Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Task Description

    Uploaded by

    fries rivera
    The document provides an analytical rubric for evaluating student presentations on topics related to the English language. It rates presentations on 5 criteria - Content, Organization, Delivery, Visual Aids, and Audience Interaction - on a scale of 1 to 4. For each criterion, it describes the characteristics of presentations that would receive scores of 1 (Not Satisfactory), 2 (Developing), 3 (Satisfactory), or 4 (Excellent).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Task Description

    Uploaded by

    fries rivera
    20 views2 pages
    The document provides an analytical rubric for evaluating student presentations on topics related to the English language. It rates presentations on 5 criteria - Content, Organization, Delivery, Visual Aids, and Audience Interaction - on a scale of 1 to 4. For each criterion, it describes the characteristics of presentations that would receive scores of 1 (Not Satisfactory), 2 (Developing), 3 (Satisfactory), or 4 (Excellent).

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides an analytical rubric for evaluating student presentations on topics related to the English language. It rates presentations on 5 criteria - Content, Organization, Delivery, Visual Aids, and Audience Interaction - on a scale of 1 to 4. For each criterion, it describes the characteristics of presentations that would receive scores of 1 (Not Satisfactory), 2 (Developing), 3 (Satisfactory), or 4 (Excellent).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    20 views2 pages

    Task Description

    Uploaded by

    fries rivera
    The document provides an analytical rubric for evaluating student presentations on topics related to the English language. It rates presentations on 5 criteria - Content, Organization, Delivery, Visual Aids, and Audience Interaction - on a scale of 1 to 4. For each criterion, it describes the characteristics of presentations that would receive scores of 1 (Not Satisfactory), 2 (Developing), 3 (Satisfactory), or 4 (Excellent).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Analytical

    Task Description: The students are required to present Rubric class reporting in any topic related to English language
    that they want to select.
    Criteria Weighted Not satisfactory Developing Satisfactory Excellent Rating
    points 1 2 3 4
    Content 5 points Points presented not clear. Points presented was Many good points Enough points
    Information was far from somewhat clear. Too little presented. Most Presented. All details
    the topic being discussed. information and there are information was explicitly were expounded
    left unexplained. explained. clearly; no information
    left unexplained.
    Organization 3 points Information was very Information was vague and
    disorganized and very that leads to ambiguity for Information was somewhat Information was
    difficult to students’ extracting the organized with a little bit of thoroughly organized.
    Understand. information. confusion between ideas. Clear delivery of ideas.

    Delivery 3 points Presenter mumbles and Presenter was somewhat Presenter was somehow Presenter was confident
    mutter. No eye contact at nervous; voice somewhat confident with good with great
    all. audible with minimal communication skills. The communication skills.
    frequency of eye contact. voice was loud and with eye The voice was audible
    contact with the audience. and was able to
    maintained eye contact.
    Visual Aids 2 points Font size was not visible at Font size was fairly visible Font size was somewhat Font size was visible for
    all; with no design and at the back; with minimal visible at the back; with everybody; could catch
    failed to support the topic design; Somewhat support interesting design and interest; free from
    presented the topic presented. support most of the topic errors and
    presented appropriately supported
    with varied sources.
    Audience 2 points No listeners’ interaction at Hardly held listeners’ Held listeners’ attention Had active interaction
    Interaction all and unable to answer attention; entertained a most of the time; responds with the listeners and
    question being as by the limited questions and to most questions clearly. held listeners’ attention
    listeners. provide insufficient throughout the
    explanation for most of the discussion.
    time.

    Total Points
    Analytical
    Rubric

    You might also like