Ae che wale 7g shot. chad vial ul gba ‘sioll HRE 7H 71 GAAS oes} Zhe] Darey wale. vp Ruy ® eV Ke a vide) FaHHO1T, wots A] Feel o] AS EY a Ul Fale) Bat Ses} el dell ME HBA Balloch. eho} WAAL aelex 47) WF ReRe << 1) BFA AG Hest. &, Ada BH SS HIS e SFG BAAS. o] SALE of21871 Hel, aad WAALS OFA 9} ZS Modified Darey 84 e1eh. 2] Wh ASS Cd vied a he] Poe] shed Se wl aa Darcy 85} 4 AF He) 4} Fochhimer Ws BLE FAUSEM, Ad IAM oe ey Selyte oh Ba al ES HE Slo. vp=~ Hye 9) Pa Ry Te Ply c SAL nal yl oda] gals} aetsto}, 4) uly BAS ABO, 0] BF A MAAS fal Bat a So] vlsto| chsh Be ax} WA AAS BS ae Trasctios of the Kora Society of Auomotve Engines, Vol 39, No, 2021 121 “oshKeun Kim + Sungloon Song a0 ay sey daagos sel ase aad ety ee Falah AP a AEN, waa Semi-empivica) TA WAS ALESESECL o] a Aa} ah Fal L seal So) aL alot AAS oF Shae. ary , + uy 2 (2)

You might also like